Yep. My super minimal wedding kit is the same.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

You get it! Cheers 📸

Tamron 20-40mm sita on my A7CR 95% of time, with Apsc mode it’s basically a 20-60mm, pretty good for my needs.

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Ugh, jealous of that A7CR 😩

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 for client work Helios 44-2 for passion projects

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

I obviously love my 24-70GM2, but if I could do it over again I'd probably get that newer Sigma 24-70 II lens.

I find myself grabbing the 20-70 more often because having 20 is really really nice - plus it’s smaller/lighter and I usually shoot at 5.6 anyway so f4 doesn’t bother me. I find the 2.8 isn’t fast enough in the situations I find myself. I’d also opt for an 85, but prefer the 1.8 for size/weight advantage.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Great thoughts and thanks for sharing! Ah, yeah… I’d rather gain more on the wide and lose some on the tight, so a 20-70 does make a lot of sense.

@jumpmansz

Күн бұрын

Came in to say this exact pairing. Love having a zoom that starts at 20mm. I have the tamron 20-40 and just wish it had a bit more reach. Then pair with an 85 but at that length, f1.8 is more than enough

When I used to do weddings and other events I could get away with a 28/35mm 1.4 prime and a 70-200 f2.8 zoom. These days I do more landscape and sport/nature/wildlife. Three lenses (although I own four/five). A 20mm 1.8G, a 50mm 1.8G, and my two portrait lenses the 70-200 and the amazing Nikkor 85mm 1.4G, one of my dream lenses. Most days though, I use a 28mm (Ricoh GRiii) and either the 50mm 1.8 or the 85mm 1.4 as my walk around street/portrait kit. If I had to choose ONLY two lenses, gun to my head? 20mm 1.8G and the 85mm 1.4G. 100% (although I would miss the 50mm normal perspective)

@ryanrootphoto

Күн бұрын

I’m looking at getting myself a 20 prime next! Also, I love my Ricoh camera as well, it’s fantastic

This is versatile on paper but too large for me to take my camera out regularly. 35 1.8 + 85 1.8 does the job, crop in if you need. Alternatively Sigma 18-50 2.8 on APSC is gold if you need a zoom, so small yet still bright. If you need something very wide, you also have a 24mm and 13mm on a phone. The ultrawides are usually bad on phones (but still a big help for skycraper cities like NY, just don't photograph people) but the 24mm main lens is often good.

@cyano3d

4 күн бұрын

I love my sigma 18-50 its so peak. I am getting some cheap manuals to start film making with them and not pay a lot for the speed Like the 7artisan 7.5mm fisheye, ttart 10, 35 and 50mm

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

I agree, a cost of full frame IS the weight, which is why I purchased the Ricoh GR3X pocket camera (which I love). I owned the Sigma 18-50 when I had the Sony A6600 and loved it. I am actually considering buying that entire kit again because it’s just so damn compact.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

@@cyano3dThat Sigma 18-50 is incredible

I like to travel and use the tamron 20-40mm f 2.8 and 50mm f1.4

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Oh heck yeah. Zoom for the win with travel 🏆

Zoom wise I would do my 24-70 and 70-200 2.8. Primes only would be my 35 1.2 and 105 1.4.

@ryanrootphoto

Күн бұрын

A lot of people seem to love their 70-200, a lens I’ll have to pay more mind to

For me versatility is key. Therefore I would have to go with my RF24-70 2.8 and my RF100-500. Nowadays I very rarely use something else.

@ryanrootphoto

Күн бұрын

I'm loving these comments because I'm realizing how many people would forego primes altogether and just use a couple of zooms. I mean, why not when they are just that good?

@ElBoyoElectronico

Күн бұрын

@@ryanrootphoto Exactly! And with modern software like DxO PureRaw I can easily control higher ISO levels.

I am more of a mix-and-match for the day's purpose. Outdoor festivals: Only one is enough. Tamron 35-150mm Indoor events: Sony 35 F1.4, Sony 20-70 (room and small space) and Tamron 35-150 (key speech, normally in a bigger hall) Outdoors for fun: 35mm F1.4 and 50mm F1.2 (as normally it involves portrait) and 20-70 on the video camera. Tight space due to weight and can only take one lens, I'll go for 20-70.

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Oh, for sure, its all situational. I'm with you on that 35mm. I use my 35mm GM for a lot of things but that sucker really shines for indoor shoots. Love it.

35-150, a dream come true. 50mm 1.4 prime and a 17-28. All I would ever need, rest is just for fun

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Nice! Got to love that focal coverage all in one kit 👌

@slglasius

4 күн бұрын

​​@@ryanrootphoto85 dg dn is a very nice lens btw some of my best pictures are with this lens. Works nice for (indoor) sports too. Don't need it, but still love this lens. Same for the 24

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

@@slglasius Agree! There's just something special about it

On my Nikon D700, I'd carry the 20-35mm f2.8 and the 50mm f1.4 (If I could have a 3rd lens when traveling, it'd be an 85mm f1.8).

