when you're filming a fake filming of a real film about a real vampire that's fake but real in the fake film and you just can't get that damn lazy ass cat to play with the damn thing.

@HerEvilTwin

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@stopYmpersonatYngmYacCount Nosferatu (2024).

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

​@@HerEvilTwinNosferatu (2024).

Can we just appreciate the recreation of early 1920s expressionist-stylized costumes as well as the general early 1920s clothing? Beautiful.

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@ingenuousSoprano nosferatu (2024).

"WHY HIM, you monster,--why not...the Script girl!?" _(giggle)_ "The Script Girl.....I'll eat her later." 😈 7:35 LMAO I love that scene so much. The Shadow of the Vampire was such an underrated dark comedy.

@baileymoore7779

3 жыл бұрын

I thought it was a comedy too but on Wikipedia it is listed as just horror

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@SunBunz Nosferatu (2024).

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

​@@baileymoore7779Nosferatu (2024).

I would love to see a three-paneled comparison between similar scenes from F.W. Murnau's original "Nosferatu: Ein symphonie des grauens" (1922), Werner Herzog's remake "Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht / Nosferatu the Vampyre" (1979), and E. Elias Merhige's "Shadow of the Vampire" (2001).

@mr.someone52

2 жыл бұрын

Dont forget about Robert Eggers upcoming Film of Nosferatu.... It would be awesome if Dafoe would play him again

@troin3925

28 күн бұрын

@@mr.someone52 Dafoe is gonna be Van Helsing!

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@VanSisean Nosferatu (2024).

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

​@@mr.someone52Don't forget there are spoilers.

@VanSisean

10 күн бұрын

​​@@mr.someone52 Yes, a four-paneled comparison of those films would be even better once Eggers' adaptation is released.

Willem dafoe was just perfect. Excellent performance and excellent actor

@impmoviechannel3052

Жыл бұрын

He may be an excellent actor but "perfect"? Give me a break. 100 percent ham without subtly to no end.

@Afreshio

Жыл бұрын

@@impmoviechannel3052 that was the point of his perfomance

15 days from now Nosferatu will be 100 years old... 🎉

@VistaLivesIncAgain

8 ай бұрын

That's very old and died!

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@matthewweng8483 nosferatu (2024).

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

​@@VistaLivesIncAgainnosferatu (2024).

I remember watching this movie way back when and thinking 'Wow...Eddie Izzard is REALLY good at silent movie acting.' The recreations of the original moments from Nosferatu were so lovingly done.

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@jamesoblivion Nosferatu (2024).

There both good movies but nothing can beat the original.

@darko1295

4 жыл бұрын

Shadow of the Vampire isn't really meant to be a remake though so I don't think they could be compared

@LusciousTwinkle

4 жыл бұрын

You mean the book?

@alexthehooligan

3 жыл бұрын

Shadow of the Vampire isn’t a remake tho, it’s more of a behind the scenes, so that comparison doesn’t make sense

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

@cumberbatchambassador4270 Nosferatu (2024).

@cheloniadaycare8872

10 күн бұрын

​@@darko1295Nosferatu (2024).

Malkovich at the end was goddamn hilarious hahaha.

@user-nw3qf4xf2e

7 ай бұрын

Fun Fact : John Malkovich, who played F.W. Murnau in Shadow of the Vampire also played Lennie Small in the 1992 version of Of Mice and Men

Malkovich’s delivery is hilarious

@amslim27

4 жыл бұрын

Check out this life size Nosfetatu Vampire prop. kzread.info/dash/bejne/YpmezJerlpu8iKQ.html

@maxh9579

3 жыл бұрын

He's so pissed off in this movie lol

"SHE HAS A BEAUTIFUL BOSSOM!" 3:07

great movies both 👏

Nosferatu the masterpiece

Nice music. The original film looks like it was filmed mainly in broad daylight which proves Shreck wasn't a vampire.

@tylerwhit9023

6 жыл бұрын

canturgan the lightning was the way that it was because of the available technology at the time. Buts it’s implied that it was at night

@jordanhubbard940

5 жыл бұрын

Vampires aren't real which proves Schreck wasn't a vampire.

@ericanderson4801

5 жыл бұрын

It proves movie tech was in its infancy.

