"Only a catastrophe can save us" Slavoj Žižek - Elevate Festival 2023
To conclude this years discourse programme, Elevate Festival welcomes Slavoj Žižek to Orpheum Graz. In his lecture "Only A Catastrophe Can Save Us" he asks, in view of global crises and swelling doomsday scenarios: What if the great catastrophe is not just a threat to be avoided; but something necessary to wake us up?
Moderated by Viennese director and author Sebastian Brauneis
Recorded at Orpheum, Graz on Saturday, 4 March 2023
Elevate Festival 2023
elevate.at/
Sound engineering: Florian Krusche
Lighting: Georg Stadlmann
Facebook: / elevatefestival
Instagram: / elevate_festival
Twitter: / elevatefestival
Mastodon: graz.social/@elevatefestival
TikTok: / elevatefestival
Linkedin: / elevate-festival
Пікірлер: 773
Freddy Mercury announcing Zizek , what else could anyone ask for
@zeropointenergy777
Жыл бұрын
Definitely more Freddy Mercury than Nietzsche as far as looks. Uncanny imo
@wii3willRule
Жыл бұрын
I thought he looked like Nietzsche
@markymark863
Жыл бұрын
LOL!
@Rnankn
Жыл бұрын
Sie könnten auf Deutsch danach fragen
@supreme_potato
Жыл бұрын
This is pure ideology
I'm hearing all the hits: - (I run out of time but) Don't Stop Me Now - Lacanian Rhapsody - I Want To Break Free (of Ideology) - Crazy Little Thing Called Late Stage Capitalism - (the problem with) One Vision and, of course, - Fat Bottomed Girls
@Khorothis
Жыл бұрын
In the context of Freddie Mercury being the host, this is perfect.
@nancyoffenhiser4916
11 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
"Storks, how you call them? The stupid birds..." 😂😂😂😂
What a fantastic talk from Zizek. I hope he stays healthy for a long time.
I love that he tried to ask Zizek a Yes or No question :)
Always open an Austrian gig with a nazi joke, always 👊
@grzegorzswist
Жыл бұрын
It's a tradition
@LpSC2online
Жыл бұрын
@@grzegorzswist not in Austria anyway, it is quite a taboo and rarely in good taste.
@markg8022
Жыл бұрын
@@LpSC2online shut up
@toniraff5488
Жыл бұрын
this is why I love youtube ❤
@thetasworld
Жыл бұрын
@@LpSC2online tough shit
Slavoj starts at 4:50
@shaan702
Жыл бұрын
You’re a real one ✊
@Kobe29261
Жыл бұрын
I alwyas look for your comment when I click on a video [people like you, naturally]
@milmut1235
Жыл бұрын
@@Kobe29261 same! But after not being able to find any i decided to leave my own ahah
@Kobe29261
Жыл бұрын
@@milmut1235 We should all be like you; if you don't find what you came for - create one before you leave!
@milmut1235
Жыл бұрын
@@Kobe29261 amen.
I don’t even agree with half of his positions, but you can’t deny his crazy insights. It’s refreshing.
I really like this guy and so on.
seeing zizek get interviewed by freddie mercury is legit cool af.
Text on the paper: Keep Talking!
zizek got the interviewer blushing giggling kicking his feet after telling him he's his type
Slavoj Zizek being Slavoj Zizek, I really enyojed it.
" I don't like this anti-psychoanalytic trend" I agree!
Great interview. It's good to see Zizek feel some chemistry during an interview, it makes the depressing subject matter much more enjoyable.
@toi_techno
Жыл бұрын
He's an hysterical idiot. The first world is literally moving into the kindest, safest time in history. The second and third world just have to go through the centuries of shit we did to get to the same point in their societal development.
@o-tu2vo
Жыл бұрын
The subject shouldn't be enjoyable, wtf with u?? 🤢🤮
Thank God we have Zizek! More needed than ever in this crazy world!
@user-wu9hm9ni1b
Жыл бұрын
world is not crazy, people dont understand the processes and who is in charge
@manguaco
Жыл бұрын
try Jordan Peterson
@niksatan
Жыл бұрын
@@manguaco haha, Jordan is for luzers, and stupid people who think for themselves they are smart
@DonDSelectah
Жыл бұрын
You wanted to say Thank satan! All Marxists practice satanizm.
