I was just looking at the 28mm f1.4 lol. Thanks for saving me from myself :)

@lilnape2604

Ай бұрын

I noticed your comment after watching your video. I’m sorry but his take is absolutely incorrect. “Not sharp” … tested similar to the Otus 28. Way better rendering too as the otus series has meh bokeh characteristics, ive compared the two. It’s an absolute masterpiece. His take on the 105 is equally as bad, another masterpiece. I believe his disdain for China manufacturing is definitely influencing his view. That and constantly talking in hyperbole. You can find the 28 1.4 for 900-1000 used. Bargain.

@lilnape2604

Ай бұрын

I will say sigma’s 28 1.4 is also excellent. But it’s a behemoth and doesn’t render as well IMO.

@ericfore

19 күн бұрын

The 28mm 1.4e is a spectacular lens. It has nice falloff, focuses fairly close, and is perfect for environmental portraits. Not sure if it's suitable for video, since I don't use it for that. Mine is made in Japan, for what it's worth. The 105 is also a gem of a lens. You should give them both a try.

Hello there I have the 35mm 1.8G DX version on my Nikon d3300, how do you rate this lens?

YES YES YES! Great video Ken, I have been waiting for this one, excellent knowledge and advice as ever!

Thank you for your advice! I’ve gotten some great lenses in the past because of you! Plus you saved me lots of money! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

Hi Ken good day i have a question does the old nikon lens or the new nikon lens attached in to adaptor in a fuji body does in meters.? or like can you use the ttl on the camera.? thanks in advanced.

what about old manual focus lenses like the Nikkor Ai or Ai-s 24mm f/2.8? How does it compare to the f/1.4 & f/1.8 versions

Any love for the old Konica Hexanon 50's? I've been having a bit of a film renaissance and picked up the 50/1.4 for £56 with a 'free' working fs-1 camera attached.

Great review like always ken, don’t forget the nikkor 200mm f2 review please sr thanks for your time

Each time you post such a video i go on second hand wesbsites to scan for a good deal on one of these haha, many thanks!

Hi Ken, how's it going? I've got a D7200 and trying to build a collection of prime lenses from wide to near telephoto Currently looking for a 20ish mm prime but I am really on a budget What's a decently good wide ish prime that's also cheap? 20mm, 24mm or 28mm 2.8D? I already have the 35mm DX 1.8G and 50mm 1.8D

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

24mm 1.8G .. 20mm 3.5 AIS ...35mm 1.8 DX :)

@PhiggysDOTcom

5 жыл бұрын

Or maybe Kens favourite independent lens maker SIGMA 😡I have the EX 20mm f1.8 24mm f1.8 and 28mm f1.8 and they can be had at good prices used if your on a tight budget. 🙁sorry Ken but I'm sure you love Sigma deep down 😂😂😂

Hey Ken...second question...I really like the 35mm focal length for indoor groups of people. I'm looking for sharp images. Sorry I had to say it. Should I go for the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 for a whopping $1700 or put the money into the 24-70mm 2.8 VR? As I noted in my other post about the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 FX, one often doesn't shoot groups at 1.4, but the reason for it is the overall quality of the 1.4 lens. But would I be better off spening the money on the 24-70 VR for indoor shooting? Any advice would be appreciated. I know my details might be a little lacking.

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

Take a look at the reviews of the Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 G2 lens. It has VR and is cheaper than the Nikon. 24mm is useful for group shots in a cramped spaces and 70mm is useful when you can't get closer to fill the frame or crop out distracting backgrounds.

You mentioned Tamron bringing 115mm f/1.2 lens ,is that right,Also you you rate your image steps wise / Thanks

@alitagreenalitas

2 жыл бұрын

He said Sigma, and it ended being the 105mm f1.4

I thought to buy the 58mm 1.4G and the 105mm 1.4E at some point, to complement with the Canon 50mm 1.2L and the 85mm 1.2L II that render dreamy looking images wide open. Was wondering if it’s worth buying a fast prime wide angle, given how good are the Nikon 14-24mm 2.8G and the Canon 24-70mm 2.8L II, because fast aperture gives a shallow DOF only if the subject is right in front of the lens?

@PunjabiGymBeats

4 жыл бұрын

TheGreatLoco 58mm is just dreamy bokeh lens, have tried most of the nikon pro glass, so far 58, 35 are my fav.