@tremorsfan

4 жыл бұрын

Originally silent movies would use filters to indicate time. So if you watch the restored version of the movie they used blue filters for night scenes

@ELViejito100

4 жыл бұрын

Mith, vampires can walk in the day, Dracula dit it

Orlok's weaker than Dracula when it comes to the sun Dracula stands in the sun, hypnotics don't work Orlok stands in the sun, turns to dust

@flo.g.

4 жыл бұрын

There are many movies in which Dracula gets killed by daylight tho

@jtcob8486

4 жыл бұрын

@@flo.g. dracula in the book is only weakened by sunlight, the reason pop culture thinks vampire's die from sunlight is because of this movie.

@jonathancampbell7798

4 жыл бұрын

@@flo.g. only because of this films ending

@filthycasual8187

3 жыл бұрын

Not just the hypnotics. NONE of his powers work in the sun unless it's dawn, noon, or dusk.

@stevencohen624

3 жыл бұрын

It depends on which version of Dracula you’re talking about though. The one from Bram Stoker’s novel could move about in daylight, but several from the movies could not.

Nosferatu has one of the most insane and impressive meta-narrative journeys in the history of cinema. Begins as an unofficial adaptation of the Dracula novel with the names of characters altered. Has legal trouble and almost every copy is destroyed. The novel is then officially adapted as a Hollywood film almost a decade later Then Nosferatu is remade in the 70s, this time USING the official character names from the novel upon which it was unofficially based on Then in 2001 they make a "Movie about making a movie" focused on the film but with a twist which is still ACTUALLY being about a vampire killing people. Now in 2024 the original film is getting a direct remake...over 100 years later.

Great stuff

the essential silent movie.

I still am beside myself why nobody has purchased the rights to shadow of the vampire and put it on Blu-ray it is available on standard DVD and has long since been cut out of print this movie has fallen Into Obscurity and it is a masterpiece

Der Fehler der Nachstellung liegt in den Helligkeitsverhältnissen. Wenn Murnau 1922 alle Szenen, die bei Nacht spielen, auch nachts gedreht hätte, wie in "Shadow of the Vampire" suggeriert, wären diese Aufnahmen wegen des mangelnden Lichts unbrauchbar gewesen. Selbstverständlich sind diese Aufnahmen also bei Tageslicht entstanden und nur durch die später bei der Vorführung verwendeten Farbblenden wurde dem Publikum deutlich gemacht, dass bei blauer Filmfärbung die Szene nachts spielt.

Amazing

I love this.

@dimitreze

6 жыл бұрын

thanks! :)

@SunBunz

4 жыл бұрын

@@dimitreze It's excellent! Really shows how much effort they put in.

Faves both

The climatic scene with the woman also features a sly reference to Nosferatu with the placing of the left hand….

Shadow of the vampire is my favorite vampire movie.

Watching this film about making the film was entertaining beyond Universe.

Izzard a bit more makeup than his counterpart.

Dafoe performs more wild and exaggerated. Schreck was more low profile and thus more menacing and scary. And by the way, Malkovich should have played the role!!!

@Afreshio

Жыл бұрын

you misunderstood his perfomance

Please update this for the upcoming Nosferatu film with Bill Skarsgård!! (He played Pennywise in the It remakes) It releases on Christmas of this year!

Shadow is brilliant

Brilliant film

This movie is gold

@enjoymacubingskills

3 жыл бұрын

You may ask which of those, i was meaning all the time the 1922 one yep.

These both were good skin-crawling movies

do you still read comments on older videos ? since you still have a few recent comparison videos i imagine you're still in touch with your channel so, i wanna say that i really like this video comparing the Orlok scenes, you sped up and muted all the right parts in the effort to sync them as closely as possible. although i imagine a direct request would be pretentious and a Nosferatu follow up could be "a bit much" but, _would you _*_ever_*_ so possibly _*_consider_*_ making a comparison video including _*_this_*_?_ kzread.info/dash/bejne/fnpnvNmRdaqaZbA.html heres one scene, but the whole film is worth a throught inspection to see if it is worth doing a triple or double scene comparison with either the original or the 2000 film(since there seems to be aspects borrowed from both versions interestingly enough)

@dimitreze

7 жыл бұрын

você é brasileiro?

@thiccboss4780

7 жыл бұрын

yes..........but that is irrelevant to me. will you consider it?

