Welcome to part two of Napoleon in Egypt, rejoining the campaign as he faces imminent attack by a huge Ottoman army... but decides to take the fight to them. It's an action-packed episode that we hope you'll enjoy. Thanks to our video sponsor Ground News. Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world on a transparent platform driven by data. Try Ground News today and get 40% off your subscription: ground.news/epichistory.

@ore6015

2 ай бұрын

Nice ❤❤❤

@Onsidelife

2 ай бұрын

Could you please list the songs you use from the killer soundtracks please. Especially the song you use in the short of ‘what were the Napoleonic wars’ and when Nelson found the French fleet in the last video

@danielsantiagourtado3430

2 ай бұрын

LOVE YOUR CONTENT GUYS 🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤

@Onsidelife

2 ай бұрын

Guys I found it, it’s Aftermath by elison

@EpichistoryTv

2 ай бұрын

The best place for more information about soundtracks is our Patreon page, where we also upload selected soundtracks in full!

I HAVE AN INTERESTING FACT FROM THIS TIME. When Napoleon had made the tough decision to leave his wounded behind he had entrusted them to the care of the Armenian monks in the Monastery of Saint Nicholas in Jaffa. As a sign of his gratitude, he awarded the monks his military tent that he used in that campaign alongside his sword at the time. The painting in the video around the time this medical arrangement was being discussed is the monastery in question with the crenellated white walls in the background. The monks eventually cut the tent into several pieces of ritual clothing called chasubles which were worn by deacons and other seminarians during official church services. These relics and treasures are kept in the Cathedral of Saints James in the Armenian Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem to this very day! I had the honor of wearing one of these chasubles many times when we were asked to assist the church in its services. As a student of history, you could imagine my happiness everytime I wore one of them since they were once a part of the very fabric tent under which Napoleon rested and planned his daring victories. Small Edit: One of the chasubles still clearly bears the original stitching which reads "tent of General Napoleon"

@manavshah8335

2 ай бұрын

Good lord that was sure an interesting fact to hear! Thank you for sharing

@bopper172

2 ай бұрын

What an amazing story, thank you! What an honor you were able to experience

@ciuyr2510

2 ай бұрын

Very nice.

@michaelb5119

2 ай бұрын

Wow thats really interesting. Crazy that you got to experience that

@Dikranovski

2 ай бұрын

My pleasure ladies & gentlemen. History comes alive when you hear stories and anecdotes such as these as opposed to just dates, events and individuals.

I just want to say, this is the best history channel ever. The Napoleonic content made me fall in love with History and I consider Napoleon as one of my greatest heroes. And thanks a large part to this channel, I will now be pursuing History as my career.

@bopper172

2 ай бұрын

Thank you Epic History TV!!!! We all love your amazing lessons!

@chasemanhart

2 ай бұрын

Same here!!

@stefang3709

Ай бұрын

Napoleon was sure an interesting man, but I would never call such a butcher a hero. That would be almost like calling Hitler a hero. Napoleon waged war across Europe for decades? For what exactly? We need less wars and more peace.

@AkshayNumberOne

Ай бұрын

​@@stefang3709 No one in history is completely good or evil. While he did commit atrocities, he also waged brilliant campaigns and introduced several reforms like the Napoleonic Code. It is possible to appreciate one's achievements while also not forgetting the atrocities. It is foolish to turn a blind eye to either. Morover the emperor can't be compared to Hitler. Hitler was a politician, Napoleon was a military leader, commanding absolute loyalty of his soldiers and the last great leader to lead his armies in battle. During Hundred days, the troops sent to capture him joined his side, such was his charisma.

@miroslavjanecek9993

Ай бұрын

@@stefang3709 wars were waged on France, Napoleon was just winning them.

i can hear the sound of cannons near Marengo! let's march together, Epic History TV!

@joshuagrover795

Ай бұрын

I also hear the heart rendering cries of one of Napoleon's dearest friends and one of France's finest general at Marengo. The friendship of Lannes, the strategic and tactical brilliant of Davout, embodied with the courage of Ney.

@porphyry17

Ай бұрын

@@joshuagrover795 i think Desaix d1ed almost instantly. he would have only gasped for air for a few seconds. and yes, he could have been an even greater icon of history if he lived longer...

20:29 this HAS to be one of the most badass moments in history. Not just the bravery, but capturing the enemy commander himself is incredible

@MessiKingofKings

2 ай бұрын

Who cares if it's badass. It was all useless in the end, Western Europe doing stupid things

@porphyry17

2 ай бұрын

@@MessiKingofKings what is your ethnicity?

@porphyry17

2 ай бұрын

ah, a fellow Romanian?

@JohnTheVlach

2 ай бұрын

@@porphyry17 yes

@razhok9725

2 ай бұрын

@MessiKingofKings what you said has nothing to do with whether it was badbass At the end Murat got executed so it was pointless but what he did there was still badass so just stay hating for no reason

Kleber:" We are losing this war" Napoleon:" You mean YOU are losing this war. Bye!"

