Sign up for the Fiqh of Purification - muslimlighthouse.com

Prophet Mohammad (ﷺ) Said: Whoever guides someone to goodness will have a same reward like the one who did it.” (Sahih muslim:1893) Subhanallah Also copy & share with others

Jazak ALLAHU Khairan for your lnteresting videos 🤲 👍👍👍

Alhamdulillah.Thank you for making this lesson.I have been looking to increase my knowledge about purification for so long

Bro you look beatiful masha Allah.

What about the Fiqh of beard length according to majority of the scholars, and the authentic Hadith?

You said in one of ur videos That it’s important to follow a madhab but is it compulsory? I just consider myself a muslim.

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

Ok, you are a muslim. So are the muslims that follow a madhab. How do you know how to proceed in certain Situations of purification or prayer by just being a muslim?

@Fatima-mu8cb

24 күн бұрын

Me too

Brother I have a doubt about the beard a man can he trim his beard like you because i read a hadhees that’s saying trim the moustache and leave the beard that’s why I ask you don’t think can you reply me if don’t mind ?

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

There are different rulings depending on different understandings of these ahadith including other ahadith as well. For example the hanbali madhab which is considered the most strict, has following rulings. Shaving the beard or trimming the beard to the extent that it looks as if it is shaved, is haram. Growing it to the lenght of one fist, is mustahabb. And trimming the beard under one fist lenght but over the lenght of shaved, is makruuh.

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

No offense but what you did isnt really that good when it comes to the perspective of 3ilm in the religion. You said, you read a hadith. The first Problem is, the hadith was most likely not in arabic that you read. The second problem is, you dont know all other ahadith reagarding that topic so that you could come to a conclusion which encompasses all ahadith. Third problem is, a hadith can be ambiguous and therefore leads to different understandings of the hadith. The fourth problem is, we laymen are not qualified to evaluate a hadith, we have close to zero knowledge when it comes to the Shari3a. And even If you do that and we imagine you cane up with the right ruling, it is still sinfull for somone without knowledge to just pick a hadith or a verse and come up with his own ruling. Ok now, the ruling that you mentioned does exist and does have a valid justification, but If there is a valid disagreement because of something that isnt clear, you are then not authorized to say to the people that follow another ruling that they are doing something wrong, or even applying your ruling on the scolarly opinion that they follow

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Ustadh, I don’t wish to study any of your courses. But i would like to say - is there not more ‘izza and nobility in giving knowledge for free. Yes you may receive some monetary gain (and I’m not saying this is haram), but would your rank before Allah skyrocket if you just taught people for free. If you look at the ulema who were remembered in history you will notice their zuhd, so perhaps, if you have knowledge, then your test is to give this knowledge for free to people for your own benefit. Again, I’m not going to even use your course, but I say this so perhaps you might consider it for everyone else جزاك الله خيرا

@duawahabkhan

22 күн бұрын

There’s nothing wrong if he wants to make a living out of His Knowledge. Everyone does that. Doctors they play a very important role in our society but they don’t do surgeries for free. Even tho By doing that they would be saving thousands of lives but That’s how life is

@iymuslim

22 күн бұрын

@@duawahabkhan I don’t think you read my comment properly lol

@beepedude. I have another doubt, my doubt is that there are 2 not all-powerful gods, but together, they are strong enough to maintain the universe, these thoughts give me discomfort, I feel like they are right and that i founded the truth, polytheism, I feel like god is only eternal because of the draining life of other beings, he is not all powerful and that there are 2 weak gods, which make one powerful gods, please destroy my doubt, it gives me discomfort

@ayaan9094

17 күн бұрын

Even the big bang have a single explosion

Hmm nice, I only follow the Quran and Sunnah, but when there are things which I don't understand or there are difference of opinion, I follow that scholar who seems to have stronger evidence from Quran and sunnah and makes more sense. ✌

@rhyadmuslim

27 күн бұрын

You cannot follow Quran and Sunnah without a Madhab unless you’re a scholar that has masters the Islamic sciences

@ayangamer2664

27 күн бұрын

You are doing Tarjeeh? Are you a scholar?

@user-eo1xp7nl5v

27 күн бұрын

This is pure ignorance nothing else

@dustyzbrick9510

27 күн бұрын

We need to fix this idea. Everyone needs to research the dunning Kruger effect. It is the cause for ignorance like this.

@beepedude

26 күн бұрын

​@@Faraaz-we3ejwhat happened?

