I wonder how many more surprises will appear in exploring the human timeline. A lot I think.

@southerneruk

10 ай бұрын

I expect so, it will be mainly in Eastern Asia I think

@dantyler6907

10 ай бұрын

I wonder how many times folks have said the exact SAME thing, decade after decade...

@jonslagill8864

10 ай бұрын

NONE so far. This is a scam. They all turn out to be lies.

@southerneruk

10 ай бұрын

@@jonslagill8864 Your DNA says differently

@larryc1616

10 ай бұрын

Why doesn't religion explain any of this? 🤔

I always appreciate your concise assessment of new discoveries. I'm always open to welcoming more relatives of our modern makeup. Still many potential ghost lineages to account for.

@arrggghhAddison-be3py

10 ай бұрын

Did you mean word: correlatives? Keep on tRukken Kayleigh>>

I ❤ human evolution and uncovering our ancestors. Fascinating!

You're my go-to anthropological source. Thanks, Kayleigh, for the work you put into this channel.

This is the kind of history that amazes me. So cool.

This is amazing! It shows that more humans spread out sooner than we knew! It’s like finding out you have a half-sibling or cousin you never knew!

@ColemanCanna

10 ай бұрын

i am certain we will learn far more about the true travels of pre humans an early humans.

@chucklesthered2338

10 ай бұрын

These are not new. We know them as Homo-communists.

@charlesflinnill978

10 ай бұрын

She sure is amazing!

What is amazing to me is that we exist at all. It would seem the more we discover the less we know but it's the journey of understanding our world that I care about. Thanks Kayleigh!

"Dig We Must" Thank you Kayleigh keep up the amazing work. M&T

Fascinating, as always. It's almost mind blowing to think of how much we don't know, and all the possibilities. And, incredible to think of how complex the process of evolution is, as well as how widely spread the migration of Human ancestors has turned out to be.

Another great video Kayleigh ,thanks for keeping us informed on these discoveries.

Fascinating . . . Danke you . . 👍👍

Super interesting, Kay! Thanks for doing so much research to provide us with this information :)

To me the discovery of a new Human Species tops everything 🤯 Thankyou for presenting the findings to us so brilliantly

Thanks again Kayleigh for a wonderful and exciting video. I don't have any formal qualifications in science or archeology. But i am truly fascinated by this topic. I am learning about the deep history of our planet and humanity in your videos. Thank you for making these videos understandable and interesting for people like me. Please keep up the great work. You are educating a new generation of people about the ancient past. Your work is important.

Another amazing presentation. I love the passion about these videos that you put into them. It's incredibly engaging.

I started collecting artifacts from very rural farmland areas north of Beijing years ago, which included many (many) giant jade skulls, hollowed out weighing between 100-200lbs. The shape was not Homo Sapien - massive, thick and pronounced mandible, huge occipital lobes, and slightly elongated skull. I believe most were carved by the Hongshan culture due to the iconography set in high relief on top of each (pig dragon, C dragon, cicada, bi, turtle shell, bird of prey, etc). I originally matched them to Denisovan but perhaps they are instead this newly discovered species. What an amazing little known world we live in. And yes, I still have them all in safe storage. 😀

@walterblanc9708

10 ай бұрын

Could you post some photos of them please?

@LostHongshan

10 ай бұрын

@@walterblanc9708 What’s the best way to do so without having to create a YT video?

@ZDKzap

10 ай бұрын

Please consider donating them to your nearest anthropologist or museum

@LostHongshan

10 ай бұрын

@@ZDKzap Right, so they can be archived and hidden Smithsonian style? I don’t think so. I’ll build and open my own museum before I do that. I already trademarked the name and logo.

@undasea

9 ай бұрын

"Collecting artifacts"? Is that your way of saying "looting" or do you just buy them from looters? What right do you have to keep those in "safe storage" rather than handing them over to experts that can study and preserve them for ALL people, but specifically the people of the areas you stole them from?

I always enjoy these new fossil hominin discoveries, each one just destroying my previous misconceptions about our origins. It all started with Homo floresiensis for me!

@artomies1972

10 ай бұрын

Sadly, all the Homos died out. Only the straights survived. Still, very interesting.

@claudiaxander

10 ай бұрын

@@artomies1972 How old are you?

@claudiaxander

10 ай бұрын

Have I said something terribly immature? You have.

