In this video Chris reviews the Speedmaster Reduced and newer 38mm to see who takes the throne in the small Speedy race.
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 86
@yogzm5645 Жыл бұрын
I tried the speedy 38 yesterday at omega and absolutely loved it and my friend couldn’t stop commenting on how nice it looked. That was despite trying on the seamasters and other speedy moonwatches alongside it. I agree that the 38 is thicker but it wasn’t noticeably thicker. It really is a beautiful watch
@chipnerd8 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for this detailed comparison, very clear in highlighting all the important little differences.
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
You are very welcome!
@chrisbarbz9238 Жыл бұрын
Love the in-depth look and awesome contrast of the different Speedies. Well done!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Are you looking to buy a Speedmaster?
@chrisbarbz9238
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists In fact I am!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Which one are you inclined to get? :)
@chrisbarbz9238
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I'm eyeing the Pro model actually. 🤩 Might even go for the hesalite cause I'm romantic like that.. 🤪 But I realized what I really want right now is a Seamaster specifically the vintage one, which is the main reason I fell inlove with the Speedy because of that case. But the Speedy is definitely in the top 5 of my list.
@Weisnet1995 Жыл бұрын
Couldn't agree more - I do own a '91 Speedy Reduced with beautiful custard tritium lume and out of all my chronographs it is the most flattering on my wrist; I think the proportions are spot on! Great comparison none the less :)
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! :) Oh man I do love the mint look of mine but some tritium patina sure does sound great too.
@Rich-fv5ey9 ай бұрын
Great side-by-side comparision. Thank you.
@TheWatchScientists
9 ай бұрын
You are very welcome :)
@josedecardenasbelmont6742 Жыл бұрын
I have the Speedmaster 38 in the black dial (same as the video), great watch, but agree it's a little thick. I wasn't comfortable buying a reduced just because I couldn't find it pre-owned in Mexico (from a reputable source). The bracelet is a little difficult to size (I'm in between links and it doesn't have a micro adjustment like the reduced), but put it on a nato strap and looks amazing, more for an everyday look. Great video!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@davidinda5922
4 ай бұрын
Buying ore-owned in Mexico is almost imposible :( . Es complicado.
@mkwon704710 ай бұрын
Informative and very easy to listen to.
@TheWatchScientists
9 ай бұрын
Thank you! :)
@TerrySteiner8 ай бұрын
Everyone forgets about the 40mm Racing models. The most under rated modern Speedy. I know it is discounted but so is the reduced. It has the same movement as the new 38mm.
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
Definitely I just wanted to showcase the small size Speedys because I love my reduced. And i always had a problem with the Racing models due to the thickness
@mariangroeneveld74017 ай бұрын
Thank you, very helpful!
@TheWatchScientists
7 ай бұрын
You are welcome
@Wet_Electronics21 күн бұрын
I didn't know about the increased height! That's a dealbreaker for me so big thanks for pointing that out.
@TheWatchScientists
21 күн бұрын
Definitely a deal breaker especially because it is a smallish watch so that throws off the proportions
@cosmodoc19 күн бұрын
I totally fancy the 38!
@behonestwithyourself3718Ай бұрын
I like the applied indices and the date. I wish they made a 40mm of that size. Id like to try on a 38. Nice looking watch!
@TheWatchScientists
Ай бұрын
I agree with the date especially nicely hidden at 6 o’clock.
@kjeldpedersen6665 ай бұрын
I would never get rid of my beloved Reduced. Perfect dimensions for me, and it really looks much as the original Moon Watch. But it’s worth considering that the Reduced model is expensive to get serviced. Because of the sandwich movement it’s difficult for watchmakers to adjust it precisely. My watchmaker, although an earlier AD, had to send it to the Swatch Group. It ticks wonderfully now an probably will for years. But this fact is worth taking into consideration, as the 38 model is more expensive but also has longer service intervals...
