Multicopters Take Flight | Intel

Ғылым және технология

The Volocopter VC200 made aircraft history on March 30, 2016 as the first certified multicopter to fly with a person onboard. Designed by German company e-volo, this electric aircraft gives people a glimpse into a future where, one day, travel may exist above street traffic. “The Volocopter is super easy to fly, silent and built with electrical simplicity compared to helicopters, which are difficult to fly, loud and mechanically complex,” said Jan Stumpf, CEO of Ascending Technologies, an Intel company that has worked with e-volo since 2013.
Technology developed by Ascending Technologies enabled the flight controls, motor electronics and key elements that extend multi-rotor UAV technology to this new type of aircraft.
Special thank you to e-volo for sharing this video. Learn more about the company here: volocopter.com/
Subscribe now to Intel on KZread: intel.ly/3IX1bN2
About Intel:
Intel, the world leader in silicon innovation, develops technologies, products and initiatives to continually advance how people work and live. Founded in 1968 to build semiconductor memory products, Intel introduced the world's first microprocessor in 1971. This decade, our mission is to create and extend computing technology to connect and enrich the lives of every person on Earth.
Connect with Intel:
Visit Intel WEBSITE: intel.ly/Intel
Follow Intel on TWITTER: intel.ly/Twitter
Follow Intel on INSTAGRAM: intel.ly/Instagram
Follow Intel on LINKEDIN: intel.ly/LinkedIn
Follow Intel on TIKTOK: intel.ly/TikTok
Multicopters Take Flight | Intel
/ intel

Пікірлер: 200

  • @casey360360
    @casey3603603 жыл бұрын

    The mechanic for rotation on the vertical axis is freaking awesome! Mounting the props at different angles, slowing props that sit at certain angles while speeding up props of opposing angle. Absolutely brilliant.

  • @filmcarsetc

    @filmcarsetc

    2 жыл бұрын

    What does intel have to do with tho?

  • @OussamaErraji
    @OussamaErraji8 жыл бұрын

    People wondering about why such an Idea: the main reason being easier control. Helicopters are very difficult to pilot and with a machine like this all the job is done by the software running the electronic control of the rotors. All you have to do is to intuitively control the lever, the rest is done by the control units.

  • @verybang

    @verybang

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Oussama Erraji Yes, if the final build goes faster than 5mph

  • @TheFishCostume

    @TheFishCostume

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Oussama Erraji Also, multiple rotors like this offers much higher redundancy. If one rotor fails, you still have seventeen more.

  • @Dasmaster1

    @Dasmaster1

    8 жыл бұрын

    As opposed of having the computer control a normal helicopter?

  • @xponen

    @xponen

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Das Neko why don't they? My guess is; out-dated tech.

  • @Dasmaster1

    @Dasmaster1

    8 жыл бұрын

    xponen Out-dated tech? Such as what?

  • @LoretaiMods
    @LoretaiMods8 жыл бұрын

    wow such an exciting flight........ GJ grannycopter

  • @cheddarcheese
    @cheddarcheese7 жыл бұрын

    “The Volocopter is super easy to fly, silent and built with electrical simplicity" I think their definition of silent different than mine.

  • @clintonlamm7198

    @clintonlamm7198

    6 жыл бұрын

    I. Would like to own one. How much does it cost

  • @gfdia35

    @gfdia35

    5 жыл бұрын

    What's this silent nonsense, none of the human sized drone style copters are even close to silent

  • @casey360360

    @casey360360

    3 жыл бұрын

    Compared to a traditional turbine powered helicopter? This is silent.

  • @mariobeans
    @mariobeans7 жыл бұрын

    crazy to think someone might build one with true fpv racing controls.

  • @leonardomena6321
    @leonardomena63217 жыл бұрын

    me acuerdo cuando andaban asiendo las primeras pruebas felisidades. chingon

  • @SKRUBL0RD
    @SKRUBL0RD5 жыл бұрын

    nice ROFLCOPTER

  • @DavidSmith-ox4tu
    @DavidSmith-ox4tu5 жыл бұрын

    Having worked on the first revision of the ISC (Intel Server Control) and validating the sensory component instrumentation software it makes me wonder how the control unit and the hardware interface operates.

  • @geraldharper330
    @geraldharper3307 жыл бұрын

    Awesome. It seems that we only need better batteries.. Nice flight

  • @sharanara
    @sharanara8 жыл бұрын

    Intel is awesome. AMD is awesome. Nvidia is awesome. Everything is awesome

  • @akargcoldworld6757
    @akargcoldworld67578 жыл бұрын

    Carbon neutral, cool, on the right track

  • @scharlackrenan
    @scharlackrenan8 жыл бұрын

    CONGRATULATIONS!!

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson2 жыл бұрын

    Now they need to bring up the lateral speed to at least 80 mph.

  • @marcosmedeiros2552
    @marcosmedeiros25526 жыл бұрын

    Tecnologia inovadora para um futuro melhor ..

  • @mattleading9888
    @mattleading98888 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant Chaps thats epic!!

  • @householdnamenyc
    @householdnamenyc6 жыл бұрын

    Congratulations on this record-setting flight! 'Democratizing flight' is a visionary goal; one that will radically change the future of commuting.

  • @debojitkakoti8021
    @debojitkakoti80218 жыл бұрын

    nice i like this design

  • @ShahHarsh1999
    @ShahHarsh19996 жыл бұрын

    This is inspire me and proud to being Electronics and communication Engineer

  • @daisyduck8593
    @daisyduck85936 жыл бұрын

    Why 18 engines (copters): Security! It is more secure than a double-4-copter (8 engines) or double-hexa-copter (12 engines).

  • @fredyactionpro
    @fredyactionpro7 жыл бұрын

    Hi, Hwo is the of soud track pleace?