Ken, so what is your opinion on the older 28mm f1.4D Aspheric. This lens used, still commands a high price and I'm wondering why. Thanks

@craigjohnchronicles2504

3 жыл бұрын

@@troyphillips1077 - Late response, but if other people are wondering maybe this will help. The 28/1.8D has a beautiful old rendering. I loved the lens, but was it worth the $3,000 price tag back in the day? Maybe. It was the only fast wide angle lens at the time. High demand kind of dictated prices - I bought mine for $2,500. ...Then it kind of became a collectors item when the 28/1.4E came out - but that steep 28/1.4E price didn't help bring the 28/1.4D price down. Low and behold the Z cameras, and the new big shift from DSLR cameras. This Z mount with the FTZ adapter basically renders the 28/1.4D useless aside from manual focus. So the pricing has come down significantly into the $1,200-$1,500 price range. So finally less expensive than a new 28/1.4E. The good thing is, Nikon still makes the 28/1.4E, so the used prices of those lenses is still fairly inexpensive. A good used 28/1.4E can be found for about $1,000, and it's worth every single cent if you're looking for something a bit wider than a 50mm lens, but not wanting to go quite as wide as 20 or 24mm. Ken has his opinions on these lenses; and having used all but the 105/1.4, I disagree with most of his assessments. Save for the 50/1.4G - that lens is just shit. However, the 28/1.4E is literally the GEM in the Nikon AF-S prime line-up. This lens is magic. It has a fast accurate AF - far better than what I experienced with the Nikon 24/1.4G, 35/1.4G, 50/1.4G, 58/1.4G, and the 85/1.4G. It's damn sharp wide open, and the rendering is beautiful, with a nice touch of mico contrast. The field of view and that bit of micro contrast gives it a nice 'pop'. They only way I'm going to sell mine is if Nikon comes out with a 28/1.4 S that's at least equal to this one, so I can go native to the Z cameras. But even then... it'll be hard to part with this lens. It's just phenomenal.

i hope u review the tamron 90mm f2.8 macro. the new generation. latest one not previous.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

i did that already :)

Is the Nikkor 58mm 1.4g better than the Voigtländer 58mm 1.4?I own the Voigt but i miss the Autofocus.Has the 50mm 1.4g really plasticelements?How compare the zeiss 35mm f2 to the nikkor 35mm 1.4g ?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

its sharper, but the Voigt dominates it for image , BW, bokeh...... but hell the Voigt is made 10X better and costs 1/3rd as much as the nikkor

Ken what’s the verdict on the Nikkor 35 1.4 Ais

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

its sok, rather mehhhh however always priced cheap

The 85mm 1.4 is a Highly idiosyncratic lens. You have to know how to use it. As u said, sharpness isn't everything, but mine is fine on that aspect and the way it renders is amazing. Either I lucked out on an exceptional specimen or you're vastly underestimating this lens.

@drparham

5 жыл бұрын

I feel like he was using 1.4 ais and 1.4 g interchangeably cause the G isnt as good as the ais

@lucylapalette3828

5 жыл бұрын

The 85mm 1.4 gets better and sharper with a smaller aperture opening, such 2.2/2.8 etc. One does not have sacrifice too much on the Bokeh. I generally prefer to photograph outdoors and the pics look great. I guess, it also depends on the camera, sometimes my cropped sensor D5600’s pics look superb, while lousy on D850. Believe it or not. 85 f1.4 is not an easy lens, try it with a tripod on high megapixels cameras. I had 85 f1.8, I like that one as well. Might get it back.

@johnrflinn

3 жыл бұрын

I believe this lens was used in the film Blowup.

I have the 50 f1.4D, purchased new in about 2000. I used to think it was great, and I have used it a lot. A. Lot. Then 2 things happened. First, I looked at my Lightroom history and discovered the only images from it I like are at f4 or f8. Then, I followed Ken's recommendation and bought a 50 1.8 E-series, which kicks the 1.4's butt, IMO, at all apertures. YMMV. I also have the 85 f1.4D, also bought new when it was current. When I was using it for theatre photography, I liked it a lot. But, again, I currently prefer the 85 AIS 2 or the 100 E-series for my photography (which is just for fun, these days). Sometimes I really want to not agree with Ken, but then I look at my own images with the same lenses that I like. I usually have to change my mind.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

hey Byron! the cheapie 1.8 50 E series :)

Hi Ken, What do you think about the 50 mm afd 50mm 1.4?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

thats THE BEST value 50mm lens for the money

@Theosax1

6 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis thanks a lot ken!

The 28mm 1.4 is one of my favourite lenses, and I have owned a lot! It is expensive but sharpness and rendering is stunning. Oh an I actually shoot with my lenses ;)

@TheAsaSan

4 жыл бұрын

Ken is wrong considering the 28mm. I testet one and bought an other copy - i have to say, the 28mm 1.4 is a gem. better than the 35mm 1.4 (focus issues) and even better than the 24mm 1.4 (I owned both, the 35mm and the 24mm).

