Good riddance to the person that stole those packages! Can’t wait to see what they use it for 😂

@beng6044

Жыл бұрын

Thank you Simone and Cleo for being awesome role models for girls everywhere. You are both amazingly talented and intelligent women!

@antonkristensen6665

Жыл бұрын

Hey from the "misshapen metal bits" comment it sounds like it was your grid that was stolen? I built a fusor as my bachelor thesis at uni, and it was actually really easy to make prototype grids by hand with just stainless steel thread. Also from my experience you might benefit from more "spokes" on your grid.

@floydbarber7528

Жыл бұрын

probably change the world by making a fusion that works and gives more energy

@booneadkins

Жыл бұрын

Evil Iron Man suit?

@TheMemesofDestruction

Жыл бұрын

Good thing that stuffs totally not trackable.

As a nuclear engineer, I’m in AWE that you got the CEO of Helion on here! That’s so cool, id love to work for helion I’m so happy you met him

@hikolanikola8775

5 ай бұрын

well if you were that sexy im sure he would meet you too haha... :(

At 8:00 you refer to plasma as the disassociation of neutrons, protons, and electrons; however, (in this context) plasma is when the electrons are stripped from the nucleus (ionized) while the protons and neutrons remain bound to each other. I really enjoy your videos.

@siggiTHEsiegmund

Жыл бұрын

really enjoy watching the video! But this needs to be corrected or annotated.

@CleoAbram

Жыл бұрын

Hey, thanks! I've added a correction here, and it should appear as a little info card in the video there: "07:48 In plasma, one or more electrons are torn free from an atom (as opposed to protons and neutrons themselves being "broken into bits"!)"

@CraftyF0X

Жыл бұрын

There were other tiny errors too but there is no need for me to be pedantic it was a goood introduction for anyone not too familiar.

@MikkoRantalainen

Жыл бұрын

@@CleoAbram There's something wrong with that info card. All I can see is little "ⓘ" symbol on top left but it only says "(null)" when I try to interact with it.

@clementpecheux1586

Жыл бұрын

Also at 7:48, when you say that you don't find plasma in a kitchen it made me ask my self if flames or neon lights are plasma. If it is the case then you might have plasma in your kitchen 😉

It's been so much fun watching and seeing some skills that you obviously developed at Vox, but now also storytelling and style and voice that is definitely uniquely yours. Loving the quality of this content and watching it evolve with every new episode!

@MrOwen27

Жыл бұрын

Don't like breaking the fourth wall, it was fine when som people where doing that, now everyone doing this, and it's enjoying, ruins storytelling.

@zach4505

Жыл бұрын

Reminds me of organizational structure of guilds. Cleo, in my eyes, has gone through an Apprenticeship, Journeyman, and is Master of the video journalism craft. I feel she can have a successful lifelong career with this. Especially if she can bottle her success and market it to others in her trade of video journalism. Beautiful work Cleo, Ill be sharing your work with my students.

@Birdyflys-tt9gm

9 ай бұрын

Best part is, it’s not political

Awesome working with you on this one - we can’t wait to see the fusor built in Part 2!

@trevorsmith779

Жыл бұрын

is the fusor going to be implementing a FRC configuration?

@pieterpretorius1014

Жыл бұрын

i wonder if its possible to control a farnsworth fusor with an arduino? and what kind of sensors it would need for the whole contraption to actually sustain itself? i've looked into these little fusors for quite the while but never had the guts or the money to build one

@peterw3474

Жыл бұрын

You guys rock, so many clever people coming at this problem from so many different angles I'm sure something will stick :)

@LeCharles07

Жыл бұрын

Why is it pink?

@joesmith-nr6tc

9 ай бұрын

Great video Cleo! Thank you! Hello @HelionEnergy! Amazing tech. Godspeed! I'm curious what your take is on "climate change"? I suspect your probably "all-in" for obvious reasons. I ask bc despite it's near ubiquity these days, there appears to be a number of fundamental problems with the theory - esp. regarding carbon dioxide. The true answers to a few questions provide what anyone interested should know about CO2/Earth climate; what was the maximum CO2 level in the past? What is the "ideal" CO2 level for plants? What is the minimum CO2 level for plants? The current CO2 level in relation to the "true answers" to those questions tells everything one needs to know about what "the consensus" believes causes climate change. I encourage anyone interested to repeat the process. It's well worth it. Very enlightening! PS, I say "true answers to a few questions" bc the BS is everywhere! From all sides of the debate. The politics attached to this issue are pathetic and sad.

