Predicting when *EVERY* MLB Stadium will be Demolished!

Спорт

I predict when MLB Stadiums will get demolished
My Twitter - / realpatrickmcl

Пікірлер: 374

  • @Uniquew1992
    @Uniquew19929 ай бұрын

    Fenway Park is on the National Registry of Historical Palces, and Wrigley Field is a US National Landmark. Those places will be here forever

  • @scotttild

    @scotttild

    9 ай бұрын

    Maybe but that does not mean the teams can’t move out of them at some point if they find they want to build something new. They can also get around that by leaving just enough of the old so it would not be considered a total tear down.

  • @Boyso5407

    @Boyso5407

    9 ай бұрын

    @@scotttild Ya you’re right that the teams themselves can move, which I doubt would ever happen, but as far as the actual stadiums themselves they cannot be touched unless they change the rules regarding the National Registry.

  • @johnepants

    @johnepants

    9 ай бұрын

    So was the original Soldier Field

  • @chrissquatch2795

    @chrissquatch2795

    9 ай бұрын

    You do know landmark status doesn’t guarantee safety from demolition right? Some day, all that will be in those spaces is a plaque on a condo building 😂

  • @deansmoker4853

    @deansmoker4853

    9 ай бұрын

    As true as I personally feel you are, it don't matter. I say that cause, Indians were part of our history, part of most of our childhood, but they want to write off the Indian heritage and pretend it never happened. Teams change their names to forget them. We all played cowboys and Indians growing up, but we may not remember when we are older. The government wants it to have never happened. How many of you always wanted to be the Cowboy, because the cowboy was the good guy, Indians are evil belligerents? But, it's not til you get older that you realize that you have sub 50% Indian in your blood? Was it only me, I doubt it!

  • @ZDoko-rv7zj
    @ZDoko-rv7zj9 ай бұрын

    Chase Field might get demolished but I really can't imagine the Diamondbacks playing anywhere other than downtown Phoenix. Their stadium is just such an iconic part of the Phoenix skyline. One thing they could do is play their home games at their spring training ballpark in Scottsdale for a year while Chase Field spends a year getting remodeled and modernized. Then the Diamondbacks go right back to playing at the new and improv Chase Field the next season.

  • @matthewoehler2472

    @matthewoehler2472

    9 ай бұрын

    Scottsdale would be a disaster for a big stadium. Granted I would like it because I live here, but no public transportation, far away from many population centers. Yeah, we are the"cool" part of the Valley (not me) but Scottsdale would be terrible. I would think Tempe would be better. And I am not a fan of Chase, I think remodeling it within it's structure would be better than demolishing it.

  • @LegoYoda7225

    @LegoYoda7225

    9 ай бұрын

    It would be way too fucking hot to go to a baseball game in the summer. Even if you had games at midnight it would be 100 degrees+. Legitimate safety risk for fans and players

  • @Politano1955

    @Politano1955

    9 ай бұрын

    The majority of the higher incomes are in the East Valley including Scottsdale, Chandler, Mesa etc. Attendance would rise quite a bit with a Scottsdale stadium location. Players would also love it because they all live there.

  • @HighpointerGeocacher

    @HighpointerGeocacher

    9 ай бұрын

    @@matthewoehler2472 Tempe couldn't get an arena for the Coyotes approved, so how could they get a approval for Diamondbacks stadium, especially since a baseball stadium requires more space and space is limited in densely-populated Tempe. You state that Scottsdale has no public transportation, but private motor vehicle use is still the most dominant form of transportation in the Phoenix area, as is the case for most cities outside of New York City and the inner cores of some of the older, more densely-populated cities. Scottsdale is closer to Valley population centers than the site of the sports facilities in Glendale that are home to the Cardinals and was the former home of the Coyotes. There is space to build a new Diamondbacks stadium by redeveloping older areas adjacent to Old Town Scottsdale. It would be easy for people throughout the Valley to get to the Scottsdale stadium via the SR 101 freeway, which comes from southeastern suburbs like Chandler, Mesa, and Gilbert and from northern Phoenix and its western suburbs. Plenty of parking could be developed, and with all of the restaurants, bars, and nightlife options, people will be willing to come early to games and stay afterwards late. If people don't want to drive or don't want to risk a DUI, there are abundant Uber and Lyft drivers available to take them from and to their homes.

  • @ScottysAir

    @ScottysAir

    9 ай бұрын

    @@matthewoehler2472 You're right! There is no public transportation. They don't have bus or light rail. They need a buses or light rail. Lot of people who rode on light rail from Mesa, Tempe, and else.

  • @JosephVE3GKT
    @JosephVE3GKT9 ай бұрын

    I'm convinced that Rogers Centre is going to be around until 2075 at least. It's in a good location and there's not really anywhere else to put a stadium. It's well maintained and has a retractable roof which is necessary here. And since Rogers is a publicly traded company, I can't see them dropping $2bn CAD on another retractable roof stadium. As much as it gets a bad rap/ranking, it just works so well for this city.

  • @ednicholson7839
    @ednicholson78399 ай бұрын

    This is one of the oddest channels on youtube, yet it's somehow quite watchable. Anyway, a retractable roof for the Dodgers? I just went to Dodger Stadium this week and it's still a great experience with one big exception -- driving there. The Dodgers don't need a roof and probably won't need a new stadium for another half century or more. What they need is a subway stop, trolley stop, bus stops or multiple better ways to get there. Also, Camden Yards is not getting demolished this century.

  • @scotttild

    @scotttild

    9 ай бұрын

    They really do its just sucks in heat. They might be able to do some kind where they give the fans more protection, but they really need something new if they want to keep the revenue stream up. They also could consider moving to a different location, there really is nothing around dodger stadium and that just does not work great in this day and age, although LA is a bit unique in that everyone drives anyway.

