YES!! I've been looking for a video like this for a long time! Definitely on my favorite academically inclined wizards list now lol

I currently have all 3 of the Feynman Lectures and they’re amazing if you want to get a great conceptual understanding of any general topic, but you absolutely need to supplement practice with another source.

Solid list. The best generalized introductory calculus based physics book is, in my opinion, Halliday, Resnick, and Krane’s “Physics” 5th edition. It is easily the best intro calc-based physics book around.

@TheMathSorcerer

Жыл бұрын

THANK YOU!!!!!!!

@jazzmojo

Жыл бұрын

That's what I used for Engineering Physics I and II during sophmomre year in college. I had calculus and non-calc based physics in high school and repeated calculus I-IV during my freshman year. I took Linear Algebra and ODE while taking Physics and the 2-book set from HRK used every bit of that math at some point

@mrtienphysics666

Жыл бұрын

The best is Physics (1966, the original edition) Resnick and Halliday. The clear explanation is unparalleled and only diluted by later revisions. Only a very selected few authors can write so clearly and pedagogically.

@joehudson440

Жыл бұрын

University Physics by Young is phenomenal.

@preritsharma329

Жыл бұрын

@@jazzmojo and-here-i-am-doin-it-in-12th-grade

Physics sequence 1) Resnick halladay OR Hans ohanion Pre requisite : single variable calculus & Multivariable calculus 2) Kleppner and kolenkove ( mechanics problems) 3) Goldstein mechanics ( classical mechanics) 4) electrodynamics ( David j Griffith) 5) JD Jackson 6) quantum mechanics ( DJ Griffith, jj sakurai , Shankar) Prerequisites : linear algebra 7) statistical mechanics & Thermodynamics ( r reif, pathria) ............. There are alot of books bt above are very famous and main core of physics

@Class11-vo7mc

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

This got ugly, fast! 🤣

I love your "Learn X from zero" lists of books. It´s so helpful for self-learners! Thanks! How about some Chemistry and Biology next?

@barrilha

Жыл бұрын

@@philscimath9489 Thank you for this suggestion. I indeed got a copy fo Campbell's you are absolutely right!

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

@@barrilha There is no such thing as a "self-learner", unless the person is sitting down with a blank pad of paper and creating the field for themselves. Otherwise, the person is learning with the aid of the textbook authors and problem creators.

Great list ! I recently finished my bachelors in physics and ill say personally feynman lectures are better for reading after you have worked through one of these other books first, when you have had more time to marinate in the material its beauty becomes more apparent.

Thank you, guy! You are a true math sorcerer, always sharing knowledge!

we are grateful that we got a teacher like you

@TheMathSorcerer

Жыл бұрын

thank you so much!!

@aminaafroz7557

Жыл бұрын

@@TheMathSorcerer I am very keen to learn Physics. Will be grateful if you give more videos for Physic students.

Finally, I have been waiting for months, thank you

I've got 'Essentials of Physics' by Cutnell and Johnson, which is a trimmed down version of their larger book just called 'Physics'. Nicely presented, and plenty of problems and work examples. Good for self-study and additional reading.

Giancoli as well as Halliday and Resnick both have terrific study guides, well worth having to compliment other texts.

Thank you so much for the recommendations!

Giancoli's book was the book from my first physics course and i referenced it all the way through my masters.

For most students the best starting point is Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics". Concepts before calculations. After that "Instant Physics" by Tony Rotman. Study those and then go for Giancoli or Resnick or pretty much any textbook on Physics.

Needed this! Thank you good sir

FINALLY !!! I was waiting for that video forever !!!!

Professor Bill Bassichis is the author of Don't Panic, a text for first courses in physics. It is excellent.

Thank you for this helpful guide, I would be lot without you ! Best wishes for you !!!

For high school level Physics, I think the best is McGraw Hill's "Physics: Principles & Problems" . My fav for calculus-based basic physics is "Fundamental University Physics" by Alonso & Finn.

I love it when you talk about Physics!!

