Love Chris Fields ! Check out his talk with Michael Levin and Karl Friston. We might be getting somewhere with this type of thinking

@WizardSkyth

Жыл бұрын

One of the best

This is a magnificent talk. Chris Fields is a highly gifted individual who can communicate so much clarity. I don't think you have hope of understanding quantum theory without being a philosopher in the slightest.

@vibeymonk

9 ай бұрын

Nothing is impossible, everything is possible, we are in a probability storm or cycle whichever one you prefer to say.

0D = (point): [Math; Geometry] A point is a 0-dimensional mathematical object which can be specified in -dimensional space using an n-tuple ( , , ..., ) consisting of. coordinates. In dimensions greater than or equal to two, points are sometimes considered synonymous with vectors and so points in n-dimensional space are sometimes called n-vectors. [Math; 4D quaternion algebra] A quaternion is a 4-tuple, which is a more concise representation than a rotation matrix. Its geo- metric meaning is also more obvious as the rotation axis and angle can be trivially recovered. What do we mean by tuple? In mathematics, a tuple is a finite ordered list (sequence) of elements. An n-tuple is a sequence (or ordered list) of n elements, where n is a non-negative integer. There is only one 0-tuple, referred to as the empty tuple. An n-tuple is defined inductively using the construction of an ordered pair. In mathematics, a versor is a quaternion of norm one (a unit quaternion). The word is derived from Latin versare = "to turn" with the suffix -or forming a noun from the verb (i.e. versor = "the turner"). It was introduced by William Rowan Hamilton in the context of his quaternion theory. How do you make a quaternion? You can create an N-by-1 quaternion array by specifying an N-by-3 array of Euler angles in radians or degrees. Use the euler syntax to create a scalar quaternion using a 1-by-3 vector of Euler angles in radians. [Biology] Points, conjugate. (Science; Microscopy) The pair of points on the principal axis of a mirror or lens so located that light emitted from either point will be focused at the other. Related points in the object and image are located optically so that one is the image of the other. (See: polarizing element) (Time) = length, breadth, depth: According to theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, time is an illusion: our naive perception of its flow doesn't correspond to physical reality. Indeed, as Rovelli argues in The Order of Time, much more is illusory, including Isaac Newton's picture of a universally ticking clock. Does time exist without space? Time 'is' as space 'is' - part of a reference frame in which in ordered sequence you can touch, throw and eat apples. Time cannot exist without space and the existence of time does require energy.

@AlchemicalAudio

Жыл бұрын

I have seen you comment this a few times on other videos but don’t know enough appropriate jargon to understand.

@maikszusevics1962

Жыл бұрын

who asked?

Hi, Would you guys please put dates of events in the information part of your videos? It's often important to know time and date because a LOT changes quickly in our world, it helps place things in context of world events and it's just good standard practice to date products for record keeping. Thanks.

@TheLeon1032

Жыл бұрын

no its not, it can actually funnel the information into belief perception, the right info is timeless and doesn't need to be hinged to world events/social media, if its right its right, Marcus Aurelius saying what? how long ago?? doesn't matter, its timeless

@ellasoes8325

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLeon1032 Good God, man. Get a hold of yourself.

@KevJDunn

Жыл бұрын

@@ellasoes8325 LOL was that sarcasm, I can't tell. If it was, then well done you.

@ellasoes8325

Жыл бұрын

Not quite. Just straight up advice for the gentleman. He seems to be over-playing the spiritual card here.

@andybaldman

6 ай бұрын

Fuck, yes. Thank you.

When was this talk given?

Did you credit or pay the musician for your intro clip? Matthew Schoening - an electric cellist?

@scienceandnonduality

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Matthew also performed at SAND twice.

@KenfuPanda

Жыл бұрын

@@scienceandnonduality sweet 🙏 - just heard the small clip and was wondering.

But if the Laws of Physics are wrongly described (never explained), the Semantics might change aspects, at least on a personal basis. They will never understand until they realize Time is an Observer-based concept.

@erwinschrodinger6578

Жыл бұрын

Physics laws are accurate at their particular state if constants, which are the pillars of all equations, are true. If they can vary which is unfortunately the case it disrupt the whole image of our physical world... That's a peculiar example of decoherence in semantics basis...

@WizardSkyth

Жыл бұрын

Very true

THIS. it's the single electric💥

A few things here. 1. He claimed the photons don't collapse, however never gave any repeatable evidence for this other than his perception. I think the folks who peer reviewed the double slit experiment would be very sad. 2. Aside from the opinions, I did actually find comparing thought processes to quantum Turing equations quite interesting. 🤷‍♂️

@erwinschrodinger6578

Жыл бұрын

man u can't do all quantum history in 30 mn talk. slow down pumpkin.

@peacelovejoy8786

Жыл бұрын

@@erwinschrodinger6578 hahahaha!!!

