Loving the extra commentary and little jokes like the Armarty kicking 57 goals on Adelaide 🤣. Would love to see this energy in the rest of the season if its sustainable

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

I'm usually short on time but definitely will try to keep that energy for the rest of the season.

Jamie Elliott goal of the year, what a great goal by the new look Elliot 🤣

@roblincduck

Ай бұрын

Jamie Elliot's contender is Bobby? Thats what he said! Is that not obvious?

@user-fg5lq2dg4h

Ай бұрын

In the video he says goal of the year not mark of the year. Op is just making fun of that.

@VCS7083

Ай бұрын

@@user-fg5lq2dg4hand he also says Elliott instead of hill

When bobby hill took that great mark he called him Jamie Elliot

@HorizonOfHope

Ай бұрын

Also said goal of the year. Lol

@InnocentComeng

Ай бұрын

How t f does he mess that up

@raoulduuke

Ай бұрын

he meant jamie has a contender, bobby being the contender against jamie for moty. but yeah it didn't sound right

@JBurford

Ай бұрын

Self induced oddity detected

@papleylivesrentfreeinurhead

Ай бұрын

@@InnocentComeng hes just having a laugh in this episode it feels

Watching Jamie Elliot kick goal of the year 😂 didn't know he was even playing that day

I love the unbiased comments towards your own team, keep up the great work!

Somehow the AFL’s response to the 50m penalty was stupider than the decision itself.

@Tobysfishingandtravelling

Ай бұрын

Exactly, it’s ridiculous

I actually said to a bloke before I saw this video - if Bobby Hill landed that hanger on his back - stand out Mark Of The Year, but classy enough to land on his feet.

The thing with the North Melbourne 50 metre call is players can't assume it's play on. They are taught from juniors to play the whistle and did not listen clear as day 50m

@captainpoppleton

Ай бұрын

I think they both assumed it was not a 15m kick. On that subject, the number of very short kicks that are paid as 15m is crazy.

@Cash_Welch

Ай бұрын

@@captainpoppleton It doesn't matter you play the whistle and the whistle was blown and 2 of them over ran the mark it's still 50m

@chadchadderton

Ай бұрын

I get what you mean but the whistle for the mark came quite late so by that reasoning they were playing to the whistle assuming it's play on... unless you aren't aware that there is no whistle for play on.

@Cash_Welch

Ай бұрын

@@chadchadderton I know the rule however the umpire would be calling play on which he never did either…

He should had the one in the north Melbourne game when jiath ran off the field and got told he pushed the north player when he did not even touch the player at all

Dunno how I will live without these videos after September

What about daicos getting tackled with out the ball just before the "50" that everyone is sooking over

@chrisdryden1400

Ай бұрын

And the “throw” was a clear handball from the reverse angle

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

@@chrisdryden1400 quanor,a wasn't though. A clear throw

You said Bobby Hill was Jamie Elliot my man!!

Im loving the new style with extra commentary, keep it up!

Yeah, like it.. good research. Commentary and delivery of topics a plus for me. Well done.

Love this style, more like this. Big fan

Love the extra adds a lot to the video, plus not going to complain no about you making them a bit longer

4:54 said this while watching the game. its just a safehaven in ya d50 or if theres limited options. also feel like the holding the ball changes have seemingly stopped over the last few round compared to when the changes were debuted.

10:10 is Hunter Clark not mitch!

imho the fact that the kangaroos even scored 9 goals, let alone were up by 9 goals is an oddity in of itself

great energy in this video! keep it up 😊

watching the wizard is funny because hes a great player for us and gets into so many good positions but he just can’t execute his kick😭😭

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

They keep saying how good he was as a junior kicking goals, why not now?

@Matar_AFL

Ай бұрын

@@holdingthebull probably the pressure, hes getting hated by everyone. hes a really good player, just needs to get his set shot kicking right

@papleylivesrentfreeinurhead

Ай бұрын

@@holdingthebull needs the senior time but its hard when the hawks are going so well, cant have a liability in the forward line with this momentum

@n018b5

Ай бұрын

I still think him ducking into tackles for frees is just a dodgey way to play the game.