@joshuagrover795

Ай бұрын

Napoleon's departure proclamation from Egypt in August 1799 in full text is so underwhelming and backstabbing it's no wonder Kléber was scathing, literally declaring: "Napoleon has fled back to Europe shitting his pants, without any regard for his desperate troops in Egypt, who have been sacrificed." "The news from Europe has determined me to proceed to France. I leave command of the army to General Kléber. The army will hear from me forthwith; at present, I can say no more. It costs me great pain to leave troops to whom I am so strongly attached. But my absence will be but temporary, and the General I leave in change has the confidence of the government as well as mine." Essentially Napoleon took his best commanders from Italy such as Lannes, Murat, Berthier, Marmont etc. back to France, effectively jumping ship never to return. In hindsight cold blooded, giving his troops false hope for two long years. "Screw this, I may come back at a better time, but do your best in a shitty situation guys, if you get back to France, I give you a parade, if not, nice knowing you." To be fair to Kléber in the ten months he was in command without clear instructions and with a near mutinous army he tried his best to control the situation with stunning victories outside Cario for example at the Battle of Heliopolis (March 1800) 10,000 French troops vs. 60,000 Ottoman troops. Also, he attempted to negotiate his army's withdrawal from Egypt via the Convention of El Arish (January 1800) that ultimately failed. But the convention's terms were later used as a template by the British to accept the French surrender at Alexandria in September 1801. Fun fact: Kléber's assassination in Cairo on June 14th, 1800, occurred on the same day his great friend General Louis Desaix was killed at the Battle of Marengo in Italy.

@TheSupart91

Ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣😂😂

@Samirustem

Ай бұрын

Yeah and aparently he was killed by some young radical muslim. Thats probably what CNN say. What a proejetion into history. Do people not read theis when they write script. He killed some invader. How can you judge his radicalism?

@crisscross10

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂 hilarious

@pancakemacbuttery9142

Ай бұрын

@@joshuagrover795​​⁠​⁠​⁠ I wish to inform that Davout was not amongst those who left with Napoleon, who was eventually captured by the British for six months and released to France. After he came back and when Napoleon remembers about him he flattery invited him to rejoin the army for the second coalition in Italy, Davout is offended and instead goes to visit his mother first before joining Napoleon. (P.s Bessieres was amongst those who left with Napoleon.)

The siege, where they cut off a Frenchman’s head and displayed it makes me think what did they expect was going to happen next? The fact that there was a slaughter afterwards does not surprise me, and should not have surprised the Ottomans.

@notyourbusiness1980

Ай бұрын

They where Muslims... Thinking isn't their key asset

@Pragmatist101

Ай бұрын

​@notyourbusiness1980 just like Hamas when they attacked Israel......now they the Palestinians getting slaughtered again.

@elmascapo6588

Ай бұрын

​@@notyourbusiness1980tell that to the men of Acre

@Cardi84

Ай бұрын

If they thought it would impress the French, who were the most famous head cutters of the decade, they were wrong.

@neos9898

Ай бұрын

@@elmascapo6588 without the british the city would have fallen easily

Ever since your very first video on Napoleon I have been addicted this series. It's everything that the Napoleon movie isn't. It's expertly and lovingly crafted into an extremely watchable and informative video, each and every time.

Kleber: "1500 against 30000? I like those odds."

@AlexC-ou4ju

Ай бұрын

common French W.

@ernestoA.1999

27 күн бұрын

Kleber was probably Frances best General after Napoleon , Hoche and Desaix , an architect who became. A soldier , he was a veteran of the war in Germany, he clearly knew the difference between a discipline Prussian army and an army of Peasants like the Ottomans .

A letter from Jazzar Ahmad Pasha to Napoleon: "The Ottoman Empire did not appoint me as a minister and leader to hand over this city to you. I am Bosnian Cezzar Ahmed Pasha. I will not give you a drink from this city until I reach the rank of martyr."

@c.augustedupin8860

2 ай бұрын

and nepoleon duly smashed him.

@AnatolianHittite

2 ай бұрын

​@@c.augustedupin8860The loser Napoleon left Syria without even looking back.Go and learn history

@kayagurcu2814

2 ай бұрын

@@c.augustedupin8860 well havent you watched doc. my friend, its napoleon's first major defeat

@dale6947

2 ай бұрын

@@c.augustedupin8860 Did you not watch the video? He defeated Napoleon.

@c.augustedupin8860

2 ай бұрын

@@dale6947 lol...hiding like a dog. that's not a defeat. only men to defeat him are Charles,de tolly, Wellington,bluchard...not some debouched pasha

Documentary films are popular in Korea... Thank you so much for releasing such a great historical documentary for free.^^

It's incredible what Napoleon achieved with so little resources and men against such odds time after time. If the British didn't sink the French fleet and he kept receiing small amounts of reinforcements it's not impossible he could have marched onto and taken Constantinople in a couple of years considering how poorly the ottomans were performing on land.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

"So little resources"?! 😂 40,000 elite troops from the best military in the world along with the best of the French Navy is not "so little resources". Quite the opposite. What is really incredible how reckless wasteful and costly the pointless invasion of Egypt was. Napoleon lost the best of the French Navy for no good reason, ensuring that the French Navy would never catch up to the British Navy as Egypt would become the first of multiple unmitigated Napoleonic military disasters. That is what actually happened, not what would have happened as you dream of.