  • @vasquezovj65

    @vasquezovj65

    9 ай бұрын

    @@scotttild I don't see Dodger stadium coming down anytime soon. Yes, the traffic is nuts and it can get toasty mostly during midday games on Sundays. That said the Dodgers usually finish close or near the top of MLB attendance despite the heat and the traffic. As for the team leaving Chaves Ravin, I can't see that happening. When they first moved to L.A. back in the late 50's the city council essentially tossed out a large group of low-income families to make room for the stadium. However, it would be quite the sight if the Dodgers ever do leave the ravine to see it replaced with an upscale housing development where once modest homes stood. If the Dodgers do ever replace Dodger stadium, I would like to see the stadium turned so it faces the downtown area. As it is now there isn't much to look at other than a hill and a few palm trees. I've been to the stadium, the views facing the downtown area especially at night can be spectacular.

  • @davidharrison3711

    @davidharrison3711

    9 ай бұрын

    @@scotttild They need to play more night home games, like the Texas Rangers do.

  • @donaldkennedy9573
    @donaldkennedy95739 ай бұрын

    I think Dodger Stadium, Fenway Park and Wrigley Field will never be torn down. I think each place will get renovations for years to come. And even if the teams move to newer stadiums that those 3 will be preserved. They could make them into museums.

  • @gooby1926

    @gooby1926

    9 ай бұрын

    With everyone becoming more aware of the Chavez ravine story around dodger stadium is looking shaky. Plus that parking lot is atrocious.

  • @donaldkennedy9573

    @donaldkennedy9573

    9 ай бұрын

    @@gooby1926 And McCourt still owns part of the lot. What they should do is put parking lot towers there. That would help. The worst place to park is near the upper decks.

  • @gooby1926

    @gooby1926

    9 ай бұрын

    @@donaldkennedy9573 a parking structure would help immensely. Dodger Stadium needs to take notes from Fenway, and incorporate the stadium into the neighborhood.

  • @ramsesgarcia8461

    @ramsesgarcia8461

    9 ай бұрын

    @@gooby1926nobody cares about that. If anything the owners owning so much of the land it will allow them to build a little city like the Braves did.

  • @gabrielsandoval7331

    @gabrielsandoval7331

    9 ай бұрын

    @@gooby1926a parking structure would be the opposite of incorporating into the neighborhood. What they should do is develop a quarter or half the property with restaurants, bars, even residential if possible. Add a metro rail stop in there coming in from Chinatown and the valley and take away the need fro people to drive into the stadium.

  • @MColemanTV
    @MColemanTV9 ай бұрын

    Kaufman is 50 years old but still feels relatively serviceable - same as Chavez Ravine. Citizens Bank will be one of those that in another 30 years time will feel like it was opened yesterday

  • @PredatorKingdom

    @PredatorKingdom

    9 ай бұрын

    Kaufman will be replaced though because the Royals are moving downtown in a few years.

  • @jayryan1018

    @jayryan1018

    9 ай бұрын

    Busch, PNC, Camden Yards and Petco will all likely keep renovating, they're just great parks to really ever get rid of, ballparks are built so much better now, that remodels will do just fine and keep up with the times more than likely.

  • @johnsonsmithson45

    @johnsonsmithson45

    9 ай бұрын

    Royals are quite literally building the new one not sure why other royals fans are in denial lmao

  • @thenachofan7677

    @thenachofan7677

    9 ай бұрын

    Not from KC, not following the beat of the Royals, so... Have they announced officially a project? Is the money secured? Has a shovel really turned more soil over than during a photo op ceremony? Are there cranes and construction workers busy? Or is the selected land occupied and some other building needs to be torn down?

  • @ikehammett5160

    @ikehammett5160

    9 ай бұрын

    Kaufman would be awesome if it was downtown in a neighborhood where fans can walk to games and live close to it, have something to do before and after games and had public transportation. I hate going to Kaufman, you have to pay a lot to park (more than ticket prices sometimes), it's in the middle of nowhere, no views of anything but the I-70, no public transportation (even if it does, it would take hours to get there). Cute stadium and yummy food though.

  • @zch7491
    @zch74919 ай бұрын

    Colorado has loyal fans that show up for a last place team. Mlb isn't moving rockies

  • @danielcastiglione5328
    @danielcastiglione53289 ай бұрын

    They won’t take out dodger stadium. People forget that is it 100% owned by the ball club, and safest building in LA for earth quakes. It was built like a rock in side of a hill. Why give up profits and share with the city?

  • @elsongs

    @elsongs

    9 ай бұрын

    Agreed! If The Big Quake devastates Los Angeles, Dodger Stadium will still be left standing with zero to minimal damage. As for heat, 70% of the home games are played at night anyway. It'll still be there well past 2062.

  • @Julian_Wallis
    @Julian_Wallis9 ай бұрын

    I think the Oakland Coliseum will be tied up in red tape for at least a couple of years. The split ownership is a big problem and will cause delays IMO. I don't see it getting demolished before 2028-29 personally. I think your Guaranteed Rate Field prediction is spot on.

  • @americangiant1003

    @americangiant1003

    9 ай бұрын

    In the end, the White Sox move to the Chicago Suburbs.

  • @saints093
    @saints0939 ай бұрын

    I think Wrigley Field will NEVER be demolished, that’s a VERY HISTORIC BALLPARK, I think it will be around for eternity, you can’t demolish a historic ballpark like Wrigley, same for Fenway Park in Boston

  • @rockyracoon3233

    @rockyracoon3233

    9 ай бұрын

    Throw Dodger stadium in and you have the "Holy Trinity" of MLB stadiums.

  • @BvSteel82

    @BvSteel82

    9 ай бұрын

    Wrigley has Federal Landmark status so it won't be torn down

  • @Boyso5407

    @Boyso5407

    9 ай бұрын

    Fenway is now on the National Registry of Historic Places so it literally cannot be taken down. The Sox might move to an upgraded stadium but Fenway itself will always be there, as it should be.