@Matar_AFL

Ай бұрын

@@n018b5 yeah but you also gotta remember hes 170 cm

You could do an hour long video on weird calls in crows games. Or just on holding the ball.. Good vids. Keep it up

There was a moment in the Lions Saints game, where Darcy Willmony gather the ball from a tap down, and got sandwiched by two saints as he tried to run, resulting in all 3 going down. The umpire called it 'in the back' but AGAINST Willmont. Somehow the player in possession pushed a saints player in the back? The only explanation i can think of is the umpire meant to call 'holding' and just misspoke.

I'm surprised you didn't include the Daicos falcon assist. I don't recall ever seeing one quite like it, especially as it eventually lead to a goal.

So what has 2024 taught us frens? More Umpires = worse umpiring. Good work HTB, cheers!

"oh if the umpire" "oh if this call" I mean at the end of the day missed calls are part of football and they go both ways and some days you get unlucky. It's happened to every team and it's easier to make a call in hindsight.

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

What hindsight?

I enjoy this style of video as well as the older style. Do what makes you happy.

Great vid content and length

taylor adams was such a mature player, i've noticed the change in him for multiple games this year. guess it's the sydney environment

Would be keen to see you do a point of the year comp at the end of the year. I know there’s been a couple so far.

I know I’ve commented already about the north Collingwood incident, no matter what people think it definitely can’t be changed now and from what has happened this year with umpire calls are we really surprised that calls were missed

Love these videos every week. Very unbiased aswell even after stating you are a crows fan

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

I try to be. Some crows bias is no doubt going to come through but I try to be impartial

Great work mate 👍

I think you should do whatever you want re: commentary. I personally like hearing your thoughts and opinions on the oddities youre sharing

Yes, improved format. Love it. 👍🏻

Elliot still has the best mark. Went up on the dudes shoulders. Glad you included the Q foul. It was so obvious and in the open, don’t know how they misuse it. Then there was the goal that was tipped but they didn’t review it.

Agree with other comments here, Scott tried to draw the 50 tbh. I've seen some arguments say he was sprinting and had to come to a stop and momentum and all that, which is a load of shit. The bloke dumps it inside 50 about 1.30 left to go in the game and stays on the wing until he gets it back, so you can assume he was doing a light jog at best. Umpire was shit for taking too long to call anything, Scott dumb for running the few extra steps. Not Sidebottom/Beau. None of this would be talked about either if Scotts shit kick back into the 50 was a mark.

@thebob3712

Ай бұрын

you try running and then come to a complete stop. I'm a Roos fan and even if that was a 50, not paying it was not the reason why they lost

@shanaggy

Ай бұрын

@@thebob3712 mate he was barely running, he was obviously on the wing the whole time to dump it back in if that was the case, which is what happened. Didn't say that's why they lost either, North had a really good game. When they can string together 4 quarters they will be tough to beat.

@thebob3712

Ай бұрын

@@shanaggy #1 he was running, how fast doesnt matter # 2 I didnt say that you said that was the reason why they lost but you do you and comprehend what you read to suit your narrative🤡

@sarabaker6286

Ай бұрын

100% he planned to play on and then played for a 50 when he realised he would be tackled.....I'm guessing steel and mccreery didn't hear the first whistle because they stopped dead at the second waiting for the call and then in the confusion before they even stood on the mark Scott played on

The Collingwood push in the marking contest was horrendous

I prefer this style with more talking, helpful context for those of us who don't watch every match

subscribed as soon as i heard you were a crows fan

10:07, hunter clark is not Mitch Owens

Think we have seen shank of the year courtesy of no 35 at freo. Nick watson is a shank machine.

hook turn. must be from melbourne. love this 😂

I think landing on your feet makes a mark better! And I disagree about the 50 at the end of the game - the NM player with the mark clearly started to play on and stepped off the line, then changed his mind.