@timjones2822

Ай бұрын

@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators 40,000 men is a fairly small expedition only slightly more than Sir John Moore's failed expedition and with his men Napoleon conquered and occupied egypt and advanced into Judea defeating armies 4 times larger than his own. Compare that to what sir John moore achieved in spain with comparable resources (nothing). This efficiency is what allowed Napoleon to stand out from his peers there's a reason Wellington said of Napoleon 'his presence on the field made the difference of forty thousand men'. That is a real quote from someone who knew what he was talking about not some insecure bluster from what I can presume to be an internet nationalist given your username.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

@@timjones2822 And if I could fly and had x-ray vision, I would be Superman. What would have happened is not what actually happened. The best of the French Navy destroyed. Their best ships, admirals and seamen underwater. Depleting elite French troops, forced marches eerily similar to what would happen in Russia but with sand instead of snow. Napoleon abandoning his troops, never sending reinforcements to aide as France is forced to withdraw Egypt in defeat. A costly, pointless failed invasion for Napoleon. That is what actually happened.

@timjones2822

Ай бұрын

@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators and if you could read sources ciritically and study history you could be making constructive arguments. You keep asserting elite troops were sent but these were kept in Europe to defend France not sent on a mission the Directory wanted to see fail.Then you keep asserting Napoleon sent the fleet which is fine as long you you ignore that he wasnt consul yet let alone commander in chief of all armed forces, the loss at Aboukir bay rests in the hands of the naval commander not Napoleon. To return to my example, you wouldn't blame the leader of the british fleet who evacuated moores remants for moores humiliation on the land campaign. This is just the reverse. But again given your name you seem to have an axe to fring rather than interest in recognising the drmarcation of authorities. But I've wasted enough time on someone who has no interest or capacity to see reason.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

@@timjones2822 If "if"s and "but"s were candy and nuts......Let me tell you a more compelling "if", because your ifs are mundane and predictable. If The Egyptian Campaign had been a stand alone war, and had not merged into the War of Second Coalition, France would have lost SIX wars under Napoleon. 1)Egyptian Campaign 2) Haitian Invasion of 1804 3) Peninsular War 4) Russian Invasion 5) 6th Coalition 6) 7th Coalition. No one lost more wars for one country. Now that is a compelling "if".

Eagerly waiting for the battle of Marengo. Truly astonishing series!

Napoleon's Egyptian Campaign is not talked about enough. Loved the video. It was great to listen too.

Love the new logo guys! Great job on it. And your Napoleónic content is awesome 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵

@Samirustem

Ай бұрын

To bad they are racist. Calling someone who killed invader young radical is just absurd. He was killed by locals. Thats all

I’ve learned more about napoleon from this channel than in any history class. Heard a lot about this infamous siege. Looking forward to finally seeing it

@wilsondavid7589

Ай бұрын

what would you like to see, colonialism?

@phenomenal8196

Ай бұрын

@@wilsondavid7589absolutely, I call it winning

@irenehartlmayr8369

Ай бұрын

​@@wilsondavid7589It had nothing to do with " colonialism "...

@jeandavies1788

Ай бұрын

You wouldn’t wanted to be alive then and suffered due to this war only to remember it in this life it was barbaric

@ommsterlitz1805

Ай бұрын

Do you know who lived in Egypt before muslims ?@@wilsondavid7589

You should also cover Suvorov's expedition in Italy, there are some great battles there!

@andrewshaw1571

2 ай бұрын

Suvorov is worth a video on himself regardless.

@jarogniewtheconqueror2804

2 ай бұрын

And Moreau or the other French revolutionary fronts

@ernestoA.1999

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804not Moreau but Joubert

@umjackd

Ай бұрын

And Suvorov in Switzerland as well.

@ericdimateo5004

Ай бұрын

Battle of Zürich for example

New Epic History Napoleon stuff, love to see it. Waterloo Remastered is a dream.

Good idea, Epic History team. Looking forward to it!

As a Person who was started War and Peace just hours before, that's video would be perfect for me to Understand Napoleonic era and his influence on Europe. Thank you Epic History❤❤❤❤ because your work deserves treasure but you give to us free.

Napoleon who although was the outnumbered General in fact the Legend to take out an Ottoman army nearly 10-1 his size and defeat the Ottomans once more at Aboukir Bay, who commemorated the Legend of Alexander the Great although short lived, the news from Europe which determined him to leave Egypt for Paris and win the 2nd coalition war, to be fair for viewers to know this is a decision many Generals have taken before, because if they got something to offer for their homeland then they'll make the toughest responsible actions to make good decisions happen, This was a stunning video Toby and can't wait for the Battle of Cape St. Vincent in your next video.

@AnatolianHittite

Ай бұрын

Even if the Ottoman Empire was weakened, Napoleon had no chance.He tasted his first major defeat when he met the real Turkish army in Acre.