  • @rockyracoon3233

    @rockyracoon3233

    9 ай бұрын

    @@Boyso5407 . Fenway can still be renovated as well.

  • @ranelgallardo7031

    @ranelgallardo7031

    9 ай бұрын

    Old Yankees Stadium was just as historic as Wrigley, and they demolished it in 2010.

  • @RoxRock4ever
    @RoxRock4ever9 ай бұрын

    There is literally no way the MLB would move the team out of Denver. Top 15 in attendance every year despite the team losing so much and no other teams even in the near vicinity. On this point your "I don't know" was very apparent.

  • @pebmets
    @pebmets9 ай бұрын

    People who go to Citi Field mostly say what a beautiful ballpark it is. Don't know how it is obsolete. As for a dome, there was thought of putting a dome on Shea back in the 1960s. The issue is the ballpark is built on a old land fill so there would be questions if the ground could support the additional weight.

  • @JustinKleppel

    @JustinKleppel

    9 ай бұрын

    came here to say this

  • @johnm8079

    @johnm8079

    9 ай бұрын

    I've been to 27 stadiums in my life - Citi field is a liveless dump in a horrible area. This is the consesus.

  • @pebmets

    @pebmets

    9 ай бұрын

    @@johnm8079 That is your opinion which is in the minority of what many people feel. Never heard Citi Field being called a dump. Shea was called that, but it was a place many Mets fans loved. The area is better than it was in the Shea days. Still a long way to go.

  • @ranelgallardo7031

    @ranelgallardo7031

    9 ай бұрын

    @@johnm8079Citi Field is not in a bad area.

  • @americangiant1003

    @americangiant1003

    9 ай бұрын

    @@ranelgallardo7031 Citi Field is not prefect but better and safer than say the soon to be former Oakland A's stadium of nearly 55 years.

  • @estebanswan
    @estebanswan9 ай бұрын

    15:56 Target Field already has a district around it. The Warehouse District has all the bars and restaurants and is just feet from target plaza.

  • @DBPanterA7

    @DBPanterA7

    9 ай бұрын

    Bingo. The other thing, without sounding like a homer, is the Pohlads have continued to make renovations and improve the park on a consistent basis, much like what homeowners should be doing. The issue is when a ballpark or home has no changes for 5 years, for 10 years, and then there comes a time where a huge investment is needed to keep things afloat (see Brewers).

  • @Penny-less
    @Penny-less9 ай бұрын

    I think if T-Mobile Park renovates the right field upper deck into some sort of pavilion, that should prolong its stadium life. I’m sure they’re experimenting with the idea given that they put a deep dish pizza concession in the upper right field deck area that’s consistently busy every home game.

  • @djdiemdduejdj
    @djdiemdduejdj9 ай бұрын

    The problem with the Angels is the owner Arte Moreno not the fanbase (avg 30k+ fans per game even with 9 years in a row under .500) or the city. They do need a new stadium in Anaheim tho.

  • @kevingutierrez6845
    @kevingutierrez68459 ай бұрын

    Kaufman Stadium still looks great today! Has great atmosphere on TV!

  • @bknsty14
    @bknsty149 ай бұрын

    As someone who has been to every stadium, I can safely say Guaranteed Rate (Comiskey) is one of the nicest ballparks in baseball. There’s really no bad seat. The concourse is big. The food is the best in baseball. they have the scoreboard. Parking is easy (especially compared to some of the stadiums). It gets a bad rap. Most people who don’t like it haven’t actually been there.

  • @daultonlockett7856

    @daultonlockett7856

    9 ай бұрын

    that’s what i’ve been saying, i went for the first time last august expecting a dump but was pleasantly surprised, there might not be much uniqueness but definitely not bottom of the barrel

  • @bknsty14

    @bknsty14

    9 ай бұрын

    @@daultonlockett7856 Thank you. It’s just a nice, comfortable ballpark. No bells and whistles, but great food. And do people go to a ballgame for a swimming pool or for food? Nice weather 3/4 off the season. And it looks like a ballpark, not an amusement park. I love it. San Fran and Baltimore are my top two, but this is in my top 10 easily.

  • @BlueBlobfishGaming323

    @BlueBlobfishGaming323

    9 ай бұрын

    As a Chicago native and dedicated Cubs fan, I have been spoiled by getting used to Wrigley. When I went to Guaranteed Rate for the first time, I was kind of disappointed by how boxed in and screen filled it seemed. Of course, only knowing one of the most open air and old-timey stadiums doesn't help. The reason that it gets such a bad rap is probably because it only has one of the worst names of any stadium, and the overall Sox situation is not great.

  • @Boyso5407

    @Boyso5407

    9 ай бұрын

    @@bknsty14And that’s the problem. There’s nothing unique or interesting about the park. I think each park has to have something that makes it stand out. It doesn’t have to be as famous as the Monster at Fenway or the ivy at Wrigley but it just needs something to make it pop. There’s nothing wrong with being a simple stadium but in the long run I don’t think it will survive as long as it could have cause there’s no obvious reason to keep it in place.

  • @scottpilgrim4027

    @scottpilgrim4027

    9 ай бұрын

    I’m visiting all 30, I visited the Sox this year during a blistering day game. I absolutely loved Guaranteed Rate. To me, that stadium was made with the fan in mind. Best views for watching the game. Screen was big and bright. The seats were perfectly angled towards the playing field. The food was incredible, not just some lame ballpark food. I grew up in Angel stadium though, so literally every ballpark knocks my Sox off when I compare it to the Halo’s giant dump of a stadium.

