Why was this petition even accepted😂 Wasting time

@manojkhedekaraayuanu

11 ай бұрын

I ABSOLUTELY agree

@akash-yb5ds

11 ай бұрын

Because he doesn't know what to do as he got what he has due to nepotism.

@warlord010

11 ай бұрын

Sorry bro SC kisi ke chicha ki nahi hai agar hoti to ye case accept nahi hota lol

What a great country we are in, who votes for this party which supports foreign interests over national interest

@sawankumargupta4833

11 ай бұрын

और वोट दो कांग्रेस को

@upscgateway9782

11 ай бұрын

@@sawankumargupta4833 kahna kya chahte ho Congress ho toh kra rahi ye drama

@sawankumargupta4833

11 ай бұрын

@@upscgateway9782 यही की भारत को कांग्रेस मुक्त बनाओ

@megalokhande3195

11 ай бұрын

I don't know then why people say democracy is dieing.

@hahahaha6525

11 ай бұрын

Thanks to modi jisne digital bharat ko aage badhaya .😂😂😂. Aaj hum congress ki gaddari dekh skte h

Why the petition is accepted by the Courts after 5 years

@gullycricket.262

11 ай бұрын

4years and 2 years been covid

@vinayavinay7953

11 ай бұрын

Court mental nana malku all supporting pakstitan

@shubhambhardwaj6896

11 ай бұрын

They accepted it to waste the time so that they can help India by further piling up the cases to more than 5 crore (50 million on Indian judiciary). It will roughly take only 350 years to clear this backlog with current pace of dispensing 'justice'.

@surendr3645

11 ай бұрын

they are part of the same eco system

@binodsarkarIN

11 ай бұрын

Because 2024 elections are on the horizon, court fixers are in action

This shows Congress true face. They speak the voice of Pakistan

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

Isme congress kaha agaya 😂

@azharnasir7677

11 ай бұрын

Bro u knw one thing language of truth is not language of congresa just tell me what u knw about jandk ....

@mayurrathod2992

11 ай бұрын

​@@subhasishsahooOdishayahan ! he is farmer khangress leader...

@saurabhdas2598

11 ай бұрын

I.N.D.I.A. can even sell INDIA 😂😂😂

@Present250

11 ай бұрын

​@@saurabhdas2598wat did ur amma indira did to Pakistan do u know... Go ask ur daad

As layman my understanding says Generally lawyer try to convince judges by their argument but what we see here judges are trying hard to convince lawyer . It’s amazing ,.,

@mohapatraism

11 ай бұрын

Jusges beg sibal to agree with them as if sibal is the guiding force of India

@raviprakashreddym2322

11 ай бұрын

First actually 370 rule has got from where from London parliament or India govt, so when the rule is prepared in parliament why this sibel is crying against judiciary he is a single amendment do to law which is parlament done

@balsharma709

11 ай бұрын

Shameful

@akash-yb5ds

11 ай бұрын

Nepotism effect

@tintiniitk

11 ай бұрын

And not just any judges, judges of the Apex court of India, including the CJI himself. Shows the power that Sibal and Singhvi hold in India's judiciary.

This is what pakistan government wants and mr kapil sibal is fighting their case for free...He should be given Hilal-e-Pakistan.

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

Unki ek hair mein jitna law ki gyan hai utna to pura WhatsApp University mein khojo

@muhammadalijinnah9646

11 ай бұрын

​@@subhasishsahooOdisha unka ek hair teri am1 ki *hut me gusakar Teri janam hue thi. Esliye tubi utna bakas kar raha he. Love you from Pakistan ❤❤❤

@AMBongVlog

11 ай бұрын

Isliya bengal me mafia k liye larti he o

@gagan77100

11 ай бұрын

Then why supreme court accepted the petition?And now kashmir have governor rule have from 6 years.And former governor said pulwama was organized by amit shah

@natramesh51

11 ай бұрын

He is getting paid which he thinks is far more rewarding than some medal or a sash to wear. Once a traitor , always a traitor

Crores of pending cases and full bench is sitting daily for a dead issue. Even if verdict goes against, cabinet committee will over turn. Simple as that.

@nitinchaudhary4252

11 ай бұрын

Please explain the powers of cabinet committee to overturn it

@laudalassan109

11 ай бұрын

SC mein only 60000 pending hain

@ashutoshpareek8617

11 ай бұрын

​@@laudalassan109that's not only

@swatiguhathakurta1269

11 ай бұрын

Absolute waste of national resources

@letmethinkv

11 ай бұрын

​@@nitinchaudhary4252this is not school😂

Few years ago I used to think that Congress n other parties might be corrupt but they would at least don't go against the interest of the nation & I had a very high regard for judiciary, I didn't even know the shortcomings of judiciary. But when congress n other parties opposed article 370, i was disillusioned. How openly these parties oppose decisions of national interest without fear & people don't even question them. It's shocking that even judiciary is playing with the interest of the nation. Why the heck they're wasting time on this topic, any person with common sense would say 370 was temporary. Judges behave like British lords, nobody can question them.