@theraginggager7303

Ай бұрын

@@AnatolianHittite maybe so, due to Acre's defensive position with the sea for the British and the determination by Al-Jazzar's men who were well disciplined to drive out the French, but let's not forget Napoleon's main objective was to defeat the biggest Ottoman army developing in Syria whilst also trying to defeat the Army of Rhodes in Aboukir so in Contrast although Acre may have been a defeat it was also a success because Napoleon defeated the Army of Syria and went back to Egypt because of his victory, not to just paint his defeat but to paint his success in Egypt, because let's not forget Napoleon always saw a war or battle as an art to his successes so Napoleon did gain some significance in Egypt even if things did go sour for him, matter of fact "The Institute of Egypt" still exists to this day so at least Napoleon did gain something out of the rubble.

@AnatolianHittite

Ай бұрын

@@theraginggager7303 Napoleon's main goal was to advance and he couldn't even get past the Turkish troops in Syria. Istanbul and Anatolia were too ambitious even for Napoleon and he couldn't do it.

@theraginggager7303

Ай бұрын

@@AnatolianHittite Ok, but you're missing the point, Napoleon knew he wouldn't be able to get peace for the Egyptian province from the Ottoman Empire due to Salim III canceling all negotiation and compromise so that he could crush the Ottomans, he didn't expect to win the campaign because of the loss of the French fleet he only needed to drive out the Ottomans so that they couldn't bring a coup in Egypt to bring the Mamluk back to power but Napoleon drove them all out at the Battles Mount Tabor and Aboukir, so unless you want to continue to think I'm wrong I suggest you look at the video and hear what Charles (the narrator) said in the video to be correctly confirmed

@AnatolianHittite

Ай бұрын

@@theraginggager7303 My friend, I mean that Napoleon was defeated when he faced real Turkish troops like at Acre instead of vassal troops in Egypt. So Napoleon could not do against the Ottomans what he did against Spain, Prussia, Austria and Russia.Not because he did not want to do it, but because he could not defeat the Ottomans to do it.

this is my favorite channel on this app. Absolute legends everyone involved in the production of the videos. The depiction of everythign is unparalleled.

In Egypt Napoleon's legacy is not forgotten, our legal system is still based on the French system to this day. the French also founded the Diwan and as this video stated the french savants (particularly Champollion) basically created the field of Egyptology. this is not to minimise the deaths he caused but thanks to Napoleon's expedition Egyptians are able to rediscover so much of our own history after ages of occupation from anatolia.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

Egypt's legal system is based on Napoleon's French legal system? Really, when did Egypt reinstate slavery and the slave trade in conformity to Napoleon's French legal system? Also I thought Napoleon was supposed to be acting for the benefit and interest of France. What did France gain from such a failed invasion where they lost the best of their Navy and thousands of elite soldiers in defeat?

@porphyry17

Ай бұрын

what about the occupation from Arabia and worshiping a 7th century p3d0 warlord?

@merdiolu

Ай бұрын

Sorry but the concept of "diwan" was established in Ottoman Empire and their provinces like Mamluk ruled Egypt long before invasion of Napoleon

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

@@porphyry17 In order for the Egyptian legal system to be based in conformity to Napoleon's French legal system, Egypt has to reinstate slavery and the slave trade. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_20_May_1802

@Jabari20-wh2sk

Ай бұрын

Just like in Malta ( a few weeks before arriving in Egypt) Napoleon abolished Slavery. According to British Historian Andrew Roberts ' By direct Decree, Napoleon established a postal system , street lighting and cleaning, a coahcc service between Cairo and Alexandriaa mint and a rational tax system with lower imposition on the egyptian fallaheen than the mamluks' extortionary demands. he also abolished feudalism replacing it with rule by the Diwan, set up a new Frenh trading company, built modern plague hospitals and produced Egypt's first printed books. None of these reforms were undertaken on orders fro mthe directory who were unable to get messages through; they were entirely on Napoleon's initiative.' ''The Revolution's principle of Equality offended much of the Koran, yet al;Jabarti appreciated how well the French treated local workers in their building projkects and followed their chemical and electrical experiments with interest...was disgusted by the way the FrenchDhimmis (infidels) allowed ' the lowliest copts, Syrian and Orthodox Christians and Jews' to ride horses and carry swords' '

Just casually mentions the fact that Junot defeated a cavalry force 10 times his size (400-500) against 5000

@Commonsensical513

26 күн бұрын

To be fair it's French against Turkish, you would expect one shark to defeat 10 catfish.

@kasadam85

14 күн бұрын

​@@Commonsensical513Would love to see those "sharks" face the Turkish "catfishes" in the present day 😂

@Commonsensical513

14 күн бұрын

​@@kasadam85 haha damn I guess you really don't like Turks if you would love to see them get their cheeks clapped time and again. I mean military-wise a rematch today wouldn't be fair; France has blue water navy,domestically produced cruise missiles nukes and an aircraft carrier. Unlike Turkey France builds most of its own kit no begging the Russians for air defence systems and the US for planes. On an individual level there's a reason nobody exactly thinks 'healthy' when they think of turks. Turkiye's obesity rate is 10% higher than France's, 30% of Turks smoke when 20% of French do. As a general rule turks live 6 years less than the French. Just like in Napoleon's time the turks truly are the sick men of Europe. But to be fair I don't blame them given Turkiye's economic state I'd probably have to eat cheaply and unhealthily too!

