Multiple uplinks using PCC, Load balancing

Ғылым және технология

0:00 - Intro
4:56 - Routing tables and routes
6:47 - Match outgoing traffic to incoming
9:53 - PCC - distribute connections
12:57 - LAN to Internet routing marks
14:00 - Testing setup
15:08 - Summary
Load Balancing: help.mikrotik.com/docs/displa...
Mangle: help.mikrotik.com/docs/displa...
Policy Routing: help.mikrotik.com/docs/displa...

Пікірлер: 220

  • @tmcarter3
    @tmcarter3 Жыл бұрын

    Fantstic video... These videos are SO valiable and I wish these were done 15 years ago! Martins, you have explained this is terms that are easily understood; and easily repeatable. I know there were examples on website; but this gives the "picture is worth a 1000 words" a brand new meaning. Thank you!! I look forward to future config overviews.

  • @domhamai

    @domhamai

    11 ай бұрын

    And a video is a thousand pictures!

  • @dvreshta
    @dvreshta Жыл бұрын

    Mikrotik just discovered a new talent on content creation. Great job Martins!

  • @ksenyxths
    @ksenyxths Жыл бұрын

    The way this guy explained such an advanced topic with such simplicity is mind-blowing. It's like he's telling a captivating story that even a 10-year-old kid could understand. I'm amazed at his ability to break down complex concepts and make them accessible to a wide audience. This is the kind of teaching we need more of - making knowledge accessible to everyone. Kudos to him for his exceptional communication skills!

  • @RuouniKenshin
    @RuouniKenshin11 ай бұрын

    Awesome video! I hope you keep making educational videos like these because your OS and products are amazing and teaching people how to use them is just another way to show them to a wider audience.

  • @easypr
    @easypr4 ай бұрын

    It took 10 minutes to setup , with 2 isp working perfectly , great description . Thank You

  • @harrysugiarto
    @harrysugiarto Жыл бұрын

    Nice video...one of the best tutorials for load balancing PCC...👍👏👏👏

  • @Kredo800
    @Kredo800 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks. There are plenty suspicious & unverified DIY instructions, having the "official" one is very valuable.

  • @glrfi4eva
    @glrfi4eva9 ай бұрын

    the best mangle tutorial - I have been looking for days for something like this that will actually work in v7+

  • @florentinbarbura7808
    @florentinbarbura78082 ай бұрын

    Thank you, concise, concrete, very helpful explanation, very useful in OS7 versions.

  • @arttrout8236
    @arttrout823611 ай бұрын

    Great JOB! I have been having trouble with my 2 wan system using another multi wan scenario. This one sounds like the best thought plan for my application.

  • @flisskennigen4675
    @flisskennigen4675 Жыл бұрын

    Nice video. Very informative. Thank you for the video Mārtiņš & team.

  • @keletk
    @keletk Жыл бұрын

    fantastic video martins have explained clearly and simply....please add a video with configuration of failover recursive routes based on config of this video

  • @Joshv918
    @Joshv918 Жыл бұрын

    Love these videos!! Helped me get into mikrotik faster and made it easy.. maybe adding to this design would of been nice to see recursive routes .. Thank you!!

  • @mauriciohenriques3820
    @mauriciohenriques38209 ай бұрын

    Excellent video. I could be complemented by adding how to incorporate recursive routing and ISPs with DHCP address attribution on this scenario, as the "default gateway" for each ISP changes over time.

  • @19HOKAGE68
    @19HOKAGE68 Жыл бұрын

    Nice! Part 2 please 🙏 thank you.

  • @SuperSiyko
    @SuperSiyko3 ай бұрын

    Thank you for such a clear and qualitative explanation. I would like more videos like best practice options, especially about load balance, wan or vpn failover etc. Thank

  • @troelse.nrmlle4625
    @troelse.nrmlle462510 ай бұрын

    Time well spent 👍, we like them.