What law book needed when you have Quran? Can anyone or any book clarify law better than Quran? What does Surah 6:114-115 say? By the way, correct your Salam my dear. You will find the correct words in Surah 6:54. And remember any word change will make you a kafir because Surah 5:13 says so.

@ibrahimali3192

17 күн бұрын

The Quran doesn’t contain literally every single thing.

@shahidanfurqan

17 күн бұрын

@@ibrahimali3192 yes, everything of creation is not recorded in Quran. It is the Mother of all Books that contain every single matter and is guarded in the heavens. But Quran contains everything regarding the Deen(16:89, 5:3). So if you find something missing then either you can't find it or it has gone lost just like Torah and Gospel. You have no other way but to remain satisfied with what you have because you cannot invent wahis. All you can do for missing stuff is find the best rational solution that can be sought by research.

Me - Hanafi, Maturidi ☪️🫶

@iymuslim

27 күн бұрын

If you are Hanafi in Fiqh, why don’t you follow Imam abu Hanifa in Aqeedah too? He was a pure athari upon the Quran and sunnah.

@muzammilahmad6111

27 күн бұрын

W

@ismail62

27 күн бұрын

​@@iymuslim They will accept everything except that. Also they'll reject that the madhavs never existed in the times of the 4 imams.

@iymuslim

26 күн бұрын

@@aromatic_curry I didn’t meet him, but his aqeedah is preserved in books

@Zm-mg2qn

26 күн бұрын

كفر

Why following a specific madhab? I mean it's clearly a division in islam , wvery madhab is following their own set of understanding regarding the Quran and the Hadith, you guys claim all of the madhabs to be all coreect , then why were there four musalahs in the Kaaba under the rule of the ottoman empire, the muslim khilafah? People of the followers of different school of thoughts didn't pray behind each other , how can you say that everything they follow is authentic? I think there should be a new fiqh which follows all the correct aspect of every fiqh and denounces all the wrong ones , so that we can reunite the ummah as one body rather than following a certain group while resenting others, Quran is one, Allah is one, the best path is the one told by Prophet Mohammad peace and blessings of Allah be upon and the best of his followes are his companions, when they didn't divide, we shouldn't too , if the scholars know so well than us then scholars that from all of the fiqs must unite and form a fiqh that has all the correct aspect from every fiqh and leave the ones that are wrong.

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

What you are saying contradicts what you claimed at the beginning. If we do what you say then there will only be anpther madhab. You say we should unite on the correct sunnah and understanding and follow the correct rulings and not the wrong ones? This sentence doesnt make sense in the context of saying that the madhab only divide. What was the goal of every madhab or scholar? They tried to understand it as right as possible and to follow the sunnah as correct as possible. People are different and have therefore different perspectives on things. What do you think do the madhahib base their rulings on? On their desires? Other scriptures? They base everything on Quran, Sunnah and the salaf.

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

And even If we where to follow every correct aspect of every Foqh as you said. That would only be the understanding of another group of scholars who think that certain aspects of all the different madhahib are right. You could then have also another scholsrs deriving different rulings from these different madhaahib which they deem to be correct

@3abdussalaam

25 күн бұрын

And also your statement that the companions didnt divide isnt true. We habe clear division in understanding certain sayings of the prophet in the lifetime of the prophet and the prophet ﷺ say anything against those different understandings. And we habe after the death of the prophet ﷺ different schools of thought. In Mekka, Medina and Irak. These were from different companions. There is the understing of Abdullah ibn masud, Abdullah ibn 3abbas, Abdullah ibn umar amd zaid bin thaabit if I remember correctly

"it's from Maliki madhab" so what? I don't follow scholars I follow Quran and sunnah any trust worthy scholar is to be listened to

@iymuslim

27 күн бұрын

My brother, in reality your statement really shows your ignorance. Are the madhaahib based on the bible? No, they are based on the Quran and sunnah. And as a layman like yourself, you need to follow a scholar to understand fiqh, but if you are a student of knowledge then you should learn through a madhab May Allah guide us

