Why do you think he did this move at the last hand? What's your thinking ?

@ramirohergenreder9713

Жыл бұрын

Is it common to have so many bluffs in NL 5k? Upload 88 there is an error I think according to my logic haha

@peteradam2600

Жыл бұрын

I don't really know. But he has to have a good explanation for this because he is not a rec as we see. Pretty interesting hand tho.

@dantonkull6491

Жыл бұрын

Cest bizarre car le solver sur gtowizard joue la main comme lui mais cest tres contre intuitif. Move suspect?

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

@@dantonkull6491 Impossible que wizard prenne ce size . Il s'est au moins gouré de size. Très bon intuitif, je me méfierai mais sans plus, j'ai vu des bourdes dans ses plays aussi.

@sikheing5166

Жыл бұрын

he just targeted your flop bet size? Personally would bet 75% w AK , AQ, any pair, What Ax would you bet 50% on that flop? You wouldnt bet 50% w pairs on that flop either? And the fact that you tanked it for a while which Ax generally wouldnt have tanked to the point that you have used ur timer? He also used his timer on flop probably was hesitating to check raise you on the flop which I also would if i'm a non believer from ur sizing. Just my opinion

Technical details on hands I played : (its long :p) 10:02 77 giant non AI raise Preflop / (+Profils Rules) It's a cool trick I use vs 20/30bb recs. Some of them don't really care on the Preflop size and overcall vs my size while not really noticing my big size. And some whales just want to see the flop and the calling range is inelastic to my sizing. So I do this massive raise size close to ALLIN. Also, some recs knows calling the all in with J2 is a spew. But here I might let them with the excuse in their mind that "i want to see a flop". Why I think 900 is better than AI ? Let's see that Let's simulate with the "3 profils/scenarios rules". Let's take 3 profiles. Each of them have a different and caricatural reaction. 1rst Profil, he calls the same range when you go AllIN/when you raise900. 2nd Profil, he calls more when I do 900 compared to All In. Ev 900>AI 3rd Profil, he calls more hands when you do ALLIN compared to 900. EV AI>900 If I'm vs 1rst profil , it approximately doesn't change anything If I'm vs the 2nd profil , I win money by doing this sizing compared to AI If I'm vs the 3rd profil, I loose money by doing 900 compared to AI. Here, My level of certainty is high enough to consider this player will not call more the AI compared to 900, which mean it's very unluckily he folds more against this size compared to AI. So the probability of scenario 1 (profil n*1) and scenario 2 is way higher. Which means (IF we believe it doesn't change the EV post given the spr) P(S1,S3)>P(S2) ( P=probability and S=scenario) So : EV Bet 900>Bet AI This is the metric I use IG. It's not easy at the beginning, but with practice I do it very quick. Profils have to be classified with the most "accurate category" which here was whale. If I have no info on the fish, I will classified and do the 3 scenarios calc considering it's a std fish. If I know he is CS, I will do the 3 scenarios rules considering he is a CS rec. -------- 2:0 1 A8o float and OVB I expect an overfold frequency on the river when he choosed this sizing on the turn. The merged turn 1/2 bet from recs are in general too weak hands oriented. Weak hands will often X river, which leads to a better EQR for my hand (EQ realisation) which indirectly lead to more fold EQ (cause he plays more often the B turn X River, compared to a polar bet (a polar bet is more B turn B river)) We can raise on the turn, but for clairvoyance I prefer to play this way. We might have SD + clean outs in the calling line. I don't think I will call complete air ball if I don't know the guy btw. River I just sized up to have more FE. We can discuss about the FE and RR (risk reward of each sizing). I think there is a lot of elasticity depending my sizing. Afterward I prefer betting 1100$. Thinking about showing my bluff is possible, however I prefer to pressure him consistently compared to show this and being uncertain about the FE of my bluffs in the futur. We can go even further in the thinking and ask ourselves which 11xx$ sizing has the most FE (1100?1133?1171?1199?). I might think we will never have an answer with 100% certainty. Even with trying to judge empirically , I will have too many cognitive biais (sample biais, confirmation biais etc...). There is a concept I called Max1 and Max2. Max1 is the max EV sizing in bluff , and Max2 is the maximum sub size (here 1123 is a subsizing of 1100). Both combined we have the best sizing. Exemple : If we build a function which links EV and betsizing in this specific spot given his range (F:Bet:->EV) : Mathematically, the function will have a maximum (Max1), the maximum of the function; it can have a local maximum (called Max2). Maybe the Max1 in this spot is 1100$ (best sizing taking into account FE and RR). And Max2 might be 1199$ (especially if the player has the feeling of being milk when the size is finishing by 99$. So the best sizing is around 1100 and the local maximum is 1199$. M1=1100 M2=1199$. I think on most sites, recs don't care of that accuracy of your size, so I will consider vs weaker players to finish my size by .9 because they