  • @sudanking99
    @sudanking99 Жыл бұрын

    Great video, will done. I think you forget mentioned NAT.

  • @alekseykharchenko2769
    @alekseykharchenko2769 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you from yours video settings router demonstration. I will try this settings in my router.

  • @unumpolum
    @unumpolum Жыл бұрын

    Thank you. This is what I needed.

  • @alciomar
    @alciomar6 ай бұрын

    Excellent video!

  • @jermainebrown8615
    @jermainebrown86152 ай бұрын

    Great video! Just a small twist: if your connection is not local, use the unicast option in the classifiers.

  • @yeo1397
    @yeo1397 Жыл бұрын

    Nice video.. Clear and concise. Can you make a video on how to integrate QoS with Load Balancing (PCC) with a theory explaining how it works?

  • @GlenKowalchuk
    @GlenKowalchuk8 ай бұрын

    Thanks again Martins 👍😎

  • @user-wy2ys7eo8j
    @user-wy2ys7eo8j Жыл бұрын

    视频说的很详细,👍

  • @Mensan1960
    @Mensan196010 сағат бұрын

    The issues I have with these setups are: 1) most ISP's I deal with are issuing dynamic IP addresses, so you can't use static routes in the routing tables. 2) Since the ISP device is almost always local, just pinging the local address does no good for a connection outage. You need to ping a REMOTE device to check connectivity. I haven't seen any of these videos address these issues.

  • @compratecno
    @compratecno3 ай бұрын

    excelent explanation.

  • @WanFiITSoLuTioNs
    @WanFiITSoLuTioNs7 ай бұрын

    very informative. next discussion about policy based routing. please

  • @SoranEngineer
    @SoranEngineer Жыл бұрын

    good explanation thank you so much

  • @ifscale3
    @ifscale310 ай бұрын

    Thank you for this video. You have explained a lot of information very clearly. In the MikroTik wiki on PCC, there are *accept* rules in the prerouting chain for traffic from the LAN destined to connected WAN subnets. These rules are placed before the PCC rules and are meant to prevent a routing loop. Can someone help me understand how these accept rules prevent a routing loop? Which traffic from the LAN to the WAN interface subnets will match these rules?

  • @evgeniyloginov
    @evgeniyloginov Жыл бұрын

    nice manual, thanks!

  • @Rouly88
    @Rouly88 Жыл бұрын

    😊 un pur bonheur. Very cool. Enjoy myself

  • @jakubstajner5155
    @jakubstajner5155 Жыл бұрын

    Nice video! Is there any chance to export finished config (RSC or plaintext) and place it somewhere, that anyone can review it? I have done this setup few years ago, but it was quite buggy... probably I had bad PCC values.

  • @leratoradebe6438
    @leratoradebe6438 Жыл бұрын

    Awesome!!!

  • @alimibrahem8120
    @alimibrahem8120 Жыл бұрын

    So elegant..!

  • @robertkirwan29
    @robertkirwan2911 ай бұрын

    Great video, is there a simple way using Mangle to force traffic from a specific local ip to use ISP1 as a priority?

  • @burimbajraktari
    @burimbajraktari Жыл бұрын

    Great video thanks. A question why you didnt used the Pasthrough option?

  • @truongsi1
    @truongsi110 ай бұрын

    Thanks about this videos. If i want to setup 8 isp loadbalacing on CCR2004. What can i do ?

  • @sabujplays1611
    @sabujplays16113 ай бұрын

    Best helpful video for me... Thanks 🫡👍

  • @mikkio5371
    @mikkio5371Ай бұрын

    Weldone and nice . Lengthy but worth it

  • @donakpabio
    @donakpabio9 ай бұрын

    Great video! I have a question, what happens when we have a BGP connection with the 3 ISPs?