@GMPOFloyd
Жыл бұрын
@@user-wu9hm9ni1b The one in charge is a drunk monkey on a broken wheel boat
Some might say that his thought is kind of blurry but what happens with Zizek is that he is not only pro something and against something, he sees the complexity of every situation and does a great work analyzing it. That's one of the main reasons of his speeches being too chaotic sometimes.
@hexenkonig7074
Жыл бұрын
a true hegelian
@stevenr8778
Жыл бұрын
You're giving him too much credit. He's just a raving lunatic.
@adriamasero996
Жыл бұрын
@@stevenr8778 You give him very little credit. He is not or is not only a raving lunatic. I'm not his follower but nevertheless it is interesting to hear some of his interpretations of what is going on nowadays. And if you do so without judging or laveling it is even more interesting.
@stevenr8778
Жыл бұрын
@@adriamasero996 I greatly appreciate nuanced thinking on complex issues, and am also a dialectical thinker who can see the merit of certain points from both sides. Zizek brings up some great points once in a while but he is muddle-headed, lacks coherence, and is unable to achieve a clear view of the whole. His ramblings are mostly scatterbrained and unfocused. I haven't read his books but I wouldn't expect to find clarity there either. And it is clarity and simplicity in argument and speech that is the mark of great minds, even on the complex issues of today. For a better Marxist analysis, see Professor Richard Wolff and his discussions of capitalism, and note the difference in style and approach. Zizek is a charlatan and NATO imperialist, which has nothing to do with socialism.
@adriamasero996
Жыл бұрын
@@stevenr8778I agree that "clarity is the courtesy of the philosopher" as the Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset used to say, but speaking in a messy way and speaking nonsense are not the same thing. Maybe he speaks some nonsense sometimes (like we all do, in the end a philosopher is not a demigod, a philosopher is a human being). Also Peterson is right when he points at Zizek's charisma and personality being decisive factors that attract people towards him but none of this means that Zizek is stupid or a charlatan. By the way, as I said I'm not his follower but I think that sometimes the most profound and complicated thoughts and points of view are so ineffable that it is too difficult not only to express them clearly but also correctly. Maybe that's why some people like Zizek can seem to be charlatans, also because real charlatans usually like to blurr their speach in order to hide the fact that they do not know what they are talking about. Anyway, It's nice to have this kind of discussion.
Great talk, and pleasant to see Ghost of the 70's Past alongside Zizek.
Great stuff, especially how in love the camera man is with the host :)
@manuellanthaler2001
Жыл бұрын
Yea wtf I read that before watching it 50 minutes in yea its crazy😂😂
@azumanguy
Жыл бұрын
43:16
@hemoglobbin
Жыл бұрын
He is a very handsome man.
@etownsend82
Жыл бұрын
Is he available…? 🫠
@johntravena119
Жыл бұрын
Well, he’s a beautiful ape. 😉
Could not peel my self away from this one!
@WhispersOfWind
Жыл бұрын
Oral masterclass.
@woodenspoon6222
Жыл бұрын
@@WhispersOfWind Walking away from this comment is like leaving a $100 on the sidewalk
@WhispersOfWind
Жыл бұрын
@@woodenspoon6222 or like even 50 or 20 $ if you don't live in a rich Capitalist country, shall we say.
@woodenspoon6222
Жыл бұрын
@@WhispersOfWind let's just say the price was arbitrary, but devastating
its like the theatre singing scene from mullholand drive. i hear zizeks voice even when the video is paused
Thank you for uploading this!
The last joke hits perfectly.
@Minimalrevolt-m83
Жыл бұрын
ikr 😂😂
As someone was asking I will try to translate the audience questions while cutting them short to their essence: 1. Is there a virtual component in the leftist support of weapon donations to the Ukraine as they see the death and suffering (which the weapons are causing) as a virtaul reality while secretly fetishising it? 2. What is the role of philosophy in the catastrophies that are happening right now? In a very untypicial fashion Zizek acutally answered them.
@liamfrith2018
Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@winterwackoreborn3864
Жыл бұрын
What kind of person would ask such a ridiculous question such as the first? Zizek is too old for this shit
That end joke might be the best yet. Phenomenal!
He came with no chill setlist this evening!
Zizek is so amazing
Very elevating indeed
and so on and so on
Glad we have this. Zizek is Brilliant! Thanks for sharing. 🌍
the camera man is the host's lover and just can't resist the creepy zoom in on Germany's Ron Burgundy.
Amazing interview
Zizek had the host in submission ❤❤❤😂😂😂🎉🎉
Graz, Austria, March 4, 2023.
Excellent.
