Nah this some linguistic type shit

@Ivy.therapper

13 күн бұрын

So what you're point is, is that this type of shit is indubitably some type shit

@faaizshaikh5436

13 күн бұрын

Shit

@Warmaka

13 күн бұрын

Nah this some autistic type linguistic shit.

@TheKastellan

13 күн бұрын

You don't even need the "is" in that sentence. Nah, this some linguistic type shit.

@sawyervance3758

13 күн бұрын

💯 💯

This some real linguistic type shit. No copula

@ineedhoez

13 күн бұрын

Lmaooooo!!! No copula

@Kamil_Srnka

13 күн бұрын

No capula

@NeyamStar

13 күн бұрын

Huh?

@blakksheep736

13 күн бұрын

Pfffffffffffffft

@totallynameless8861

13 күн бұрын

​@@NeyamStarInstead of "no cap".

We say typa shit round where I live.

@SillyKitty469

13 күн бұрын

type shit

@user-yg8kq6sd5h

13 күн бұрын

typa shit probably turn type shit because the sound the letter a represents is shwa and it's basically a "neutral" sound in english. shwa was in the word every before it turned ev'ry. there are many such words which I'd share if i wasn't typing with gray screen and gray letters ☠️ anyway, in a literature major so any linguists are free to correct me!

@sebaschan-uwu

13 күн бұрын

​@user-yg8kq6sd5h idk if that's exactly the reason but it's probably true that "typa" became just "type" with no "of" or of substitute.

@The_Sleepiest_Socialist

13 күн бұрын

I say “shape’a ghabagool.”.

@westofley

13 күн бұрын

​@@user-yg8kq6sd5h this is basically what i was going to say

Whenever my friends say "type shit" I will type the word shit into the text box and send it, it used to be a funny joke but now it's just a thing people make fun of me when I *don't* do it so I'm stuck

@alphaknight1181

13 күн бұрын

Type shit.

@osheridan

13 күн бұрын

​@@alphaknight1181 I can't, this app doesn't let me swear 😭

@jaewol359

13 күн бұрын

shit

@osheridan

13 күн бұрын

​@@alphaknight1181 shit.

@alphaknight1181

13 күн бұрын

@@jaewol359 YOOOOOO YOU DID THE THING, DAMN THAT IS SOME FUNNY TYPE SHIT (woops)

I always thought they just dropped the hyphen in between, as in "linguistic-type shit"

@corykustermann6386

13 күн бұрын

Honestly I feel like that makes more sense

@Dragoninja26

13 күн бұрын

Yeah I was slightly confused at first when he showed the first example, since this is how I was interpreting it. Overall an interesting linguistic thing that seems to happen in many languages for shortening stuff though and I can definitely generally agree with the other, non-titular examples.

@meltingmug

13 күн бұрын

Thought the same thing, lol

@lyaneris

13 күн бұрын

Same, I just see it as one word - my first language is German; it just makes sense

@foogod4237

13 күн бұрын

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you are correct and he is just completely misinterpreting it.

AAVE is valid English speaking im so glad you always use it as an example in a non-judgmental way.

@drawberry_jam

9 күн бұрын

I'm glad that at least y'all have a brain unlike some of these other dudes in the comments 😭 thank you

@Ryan-cb1ei

6 күн бұрын

It’s definitely just universal to English and probably other languages so of course this linguistic phenomenon is going to be seen as valid

@beabzz_

20 сағат бұрын

hes done multiple talking about AAVE and how the internet misuses it when it shouldn't, really interesting esp in linguistic terms

I always love that you actually say when things are from/common in AAVE ❤

@sirvaniss

13 күн бұрын

It's refreshing to see people reference AAE/Black English as just another variety of English, not "incorrect" or "lazy." It's a rich dialect family that has inarguably benefited Global English.

@averagejoey2000

13 күн бұрын

I'm starting to feel like all language, music, food, and culture comes from the black community specifically, globally.

