Thanks for sharing this valuable knowledge with your clear and fantastic explanations.

Thank you very much for the excellent presentation. Very good video! I have a question. At 13:37: shouldn't it be "The odds of being *unemployed* rather than in employment are 42% lower for women than for men"?

@asadyare3268

6 ай бұрын

You are right.

Thank you so much for such a good explanation!

I'm doing a master's program in the US and my professor just explained this concept and I was so confused. Today's my test and this video makes my understanding of MN logistic regression so much better than it was. Thank you!

@kaynkayn9870

9 ай бұрын

"Today's my test" - certified uni student moment

Thank you for this very helpful video!

Good explanation of multinomial logistic regression.

Thank for sharing Dr

Thank you🙏

Thank you very much!

hello, what if, instead of the dependent variable being more than 2, you have the explanatory variable rather to be more than 2. example; how sitting technique (upright, bent and curled) impacts the shape of the spinal cord. can you help with the impact model that'll be ideal for this analysis?

Thanks for sharing

Thanks !

What's the explanation for that equation on slide 13:26 ? The logit scale which is used first is ln(x/(1-x)) = y, if I am not wrong so x = e^y / (1 + e^y), you say that you've used the odd scale values but you used the logit scale values, during the calculation of the percentages ?

Thanks for the presentation, which values of x did you use

The sliste at arounnd 13:22 have the same text for both bullets: I believe the second bullet should read "The odds of being unemployed rather than in employment are 42% lower for women than for men"

@clausvind8010

Жыл бұрын

slide not sliste

@time line 13.23 the second interpretation should be unemployment rather than in employment.

Mlogit depvar indepvar, rrr gives OR output instead of coefficients

Mycket bra!

Why the numerator of pi3 is 1 as the reference category?