It all went like 3 minutes. Such an amazing work!

Your Napoleon series is absolutely the best historical content, that I've even found on KZread! Thank you for your work!

I can’t wait, your episodes only become better albeit the other ones were already almost at the max. I wonder if this is the one that will touch the max. In my personal opinion you have produced the best videos of all videos I have ever seen. Once again, respect your work so much.

British fleet are the nightmare of Napoléon and the french

@solwen

Ай бұрын

The only thing the British fleet managed to do was to save the UK from a French invasion really. It, obviously, played no role during the major campaigns on the continent.

@pomperidus

Ай бұрын

As a Frenchman I often dream about the British fleet harrassing me and my troops

@Xenonfastfall

Ай бұрын

​@@solwen it was a direct cause on how the entire continental system worked, the French had to rely on diplomatic means to isolate British trade because they could not enforce a naval blockade. This in turn led to trade being major motives for both heavy french involvement in spain (peninsula war) and the invasion of russia. To say the Royal Navy's control of the seas did not impact the matters on the continent is absurd and flatout wrong.

@teviottilehurst

Ай бұрын

​@@solwenBritish navy implemented a blockade against Napolean. The Brits played an important role in the Peninsula war and at Waterloo. The Brits were the main financiers of the coalition wars against Napolean. Britain played a pivotal role in the Napoleanic Wars. Read a history book.

@placebojesus5652

14 күн бұрын

Were*

Dude been waiting for this forever. Smith was a legend and so was this battle. So pivotal!

I am still amazed and in awe, that this content si completely for free. It inspired me to become your Patreon supporter, because you FULLY deserve it! Respect and cheers from Slovakia

@EpichistoryTv

Ай бұрын

Thank you!

I love all your Napoleon content more than any move made in the last 10 years. Great series well done sir!

The only sad part about this series is that it's slowly coming to it's end.

@Fuzznator

Ай бұрын

sadly but they still have material left like marengo, trafalgar, dresden

@burnstick1380

Ай бұрын

@@Fuzznator Marengo is in this 5 years gap that they will close. But yeah some spinoffs would be cool though not featuring napoleon (trafalgar, any naval encounter, ...)

@Fuzznator

Ай бұрын

@@burnstick1380 the nile also and even less decisive battles like lutzen and bautzen would be interesting but i dont think they are gonna do those two, dresden i hope. ulm would be interesting also

Amazing episode, the animations, the music. Spectacular work guys! Keep it up we support you!

This channel truly is the greatest of the great on KZread for covering Napoleonic history in the most entertaining, unbiased, well narrated and visually appealing. Would love to potentially see a video on Trafalgar in the future!

@EpichistoryTv

Ай бұрын

Thank you! Trafalgar is in the pipeline!

Absolutely top notch production in every way, as always. Thanks for your hard work

thank you Epic History for putting your time and effort on Napoleon. Even though he has ups and downs, he is a man i always look up to, especially his beloved Marshal Oudinot (a Marshal for which Napoleon said, was timid, i felt i would have been like that with the Emperor but still amazed), thank you so much! i wish so dearly to live during his lifetime to witness his legacy unfold with my very own eyes.

The level of quality of your content is just over the top. Even the longest videos make me forget to breathe. I hope you keep working hard because you show people what they have to see. Thank you!

@user-vh3fr3lb8w

Ай бұрын

You can sit all day and watch them sure kk

Another Epic History Masterpiece 🇫🇷🇹🇷🇬🇧

Extremely well done, you tell the story like no one else. Please continue to make more.

Can't wait! I'm sure it's another amazing video. Love the new logo btw!

This masterful presentation fills in numerous ambiguities in Andrew Roberts' otherwise brilliant bio. The battles at Acre, Mount Tabor and Aboukir are detailed with graphic depictions of troop movements and other descriptions missing from his tour de force. Bravo to Epic History once again!

I love the New Logo! Although I will miss the old one too... Great Video... I can't wait for the Napoleon Saga to continue into the second campaign in Italy!

We just watched such an epic masterpiece of warfare, strategy, intrigue and action, perfectly interpreted by a high-quality content creator. It’s surreal, we are lucky for this.

An impeccable production as always

Napoleons plan was pretty interesting actually. So I know, he had planned to march through Persia to India. He did ally Persia later, which was being modernized by the energetic and modernising prince Abbas Mirza, that later reformed his army to beat the larger Ottoman and participated in Napoleon's invasion of Russia. If Napoleon would had defeated the Ottomans, allied them, or win in Russia (possible by sticking to his original plan) it would be realistic for him to be able to march with a Franco-Iranian army to India. Iran would be able to support with a modern army to make the campaign easier. I also believe Napoleon, if he played his cards right could started a Franco-Iranian lead independence war in India which would not just bleed Britain dry, but also create an important ally to France. They would had been Iberia for the British. Napoleon in India would had been something interesting to read in the history books.

@dale6947

2 ай бұрын

That was logistically impossible and would never had happened.