  • @KP_187
    @KP_1874 ай бұрын

    Martins this is a really helpful video, thank you! I have just configured my RB4011iGS+ with to ISP connection following your tutorial and all is working perfectly! I just wanted to ask you something?! I have already setup 5 VLAN-s under the Bridge Port to this RB4011iGS+ router! I also added ether1-ISP1 and ether10-ISP2 at the WAN Interface List and at the NAT side > Chain: srcnat > Out Interface List: WAN > Action: masquerade! Hope this is a good configuration! My question is: At @10:21, the mark new connection from LAN... Am I supposed to choose All VLAN as In Interface? Thanks in Advance!

  • @GixD_
    @GixD_8 ай бұрын

    best tutorial 😁

  • @Silverblade655
    @Silverblade6557 ай бұрын

    Thanks for the video, really comprehensive although I don't understand two things. It does not divide the bandwidth but the packets, if I have two connections, one fast and one slow with sim that I keep as failover what is the best strategy to make it use as little as possible? Second, tried and it works but wireguard vpn works if I ping from router but not from my pc for example, any debugging tips? Thanks!!!

  • @suadiadnya
    @suadiadnya Жыл бұрын

    nice tutor i'm mikrotik user from indonesia , gbu

  • @kirksteinklauber260
    @kirksteinklauber2609 ай бұрын

    Thanks but I have an scenario and a question: How can use PPC if I want Primary and Standby scenario? For example broadband of 200 Mbps as primary and LTE as backup only? Also as my uplink is directly to a local cable modem and 3rd party LTE router the WAN port of my Mikrotik can be up but the Internet can be down. Don’t do require here to do recursive routing? And if so how can I do it when my ISP gives my WAN IPs only via DHCP in my router instead of static routes? Thanks and great video!

  • @toolsanddrymaller
    @toolsanddrymaller2 ай бұрын

    thank you 😊

  • @aeronstone100
    @aeronstone10011 ай бұрын

    Great Video, I tried with my dual ISPs and while speed wise it seems to be working. I am getting 50% packet loss. Any help?

  • @fayron_global
    @fayron_global11 ай бұрын

    ❤👍💪

  • @hexatested
    @hexatested11 ай бұрын

    Mark connection rules also mark the ospf connection which use multicast address. I would suggest to accepting routing related connection before marking for load balance or incoming connection into router.

  • @samaelfront2848
    @samaelfront28487 күн бұрын

    thank you👻

  • @synapticaxon9303
    @synapticaxon930311 ай бұрын

    Can you support MPTCP that is targeting an Internet endpoint (e.g. AWS EC2 instance)?

  • @glrfi4eva
    @glrfi4eva9 ай бұрын

    1. How do you ensure interconnects maintain the correct gateway (say the router has 2 WANs and 2 other private networks (for interconnecting to the LAN of another router (B)), it sends and receives traffic for, i.e. a PC network isolated that needs a server under in the A routers LAN, so pass between LAN ports (router B has a DHCP lease in RouterA's LAN) ), I assume as they are not in the LAN bridge they will default to the "main" route table? 2. How do route table routes work if the correct gateway in not in the table, can they jump to the "main" table if no entry? Or just fail?

  • @user-uo9km9dh3v
    @user-uo9km9dh3v10 ай бұрын

    Thank you for the video, it`s very helpful! Please can you make the video for Queues with Multiple uplinks?

  • @OperKH
    @OperKH Жыл бұрын

    What about FastPath\FastTrack should it be disabled?

  • @user-jm4uc6op7p
    @user-jm4uc6op7p Жыл бұрын

    Thanks

  • @cuddlelab6640
    @cuddlelab66409 ай бұрын

    great video, btw miktotik ip cloud not responding in multiple wan, what should i do?

  • @collinsonyegbado309
    @collinsonyegbado3092 ай бұрын

    Thanks for the video How can I use mangle rule to route http,SSL,smtp and pop 3 traffic's to isp1 while the other traffice will go to isp2

  • @XtrAMassivE
    @XtrAMassivE8 ай бұрын

    This is a great video, thank you. But I have one ISP with 1GB uplink and other with 50MB uplink. There are certain services (VOIP) that have to operate over the ISP2. What's the best way of load balancing this? Do I need to make hundred mange rules? Should I just create a separate routing rule for the VOIP subnet to only use ISP2? I would appreciate any advice, I'm still kinda new to this.