  • @saints093
    @saints0939 ай бұрын

    I’ve never been to Kaufman Stadium, but from what I see, it’s still a nice ballpark, it would be wrong for the Royals to leave there and build a new stadium in downtown Kansas City, the ballpark has been given a major outfield renovation, so I don’t see the Royals leaving Kaufman Stadium anytime soon, they’ll be there for many more years, I think

  • @miserablecardinalsfan

    @miserablecardinalsfan

    9 ай бұрын

    as someone who's at the ballpark right now, i can confirm that this place is awesome

  • @ShshHdj-mi5lm

    @ShshHdj-mi5lm

    9 ай бұрын

    The stadium is crumbling, the owners want a new stadium there have already released renderings it’s pretty much a done deal that the royals are getting a new stadium, I do agree tho Kaufman stadium is great all it needs is a small renovation and it’s good for the next 30+ years

  • @Scar_IX

    @Scar_IX

    9 ай бұрын

    Theyve released renderings of a new stadium a while ago hate to break it to ya

  • @stephengross6989
    @stephengross69899 ай бұрын

    No one will pay for the Oakland Coliseum to be demolished. Expect it to sit derelict for decades.

  • @ousamaabdu794

    @ousamaabdu794

    9 ай бұрын

    The Coliseum and Arena will definitely be demolished. That land is prime..

  • @thechristianboomer
    @thechristianboomer9 ай бұрын

    The naming agreement for Busch is twenty years, so we'll see what happens. Cardinals have played in three ballparks with two names. Sportsmans Park and Busch. When they built the old Busch stadium home plate was delivered by helicopter. New Busch used part of the old ballpark. I don't have special knowledge, but I get the feeling Busch was built to last for a very, very long time.

  • @dogcowrph
    @dogcowrph9 ай бұрын

    Fenway 2.0 was considered before John Henry bought the team. A domed stadium was proposed in the sixties. Thank goodness it was spared.

  • @91_C4_FL
    @91_C4_FL9 ай бұрын

    Redevelopment projects have a funny way of dragging on for years. I have a feeling a few of the ones listed as demolished in the 2020s will hang around in a semi-abandoned state for longer than we think.

  • @waltermiller8676
    @waltermiller86769 ай бұрын

    petco probably won’t be demolished, i think it’s a forever park

  • @Politano1955

    @Politano1955

    9 ай бұрын

    Petco is one of my favorite parks, and I've been to most of them.

  • @HawklordLI
    @HawklordLI9 ай бұрын

    I live in KC area, no freaking way Kauffman is getting demolished in 2027. What a joke....

  • @jacrispy8008
    @jacrispy80089 ай бұрын

    Citizens Bank Park is just a classic, Its a hitter friendly stadium, beautiful skyline and just an all around amazing ball park

  • @joe_sindell
    @joe_sindell9 ай бұрын

    T Mobile Park just had some minor renovations to make it really nice for all star week

  • @electrorz2679
    @electrorz26799 ай бұрын

    as an arizona born and dbacks fan, thinking about chase field getting demolished aches because there’s so many iconic moments there. randy johnson took the bump, jay bell’s 6th inning grand slam, gonzo’s single, 2001 world series, you name it:( 2nd edit: also it’s an iconic part of arizona, you type arizona on google, you get pictures of the phoenix skyline along with chase field. it’s vibes are just perfect and etc. the restaurants around chase field are iconic too. we have the iconic opening windows. plus it being in the middle of phoenix makes it sm easier for fans to get there, compared to scottsdale and tempe

  • @Nachonacho602

    @Nachonacho602

    9 ай бұрын

    I really like the location as well living on central Ave its a straight shot down the street id hate for it to move some where like Scottsdale and have to drive further out. Downtown is central for the whole valley a whole other reason for the city to expand the light rail.

  • @electrorz2679

    @electrorz2679

    9 ай бұрын

    @@Nachonacho602 yeah man

  • @manuelgrothe608
    @manuelgrothe6089 ай бұрын

    3:59 If the Diamondbacks fail, the NFL Arizona Cardinals can have Chase Bank Stadium in Downtown Phoenix, Arizona or a new Football/Soccer Stadium right is under Chase Stadium

  • @peepthezoobazz
    @peepthezoobazz9 ай бұрын

    Rogers Centre is funny. Its a huge part of Torontos skyline. They kinda cant demolish it. And it sits there like a concrete fortress. Itll just get renovated over and over.

  • @rileykazama3145
    @rileykazama31459 ай бұрын

    If the Dodgers get a dome stadium they should call it the Dodger Dome

  • @mdit21
    @mdit219 ай бұрын

    Every year there is talk of a ballpark on the chopping block. It seems like yesterday the Chicago White Sox just got the New Comiskey Park (Guaranteed Rate Field or whatever the corporate flavor of the day is). Now they're in this situation again.

  • @HighpointerGeocacher

    @HighpointerGeocacher

    9 ай бұрын

    Not really yesterday, it is now 33 years old. Most dual-puprpose stadiums that opened in the 60's and 70's didn't last as long. A good example is the Kingdome, less than 24 years (1976-2000)

  • @Mr.Ed_Wayner
    @Mr.Ed_Wayner9 ай бұрын

    I’ll be long dead when some of these stadium get torn down.

  • @freakyfornash

    @freakyfornash

    9 ай бұрын

    We all will! L.O.L.!

  • @geeloorgaming8046
    @geeloorgaming80469 ай бұрын

    I think 2050 for T-Mobile is way premature. If you look back at how bad the Kingdome was before Seattle approved the new stadiums for the Seahawks and M’s, the current park will be around awhile IMO. Unless of course the team threatens a move again. The state is pretty divided on sports spending…

  • @Gravelgratious

    @Gravelgratious

    9 ай бұрын

    Yeah those right field upper deck seats need to go.

  • @DoctorEw220
    @DoctorEw2209 ай бұрын

    I think a lot of these stadiums are going to last a long while. They demolished Forbes Field, Yankee Stadium, and Tiger Stadium, so nothing can last forever. I could see the league requiring the Rockies to play in a dome somewhere down the road.

  • @bigleagueprod
    @bigleagueprod9 ай бұрын

    If the Cubs, Orioles and Red Sox were to move, I don’t see it being demolished. I see the stadiums just bring a landmark.

