Neutrality as a Philosophical Ideal | Prof Jason Stanley (2015)

Professor of Philosophy Jason Stanley, Yale Univeristy, addresses a workshop on "Neutrality as a Philosophical Ideal".
The workshop was hosted by the UCD School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, in conjunction with the Society for Women in Philosophy, on 06 February 2015.
Before joining Yale in 2013, he was Professor II (Distinguished Professor) in the Department of Philosophy at Rutgers University. He has also been a Professor at the University of Michigan (2000-4) and Cornell University (1995-2000). His PhD was earned at the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at MIT in 1995, with Robert Stalnaker as his chair. Jason Stanley received his BA from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1990. He works in Epistemology, Cognitive Science, Philosophy of Language, Social and Political Philosophy, and History of 20th Century Philosophy. He has published three books with Oxford University Press. The first is Knowledge and Practical Interests, which was the winner of the 2007 American Philosophical Association book prize (awarded for the best book published in the field of philosophy in 2005 or 2006 by a scholar 40 years of age or under, or within ten years of the PhD). Professor Stanley's second book, Know How, was published in 2011. The third book with Oxford University Press is a collection of his selected papers on linguistic communication and context, Language and Context (2007). Professor Stanley's book, How Propaganda Works, is forthcoming with Princeton University Press in 2015.

Пікірлер: 14

  • @maxbenser1147
    @maxbenser11475 жыл бұрын

    THE GREAT GERMANS SCIENTIST AND PHILOSOPH MAX BENSE!!! The great german Philosophs, Friedrich Nietzsche, Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marx and Franz Buggle!!!

  • @amadeusdebussy6736
    @amadeusdebussy67365 жыл бұрын

    This is pure sophistry.

  • @intricatelast-name5291

    @intricatelast-name5291

    3 жыл бұрын

    please explain?

  • @onecraftygypsy8816

    @onecraftygypsy8816

    2 жыл бұрын

    sophistry

  • @rogersyversen3633
    @rogersyversen36335 жыл бұрын

    There is a fundamental dichotomy between universal truth and care for a particular. This plays itself out when the question "honey, do I look fat in this dress?" is asked. Is it not obvious that women are not into philosophy because, on average, they have less interest in universal truth than their male counterparts? Men have 20% more upper body strenght than females and are taller. You dont think this fact has an effect on the gender ethics? A female cant simply speak her mind unless she wants to risk making a dangerous enemy out of half the population. An interesting research question would be "to what extent does empathy make things skew into the normative?". Academic "paperwork" on universals is the extreme version of the results showin in the Milgram experiments - where a seperation wall would make people more likely to inflict pain on someone. However, some fields are dominated by women. Here we se the obliteration of truth as a concept. Does it do any good? This is a whole other question.