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    8 ай бұрын

    Instead of using PCC, look into other methods of filtering out VOIP traffic.

  • @pablorepolles
    @pablorepolles9 ай бұрын

    Thanks Martins - it has helped me a lot to understand how mikrotik works to balance connections. I have a question - If the ISP2 router is turned off for example. Will the connection marking rules continue to mark new connections that are assigned to "ISP2.conn" by counter and therefore would be lost? Thank you

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    9 ай бұрын

    Like the video says, when ISP2 goes down, main routing table will be used, meaning - the route with the lowest distance will be used which in our case was ISP1. Nothing will be lost, that is the whole point of this setup. So that it always works.

  • @erwinbolasa1524
    @erwinbolasa1524 Жыл бұрын

    Can you provide video on load balancing with Hotspot?

  • @rachidrac1759
    @rachidrac17599 ай бұрын

    درس جد رائع و واضح ... كيف يمكن معالجة الأمر مع الموجه من نوع أجهزة التأرجح في التحميل و او دمج ثلاث خطوط مختلفة tenda ax 3000 w30e له واجهة جد مختصرة و لا تتيح فسحت الاستفادة من مؤهلاته رغم كونه يتضمن ثلاث منافذ من فئة wan/lan و واحدة من فىة lan mtu بين 1400 إلى 1500 أنوه بجهودكم العلميو على جهودكم الفاضلة

  • @semtex6412
    @semtex6412 Жыл бұрын

    Hi experts! first of all, thank you bigtime for this video. now my concern is i'm not able to find Routing Table option from the Routing menu in my CCR1036. im pretty sure it's because im only using RouterOS 6.48.6. upgrading to Version 7 at this point would be very risky as this router is already in production. might i humbly ask how to go about going through this tutorial with RouterOS v6.48.6? enlighten me oh, wise ones!

  • @alexzanderpurwoko1018

    @alexzanderpurwoko1018

    11 ай бұрын

    Upgrade the firmware and update winbox to latest version would help you Be carefull on you upgrade

  • @bonamin
    @bonamin Жыл бұрын

    I will look at this later with a clear mind. I am using an LHG-LTE18 as my internet Modem/Router, but I've also bought an RB5009 for this exact purpose. I wanted to buy a second LHG, and have them both feed the connetion to the RB and the RB serve as my main Router. I wanted to do that because when using 4G in my country and with my ISP you have to options. Either use "vpn" APN or the normal one. VPN gives you a public IP (like ADSL for example) but limits bandwidth to 150Mbps. Normal APN puts you behind a NAT (CG-NAT) effectively removing your ability to port forward anything inside, but gives you Full Speed. I wanted to combine two lines, with two seperate 4G SIMS, on two LHG-LTEs. But it's SO HARD setting up these things since RouterOS is so complicated (in order to be detailed and powerful), and the community on Mikrotik Forums didn't really help me much, as from what I've seen, they don't really like noobs. :) Currently my RB5009 is just a brick sitting in my closet :( Anyway, will check the video later and maybe I can find more info on how to set my net up.

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    Did you manage to find a solution?

  • @bonamin

    @bonamin

    Жыл бұрын

    ​@@mikrotik No. I had no time to look further into it. I need to gather information that is scattered around because I'm not an expert on the subject. The problems I face mainly are: 1) I was told by Mikrotik specialists that if I put the LTE18 on "Passthrough" mode, I should have setup a VLAN for management. 2) I then need to figure out the rest of the setup so the RB works as a Router and the LTE18 machines work as Internet supliers only. Anyway, the problem as I said, is that I didn't have the time to look THAT DEEP into the matter. My LHG-LTE18 is super fast as it is. I just wanted to make my VoIP phone work as well. :(

  • @momensobhy2929
    @momensobhy29294 ай бұрын

    Thank you for the awesome tutorial. However, I really need guidance on how to implement NTH load balancing in RouterOS v7. I've tried numerous times but something always goes wrong. Could you please provide any information or resources on how it works? Thank you.