It is wonderful to see & hear anywhere, also on KZread channels, like yours, when someone like you talk both about mathematics & physics, with passion and knowledge. And, it is delightful and I love it, especially because in KZread community it is pretty rare to see someone to present mathematics and physics in such way. Authors of YT math videos prefer to present only mathematics, if anything else is on the menu, then it is presented through mathematics "glasses", by trig or by calc, sometimes both, but most times it looks unnatural, like, ok, now I will push my limits (?) and will presenting some little&lite applied (?) mathematics through physics, and, I don't know, it rarely "sits" to me, I mean, I understood, but... And, most of the time, it is even worse when YT author "as "physician" put physics videos, even like courses like, it could be almost professional ones, but, when and if mathematics (behind that physics) was presented, it could be almost magical, depending on author internal emotional reality. Itis sometimes very good. But, sometimes author(s) ruin his own work, especially if there is, "behind the scenes" author's intention to say: look how smart am I (mensa & ctr), first was physics, and now here is mathematics behind all of that stuff, simetry, all that abstract algebras (not just "abstract algebra", rather lot of them, Lie algebras, Van Neumann algebras, ...), and I think, O. K., you are probably physicist with achievements in your field of physics, but, YT is "short" media, meaning you could / can have subscribed followers if your physics is accurate, understandable & educational and with elements of real life, humour & some elements of entertainment. And, that's the catch 22, sort of speaking. Anyway, I think I lost myself for the moment, that's why I prefer YT mathematics, physics or both channels like yours and some others, some of them also professors, who have no fear to present themselves as real persons with both personal advantages and lacks of them, not some alienish weirdos with meta AI-ish - "qualities". (I also have ideas to put some YT videos in perceable future, if and when it will be, we'll see, it must be at least both good and with respect towards followers.) Meaning it is two way communication, but author has leading role, and his/her responsibility is much bigger in such process, at least author must know that his/her feelings (especially "feelings") aren't important, or of any significance. At least it is as I see that way, I don't know, maybe wrong, but I see it like I wrote... Anyway, challenging, encouraging, enthusiastic, entertaining and very educational videos, professor Math Sorcerer🙃😂🙃. 👍✌️👍

I have an interesting question. I know you have a lot of math books but do you have books by any of the GOATs. Do you have a translation of Gauss’ Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, because even though it’s old I have heard it is absolutely great? Or how about Euler’s Calculus books, which were one of the first calculus textbooks made for students of mathematics?

Thanks for this!

Hi Math Sorcerer. I love your channel and have watched many of your videos. Do you know any good books for learning proofs for trigonometric identities?

The best Resnick is the one with Halliday and Krane. By far the best intro to physics I've ever read.

Thanks I have 2 month vacation. I will be following your math guide and this to learn physics. Can you also do a guide for being Computer Scientist (Theoratical) or Programming.

Good timing. I decided I wanted to study the big 3 (Biology, Chemistry, and Physics), but I've trouble finding good physics books. Do you study any other sciences?

I also recommend, 3000 Solved Problems in Calculus by Schaum.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Why do you think there are 3000 problems to do in a Calculus 1-2 course?

I agree about Giancoli. My Phys I & II calc based course in a community college used Halliday & Resnick. I have read parts of Young & Freedman, which I found has the more challenging problems. I have also read parts of Giancoli, which I think is the most "readable", and best for self study.

I'm considering using this to pre-study for physics next semester so that I don't have to learn everything from scratch in the fall. I find that if I start learning something, let it marinate and come back to it then I can more easily commit it to long-term memory and I pick it up with a lot less hours of straight study time.

you have done the best dude.. l like this

University Physics Giancoli Halliday Walker Jewett and Serway These are the most complete books to start! Highly recommend any one of them.

I can totally recommend the feynman lectures as a second read, though, there is an exercise book out there for the feynman lectures

I remember I was quite good at math and physics before I opted for med school, I miss them very much. Wishing to experience those imaginations all over again

Matt Sands was my Senior Project advisor at UC Santa Cruz; he taught me to write physics properly. (He went through a lot of red pens!) Matt did most the writing and translation from "Feynmanese" to English for the Feynman Lectures. They still remind me that I'm too stupid to be a Freshman in Physics @ Cal Tech! ;) During one of our conversations, Matt explained to me "the most creative thing I've done": calculating the quantum effects of radiation in a storage ring. For sufficently high energies, the discrete nature of radiation affects the trajectory of the electrons; it will have kinks, rather than being smooth, due to the electron's recoil when emitting a photon. The design of storage rings needs to account for this phenomenon.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Being a freshman in physics (or math) at Caltech requires a special breed of human.