@sirvaniss

13 күн бұрын

@@averagejoey2000 There's actually a huge amount of evidence to back up that claim, particularly with "slang," food, and music. I could genuinely spend hours just giving a bullet-point summary of all the ways that most music from Mozart on is at least influenced by, if not created by, Black people/cultures. In short, and I'm not trying to sound melodramatic, Black people since the beginning of the diaspora have made the world a much more vibrant and interesting place.

@averagejoey2000

13 күн бұрын

@@sirvaniss I mean like since the beginning of time. there's black influence on the Xia dynasty, Jesus Christ, the Vikings, and the Norte Chico. everything good comes from black people, everything bad comes from white people, and Asians are just passively living in the world.

@djsndifn

12 күн бұрын

@@averagejoey2000i genuinely wonder why that is, and why it seems to attract (mainly) younger teenagers. Maybe non-black people see it as “lazy” and then the difference between younger and older people is liking it vs disliking it.

The last sentence is something I would use to make my english essay longer

He be runnin type shi.

@Potato72080

12 күн бұрын

Shi.

@gregabott5583

11 күн бұрын

Could just says He’s running…..

@pauliusUwU

11 күн бұрын

He dindoo nuffin

@keithg460

11 күн бұрын

He is running => He running That makes sense and is what this guy sis talking about. But 'He BE running'? That is substituting the wrong verb entirely.

@Russell-vq6ux

7 күн бұрын

​@@keithg460he do be running

What he’s saying is, is this is some linguistic type sh!t

@YoutubeCommenter1

11 күн бұрын

*what he saying, this some linguistic type shit

Talk about how people add “fr” to the end of sentences, like in the sentence “goofy ahh shii fr”

@reginnna

9 күн бұрын

Seconding this

@luminous_spores

9 күн бұрын

@@reginnnathirding this fr

@al_eggs

9 күн бұрын

it just means “for real” as far as i’m aware

"Type sh*t" isn't ellipsis. It's hyphenation of a compound modifier. The word "type" is being appended to the end of a noun to turn it into an adjective. Your example would be written as "linguistic-type sh*t." Or at least that's how I've always seen it written. Perhaps that is just a means of formalizing the original expression that was originally ellipsis? I don't know.

@dr_beetus

10 күн бұрын

What you're referencing is older and distinct from the newest usage of "type shit." Rather than being appended to a noun, it's closer to saying "mood" or "real" after someone says something relatable. I usually see it used for comedic effect, stated by an observer or third party who sees/hears someone say something unhinged or bizarre.

@suburiboy

10 күн бұрын

@@dr_beetus but “they be doing some Florida type shit”. Is still Florida-type shit… Can you fabricate an example of what this formation sounds like it the wild? It’s new to be cause I’m old.

@dr_beetus

9 күн бұрын

@@suburiboy Person A: I'm about to go smear peanut butter and mayo all over my ass Person B: type shit Here, it's basically saying "I hear you" or "I get it," ironically and for humorous effect. It can also be used non-ironically to convey genuine relatability.

the whole phrase "what my point is" is actually referring to some clausal-noun. If we said something like "this is what my point is" we equate "this" with "what my point is", and that's valid because both of them are of the same word-class (nominals). When we say "what my point is is that...", while the word "is" is repeated, it's only repeated because the phrasal noun "what my point is" comes before "is", just as any other noun would. While it is because we want to preserve the rhythm of the sentence (to make it grammatically correct for standard English), it is not because of intensity. Also, linguistic shit = linguistic-type shit because "-type" acts as an adjective suffix. Kinda like "-ish/-like/-y". It's redundant here though because linguistic is already an adjective.

@OrangeBarnacle

10 күн бұрын

Yeah - I think better examples of what I think he's trying to say would be 'my point is, is that...' or 'the thing is, is that', which are commonly used and seem to be mainly for the rhythm (commas used for clarity)

@MottsusSapiensEst

9 күн бұрын

@@OrangeBarnacle OK yeah in this case, it is because of intensity yeah. Maybe he shoulda specified? Either way his example was quite misleading.