@kmrao06

11 ай бұрын

Sir, you have articulated what is lingering in the minds of millions of citizens of this country. Congress and its minions have anything but interests of the country, more specifically, of the safety of majority community.

@nalindesai09

11 ай бұрын

Judiciary is compromised by some 8 to 10 judges, last few years judgement proves that without any doubts, Modiji’s assasination plans by Bhima -Coregaon gang of Communists Naxals, Tista Bails, This case too and few more , Nehru autocratically arranged in cahoots with Abdullah’s to introduce 370 ; 35a etc to give J& K in their laps to loot including POK, in the absence of constituent assembly why can’t the Elected govt bring / Pass bill to abolish 370+ 35a, in favor of Our nation and stop the looting process of Congis, Abdullah’s, Mufti Saeed etc!

@factionguy

11 ай бұрын

​@@rajeshmagotra1926it's his duty to divide India? What nonsense you are talking about?

@nalindesai09

11 ай бұрын

@@rajeshmagotra1926 hay Bro, his first duty is towards our Motherland and if he is arguing against the Nation then he has no business to perform his duty which is against the People of Bharat Mata! He is an MP nominated by SP!

@DhruvRathee_Army786

11 ай бұрын

@@rajeshmagotra1926 I'm not blaming the lawyer, for him money is important. I'm blaming the apex court for accepting this petition & wasting time by daily hearing this case.... Discussion is just play of words & beat around the bush.

Sibal is like a cry baby in front of a calm , composed judge.

@babukumaresh9492

11 ай бұрын

He makes fool of SC

@explore8705

11 ай бұрын

​@@babukumaresh9492you make fool yourself , you are not expert in law but argument on constitution

@ARVINDJAISWAL10

11 ай бұрын

Cry devil 😂

@warlord010

11 ай бұрын

@@babukumaresh9492 kaise kaise log rehte hai yahan pe

Bail masters are now arguing like consttutional experts.

@N-et6gb

11 ай бұрын

No you are

@MrRatzz007

11 ай бұрын

Who are u?

@HimanshuSharma-hv9vo

11 ай бұрын

This is the problem with live streaming. Rookies and non legal background people start passing judgements on the basis of media portrayal.

@pravinmore4873

11 ай бұрын

​@@HimanshuSharma-hv9vokyu SC ne comment pass karne ka theka sirf tumko diya hai

@chetanpatel3618

11 ай бұрын

Because unko Kam nahi karna Hai time pass

We feel ashamed that we are Indians and even after more than 75 years of independence we are discussing this in supreme court...It's time for the Modi to change these things from constitution itself

@ameysutar9932

11 ай бұрын

Kabil Sibal just looks like bharatiya. Just like a mask

How is what Sibal's suggesting any different from what Pakistan also claims, which is that Kashmir isn't an integral part of India.

@alphaforest

11 ай бұрын

Well I would assume Mr Sibal is more concerned about his bill than integrity of this country. They expect benefits from India but want so called freedom. I fail to understand freedom from what and even if they get what they want (again the minority that wants so called freedom); how are they going to sustain themselves, their economy and prevent annexation by our very peace loving neighbours.

@srinivasaraghavansrilnivas1784

11 ай бұрын

Is Sibal a Pakistani

@vinsin328

11 ай бұрын

That is claimed by India, Nehru also. It is a disputed international territory.

@user-kg2rk3wi1u

11 ай бұрын

​@@srinivasaraghavansrilnivas1784Ur Right Ur Mother too is a Pakistani 😂😂😂😂😂

@letmethinkv

11 ай бұрын

​@@vinsin328no its not.....

No other country questions its own territorial integrity.

On the same note.. Sardar Patel got signed from all other Princely state.. promised to give Privy purse which was removed with an amendment in 1971.. this Case is utter nonsense and rather should all Judge and Lawyers should spend time to solve pending cases.. no Doubt that Kapil Sibal is in Congress.. case should be rather on Congress that they mis-lead whole nation for such long

@parameahwarbt4920

11 ай бұрын

Sir this kapil S is congressman .where was he when Constitution itself was sabotaged during 75-77 when lakhs of people were jailed, killed,!?😮, Did this so called K sibal condemn Emergency anytime !? 😮 now he is lecturing on one art 370 ? His arguments are on the line of rogue pak 's stand and hatred of indians 😮

@maheshnayak3001

11 ай бұрын

It was a fraud on the constitution to abolish the privy purses . Also the 42nd amendment added to the Preamble socialism and secularism which had been specifically debated and left out by our constituent assembly

@Dev_1947

11 ай бұрын

excellent argument.