There are very many pieces out there we have not found yet its a much more complex story than we have yet imagined :)

Great report Keyliegh! Thank you 😁

This is awesome. I had not heard about this yet. Maybe one of those ghost ancestors in our dna.

Fascinating information and great presentation. Subbed!

As a common man and based on previous findings, Chinese are well-known to plant such so called fossils, so I would rather take this with a pinch of salt.

@romanpaladino

10 ай бұрын

They've done it with dinosaur fossils as well.

Thanks for your work Kaylee, and for some reason even though I'm so subed and watch your videos as soon as I find out that you've released a new one, still don't get notifications.

solid good stuff as always i cant wait to see your videos. salute , you save youtube's life.

It is also important to keep in mind that evolution is continuous and there will be intermediate forms that exist between decribed species or potentially hybrids. The full hominid evolutionary tree is likely to be much more complex than our current understanding.

Great video, Kayleigh ...ty Kayleigh.

Another step on the way to modern humans. Great video Kaleigh.

There is still so much to learn about the human time line. We've only scratched the surface, so to speak.

i love this channel! keep up the great work please! big love to all people :)

A lot has happened in the field of genes in the past year. Can you please tell us about the work with the different human species so far. 👍👍 Carsten Sverige

Thanks Kayleigh.

Interesting with a little humour as always, nice job Kayleigh ✌️❤️🇬🇧😊

Very interesting video as usual ,love it

This new species could have evolved completely independently of us. Similar evolutionary results could have happened in many places. We don't have to be related.

AMAZING. Thank you. Stay curious

As always a very interesting presentation.

What a wonderfully informative channel.

I love how you present all this your case.

History is a living science. We will always be rewriting history books. This is a good thing. I only ask scholars, historians and archeologists keep an open mind.

Hi Kayleigh, I'm enjoying your videos immensely and absolutely agree with the emphasis on hard evidence for claims usual and unusual in Archaeology and other of the sciences. There is yet another level of skepticism to keep in mind and that is that sometimes politics skews the interpretation set forth about the nature (uniqueness for instance) of a discovery. This has been the case for instance, in Japanese archaeology concerning its connection with Korea. Best to you and your cat! Jesse

Thanks!

Hello, our Angel of the fossils! Thanks for all your effort! And what you do!

Gonna be intresting 👍

Somewhat off topic, but it sometimes breaks my heart to think how many potential ground breaking fossils in China we might have lost, simply because they were eaten as traditional medicine.

i read up on a bit of this last month. This is so exciting.

I heard from this a couple of weeks ago, but couldn’t believe it until a trusted source talked about it aka Kayleigh 🎉

@vulpesvulpes5177

10 ай бұрын

Exactly! Hard to understand how a major regional war, presidential indictments and an entire island in flames could eclipse this in the main stream news cycle. What am I saying….?! Fox out

This might be a stupid question but what do you think about "out of Asia"? Could it be that modern homo sapiens developed out of these newly found hominis mixing with other species? I don't think so but I'd like to hear your take on this.

Not surprised at all. The many undiscovered or unexplored part of this vast planet has many secrets, timelines, and histories yet to be discovered. The human timeline alone cannot be limited in to just one point of origin. As always, another great episode. Thank you!

I keep thinking/hoping we find someone intermediate between sapiens and other earlier hominids or maybe someone in-between different hominids. I wonder if this is one of these cases.

Thanks for the great video. Have you ever done a video on the Osirion Temple located at one end of Seti's Temple? If not, it might be interesting. 🙂

Tak!

@HistoryWithKayleigh

10 ай бұрын

😁

Linda ❤ I love you and your posts 🇧🇷

Very interesting, will be keeping my eye out for more info on HLD-6, Have unearthed anything on Peking Man

@HistorywithKayleigh >>> Great video...👍

There is some speculation that _H. longi_ may be Denisovans.

So cool

How much of our human history was lost beneath three gorges reservoir?

I imagine that when the newcomers entered into the chinless area there were probably some punches thrown, and then the victors walked away with their chins held high.

@squidsquid-jy4yx

10 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, that is a strong possibility.

Do you speak Mandarin? Your annunciation sounds precise

@HistoryWithKayleigh

10 ай бұрын

Haha I dont

Kayleigh rules! I hadn't heard about this, thanks for the video.