@thoracis

7 күн бұрын

I was thinking the same thing as what you said in your first paragraph.

I always read it in my head as being like Pokémon types, categorizing the shit. "This is some linguistic-type shit" meaning "the type of this shit is linguistic" etc

I’ve always imagined it as meaning “linguistic-type shit” same as saying “these are some Kleenex-brand tissues” not “these some Kleenex brand of tissues” Which comes from constructions like red-tailed hawk. The adjective in the hyphenated phrase describes a characteristic of the object. (In the first example, linguistic is the adjective and type is the characteristic of the shit in question)

One of the most common examples of this that I've found that has been around for a very long time is "Whatcha doin'?" which is basically just "What (are) you doing?"

@martyjehovah

12 күн бұрын

You betcha!

@Conorator

12 күн бұрын

@@martyjehovah That is similar, but wouldn't really work in this instance, since it doesn't omit any conjunctions.

Could you explain the brain damage behind writing "could of" when "could have" should be used?

@Kamakiri711

9 күн бұрын

I cry everytime I read this. Same with would of and should of... My pet theory is that it happens because sounded out, they sound VERY similar. It's still incredibly aggravating to read, especially when it comes from native speakers. But that also ties in with my understanding that non native speakers are often times more sensitive to grammar, since we had to learn it from scratch...

@WindyDelcarlo

9 күн бұрын

Could've

@nicreven

9 күн бұрын

They just sound really similar. It's nothing close to "brain damage", and I'd recommend you loosen up on your grammatical strictness :D

Really? I've always assumed the formulation would be "linguistic-type shit," creating a compound adjective like "freaky-ass shit."

@Alyssa-yp9jt

9 күн бұрын

no “type shit” is it’s own phrase

This is some linguistic type shit

Is the 'shit' not just being described as 'linguistic type'? So that would make it just an adjective phrase and a noun

@sirvaniss

13 күн бұрын

Could be viewed that way. Either is fine, but the source being in AAE makes OP's interpretation more likely.

Bruh this is defo sum etymology type shit

“he wunning”

@Verbayuk

13 күн бұрын

this translates to "he's living" 😭

@eggplant4367

13 күн бұрын

I noticed this too it's called r labialization and it's common in cockney dialects

Oh good lord, he is coming becomes Lawd he comin!

I'm not convinced this is ellipsis. It's adjectival suffixing. You can say "my ground-type Pokémon" but you wouldn't really say "my ground-type of Pokémon". You can say "free-style dance" but wouldn't say "free-style of dance). If it gains wide recognition, it can lose the hyphen like in freestyle and doggystyle.

@oddlang687

13 күн бұрын

Exactly my thought, even down to the Pokemon typing example lol. It sounds like "linguistic-type" shit, so it's being used as an adjective

@michaelkimmm

10 күн бұрын

but when you use the word "what" then saying stuff like "what type pokemon" or "what style dance" sounds odd. same for "kind of" / "kinda", perhaps because it is often preceded by non-specific words such as the case of "what kind of" "some kind of" "different / same kind of"

I always read "[word] type" as an adjective, likely because of some Japanese foreignization trope. Edit: there is quite a bit of "adjective" comments, so I'm filing this video into the etymological gaslight category.

It's not 'linguistics type OF shit', It's 'shit of the linguistic type'

@EEEEEEEE

11 күн бұрын

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

No. When I say "This is some linguistic type ****" I mean "This is some linguistic-type ****" , making linguistic-type an adjective

@sirvaniss

13 күн бұрын

That's you, and that's fine.

@Potacintvervs

13 күн бұрын

That's how I always interpreted it

@abarette_

13 күн бұрын

yeah that goes for the "Trump Indicted" thing too

@sirvaniss

12 күн бұрын

@@abarette_ Uh, no? "Trump" is not an adjective. "Trump Indicted" as a headline is absolutely unambiguously a journalistic null copula.