@craigjohnchronicles2504

3 жыл бұрын

The 28/1.4E is the best AF-S prime lens Nikon makes. By a long shot. If you can find a refurb for $1,500 or a used one in good shape for $1,000, it's a steal. This is the one AF-S Nikon Prime (without getting into the exotics) that is worth every penny.

simply the best Doc....

What is your opinion about Nikon 24-70mm f2.8G Nano OR Nikon 24-120mm Nano VR better for a General purpose Lens?

@kathodosdotcom

5 жыл бұрын

the G is worse than 1st version

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

He recommends the Nikon 24-70 f2.8G. The 24-120mm f4G, is not recommended--not sharp and has chromatic aberration (purple fringing). In his other videos, he recommends the 35-70mm 2.8D. It's an older (cheaper and out of production) lens. If you can do without a zoom lens, you may want to look at getting the 35mm 1.4G. (If you need wider or telephoto, he also recommends the 24mm f/1.4G and 85mm f/1.8G.)

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

Take a look at the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2. It's cheaper and shorter than Nikon's 24-70mm and has vibration reduction.

So was he saying 35 1.8 DX has the problems or the FX version?

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

It's the FX version (listed on eBay as 35mm 1.8G ED). 6:26 on the video timeline. In his other videos, he highly recommends the DX version (35mm 1.8 DX) as a must have for DX cameras.

I've have, & use the 28/50/85 f1.4D's since the F4Ef5 film days. On film, I liked their softer wide but yes, I can see how you mean on a D3S/D4S. I picked the 105 f2D DC instead of the 1.4. I'm liking the 24mm f1.4 (Idk if I'd buy it yet). Update: After this I went back to my trusty 85/1.4. It's not just it's buttery smooth but the colour render.

Also, the use of a tri - or a monopod helps a lot with a pics quality, but with 85mm f 1.4 the difference is apparent.

If you had to choose then between the tamron 35 f1.8 VC and the nikon 35 f1.4g?

@Zerglot

6 жыл бұрын

Tamron 35 is so bad...

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

easy, the nikkor 35 1.4

Hi Theoria, I'm looking for a 28mm lens. I know you HATE the Zeiss Otus - which I can't afford either the price or weight. In this review, you also dislike the Nikkor 28mm 1.4 in this review - my question is whether the lens you critiqued was the latest/current 28mm AF-S 1.4 E ED version or an earlier model? I'm also seriously considering the Zeiss 28mm Distagon - I own it Canon mount (also the 35mm in both), the Nikon 28mm 1.8G and the Sigma 28mm 1.4 art. I'd really appreciate your thoughts. I've watched dozens of your reviews and love your decisive and unapologetic opinions.

You, sir, are wrong about everything! As a woodworker, my chisels are much sharper than my knives.

With a cropped sensor, which prime lens would you use? 35 or 50mm?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

i use the 24mm 1.8G as fave

@blizzbee

2 жыл бұрын

If only one lens on dx, i'd pick 24mm 1.4G.

To each his own. I have the 20 f/1.8, 24 f/1.4, 35 f/2.D (most recent purchase!), 50 f/1.4, 60 f/2.8D, 85 f/1.4, 105 f/2.8 G micro (made in JAPAN it's so old), 135 AF f/2D DC, 200 f/4 D micro + the 200-500. Yes, yes, 35 1.8 vs 1.4 vs 2. I love that thang. 35 f/2D

Right on time: I’m in the market for some primes.👍🏽

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

prime time baby !

@MrCochise71

6 жыл бұрын

Scott Miller all about the Prime's baby!

Are the 85 f1.4d and the 85 f1.4g. The same image quality wise.

@zfoxfire

4 жыл бұрын

From what I understand, a G is optically identical to a D. G series however lack an aperture ring and have an internal focus motor. D series cannot auto-focus without a compatible body.

you were referring to G series lenses only correct? Not the 28 1.4D or 50 1.4D or 85 1.4D.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

yes, the new G series.... def not the 85 1.4 D, got 2 of those, theyre great.