@douglasstrother6584

6 ай бұрын

@@UnconventionalReasoning When I read the Feynman Lectures, I hear his voice, Matt's and Red Forman's, "You dumbass!"

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

@@douglasstrother6584 Nobody should call you a dumbass. It's frustrating when faculty do that, and they imply it way too often.

Giancoli, Halliday resnick and walker plus 3000 problems of physics will get you through undergrad or other physical science related programs that requires various levels of undergrad physics. All are part of my library. The only addition is a mathematical physics book if you are actually a physics major. Arfken or Boas are very good. In fact for Arfken you can find out worked out examples that translate at least to undergrad courses and grad courses. For those that have to deal with Jackson there are almost exact solutions to some of the problems there dealing with greens function. Good luck. Great video and suggestions for self study. Definitely recommend this video for those who want to learn.

@TheMathSorcerer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for this Anthony👍💪🔥

@Zaguzah

Жыл бұрын

Boas is good!

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

First, skip the 3000 problems book. There are enough problems in the textbook. Second, a lot more is needed for a physics major. This video covers "freshman physics".

Thank You Sir!!!

You know Giancoli was gonna be in there

My favorite intro physics text is the three volume text “Fundamental University Physics” by Alonso and Finn. They are quite challenging but they are also loaded with many problems. The Feynman lectures are also great and another classic!

@LC-jq7vn

7 ай бұрын

I need to take general physics 1 and 2 for medical school. I believe it’s less math based then the “university physics 1” class offered. I would like to learn it for a year at home before I take a class. I would like to start with a book that will either teach me the math at the same time or has no math, to commence my studies because I don’t know the proper math yet. Any suggestions? Would that one above work?

@physicshypernova2083

7 ай бұрын

@@LC-jq7vn a good place to start is to get the Schaum’s outline of college physics. The Schaum’s outlines are great because they are cheap compared with a new textbook and they have numerous worked examples that help with self-study. I hope this helps!

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Too many problems is detrimental to learning. Do one-fifth the problems, spend twice as long on each one, and really understand what it is presenting.

I picked up the Giancoli with the complete Instructor's Resources - all the answers worked out in detail and other materials for a few bucks at an estate sale a few years ago. What a deal! The deceased was a retired physics professor. But I soon learned that you don't really learn physics from a textbook - you need labs and to try things for yourself and just buying a cheap gyroscope and playing with teaches you more about how it really works than the descriptions in the best books. The books teach you the why.

@joelhenderson3723

Жыл бұрын

That's something that bothers me. I want to pick up a physics book, but I don't know how much value I would actually get from it. I understand very basic concepts of newtonian physics in algebraic terms, and I occasionally find that knowledge useful, which gives me hope, but at the same time I worry that I might not be able to find meaningful applications of anything more advanced without a structured way to access those relevant experiences. Physics seems easier to conceptualize without getting hands-on than, say, chemistry, but still potentially challenging.

Thank you very much 🤗

One question, did you read/had some notions of most advanced topics of Physics, such as Quantum Mechanics and so on?

Exercises for the Feynman course were published as a separate book in addition to the three volumes set, I believe. Something like "Exercises for the Feynman Lectures on Physics"

Great book reviews. I am embarking on physics studies from home. It is difficult to find good books for beginners like myself. This video helps. Thanks.

@TheMathSorcerer

Жыл бұрын

:)

@turntablesrockmyworld9315

Жыл бұрын

Hi, me too! Focus on non-Calculus algebra and trig based physics (i.e. start at Grade 10 physics); there are even more basic books aimed at the lay person with limited math which you can develop as you go. Also, I don't your background but review basic algebra.

Im doing an Independent Study in Modern Physics with my university next semester, so i decided to purchase Schaums as a companion text. Thabks for all the vids wizard!!

@TheMathSorcerer

Жыл бұрын

Oh awesome how exciting!! I think you are going to love it!

@kavinduadhikari5881

Жыл бұрын

@@TheMathSorcerer I'd like to ask whether watching simple you tube tutorials for math/physics/cs is better for understanding concepts than reading advanced text books? I am kindly asking for an answer.

