I run an arc panning bridge personally. I like being able to go from standard duals to panning without having to mess with the IPD
@iamnotacriminal
8 ай бұрын
Post a video
@shadyburnz129 ай бұрын
Awesome video bro
@rossanderson68429 ай бұрын
I'll say this - being a newcomer to this community, I purchased the MOD3. To my chagrin, I made the assumption that all that the MOD3 was just the addon of a lock bar; I was looking forward to having the option of screwing them in OR locking them. Really doesn't make sense to go through all this effort when a lockbar was all that was needed for the MOD 1 & 2.
@jerrybooher699 ай бұрын
I have ran both the MK3 and the NVB-58 the 58 is hands down IMO better no tools needed to adjust built in IPD stops definitely more rugged and 175$ cheaper.. definitely worth checking out
@yzhou05
9 ай бұрын
Main reason I went with mk3 panobridge is I like to be able to take off my thermal or pvs14 quickly. The panobridge has bilateral dovetail attachments available, the other options don’t Also the NVB58 is fixed at 58 deg mode and still weighs more.
@oldcuster3873
9 ай бұрын
I've been running the NVB 58, have a couple hundred hours on it. It's excellent
@yzhou05
9 ай бұрын
@@oldcuster3873 It does look very good for a dual PVS14 setup. As I said for PVS14+thermal monocular the Panobridge is more versatile as it enables bilateral dovetail attachments.
@FeralHawg-Armory4 ай бұрын
Hey. Thanks for the video. With the mini rail adapter for maybe a Flir, does the new mini rail adapter cant the Flir Breach or does it help to keep it in a flat panoramic view?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
4 ай бұрын
When using a thermal you want the 0 degree lock bar so they’re straight and not panned
@TyrannicalReigner5 ай бұрын
Would you say the mk3 negates the ability to fine tune a thermal to merge the image with your pvs14? Which one would you run for a dual band setup?
@OnMyGrizzle9 ай бұрын
Disappointing that it cannot be ran without the lock bar like the mk1/mk2. Why get rid of that feature with the mk3? Should of Kept the mk2 design and just added both lock bars to the kit. Old owners of the mk2 will have the best of both worlds.
@AlphaOneDesigns
8 ай бұрын
Mk1 and mk2 can use the lock bar
@OnMyGrizzle
8 ай бұрын
@@AlphaOneDesigns correct. To my knowledge you can’t purchase the mk1/mk2 anymore, only the mk3.
@schadenfreud339 ай бұрын
I wonder how this measures up to the panning rnvg?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
I'll be doing a video on the RPNVG. They both have their pros and cons. The biggest is the Panobridge articulates and the RPNVG doesn't
@mitchalexander69139 ай бұрын
Would it be an extra charge to upgrade to the allah lockbar ?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
They do charge an upgrade fee but the cost is low
@adamnguyen97939 ай бұрын
Cant you just not use the locking bars if you want the 40-75degree fov option?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
Not with the MK3. The arms will be floppy’
@andrewbrown1516 ай бұрын
Will this work for pvs14 & rh25?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
6 ай бұрын
Yes with the pictail for the RH and the Noisefighters dovetail arm accessory
Пікірлер: 25
Exactly what my old bridge needs! Thanks!
Always enjoy your content 👏
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
🙏🏼
I run an arc panning bridge personally. I like being able to go from standard duals to panning without having to mess with the IPD
@iamnotacriminal
8 ай бұрын
Post a video
Awesome video bro
I'll say this - being a newcomer to this community, I purchased the MOD3. To my chagrin, I made the assumption that all that the MOD3 was just the addon of a lock bar; I was looking forward to having the option of screwing them in OR locking them. Really doesn't make sense to go through all this effort when a lockbar was all that was needed for the MOD 1 & 2.
I have ran both the MK3 and the NVB-58 the 58 is hands down IMO better no tools needed to adjust built in IPD stops definitely more rugged and 175$ cheaper.. definitely worth checking out
@yzhou05
9 ай бұрын
Main reason I went with mk3 panobridge is I like to be able to take off my thermal or pvs14 quickly. The panobridge has bilateral dovetail attachments available, the other options don’t Also the NVB58 is fixed at 58 deg mode and still weighs more.
@oldcuster3873
9 ай бұрын
I've been running the NVB 58, have a couple hundred hours on it. It's excellent
@yzhou05
9 ай бұрын
@@oldcuster3873 It does look very good for a dual PVS14 setup. As I said for PVS14+thermal monocular the Panobridge is more versatile as it enables bilateral dovetail attachments.
Hey. Thanks for the video. With the mini rail adapter for maybe a Flir, does the new mini rail adapter cant the Flir Breach or does it help to keep it in a flat panoramic view?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
4 ай бұрын
When using a thermal you want the 0 degree lock bar so they’re straight and not panned
Would you say the mk3 negates the ability to fine tune a thermal to merge the image with your pvs14? Which one would you run for a dual band setup?
Disappointing that it cannot be ran without the lock bar like the mk1/mk2. Why get rid of that feature with the mk3? Should of Kept the mk2 design and just added both lock bars to the kit. Old owners of the mk2 will have the best of both worlds.
@AlphaOneDesigns
8 ай бұрын
Mk1 and mk2 can use the lock bar
@OnMyGrizzle
8 ай бұрын
@@AlphaOneDesigns correct. To my knowledge you can’t purchase the mk1/mk2 anymore, only the mk3.
I wonder how this measures up to the panning rnvg?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
I'll be doing a video on the RPNVG. They both have their pros and cons. The biggest is the Panobridge articulates and the RPNVG doesn't
Would it be an extra charge to upgrade to the allah lockbar ?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
They do charge an upgrade fee but the cost is low
Cant you just not use the locking bars if you want the 40-75degree fov option?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
9 ай бұрын
Not with the MK3. The arms will be floppy’
Will this work for pvs14 & rh25?
@NITEWALKER-NIGHTVISION
6 ай бұрын
Yes with the pictail for the RH and the Noisefighters dovetail arm accessory