I am a portraitist and event photographer. The 85mm 1.4 gets better with a smaller aperture opening such as 2.2 and higher. I guess, it also depends, what camera you use it on. I used it on D5600 as well as on D850, and The pics look great, but yes, there is fringing. Which can be corrected in pp. I like the smoothness of the Bokeh; try it outside and with window lighting, no problem there. Yes, he is right, the focus is very limited, meaning 1 eye is sharper and the rest blurry, e.t.c., just go to f2.8, and it will look better. The 85 1.8 is also very decent. 50mm 1.8 is ok for general photography; depends, what quality you are looking for, I find the skin tones and textures grainy, not very good. Still looking for a good 50mm . My D850 camera dictates. I love 70-200 EFled VIII, excellent pairing with D850. The ED and VR make difference. Just keep on trying.

IF you had a choice - video for the Z6 - between Legacy Nikon 35mm or the Z 35mm and the Sigma Art 24mm 1.4 (which is pretty close $$$ to the Z 35mm 1.8) for MANUALLY pulling focus on a Rhino Arc II Slider (with Rhino Focus) where you can set two focus mark points. Using for actors in Studio with controlled LED lighting) I hear you can NOT really set focus on a Z lens because it’s “electronic” (?) predictably... but you set focus on the legacy lenses ie if you turn the focus back to a previous position you will get focus on the same object at the same distance.

Thank you for your reviews, you have never lead me wrong.

btw What are the reasons you don't own a 50mm f1.4 for??

Just finding this video because I'm looking for a 28mm AFD lens for both my F3 and my F6. I can't find anything comparable that works for both. Anyone have a suggestion?

Is the Nikon 28mm f/1.4 D also a bad prime lens. Have the opportunity to buy it for dirt cheap. Have only AF-D metal prime lenses. My favorite lens is the Nikon AF DC 105mm f/2D. Would be great to have Ai-s prime lenses for my today purchased Nikon F3T Black in mint state.

@RobTiff0818

Жыл бұрын

I have to completely disagree with Ken on the 28 1.4E. I can't understand how he can like/love the 58mm 1.4G and the 105 1.4E and not absolutely love the 28 1.4E. It is the most beautiful rendering lens I've ever used, and it's unbelievably sharp in the center, and very sharp on the edges. I truly believe he didn't try the lens before talking about it. I've never talked to anybody that used it that didn't think it was the best wide (ish) prime they'd ever used.

@RobTiff0818

Жыл бұрын

My gosh, he also hated the 105 1.4E. Never mind - completely disregard his opinions.

is the 50mm 1.4d any good

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

best value 50mm, yuuup

I like the manual focus Nikkor ais 20mm F2.8, 28mm F2, and the 35mm F1.4 but not wide open except for perhaps the 28mm. The ais 50mm F 1.8 is also very good. I don't believe any of these have plastic elements and they were all made in Japan.

I have had the Voigtlander 58mm for years, and after being stored for a while an insect ended up inside the lens between the elements. Apparently it would cost most than the lens is worth to get it out. It being recommended here just adds to the frustration.

I've been shooting with Nikon since 2004. Had lot of these lenses you mention or at least tried them. After i sold all my nikon gear i kept only 24 1.4. Mostly also because they don't sell well used... but it renders awesome and creates unique images. Honestly i think canon has much better NEW lenses then nikon and cheaper equivalents. Sadly their sensors suck... but thats another topic

@lucylapalette3828

5 жыл бұрын

jiri pastrnak hi Jiri, sounds like you are the Czech by the origin. So am I. If you ever feel like talking about photography, Nikon versus Canon, please let me know, because i am constantly in between these two brands. I do mainly portraits and events. Greetings Hana from Toronto. I do agree, I also like the Canon bodies better, unfortunately, technology lags behind. Cheers!

There are some test with the 50 mm 1.4 on my flikr page, it is great for 280€ .. Anderson Quattra

Hi Ken! which one for night street photography : Nikon 24mm 1.4 or Nikon 35mm 1.4...?.Thanks man...!

@kathodosdotcom

5 жыл бұрын

oh fuk, easy, 24mm

7 months ago I watched this video and requested you to review Nikon's new S line lenses, like 50 1.2, 85 1.2 etc. 7 months later I watched this video once again now and I'm still waiting for your reviews of Nikon's new lenses for the Z cameras. When will you return to lens reviews? Your lens reviews are the best in the whole internet.

Hey Ken I am switching from my Sony a7rII and looking to get some lenses to start I was thinking the 35mm 1.4 and the 70-200 2.8 fl ed or whatever the newest one was. Is there anything else you'd recommend instead or think is better to start? I am getting the Nikon D850. Thanks KEN!