@gsvrey Жыл бұрын
What do you think of the differences between the reduced versions? The “newer” one has a deploying clasp, no numbers for the seconds, etc
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
As you say it is newer, has the updated clasp, no numbers and importantly a sapphire crystal. So it is an improvement over the older version but probably also more expensive
@Professional_Youtube_Commenter4 ай бұрын
i like the subdial detail on the 38, and bezel of the reduced.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
The 38 has some very nice designs (especially if you want something that’s not too close to the professional) but the thickness really throws me off
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
Great username btw 😂
@h0llyw00dhoward710 ай бұрын
Definitely the 38mm. This might sound weird but I feel like the 38 is it’s own Speedmaster and on top of that it has qualities (parts) that the reduced doesn’t have. If I’m going to get the Moon Watch then that’s what I’m getting.
@Watchmade Жыл бұрын
The 38mm are very much welcome. Had the Reduced before, feels more original.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment:)
@macarenacarrillo107619 күн бұрын
Do you know if speed master reduced bracelets would fit the speed master 38 model? Aside from the clasp, are the lug holes the same?
@TheWatchScientists
17 күн бұрын
I would guess no, since these watches are almost a decade apart. Also websites like Uncle Straps, which sell bracelets for the reduced don’t mention that it fits on the 38 (i think they would if it did)
@keithchegwin1222 Жыл бұрын
I think the light blue one is my favourite
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
It's lovely
@MrBarbarouseАй бұрын
Does the reduced has more presence due to that extra 1mm and the plain black bezel?
@TheWatchScientists
Ай бұрын
I think it looks a bit more broad because it sits flat and seems wider
@eyebidder2 ай бұрын
The butterfly closure is very difficult to open so be aware! I'm going to change out the bracelet to something with a more user friendly clasp.
@larsson1899 Жыл бұрын
Immer gute Videos , weiter so. Von wann ist Deine Speedmaster Reduced ? Schaut echt noch klasse aus , schon eine Revision in der Vergangenheit gemacht ? Wenn Speedy , dann auch nur die Reduced, ,mit den 39mm und dem Automatikwerk die Perfekte Uhr.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Vielen Dank! Sie ist von 1999 aber wurde erst 2003 verkauft. Ich habe sie als „mint“ gekauft und sie war wirklich perfekt. Die Service Geschichte ist leider nicht bekannt, allerdings läuft sie perfekt +- 3 bis 4 Sekunden. Auf meinem Handgelenk sitzt sie auch perfekt 😊
@larsson1899
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists , klingt gut. Bei den Gangwerten ist dann allerdings keine Revision nötig, top Werte 👍. Schon echt Wahnsinn wie die Preise bei der Reduced angezogen haben. Ich bin auf der Suche nach einer, sollte dann aber eine Revision in naher Vergangenheit bekommen haben. Leider gibt's auch viel Mist bei dem Modell, oftmals total runter poliert. Viele Grüße
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Ja das ist schade, vor allem weil der Kontrast zwischen poliert und gebürstet sehr schön auf diesem Gehäuse ist. Viele Grüße!
@nele9378 Жыл бұрын
very informative video! The 38mm just doesn't do it for me, the reduced is a much better iteration imo
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks I agree ;)
@omizzy22 күн бұрын
What about the servicing issues of the reduced?
@TheWatchScientists
21 күн бұрын
Can be difficult to service but generally Omega charges based on the fact that it’s a chronograph. So might be no different to other chronographs from Omega.
@ChrisKuiperBelt Жыл бұрын
There is so much misinformation about water resistance in the watch community, I honestly don't know where it is all coming from. If a watch has a 30M resistance rating and it's from a reputable brand, they have actually tested it at 30M pressure. No not that 'exact' watch probably unless it is a 'divers resistance', where they test your exact watch. Regardless, 30M resistance is ok for EVERYTHING so long as you don't dive down near 30M. Pressure is pressure, it doesn't matter where it is coming from or what is causing it, air or water. If the water coming out of your shower head was anywhere near the pressure at 30M, it would literally rip your skin off. Obviously for serious diving, get a dive watch with a screw down crown. The screwing down of the crown does NOT improve the water seal itself unless there is a second gasket on the underside of the crown, which there may or may not be depending on the design. The screw down crown prevents a 'slipping seal' from occurring, which can lower the effective pressure resistance of a seal. My credentials are as a mechanical engineer, and if you don't believe me then go buy a 30M cheap Seiko off Amazon and go swimming, even free diving with it. Someone did a good post of water resistance myths here: www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/zw86rq/myth_busting_i_talked_to_my_watchmaker_about/
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
I don’t think it has so much to do with misinformation, we’re very aware that it could take it but just overly cautious because of the prices of these watches. So from a psychological perspective we prefer to have a bigger buffer to feel like nothing’s going to happen. At least that’s the case for me. Then with Chrono’s I’m even more cautious because of the pushers. That’s why for myself as a rule, I don’t go swimming with watches that aren’t at least 100m WR even if this is being overly cautious (Nele)
@ChrisKuiperBelt
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists To each their own, I'd just be more worried about accidently hitting your watch on some hard object and taking a chunk out of the bezel instead of if it will survive a swim or not.