  • @Q4best
    @Q4best9 ай бұрын

    Nice job. But local ruting table will not work?

  • @joel19622
    @joel1962211 ай бұрын

    Hi,how about load balance configuration with same gateways it is the same procedure? If not then how? Thanks

  • @iliondocs6006
    @iliondocs600610 ай бұрын

    i have an Mikrotik hAP ax lite LTE6. I have convert the ether1 port as WAN port and ether 2,3,4 and wifi remains in bridge-LAN. I would like to configure the router in order to use with load balancing between LTE connection and ether1 WAN connection (for example i am in a hotel, i plug the router in my ether1 connection but i want to use LTE also in combination). I tried to follow the tutorial but failed because i dont know the IP addresses of the gateway for LTE and the gateway of the WAN in ether1 changes from one trip to another. Is there a permanent solution, configuration that i can use? thanks for the videos

  • @Garen15
    @Garen153 ай бұрын

    Great video, got it working with two WAN connections. my only problem now is the router itself does not have internet, ping outside shows "No route to host". anyone has any ideas?

  • @muzaffarbashir4566
    @muzaffarbashir456610 ай бұрын

    I want to configure two isp pannels data and want assign user as per my wish service 1 or service 2

  • @19HOKAGE68
    @19HOKAGE68 Жыл бұрын

    how about with failover and hotspot?

  • @salembaabbad8783
    @salembaabbad8783 Жыл бұрын

    Can i use this method in version 6.48.7 ?

  • @LiveGoodDreamers
    @LiveGoodDreamers6 ай бұрын

    Can this config be applicable on the same IP gateway ?

  • @colab6181
    @colab618110 ай бұрын

    Good day Martins, I am struggling to configure Mikrotik Router. I am using Pfsense as firewall with PPPoE and multiple VLAN's. I want to deploy Mikrotik at client homes that will have SSID for PPPoE and SSID for VLAN interface that is our hotspot. Can you please guide

  • @jozsefmolnar6179
    @jozsefmolnar61799 ай бұрын

    It's looks like good, but what about IP/Firewall/NAT/masquerade action? I think, it's missing from the steps!

  • @sinuzxsinuzx9596
    @sinuzxsinuzx95966 ай бұрын

    Thx! Really good? 👍

  • @lasepp
    @lasepp Жыл бұрын

    How can we do the default route part dynamically in ROS7? I‘ve had the problem that sometimes the IP of the default gateway changes on reconnect via PPPoE… in ROS6 I could do that with a route filter in dynamic-in and change the routing table there. Is there a non-scripting way to do this in ROS7?

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    For VPN you simply specify the VPN tunnel name as the gateway, not the nexthop IP address.

  • @skynetoffice3632

    @skynetoffice3632

    10 ай бұрын

    @@mikrotik This configurations can load balances the multi wans without routing tables?

  • @teeay8324
    @teeay83248 ай бұрын

    i tried this and multi wan works, i just found something, that when i use this type of firewall mangle, for some reason my hotspot > captive portal popup is not working /showing. after disabling this and tried the diff pcc approach, the hotspot captive portal pop ups automatically. why is that? should i add more configuration on firewall for the hotspot?

  • @UlrichWessendorf
    @UlrichWessendorf Жыл бұрын

    Very nice video, but what if I get on all connections IP´s and Gateways dynamically via DHCP, how can I prepaire the needed Routing tables? That´s unfortunaltly the critical point in using more than one ISP here in Germany.

  • @UlrichWessendorf

    @UlrichWessendorf

    Жыл бұрын

    @@geogmz8277 Could you give me the headline of the forum title? The forum itself is well known, but it's hard to find something without knowing details🙂

  • @davidcraddock6474

    @davidcraddock6474

    Жыл бұрын

    @@geogmz8277 Would be very interested in this as well..

