Openai just got another one-up on Google’s Gemini with its Financial Times deal. The FT will license its material to Openai including its archived content. This means that over 100 million Openai users worldwide can access FT reporting, of which you usually have to subscribe to. This is not Openai ’s first deal like this. It has done 4 other deals including one with US-based Associated Press, Germany’s Axel Springer, France’s Le Monde and Spain’s Prisa Media. Gemini from Google, which also uses content from the web, has yet to reach deals with any news publishers. #openai #gemini #financialtimes #llm
@davidgermainАй бұрын
This is the start of censorship deal, and a copyright deal.
@henrybottomsworthАй бұрын
thx Ania
@Alphadeias0821 күн бұрын
i don't really use financial times anyway ,I'm done with bad news :))
@acupoftea12Ай бұрын
Gemini ❌ Ania☑️❤
@WfbfebetАй бұрын
Did the writers of those FT pieces give their permission to be plagiarised?
@3polygons
Ай бұрын
Every single one of them? I very much doubt it. Best case scenario is like Adobe using its stock art for their AI (licensed only under specific contract conditions), but betraying the artists, designers and photographers by doing so, as they did not sign for that kind of use.
@backstabba
Ай бұрын
@@3polygons Artists made their works public themselves, so did journalists. It makes sense that AI can use them for learning just like a human painter can.
@3polygons
Ай бұрын
@@backstabba More than "AI" as an abstract thing, the hugely VC funded companies used material and databases to create a product (to sell a service to eliminate artistic labor and jobs, but that's another matter) in a way that they have not licensed. By that logic, I can just plagiarize any writer or grab a song from a musician and publish it as my own. The "learning" part is an oversimplification propagated initially by these same companies (Altman himself has made some very ingenuous statements about society, demonstrating a not too deep knowledge about history and sociology (the "utopia" and all that)), companies which made this whole thing with the intention of styles and art theft. In any case, for any creative product, you need the right license to generate a product based on it, that's how it is legally. We can't have the rules for some type of creations and not for others. Anyway, we are yet in the infancy of the legal development to adapt society to this tech, right now it's the wild west, but won't be so for ever.
@makesushiАй бұрын
where did you get that shirt?
@aniakubow
Ай бұрын
I made it :) it’s from my coffee shop that is coming soon
Пікірлер: 11
Openai just got another one-up on Google’s Gemini with its Financial Times deal. The FT will license its material to Openai including its archived content. This means that over 100 million Openai users worldwide can access FT reporting, of which you usually have to subscribe to. This is not Openai ’s first deal like this. It has done 4 other deals including one with US-based Associated Press, Germany’s Axel Springer, France’s Le Monde and Spain’s Prisa Media. Gemini from Google, which also uses content from the web, has yet to reach deals with any news publishers. #openai #gemini #financialtimes #llm
This is the start of censorship deal, and a copyright deal.
thx Ania
i don't really use financial times anyway ,I'm done with bad news :))
Gemini ❌ Ania☑️❤
Did the writers of those FT pieces give their permission to be plagiarised?
@3polygons
Ай бұрын
Every single one of them? I very much doubt it. Best case scenario is like Adobe using its stock art for their AI (licensed only under specific contract conditions), but betraying the artists, designers and photographers by doing so, as they did not sign for that kind of use.
@backstabba
Ай бұрын
@@3polygons Artists made their works public themselves, so did journalists. It makes sense that AI can use them for learning just like a human painter can.
@3polygons
Ай бұрын
@@backstabba More than "AI" as an abstract thing, the hugely VC funded companies used material and databases to create a product (to sell a service to eliminate artistic labor and jobs, but that's another matter) in a way that they have not licensed. By that logic, I can just plagiarize any writer or grab a song from a musician and publish it as my own. The "learning" part is an oversimplification propagated initially by these same companies (Altman himself has made some very ingenuous statements about society, demonstrating a not too deep knowledge about history and sociology (the "utopia" and all that)), companies which made this whole thing with the intention of styles and art theft. In any case, for any creative product, you need the right license to generate a product based on it, that's how it is legally. We can't have the rules for some type of creations and not for others. Anyway, we are yet in the infancy of the legal development to adapt society to this tech, right now it's the wild west, but won't be so for ever.
where did you get that shirt?
@aniakubow
Ай бұрын
I made it :) it’s from my coffee shop that is coming soon