  • @JB-bs1se
    @JB-bs1se9 ай бұрын

    It’s hard to imagine how far some of these years are away. We will probably already be thru WWIII by the time some of these years hit. Heck we might not even exist by that time.

  • @rattmausch

    @rattmausch

    9 ай бұрын

    Why do we think so negatively about the future?

  • @reesejabs788
    @reesejabs7884 ай бұрын

    Target Field has a lot more area to develop than you think. It's likely to be around for a much longer time than you stated.

  • @KidFresh71
    @KidFresh719 ай бұрын

    SF has the best ballpark in baseball. Wish they would just call it Mays Field and stop with the carousel of corporate names.

  • @54raynor
    @54raynor9 ай бұрын

    Not sure why you would think T-Mobile Park will be put out to pasture before the other stadiums that are in its age range. There have been no serious talks about major renovations, and the building is still considered a crown jewel for stadiums on the west coast.

  • @TheSportingConnoisseur
    @TheSportingConnoisseur9 ай бұрын

    This is such a satisfying video 😂 thanks for covering all the stadiums

  • @MontagnaMagica

    @MontagnaMagica

    9 ай бұрын

    I think he missed Petco Park.

  • @freakyfornash

    @freakyfornash

    9 ай бұрын

    @@MontagnaMagica He covered it at the 12:37 mark.

  • @a.williams1945
    @a.williams19459 ай бұрын

    5:13 Why TF would the LA Dodgers need a retractable roof stadium? What a ginormous waste of taxpayer money that would be!

  • @guyfaux3978

    @guyfaux3978

    9 ай бұрын

    Air conditioning? Plus, in the spring, it can get a little chilly and damp at night, the way Candlestick was all the time.

  • @ramsesgarcia8461

    @ramsesgarcia8461

    9 ай бұрын

    @@guyfaux3978 Los Angeles doesn’t need AC. It has perfect weather most of the year. It’s too close to the ocean to ever get that hot.

  • @Anthoag96911
    @Anthoag969119 ай бұрын

    I think this is the only guy that calls twitter x

  • @justinsecrist1130
    @justinsecrist11309 ай бұрын

    You should say which city and team plays each. Since all different sponsors named now.

  • @americangiant1003

    @americangiant1003

    9 ай бұрын

    Agreed.

  • @uncletrilly3566
    @uncletrilly35669 ай бұрын

    Good video. It's interesting to think about these things, glad we agree PNC Park will be around, (ownership withstanding).

  • @gooby1926
    @gooby19269 ай бұрын

    Saying the angels leaving Anaheim is like saying Disney is skipping town too.

  • @scottpilgrim4027

    @scottpilgrim4027

    9 ай бұрын

    I feel like an article comes out every couple years that the Angels are planning to leave Anaheim for you name it- Long Beach, Industry, actual LA, somewhere else in the OC. I feel like the only thing that keeps them locked in that area are the Ducks across the street- but with how much the Ducks have been struggling with attendance, product on the ice, and their now aging barn, I feel like the Samuelis might consider moving the Ducks elsewhere eventually. As for Arte- hopefully that ******** will finally sell the team to someone who cares. One thing is for sure though. Angel stadium sucks. I just hope the Angels always stay in Southern California.

  • @JPBVideo
    @JPBVideo9 ай бұрын

    Contrary to what you said, there are some social spaces on the Promenade (upper level) of Citifield. There's the Hudson Whiskey place and the entire Promenade food court. All they really need are some more large displays up in the food court.

  • @subman721
    @subman7219 ай бұрын

    In the Halo Universe Progressive Field (Home of the Cleveland Indians) still stands as of 2552. Noting they are in Cleveland one of the Brute Commanders asks “What exactly is a Cleve?”

  • @calebkent6706
    @calebkent67069 ай бұрын

    9:19 “if cincinnati still have their team”their the first ever mlb team there is no way they would ever dare move. Their rooted in cincy theire here to stay. Thats like the montreal canadiens (the first nhl team) leaving montreal

  • @matthewoehler2472
    @matthewoehler24729 ай бұрын

    DG, why all the Northwest hate lately. Saying Seattle will lose tehir stadium in 50 years is crazy. Yeah it opended in 1999, but they keep it up, it's a perfect location, it's up kep, it's beautiful, it lasts. I would say it's a ???? like the Giants and Pirates stadiums.

  • @kevin2400
    @kevin24009 ай бұрын

    Relocate the guardians and bring back the cleveland Indians

  • @theyoshman3159
    @theyoshman31599 ай бұрын

    bro fenway lasting nearly 2 and a half centuries is crazy

  • @scotttild
    @scotttild9 ай бұрын

    Angles are never moving out of LA you don’t leave a number 2 TV market for a smaller city like Nashville.. Both Dodgers and Angles will build something new in the near future most likely some kind of dome or retractable roof. But no way to the Angeles move. Angles have a generally decent TV deal so they are not moving and getting less. Its just been ownership that has been bad.

  • @americangiant1003

    @americangiant1003

    9 ай бұрын

    If they left Anaheim, I can picture the Angels going to the Inglewood area to be SoFi (Rams/Chargers)and the Clippers new arena and create a new super complex similar to say in Philadelphia.

  • @williamnimbach6419
    @williamnimbach64199 ай бұрын

    This is a really interesting video!!!

  • @steelehere1
    @steelehere19 ай бұрын

    Dodger Stadium's biggest risk is probably a natural disaster like an earthquake making it unsafe. The same would be true for Oracle and Petco. Having MLB move Colorado because of its altitude makes no sense when high altitude teams like the Diamondbacks and Athletics (if they move to Las Vegas) are in the same league and if a potential relocation or expansion into Salt Lake City happens some day.