@truxton10008 ай бұрын
I like both, but the price of the new one?! I think this just shows that Speedmasters are really good value on the second hand market, I would never fork out 5600 on the new one though….
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
Yeah at that point it’s worth going for the Professional imo (Nele)
@cebb-gj6wi Жыл бұрын
Useful! What size is your wrist? :) Will be helpful for me to know, so I can compare.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! 18cm as stated in the video :)
@cebb-gj6wi
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a response. Did you really say so? I must have missed it. You have 18cm but the reduce looks perfect on you! I have about 16,5 cm, and I think it looks kinda small on me in certain instances.. weird how that works
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
I didn’t say it but i wrote it on the wristshot. It also depends on the shape of your wrist and at the end of the day also your preferences.
@JudasIscariot8111 ай бұрын
Would it look too small on a 7.5-inch wrist?
@TheWatchScientists
11 ай бұрын
I would say yes but it depends on your preference. My wrist in the video is 18cm (7.1 inch). If you consider getting one try to get you hands on one and see for yourself
@JudasIscariot81
11 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists makes sense. I will try just that. Thanks!
@64Sq10 ай бұрын
vintage always
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
I agree 😉
@h0llyw00dhoward7 Жыл бұрын
I got the light blue dial with the navy bezel.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
How are you enjoying the watch?
@h0llyw00dhoward7
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I love it! I’m going to give that one to my oldest son when he graduate High School and when I get the 300m (green) that’s going to my youngest. I love Omega.
@Professional_Youtube_Commenter4 ай бұрын
ruduce subdial spacing is way better. on the 42mm it looks too close together and they made the indices longer to fill the outside space.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
I agree the spacing looks nice. Just to clarify the video shows the 38 versus the reduced. The reduced is 39,5mm
@MrBarbarouse2 ай бұрын
I prefer the reduced but last version with sapphire glass and updated clasp. I would prefer the 38 if it was thinner. That 14,7mm is too thick!
@TheWatchScientists
2 ай бұрын
I don’t have an issue with the hesalite crystal but a better clasp would be great. The 38 is way too thick, i don’t understand how they can’t get it thinner than the modular movement
@JamesAlexander14 Жыл бұрын
Both of them are too small for me. I’d stick with the Moonwatch!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Sure this is mainly for people that are already looking for a smaller and/or automatic version of the Moonwatch. Thanks for watching anyway!
@keefw36110 ай бұрын
Speedmaster racing ober these two
@stellarboy783 ай бұрын
Wish they did the 38 without the calendar. Would reduce the thickness, plus I won’t wear it every day, which makes the calendar function annoying to keep having to update it every time I take it out and put it on.
@TheWatchScientists
3 ай бұрын
Go for a reduced in that case!
@ivanmirones922010 ай бұрын
Copied the placement of the three dials from the B. Lunar Pilot.
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
The theee subdials, now referred to as tri-compax, has existed long before the Lunar Pilot. It’s like saying it stole the round dial from the Rolex Submariner
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I'm referring to the position of the three dials, they are spaced out as oposed to the original Speedmaster. This configuration is similar as the one used on the original Lunar Pilot worn by Dave Scott (1971)and reisued by Bulova and by the way ,Omega is also using the "Butterfly" clasp used on the Lunar P.
