Patents || Part 9 || Patent infringement Case Study || Roche vs Cipla || Patents act, 1970
Patents || Part 9 || Patent infringement Case Study || Roche vs Cipla || Patents act, 1970
This video covers the patent infringement case between two pharmaceutical companies, Roche and Cipla . The battle is for the drug erlotinib. Roche filed a suit against generic version of Cipla and finally Cipla won. The case has been discussed as per the provisions of Patent act, 1970 - India
To learn more about patents click the links below:
Patents: Part-1 Definition & Patentability
• Patents: Part-1 Defini...
Patents Part-2 Inventions Not Patentable in India
• Patents Part-2 Inventi...
Patents Part 3 Patent offices in India
• Patents Part 3 Patent ...
Patents Part-4 Patent filing Procedure in India with timeline
• Patents Part-4 Patent ...
Patents : Part 5 : Parts of the patent document
• Patents : Part 5 : Pa...
Patents Part - 6 Types of Patents/ Patent applications in India
• Patents Part - 6 Types...
Patents Part 7 Working of Patents, Compulsory license, Revocation of Patent - Patents Act,1970
• Patents Part 7 Working...
Patents part - 8 Patent Infringement | Patents act, 1970
• Patents part - 8 Paten...
Patents || Part 9 || Patent infringement Case Study || Roche vs Cipla || Patents act, 1970
• Patents || Part 9 || P...
Patent Case study || Compulsory License || Bayer vs Natco || Patents Act, 1970
• Patent Case study || ...
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) - Introduction
• Intellectual Property ...
To watch all above videos click on the link below:
• Patents
Thanks,
Parixit Prajapati
Пікірлер: 9
Roche won the case in the end, not Cipla, I think your facts are not complete.
It means that was as good as granting a compulsory license
tysm sir. You explained really well.
@parixitprajapati
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you..!!
thankyou , good way of explaining
@parixitprajapati
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you..!!
where they file the case ?
@parixitprajapati
3 жыл бұрын
court not lower than a district court.
Hahahhha roche😅😅😅😅