Hey do you have any book recommendations that explain how math is applied in the real world?

Thank you!!!

Also want a videos for chemistry.

I love your advice, I want to learn practical physics for my own Engineering business.

My high school teacher used the giancoli book to teach us. I was surprised to hear you mention it for college

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

There are different levels of physics taught in college.

i am a rising senior in high school and just completed AP Physics 1 and AP Calculus BC, and I want to get a head start for AP Physics C (both mechanics and e&m are combined into a single course at my school). which of these do you best recommend?

Hello sir can you plz tell me which one of these book for someone starting from zero should buy

Please make a video of books for physics from start to finish just like you did for mathematics.

Omg i was just searching for a physics book guide after i used urs math one and this just came out

I have half of those Physics books. I found Physics the E-Z Way is the best starting Physics book if you are new to Physics. I will use the Physics the E-Z Way to teach my kids this summer.

Hello Math Sorcerer. I am 56 years old. I was never particularly good in math and stats while in high school and university, but I would like to go back to it for the pleasure of learning. No other reason. Any recommendations where to start?

very use full information .all the books are very good i have all of then i have some othe names also....

Huge like. Excellent books on physics. By the way, Feyman does have exercises to his three volume book. They usually come in separate books. I don't know why somebody said Halliday/Resnick's text is not comprehensive. It's pretty comprehensive for a general book and spans about 1500 pages. Textbooks by Halliday, Giancoli, and Young are all excellent. My advice is to also get a solutions manual for self-check, e.g., when dealing with challenging problems or in case of slip-ups. There's also an excellent non-calculus based course by Serway/Vuille. It might be good to start with a simpler book like Vuille before starting a longer, more advanced calculus-based course. The reason: Physics contains a lot of topics and they need to be reviewed and rehashed or a student will forget and confuse everything (too many topics). So, jumping straight on to a standard course (calculus based) with a 0 knowledge in physics is a bad idea. Of course, if a student has a superb knowledge of calculus, he/she may jump straight to, say, Physics by Young but I still wouldn't recommend it. In reality I see people not just not having a superior calculus knowledge but terrible gaps in _Elementary Algebra and Trigonometry_ that are patched up by truncated precalc and college algebra books but the severe gaps are still there.

@ArnobTarofder7

Ай бұрын

I am 17 years old , studying in 11th , can you recommend me a book to start? I know basic calculus

@billmorrigan386

Ай бұрын

@@ArnobTarofder7 I'd recommend _Elementary Algebra and Trigonometry_ by Stewart. As to physics, I recommend Serway/Vuille. For calculus I recommend Larson + solutions manual to it. A more advanced, calculus based book on physics is by Young or by Halliday/Resnick. Both of them are very good but I wouldn't skip on an introductory course by Serway/Vuille, which is shorter and simpler. In other words, plunging into a 1500+ page calculus based physics by Young might be inefficient and hasty, which may lead to a superficial knowledge. Even a 1000+ page text on physics by Serway/Vuille is a ton of material to master. As to _Elementary Algebra and Trigonometry_ by Stewart, it's an important book to study so that there are fewer gaps in basic math. As to "basic" calculus, It's a relative thing. _Basic knowledge_ can mean various things. A professional mathematician can say he/she has some basic knowledge of calculus. I think we would have a different notion of _basic_ then. Simply put, Calculus by Larson is pretty basic. Of course we can also talk about single variable calculus by cutting the whole thing in two. That said, _A First Course in Calculus_ (even simpler and shorter than Larson's text; it covers only single variables) by Lang should be enough to jump right into the physics by Young. It's up to the student to decide. Math and physics are very vast and very difficult subjects. There are no shortcuts, only paths to superficial knowledge when only some chapters are covered and the rest remains unstudied and unknown to the student. I mean jumping to advanced books and picking some material there is not a good knowledge. It's more for show-off. You got to decide on your path. I hope this was of some help and good luck with studies!

@ArnobTarofder7

Ай бұрын

@@billmorrigan386 Thank you so much sir . I needed that . I will try my best , Thank you sir❤️

@billmorrigan386

Ай бұрын

@@ArnobTarofder7 No problem. You are welcome.