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists Compare the position of the three dials among the Original Speedy, Reduced Speedy and Lunar Pilot and you'll see.
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
The subdials are smore spaced out that is true but this is not designed by Omega but a consequence of the Dubois Depraz chronograph module. Also to me none of these things are „copying“, a butterfly clasp is used by countless watches (vintage Reduced does not btw). I doubt that Bulova invented it.
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists Exactly ,the reduced resembles the LP and on top use the BF. clasp.
@joerichardson61074 ай бұрын
Best small speedy is the racing. Better movement also.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
That is a really cool looking piece
@maxinahunt86522 күн бұрын
As a woman I only like the original black style. All the others are too foo foo. Don’t ruin a good watch like that. Get a Cartier instead if you want that kind of watch.
Пікірлер: 86
I tried the speedy 38 yesterday at omega and absolutely loved it and my friend couldn’t stop commenting on how nice it looked. That was despite trying on the seamasters and other speedy moonwatches alongside it. I agree that the 38 is thicker but it wasn’t noticeably thicker. It really is a beautiful watch
Thanks a lot for this detailed comparison, very clear in highlighting all the important little differences.
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
You are very welcome!
Love the in-depth look and awesome contrast of the different Speedies. Well done!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Are you looking to buy a Speedmaster?
@chrisbarbz9238
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists In fact I am!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Which one are you inclined to get? :)
@chrisbarbz9238
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I'm eyeing the Pro model actually. 🤩 Might even go for the hesalite cause I'm romantic like that.. 🤪 But I realized what I really want right now is a Seamaster specifically the vintage one, which is the main reason I fell inlove with the Speedy because of that case. But the Speedy is definitely in the top 5 of my list.
Couldn't agree more - I do own a '91 Speedy Reduced with beautiful custard tritium lume and out of all my chronographs it is the most flattering on my wrist; I think the proportions are spot on! Great comparison none the less :)
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thank you! :) Oh man I do love the mint look of mine but some tritium patina sure does sound great too.
Great side-by-side comparision. Thank you.
@TheWatchScientists
9 ай бұрын
You are very welcome :)
I have the Speedmaster 38 in the black dial (same as the video), great watch, but agree it's a little thick. I wasn't comfortable buying a reduced just because I couldn't find it pre-owned in Mexico (from a reputable source). The bracelet is a little difficult to size (I'm in between links and it doesn't have a micro adjustment like the reduced), but put it on a nato strap and looks amazing, more for an everyday look. Great video!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@davidinda5922
4 ай бұрын
Buying ore-owned in Mexico is almost imposible :( . Es complicado.
Informative and very easy to listen to.
@TheWatchScientists
9 ай бұрын
Thank you! :)
Everyone forgets about the 40mm Racing models. The most under rated modern Speedy. I know it is discounted but so is the reduced. It has the same movement as the new 38mm.
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
Definitely I just wanted to showcase the small size Speedys because I love my reduced. And i always had a problem with the Racing models due to the thickness
Thank you, very helpful!
@TheWatchScientists
7 ай бұрын
You are welcome
I didn't know about the increased height! That's a dealbreaker for me so big thanks for pointing that out.
@TheWatchScientists
21 күн бұрын
Definitely a deal breaker especially because it is a smallish watch so that throws off the proportions
I totally fancy the 38!
I like the applied indices and the date. I wish they made a 40mm of that size. Id like to try on a 38. Nice looking watch!
@TheWatchScientists
Ай бұрын
I agree with the date especially nicely hidden at 6 o’clock.
I would never get rid of my beloved Reduced. Perfect dimensions for me, and it really looks much as the original Moon Watch. But it’s worth considering that the Reduced model is expensive to get serviced. Because of the sandwich movement it’s difficult for watchmakers to adjust it precisely. My watchmaker, although an earlier AD, had to send it to the Swatch Group. It ticks wonderfully now an probably will for years. But this fact is worth taking into consideration, as the 38 model is more expensive but also has longer service intervals...