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

for shooting what and what budget? well i own all the current 70 200, and oddly the much cheaper G2 tamron is better than my $2800 70 200 E FL nikkor in many ways.......however the nikkor is more lightweight and has better no-bump buttons. i dont have enough info on WHAT you wanna shoot? :)

@tjmperez

6 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis truly not an unlimited budget but not enough for a 200mm f2! Lmfao! I shoot a lot of portraits and headshots and products photography and lifestyle that’s why I was thinking that 35mm 1.4 and the 70-200 2.8. So you think that tamron 2.8 is better and only $1300 which is nice. I am trying to become a full time photographer and trying to get a base lens collection. Also didn’t know what you thought about the 24 1.4 vs 35 1.4 for product photography and lifestyle! Thank you for getting back to me brother! Huge fan and really happy to be coming to the Nikon family! As soon as I can get a damn D850! Hahaha

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

what breed of product? you need a macro lens. Better still one that does macro and headshots, what camera? Tokina 100mm 2.8 macro.....70 200 g2 tamron... 35mm 1.4 used 135mm f2 DC nikkor headshots

@tjmperez

6 жыл бұрын

Mostly drinks and food not so much smaller products and stuff like backpacks for some hunting companies. I am going to be getting the Nikon D850.

@akkual

6 жыл бұрын

Interested to know that what makes you jump out of Sony? Not that I like Sonys (I don't).

Totally agree Ken! The 24 f1.8, the 35 f1.4, and the 85 f1.8 are must owns in the Nikon line. The 50 f1.4 and the 105 f1.4 are dogs with fleas. I hate my 50 1.4 G. The 58 Nikon....Meh...I don't really like Nikon's version for portraiture...Well I did until you pointed me at the Voigtlander! :)

@PhiggysDOTcom

6 жыл бұрын

So how do the older Nikon AFD and manual lenses of the same focal lengths compare in quality ? Are they a better purchase ?

@craigjohnchronicles2504

3 жыл бұрын

@@PhiggysDOTcom The Nikon 85/1.4D is a league of it's own. The crinkle lenses - 28/1.4D, 85/1.4D, 105/2DC, 135/2DC and the 180/2.8ED - are all outstanding. The 135/2DC can be a bit glowey, but the image rendering is just special on all of those lenses. Wish the AF was compatible with the Z mount camera bodies. The Manual Focus lenses are so fun to use with the mirrorless cameras (save for Fuji cameras). They suck with DSLR cameras, including the Nikon DF. They have a whole new life with the Z cameras and focus magnification as well as focus peeking. The gems in this area are the 28/2 AIS, 50/1.2 AIS, 85/2AIS, 105/2.5 AIS, 135/2.8AI, 200/4 AIS. These particular lenses are small, fantastically built lenses with wonderfully dampened manual focus rings. The 50/1.2 has a crazy beautiful rendering wide open. They all have very good sharpness wide open, even on these high-res digital sensors, and have a beautiful rounded film-like image rendering. These lenses can be had for dirt cheap prices compared to their AF counter parts. ...but there are so many other Nikon Manual Focus lenses to explore. Some can be a bit expensive. There is a 1297 page thread on the Fred Miranda website, exclusively about using Nikon Manual Focus lenses. Highly recommend you check this out... www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/929565

28mm 1.4 is great ! What is your problem with it man?

Please review Nikon's new S line lenses. I miss your lens reviews so much nowadays!

you hate the 50mm 1.4g or 1.4d? i heard 50mm 1.4d is good. bought one.

@kathodosdotcom

4 жыл бұрын

the D version is great

I have all the bad ones!!! So for a good wide angle, i should get the 24mm f1.4

I own and use the Nikkor 35mm f/1.4, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4 prime lenses. I also have a 21mm f/1.4 but it is a Leitz M-mount for my Leica M6 rangefinder.

I have oned several 50mm 1.8 ais, es and still own a 1.8d. some of my best fotos where taken with the 1.8d. Then I bought a 35mm af-d f2 lens and WOW this lens has a beautiful color rendition and I can use this lens on Nikon FA body with manual focus, the 50mm 1.8d is not usable with manual focus because of a thight focus ring and because I dont like to have alot of gear I bought the 50mm af-d 1.4. The same build quality as the 35mm af-d and same color rendition and is sharper than the 1.8d and I can use it with my Nikon FA. At 1.4 it is soft but sharp from f2 on. The 1.8d I have to stop down to f2.8 to get sharp image. Now I have to sell my 50mm 1.8d...

24mm 1.4 Sigma art is crazy, wow factor for sure

Damn... just got the 50mm 1.4 :D

@twoblink

6 жыл бұрын

The Tamron 45mm f1.8 is superior to both of Nikon's 50mm g series.

Compared to what?