@muzammilahmad6111

27 күн бұрын

Okay tayyab, you follow Quran and Sunnah on your own understanding? 1. if you do have multiple rulings from 1 hadith or 1 ayah, will you choose the easiest ruling (forbidden to follow desires from Quran)? the hardest (trying to act pious/bringing unnecessary difficulty isn't "pious")? You, who have probs 0 understanding of usul ul fiqh, usul al hadith, tafsir etc., haven't gotten ijazah (with a chain back to the Prophet sallahu alayhi wasalam), will understand the Quran/hadith better than even a madrasa student? Heres an example, as you don't follow a scholar tell me, whose right, imam abu hanifah or imam shafi here: Allah says, يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ إِذَا قُمْتُمْ إِلَى الصَّلاةِ فاغْسِلُواْ وُجُوهَكُمْ وَأَيْدِيَكُمْ إِلَى الْمَرَافِقِ وَامْسَحُواْ بِرُؤُوسِكُمْ وَأَرْجُلَكُمْ إِلَى الْكَعْبَينِ وَإِن كُنتُمْ جُنُباً فَاطَّهَّرُواْ وَإِن كُنتُم مَّرْضَى أَوْ عَلَى سَفَرٍ أَوْ جَاء أَحَدٌ مَّنكُم مِّنَ الْغَائِطِ أَوْ لاَمَسْتُمُ النِّسَاء فَلَمْ تَجِدُواْ مَاء فَتَيَمَّمُواْ صَعِيداً طَيِّباً فَامْسَحُواْ بِوُجُوهِكُمْ وَأَيْدِيكُم مِّنْهُ مَا يُرِيدُ اللّهُ لِيَجْعَلَ عَلَيْكُم مِّنْ حَرَجٍ وَلَـكِن يُرِيدُ لِيُطَهَّرَكُمْ وَلِيُتِمَّ نِعْمَتَهُ عَلَيْكُمْ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ “O ye who believe! when ye prepare for prayer, wash your faces, and your hands (and arms) to the elbows; Rub your heads (with water); and (wash) your feet to the ankles. If ye are in a state of ceremonial impurity, bathe your whole body. But if ye are ill, or on a journey, or one of you cometh from offices of nature, or ye have been in contact with women, and ye find no water, then take for yourselves clean sand or earth, and rub therewith your faces and hands, Allah doth not wish to place you in a difficulty, but to make you clean, and to complete his favour to you, that ye may be grateful.” [5:6-7 Yusuf Ali translation] أَوْ لاَمَسْتُمُ النِّسَاء “…or ye have been in contact with women…” The Shafi’is maintain that the word “lamastum”, translated here as ‘contact’ is touching by the hand. Imām Ash-Shāfi’ī stated in Al-Umm, “Lams (touching/contact) is done by the hand.” Their opponents disagree and argue that it is reference to coitus. Tell me, who is correct, which ruling do you choose shaykh, does touching a woman break wudu or is it referring to smth elsse?

@muzammilahmad6111

27 күн бұрын

also evidence of this found: The Holy Qurãn states: 'And do not follow desires. You would be led astray from the path of Allah." Thus the need of following only one Imam. That is why the policy of 'pick and choose' has been condemned by all the renowned scholars of Shari'ah. Imam Ibn Tamiyyah, the famous muhaddib and jurist, says in his 'Fatawa': "Some people follow at one time an imam who holds the marriage invalid, and at another time they follow a jurist who holds it valid. They do so only to serve their individual purpose and satisfy their desires. Such a practice is impermissible according to the consensus of all the imams." This Qur'anic verse establishes that there should be a category of people who have learned the religion so as to be qualified in turn to teach it. And Allah has commanded those who do not know a ruling in Sacred Law to ask those who do, by saying in surat al-Nahl, "Ask those who recall if you know not" (Qur'an 16:43), in which the words "those who recall," ahl al-dhikri, indicate those with knowledge of the Qur'an and sunna, at their forefront the mujtahid Imams of this Umma. the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) has said, in the hadith of Bukhari and Muslim: "When a judge gives judgement and strives to know a ruling (ijtahada) and is correct, he has two rewards. If he gives judgement and strives to know a ruling, but is wrong, he has one reward" (Bukhari, 9.133). "If they had referred it to the Messenger and to those of authority among them, then those of them whose task it is to find it out would have known the matter" (Qur'an 4:83)

@ayangamer2664

27 күн бұрын

So ur understanding of the Quran and Sunnah is better than the understanding of great scholars? Ur more knowledgeable than them? Just asking.

@dustyzbrick9510

27 күн бұрын

@@ayangamer2664exactly. This is the dunning-Kruger effect. You should all research it. If you know a little bit you think you know everything, but once you learn a little more you realize you know nothing