What do you think of the differences between the reduced versions? The “newer” one has a deploying clasp, no numbers for the seconds, etc
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
As you say it is newer, has the updated clasp, no numbers and importantly a sapphire crystal. So it is an improvement over the older version but probably also more expensive
i like the subdial detail on the 38, and bezel of the reduced.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
The 38 has some very nice designs (especially if you want something that’s not too close to the professional) but the thickness really throws me off
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
Great username btw 😂
Definitely the 38mm. This might sound weird but I feel like the 38 is it’s own Speedmaster and on top of that it has qualities (parts) that the reduced doesn’t have. If I’m going to get the Moon Watch then that’s what I’m getting.
The 38mm are very much welcome. Had the Reduced before, feels more original.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment:)
Do you know if speed master reduced bracelets would fit the speed master 38 model? Aside from the clasp, are the lug holes the same?
@TheWatchScientists
17 күн бұрын
I would guess no, since these watches are almost a decade apart. Also websites like Uncle Straps, which sell bracelets for the reduced don’t mention that it fits on the 38 (i think they would if it did)
I think the light blue one is my favourite
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
It's lovely
Does the reduced has more presence due to that extra 1mm and the plain black bezel?
@TheWatchScientists
Ай бұрын
I think it looks a bit more broad because it sits flat and seems wider
The butterfly closure is very difficult to open so be aware! I'm going to change out the bracelet to something with a more user friendly clasp.
Immer gute Videos , weiter so. Von wann ist Deine Speedmaster Reduced ? Schaut echt noch klasse aus , schon eine Revision in der Vergangenheit gemacht ? Wenn Speedy , dann auch nur die Reduced, ,mit den 39mm und dem Automatikwerk die Perfekte Uhr.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Vielen Dank! Sie ist von 1999 aber wurde erst 2003 verkauft. Ich habe sie als „mint“ gekauft und sie war wirklich perfekt. Die Service Geschichte ist leider nicht bekannt, allerdings läuft sie perfekt +- 3 bis 4 Sekunden. Auf meinem Handgelenk sitzt sie auch perfekt 😊
@larsson1899
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists , klingt gut. Bei den Gangwerten ist dann allerdings keine Revision nötig, top Werte 👍. Schon echt Wahnsinn wie die Preise bei der Reduced angezogen haben. Ich bin auf der Suche nach einer, sollte dann aber eine Revision in naher Vergangenheit bekommen haben. Leider gibt's auch viel Mist bei dem Modell, oftmals total runter poliert. Viele Grüße
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Ja das ist schade, vor allem weil der Kontrast zwischen poliert und gebürstet sehr schön auf diesem Gehäuse ist. Viele Grüße!
very informative video! The 38mm just doesn't do it for me, the reduced is a much better iteration imo
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks I agree ;)
What about the servicing issues of the reduced?
@TheWatchScientists
21 күн бұрын
Can be difficult to service but generally Omega charges based on the fact that it’s a chronograph. So might be no different to other chronographs from Omega.
There is so much misinformation about water resistance in the watch community, I honestly don't know where it is all coming from. If a watch has a 30M resistance rating and it's from a reputable brand, they have actually tested it at 30M pressure. No not that 'exact' watch probably unless it is a 'divers resistance', where they test your exact watch. Regardless, 30M resistance is ok for EVERYTHING so long as you don't dive down near 30M. Pressure is pressure, it doesn't matter where it is coming from or what is causing it, air or water. If the water coming out of your shower head was anywhere near the pressure at 30M, it would literally rip your skin off. Obviously for serious diving, get a dive watch with a screw down crown. The screwing down of the crown does NOT improve the water seal itself unless there is a second gasket on the underside of the crown, which there may or may not be depending on the design. The screw down crown prevents a 'slipping seal' from occurring, which can lower the effective pressure resistance of a seal. My credentials are as a mechanical engineer, and if you don't believe me then go buy a 30M cheap Seiko off Amazon and go swimming, even free diving with it. Someone did a good post of water resistance myths here: www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/zw86rq/myth_busting_i_talked_to_my_watchmaker_about/
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
I don’t think it has so much to do with misinformation, we’re very aware that it could take it but just overly cautious because of the prices of these watches. So from a psychological perspective we prefer to have a bigger buffer to feel like nothing’s going to happen. At least that’s the case for me. Then with Chrono’s I’m even more cautious because of the pushers. That’s why for myself as a rule, I don’t go swimming with watches that aren’t at least 100m WR even if this is being overly cautious (Nele)
@ChrisKuiperBelt
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists To each their own, I'd just be more worried about accidently hitting your watch on some hard object and taking a chunk out of the bezel instead of if it will survive a swim or not.