@rajaroychowdhury6246

11 ай бұрын

This is a quite information. Then these fucking bustard shameless Congress politician lawyers are enjoying the AC environment of the court room @ tax payers money. Many many thanks for sharing this valuable information. Anyway I knew there is also some fucking articles imposed by the master of divide&rule policy the shameless fucking Congress Party way back in 1960s which is the root cause of Manipur violence. If you have any information regarding this please share. Regards and Jai Hind.

As per Kapil Sibbal the Government of India should take the permission of Burhan Vani like kasmiris permission to remove atricle 370 or atleast from the stone peltors.

@konvictzsamy3152

11 ай бұрын

In the same way who gives you power to amend article 370 ..even constitution of India itself has not given power to amend it It's simple as that if there is no alliance (370) b/w india and j&k then j&k is not a part of India anymore

@alphaforest

11 ай бұрын

@@konvictzsamy3152let’s for the sake of argument say, “fair enough”, would you prefer an annexation?

@nitinchaudhary4252

11 ай бұрын

Sir this a procedural issue.. kindly don't make it personal

@nitinchaudhary4252

11 ай бұрын

​@@konvictzsamy3152article 370-3 and 368 give you power

@Mayank612722

11 ай бұрын

​@@konvictzsamy3152Have you read the title of Article 370? It is "370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir"

Thousands of case r waiting in court. And this court is wasting time on this national issue. Is it really necessary. All knows situation before n after. Its waste of time. Why court is not speaking on pandit genocide... Still yasin malik, bitta katate to face vetdict...

Sibal ji is teaching the bench how to think like him😆

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

The experience in SC of Mr Sibal is more greater than the whole bench

@anonymous-qt9qg

11 ай бұрын

Then tell use his experience for country not against the country

@cccc2740

11 ай бұрын

@@subhasishsahooOdisha you mean exp in saving criminals

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

@@cccc2740 Here the discussion about Art370.....not about Criminal charges. Have some basic knowledge

@cccc2740

11 ай бұрын

@@subhasishsahooOdisha so one's past wont matter what that person represents ....have some basic human knowledge

To Say Art 370 is NOT temporary is like saying a Toddler must remain Toddler - Toddler is a permanent state .

@aidelfayaz7016

11 ай бұрын

We have not merged with Indian union...it only says that our accession with Indian union is temporary....so ending 370 ll definitely end our accession with todays intolerant India...

@Dpk_YT

11 ай бұрын

history padha hota to.. Ye nhi bolta... 😂😂..

@aidelfayaz7016

11 ай бұрын

@@Dpk_YT u sd read about it...we clearly know about our history from 6 thousand years for ur kind information...rajtarangee is a masterpiece of kashmir history written in 1100 AD...dnt teach us our history..... kashmir was a separate country...so it ll be in future with the grace of almighty,....it has been a historical blunder tht maharaja has acceded with such intolerant nation...vry unfortunatly...

@Kattar_Hindoooo

11 ай бұрын

​@@aidelfayaz7016islam came into existence just 1400 hundred years ago and Kasmir was yours for 6000 years ago🤣🤣🤣🤣...joke of the century...before muslims illegally captured Kasmir...it had been a pure Hindu state.....and it was one of the prime provinces of Akhand Bharat........read some history idiot.....read the books written by foreign travellers that visited India long before the birth of Islam.....I know you are worlds most illiterate community....simply jahil madarsachaap community.........

@himalayasekanyakumarihindu8034

11 ай бұрын

​@@aidelfayaz7016Who are you?? If you don't like India go to Pakistan. You people don't have any say as well as a stake in J&K. J&K is a and will be part of India and POK will join J&K soon by hook or crook or war.

British Dilema still there, Even after 70 years of independence. If India is a soverign nation rules should be same throughout. If it needs the constitution to be ammended it should be done. Isnt it 🙏🙏

@explore8705

11 ай бұрын

I want every in princely state must done plebiscite they decide there future at 1947 ( India ) took birth before 1947 there was no India country at all

@singatakberpura

11 ай бұрын

​@@explore8705Bharat is written in the Mahabharata

@jackal813

11 ай бұрын

Sabil is a traitor.. Should be given a permanent citizen of Pakistan. He may get Pak . Into a sovereign country..He's a intelligent man who could be of great help to Pakistan. .