@abarette_

12 күн бұрын

@@sirvaniss I mean Indicted was the adjective

He is what our English teachers could've been

“It’s eternity in there

Typea shit!

I'd love to just listen to him rant for years. I love people like this

Your channel has single handedly caused my interest in linguistics and conlangs to skyrocket

Need him

The dropping of the verb "to be" or rather "esse" was the bane of learning latin...

@ajoshdoingthings541

9 күн бұрын

Oh my god yes, thanks for triggering the eternal trauma😂

@Kamakiri711

9 күн бұрын

@@ajoshdoingthings541 you're welcome XD

@neucoarc

9 күн бұрын

to be = ser/estar it's much easier in latin languages

I thought it was turning it into an adjective? “This is some linguistic-type shit”. It borrows the properties of the previous word to apply those properties to the following noun*? I wouldn’t ever think to insert the word “of” in there. Edit: typo

@SealandPK

12 күн бұрын

Exactly.

I’m glad I didn’t have to wait an eternity for this linguistic type shit

Ohhh!! Thank you!! I’m not good with English!!! This is very good!!!

Nah man, the "indicted" in "Trump Indicted" is a verb, as in "Trump has been Indicted." It's more like saying "he ran" rather than "he was running."

@oo4758

10 күн бұрын

Your example is still null coppula, since the preposition is omitted even when it's a verb. Especially when it's a verb meant to express the past tense.

@dr_beetus

10 күн бұрын

It's also just how journalistic styling guidelines would have the editor format the headline.

@DruidBarbariansCampfire

10 күн бұрын

No, indicted in that headline is an adjective.

@astroboy6608

10 күн бұрын

@@DruidBarbariansCampfire exactly, to use “indicted” as a verb means that the subject is doing the indicting, when really the Senate is doing the indicting and Trump is the recipient of this

That one friend everyone makes fun of in the group who knows nothing about the topics everyone knows but knows everything about random topics and brings them up when everyone is quiet

In my friend group we knew someone who would always say "Nyeah" at the end of a sentence (it's like like yeah but nasally) and so we started using it as a way to end joke sentences kind of like a sarcasm marker. That has now evolved into "Nyeah type shit" LMAO

AAVE has some of the most interesting linguistic features in all varieties of English

Shit

@pavelborisov515

9 күн бұрын

Tsh fr

this is actually so interesting 😭

Back in school if you were heading over to the shop we'd turn to our friends and say "Come shop?" to see if they wanted to go too

I normally hear 'typa shit' not 'type shit'

@end_slayer

9 күн бұрын

Really? I don’t really hear typa unless someone is talking fast.

@kisukebomb3750

9 күн бұрын

@@end_slayer i'm australian, we always sound like that

@end_slayer

9 күн бұрын

@@kisukebomb3750 I’m not

@kisukebomb3750

9 күн бұрын

@end_slayer I figured. It's interesting how it can read like someone talking quickly in some Accents while sounding lazy being read in others, like mine

I preferred saying like "typa sheet"

I've never seen someone this successful as an English Major but im here for it

This is a true linguistic type shi

If you said He thicc you a certain new Yorker's fandom would have erupted here

i feel like there are so many memes that use this

This channel was born of a very specific autistic hyperfixation and I’m living for it

In this case, the ‘is’ in ‘he is running’ isn’t a copula, it’s a progressive marker. It generates in the infl domain while copulas generate at v.

@user-fg9xe5kq4q

12 күн бұрын

@Zelmel

Well what about instructional stuff, like the fire exits on bus windows that go like, "raise latch and push out", omitting "the" and "it", perhaps to be easily understood or shorter in length?

I disagree with "she thicc" and "Trump indicted" being used for the same reason. "She thicc" is for emphasis"; and "Trump indicted" is for getting information out quicker.