I like both, but the price of the new one?! I think this just shows that Speedmasters are really good value on the second hand market, I would never fork out 5600 on the new one though….
@TheWatchScientists
8 ай бұрын
Yeah at that point it’s worth going for the Professional imo (Nele)
Useful! What size is your wrist? :) Will be helpful for me to know, so I can compare.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! 18cm as stated in the video :)
@cebb-gj6wi
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a response. Did you really say so? I must have missed it. You have 18cm but the reduce looks perfect on you! I have about 16,5 cm, and I think it looks kinda small on me in certain instances.. weird how that works
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
I didn’t say it but i wrote it on the wristshot. It also depends on the shape of your wrist and at the end of the day also your preferences.
Would it look too small on a 7.5-inch wrist?
@TheWatchScientists
11 ай бұрын
I would say yes but it depends on your preference. My wrist in the video is 18cm (7.1 inch). If you consider getting one try to get you hands on one and see for yourself
@JudasIscariot81
11 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists makes sense. I will try just that. Thanks!
vintage always
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
I agree 😉
I got the light blue dial with the navy bezel.
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
How are you enjoying the watch?
@h0llyw00dhoward7
Жыл бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I love it! I’m going to give that one to my oldest son when he graduate High School and when I get the 300m (green) that’s going to my youngest. I love Omega.
ruduce subdial spacing is way better. on the 42mm it looks too close together and they made the indices longer to fill the outside space.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
I agree the spacing looks nice. Just to clarify the video shows the 38 versus the reduced. The reduced is 39,5mm
I prefer the reduced but last version with sapphire glass and updated clasp. I would prefer the 38 if it was thinner. That 14,7mm is too thick!
@TheWatchScientists
2 ай бұрын
I don’t have an issue with the hesalite crystal but a better clasp would be great. The 38 is way too thick, i don’t understand how they can’t get it thinner than the modular movement
Both of them are too small for me. I’d stick with the Moonwatch!
@TheWatchScientists
Жыл бұрын
Sure this is mainly for people that are already looking for a smaller and/or automatic version of the Moonwatch. Thanks for watching anyway!
Speedmaster racing ober these two
Wish they did the 38 without the calendar. Would reduce the thickness, plus I won’t wear it every day, which makes the calendar function annoying to keep having to update it every time I take it out and put it on.
@TheWatchScientists
3 ай бұрын
Go for a reduced in that case!
Copied the placement of the three dials from the B. Lunar Pilot.
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
The theee subdials, now referred to as tri-compax, has existed long before the Lunar Pilot. It’s like saying it stole the round dial from the Rolex Submariner
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists I'm referring to the position of the three dials, they are spaced out as oposed to the original Speedmaster. This configuration is similar as the one used on the original Lunar Pilot worn by Dave Scott (1971)and reisued by Bulova and by the way ,Omega is also using the "Butterfly" clasp used on the Lunar P.
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists Compare the position of the three dials among the Original Speedy, Reduced Speedy and Lunar Pilot and you'll see.
@TheWatchScientists
10 ай бұрын
The subdials are smore spaced out that is true but this is not designed by Omega but a consequence of the Dubois Depraz chronograph module. Also to me none of these things are „copying“, a butterfly clasp is used by countless watches (vintage Reduced does not btw). I doubt that Bulova invented it.
@ivanmirones9220
10 ай бұрын
@@TheWatchScientists Exactly ,the reduced resembles the LP and on top use the BF. clasp.
Best small speedy is the racing. Better movement also.
@TheWatchScientists
4 ай бұрын
That is a really cool looking piece
As a woman I only like the original black style. All the others are too foo foo. Don’t ruin a good watch like that. Get a Cartier instead if you want that kind of watch.