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    As mentioned in the video, this video was about PCC method and we did not configure things like DHCP server, NAT, firewall, users, etc. You can not dynamically adjust routes in differnet routing tables automatically based on the DHCP client. But it is very easy to write a script on the DHCP client which simply updates the route when gateway changes (help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/DHCP#DHCP-LeaseScriptExampleLeasescriptexample). However, thank you for the inspiration. We will see if we can convince our developers to allow doing this dynamically in the upcoming RouterOS releases. :)

  • @JPMeijers
    @JPMeijers2 ай бұрын

    This is nice, but how do one do this if the WAN interfaces use DHCP?

  • @maxpain177
    @maxpain1777 ай бұрын

    What about NAT (masquerade)?

  • @dpgdigit
    @dpgdigit Жыл бұрын

    The video state that there is 3 differents connections. static, dhcp, pppoe but then later @ 5:30 route to static GW are added. Usualy with dynamic IP ISP (dhcp or pppoe) you also have dynamic GW. I'd like to see the workaround there. Recursive route ? scheduled script ? dhcp client script ?

  • @dpgdigit

    @dpgdigit

    Жыл бұрын

    Because we don't know the GW IP, we can not create route @ 5:30. This script will do that dynamicaly { :local rtable "ISP1" :local count [/ip route print count-only where comment=$rtable] :if ($bound=1) do={ :if ($count = 0) do={ /ip route add check-gateway=ping gateway=$"gateway-address" routing-table=$rtable comment=$rtable } else={ :if ($count = 1) do={ :local test [/ip route find where comment=$rtable] :if ([/ip route get $test gateway] != $"gateway-address") do={ /ip route set $test gateway=$"gateway-address" } } else={ :error "Multiple routes found" } } } else={ /ip route remove [find comment=$rtable] } }

  • @jeytis72
    @jeytis724 ай бұрын

    Can it also be considered as a failover setup? Thanks

  • @davidcampos8795
    @davidcampos8795 Жыл бұрын

    Would this still dynamically route traffic if an ISP loses Internet but the ISP gateway is still ping able? Ping seems like an unreliable way to determine if a route is down because here in the states the gateway is usually an ISP modem device and that never goes down but you'll lose Internet

  • @nick9323

    @nick9323

    Жыл бұрын

    Yep, it will. Google pdf "Monitoring the Internet Connections of WAN Links with Only Routing Configuration", it's has and example of your needs

  • @peterkovacs233

    @peterkovacs233

    Жыл бұрын

    you can check a gateway internet connection with recursive routes. This is what you looking for.

  • @CaMapTrang

    @CaMapTrang

    Жыл бұрын

    you are right (Y) , on the os7 router you can check fail the port connected to the BFD instead of using the very inaccurate Ping ! my video at 28:11

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    Yes, then the route would be still active. However, this video was not about that. It seems that this is the solution that you are looking for - help.mikrotik.com/docs/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26476608

  • @k0nctant1n.pererva
    @k0nctant1n.pererva8 ай бұрын

    I set it up a long time ago. Everything would be fine, but I discovered that the connection to the router is ISP2 (the router page does not open). The connection is marked ISP1. Help

  • @user-comet7664
    @user-comet76647 ай бұрын

    Can PCC load balancing be achieved without NAT,DHCP? I have an existing router that handles NAT and DHCP. I am considering introducing PCC load balancing in front of this router to increase bandwidth

  • @bricbrac
    @bricbrac2 ай бұрын

    Can this setup be hardware offloaded on the CCR2116 ? Does it supports multiple routing tables? Or will it be at least partially offloaded?

  • @luis-bejarano
    @luis-bejarano5 ай бұрын

    how would you chnge this config to only use the secondary ISPs when the ISP1 is down?