Cleo has said that one of the goals of her channel is to give people informed reasons for hope and optimism. Watching her learn how to say “nuclear proliferation” made me feel like anyone can do anything. (Also, Simone is the best, can’t wait for the build.)

I'm the first to comment on how fantastic Cleo's vids are becoming. I really appreciate your hard work and dedication.

@CleoAbram

Жыл бұрын

thank you!! I really appreciate it. I love making them, and there's so much more we can do.

@dhruvdijudeyanandan8808

Жыл бұрын

Very informative, definitely subscribing

Hey, I’m a PhD student at the uk’s national lab for fusion. Just wanted to say that this is a really good introductory video to fusion and explains very difficult concepts well in a short space of time

I just came across your channel about a week ago and WOW your videos are genuinely so amazing. The pacing, the storytelling, the editing, everything. It feels somehow both incredibly professional and conversational at the same time. Can't wait to see where you take this channel!

This is so great! I really enjoyed watching two of the biggest nerds I follow online geek out together ☺️

Shame on the KZread algorithm for taking until today to let me know Cleo had her own channel! Great video, informative, entertaining, and flows nicely through the facets of the topic. I'm looking forward to digging into the rest of them!

The editing flow you have, where you jump out of the frame to the editor and explain things - I really really like it. You always seem to manage to do it at times to explain the stuff that I'm thinking. Also it is great to see some underlying themes from the channel show through on different videos. You mentioned about the possibilities of having unlimited energy back in your clean energy video and the idea of reducing being mis-stated. I'm really looking forward to seeing the video in another 6 months and where things might lead.

Obviously the video was good, the way you tell story, all the editing and the play with camera that's all amazing. The topic was little blurred but I guess waiting for part 2 will be worth it.

As someone who has been working in this field for some time now, its nice to see one of the creators I follow doing a video about it! Fusion is hard but the recent batch of experimental results gives me hope.

Ok, now I can't wait to see part 2, I loved this video, your organization of the parts and editing. The subject is very interesting and I hope you are having a lot of fun with the building with Simone. You two are awesome

Congrats on the explanation, I loved this 101 on fusion. Thank you! Some of the issues that fusion systems are experiencing are how to overcome the great complexity of engineering challenges required to maintain a running fusion system. The systems being developed now only last for a very small blip of a second. I believe the more experiments we can do on a smaller scale (just as you did) the greater the ingenuity we can throw at the engineering difficulties of constructing a running fusion system and the faster we can achieve a sustainable outcome. Build small fusion kits in many Labs and Unis. Start playing with our ingenuity in problem-solving and experimenting faster. Unleash our most powerful weapon; a network of minds. Something we need to remember is that having the culture to play with ideas and methods is just as powerful in problem-solving as building a massive methodical laboratory process.

I love your way of storytelling, Cleo. Keep on doing what you do

Hi Cleo I work for an R&D center in Mexico. I'm really impressed for your communication ability to describe Physics fundamentals with ease. Many thanks! I'm your fan now.

More collabs like these with Simone please. This was awesome. Two of you are really great at what you do.

You should look into deep geothermal. It holds 90% as much promise for cheap electricity, but it's relatively simple tech and only a couple of years away. It doesn't get enough press, I don't know why.

@Canucklug

Жыл бұрын

The potential answer to deep geothermal is ironically a fusion technology that uses the super powered microwave system used for heating plasma to drill in the deep layers. Large scale test in 2024 by Quaise Energy!

Great video as always. Especially love the editing style - the inclusion of the actual premiere files as a transition is a cool additional. Goes a long way to show the transparency and authenticity you show through the wider process.

Love the video, kinda wish you had mentioned ITER as this is the experiment that will tell us if tokamak reactors can work at scale as a power plant. Maybe your friendly ceo asked you not to as that's a competing technology. Perfectly understandable if so! Loved to see that stellerator picture too!

The quality of your videos gets better and better everytime! I'm loving it! The writing, the editing, the animations, you're killing it!

It's crazy that the main caveat of not getting more energy out than we put in has already been solved just two months after this video was posted

@RedaKadem

Жыл бұрын

By who?

@magicvibrations5180

Жыл бұрын

@@RedaKadem The US department of energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

@shirshajitsingha7567

Жыл бұрын

@@magicvibrations5180 well, it's still tentative. For actual practical use, it still needs to be about a 100 times more efficient and we need to be able to reproduce it at a much faster rate, but we're getting there!

@ct1762

Жыл бұрын

@@shirshajitsingha7567 not even close. 300 units in, 3 out. sounds like a giant gulf to me.