@dimitreze

7 жыл бұрын

só pra saber se eu poderia responder em português cara, eu não tenho vontade de fazer comparação de remakes porque iria abrir um precedente de fazer todos os remakes que existem, e tem muitos! até pensei no formato que seria, mas eu não ia curtir no fim das contas já tenho muito vídeo na fila pra fazer e fazendo vídeo pra remakes ia aumentar mais ainda e eu não tenho esse tempo todo :/ mas valeu pela sugestão :)

@thiccboss4780

7 жыл бұрын

i see.... but thank you anyway for clarifying your situation towards these videos. i'll await a more appropriate time in the far future to suggest this again , until then i'll continue to watch your content as it is very enjoyable so far.

@dimitreze

7 жыл бұрын

obrigado!! :)

I first saw this horror 1922 German comedy some kind of vampire in a SpongeBob episode

Did you know that one of them is part of the cast of Johnny English as well

@existenceisrelative

2 жыл бұрын

Whaaat? Actors never have more than one job in their lifetime.

Now he will be in the new movie also

SOTV was a good movie, but since it was filmed in an entirely different country (Luxembourg instead of the Czech Republic and Germany), they didn't have the same sets as in the original 1922 film, and they didn't even try. Still, it's one hell of a movie.

@LeoCalonder

Жыл бұрын

slovakia not the czech republic

@elijahblechman8633

9 ай бұрын

Glad to see I'm not the only one who's disappointed there was a major lack of attention to detail when it came to re-creating the original movie. Still it's a very minor Nitpick to an underrated classic

Holy fucking shit willem dafoe did an amazing job

perfect ... with one difference, Max Schreck was really a vampire, Willem Dafoe play only one ... a joke ^^

🦇😁

Remake?

@jonathancampbell7798

3 жыл бұрын

The remake is Nosferatu, the Vampyre (Free on youtube). Shadow of the Vampire is a mockumentary, where its how they filmed the movie, but Orlok is actually a real vampire.

Same plot

original orlock looked much better. The new ones face is too wide and fat. Not narrow and skinny enough.

@violatress

5 жыл бұрын

There's definitely a Klaus Kinski influence there, even some mannerisms from the Herzog remake made it into Dafoe's performance. It's not exactly a bad thing though, both Schreck and Kinski were iconic in that role, so why not. Dafoe added something from himself as well, took a very difficult, culturally charged role and made it his own. I'm a big fan of this film.

The life story of Rudy Guiliani

18th of may is my birthday...

The original film looks better

@dimitreze

5 ай бұрын

it's not a remake

Were. Is my. Crying Dracula. Self life. Birthed only 4. I self birthed!

In my estimation, "Shadow of the Vampire" is one of cinema's great embarrassments. It makes a legitimate biopic of Morneau's life impossible after this cornball cartoon with fantasy embellishments that were completely unnecessary. Whoever made the decisions concerning this film, as was the case with "Mommy Dearest", chose drastically wrong. Poor Udo Keir...standing there with nothing to do but mug while having portrayed one of the most interesting vampires of all time. Why to any of this?

@dimitreze

Жыл бұрын

it's not a biopic, stop being dumb

@rollinginabarrel1218

Жыл бұрын

*Murnau One of the most well known directors of early C20th cinema, both Germany and Hollywood. With all due respect, what kind of a 'movie channel' are you if you can't even get this man's name right?😀

@impmoviechannel3052

Жыл бұрын

@@dimitreze Uh, show biz either repeats what they consider a success for profit (how many Marylin Monroe or Nazi movies do we need?) or says it's been done before. the point it, they took the subject matter in this case -- a real person -- and with massive disrespect, made turned him into a buffoon to no point. If it's not a biopic, it sure isn't high art.

@impmoviechannel3052

Жыл бұрын

@@rollinginabarrel1218 First, I was agitated by this film -- when it came out and ever since -- because I do care about the subject matter for many reasons. Secondly, I'm not sure what happened to spellcheck but it wasn't caught there either. Most people I talk with in professional show biz have never heard of him or this film. I use it as an example of poor acting/director choices. Thirdly, having been in show biz over 40 years, rarely do people spell my name, the movie title, the name of the production company right, especially college-educated reporters with a press release in their hand. Thank you for that catch. I will spell his name right when I make my film about the man's experience of being homosexual during WW2, being trapped in a fox hole while his dead lover lay rotting a few feet away.

@Lizwindsor

Жыл бұрын

@@dimitreze I see you’re at it again calling people dumb. I guess this is your point in life?

The original seems better more authentic I honstely watched it in colour this week and forr 110 year old movie it was good