@Ryzi03

Ай бұрын

I'm with you on half of that. Sticking the landing 100% makes the mark better. If you've got the control and skill to not only run, jump and mark but to also stick the landing on the way down, that's miles better than only having the control to do the run, jump and mark part. I'm biased as a North supporter but it doesn't matter whether he started to play on or not, the umpire never called play on so you can't just run over the mark because you believe it to be play on. Might as well not have umpires at all if we're going to let the players decide when it's play on or not. The reasoning that the AFL gave that it's not 50 because the umpire didn't call 'stand' to indicate the mark is complete bullshit as well. If that's the case, what's stopping anyone else from crossing the mark before the umpire calls them to stand. No amount of shit umpiring can excuse us dropping a 9 goal lead though, we just don't have the legs for a full 4 quarters of hard effort at the moment

The media and people eating it up as an 'umpire call that cost north' is tiring, absolutely no one in their forward 50 takes a mark, immediately continues to take 4-5 steps off their mark, gives up when they see 2 defenders approaching and expects to be rewarded a free by pointing out the mark they just left, so why would it be any different on the wing or anywhere else on the field? He was JOGGING when he took the mark and had clear intention of playing on (BECAUSE HE DID) and even played on once he realized the umpire completely distracted the two pies after him. None of them thought it was a mark, THEY ALL went to play on and by the time they stopped for the whistle that's what it was, you don't get to revoke your choice to play-on and get rewarded for it because you stopped for a call that lost its effect the moment you kept on running with the ball? Play-on everyday of the week regardless of who you support and it's hard to believe this is even an argument considering how many other free kicks that were legitimately free kicks got missed and no one talks about it because the underdog lost.

8:36 Wasnt this the play where Daics bicycle kicked it whilst held at half-back and it still ricocheted to a teammate to set up play? Or was that a different play? Regardless surprised you didn't mention that bit.

@HorizonOfHope

Ай бұрын

Yeah, Shiels was tagging him and holding him at the time. He socked into Shiels’ face and then ran off to do the rest of the play.

@sarabaker6286

Ай бұрын

​@HorizonOfHope but he's umpired differently just remember that 😂

Like the vid and the style

I get that there were so many things happening in that collingwood v north game, but no one is talking about how accurate North was. They kicked 19 goals 4.

Agreed on the boundary line safety net when caught HTB - terrible rule

While North got fucked by the umpires on the weekend, ultimately they gave up a 54 point lead in the second half. Can only blame themselves.

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

Absolutely.... maybe a goal or two from the umps but ultimately you can't give up a 54 point lead and blame it all on the umpires.

@prod.2733

Ай бұрын

@@holdingthebull umps rewarded north with a goal or two throughout the game lol

@jimmyohara2601

Ай бұрын

In the very fist instance, - do NOT give up a 54 points LEAD. Bloody hell, jesus gee Zeus 😮😲🤪

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

​@@prod.2733did you forget the touched goal that was awarded to the collispuds

8:54 when Bailey Dale was doing a kick in, he rain just his full range of step

2:02 whoops! mark and bobby hill, I think you mean

a pity you didnt talk about xerri dive over the fence, xerri is about 1000kgs and tj looks like he can be pushed over by the wind at marvel stadium.

@cruzerggs

Ай бұрын

Absolutely agree, as well as the ball going 5m out of bounds in the 2nd quarter

You missed toby Greene's first goal that they called a behind

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

Oh I didn't see that one

@4:55 in regards to HTB around the boundary line sometimes its HTB and sometimes its not it depends on which umpire blows the whistle first. In this case no doubt that HTB should of been called here

like the extra commentary!

Adams wasn't even looking at Hinge and got taken out. Thought he was indicating to Amartey

Bro put an odditie in and odditie saying Jamie Elliot lol

7:44 when trealor had the ball and kicked a goal, he said” it’s a pretty sh*t kick” but idc 😂

1:55 you’ve gotta be pulling my leg🤔 Jamie elliot? Goal of the year? It was a speccy, which was taken by bobby hill!😂😂 ain’t no way

Mcleary got bloody bench press 😂

The reason the ball went all the way back is bcos the handball was considered a throw & I believe rightly. The 2 players encroaching on the marked kick off the ground was definitely 50 metres. Appallingly poor decision making by the umpires. I agree that the running over the boundary to avoid being caught should be an automatic deliberate out of bounds.