Just here to say morphological similarities might result convergent evolution, rather than due to a common ancestor. Great video! Xoxo

Toppie weer 👍😉

I think archeology of the Pleistocene era is still in its infancy in China and India ... we have very few fossils from those times. Our theories will change as more discoveries are made.

@peekaboopeekaboo1165

9 ай бұрын

What about fossils of "Peking Man" ... supposedly discarded by the Japanese somewhere in China.

One thing you mentioned that interests me was describing the 12 to 13 year old as a child. by our standard you are correct but allowing for life expectancy and the fact that at that age they were probably already mating and producing off spring , would it not be according to the time period better to call them young adults at that age in that time.

I wish I had history teacher's who presented the subject anywhere near as well as you. when I was in school. I'm sure I would never have cut class if you were teaching.

@charlesflinnill978

10 ай бұрын

You got that right!

All I know is that prehistoric Earthlings seem to have done an insane amount of walking. Or there is no common ancestor and evolution occurred in several distinctly different areas on the Planet following similar lines of development and taking similar amounts of time. Roughly, 300,000 years is 12,000 generations. I imagine you could get a bit of evolution accomplished in that time. Say hi to your sister.

@michaelfritts6249

10 ай бұрын

Yes! It's kinda funny that some assume that the "big arrows" showing migration patterns mean "One Way".. The ebb and flow of hominids and the inevitable interbreeding that resulted in modern Homo Sapiens was a group project.. the most dominant DNA in our current version was developed Africa.. As far as mixing? An Akita mixed with a Labrador Retriever is still a dog..

Unless I missed it being accounted for somewhere, there's still an unidentified population showing up in the SE Asian gene pool alongside the two separate Denisovan contributions. It's much later date than what's under discussion here but Denisovans survived down to 30kybp and potentially as late as 15kybp, so it's really not a stretch to suggest that this unidentified group, or a population directly descended from them, may have survived quite late.

2:55 !Yes! That

Do we know what she looked like? The skull of the teenage girl is mostly intact. Thanks for another great show. 🙂

Wow what a jackpot

This was fun and makes me little more bookwise after watching 🦖🦕

I still wonder why we haven't found more denisovan specimens.

Hello Kayleigh, are there any similarities between the bone, skulls and processed items of these Pleistocene hominins with those of the pre-Clovis Pleistocene hominins from the NW American region ? There were periods of a land or ice-bridge from Siberia to Alaska creating a potential migration route for hominins and their prey-animals. Are there any coincidences or correlations ? Just wondering what you and others may have to say about this possibility ?

I was hoping it was a denisovan. wanted more dna from them.

@jonwashburn7999

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for the info. @@tomhalla426

There are lots we have yet to learn.

I hope it is verified as a new species, as such is what i was already expecting to happen, eventually. History is clearly not as linear as many want to believe, and any blatant evidence about that, helps remove that misconception.

It seems to me like we’re being generous with naming new hominid species because of morphological differences as compared to other animals. As soon as a specimen shows traits that are outside the currently existing range, we say it’s a different species whereas for animals these are considered to simply be earlier traits of the chronospecies that have vanished. Isn’t there a possibility that old traits which are no longer expressed are simply dormant in our genes because not selected for recently and may yet reemerge if conditions change? All I’m saying is that we may end up with half a dozen or more species of homo that were all capable of interbreeding 50,000 years ago and each likely lasting less than 500k years whereas leopards for example are considered to have been around for at least 2M years and have had rather different morphologies in the past throughout their vast range, with other members of their genus being very different from them and not generally being able to produce reproductively viable offspring. Seems like Neanderthals, Antecessor, Heidelbergensis, Denisovans, Erectus/Ergaster and possibly others should be absorbed into Sapiens as a chronospecies while probably remaining distinct subspecies as a frame of reference. I think in the case of Floresiensis a species distinction is warranted simply because of the size difference making reproduction difficult/unlikely, as well it may have descended from a pre Erectus wave.

is there a minimum amount of potential members before a new species can be declared? One alone could just be a mutation or deformity of some kind.

You should come to Kentucky… I’ve discovered a few new species of human, and they are still alive!

@rocroc

10 ай бұрын

I lived in Kentucky for 12 years. It was filled with some very nice people. Similar to the people I've known in the 40 other states and 6 foreign countries I am most familiar with.