@rhelyputra4680

2 ай бұрын

Bro thought he Alexander

@LePersophone

2 ай бұрын

Very interesting post ! I did some research into the French archives and the relationship of Napoleon with Persia is incredible to study. To be precise, he planned to ally Persia because first he wanted to reach independent Afghanistan (Durrani Empire) in order to muster an army to lead across India and join indians rebels. Why Afghanistan ? Because of the Pashtun people living across this country and parts of Western India which could have been useful for an invasion with the support of French troops. Despite Napoleon fail in Egypt, this plan will stay active by negociating an official treaty (Finckenstein) and sending an ambassador into Persia for trying to convince the Shah to ally with France. But spies and banditry indirectly paid by Britain will put an end to this plan by intercepting communications and by weighing support for the Shah against the Russian threat, especially after the war in the Caucasus and the famous French retreat from Russia.

@ernestoA.1999

2 ай бұрын

Knowing Napoleons stubbornness and and ambition, im sure in India, with a strong army he would march and try to conquer China itself, or st least part of it

@konstantinosnikolakakis8125

2 ай бұрын

@dale6947 I wouldn’t say it’s impossible. I’d rate it quite possible. Hard, but possible. Hard but possible in the same way as Hannibal marching over the Alps.

Excellet work 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 that deserves 👍🏻 but I noticed a small mistake on the map. Dalmatia wasn't part of Ottoman empire since 1699. In 1797. after fall of Venice Dalmatia was under Austrian rule for short period between 1797.-1805. After battle of Austerlitz it was part of Kingdom of Italy 1805.-1809. and after battle of Wagram it was part of Illyrian provinces 1809.-1813. Greetings from Croatia

Woah, idk if that has been done before, but notice how when we return to the battlefield map at 20:00 the shores on both flanks are now stained bloodied after the desperate retreat of the Ottomans to the sea and then just seeing the French army continue their march upward. That was a cool detail to show the aftermath.

a French messenger is beheaded, and his head placed on a spike. Napoleon: And I took that personally

@user-fl5mq9kp7g

7 күн бұрын

Napoleon: A nice lie 😂😂😂😂😂

Can't wait For it! Love your content guys 😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤

Napoleon's victories of Mount Thabor and 2nd Aboukir were very good victories. If Napoleon had not failed at the siege of Acre , he would have conquered all the Middle East since Egypt until India.

@jarogniewtheconqueror2804

2 ай бұрын

If he had a steady supply line he could have ended the Ottomans the same way Alexander did Persia

@las_espannas

2 ай бұрын

​@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804I think so .

@johnstarks7759

Ай бұрын

But he didnt. He ran away and left his men to die like an opportunistic coward.

@masterplokoon8803

Ай бұрын

He had barely 10 thousand men to campaign with he couldn't sustain any supply line over or garrison even a portion of that territory. The campaign was lost when the British sank his fleet at Aboukir. It was always doomed to fail and the idea to invade Egypt was bad from the beggining.

@archivesoffantasy5560

Ай бұрын

That’s quite a stretch, he couldn’t take a city in Syria, but if he took that city he’d reach India? I’m not saying it was beyond his capabilities but he’d need much more resources.

This channel seems to be very different from any other History Documentary channel, Not only that this channel has high-quality content but they seem to add a vibe that suits the Environment and the Event. I really thank the Content Creators for their work and effort! I would love to potentially see Krasny with full cover!

Another wonderful and well done documentary. I have studied early military history for over 60 years now and i assure you that i am always impressed with your hard work and presentation! Thank you so much my friends.

Noo why change the old logo? 😢 it was perfect the whay it was, this new one seems a but generic to me.. but anyways, I love your content guys, keep the amazing work ❤

Amazing video as always, thank you!

I just noticed that you have a new logo. I love it! But not as much as I love your content! Learning more and more about Napoleon from you all!

Brilliant as always! Thanks for everything you do!

Thank you for this fascinating piece of work.

So glad i found this channel. Awesome videos for a history fan. Well done

The Quality of these videos is just insane bro Wish you all the best from my heart ❤ because you guys will not make us look very childish and dizzy in front of our children in the future

A word where Epic History has the same Budget as Ridley Scott is a perfect one.

08:24 Commodore Sir Sidney Smith , from Royal Navy was like James Bond of French Revolution/Napoleonic War era. He torched half of French Navy and most of its supplies to crisp during evacuation of Toulon at the last stage of siege of Toulon in 1793. He was involved in several intelligence operations in Revolutionary France at Bretagne and captured in 1794 and held as prisoner of war for three years before escaping from Le Temple prison outside Paris ( almost an impossible feat but he got aid from French monarchist agents he planted) He had a personal feud against Napoleon , waged a very effective campaign in Holy Land and Egypt during French invasion and occupation of Egypt and Levant. For example when French sent propaganda leaflets both among Christians and Muslims of Levant , Sir Sidney made a counter propaganda , displaying French propaganda leaflets aimed seperately to Christians and Muslims to each other that wrote that Napoleon would destroy Christians or Muslims etc...That made both sides to become hostile to French. It was Commodore Smith's ship of line HMS Tigre that intercepted and captured the flotilla which carried French siege guns bound to Napoleon's army before Acre. He also led defences of British sailors and marines and given command of a large Turkish contingent to defend the wall of Acre. Later he made more psychological warfare against French out of Acre , displaying their captured siege guns and sending British newspapers (arrived from Britain a few months late) via couriers during truces in fighting so Napoleon and French realised how badly French situation turned out in Italy in War of Second Coalition and French Army got demoralised. Napoleon then determined to go back to France ASAP since all gains he made for France inItaly was lost there.