What about the Nikkor 35mm f2d¿

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

He recommends the 35mm 1.8G DX, and the 35mm 2 D. If you have a DX (crop sensor) camera, get the 35mm 1.8G DX lens. The D-series lenses only autofocuses on the FX (full-frame sensor) bodies and Nikon 7000-series camera bodies.

As I've said in the past, I must have an exceptional copy of the Voigt 58 (with the 58 filter). The second one I bought was not as sharp at all (the 52 filter design, no idea if the new design played any role) to the point that I returned it. Because in my tests, the sharpness (at f/4) of my copy was a hair below the Zeiss 50/1.4 and equal to Zeiss 50/2.0. So I doubt it's less sharp than the Nikon 58. Who shoots at 1.4 anyway... I still have those test raw files. As far as the 24 1.8 it's crazy sharp and well corrected, very nice, but the Zeiss 25/2.0 (not the 2.8 which renders boring) is in a different much higher world in dimensional rendering, no comparison. Of the 50s I liked the Nikon 1.8D.

@rydaug79

6 жыл бұрын

The 50 1.8D has some of the worst bokeh I have ever seen. other than that its great.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

the 50mm 1.8D is cheap as dirt , its only $90 used :P heeheh

@CameraMystique

6 жыл бұрын

Ryan: yes, though I planned to use it only for general tourist photography at around f8 etc and I did use it for high school volleyball. I wouldn't use it for "bokeh". It's small, discrete, cheap!

@-Pol-

6 жыл бұрын

The 1.8D's not as small, cheap and discreet as the 1.8 AIS pancake! Mine slips into a side pocket, inside a masking tape roll and gets brought out for low light/bokeh. I don't know how it compares for image quality however?

Actually, the 50 1.4 doesn't have composite elements, the 1.8 does though. The 50 1.4 also has a true ring SWM. Depending on the type of chisel, a wood worker's chisel is probably sharper then most straight razors.

@Marshallchandra

5 жыл бұрын

Is the 50mm 1.4 ais also bad?

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

No, the 50mm 1.4 AIS is one he recommends in another video.@@Marshallchandra

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

I think he also mistakenly said the "pancake" 35mm 1.8, when I assume he was thinking of the 50mm 1.8 (AI/AIS/Series-E) or the 45mm 2.8 pancake lens. (Starting at 6:26 on the video.)@@YannickKhong

@PJ-om2wq

10 ай бұрын

What about the 50mm 1.4 D ?

Insightful insights. Also- his voice has definite John Lovitz vibes!

I use my 35mm 1.8g DX on my full frame D700. Nice! 😏

@blizzbee

2 жыл бұрын

😏

You want to talk about uuuuuuuuge front element, dude, the 800mm 5.6 Ai-s front element is 5 3/5 in diameter. It's dreamy.

What about a 24mm 1.4 for 999,- Occasion? worth it?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

damn thats cheap, good shape? loove the lens. :)

Hey Ken, i am really stuck on a good 105mm for my nikon camera. I want one with aperture 1.4 or 1.8 because of the depth of field but it needs to be autofocus. Can you reccomend me one please? Also am looking for a 85mm 1.4 autofocus for my Nikon? Money doesn't matter to me i just need a good quality lens. Thanks

@blueskies4951

5 жыл бұрын

In one of his later videos, he does recommend the D-version of the 85mm 1.4, and the G-series 85mm 1.8. He highly recommends the D-version or non-D version of the 105mm f/2 DC (defocus control) lens. Or, you may want to look at getting the 180mm 2.8D--another lens recommended by Ken. With the longer focal length lens, background clutter is reduced.

Love the video - Funny, out of all the Nikon f/1.4 primes, the one I love is one you hate. The 28/1.4E. I believe it's the best Nikon 1.4 prime I've used. Sony FE primes ruined me - really, they ruined Nikon, and it screams how bad Nikon F mount primes really are. I'm not a sharpness freak, but good lord, Nikon has been awful in this department. 24/1.4G - Sucks. Slow crappy AF. Rendering was decent. Sharpness was meh. 28/1.4E - Awesome. Love the rendering. The sharpness is more than decent. AF is quicker than I ever thought it would be. Literally the best AF-S prime I've used from Nikon. 35/1.4G - Meh. Decent AF. Sharpness? Average. After a year of use, it started sticking, and wouldn't AF properly. So really, it sucked. Sony's 35/1.4 FE is fantastically better than Nikon's. It's not even close. 50/1.4G - Sucks. Soft. Slow. Just shit in every way. Nikon should be embarrassed they even released this lens, much less the fact they charge $450 for this POS. 58/1.4G - Soft. renders beautiful bokeh, but...soft. AF. Slow. soft. you decide. 85/1.4G - Sucks. Slow as shit. But yay. It's contrasty and the bokeh is creamy. It's nano-coated to hell and back. 105/1.4 - Never used it, can't comment. I will say one thing - it's freaking huge... Thank GOD For the Nikon Z mount, so Nikon can start over from scratch. And when you hear people commenting/raving how amazing the Z primes are, it just illustrates how shitty Nikon primes truly have been (save for the 85mm f/1.8G and the 28mm f/1.4E. -- the two standout lenses in Nikon's prime line-up).