@jeremywhittington7605

10 ай бұрын

@@rocroc I know exactly what you mean… I’ve found that people around the world really aren’t as different as it seems

cool a new species could you maybe speculate on where this current species is headed given the current "weather" just for fun, as we explore our past extensively would you lend your expertise to the future maybe ?

This is a huge new discovery. Gonna rewrite a LOT of history if corroborated

There are examples of modern humans with a "weak" jawline or a receding chin. While some are the result of diet others are congenital (linked to conditions like Downs syndrome, Pierre Robin syndrome or Treacher Collins syndrome). Is it possible that this mandible is an early expression of one of these conditions?

@Gizathecat2

10 ай бұрын

Many of the “unmixed” indigenous Australian people present with receding chins

❤ thank you u r beautiful and wise❤

It is important that the finds and interpretations are examined and peer reviewed by the greater international Paleoanthropological community and not completely accepted solely from the Chinese scientific community which can not be separated from the Chinese political propaganda machine. China has an agenda based on a China-centric view in which the Chinese assert politics into every facet of Chinese science and history. They have insisted that the Chinese evolved independently from the rest of the Homo sapiens for over a century now from the first 'Peking-man' discoveries until present.

Something as complex and polymorphic as human language is not likely to have evolved across only three or four successive species. It must have needed maybe eight or ten, aiming short. But fossils are extremely rare. Most likely, we'll miss two or three of such species, at least, simply because they left no fossils.

It seems to be becomming pretty self evident, that the simple "Out of Africa" hypothesis of human evolution is not the whole story, and that some form of the "Multi Regional" hypothesis of human evolution is closer to the truth of what is going on. Numerous hominids branched, and semi speciated, while adapting to different situations over millennia and then re -interbred much later. This happened again and again in different admixture events, creating the variations we see in Hominid populations, including modern humans.

@romanpaladino

10 ай бұрын

Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa and spread from there. That hasn't changed.

Another one? What are we up to now, thousands? There is something big missing from the idea of so many different human ancestors. It's almost like we should have seen a few different human ancestors in our recorded history.

Well, nobody will take out of my mind that Asia has much, much more to reveal us about our ancient past. I.M.H.O. it's not only Africa...

Very cool. Remember that genes mysteriously switch on or switch off. There may he a common gene that switched on in China before it did in Out of Africa homo sapiens.

👍

I have to say I take exception to the finding or historical / pre-historical relics, animal, vegetable, or mineral items and having them referred to as "new". I literally saw one once that said "new dinosaur, lived 70,000,000 years ago." Newsflash, 70 million years ago is NOT new.

@HistoryWithKayleigh

10 ай бұрын

Newly discovered kinda makes it new in some regard

I wish they found atleast one proper fossil in all of india. Indian human fossil record is just terrible

does it explain anything about geert wilder's overcomb? Thats surely a missing link one of them , they must compare xrays.

Hmm I’d like to know more

Some MSM reports mentioned more similarity with Denisovians than Sapiens, without explaining how that was deduced, I thought the Denisovian bones known amounted to very little? So not sure how they worked it out?

@NeilEvans-xq8ik

10 ай бұрын

They used one of the three 'pinky' finger bones to sequence the genome. That's all they needed. I don't think they have any bones they can ID with any certainty. It's all genetic. I think!

hi, Kaylee! i think we've just scratched the surface of human evolution....the time span is huge, no telling how many archaic branches there are.....it seems obvious to me that there were many "out of Africa" episodes.....and some isolated evolutionary episodes, also.....when groups of animals, of any kind, are separated for long periods, the limited gene pool causes certain traits to be different.....no chin is quite archaic, yes? yes, i have a chin....guess i'm H Sapiens, no brow ridge.....not much Neanderthal......big chin, tho......i think what's important is that the differences in humans today, have deep roots in human evolution.....sort of a smorgasbord of many varieties of the same species.....the spice of life, one might say....pretty boring without it interesting info, Klee.....thank you, for all your effort.....tip a cider for me, please😋

@barrywalser2384

10 ай бұрын

Hiyah Floyd! It was good to see you in the chat. I’m the same, got a lot of chin. Ha!