@user-gd3xy2vl1s

Ай бұрын

Sir Sidney was a legend!

I love this channel. I'm an English learner and I also love history and I enjoy listening what I love in British accent ❤

Outstanding work! I would also love to see the war of the second coalition on top of this masterpiece

Been waiting for this!

Kleber was an S tier general, with skills that would rival his compatriots Napoleon and Moreau. It's also worth noting that Eugene was with Napoleon throughout the whole campaign, he was with him in Acre when they almost got hit with a cannon ball.

This video was so well made!! Whenever I see Napoleon, I click

I was so confused at first because of your profile picture, I was like: what is this video, I don't remember subscribing to this channel!? 😂

This is a masterpiece. Thank you!

I have to be honest, at 25:13 I got a tear in my eye. Say what you may about the expedition, the fact that they found the answer to a language that has always left our species in wonder is something that’s truly beautiful. Epic history never ceases to amaze me.

@porphyry17

Ай бұрын

indeed ❤❤❤

@user-fl5mq9kp7g

7 күн бұрын

The French are still as smart as their newest Berbers. This is very amazing

Please post more of Napoleon’s history!

you guys tell great stories loved the video 👍👍👍👍 . cant wait for the next one in the time of Napoleon

Astonishing work as always! 🥂

i love how even this early, you can see the seeds of Napoleon's downfall in his personality. Stubborn and misguided ambitions to be the "next Alexander", a desire to win at all costs -- which of course, ended up costing him everything.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

Yes, while running a juggernaut French military into the ground. Napoleon was nothing more than a delusional thug with deranged delusions of grandeur hijacking a powerful military/arsenal from a lost and confused nation. Napoleon was not the next Alexander or Caesar, great military commanders who end in total military victory, he was the first Hitler, goons who run the powerful militaries they seized to total destruction.

Your videos always bring me joy

@Caninek999

Ай бұрын

Thank you

Informative and most interesting video once again, love the use of the maps!👍👍

Another quality production, love these videos

Despite many people consider the Egyptian campaign as a failure, Napoleon still humiliated Ottoman forces multiple times ( being way outnumbered) and even some British ones when they aided the Turks. If Napoleon had gotten more reinforcements when he ned and his fleat managed to win the British or at least not get completeky destroyed , I am sure he would march from Palestine to Syria (and maybe would also occupy Baghdat) and would threat even Constantinople itself. But still his great wins in Egypt and Levant secured him the extra reputation he ned to lunch a coup and establish himself as First Consul (with the help of Talleyrand, his brother and his army of course )

@Leaffordes

2 ай бұрын

I'm not an expert, but Ottoman forces seem to have been defeated by most regular European armies it faced at this time, despite heavily outnumbering them. Here are a few examples against the Russians: Kagul (1770); Kozludzha (1774); Rymnik (1789); Măcin (1791); Arpachai (1807); Batin (1810); Slobozia (1811). And I doubt the result would've been much different if they fought other European nations, such as Prussia or the United Kingdom.

@walideg5304

2 ай бұрын

To be honest the Ottoman Empire was already the sick man of Europe. Far from its past glory. Blocked by a Janissaries dictatorship that was extremely difficult to move for Sultans and their Vizirs. The janissaries even with multiple severe military defeats were still organising the political life of the Empire. They did not adapt their army to the modern ones in Europe.

@Giorgos-ee5kn

2 ай бұрын

Very true, but you also forget the factor of weather. As also video says, that kind of weather for the French army wasn't suitable. Heavy sun and hot weather especially marching through the desert, really made them suffer.@@Leaffordes

@1995thaify

2 ай бұрын

​@@Giorgos-ee5knI completely agree napoleon made wonders with what he had and even when he left kleber did wwll until getting assassinated

@marshallvorwaerts

2 ай бұрын

Kind of true. But we can’t deny the fact that the ottoman army was nowhere near as equipped or organized. Still mostly composed of cavalry, peasant militia, which completely ran off the battle after the first failed charge. Therefore its still highly impressive but also wasn’t too hard to accomplish while he also never actually faced the full might of the ottomans with janissaries etc. but mostly levies,militias of local warlords which nearly only composed out of people from all corners of the empire but Turks. The soldiers at Jaffa for example were majorily Albanians and circassians. It’s just that anyone from the Ottoman Empire was called a Turk at that time.