The north player was about to play it on, why would that be 50?

@bmanbb

Ай бұрын

It's explained in the video, you have to stand on the mark. No play on was called before they ran over the mark.

@rerooar

Ай бұрын

He took 2 or 3 steps more than he needed, i recon he was trying to draw the defenders and milk a 50, %100 played on.

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

In my opinion they both overran the mark before any play on happened and the umpire didn't call play on, therefore, should have been 50m

@therealjonesy5525

Ай бұрын

@@bmanbbthe afl came out and said it should of been a play on call before the 50 call had to be made

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

About to play on🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

all good....short is good...good commentary

Last touch out of bounds on the full. This needs to change

I thought the Xerri free and goal after the non push from Jiath would be worth mentioning. Looked like he staged for it, definitely not enough force from Jiath to warrant that action.

@aaronthegamerguy7696

Ай бұрын

Nope everyone seems to forget that and there were plenty of other frees not paid for either side in that game to me everyone can't handle the fact the Collingwood pulled off a great comeback I think North Melbourne celebrated a little too early with a half to still go so I think north has nobody but themselves to blame for giving up a 54 point lead but that's just my opinion and everyone is entitled to their own

@thebob3712

Ай бұрын

he pushed him while he was over the line, no need to touch a player when they are not on the field of play, and you think no players "stage" for frees? that's funny

@aaronthegamerguy7696

Ай бұрын

@@thebob3712 I would hardly call it a push he clearly played for that free and got it

@thebob3712

Ай бұрын

@@aaronthegamerguy7696 read my last sentence of my comment, whats the difference between what X done and someone shrugging their shoulders to get a high tackle? and also read the bit where I wrote don't touch players when they are over the line, It's easy to understand, for some people.

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

​@aaronthegamerguy7696 what did you think of the goal that Collingwood got awarded that was touched?

On the non-50m penalty at the end of North/C'wood: in a sane world, play-on, but the league has for years imposed 50-metre disease on the umpires - do they get a bonus $ per 50 paid, or what? - so in the context of a League blighted with 50-m penalties, it should have been another one imposed.

‘the umpires can’t see that stuff in the moment’ except when they’re two of the most obvious decisions you could ever make. i’m sick of this argument excusing the hopelessness of the umpires when the whole point of their job is to make the correct calls in crucial moments like this

No one mentioning daicos clearly being tackled when he kicks it off the ground “should’ve been 50 two players overran the mark” how about daicos being tackled without the ball

I’m a Collingwood supporter but I think that definitely a 50 meter

50m pentaly shouldnt have even been a mark, Its a free kick to Daicos. Soccered the ball off the ground, never had possession and was taken to ground without having the ball.

@sarabaker6286

Ай бұрын

Thank you at least someone here said it, roos player pulled him back by the scruff of his jumper and it wasn't the first time it happened during the game either

@stevelozevski8151

Ай бұрын

@@sarabaker6286 half a minute before that quaynor threw the ball but maybe that doesn't fit your narrative. Needed to cheat to beat the worst team in the competition. Joke of a team

That Quaynor one at 11.40 is terrible stuff

Yes, North should not have blown a 54 point lead. Also though, North were slaughtered by the umps. And when you are a bottom side trying to beat Collingwood AND the umpires it is freaking hard. The Qaynor throw, the Daicos throw and the non-50 metre penalty were all terrible calls that should have led to shots on goal for North. As well as Collingwood being given a goal that was touched and should have been over-turned. As well as a pretty harsh 50 metre penalty resulting in a goal to Collingwood when Powell took 3 seconds or so to give the ball back to the Collingwood player. End free kick count was 24-14. It was uneven to say the least. I think the North lads deserved better, but I am not salty because it was the best footy North have played in about 3 seasons, and when the younger kids have a bigger tank we will not get over run so easily. The green shoots are finally starting to sprout. Go Roos!

Collingwood have got to be paying millions to the umpires

I loved the McCreary dump bcos he's done it often himself. Couldn't happen to a more deserving player.