Hii, I'm going to enter into undergrad Computer Science, but I also want to read all physics of history, Sir can you make a list on college physics books ??

Hi! I have a couple of questions and would greatly appreciate if someone could help I'm currently a high school student with a passion for computer science(through which I discovered a growing interest to math and physics;-;) and I'll be graduating next year. I'm looking to delve into some foundational physics knowledge that I can study by myself. Between Giancoli's "Physics" and "University Physics with Modern Physics," which book would you recommend I start with?

I was never much into Math because I never really saw an endpoint, but Physics was my jam. I never majored in it because I didn't see the utility because, at that time, I didn't want a PhD and wasn't interested in programming. To anyone reading this, there's such a thing as Medical Physics, really cool field. If I knew about it then my life definitely would have taken a much different trajectory. I have another book for you: College Physics by Beyer and Williams. It's fantastic.

@paulsika1205

6 ай бұрын

if Medical Physics is still of interest, may be it is not too late ?

hi im great fan name is zee love your channel. I have question, do you think that buying books from thriftbooks legit and secure. thank you.

For people just getting started in physics I would recommend the idiots guide to physics. After reading that I was able to read physics for NASCAR. It was very readable and I was able to reproduce the results. I like the book how to solve physics problems by Danielle Oman. It requires high school physics knowledge but again very readable. I would recommend it over the 3000 problems in physics. I also like the physics book by Randall knight and the accompanying workbook that goes with it. The physics book I used in university was by serway and beichner. That was 15 years ago. Just recently I purchased the pocket guide for that set. The pocket book is very good. Obviously the Chris's McMullen books on physics are also very good.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Knights textbook is horrible. He is so fixated on engineering that he over-complicates examples.

I was hoping you would do a video on physics👍

The books are incredibly amazing but the description links are unavailable

Thank you thank you thank you , applied physics is my pick , and i think it is a great pick for aspiring game devs

hi math sorcerer i am thing of revising pre algebra and I have two resources for it first one being Pre-Algebra: A practical step-by-step approach Gary S. Goldman, and the other one is Elementary Algebra Katherine Yoshiwara, Can you provide a detail review of both of these books which one is better or if we can combine section from both the books to make it better. Both of these books pdf are available on the internet btw.

I have doubt ...should I also consider your learn maths on your own one...coz u told calculus is also important to go through this all books... Which math books should I use to supplement this physics path?

Wow great reviews ❤

In Odessa Ukraine we were studying physics using Giancoli in late 1990s in the Richelieu Lyceum (from eighth to eleventh grade). Thanks to my teacher Yuriy Vasilievich Zavorotniy who used Russian translation of the book (it was published in 1980s! - the book with the green hardcover and two volumes in Russian). But still I see that even that old edition is still actual and good for studying physics. Together with the book we were using сollection of problems books by Lukashik, Goldfarb, Rymkevich, the book that is called "swan, cancer and pike", 1001 physics problems etc. (all the books were in Russian)

What do you think about openstax books?

Why is Tipler book not mentioned?

I don‘t understand the equations.. what should I do?

CONGRAT WITH BALLOONS THANKS FOR YOUR PERSISTANCE AND TIME WECOME TO SPECIALTY MATH ALSO

Thank you 🙏 I wanna be better much appreciated 👍

I took Physics 1 , 2 , and 3 in college when I was becoming an engineer. Now I feel like I want to get deeper into physics. Where should I go next?

You are a big inspiration

My introductory physics reading list at uni was Young & Freedman (I think it's a different edition of the book you showed in the end) and Feynman for the explanations.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

He showed the 11th edition, you probably used the 13th, 14th, or 15th edition.

I highly recommend K.A. Stroud's Engineering Mathematics, I bought the sixth edition in 2007. The first 400 or so pages cover High School mathematics to get you up to speed before you start undergraduate course in Physics. The remaining 800 pages covers mostly what you'll need for the first years and maybe half of the second year of a Physics course.