I use the double copula a lot for emphasis, like "things do are shit right now"

These type of changes occured for centuries. Only recently have i seen people get really mad about "poor grammar"

Do do do I mean explain do do

No, what you really mean is "linguistic-type sh*t". The phrase isn't "type shit," it's "____ type".

@Alyssa-yp9jt

9 күн бұрын

wrong

@purpleflower1210

9 күн бұрын

hyphen is IMPERATIVE

I remember learning English as non-native, struggling with these things. And all of it is just thrown away because people say whatever.

I would just say “this is some linguistic shit” dropping both

This guy is the definition of this emoji combo 🤓☝️

@NotNochos

10 күн бұрын

🪞 It’s you, actually.

@_JustAphiel

10 күн бұрын

If you don't find it interesting, don't watch.

@thatoneguywithdogs

10 күн бұрын

@@NotNochos how

@thatoneguywithdogs

10 күн бұрын

@@_JustAphiel it’s on my feed i see him so often that i just said something that I thought was kind of funny also the reason why he keeps getting recommended is because there’s somebody who makes somewhat similar content that I watch so he gets recommended

And type shi?

I've always wondered why people used "is" twice and now I know. thanks

This video got me feeling articulate type shit

Um, what the sigma?

@Segunda_Etapa

10 күн бұрын

He made a video on that too

@r4yv1

10 күн бұрын

um what the sigma

@suburiboy

10 күн бұрын

What in the actual sigma?

No, that’s not ellipsis. It is a suffix. If it were an ellipsis, we could do it with ‘kind of’ or ‘sort of’. Some ‘linguistic-type shit’ means something like ‘lingusticky’ or ‘linguistesque’ or ‘linguistics-like’ shit. It requires a hyphen.

“This is some linguistic type sh-“ *I am immediately executed*

Dude I love how you explain my every day thoughts about words and meanings

"African american english" is copium

@batemoji6430

13 күн бұрын

Na

@lrking2293

12 күн бұрын

How 😂

@exister4959

12 күн бұрын

@@lrking2293 its just english, also they aren't african any more than the guy in the video is german or whatever.

@lrking2293

12 күн бұрын

@@exister4959 2 things can be true at once. AAVE is English and is common among African Americans. That doesn't make it any less English than anything else.

@exister4959

12 күн бұрын

@@lrking2293 yeah but it doesnt make it any more "african" either. Its just slang. Nobodies calling mexican slang "mexican american english" because thats stupid. You people just cant help but put black people into their own segregated category.

Bro is fluent in yappanese

@femboy_milki

9 күн бұрын

He literally made yapaneese into a real language im not even kidding you can find it on his channel somewhere 😭

@Endergatoesbonito

9 күн бұрын

Atleast he can speak actually interesting stuff…unlike a certain person

@GriffithDidNothlngWrong

9 күн бұрын

@@Endergatoesbonito all I hear is yap yap yap yap yap yap

@Eric_MichaeI

9 күн бұрын

he actually did create a form of yappanese

@end_slayer

9 күн бұрын

@@GriffithDidNothlngWrong so you weren’t listening. He didn’t say anything that didn’t have meaning.

Double copulas and dangling clauses hurt me man. Ellipsis for life

my brain can't comprehend that, I need "type OF shit" cause without that it ain't making no sense

This some 🤓 type shii

When was there an African American English

@EthanTheChild

10 күн бұрын

For a long time, it’s called “African-American Vernacular English” which can be shortened to “AAVE”

@GrowItEasy

10 күн бұрын

Have you ever heard black people talk? It’s definitely they’re own version of English, not saying it’s not understandable or dumb but you’d be a fool to deny that it’s different

@kailowrez5126

10 күн бұрын

You haven't talk to many of us blacks, have you? Lol

@Beautyargentina6

10 күн бұрын

It’s called vernacular

@Beautyargentina6

10 күн бұрын

@@kailowrez5126we try not to

Thank you for explaining the main component of Ebonics.