Only zizek can do a "I'm more nazi" joke and get away with it 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Zaphee
4 ай бұрын
Fist in the air 😂
this needs subtitles immediately
@kyreff4888
Жыл бұрын
weakling
@161cjl
8 ай бұрын
i'm so glad i speak german
Absolutely dynamite lecture, hilarious and insightful as always. His response to his detractors regarding the woke issue is just masterful!
@jorgeabraham3414
Жыл бұрын
what was bombed? His credibility? lol
@bozdra
Жыл бұрын
@@jorgeabraham3414 your small mind
@Baczkowa78
Жыл бұрын
@@jorgeabraham3414 he has thrown in his lot with the deep state
@ozanareyiz7773
Жыл бұрын
@@bozdra Seems like bigger than yours.
@jeannedarc7533
Жыл бұрын
@Jorge Abraham No, you were Abrahamically bombed, ironically speaking.
read the title, totally agree.
Nicely done.
Nice 0I ! thanks Baba Slavoj ! Gosh I love u :D
I really appreciate those intermittent zoom ins on the host listen to zizek
Zlavo understands the difference between us and I, we don't experience any real pain when tragedy strikes so far from our individual selfs that the event is nothing more than a mental categorization which is compartmentalized stored and the individual carries on with their lives. Until we, and I mean mankind can feel as an organism suffering will always happen to the other, we as a species may show that we care, but not because we physically feel the pain, because the zeitgeist of the time says we as humans should care, so we lend our support, mentally, in the form of the written discourse, or by protesting an action. If this continues to be the dynamic of mankind I really can't see how we find our way forward. I don't have the answer to such a deep question, but hopefully someday someone can find a solution.
I'm glad that he reflects on his absence in European class struggle. Hope that there's still a chance for him to be useful for the movement
@renatonunez-melgarp2066
Жыл бұрын
not anymore
This man's austrian accent in german is both wretched and beautiful. Like Yung Hurn. Thanks so much for uploading more Zizek content. I need to enjoy him while he's around. Love love love, MfG aus Minneapolis MN
@Launen23
Жыл бұрын
Do you tshenuinely entshoy the tshallentsh of unterstanting tis?
@trevorthompson9887
Жыл бұрын
@@Launen23 lol I was referencing the interviewer's accent not Zizek's... I don't mind Zizek's accent at all. but I see how you may disagree.
@Launen23
Жыл бұрын
@@trevorthompson9887 I meant the interviewer, Zizek I am used to.
@trevorthompson9887
Жыл бұрын
@@Launen23 lol. glad we're on the slchame page
@jeannedarc7533
Жыл бұрын
@@trevorthompson9887 Glad we're on the Schadenfreude page.
1:04:50 they actually can by now, in my german class our teacher was experimenting with chat gpt and letting it analyze a book and when he corrected it on mistakes it partially tried to argue back and insisted it was actually right. i also saw someone convincing it to "think" 2+2 was 5. it seems to take most things it's told as true
@Artholic100
Жыл бұрын
Someone at somewhere in the wonderland of the internet said this about chatgpt; that it is the most sophisticated sophist there has ever been, and I'm having a hard time to go around that thought!
@nonamesavaliable100
Жыл бұрын
@@Artholic100 sooo incorrect......
@Artholic100
Жыл бұрын
@@nonamesavaliable100 Then I'm most delighted! Can you walk me past that idea, if you have time and energy?
@nonamesavaliable100
Жыл бұрын
@@Artholic100 it has very admirable traits as a result of its programming. However ultimately what it tries to do is replicate natural language patterns. It's focus is therefor not about what it says (aka the info it transmits) but simply about being the best "pattern replicator" as can be. I am sure AI will be crazy eventually but the lack of logic is currently still a fatal flaw. :)
@Artholic100
Жыл бұрын
@@nonamesavaliable100 That helped! One could see it as sophist, but It does seem to be a bit naive and faulty way of thinking it. Trying to find out what it can do regarding to logic. It does make me think about language itself. You are right, it might be a wild ride in few years with AI's of all sort.
59:50 Freddy Mercury has actually made a brilliant comment to elaborate Slavoj's idea which Slavoj himself seemingly didn't pick up. Two men could be using the vagina tubes to have the virtual (technolgy-assisted) sex and enjoy each other sexually even without being homosexual. It perfectly addresses the earlier topic of sex selection and really takes the genetically predefined sex (or socially enforced gender) out of the equation. You can enjoy a person simpathetic to you intelectually to the most extend possible physically - irrespectively of sex/gender compatibility, age, body condition or whatever else.