@nanjappavm3913

11 ай бұрын

Kapil Sibal always prevail upon the issues without any merits and insist Hon'ble Justice to accept whatever he puts forth and one day He will argue Indua is part of Pakisthan.

@swami8774

11 ай бұрын

@@explore8705then you can take asylum outside india 😂

With article 368 of Indian Constitution, sovereign people of India has every sovereign right to amend any part of the Indian constitution in the interest of the welfare of the people of India. (Including article 370)....✊

@kikum3067

11 ай бұрын

"Welfare of people" double edged sword. One should very careful to do a law in the name of welfare of people

@abhijitsen2197

11 ай бұрын

We should not think of bringing 370, rather remove 370 from all states. It is a problem. We Indian's have moved forward from different law. UCC on the way.

@nitinchaudhary4252

11 ай бұрын

But that is not the path that was chosen ? The amendment is not through 368 but through 370-3.. so the question is whether the part of amendment where contituent assemble of j and k rises like phoenix (through lok sabha with no respresentative of j and k) , proposes for amendment and then dies.... was this process constitutional... The question of it being a temporary provision is unambigous .. it was temporary because the clause of special provisions was later added to the chapter of constitution.. How u justify the act

@rajeshseth7953

11 ай бұрын

Where is the will of the people.

@camerong5358

11 ай бұрын

Mulla spotted

Shame on supreme court 😡😡 why they discuss on 370 i can't understand after 4 years see the ground reality before and after 370 what is happening in j&k

@akshitsingh8890

11 ай бұрын

Shame on you why you cannot discuss 371 of Gujarat if bjp is in power there 28 years

@SHAILESHKUMAR-lp7yu

11 ай бұрын

This madarchodu doesn't know what man and woman is. Illuminati Freemasons

@jaisimha703

11 ай бұрын

​@@akshitsingh8890 So you people may want restoration of article 370, and 35A, and resume bomb blasts across the country.

@DevPalliSri

11 ай бұрын

​@@akshitsingh8890Could you please elaborate 371 of Gujarat.

@GowthamV07

11 ай бұрын

Because the court and congress are buddies and they support minorities over hindus.

Respected Honourable CJI and my Milords appreciate your time to hear on Article 370, Sir before Article 370 mother India has lost many Army jawans some mothers without their children and some Sisters who lost their most loved husbands and family members as well the genocide on Kashmir pandits why all these important things are heard are probed and because of Article 370 things have improved and my dear Milords appreciate the GOI for abortion of Article 370 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@warlord010

11 ай бұрын

From which state you are bro?

@pooransingh1882

11 ай бұрын

Once parliament has decided, there is no going back. It is a done deal and a waste of time to debate this issue in court.

When Parliament is Supreme to make a law,to amend constitution as word #SECULAR# WAS INSERTED BY INDIRA GANDHI GOVERNMENT, THEN WHY FOR THIS SHEER WASTAGE OF COURT TIME

@pranjalipranjali2751

11 ай бұрын

anpad ho kya?secular word was only added to preamble,it already existed throughout constitution

@anandpatel1896

11 ай бұрын

​@@pranjalipranjali2751 Anpadh tum ho madam. Word Secular is not in the Constitution. Our Constitution promotes all the fundamentals of multiculturalism and not secularism. Even ambedkar didn't find need to insert secularism in Constitution because spirit of our country has multiculturalism. Secularism is a very hard concept, unachievable in country like india.

@gauravsingh199

11 ай бұрын

​@@pranjalipranjali2751so preamble is not part of the constitution .. please go and read what our forefathers said about preamble

@sureshpratap289

11 ай бұрын

@@pranjalipranjali2751 #PREAMBLE# IS FIRST FEW LINES OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. INSTEAD OF WRITING BULLYING YOU COULD HAVE WRITTEN IN A SIMPLE LANGUAGE. YOU PROBABLY DON'T THINK PREAMBLE IS SEGREGATED FROM CONSTITUTION. IMPROVE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND NRVER BULLY

@pranjalipranjali2751

11 ай бұрын

no ,in many case supreme court said preamble is not part of constitution@@gauravsingh199

Its shameful and dangerous to see such cases in sc......👊👊👊👊👊😡😡😡

@azharnasir7677

11 ай бұрын

Drunked man thats the right of the people of jandk ....bcs jandk has its own history it was not the part india or pakistan

@maarunava2825

11 ай бұрын

Every day i woke up with an idea...oh God ! if those evil ideas may get succeed...what could have happened.so brother calm your brain...it happens generally when you run in total darkness.