@LeoNardo-so2sx

10 ай бұрын

Where do you get that book..what is the highest math needed to understand physics

@stevescodinglab

10 ай бұрын

​@@LeoNardo-so2sx Ask the The Math Sorcerer because he'll be able to give a better answer than me. But, it all depends on the level of Physics you want to learn. To BSc level, it's very important to understand and be able to solve mathematics problems first to be able to understand why certain mathematical models are used to describe certain aspects of our observable universe. So, not a complete list, you'll learn Complex numbers, Matrices, Vectors, Advanced Calculus (Partial differentiation, first and second order Differentiation, integration and multiple integrals etc.), Statistics and Probability, Trigonometry, Polar Coordinate systems. You don't need to learn all of these at once... you build up slowly and incrementally and it's important to learn it in order because later maths builds upon ideas from maths invented in the past. I can't provide a link to this book here because this comment might be automatically blocked, but search Amazon for "K.A Stroud Engineering Mathematics with Dexter J. Booth" and you should find one of their editions there. Good luck with your studies 😁

@LC-jq7vn

7 ай бұрын

I need to take general physics 1 and 2 for medical school. I believe it’s less math based then the “university physics 1” class offered. I would like to learn it for a year at home before I take a class. I would like to start with a book that will either teach me the math at the same time or has none to commence my journey. Any other suggestions? Or should I just learn that complete math book first?

You can read all of the Feynman lectures for free online (legally, too!)

any book rec for high schoolers?

is precalcus enough foe those books?

I saw too many who are recommending "Physics for Scientists and Engineers with introduction to modern physics by serway" and what I find it as an advantage is that there are two whole playlists on youtube which are going through the whole book explaining it in the form of two full university courses so it will be excellent to study from the textbook in parallel with watching the course

What is the payoff from reading those books? Have you become a scientist yet? Or just a student

Anyone know Irodov, I have heard it has a very challenging collections of problems.

Thank you for making this video! However, I wish you would have included more suggestions for calculus-based physics. Best of luck!

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

All three authors, Giancoli, Young, and Halliday, have calculus-based textbooks as well.

Love Giancoli.

Sir,how can i collect these from other country?Can i get pdf of these books?

Pls listen: you can learn physics also using the textbooks and revision guides and questionbanks of the International Baccalaureate IBO IB Diploma in physics. It is a 2 years course without use of calculus, Textbooks are from Cambridge, Oxford, Pearson etc. After 2 years there are written Physics Exams. I was during 15 years IB Physics Diploma Examiner.

Is Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Tipler, Paul Allen good?

Hi Math Sorcerer, I wondered if I wanted to be a really good mathematician and revolutionize it, I need imagination creativity and deep curiosity, And second how do I learn engineering because you seem to have an interest in STEM subjects, and by the way nice video. Thank you!

highly recommend the Paul Hewitt book Conceptual Physics for people who have missed out on doing physics experiments at highschool level. Many editions of the book available, and video's of Paul doing experiments. The math/s in that book is mostly about yr 9 and 10 level. David Halliday is an outstanding communicator, also wrote a great book on Introductory Nuclear Physics in the 1950s.

@SimicChameleon

Жыл бұрын

Conceptual physics is high school level. College physics is trig version. Physics for engineering and science are calculus level physics.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

There is no such thing as "conceptual" physics. It hides so much useful information. Pretending to do physics without math is a fool's errand.

Kindly suggest some books for mechanical engineers

Nice video! How much math do I need to know, to read these books? Should I know vector algebra?

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Yes, vector algebra is very useful for the main textbooks suggested: Giancoli; Young; Halliday.

the resnick and halliday book is used here in india for jee prepration and i myself in 11th use it occasionally

Please make a video on ' How to disappear exam hall presure for math '

Thank you for posting this helpful video!

@TheMathSorcerer

28 күн бұрын

You're very welcome!

You should make a complete learning path featuring all of the book you have featured on your channel

Any book for olympiad too?

Just FYI, there is an "Extended Edition" of Halliday and Resnick as well, and it's as ginormous and comprehensive as any of the other ones you cited here. And as long as one is willing to settle for an older edition, copies can be had relatively inexpensively. For example, I see at least one copy of the 9th edition from 2010 for sale for less than $10 right now.

@UnconventionalReasoning

6 ай бұрын

Textbooks from the 1970-90s are better than today's textbooks. They rely less on numerical calculations, since they predate the TI-83.