@helgefan8994

Жыл бұрын

@@magicvibrations5180 Magnetic confinement reactors (tokamaks and stellarators) are much closer to commercial power generation though. The DEMO reactor planned to be built after ITER will most likely already be able to actually put power into the grid.

I've just discovered your channel, it's fantastic! Thank you, the world needs more creators like you. :)

You guys are so awesome!!! I originally wrote a long drawn out explanation of the many ways you did that, but after reading YOUR AWSOME sums it. Please keep up the great work and I look forward to seeing more great things from you two in the future

The colab we all wanted but don't deserve

@chrislanejones

Жыл бұрын

KZread colabs are the best... I only binge watch KZread.

Great channel and content. Looking forward to part 2.

Small correction, in a plasma the neutrons and protons don't separate. It's just the electrons that stop orbiting the nucleus

You have some great ideas that I love seeing, and the talents and skills to tell a compelling story. I really appreciate you even showing your mistakes in a funny way. I can't wait to see part two!

Great video! But don't do clickbait like that... By that standard I also tried to build a fusion reactor in my kitchen. I just happened to have five extra packages missing.

I really love how cleo goes entirely against the masses here saying "hey, the problem is not using too much energy, it is having too little". It's something I have believed in for a long time, and I am not alone with this.

@morkovija

Жыл бұрын

kardashev scale my man, the one true measurement stick for civilization ;)

@snizami

Жыл бұрын

It's magical thinking though. The lack of time and resources we have makes it so that we can't just innovate and consume our way out. Fusion is actually a good example of something that's theoretically possible but may very well not be applicable or scalable to help much. It's why believers have to rely on erroneous fluffy notions like, 'we did other electricity stuff before.'

@christianschmitt2409

Жыл бұрын

@@snizami I'm with you on Fusion not being a thing. It's often hard for me to understand cleo's optimism, but she geht's some fore Points right.

@snizami

Жыл бұрын

@@christianschmitt2409 it's just a very troublesome kind of optimism to have when facing such a crisis. The 'Don't Look Up' kind. I think the video that started it all is an even better example. Recall the example of adding insulation vs having abundant energy such that we won't even need to insulate. Insulation is a known, practical, lasting solution that effectively acts at least as well as adding extra energy to the equation. Why! Why undermine realistic and urgent mitigating requirements with mirage like hopes of abundant energy just over the horizon? The polished graphics presented by a skillful and seemingly well meaning person makes it all the more worrying.

@christianschmitt2409

Жыл бұрын

@@snizami that's a good point. Not adding insulation would be rather stupid. however, having abundant energy doesn't have to stop us from doing that. Energy will still not be free. and I totally see optimism being dangerous in this time. at any time, really.

I’m a high school STEM teacher. My chem class is doing nuclear chemistry right now, so I’m showing this to them. I may show it to my engineering class as well. I wish I could easily coordinate it with my algebra and geometry classes, but I’ll see most of them in chem. P.s. Whenever I face similar mispronunciation proliferations, I either switch to easier-to-say and/or smaller words: weaponization, militarization or arming all work pretty well. Complete ideas like “runaway military repurposing,” “exponential arms propagation,” and “uncontrolled weapons development,” all express proliferation people better than the obscure word itself (to most people).

I really had the felling that with this video I am not a step ahead but a step backwards it doesn't bring me nothing new but maybe it's good for a younger audience... but Simone is great! She explains well and she built a chair for dogs that always want to sit next to us!? Fantastic! That's really cool I subscribed her channel!! Thank you Simone! 🙂🙂

Truly inspiring and intuitively conveying information. It's also amazing seeing the video quality and Polishness (no idea if that's a word) ramping up over the past year.

Ladies, you are just amazing and your contents are addictively well made!!!!!!!

Well this is my first time coming across this channel so congratulations to the algorithm, I’m in, I’m hooked, what’s next!!!!

This channel is fantastic! I wish I had heard of it before! Thanks Simone for bringing me here, I always go to KZread to laugh at something, but you two are making me smarter by all means 😂😂😂

Why not wait until another 2 weeks to make the video?

I’m 100% behind continuing to research fusion reactors. Just not at the cost of slowing down our deployment of other tech like solar and wind. Like you said in the video, it feels like fusion has “almost been a thing” for a long time. There’s just too much risk that we never really manage to get it to work so we shouldn’t put all our eggs in that basket.

There's often some cynicism when people build "garage fusors", maybe in part because it's often linked to slightly overhyped articles about "genius teens". However -- too many people think that the goal of hobby engineering projects is to end up with an original invention, or a functional product. The important bit is the knowledge, the skills, the insights gained along the way! Projects like these inspire people to learn more about physics, visit makerspaces, work on their own projects, or even convince kids to get STEM degrees, which is a major win!

