Around 2005 I was convicted of Domestic violence Misdemeanor battery. In California it was only a 10 year band, but I fell into the Lautenberg amendment and was issued a federal lifetime ban. After watching this channel I called a local gun rights attorney and he told me I should be good in my case, but there’s a couple caveats to the domestic battery misdemeanor. It has to be a girlfriend, to qualify for this change in the federal ban. A charge involving a current or former spouse or mother of child disqualifies from the laughtenburg amendment change . And also no more than one of these charges . I went to buy a gun , we’ll see what happens . I check back and give you guys an update on what happens .

Lauren Boerbert, the assembly woman from Colorado is trying to repeal the Lautenberg Act.

I’ve watched so many videos on the new form, and you are the only person mentioning the revision to the Lautenburg Amendment. Thanks!

In Texas this gives me my rights back. I did this on my channel I have several people in contacts with lawyers are to confirm but yes anyone who is in a state that gives rights back you can in fact own a fire arm

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Texas is the BEST.

@Drizo41

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition amen

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

There's a clause in it that says it isn't retro active.. I don't like this gvn bill.

@Drizo41

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition ya seems to me like that will fall on court very very quickly because your changing a law and making it different just because of a time stamp and no difference. Ya that shit is gonna fall we are taking that shit down

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

It’s gives a slap on the hand to brand new and future men who catch the charge but, still punishes the people who have paid their debt to society and that’s a double standard and then some.

A revision to this amendment should apply to everyone, not just for certain classes.

@thedefensecoalition

Ай бұрын

I agree. An offender who has a conviction from 10 years ago is banned, but someone can go out and catch that same charge tomm and only lose rights for five years. Makes no sense.

Under the Bruen Decision, we should be able to quit filling out ATF 4473 Forms when buying a gun from a dealer. When is this going to happen ?

Thank you such been searching for days for something straight forward in language I understand

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Glad I can help

I love your channel BROTHER...THANKS

So if it isn't retroactive why is it being perceived that it is and why would you have to wait 5 years if this is the first and only time that you've had a DV misdemeanor which is over 20 years ago?

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

I don't see where it would be perceived as being retroactive, but I could definitely see where a person may think that it is or could be. So basically, People with old DV charges are stuck with the lifetime ban until this amendment is struck down in the Supreme Court, while new DV offenders can offend and only get a 5 year ban. Doesn't make sense to me either, but hey!

@np4057

5 ай бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition I believe you’re incorrect about the 5 year limitation not applying to old charges. If you actually read the bill it says the amendments made in subsection A (closing dating partner loophole) are not retroactive. The part about the 5 year ban is in subsection C and actually changes the existing code. It applies to all charges past and present according to the actual text of the bill. Also only applies to dating relationships no exemption for spouses or child’s parents etc

Omg I love Texas ❤️❤️❤️

Can you provide the links you indicated in your video. I am trying to find your revision information regarding the Lautenberg amendment and cannot locate it. Thank you in advance

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Done! Check the description it should be there. Thank you brother!

@martinrodriguez6662

Жыл бұрын

Thank you !

Why haven't there been more informed videos like this one addressing the revised wording?? Thank you for this video. Are there any more updates on misdemeanor DV cases on gun rights restorations because of this revised form?

@thedefensecoalition

5 ай бұрын

I have not heard anything recent as far as DV cases. The most I have heard about is the Rahimi case but never anything else.

Is this revision only for people in the military I spoke to a lawyer and that's what they told me.

@thedefensecoalition

22 күн бұрын

No. It applies to all who catch this conviction from a dating relationship

I have not been able to find anything about the Lautenberg amendment that backs up what you are saying. How can I get the actual amendment that you are reading to use?

@thedefensecoalition

7 ай бұрын

Gotta look for it online in plain text.

@KellySmith-gt5pi

6 ай бұрын

Order the form frim the ATF and what he read to you is in the instructions attached to the new 4473 form....its real...