You said that shezel tackles jaith but that’s not jaith

3:12, Tell me how its not a Daicos free for holding the man, He never took possession and was taken to ground.

keep them like this xx

3:14 i think it would have been 50 if the Umpire said "Stand" or something like that, also he did go off the Mark when walking back so that is play on. thats just my opinion tho im not Responding to any Replies

tbf in the 3rd pies kicked 4 goals in a row directly from frees

@shatogirl

Ай бұрын

and the steps laura kane says the north player took are the same as any other player who marks after running at full speed.. to slow urself down

@sarabaker6286

Ай бұрын

​@shatogirl she's talking about the steps he took after he stopped running, he was going to play on, changed his mind when the pies players ran towards him (pretty sure they didn't hear the whistle the crowd getting pretty loud might need a fog horn) by then the umpire had already decided to call play on....

@shatogirl

Ай бұрын

@@sarabaker6286 yeah because the whistle has been blown and they still hadn’t been told to stand so he probably thought they were gonna tackle him. it’s a joke

@sarabaker6286

Ай бұрын

@@shatogirl the error was in the umpires lack of communication not the fact that a 50 wasn't paid, but all that aside in the confusion Scott played on with full unfetted access and couldn't convert, 3 more shots on goal after that and neither one was converted......on a side note that "mark" was after Nick Daicos was pulled away from the ball by the scruff of his jumper and should have been a free for holding but we won't talk about that will we? No because it doesn't fit the narrative that north was robbed or that Daicos is umpired differently (was held earlier in the game too and soccer kicked the ball into his opponents head)

@shatogirl

Ай бұрын

@@sarabaker6286 dont know why im wasting my time on a clear pies supporter who cant see how clearly shit and bias the umpiring is towards her own team. good try tho thankd

Thanks, a Yank... This week mark vs Elliot on ANZAC

at least franga can be a step ladder for jamie elliots goal of the year

Nah the landing makes it even more impressive for mine. Hill's just carried on about his day like the MOTY jdidn't just happen, that's as close as you can get in the AFL world to "cool guys don't look at explosions".

You can go back they do it if the ball is touched, they will take the ball back for a kick in, and in this game I think 1 qtr Harry sheezle pinned #no 19 and 20 seconds later he gets his free kick, and there is also a third umpire mate.

You make great vids, longer the better. %100 disagree about the north 50, he took the mark jogging and then took 5 steps, at least 3 of those steps weren't necessary. I think he was trying to draw the defenders toward him to try and milk a 50, %100 played on. Also (not wanting to disagree with you too much ...but) with everyone complaining about bad umpiring, surly if the further away umpire gets the call right then that's a good thing, no? Again awesome content, I only watch 1 game a week if I'm lucky so i miss all this stuff, cheers.

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

That's all good mate, you can disagree with me. That's no issue at all. I guess that's why everyone has differing opinions on if that should have been a 50m penalty. I agree that it should have been a mark and Larkey knocked it out late, sometimes that's play on, sometimes its a mark and sometimes its a 50m penalty.... so who knows!

ole mate called Ian Hill Jamie Elliot.

I like this style 👍

@holdingthebull

Ай бұрын

Appreciate it mate

Silly holding the bull it’s Bobbie hill

That’s not 50 meters, he played on😂

Crows got some really stiff umpiring that definitely shifted the momentum in Sydney's favour. Also Adams is a flop

could not fucking agree more with both of your crows swans gripes- the 50 absolutely needs to be paid and is a disgrace to stop play and florent come back, and using out of bounds as a "oh all I need to do is get out of play and im safe" is infuriating

When north was at the end of the game nick dacos throw it and where’s the 50

I'm a Swans fan through & through & have hated the Bulldogs since Tony Liberatore used to grab players by the balls but the Bont is the best player in the competition.

1:57 Jamie Elliot???

It's Bobby Hill not Jamie Elliott with the mark of the year

If a player feints a handball to try and milk a 50 like keays did then the umpire is required not to pay it. That's been the case since the stand rule was introduced, perfectly umpired in this instance actually.

We are the Collingwood umpires

That’s Bobby hill

bobby hill took the mark not jamie elliot 😂

Enjoy the new format.🤗