I absolutely LOVE that ad timer in the upper left that tells us what you're saying is an ad. Wish everyone did that on KZread... much respect for you.

The quantity of videos are just 📈📈📈

ITER is a test reactor in France which may show that it can produce more energy than it consumes in fusion. You could add that in Part 2. Although we are at the beginning of a long journey, there are already reactors that can produce a Plasma. 😁

This is the first time I come across your channel. I just want to say that I really enjoy your channel and unique creative and narrative style. It's also great to see women sharing their passion for science :) Thank you, I learned a lot.

Just look up the Farnsworth Fusor. And yes, the Farnsworth name was given to the professor in Futurama. :) I made one with some PVC pipes, a small vacuum pump, and a 10kv sign transformer. It only made plasma, but it was working. You could use a Bell jar if you want. If you do start to fuse material, be careful, they can spit out x-rays.

Dont try this at home!

@aadpiraat7126

Ай бұрын

Buuut moooom

These are such amazing videos!! Thank you for all of the work you out into them

Not gonna lie - as a physicist, whenever journalists try to talk about physics it usually makes me cringe pretty hard . But this video was actually really competent and got almost everything right, well done!

We don’t need to recreate a fusion reactor when the sun is literally the biggest fusion reactor in space. We just need solar and storage 😂

@psycronizer

Жыл бұрын

yep, they are idiots...

Your edit style is so fricking satisfying. And cool to see you and Simone collab! Subscribed!

Woahhh that was inspiring! Amazing work Cleo, can't wait to see what you and Simone make

Really love your channel and the fascinating and uplifting content you bring. Thank you.

I love the organization and integration of the editing timeline into the video to help navigate the narrative

I can't help but to think the CEO looked alot like Dr Octopus, just younger... and they both loved the idea of sun on earth

As a physics researcher in Caltech, Plasma isn't a cloud of subatomic particles like protons and neutrons, its just a gas of mostly charged cations and electrons

Simone is one of the most delightful people on the Internet. But honestly, if I ever ran into her walking around LA, I think I'd be even more excited about meeting Scraps.

The choice to show the editing software, and zip in and out of the frames was brilliant. Gives an interesting connection to the video.

I'm an engineer for UW Madison Plasma Physics where we're currently building WHAM, an axisymmetric mirror using next generation high-temperature superconducting magnets. We're a much smaller team than HELION, ITER, etc., but we will still be making groundbreaking discoveries in the next couple years. We hope to make first plasmas by summer 2023! Reach out if you want to learn more; we don't have the publicity of these larger experiments, but you can find out more be searching for 'Wisconsin HTS Axisymmetric Mirror'.

Jeeez you do some really cool stuff with this channel Cleo, tbh it's really motivating to push myself in my own way to do something cool

Sublimation skips a phase change when you add more energy . Love seeing new people get involved, and build something cool .

This is such a clear, well explained video. I feel like I understand so much more about the topic than before and feel way more excited about the future of fusion!

I love your communication style which fits so nicely with Simone as well. Great video and I’m looking forward to Part 2.

13:32 - That's a very good point and I am glad your friend mentioned it.

Love the topic you choose, it is reaaly unique how you try to find the topics that is important and futuristic! Keep going! ♥️

I just found your channel and I have to say, brilliant explanation with so crisp editing, looking forward to see more from you!

Wow! The production value and creativity of the edit are leading. Congrats and you've got me hooked for part 2.

Can't wait to see you and Simone build an Electric Field confinement Fusion Reactor! Because that's the only easy way to do Fusion, where you just make a very strong spherical electric field, and all the charged particles oscillate back and forth between the walls and collide with each other in the center. It just takes _WAY_ more energy to run it compared to the output, but it's a very good neutron source! (be careful with the radiation please) (I just started with my Master's in "Science & Technology of Nuclear Fusion" :) )

About 15 years, I was thinking about building one. It was large amount of power (that will definitely kill you) that made me think twice about it.

One of my favorite channels. This channel delivers information in a fun way to receive it.