  • @racingphotographer8251
    @racingphotographer82519 ай бұрын

    10:51 the SkyDome (including its roof) was built to last 100 years and knowing how penny-pinching a company Rogers is, they'll keep kicking that can down the road until it's condemned and then demand the governments pay for a new stadium. They bought the stadium for an absolute steal. Taxpayers funded it to the tune of $500M (chump change today but exorbitant in 1989) and Rogers bought it for $20M (yes TWENTY, not a typo) in 2004. So I'd say your 2065 prediction would be accurate if Rogers sells the team to somebody else between now and then, and the new owners can build a new stadium without going to the taxpayers.

  • @jermaynec
    @jermaynec9 ай бұрын

    I think Truist Park is more predictable. Atlanta can't go more than a decade without building a new stadium. The heat in Atlanta will cause the braves to move to Marietta into a retractable roof stadium in 2029.

  • @knotadoctor1455

    @knotadoctor1455

    9 ай бұрын

    I was thinking 2035 would be when they will get a new stadium and sale Truist to a college like they were forced to do with Turner field but I don't see them destroying it

  • @willp.8120

    @willp.8120

    9 ай бұрын

    Do you not realize that the heat is much more bearable in the Atlanta area than in places like Tampa, Houston, Dallas, and Miami because it sits at around one thousand feet in elevation. You definitely feel sometimes a ten degree difference in temperature between northern Georgia, including Atlanta, and southern Georgia. There would be no reason to move into a retractable roof. Most games are near nightfall and the temperature isn't that high.

  • @dawgsfan1196

    @dawgsfan1196

    9 ай бұрын

    The Braves have their dream stadium, they ain't leaving. Truist and the battery is a money maker

  • @knotadoctor1455

    @knotadoctor1455

    9 ай бұрын

    @willp.8120 it isn't just the heat which can get into the upper 90s and sometimes the lower 100s but the humidity which can make the difference in temperature unbearable

  • @willp.8120

    @willp.8120

    9 ай бұрын

    @@knotadoctor1455 I live in the Atlanta area and have lived here my entire life, save times during college, and am currently 46 years old. I own a home in the northern suburbs of Atlanta. It rarely gets that hot. We recently did have a few upper 90d days but that is atypical. Where I live, the average summer high is about 88-89 degrees, with most hot days being no more than 92 or 93. This is unlike Dallas with temperatures often close to 100 degrees, or Houston with constant upper 90s and even higher humidity. In most summer days, the temperature doesn't even get somewhat hot until at least 1pm, sometimes 2 pm, and by 6:30 it starts to get cooler. A late day afternoon thunderstorm can take temperatures from the low 90s to 72 degrees within five minutes. The Atlanta area isn't all that hot. Only if you are constantly in the heat of the day( about five hours) on hotter days is it even an issue, and even then the hot season is only from the last week in June to the second week in September.

  • @fakefootball8407
    @fakefootball84079 ай бұрын

    The only thing wrong with Comerica Park is that the upper bowls are so far away from the field. In Tiger Stadium the seats were closer to the field.

  • @wolfiethedog76

    @wolfiethedog76

    4 ай бұрын

    I say also the seats are too tight and a lack of leg room as well.

  • @ClutchCityFan
    @ClutchCityFan9 ай бұрын

    Minute maid is an awesome ballpark. It's not tacky at all

  • @miserablecardinalsfan
    @miserablecardinalsfan9 ай бұрын

    I'm currently at kauffman and it's really not that bad, it's honestly underrated. personally, i think you overhate it

  • @user117831

    @user117831

    9 ай бұрын

    Location is the problem. I think they need to rebuild it downtown.

  • @miserablecardinalsfan

    @miserablecardinalsfan

    9 ай бұрын

    @@user117831that is true, but i don't think location should determine how good a ballpark is

  • @profwaynewsmith
    @profwaynewsmith9 ай бұрын

    Rogers Centre will last longer because in Canada, governments don't pay for stadiums anymore. Unless the Olympics comes to Toronto, it is going to have to be self funded.

  • @ousamaabdu794

    @ousamaabdu794

    9 ай бұрын

    I've never been to Rogers Stadium but it looks to be very well built.

  • @americangiant1003

    @americangiant1003

    9 ай бұрын

    @@ousamaabdu794 I have but when it first opened in the early 1990's. Out of the current 30 MLB teams here in 2023/'24, location wise is maybe the best. Near both of Toronto's 2 major subway lines and a regional train station that even has trains to Buffalo/NYC. Not to mention a major highway (called the Queen Elizabeth Expressway)that connects to other highways including the US border next to Buffalo. And finally Downtown Toronto including even the International Hockey Hall of Fame and shopping areas are within a 20-30 minute walk as well. Just my takes.

  • @brianreilly1860
    @brianreilly18609 ай бұрын

    knock them all down and build one baseball field that fits all the mlb teams in one big dome in the middle of the dessert. the dome will protect the fans and players from the radiation and the desert should prevent the swarms of locusts from disrupting the games. have it grandfathered in and have the seat positions adjusted, redo the upper deck and add some better restaurants

  • @robfigulski1139
    @robfigulski11399 ай бұрын

    Just like every video Ginger does... Talks about the Pirates and PNC Park as little as possible....

  • @rentslave
    @rentslave9 ай бұрын

    What is the attraction of Camden Yards?That small warehouse behind right field? Check out the buildings in East Newark,NJ if you want to see something huge.

  • @shsav2012
    @shsav20129 ай бұрын

    OK the joke was a Busch Stadium here. Will the naming rights still get changed before the stadium get demolished. Considering that’s the third building that has the first stadium name as people forget the last and years of Sportsmans Park was a Busch Stadium one. Or will the Cardinals eventually go the route of the blues and after rename there’s venue every five years or so… Or the soccer team, who had to rename the stadium before it even opened

  • @xxxYYZxxx
    @xxxYYZxxx7 ай бұрын

    Building anything in So Cal is so fraught with graft it's tough to imagine even Angel Stadium being torn down, let alone Dodger Stadium. The Padres stadium (whatever it's called) could be another 100+ year stadium. In another market, the Angels would have built a stadium in the 90's like everyone else.