Will this series continue? Its incredible

are you planning to do a video on the second italian campaign and the battle of marengo? scarce few youtube videos cover this topic and I feel like it would tie up your incredible series on napoleonic history very well

It was great as always, I hope the next video will be about the battle of Marengo (1800), and it will be as good as this one❤🔥

Despite some amazing tactical feats such as the Pyramids and Mount Tabor, the Egyptian and Syrian Campaigns of 1798-99 were indeed an overall complete failure and the Syrian Campaign especially was one of Napoleon's biggest mistakes. What I would like to see is a video series on the Italian Campaign of 1800, including the Battle of Marengo.

@bretonneux3389

10 күн бұрын

the syrian campaign, indeed. For the egyptian campaign, it's to nuance a bit, but at the end, it was a failure yeah.

8:48 for a split second my mind wandered and I thought I was watching a video about the Crusades, so strange to think of Napoleon in the Holy Land

@MrTwentycent90

Ай бұрын

It is the crusade of the French revolution.

I have waited so much to watch this episode! please publish faster! tnx.

Best channel on youtube, not even close

Thank you very much for the Arabic translation, dear sir

@porphyry17

2 ай бұрын

>Babylonian >asks for Arabic translations don't you have a bit of pride left?

Great narration and graphics as always. 👍👍👍

This is so unbelievably good. Thank you.

7:12 Napoleon really needs to stop delivering his siege guns via sea If I recall correctly something similar happened in italy where Nelson captured his siege guns on the way to Mantuna

one of the best and more informative videos seen lately. bravo

Excelente !! Muchas gracias por seguir colgando estas joyas, yo siempre a la espera del próximo episodio, el mejor canal de sobre las guerras napoleónicas, saludos de Perú.

Love the music they used throughout the video while Napoleon was in Egypt and the Levant.

The more I learn about Napoleon the more I appreicate him, I know it's frowned upon these says to look at history the lens of 'great man history' but if there ever was such a man it was Napoleon. Just the good he did in Egypt alone in terms of hispital ,new roads, postal services, enfrachising traditionally discriminated against minorities etc all that in just under a year is impressive.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

Napoleon did not do anything that you mentioned in Egypt, other than LOSE. Napoleon did not build any new roads, postal services, you are fabricating all of that. I understand, too cowardly for an ugly truth, so you have to fabricate a pretty lie of what Napoleon was not, lack of courage much.....Seizing total power from a lost and confused nation in a chaotic revolution, hijacking a powerful military in the process, establishing a dictatorship under the term "emperor", imprisoning and executing political rivals reinstating slavery and the slave trade, denying women basic rights, invading multiple countries for personal ambition, running the French military into the ground in total defeat at the cost of millions of lives, executing prisoners, abusing his army, abusing the French youth with conscription, and the most important part ending in total defeat, don't forget to mention that part, the truth.

@Commonsensical513

Ай бұрын

@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators In my culture it is considered rude arrogant to speak of something you know nothing about like you are some form of authority. Rather you should embrace the wisdom of those who DO know better than you and stay humble.

@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators

Ай бұрын

@@Commonsensical513 You have to falsely attribute positive things to Napoleon, positive things that he did not do, because you are too cowardly for the ugly truth. Too cowardly to accept that a deranged delusional thug could never rise to the top and seize a powerful military/arsenal from a lost and confused nation, abusing his own citizens. You can't stand that all warmongering, death, destruction and suffering through abuse of power was simply for the self-interested delusions of grandeur of a deranged man, a deranged man who seized total power from a lost and confused nation in a rotten revolution. A rotten failed degraded revolution that produced a rotten failed degraded product. Nothing more than a power-hungry thug who ran the juggernaut military that he seized into the ground in total defeat, at the cost of millions of lives. But of course that can't happen you say in your cowardice, only the best of the best rise to the top in Europe.

@jonshive5482

Ай бұрын

Don't forget Alexander the Great or Gaius Julius Caesar. Talk about leadership, tactical and strategic skill, and incredibly good fortune.

@oddballsok

Ай бұрын

Sure, and Hitler built autobahnen and railroads.. when he didn’t focus on deathcamps and reprisal executions… Good deeds trump bad ones, hey ?!

Thanks!

@Footy_EAFC-Editz

29 күн бұрын

RESPECT

Superb video as always, liked the old channel design (Red/Black with a star) better to be honest, but doesn't change the content quality

Can't wait for this!

The painting in 7:15 is from the naval battle of Grand Port in Mauritius islands in 1810, which resulted in a french victory and had nothing to do with events in Acre. I see that he flags of the ships have somehow been removed, as the dismasted ship in the centre of the picture was actually a british one.

@FireEagle1796

2 ай бұрын

I suppose they could not find a painting of the actual event?

@maisonraider4593

Ай бұрын

not all events were afforded a painting back then. certainly not the less significant@@FireEagle1796

The French messengers were first tortured, castrated before being beheaded, Napoleon gave the Ottomans a taste of their own cruelty, Napoleon wrote in his diary “ the fury of the soldiers was at its peak everybody was put to the sword “.

By far the best documentary history channel out here

One of the reasons I started watching KZread, finally after waiting two months.

12:04 I thought Kleber had formed two infantry squares during the battle of Mount Tabor?

@FireEagle1796

Ай бұрын

Yes - but by the time of Napoleon’s arrival they had merged into one