@Unbrutal_Rawr
Жыл бұрын
This is a brilliant addition. Seriously, thank you for pointing this out - I completely missed the relevance of what he was saying, and because it sounded stupid to me I thought the host's comment was stupid instead.
@jeannedarc7533
Жыл бұрын
Dammit, couldn't continue reading the comment from laughing too hard. I like how you slipped in a comedic moniker into a seemingly serious analysis of yours, beautiful.
@AthanasedeLaClape
Жыл бұрын
@@jeannedarc7533 When only the metairony have a changing force in this utterly barbaric world to become 😂
I'd like to see another discussion between Zizek and Stephen Kotkin, I think that would be rewarding for both parties
❤❤❤
I really like the same blank paper that he kept referring to
It's coming.
Peace can only exist in its externalized form during a time of war. Everything that is outside the war inherits an attachment to an externalized inner existential peace, that is to say that the peace is being made to exist by war, which is why philosophy is inherently essential during that period. The most feritle soil in the world soaked in blood nutrients, letting us all grow in ways we never thought possible.
I love the host here.
The guy is da bomb 😊
:) thats the spirit :)) sehr gescheit gau !
Zizek looks through complexity like trough glass
8:15 l found this monologue by this quote.
God bless him! I can't say anything else 😂
it´s a great interview although the volume is TOO LOW, it would be great if someone´d edit that
@penelopeannknuth5479
Жыл бұрын
Headphones
@koyha5266
Жыл бұрын
volume is indeed too low
40:39 Love has the structure of theology. Where Kierkegaard said, you understand the arguments for and against religion once you believe.
Please, the subtitles!
What an awesome human being
Can someone post a translation of the questions into english?
-How come you made a U turn? - I want to provoke.
"Only a catastrophe can save us" Slavoj Žižek (The most relevant and true quote of the century.!)
@guydawson7886
10 ай бұрын
Dont worry the WEF and WHO will make sure of a catastrophe happening. It just wont be an act of God.
2 minutes he is sitting and its already hillarious.
11:54 I would call The Great Awaking.
Que divertido el título...estamos llenos de catástrofes !!!
my In-ear Headphones are turned all the way up and the phone to... why are dialogs always so hard to listen to? (sorry to have to critic that, thanks for the talk)
Das war interessant.
The host is such a Freddy Mercury 😭🥰
Add volume, please
Peace is always in the intrest of the occupier.-slavoj zizek
@Kobe29261
Жыл бұрын
That was heavy; the implication is that sometimes those on the side of justice must insist on violence or at least kampf!
@austinlee8321
Жыл бұрын
6
@jabrokneetoeknee6448
Жыл бұрын
There are numerous examples where this is NOT true. Take for instance the US Civil War. Lincoln's stated intention was always to preserve the Union and avoid violence if possible. Zizek's quote here could be used to defend the mentality of the violent confederate separatists who refused to work with Lincoln toward a peaceful solution and demanded war.
@kinidiosodlosios6892
Жыл бұрын
@@jabrokneetoeknee6448 that was a civil war dummy no outside enemy
@jabrokneetoeknee6448
Жыл бұрын
@@kinidiosodlosios6892 Let me help guide that little brain through it (here’s a hint): the reason it’s called the “American Civil War” today and not the “War of Confederate Independence” is because the separatists lost. Tough riddle, huh? Maybe leave philosophy to us higher primates🙊
that zoom in on 34:40 LMAO
1:19:30 anyone have any suggestions for further reading or exploration of this topic mentioned here@ the time stamp? [programmed knowledge v knowledge through exercise and experience.... ehhh?]
Turn on captions for translation
Haven’t heard this discussion yet, but I’m thinking of the recent tidbit in the business news that’s tailor made for Zizek is the recent acquisition of Pornhub by private equity firm Ethical Capital Partners.
That way to end a talk should now be called a 'Zizek Closure' 😂
So, I've listened for the whole lecture... And what exactly is the "catastrophy" he was starting to speak about multiple times? I didn't hear him explain or clarify precisely enough Could anyone elaborate in thesis please?
58:39 "I will conclude" *the video is only 2/3*
World Peace
Ролик начинается с пятой минуты
the one easy question i havnt heard thats probably bieng asked: is europe going to become a country? what year is it, and what city am i living in?
43:19 bro falling in love with zizek
Absolute Chad in a Hegelian sense.
45:57 what is the third thing????