  • @rgzeper8061
    @rgzeper8061 Жыл бұрын

    Hi Guys I have a difficulty on having internet connection with your config. I already double checked the config but it seems my computer cant get internet connection without configuring masquerade on the NAT. Is that right or I miss something.? I also want to have a port forwarding rule as you mentioned in the last portion of the video but it seems the port cant be open. hopeful for your reply.

  • @radenrohmatulloh

    @radenrohmatulloh

    11 ай бұрын

    Right. You should configure masquerade on NAT fisrt. I think in the video was already has masquerade config in each port from isp

  • @user-ir9ux1nu2e
    @user-ir9ux1nu2e2 ай бұрын

    Setting up a multivan for the Internet is not a problem. But if the task is to create a VPN tunnel through each provider where the static IP is only on one side, then there is a problem. Can Mikrotik balance VPN? I tried to set it up for a long time, but the multivan and 1 tunnel did not move. Is there information on how to implement balancing of VPN tunnels between the main office and the branch? I'm trying to configure everything on wireguard.

  • @mikkio5371
    @mikkio5371Ай бұрын

    i got it from your mikotik help page : " PCC is not a valid method, in case of Hotspot(captive portal) - due to the fact that Hotspot uses web-proxy and it uses only the default routing table, at the moment. " is this statement still valid as of today ? and if yes what other method best suit load balancing for hotspot . ECMP or policy base routing . which ?

  • @dhiaahmed5420
    @dhiaahmed5420 Жыл бұрын

    What if I want to configure recursive route as my modems aren't configured as bridge 🤔

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    No problem, just do it, this was just one example of the idea how to make it work. Anyone is free to get inspired from the video and make adjustments. This is basically the step one, then the sky is the limit.

  • @ebenolivier
    @ebenolivier2 ай бұрын

    At about 5:30 you add the route tables to the route list. What I do not understand is that you give each one an immediate Gateway address, but seeing that one of the ISP's is dynamic how can you know the gateway address?

  • @hlbindonesia3547
    @hlbindonesia35478 ай бұрын

    veryyyyyyy simple only use table mode to result loadbalance 3 isp thanks broohhhhhh

  • @beelzebub8626
    @beelzebub86263 ай бұрын

    What is the difference between using pcc "scr address and port" and "both address and port"? Thanks

  • @olpchk1115
    @olpchk111510 ай бұрын

    Still can't manage to make it working without that main route. It looks like those ISP table and route mark are just ignored

  • @alexeysmotrov
    @alexeysmotrov6 ай бұрын

    When you selecting In. Interface for the 3rd group of rules you select LAN. Is this the name of your bridge?

  • @TheDoblink

    @TheDoblink

    4 ай бұрын

    I think so

  • @Stratocastoras
    @Stratocastoras Жыл бұрын

    Nice video but one question, what if we had 3 pppoe isp connections on the same router?

  • @nick9323

    @nick9323

    Жыл бұрын

    I have 2 pppoe on the same router, no problem. In pppoe client there is Default route distance parameter

  • @MikroTikBlog_com

    @MikroTikBlog_com

    Жыл бұрын

    To enable connectivity for a third internet source, consider adding identical rules and replacing the value '2' with '3' in the connection classifier tab.

  • @mikrotik

    @mikrotik

    Жыл бұрын

    We already had, in the video. ISP3 was PPPoE VPN. With VPN you simply specify VPN inteface name as a gateway, if the remote address tend to change.

  • @Stratocastoras

    @Stratocastoras

    29 күн бұрын

    @@mikrotik I know its been a while but lately when using the interface name ex pppoe-out1 or ISP1, i do not get internet access but when using ISPs network address which indeed is changing the internet access works. It has to do with pinging the gateway but if i turn that of failover does not work

  • @ArthursHD
    @ArthursHD8 ай бұрын

    How to add weight to ISP? One of ISPs is 2x faster than the other.

  • @fiberlitnetworks
    @fiberlitnetworks2 ай бұрын

    will this work on radius?

Келесі