I am more excited about what MIT is trying to do with geothermal energy than Fusion. Geothermal energy is a well proven technology. MIT is just working on the technology to be able to drill deeper than we currently can. That will allow us to utilize geothermal energy anywhere on earth. On top of that they say it can be used on existing coal and natural gas power plants to generate endless clean energy

Fusion is fascinating. Especially to those here. A very early idea I had was to put D&T in a hollow sphere and charge the sphere positive. Nuclei don't repel to the center as I may want because the cross section area of a samplng cone increases with the square of the distance while repulsion decreases with its square simultaniously so there is no preference for the center. After years I changed the goal. The new goal is to balance away the the nuclear repulsion separating the D&T nuclei Maybe a foam metallic glass sphere having very small precisely spherical hollows is the answer. The hollows may be defined by lithium microspheres. Spray the grounded sphere with Positively charged ions of interest. Aloha

This is a wonderful insight into the current atmosphere of chemistry and physics research!

With that title you should know people are expecting to actually see something built.

Not trying to be a party pooper or anything, but this is all over the place. It's like a dream. Airplane, banana, elephant, green box, shake the camera and then switch the music again and someone says something random. Just stay on topic and don't try too hard with the effects.

Actual title: We TALK about building a nuclear fusion reactor.

Here we go : proliferation /prəlɪfəˈreɪʃn/

Also Fusion combines atoms (as in FUSE atoms together), and fission divides atoms (like a fissure), easiest way to remember the difference, one fuses, one creates a fissure.

simone and you are two rays of light, creating the best places of youtube.

I hope the package thief is struck by plasma "rays" I look forward to the jokes at the footer of your descriptions now

This video is so great! Thank you for talking about fusion and making it understandable for everyday people.

Love your videos, Cleo. Keep up the good work!

Your videos are always so much fun to watch!!

The ceo looks like Dr.Octavius who was also trying to do nuclear fusion !! 🤯

While i still totally hate the fact, that it is a evil clickbait video... I actually like your approach, style and the resulting video format very much! The collaboration with Simone Giertz is a very cool cherry on top (and it looks like you don't just exploit her reach but actually add your fair share to it. ;)) You got yourself another subscriber ;)

Really great video and interesting topic, the duo works well ! And also great to see two really smart and talented women on KZread talking about important science topics, we need more of this. Keep the good work !

I have recently found your channel, and can't stop watching all the contents because they are so good...❤❤❤

Love watching stuff that I know nothing about... sort of gives the brain a wake up punch. Thank you. Subbed here.

Your excitement for science and progress is contagious. Keep making great videos 👌

In the 80's I heard that nuclear fusion was about 25 years away. I think that's still the case.

The proliferation issue is pretty complicated but that was a nice way to say why “controlled fusion” can’t be used to make a bomb. Fission has a tendency to produce smaller amounts of more energetic materials. This is because the freed subatomic particles need somewhere to go. A freed proton might join up with some heavy uranium. The product of hydrogen fusion is helium… a necessary element for chip manufacturing that is becoming scarce.

Wait, what? Why do you @Cleo Abram only have 243K subscribers.... I find your way in wich you are telling these video's fasinating... You are telling these stories in ways I have seen perhaps no other KZreadr tell these stories... or well, perhaps Mark Rober is an exception... But in a different kind of way. Even though I love Simone, I think you should have WAAAYYYYYYY more subscribers!

1st time visiting your channel. Your editing is so awesome you earned 1 more subscriber.

Plasma physics PhD student here! I LOVED THIS VIDEO! Thank you for shedding light on fusion research :) Good Luck!

It's only a matter of time until we are able to stabilize fusion plasma for extended amounts of time, but sadly the prejudice against fission sets back the development of fuision despite fusion actually holding this huge potential for (compareatively) clean, sustainable and effecient energy! Also in regards to space travel!

Recently, a group of people was able to gain energy from fusion (a small amount, but still progress!)

I watched a video about Helion’s fusion project a few weeks ago and now this project is like the icing on the cake! To watch two smart people do something they haven’t done before!

Genuine question that many haves and great explanation along the way. 10/10 ! Can't wait for part 2 !!

at 6:31 when the ceo talks about using fusion to perhaps add some more energy. That is an understatement. In thermonuclear bombs, fusion releases orders of magnitude more energy than the fission portion. The fission bomb serves the purpose to 'ignite' the uncontrolled fusion process - yes, it is that difficult. Fission bombs doesn't release enough energy to destroy the world,. The thermonuclear bombs, on the other hand, can alter geological feature - create large craters, take a chunk off of a mountain etc... If you look at the five permanent members of the UN security council: US, Russia, China, UK and France, they all have one thing in common - every country has thermonuclear weapons. btw, because the fusion process is so hard to initiate and maintain, the chance of nuclear meltdown event is much lower.

So great having you 2 in a video haha I loved that so much, what a treat!!! 2 of my favs!!! :D Aweosme video, this is great! So helpful and informative!!