Democracy can be too much and disadvantageous to maintaining the greater good..

@arbitram

11 ай бұрын

What is the greater good

@seeker7702

11 ай бұрын

​@@arbitramgreater means Majority and in Democracy simple majority always win.. Thats all.. Minority are invisible..

@kazuma2060

11 ай бұрын

​@@seeker7702when you read constitution from what's app group.

@kazuma2060

11 ай бұрын

​@@seeker7702 by greater goods he means national interest and security my fool friend.

Circular Argument, by Sibal. Parliament of India is Supreme.

Sibal argues central govt cannot even intiate abrogation in which country he lives , NEHRU CONFUSED IN 1950 NOW SIBAL TRYING TO CONFUSE THE CONFUSED CJI MUST know his limitations the collegium system should be done away

Since CJI has been bogged down on all previous occasions that's why Sibbal is making such a statement. This case should be referred to a Jury of intellectuals and all the representatives of J&K comprising of Dogras, KPs, ladakhis and educated Muslims. Sibbal is making a mess of everything.

@networks24x73

11 ай бұрын

What ??? Educated muslim??? I had a great roll due to uncontrollable laughter.

@supdasaaf

11 ай бұрын

Educated or not, the mindset would remain the same. Be it a puncture wala's wife/sister or a qualified techie or a business tycoon they'll all remain in a burkha. As in most of them and specifically in India.

@networks24x73

11 ай бұрын

@@supdasaaf Ammi mar gayi Burke mein aur Beti ka naam Azaadi rakh diya

Face of congress exposed to the country 😂😂😂😂😂

@bilaln1354

11 ай бұрын

He is fighting a case. Not doing any crime.

@guurindersinghsfather1068

11 ай бұрын

@@bilaln1354 he being born was a crime

My question- what sibbal will get if he wins the case??? Why he is so adamant on this case.😢

@indiaxx

11 ай бұрын

It's all politics brother, nothing else. He's old & almost on his death bed & is rich corrupt politician. His family is well settled in rich white christian western nations. So he won't give a damn if INDIA burns or faces what not in future, he don't simply care. He just wants so called minority votes of muslims. All vote bank politics.

@electrophorouselectrica4601

11 ай бұрын

Totally agree with you. Sibal is strictly following and sticking to his points. From his speech it seems he is not even allowing to sway here and there.

@mehracreation6129

11 ай бұрын

Kuchh n hoga bhai🤣🤣 ye kisi k hatho pit jayega

@ambalikadattaroy2945

11 ай бұрын

Crores of cases are pending. How Mr. Sibbal is wasting valuable time of court.

@ambalikadattaroy2945

11 ай бұрын

J&K people are so happy. Lot of progress is being done. Why unnecessary wasting court’s time.

Thank you sibal you gave me a choice now whom should i vote for 2024 elections

What kind of argument are these people making... Are they trying to say that Article 370 was meant to be permanent whereas it was proposed as a temporary measure... They have all gone mad...

@hemantachandra6962

11 ай бұрын

😂 yup what else ... Mr Sibbal indirectly saying that lol

@ananyasingh1158

11 ай бұрын

What u can except from congress

@letmethinkv

11 ай бұрын

​@@ananyasingh1158sibal is not in congress....he is in samajwadi party of UP

@ananyasingh1158

11 ай бұрын

@@letmethinkv haaan toh SP kiske side hai yeh bhi btade

@letmethinkv

11 ай бұрын

@@ananyasingh1158 ka2wo ki side

If any adverse judgement comes, it will be the fall of Judiciary. Government would get a good excuse even for imposition of Emergency.

CJI is arguing very well - but Sibal is trying to intimidate by raising his voice

@balsharma709

11 ай бұрын

Yes . But why they accepted the petition.

@yourownkashmir1035

11 ай бұрын

Bro he argues where they did wrong,and that is the purpose of sc to hear any petition which is based on fact and logic

I am a layman and have a question for learned legal luminaries/ SC. If Indian parliament has no jurisdiction or authority to amend article 370 of Indian constitution, then SC has the jurisdiction to take up this case, and is it mandatory to abide this judgment by Govt of India in this case 🤔 . Let Mr Sibal answer this question 😮. For the fast 2 days, he was arguing whether it was permanent or temporary. Today, he made U turn. What is the credibility of such arguments other than political mileage. Hope better sense prevails on him. Jai Bharat 🇮🇳 🫡

Nation interest and national security is Supreme.

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

Who defines what is nation interest?