  • @BenKrav
    @BenKrav9 ай бұрын

    New stadiums don’t last that long anymore. I wish some of these stadiums last that long

  • @TheKyleice
    @TheKyleice9 ай бұрын

    american family field (miller park) opened up in 2001

  • @bele2.041
    @bele2.0419 ай бұрын

    This is interesting. These teams can move around, abandon cities and their fans, seek greener pastures, whatever. But absolutely NO public money should be used for stadia or arenas.

  • @Boyso5407
    @Boyso54079 ай бұрын

    For the love of god please get rid of the Trop. It is a huge black eye for MLB. The fact that a ball can literally bounce off of objects and still be in play is ridiculous considering this is a professional sport. I would rather see the Coliseum stay for another 100 years then have to play one more game at that poor excuse for a ballpark. Stupid catwalks

  • @kjorlaug1
    @kjorlaug19 ай бұрын

    1. Fenway will get replaced eventually and the Red Sox will build near the Waterfront. But the new development delayed that for a few decades, I'm thinking 2060 or so. 2. Dodgers will build a new stadium as soon as the Angels do. 3. Citi Field will outlast New Yankee Stadium. 4. PNC, GABP, Oracle Park, and Target Field will become the new Wrigley, Fenway, and Dodger Stadiums, lasting many decades 5. Orioles will end up shocking the baseball world and replacing Camden Yards by 2030 6. Wrigley will be the forever stadium, outlasting Fenway

  • @kevindwyer2064
    @kevindwyer20649 ай бұрын

    Crazy to think I’d be 80 when some of these parks are demolished 🤯

  • @christill
    @christill9 ай бұрын

    The trend of moving to suburbs needs to end as a priority. And really, people need to get out of this mindset that it’s inevitable that stadiums get demolished and new ones built as a standard practice. The only exceptions would be if they made the mistake of moving out of city centres and need to move back, or stupidly were in the suburbs to begin with. I would love if they could lift up Tropicana Field and place it down in Tampa itself, because the Trop has a kind of cosy feeling to it despite it being a dome out in the middle of nowhere. There are other stadiums that are supposed to be better that I don’t get that feeling with.

  • @user-kj3ot4db1u
    @user-kj3ot4db1u4 ай бұрын

    When will MLB realize that Wrigley and Fenway are the crown jewels of their world? Both have evolved with the game. The stadiums are loved by their fans as much as they love the teams that play in them. Look at Chicago, Go to Wrigley Field and become immersed in the environment. Then, head south to the White Sox ( name changes every ten years) and sit in a giant box out in some manufacturing slum area. The park is 20ish years old, and we see sketches of the stadiums that will replace existing locations. Baseball has become a game of greed, and has lost it's soul.

  • @mgfan81
    @mgfan819 ай бұрын

    Rogers Centre (or Skydome, as I know it) is getting another renovation over the winter, hence why the Jays will be playing on the road for most of April 2024. Shapiro says it'll be in phases, and since this will be phase 2, I assume there will be more to come. I don't think they'll be changing the roof due to our winters just being brutal. Although 2065 seems reasonable, considering City Council has been rumoured to have a proposal for a new stadium on the waterfront. For what? No one knows, that's why it's only a rumour.

  • @zacatak619
    @zacatak6199 ай бұрын

    i cant imagine them ever demolshing citi field. the fans really love it, i think it will just continue to get renovated.

  • @Sports_fan_idk
    @Sports_fan_idk3 ай бұрын

    Rogers Centre is an iconic part of the Toronto skyline, so I don’t see it going anywhere.

  • @user117831
    @user1178319 ай бұрын

    Globelife Field is the same as Tropicana Field when Tropicana Field was brand new.

  • @davidlafleche1142

    @davidlafleche1142

    9 ай бұрын

    Every stadium in the world shall be destroyed during the Tribulation after the Antichrist is revealed.

  • @UserHorologium

    @UserHorologium

    9 ай бұрын

    You mean it was built without a tenant in the hopes of luring a MLB team, and resulted in six teams getting new stadia in their home towns by threatening to move to St. Petersburg? The expansions in 1993 and 1998 were well-planned, as none of the new teams had nearby teams competing against them for fans (except for Tampa Bay, and Miami might as well be on a different planet), and all four of them were located in large cities which were still rapidly growing. Things didn't work out as well as everyone expected for the two Florida teams, but the Marlins would two World Series in their first ten years, and the Rays have been to the World Series twice.

  • @robfreedman6496
    @robfreedman64969 ай бұрын

    You need to do one for NFL stadiums!

  • @Dagoat5903
    @Dagoat59039 ай бұрын

    The Phils really did build a timeless stadium

  • @grittyshaker
    @grittyshaker9 ай бұрын

    As a Red Sox fan, I don’t think Fenway will ever be demolished but if they do build a new stadium, I’d be disappointed if they made a replica field. I’d want something completely different but also unique.

  • @markb3451
    @markb345113 күн бұрын

    Dodger stadium is a dump in a garbage area of the city. There’s nothing in walking distance around it like bars, restaurants, or entertainment and it’s impossible to get in and out of.

  • @camdenboyle7551
    @camdenboyle75519 ай бұрын

    Can you do this but with the NFL

  • @user-my7cf3pz4j
    @user-my7cf3pz4j6 ай бұрын

    I will never understand how and why sub standard venues have been built since 2K. Mirever, the ultimate DISGRACES: Fenway Park and Wrigley are keepers...DAMN!!!

  • @matthewmorey8310
    @matthewmorey83109 ай бұрын

    Bro... Dodger Stadium is not going to be replaced with a retractable roof or dome. Lol.

  • @jdm90121
    @jdm901219 ай бұрын

    A replica Fenway with a retractable roof sounds like a total abomination. I’ve got to laugh about the infatuation for domed ballparks. It doesn’t get very hot in California. Why do the Dodgers need one? Makes no sense.