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Ah, nifty 50 guy. I get it!

Sony 20mm f1.8 Sony 24-70 gm ii Sony 50mm f1.2 :) complete set 😊

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Love it. I need to get my hands on a good 20mm 👍🏻

@GINOxRED

4 күн бұрын

Same here! Except for the 50, I'm rocking the 40mm 2.5 G since that's my fave focal length. Hope one day we'll get a faster 40 on E-Mount.

Hard, but if I had to ... RF 28-70mm f 2 L USM RF 50mm f 1.2 L USM

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Solid!

In the last events I used 28-75 2.8 and the sigma 85 1.4 paired with sony a7iv and a7riii and I can do almost everything and dont touch the 50 1.2 gm 😅

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Looks like we’re generally in the same camp! The 85mm is the best offset to that zoom focal range

Here are my two forever lenses for full-frame cameras: 35mm f/1.4 85mm f/1.4 or 90mm f/2 28-70mm f/2.8 80-200mm f/2.8 Here are my two forever lenses for APS-C cameras: 23mm f/1.4 56mm f/1.2 16-55mm f/2.8 50-140mm f/2.8

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Looks like you got it worked out! I owned that 16-55 on the APS-C and loved it. Pricey but damn good!

I do more casual and travel photography in my free time, so I would take a 24-105mm f4 and a 35mm f1.4. It gives you a lot of flexibility to shoot whatever you want on your trips and also lets you shoot envirinmental portraits with nice depth of field if you want to.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Sounds about right!

im a big fan of a zoom thats why i bought tamron35-150 and a tamron 17-28

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

Nice!

Solid video, thanks for your thoughts! I've made thousands of photos on my 35 1.8 on a Nikon crop. Now it's almost half a year I switched to Fuji and rocking this 27 1.2. Basically same thing, just a little wider, which I figured I prefer more.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Thank you! Yeah, can't beat a good 35. Not that I need to, but at some point would like to get myself a Fuji. Thanks for watching!

Lovely video 🙌

@ryanrootphoto

Күн бұрын

Thank you! Hope you like my future videos as well

Sony 16-35gmii and 85 sigma.

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

That damn 16-35, so great. 85mm gang all the way 🤟🏻

Sony 35mm f1.4 GM and Sony 70-200 f2.8 GM II

@ryanrootphoto

3 күн бұрын

I also love my 35 GM!

Im currently on 50 1.4 GM, thinking about buying a second lens to get different perspectives in my portrait work. 24-70 gm ii is pricey, but probably will have to get it, since anything blow prime-like quality (tamron, sigma) didn't satisfy me :(

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

I hear that 50gm is a great lens. Yes, the 24-70 gm2 is very pricey. I justified its cost at the time but I will say that if I were to start over at this point I would most likely buy the new Sigma 24-70 version 2. I honestly could shoot exclusively on Sigma lenses at this point, but that’s just me. Thanks for watching!

What do you think of Nikon Zf + 28-400mm f4-8, 14-30mm f4 and Voigtländer 50mm f1, would you change anything to this? What ohoje do you use, would you just use your ohone as the ultrawide and 24mm and the tele with your camera as the no need to change lens setup, had yo checked Sony Xperia 1 VI, its quality is natural and it has a 2X 2:1 macro on the tele lens and not the tyoical crop on ultrawide on other brands of phones, do you think macro is neccessary because often I see people don't make much differences of macro picture from each other and or education purposes to explore the macro world, you can just google it isn't it? Also hey Ryan, my name is Johnny and I'm a freelance logo designer, currently I'm looking for more works, do you love to have a logo for your channel's branding to have a memorable graphic based monogram logo to help your audience recognise and follow your channel easier? I would love to design a photography themed logo inspired by your direction for you! Let me know if you interested to make it happen! :-)

Def a fan!

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

I'm thinking about starting a website for people like you, something like onlyfans .com or something? I don't know, still working the idea out.

You are a hero ❤

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

This may be the first (and last) time I've ever been called a hero, so, I'll take it!

Canon 28-70 f2 and 135 f1.8

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Looks like a lot of us are in that 24 (ish) to 70 (ish) camp but differ on the second lens. I must say I’m curious about the 135mm focal length, will have to get my hands on one at some point.

Great take, 24-70 all day

@ryanrootphoto

5 күн бұрын

Yes sir

14-24 2.8 and the 24-70 (bonus 70-200 2.8) idc what body you shoot

@ryanrootphoto

4 күн бұрын

Zooms throughout all the focal ranges! I can see it

@mynameisnotcory

4 күн бұрын

@@ryanrootphoto but lets be real, im gonna throw a 105 macro and a 35 or a 50 1.8