I was arrested in California 1998 for Dv. What does this mean for me? Thanks.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Nothing because the bill isn’t retroactive. We’ll have to wait until the Supreme Court overturns this amendment as unconstitutional, which it is. However, you do have defense alternatives…

Va state police denied my gun purchase for a domestic violence conviction from 1999@ The Defence Coalition

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Yea, they'll do that over a domestic. Until this Lautenberg Amendment is turned over in the supreme court, they'll keep doing this to people. In Virginia, you're ok to carry black powder antique firearms. I can send you more info on that if you'd like.

I believe you’re incorrect about the 5 year limitation not applying to old charges. If you actually read the bill it says the amendments made in subsection A (closing dating partner loophole) are not retroactive. The part about the 5 year ban is in subsection C and actually changes the existing code. According to the text of the bill it applies to both past and present charges for the 5 year exemption I’ve talked to a few lawyers about this myself too. Be aware this exemption only applies to dating relationships. If it happened against a spouse, living partner, or child’s parent you are SOL regardless of past present or future charges this won’t help you.

WELL DOES THIS INCLUDE DV OVER 5 YRS FOR EVERYONE UNDER LAUTENBERG OR JUST BOY FRIEND/ GIRL FRIEND CONVICTIONS

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Means misdemeanor dv cases that happen going forward since it’s not retroactive.

Brother I do blackpowder for self defense in Texas on KZread we could link up and do some stuff together brother. Good information.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

Sounds excellent. Congratulations to you! I’m gonna come back and touch on a few key points soon… I just had to get it out there because I was literally looking into the Lautenberg amendment the other night

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

I'm in

@Drizo41

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition sweet brother

@Drizo41

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition yes I did a video on this. I have several people from across the country getting with lawyers right now and should have an answer at the end of the week to make it stamped in stone. This is amazing news for people in my situation.

Strange that the Lautenberg Amendment was retroactively applied but the Safer Communities Act wasn't.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

It’s odd because new offenders will get their 2A rights back after 5 years. Meanwhile, offenders that have been clean for twenty years are treated worse than a felon.

@atomic4116

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition It's a double standard and unconstitutional. 922(g)(9) will be knocked down in no time. No way this unconstitutional law will stand the Bruen test.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

@@atomic4116 agreed! I’d like to see it make its way to the Supreme Court because it’s a misdemeanor with a lifetime ban. Should be fun.

I’m a felon for trafficking marijuana. Really wish they would change that so I could own a firearm. Most victimless crime ever.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

I think you may be in the clear. it's non-violent. Check with a lawyer in your area. You may be good!

@tommyperdue1311

Жыл бұрын

Va state police denied my gun purchase for a domestic violence conviction from 1999

@caseylynch4001

Жыл бұрын

​@tommyperdue1311 well that answers that question.

So if it's been over 5 years and the sentence was completed we are able to carry our firearm?

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

No, Because the new bill is not retroactive. Only in states like Texas because Texas has laws like that.

@alfredobenavides8175

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition I live in Texas

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

@@alfredobenavides8175 You're good to go... Golden!

@alfredobenavides8175

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition for real 😳

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

@@alfredobenavides8175 statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.46.htm#46.04

I have a DV charge from 2020 I’m in Alabama will this give me my rights back?

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

5 years after conviction or completion of supervision according to the ATF. Consult with an attorney in your state to go over the language of the document just to be sure.

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

on the brighter side, you can carry black powder in Alabama...

@vikingshelm

Жыл бұрын

@@thedefensecoalition In Nevada, where my situation occurred, the only way to get guns back is a pardon. Period. I live in Missouri, but NV is holding me back.

@vikingshelm

Жыл бұрын

The 5 year thing is only for boyfriend/ girlfriend DATING situations It's a step in the right direction, but I kind of find it unfair overall. It should be 5 years for everyone, regardless.

@drakejones2095

Жыл бұрын

@@vikingshelm how would they know to see if that was only bf/gf lol

this dont change anything, bro has wishful thinking, changing a purchase form dont change the law........

@thedefensecoalition

Жыл бұрын

There’s a lot of sneaky gun control in there that changes a lot of things. Trust me. Compare the old and new 4473 forms.