  • @sblack53
    @sblack532 ай бұрын

    The Jays are priced into Rogers Centre, especially with the renovated field level. Fenway and Wrigley are eternal. Fenway doubly so because nuclear Armageddon won’t destroy the great green jewel of the commonwealth. Wait that’s a fallout reference.

  • @vamoscruceros
    @vamoscruceros9 ай бұрын

    The Diamondbacks leaving Chase Field would finally solve the Coyotes' decades long saga for a new arena.

  • @jennatomashosky8624
    @jennatomashosky862419 күн бұрын

    I’m thinking that PNC Park could become a landmark.

  • @scottpilgrim4027
    @scottpilgrim40279 ай бұрын

    A dome for baseball in Southern California has to be the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

  • @Rondon216
    @Rondon2169 ай бұрын

    PNC Park is a forever ballpark. It's simply perfect.

  • @412StepUp

    @412StepUp

    9 ай бұрын

    They will never tear down PNC Park! The Pirates will never play anywhere else!

  • @HighpointerGeocacher

    @HighpointerGeocacher

    9 ай бұрын

    @@412StepUp PNC Park may stay for a long time, but will the Pirates always be in Pittsburgh? Western Pennsylvania has been losing population for many years, so how long could the Pirates profitably remain in Pittsburgh if the area continues to decline, and there are other areas with greater population and prosperity that don't have a team?

  • @Rondon216

    @Rondon216

    9 ай бұрын

    @@HighpointerGeocacher Given the crazy economics of MLB, I wouldn't completely rule that out, however, there are several other MLB cities with population difficulties as well. To move a team which has been in existence in the same city since 1882, and in the NL since 1887, would be horrific.

  • @HighpointerGeocacher

    @HighpointerGeocacher

    9 ай бұрын

    @@Rondon216 I recently visited Pittsburgh and walked around PNC Park on a Saturday night when the Pirates were on the road, so there was no game. Looks like a beautiful park with statues of Clemente, Stargell, Mazeroski, and Honus Wagner. There are interesting things to do around the neighborhood, but didn't have time to explore the area extensively. However, the greater Pittsburgh area does feel significantly smaller, and definitely a lot older, than my current home region of metro Phoenix, which many think of as a "small market" but actually is situated in a county that has nearly twice the population of Greater Pittsburgh. The population of Greater Pittsburg is less than it was in 1960 and had declined in every census tabulation since 1970 except for 2020, when the population showed a modest increase from 2010. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Pittsburgh

  • @ousamaabdu794

    @ousamaabdu794

    9 ай бұрын

    ​​ @HighpointerGeocacher Excellent point about how Western PA has been losing population for the last 40 years.. I really think that tend might be reversed in the near future.. Western PA is very affordable and has great bones.. With many areas in the states getting outrageously expensive, I think that region will see positive growth by 2035.

  • @michaelbilgen2976
    @michaelbilgen29769 ай бұрын

    Dodger Stadium will stand the test of time.

  • @ousamaabdu794

    @ousamaabdu794

    9 ай бұрын

    I agree

  • @scottkirkness8002
    @scottkirkness80029 ай бұрын

    Rogers Centre is being Renovated to give it another 10 years. The problem is there is NO WHERE to build in Downtown Toronto. They are in the perfect spot. Honestly the playmight be to spend two years in Buffalo and then build on the same spot lol

  • @victoriasuarez3762
    @victoriasuarez37629 ай бұрын

    White sox 2:55 lease is up in 2029. Imagine stadium will be demolished in 2030 or renovated by then

  • @Ibhenriksen
    @Ibhenriksen9 ай бұрын

    Well, this is...depressing

  • @manuelgrothe608
    @manuelgrothe6089 ай бұрын

    13:24 Busch Beer or Busch Baked Beans

  • @anothercitizen4867
    @anothercitizen48679 ай бұрын

    A second home plate plaque for 35th and Shields. Classic.

  • @ikehammett5160
    @ikehammett51609 ай бұрын

    Sorry DG, I don't get it. How do people rank these things? I find almost all stadium rankings and the difference between classic and old to be completely arbitrary and subjective. Ive been to them all plus ones that have gone and some international ones. What is your model? I think the top factors are location neighborhood and things around it, weather/comfotability, views, public transportation, practicality over flashy, organic over forced, and cost. I think there are a lot of classics here. My top 10 in order are Seattle, Houston, Arizona, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Diego, San Francisco, Baltimore, Minnesota, Miamii. Big honorable mention to Denver, Philly Toronto, Milwaukee as they just missed. I think Washington, Detroit, both New Yorks, Cleveland and White sox underrated, with all the new developments and with neighborhoods around the park. Future bubble stadiums are Cincinnati, Dodger, Atlanta,, Angel's, Boston,Wrigley and maybe Kansas City depending on how they all renovate and build up in the future. Oakland and Tampa are the only ones that need a whole new approach but could be classic at their sites if built up right but right now are the worst, Kansas city is close to being on the worst lisr..

  • @fabio40
    @fabio409 ай бұрын

    They already seriously considered replacing the Rogers Centre before they announced the recent renovations.

  • @djm5687
    @djm56879 ай бұрын

    I think you're being way too generous with the longevity of modern stadiums. Most modern stadiums "need renovations" after 20 years, and are then "too old" after 30 years. It is extremely rare for a modern stadium to last beyond 30 years.

  • @scotttild

    @scotttild

    9 ай бұрын

    AT&T is already past 20 years also and almost nothing has been done to it except the bull pens being moved.

  • @djm5687

    @djm5687

    9 ай бұрын

    @scotttild The bullpen being moved _is a "renovation"._ In about 10 years, the team will be complaining that the stadium is "too old", and that they need a new stadium (funded by taxpayers, of course) in order to "stay competitive".

  • @cost7569
    @cost75699 ай бұрын

    I can't about the year 2085. I will be a 110 years old. If the mighty Lord allow me to get there.

Келесі