@floydriebe4755

10 ай бұрын

@@barrywalser2384 hey, Barry! a fellow H Sapiens! i think it'd be kinda weird, having no chin......when my son, Drew, was little, his chin and forehead saved his nose when he'd fall down....don't think he ever got a bloody nose😅.....my own schnoz got bloodied often.....sticks out like a sore thumb.....anyhoo, yeah, made Kayleigh's premiere by the skin of my teeth.....gotta keep a closer eye out....later, dude

@barrywalser2384

10 ай бұрын

@@floydriebe4755 You made it in plenty of time. 👍🏼 Stay lucky man!

@vulpesvulpes5177

10 ай бұрын

Hello Floyd. You touch on a good point. Chins. What good are they? Or brow ridges for that matter. Anthropologists look for observable differences. Trying to sort people out. Typically occidentals have big noses. Orientals don’t. Then physiologists come along and try to deduce why one nose predominates in a particular area. Big noses warm air coming in in cold climates. Ok that works. What about small noses? Sometimes it’s hard to explain exactly why that 59 Chevy had those big rocket ship fins. Or exactly why those Filipinas have cute little button noses. Now lately chins and brow ridges have been considered. Not “investigated” exactly. More philosophised about. By the structural physiology types. Anthropologists look at chins and brows the way car buffs look at fins or tail lights. A way to tell one model or year from another. Those tail fins on the late 50’s-early 60’s buggy’s did not DO anything after all. But chins? Brows? Maybe they did? Maybe they are more than an indication of our model year. Brow ridges and sagittal crests have always been accredited to similar functions that we see later on medieval armour. To keep from having your skull based in. But the physiologists now think that these bony protrusions are best explained as attachment points for muscle groups. This makes our chin a bit more than fins on the back fenders. Computer models and simulations suggest that our kin who lacked a chin could get a better bite on a large flat surface. Like the leg of a mastodon. And muscles anchored all the way up on the top of the face, attached at the jaw, made that one hell of a bite. While smaller muscles attached from the cheek bones to the chin made for a more precise bite nibbling at the recesses. This leads to speculation. That the use of tools to cut meat from the bone led to a chin so as to nibble out the last little bite. Or. That the chin evolved in order to articulate speech so that we could hunt cooperatively, better. So. Anatomical differences that may possibly reflect other changes we had already made, OR may have actually been responsible for those changes. Which came first, the chicken or the egg. Which came first, speech or the chin. But testing these things, definitively, is hard. Models only work up to a point, despite what “they” tell you. So is the chin that big a deal? Is a man without a prominent chin still a man? Is a car without fins still a car? What is the “best” color for a car. Make. Model. Does any of that matter? As long as it goes from point a to point b? Or is it really just there to pick up girls? When you distill it all down that’s what we all are doing here with Kayleigh. Trying to philosophically answer some basic questions about who, why, and what we really are. That’s how I see it. I’ve wagged my chin enough. Fox out

@floydriebe4755

10 ай бұрын

@@vulpesvulpes5177 hiya, Fox! dang! saw you'd replied and went to peruse your words of wisdom and wisecracks....holy cow! darn near a dissertation! sssooo, i settled down and got to reading....i must say, you certainly have a lot of info on a lot of diverse subjects.....where do you find room for all of that? in that small vulpes brain?.......just yankin' yer chain, brer Fox all that aside, yes, why do we have brow ridges and chins.....certainly for some reason....or, are they just decoration? muscle attachment, sure, but why these particular forms.....the bite angle is interesting.... never really thot of it that way.....big nose goes both ways, tho.....Africans and Aborigines have large noses, also.....helps to release body heat.....but, many features are just manifestations of the dominate genome? i'm speculating, here.....no expert, am i...... anyway, i like the old '50's and '60's cars way more than the new stuff.....really appreciate the fins and such......1st car was a '56 Chevy....mild fins but, still......gas cap was hidden behind the left tail light.....so cool! well, i tried to make mine a dissertation, too....didn't quite make it but, oh well.....i do what i can.... i, too, have wagged my chin enough, so adios, aurevoir, arivaderci, ciao, auf wiedersehn, b'Bye 'nuff said

that two hominin species share a trait doesn't necessarily mean they have a common ancestor. It could also be parallel evolution. For instance the mandibles of homo sapiens are heavily influenced by cooking. Should homo erectus in China been able to cook it would make sense if they developed similar adaptions independently.

I think this discovery is crazy!

So I have always wondered about the length of time each branch of the family tree is and how it is determined ??? Please??

Wonder what happened to them 🙏