will be inelastic. This in the long run might make a massive difference on your WR. It's not mathematically rigorous but it's just to understand the idea and how I think ingame to find the best sizing. And last thing, some recs don't care at all about your sizing, so don't overthink too much sometimes ! Typical exemple of the whole Max 1 Max 2 when I had 82o. --------- 3:08 82o smiley got insta-called The smiley was here to induce a fold. I have no clues how it affects them, I'm testing. I do believe to generate a bit more FE, but it heavily depends on the guy. I will generally try not to make them call if I see they are more on a fold. It's going to take time to have enough sample size on how/which smiley works the best. Find it funny to think about it, even if it's not too important and playing w/o it is completely fine. We can discuss about the fe I have in these spots when I bet the river. Recs overfold close to every path of the gametree, so I'm fine overbluffing if I see that the rec is not a big CS. The 299 (instead of 300) trick works on recs, especially Chinese recs who are smarter than the average rec. But doesn't work on each guy. I do believe I have more fee using this sizing. (Reaching imo Max1 and Max2). The smiley induced the call. Got karma. ----------- 4:08 92o call river. nothing special, too much bluff potential here. Still a tough spot cause if he decides to bluff a lower size or just not bluff the call is absolutely terrible. Saw later he was not bluffing that much; so the call is indeed terrible XD. (Ok without infos imo). ---------- 5:27 TT TT soul read I typically choose to value bet vs recs depending on his timing. I think timing tell vs reg is a much complex and wider topic compared ton recs TT. Here the snap check gives way too much infos. Long story short I think given his timing his range is over-weighted on the Kh Qh and 3rdpair- region. TT is the best hand enough to ValueBet. BUT, we have a problem, we still need to get called by worst :p. I expected the rec to be curious enough on my line and also not to be too scared of my sizing. We can do 60$ instead of 50 I think. Small detail. --------- 6:07 ATS XR ATs has to play this way super often. There are no reasons I deviate from GTO here against a very good player. BTW cool tips , there are also no reasons at your stakes to block Ac because Axcc often bet flop or turn as IP. You don't block that many good hands either with the A of clubs, so no need to specifically has Ac. I prefer to block other flushes/strong bluffcatchers. In this spot at 5k NL I will bluff some Ac. You probably need 2 raise sizing here, so you can also bluff some other types of hands. I have a lot of bluff in my perceive region ! That's why I will take 40/50seconds to calculate how much bluffs I can have in order to have a correct bluff value ratio. I will do my best to have bluffs in close to every lines. Of course if you play micro/low/mid stakes or live poker, bluff 100% of the time if the spot is great, you should not care about over bluffing, cause pools are with a lot of players, and players are usually slow to adapt. Having no bluffs in some spots is fine too. Only spots I'm overbluffing at 5k is if I know the guy perceive me as nit, or he is shooting 5KNL, I will tend to be over aggro. ------ 8:21 T9 vs Ignacio (Nachos on PS). I don't play him that much cause he mainly play NL10k+. I think he is one of the most aggressive player I ever seen in HS. It was played ok. Because I don't play against him I'm fine deviating a bit by choosing what I think is the best action. Didn't check the sim but pretty confident we mix Flop turn. I play range X flop, even on double BW. It takes a while to explain why, will do a video on that later if you guys want. River, it's tough to know if block or check is better. He needs to raise the air region vs this size and do some tough calls even if I expect him to find close to all of them if he thinks he has to. If you play NL200 and less, most player will not value bet thin enough, and some of them might have 0 bluffs with the air region (because they think the pool is X calling all the time. You X T9 due to several reasons. OESD is not always a bet here. Not because "you need to have str8 when you X" which is not the most important argument, but because T9 also have incentives to X, because you have a better EQR in the Xing line , better EQR = better EV. You have a better EQR because when it goes x x and you hit a 9 or a T , you have more EQ compared to if you bet the turn and you hit a T or a 9 on the river. ------ 7:16 I believe when he uses his sizing that he has 0 XF . Even if he folds, it's often with a range that wouldn't have put any money on turns. We have a mandatory jam. Only move possible if we don't except a fold by an Ah at this spr is to CLICK. Just to allow random air spazzing or calling. Which happens rarely but if we don't expect fold from Ax in the Xminraise into AI line, why jamming flop :) ? I'm not playing 5k no right now, GG down my RB a lot so I'm grinding other sites + I'm on a poker project that takes most of my time. I plan to comeback there full time in 2,3 months max. And grind 5KNL minimum. Also have to do specific technical study to be more accurate in some spots (also working on Highstakes Super Explo lines😁).