'Does his theory actually imply that elementary particles are making decisions? He says "Yeah it does. Just get used to it.'

What if we interpret matter the wrong way, like we're only aware of (light) matter from using the classical method, but maybe dark matter is actually the (imperceptible) "good guy" and matter is the "bad guy," we just don't know how to put aside what we do know classically for what we don't know quantumly, since our biases are too strong and people like to argue firmly. Dark matter can't be observed like matter can, so it can't be defined "classically" (right?) because we don't have the semantics for what's going on because it hasn't been identified or proven that way. So, trying to define things like dark matter through a classical lens won't work. And the person saying "this talk doesn't fit the double slit experiment" should add "according to the classical method used for it" -- because I think it could fit if you put aside what you know classically for a minute.

Me an autistic adhd failed adult comes to this conclusion through association without ANY classical training (bc we can't language). Shes an autodidactic feral philomath who loves this shit.

I thought symmetry has a finite fold. But that is a symbolic 'answer' because we know everything is phasal....dont we ??

@erwinschrodinger6578

Жыл бұрын

kind of but u have to fractally divide the circle into multiple frequency domain in order to attain time reversibility... which is particularly hard in non linear dynamics...

matter of words yet to be found subsets also composition ----

I think Chris Fields should have a conversation with Bernardo Kastrup.

That "pet fish" example as something in any way contradicting statistics is really lousy sleight of hand (or just shameful misapplication of how probabilities work). Pet Fish has high probability of being "guppy" even without suggestion, for perfectly valid statistical reasons. It's so cheap to act like multiplying two probabilities is appropriate for evaluating the odds of "pet" and "fish" as a semantic combination implying guppy based on their separate implications. That's not how statistics works nor how semantics works. He knows better. The combo does and should produce a higher probability, and can be shown in mathematical language involving conditional expectations.

0D = (point); exact location only; zero size; non-composite substance. Not a thing. Not a part. Monad. Soul. 'Represented' by a dot in a theoretical circle. 1D = line; two points; beginning and ending (see 1D, 4D, 7D Symmetry); composite substance; physical 1st four dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D ✅. 1st four dimensions are not 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D 🚫. Human consciousness, mathematically, is identical to 4D algebra unit quaternions with w, x, y, z being (0D, 1D, 2D, 3D) and i, j, k being contingent (1D xi, 2D yj, 3D zk). 'Time' is an illusion. 1D-9D 'contingent' universe has "conscious lifeforms" (1D xi, 2D yj, 3D zk)..."turning" 'time'. We're unit quaternion "turners", "to turn". [Contingent Universe]: 3 sets of 3 dimensions. The illusory middle set (4D, 5D, 6D) is temporal. Id imagine we metaphysically create this middle set similar to a dimensional Venn Diagram with polarized lenses. 1D-3D set/7D-9D set creating the temporal illusion of 4D-6D set. 1D, 2D, 3D = spatial composite 4D, 5D, 6D = illusory temporal 7D, 8D, 9D = spectra energies 1D, 2D, 3D line, width, height 4D, 5D, 6D length, breadth, depth 7D, 8D, 9D continuous, emission, absorption Symmetry: 1D, 4D, 7D line, length, continuous 2D, 5D, 8D width, breadth, emission 3D, 6D, 9D height, depth, absorption Gravity is flawed. Center of contingent universe 1D-9D is 5D. All things are drawn to the center, the whole. That's "Gravity". Our universal constants have convoluted answers. Leibniz Law of Sufficient Reason fixes this. FUNDAMENTALS > specifics Leibniz > Newton

if emergence has a bad rep it must be true...😁😁😁

Gives presentation on quantum computing. Can't figure out how to use PowerPoint. Seems legit...

@asdfafafdasfasdfs

Ай бұрын

Because those things are totally related, mr. gotcha... or do you just thought that the remark would be funny.

9:57 .. everything's the edge of one thing or another. Hi. All I write is free. I wonder we are expansion had used deduction as much comparisons ourselves as those we draw. Please come take my work. Practicing honesty, I saw finer details, & felt deep awe, & more, faster than anything I'd ever asked of law of attraction that I'd have wanted, & um, now I write things that seem as though beyond another's wildest dreams. Yours perhaps? Now I shudder. Lol. I thought awe was gonna kill me one day, but then I began writing on echoes in chambers, & on a uni-multi-realm. Why so to ebb & flow with reality (a story) between perfection & imperfection, a static, as history expands as does universe & everything changes beneath (& including) our noses on multiple levels/multiple times. ..Because writers are high maintenance. (1) we don't liking the idea of answering questions midway through asking them (don't like the idea of beating our heads against nothing left to know anymore against anyone, least of all ourselves); & (2) when we aren't happy, we don't write nice things. *Shrugs*. I host a rise in collective consciousness via ripple back of flailers. In a writer's interest.

Hindu 🕉️🚩