@user-fg9xe5kq4q

13 күн бұрын

“Ebonics” is an extremely outdated term, the proper one is AAVE (African American Vernacular English) or AAE (African American English). Also, this isn’t a main component of it!

Id almost miss each time he curses if it weren't for subtitles

Why use many word when few word do trick

He’s talking fast just like Ben Shapiro lol

@daltodusto5800

9 күн бұрын

Yeah but this guy speaks about things that are facts and not shortsighted opinion

@n0mz655

9 күн бұрын

@@daltodusto5800 sure, the point was he was using the exact same technique

Worked with a guy who loved the phrase "already ready already", like, non ironically, just dropped that in every sentence

I normally think of "type shit" in its context. "linguistic type shit" could more accurately be "linguistic-type shit", where "linguistic type" acts as an adjective.

“African American English “ 😭😭😭😭 no way

@-Sean_

10 күн бұрын

Yes way

@sappyzap

10 күн бұрын

AAVE is very much real

@O_Mats.

10 күн бұрын

​@@sappyzapWhat does the V stand for in AAVE?

@melomeline

10 күн бұрын

@@O_Mats. african american vernacular english

@tyrod8232

9 күн бұрын

@@sappyzap 😭 obviously dh but the way he said it was mad funny

🤓

As a programmer, my first thought was "this must be short for 'some shit of type Linguistic' "

I would argue that rather, "linguistic type" is modifying "shit", like an adjective. Like "linguistic-type"

Gets less and less educated

@wellobush9022

10 күн бұрын

As long as people understand what your are saying it doesn't really matter

@-Sean_

10 күн бұрын

​@@wellobush9022 true. I didn't even realize until after that you used the wrong "your"

@wellobush9022

10 күн бұрын

@@-Sean_ what is the right "your"

@FryManTheGreat

10 күн бұрын

​@@wellobush9022 You used the word "Your" when you were supposed to use the word "You're" "You're" is a contraction of the phrase "You are," which is the type of "your" you were supposed to use. But the word you used was "Your" is a second-person posseive pronoun (Example: That is your pencil.)

I remember when we used to call it hide and go seek, now it’s just hide and seek

That was so much more interesting than I wanted it to be

Now this is some linquistic type of shit.

I like how the captions censor it at first but just stop halfway through the video

It can be used like that but its also used like when u agree or even to show your listening to someone talk like when saying “ooh” or “damnnn” just to show your following

Ever realize I’ve is an abbreviation for I have but you can’t use it all the time. You can say I’ve done it to replace "I have done it" but can’t use I’ve it to replace "I have it". I’d love an explanation about this.

@user-fg9xe5kq4q

13 күн бұрын

There are two “have”s in English. One serves as an auxiliary verb which carries aspectual meaning (eg. I have been, I had eaten, etc). The other is a verb of possession (I have a dog, etc). English only allows for contraction with the auxiliary and not the possession “have”.

This some serious linguistic shit

WE FINNA MAKE IT OUT THE UNIVERSITY W THIS ONE

Nah, thats hood speech type shit right there brotha

Linguistic type shit is more close to "type of linguistic shit"

I always assumed "shit" was being used as a replacement for "stuff"

I hate it when people say “had had”, there is no case where you couldn’t just say “had”.

@user-fg9xe5kq4q

12 күн бұрын

Usually you can’t just say “had” with “had had”. Eg. I had a soccer game last year I had had a soccer game last year Notice the difference in aspect

The popularization of African American vernacular and dialect, as well as culture, has come at the detriment of first world western civilizations.

@colecoal1365

7 күн бұрын

how?

I think for a while before "type shit" came into common usage, it had already been shortened in a lot of people's vocabulary from "type of shit" to saying it as "type-a-shit"

Grammar rejects slang as incorrect Linguistics understands how slang is the natural part of the evolution of language