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

@heartthrob3885 pehle apne baap ki dia hua naam se aao 😃

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

@heartthrob3885 Apni maa se puchhke pehle baapka nàaam pata kar fir baap se puchhke apni naam pata karke ana ...fir baat karenge 😃

@lakshyavarshney9942

11 ай бұрын

National interest is debatable not national security

@javiadkhaliq7549

11 ай бұрын

national security or interest is smthnh else. abrogation of 370 was political agenda. plus being a kashmiri i can gaurantee u that abrogation is against national security.

Kapil sibal himself is confused now. I too have asked in another video, is making 370 permanent ( as per by Mr Sibal) itself is legal step? By what power J&k assembly changed the status of 370 from temporary to permanent?

@aidelfayaz7016

11 ай бұрын

Authority...??u sd study federalism.....Indian media has changed the attitude of people of india ... federal structure of constitution,it self tells u that individual states have certain powers to decide about their lageslation

@kartikthakur6931

11 ай бұрын

but they don't have the absolute powers of leaving the Union. @@aidelfayaz7016

@ककककततत

11 ай бұрын

@@aidelfayaz7016 authority may be wrong word.. corrected to power

@andha_kanoon

11 ай бұрын

@@aidelfayaz7016 such a dumb counter, India in entirety is a state, not a union of states. Individual states are divided on the basis of cultures, languages, and people, not territories. Individual states are only authorised to exercises their power on populus. Whereas all the matters are related to territorial integrity of any part in the state India come under the realm of central constitutional bodies and judiciary.

@warlord010

11 ай бұрын

@@andha_kanoon andha kanoon name suits you better because you are dumb Article 1 of the Constitution of India declares India as a Union of states. According to Constitution India is the Union of states because the states are indestructible part of the country.

Kapil sibal - yeh article 370 aasmani kitab se aaya hai, no one can abrogate that ,not even parliament under article 368 😂😂😂

Good argument by kapil sibbal..ask first the people or assembly of j& k what they want..u can't force..its conquest by union on it same as happening to Delhi and may happen to Mumbai soon

Sibbal fought for Mr Banerjee too ... What else to be expected... This is just a hype for Congress fighting for J&K ... They cause issue previously again doing the same. Recently visited Kashmir and the locals are shocked with booming tourism industry. Mr Sibal is a politician and he is just doing his job... So we should look at the hype with which this case is followed than the actual judgement it want draw out.😅

@natramesh51

11 ай бұрын

He is just a hire for money wh**e

Art. 370 clause iii On advice of the constituent assembly Keyword: Advice NOT permission. When Advice is absolutely necessary it becomes Permission. This means if the advice comes, the Parliament will have to consider the abrogation. However, if there was no such advice does NOT mean the Parliament cannot abrogate it.

Sincerity leads to success

सबसे बड़ी शक्ति केन्द्र "हम भारत के लोग " आशय ससंद

Bhagwan ka bahut shukriya hai ese judge abhi tk court m hai...we love you sir and always support u...Plz hum sab ka. Sath ese hi nirpaksh ho k dete rhe

As a common man I feel mr signal is trying disparately to convince artical 370 is not touchable, it seems he is falling.

@RahulThakur-rc5cr

11 ай бұрын

Perhaps, supreme kotha funding is delay this time.

Sibal is trying to mislead the court

@babukumaresh9492

11 ай бұрын

He is 420

@raibariminz2180

11 ай бұрын

@@babukumaresh9492 Through out from the court to kapilsibal

@bilaln1354

11 ай бұрын

Because he hurt you deep

@battleaxes4874

11 ай бұрын

@@bilaln1354 not me,you are one who is butt hurt because of aborgation of article 370 🙂.

Very intersting

My respect for the CJI is increased

@harshitsrivastava8781

11 ай бұрын

It's not in his hand.. he CANNOT overrule the abrogation of article 370 irrespective of its constitutional validity. Everybody says SC's decision is final. Let me remind u, the constitution they are protecting is "For the people, By the people, Of the people". Nothing is above the people of a country and their will.

What is supreme to the sc ? Interest of india or theoretical analysis of constitution?

@umbrella8476

11 ай бұрын

Theoretical analysis obviously, interest of india lies with legislation, courts are simply unbiased custodians of constitution of India. Interest of india is subjective to time and situation where as constitution is permanent.