Nikon 20mm f/1.8 or Tamron 35mm f/1.4

The Canon 50mm f1.4 is also underwhelming. For most things I prefer the 50mm f1.8 STM to that lens. Your reviews are helpful, since I also use Nikon equipment. For wide lenses, I like the old D series a lot, since you can live without stabilization with wide lenses and I shoot from a tripod quite a bit. I even like some of the old auto lenses that are manual focus. The new stuff is sharper and technically better, but look at portraits side by side, and the "old-timey" look of the ancient glass has a certain something. Does your page have an easy way to list photographic content only? BTW, your video on lens cleaning was the best one I ever saw on that subject.

@eduardvanderhoeven4913

7 ай бұрын

😊 3:16

Didnt completely follow you on the 35mm. You consider the 1.4g lens as an 8.5, but 1.8g (fx version) as bad. But hmm, later you say 35mm is awesome (still fx). maybe you meant the 1.4?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

the 35mm 1.4 is awesome...the 35mm 1.8G FX sux.....the 35mm 1.8 DX is a great little cheapo lens.

@frankwoodbery2473

6 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis - thx ken

@rachelg7371

6 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis thank you for clarifying that. I was a bit confused also when listening to what you said about the 35.

@rachelg7371

6 жыл бұрын

Frank Woodbery thank you for asking. I heard the same and was going to ask if no one else did.

@frankwoodbery2473

6 жыл бұрын

You are welcome. I replayed that part a couple times and I couldn't figure out what Ken was saying. Of course, there's always the Tamron 35 1.8 and the Sigma 35 1.4 (God forbid!)

If u had so much lenses give me one Af-s lens 😉

Sometimes when a person runs out of purposeful things to say they should just shut up!

I hear the 58mm has severe focusing accuracy issues.

THANKYOU.....

What about the 50mm f/1.8 compared to the f/1.4?

No love for the Sigma Art lenses Ken ?

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

i never discuss that stuff for good reason

@-Pol-

6 жыл бұрын

Sigma ARSE lenses!

i thought you hated the 58mm... at any price. thought you said that in the past.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

the Voigt crushes it, i said that in this video and the past. ......i hate its price/value..... its obnoxiously overpriced, i found one for a steal at $950.....buuuuut, it costs a lot more than that new of course. in AUTOFOCUS 55~58 its the best choice. what else in AF would i replace it with?

@rydaug79

6 жыл бұрын

it has no business being that expensive. The 50G isn't that much worse.

@rydaug79

6 жыл бұрын

and the 58mm has circles within circles inside of its bokeh balls which i think is bad.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

50mm 1.4G with plastic composite elements :P chinnnaaaaaa hehehehe. yes, for 3X the price its not a great value, this is true indeed.

@rydaug79

6 жыл бұрын

Yannick Khong 2 years ago when I bought my camera off of eBay the 50mm 1.4 G came with it and I asked Ken if I should sell it. He said I shouldn't because "it's the cats ass"

is 650$ good price for used 24mm 1.4g? thank you.

@jamesjackson4264

3 жыл бұрын

Yes.

ahh, another lens video

What do you think of the Nikon 50MM 1.4D?

The 85 1.4G is a superb lens. A joy to use, great image, great bokeh, great colors...... I hate the 50 1.4 too.

The Yoda of Lenses...

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

more like the Jaba of lenses, right

@bradena.1194

6 жыл бұрын

I call him 'Obi-Wan-KEN-Obi'

@MrCochise71

6 жыл бұрын

Hamish A. 😂 Good one

Just took delivery of a 55 1.2 ai from Japan for $140.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

cheaaaaaaap!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Make a god damn museum!!! XD

"Huuge lens syndrom" - I know what are You talking about... ;)

A little surpsing some of your comments but I have never used them. Do a test on old manual 50mm f1.4 lenses. What you mention about michaelangelo was also surprising but sort of makes sense. Did you not recommend the 50mm f1.4 ais lens? Maybe I'm wrong

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

i have ALL the old 50mm lenses..... several copies of same too ROFL 50mm 1.4D AF is the best value at about $100 used

At least you admitted that the 105 takes unique images.