Why aren't their any subtitles?
Subtitles maybe?
who is he talking about at 1:14:16?
12:00 min
Zizek has been entertaining and educating me for years. But he hasn't been out much since the war started. I was eager to hear his thoughts on the war, and they couldn't have been more different from what I expected. Now I see him in a new light. The main reason he's not on MSNBC is that he would lose his cachet as a radical.
@sonny19931
Жыл бұрын
He's been very open about his position on Ukraine since the start, I remember reading some articles by him in the first days of the invasion
@numbersix8919
Жыл бұрын
@@sonny19931 His position, I had thought, was principled at that time. I listened really hard this time to see if it was.
@johntravena119
Жыл бұрын
Zizek grew up in Eastern Europe. I have a Swedish friend who was born towards the end of the war whose position on the Ukraine is very much like Zizek’s. We’ve had many debates on it over lunch. He simply doesn’t trust the Russians.
@numbersix8919
Жыл бұрын
@@johntravena119 Toward the end of WWII? Russia liberated Europe from a genocidal military aggressor. But at least half of Europeans didn't like that, did they. And now they think they're going to fix Russia once and for all. I think what we've learned is that we can longer trust Europeans.
@Diossvk
Жыл бұрын
@@johntravena119 Nobody sane would ever trust the Russians.
...you know!
Slavoj Sanchez: Slavoj Zizek and Rick Sanchez from the show "Rick and Morty" share a few similarities, such as their tendency to challenge established norms and to embrace a contrarian or "anti-hero" persona. Here are a few ways in which they are similar: Both are highly intelligent and knowledgeable: Zizek is a renowned philosopher, while Rick is a genius inventor. Both are highly knowledgeable about a wide range of topics, and they use their intelligence to challenge the status quo and to expose the contradictions and hypocrisies of mainstream society. Both are highly critical of society: Zizek and Rick are both highly critical of the mainstream society in which they live. They often point out the flaws and contradictions of social norms and institutions, and they are not afraid to challenge authority or to embrace unconventional ideas. Both are often cynical and sarcastic: Zizek and Rick both have a tendency towards sarcasm and cynicism. They often use humor to expose the absurdity of mainstream society and to challenge established norms and beliefs. Both are prone to excess: Zizek and Rick are both known for their excesses, whether it be drinking or drug use (in the case of Rick) or their excessive intellectualism and tendency to engage in polemics (in the case of Zizek). Both are somewhat controversial figures: Zizek and Rick are both somewhat controversial figures, with some people seeing them as provocative and thought-provoking, while others view them as offensive or inappropriate. Overall, while there are certainly differences between Zizek and Rick, they share some similarities in their intellectual and social critique, as well as in their unconventional and provocative approach to challenging the status quo.
@mn-room4559
Жыл бұрын
This was written by an AI?
@gothchicklover
Жыл бұрын
ChatGPT
Who downed the sound on this? I could hardly hear him.
Zizek and Freddy Mercury, talking about unholy alliances 😅
Byung-chul Han was here
Announcing what is inevitable, to than say he predicted it and now we are saved.
Man I couldn't make hide nor hair of what that first fella said 😂
Two handsome men, perfect
"Only a catastrophe can save us" such an interesting statement in my current opinion. I think that a sufficiently strong catastrophe is the only thing powerful enough to motivate alteration of core principles for the betterment of long term existence
@rodrigomachado5291
Жыл бұрын
Yes. Unironically, Nibiru is coming. In one form or another
@GabrielConstantinides
Жыл бұрын
@@rodrigomachado5291 do you know what time frame it will likely happen in? 10 years, 100 years, 100 years?
@rodrigomachado5291
Жыл бұрын
@@GabrielConstantinides kzread.info/dash/bejne/gXmXvNtmerzSZLw.html&pp=ygUVbmliaXJ1IGFzdHJhbCBkb29yd2F5 I don't know if I agree. Maybe 'nibiru' is just nucelar war. But who knows... Either way a catastrophe is happening and not very far from now IMO.
@GabrielConstantinides
Жыл бұрын
1000*
@gothchicklover
Жыл бұрын
@@GabrielConstantinides it is difficult to make sweeping predictions about when or how a catastrophe might occur. catastrophes can take many forms, ranging from natural disasters to humanmade crises, and each has its own unique set of causes and factors that contribute to its occurrence. i would say that the likelihood of a catastrophic event occurring within the next 100 years is relatively high given the increasing complexity and interconnectedness of our world