@SHAILESHKUMAR-lp7yu

11 ай бұрын

Exactly

@Chotiburi_Khanki

11 ай бұрын

​​@@umbrella8476in Berubari Case Neheru Gave a Part of Murshidabad to Jinnah by Amending article ... If You can give foreign land by amending but can't abrogate 35A and 370 😂

@kumar-ff6ir

11 ай бұрын

@@umbrella8476 indian constitution is a living document which changes itself according to interest of india. So if theoretical analysis is supreme why so many amendments and changes

@DhruvRathee_Army786

11 ай бұрын

​@@umbrella8476Constitution is just a man-made set of guidelines or rules. It's not permanent.

Why crying 😢😢😢😢😢😢 sibbal

@N-et6gb

11 ай бұрын

Not he but you are

@river.

11 ай бұрын

​@@N-et6gbsounds like you are

@ex-muslim--zakirnalayak4703

11 ай бұрын

​@@N-et6gbu are crying ryt😂

May natural justice prevail..after so many decades peace has reached JK.

In future national interest can be questioned and punishable.

Learned persons should also accept that the temporary is not connected at all to any constituent assembly or any representative commitee of kashmiris.. it is not federalism that is built by 370. If so then that should apply to all the 560 states. The insinuation of federalism in case of Kashmir defeats the meaning of accession which latter is supreme. Sibbal sir is confused A state can't say I am integral part of you but I will use my hands the way I want that is stupid

@GowthamV07

11 ай бұрын

He is not confused he is working for congress the most corrupt.

@vinayakdhulap

11 ай бұрын

In any case everything in the constitution is temporary because we have given ourselves the power to amend it and it's not that we haven't done this earlier. Some one had to do it anyway.The maharaja was stubborn ,the then PM was stubborn and so are we. Case dismissed.

@OK-vw1xc

11 ай бұрын

But those times are different, any way we dont want to lose jk to Pak. thats why this compromise. i.e J&K state assembly need to initiate bill to complete merge into the indian constitution. not from the parliment. Now the argument is Bill is initiated by J &K President when it was under president rule, after that jk assembly session not happend... eventually mad Union territories.

@TheEnpee

11 ай бұрын

Sibbal, sir ???

@mohitmkom

11 ай бұрын

Its not J&K legislative assembly that mentioned in the above comments. It’s the J&k constituent assembly that has to do. It was never formed.

So, Sir Sibbal, feels that even the President of India doesn't have the powers of ammending the constitution, duly recommended by the elected Govt of India. Shall i say, "i am aghast".

@dipankarpal8054

11 ай бұрын

Mr. Sibal is saying that President has the power to abrogate provided the recommendation comes from the constituent assembly of the state. Since constituent assembly didn't exist how can President of India go ahead for its abrogation? 😅

@saishankarmohanty

11 ай бұрын

When the state is under rule of the governor who is the head of the constituent assembly...can't he recommend? That's what happened in j&K I believe

CJI must believe in himself n not get intimidated by Sibals

@subhasishsahooOdisha

11 ай бұрын

Court proceedings are on the basis of Arguments not believe . Kindly understand the law

V. Interesting

Sibal is fighting against India.... so Funny man !!

@bilaln1354

11 ай бұрын

It's his job to put arguments

What about the genocide of Hindus in kashmir

Mr.sibbal,s argument is fair as he forcefully defends federalism of India.

It's informational videos for us

please adjourned court with out agreed with him, Parliament has all rights to amend any article either temporary or permanent nature, Don't give unnecessary waitage to silly arguments

Mr.Sibal, your argument falls flat.

@suryapratap9913

11 ай бұрын

How does it falls short?

@Val-tq8xh

11 ай бұрын

@@suryapratap9913 sir, Point 1 - the preface of the provision says temporary. Point 2 - constituent assembly is required to change 370, which is formed only in the beginning and can't be convened again. It's the legislature that will be formed if they are elected and it's the governor if there is no legislative assembly. Point 3 - any constitution must be a live document and not a static one, its common sense that things that were legal 20 years ago is not legal now as we evolve there need to be a constitution that evolves. Surely you don't want the constitution to be be a book like Gita/Bible/Quran which are books that can't be amended. For people's sake, may God put this logic into your head.

I see an immense pressure by Sibbal on the CJI. If the govt were different then he would have ruled against the govt.

Even Kashmiri people accepted and welcomed the removal of Article 370. Kashmir is progressing fast now.

There is no justice for poor people. Shame on judiciary and the way it works here.

According to Art. 368 Parliament may in excercise of its "constituent power" "amend" by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of "our constitution" that's also include special privileges given to state.. Because those privileges are not basic structure pf our constitution but the need of any special law for special purpose and for specific time..

Forget what one believes. The arguments placed are worth complimenting

Why can we have elections in judiciary or any other better way of choosing Judges and Chief Justices?