But, if you don't have a 50 1.4D, you will need to buy Photoshop in order to get that nice blue dot in the middle of your bright shots.

Loool u want some ice cream

Looks like I'm selling I'm 85mm 1.4....thanks a bunch.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

nooo why do that? i dont tell anyone to sell their stuff

@solosoulet

4 жыл бұрын

@@kathodosdotcom Are we talkding about the G or D version?

Can u adopt me plz

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

ehhehehe, U might be too old

Don't sit to close to the fire

wow 400 plus lenses....

@kathodosdotcom

5 жыл бұрын

over 530

@justincase12112

5 жыл бұрын

@@kathodosdotcom i am looking for option on Nikon d850 for 35 mm focal length. Confused between Nikon 35 1.8 FX vs Sigma Art 35 1.4. i have Tamron 24-70 2.8 VC but i like wide view with out of focus rendering.

You are failing to remember that the 24 f/1.4 has been around for a lot longer than the 1.8 version. I have the 24 f/1.4 and it is far and away my most used and most favored lens + focal length. If the f/1.8 versions had been around when I got that lens, well, then we'd have something to talk about. When Nikon started unveiling these made in China f/1.8s, I did consider selling off all my kit ... I could seriously sell two lenses and that would fund the entire 1.8 lineup. Yes, they are lighter weight. Yes, very nice optically. But give up my big guns? NEVER. I did pick up the 20 f/1.8 because it got such great reviews. Also I got it to console myself when I sold my 14-24 f/2.8. But it does feel like it would shatter into a million shards if I dropped it. On the other hand, I could use my 24 as a weapon.

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

which one? the 24mm 1.4D or G series? :) hugs Susan :)

@SusanSlattery

6 жыл бұрын

My kit is an even mix of G and D. I have a thing for the D series, but my older lenses are my G series: 24, 50, 85, 105 micro. D series: 135, 35, 200 micro, 60 micro. The 20 f/1.8G. Then of course that big zoom: 200-500. In order of purchase: 105 f/2.8G micro--the lone survivor of my DX kit, 50 f/1.4G purchased to prevent me from getting the 24-70 f/2.8G, but then I ended up getting it anyway to complete the trinity. 24 f/1.4G purchased shortly after it was introduced, thus spelling doom for my trinity, all gone now; 85 f/1.4G. And for a while, that was it. I lugged around a D700, the 24, 50 and 85. Left the 105 at home. Then let's see. I got a Df (oh, I sold that a few months ago) and got the 60D with a rubber hood because, AQUARIUMS. Then I sold my 24-70 to buy the 135 DC. Then I sold my 14-24 to put money toward a D5. Then I missed it so I got the 20 f/1.8. Then I got the D5. Then I got the 200-500. Then I got the 200 micro, which has been on my wishlist for about 100 years. D700 still with me. Not worth it to sell. I call it my legend camera. Heh. AND THEN: angst over 35... I should get the 1.8, but I have a 1.4 lineup, in the end, the D won. So gosh darn cute and so light, and frankly, I dig the colors from it.

@SusanSlattery

6 жыл бұрын

And also my 35 and my 60 D series have character. I picked up the 60 on eBay, so uninterested was I in that macro length. But then I found myself in aquariums googling on my phone, "what's the best focal length for aquariums?" I think I paid $230 for it. Of course the 35 D was also a cheapie. Looks like a pimple on the D5.

Ken is absolutely correct about the 50 1.4 lenses... they all shoot soft compared to the 1.8 models... both G and D series.

Sucks you don’t like the new nikon cameras because I want to know what are the best old lenses to adapt to a z7ii and nobody else has all the lenses you do! No that video can never be made. :/

You don't have any money Ken cos you have it all spent on lenses, camera bodies & lighting! 😂 If you sold them all you be a millionaire 🤤

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

nahhhhhh

So, in short .... avoid many of Nikon's f1.4 primes ! ( not that I disagree ).

@kathodosdotcom

6 жыл бұрын

some of em , yes....the 24 1.4 is awesome, the 35 1.4 is great too BOTH are way overpriced

@craigjohnchronicles2504

3 жыл бұрын

I say get the 28/1.4E, and skip the 24/1.4 and the 35/1.4.

Agreed the 50mm AF-S f1.4 G is horrible, dull, fuzzy.

Lol, I LURVE the 50 mm 1.4 lens for its price. Great portrait lens on DX.