@zzxyyxxz4976

Жыл бұрын

it seems like you have like a years worth of videos planned for the future given how many times you've said there are more videos coming haha but it would be sick to see some BvB strats discussed like your hand vs Nacho

@danielh7937

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for adding the deeper technical analysis of the hands! I know its a lot of extra work for you, but it makes the value of the video 10x ❤

@rafaelsinn4721

Жыл бұрын

Yoo, I just read through your comment and was blown away. I am already learning a lot watching you but getting the writing explanation of all your thoughts afterwards is awesome! Thank you! Btw a video about timing tells on fish and one about your SB strategy, like why you range check would be super interesting

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

@@zzxyyxxz4976 Only have a few months but I publish videos every 3 days.

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

@@rafaelsinn4721 will think about this :)

Hi Yolan, I really want to know your opinion on the 88 min raise, after you b50 otf and b75 ott and you have all the strong hands. Of course flush gets there ott which changes things. I would predict that most 5knl are strong players so he probably knew what he was doing?

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

I don’t have a clue Emanuel lol, that’s why i asked in the comment section . He is a strong player so there might be a reason but i still didn’t find it.

@dragamoja

Жыл бұрын

@@YolanCohenPoker Not to mention you also raised from EP:) I looked it up in gto wizard for nl1k structure - against flop b50 88 is almost pure fold, even with a spade, it calls just 88sd 35% off the time, but then OTT 88 with a spade that is left actually never calls but just raises and folds about the same:)

That last hand in NL10000 was... exciting at least

Grande jolan top.

I think you have to jam when you get there to that specific river. You're blocking the nuts. Sure you're blocking JT combos but yeah that seemed like a complete punt by him to pull that move.

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

I dont mind raising 88 but this sizing is just bad. Yeah I hesitate a lot between jam turn and jam river. Retrospectively I think click turn is a really cool move. Anyway , gg to him :)

O scusami o scritto male il tuo nome yolan, sei forte bro.

Wrong emoji v the fish

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

Yeah 😂. Or just all emojis were bad. I dunno.

@jimmyballs5662

Жыл бұрын

@@YolanCohenPoker think the only emoji that woulda worked is ‘you suck’ what you think

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

@@jimmyballs5662I think it depends on the « smart level » from the rec. Vs him I think it would have work, otherwise I would be careful vs other guys

a 3:06 tu mises 299$ il serais pas mieux de bet 300$ pour des blocker psycologique?

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

I explained in the comment above, I reversed it because I judged I was against a fish looking smarter than other recs.

Wtf the 88 hand.. IT does not make any sense to me. I Am playing nl25 and 50.. Its crazy sometimes how ppl is playing this game now srsly.. 0 respect to my OR., getting 3 bet from villians oop with 45s, 89s, any Kx S... I dont know this game anymore. Time to study more?

7:30 no sense in shoving, should click it

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

Nah this guy always have an A so in this spot jam is the best move. But yeah in general click is better.

first

@YolanCohenPoker

Жыл бұрын

Zanama its you?:p

@moiexposito6913

Жыл бұрын

@@YolanCohenPoker pas du tout