Act like spokeperson of Pakistan. Sad to see this.

Anti-national elements funding for 370 case

what a healthy conversation. 👏

Sibbal's confusion confounded.

Through an amendment to A370, the Governor of J and K was made as J and K head of state by Govt of India ( Cong Govt), without the recommendation of the state assembly or against the state Govt.

Every indian should know that any discussion on Kashmir is not limited to Constitution only but also of Rajatharangani

Good show. Demonstration of treachery

A Woke Champion 🏆 Lawyer like Mr.Sibal is a definite guarantee to lose this case..

Sir he has deliberately misunderstood, misinterpreted the Constitution!? 😮

@balsharma709

11 ай бұрын

These are cunning shatir peoples . Read and sell the constitution in crores in a year in presence of judges .

Now supreme cort is conducting a debate competetion whose english is good CJI NODS HIS HEAD now courts should be held in Hindi or other languges so that comman man can understand the court proceedings

kapin sibal is great man he won arguments 370 again in power jai jayaho

Bhai sahab ye banda kapil sibal itna interpt kr rha my lord ko ...he is saying nothing....ye simple observation hai meri ...ye sb observar kr skte hai ...ye hai

Try to understand each article clause then comment please, he is not against 370 he is against the way they opted, second, he is against Dessimination of state in ut. If jammu kashmir which was a state can be converted into it then any state can too. So it's againt ethics of Constitution and basic structure of democracy. Jai hind

Only our chief Justice teach a hard lesson to kapil Sibal on 370

Iam from from Arunachal Pradesh and Being a Indigenous people of Arunachal Pradesh. Protection of ours tribal states and area from Exploitation. Or Else ready to Take up Arms.

Art.370 was temporary only till the Constituition of JK was framed & finalised [1950-57]. That was the only window open for its abrogation. Once the Constituent Assembly of J&K ceased to exist upon freezing of its Constituition, the window for abrogation of art.370 closed permanently.

@RF-bl6sb

11 ай бұрын

Ok Mr Law expert. There is nothing permanent. Even constitution can be amended from time to time , this 370 debate will be put to rest forever after this case

@ArshkhanYT

11 ай бұрын

The elected government converted legislative Assembly into constituent assembly .😁 By the virtue of this if the hon supreme courts cites it correct then the elected government can even write a whole new Constitution 😅 There is no way to abrogate 370 legally .

@sukhenduswaminathan4492

11 ай бұрын

​@@RF-bl6sbyes, it seems like the judges (majority of them) has already made up their minds to give a judgement in favour of the government ,as it's always done by them. The cj of India going to lecture like this. Strange indeed 😅😂😊

@RahulThakur-rc5cr

11 ай бұрын

@@ArshkhanYT 🤣🤣stone pelters are talking about law and democracy😆

@avinash7335

11 ай бұрын

Why not you are putting it in proper way, as the constitutional assembly ceased to exist this article automatically ceased to exist as it was temporarily in nature. So the principle has gone why there should so the subordinates should be. Article 370 which was a temporary provision of the constitution shall not be permanent in nature as in the chapter also its been part temporary provision, so you can’t say this temporary provision will continue till the constitution of India exists because constitution assembly already dissolved any they had only right to take decisions but they never took a decision whether affirmative or negative it means they have already a consent for yes.

Good debate for people with knowledge

Your lord ship The Last minute one by CJI is correct

The fact that judges have not lost their patience is because kapil sibal is not any ordinary man.

Salute to Kapil Sibal

It looks like the court hasn't come to decide a judgement, but it has already decided a judgement and has then come here

Unlike all other industries, these guys have no time pressure to show output. They have no shame left that they have the responsibility to close tons of pending cases draging on for years.

8:42 the guys behind Sibbal be like: Bol wo rahe hain par shabd hamare hain So animated 😂😂

Really I can't believe some one advocating article 370 for jammed and Kashmir

देश विरोधी मामले में विपक्ष का आरक्षित एडवोकेट

Agar Constitution mein nehi hai toh amendment karo. 370 has no good to serve. It's no longer required.

Need to check the source of funding of Kapil Sibal in this case.

Honourable Supreme Court is wasting time on above issue. Court can take so many important pending issues and solve.

I am amused by the patience of My Lords. Whether same patience available to others i.e other than Mr Sibal.

Amazing argument.

Wow, if the argument of Sible is acceptable, then the J and K will no more part of India ! As indian parliament, president, or any executive have no any power in J and K whatsoever 😢

We the people of India - elect the legislative. They have the highest power as in a democracy. The constitution can't be a rigid framework that is un ammendable .that in it's very nature is against the will of the people