  • @NedvigimostSpain
    @NedvigimostSpain8 жыл бұрын

    Muy bien!

  • @111danish111
    @111danish1116 жыл бұрын

    How long does the battery last ?

  • @ellemar1614
    @ellemar16148 жыл бұрын

    soundtrack?

  • @zakirullah4088
    @zakirullah40886 жыл бұрын

    Its superb.

  • @TheRealNashvilleLimo
    @TheRealNashvilleLimo7 жыл бұрын

    I love it, but if you lose one engine, your done, and no chance of auto-rotation, or any dead stick glide-ratio... is there a parachute like on a cirrus? I mean it's super cool, but with all those little engines that depend on each other for stability aren't you just increasing your chances for a point of failure? I understand you would not be if you lose one, and the other can off-set such a loss, so I am just wondering if anybody knows what is the minimum\maximum engine failures in which you can still maintain flight or even what you would do in CPU failure, as it seems that condition would be a big concern, as aerodynamically, this defies all basics of lift when those prop aren't turning, it becomes a rock. Please educated me?

  • @TedSeeber
    @TedSeeber5 жыл бұрын

    I am curious- what is the purpose of the tail cone?

  • @maskman4821
    @maskman48218 жыл бұрын

    awesome

  • @hemanthmadipalli6121
    @hemanthmadipalli61217 жыл бұрын

    superb brossssssssss

  • @code988yay
    @code988yay8 жыл бұрын

    I was half expecting it to go into hyperspace once it was high enough They should add a rocket thing on the Back hole to speed it up

  • @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755

    @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, but if they but a "rocket thing" on the back, it would just do front flips and crash, Genius.

  • @what5385

    @what5385

    4 жыл бұрын

    Permission to initiate warp speed

  • @RafaelHabegger
    @RafaelHabegger7 жыл бұрын

    12min fligh time max as dji?

  • @Sauerland39
    @Sauerland397 жыл бұрын

    25 Minuten Flugzeit sind nicht wirklich viel........bleibt zu hoffen, das die Akkus in Zukunft Leistungsstärker werden und sich somit die Flugzeit deutlich erhöhen wird........

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson2 жыл бұрын

    I fly this in MicroSoft Flight Simulator....so cool.

  • @camuri_negreira
    @camuri_negreira7 жыл бұрын

    Great! now to increase the autonomy.

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab63384 жыл бұрын

    #all awesome

  • @aybin.v.k9562
    @aybin.v.k95626 жыл бұрын

    Thanks

  • @rickhobson3211
    @rickhobson32114 жыл бұрын

    Wish we could have had this without the music.

  • @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553
    @thesaturdaytechchannelwith5538 жыл бұрын

    The benefits of this I believe would probably be as drones naturally calculate the geometry of the flight, it would mean the majority of the inflight mathematics can be done by a computer and therefore, as a result, the pilot only has to be focused on what and where he wants to go without additional inflight problems, a helicopter or even a plan/jet pilot would be concerned about, as you can clearly see the man demonstrating the model drone-copter has only got directional monitors, simple-to-use start up controls, radio and a joystick which makes this as easy to fly as it is effectively to drive a car (in terms of complexity, not functionality). I believe in contrast, that if this were to be commercially available there would have to be heavier regulation as if their were millions upon millions flying around in the these drone-copters due to accessibility and it would have to be taxed the same as a helicopter in my opinion as it's a legitimate mode of transport that would require many people nation or world wide in a much larger more connected air traffic control network and would be very complicated to manage. So yeah, I seem an indefinite future for this technolgy and if this becomes commercially available with the adequate regulation and management would be something of a transport based revolution!

  • @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553

    @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553

    8 жыл бұрын

    (Overwise in short, JUST HAVE MY MONEY NOW!).

  • @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553

    @thesaturdaytechchannelwith553

    8 жыл бұрын

    www.e-volo.com/index.php/en/kontakt-en/faq-en

  • @salmanrasuli8150

    @salmanrasuli8150

    7 жыл бұрын

    TheSaturdayTechChannel WithMusicAndGaming

  • @MRSKTHAKUR
    @MRSKTHAKUR8 жыл бұрын

    team work

  • @carlhopkinson
    @carlhopkinson2 жыл бұрын

    I WANT ONE!!!!

  • @RennieAsh
    @RennieAsh8 жыл бұрын

    The audio is very distracting and doesn't fit someone flying the thing at 2km/h and a rotation speed of 1 every 3 minutes ;p

  • @sapphires786

    @sapphires786

    8 жыл бұрын

    agreed! you must be into music or sound field to have pointed that ;)

  • @RennieAsh

    @RennieAsh

    8 жыл бұрын

    Sapphires7 interested in it yes :-) Haven't studied it "officially" though.

  • @hbarudi
    @hbarudi6 жыл бұрын

    Great concept being electric and all, but it can't go for more than a few miles before it says battery low. Looks like it is targeted to major cities that can use this to get around inside the city but never out of a city. Made out of fiber reinforced composite material that is lightweight and strong and has mass of 290kg and can carry 160kg on it. But we still don't have an electric helicopter with battery life that is comparable to a gas tank for a gas helicopter yet. I wish they continue this research until one such thing can be made.

  • @mohini656
    @mohini6562 жыл бұрын

    Yes, sheare it mix of my favorite. thanks. today.

  • @CarlyWaarly
    @CarlyWaarly8 жыл бұрын

    Would it not be more efficient to have the blades incorporated into the frame, not on top, it would also protect them.

  • @RennieAsh

    @RennieAsh

    8 жыл бұрын

    It's probably lighter and more stable (and cheaper) for what they wanted to do. Also considering the amount of motors this is probably a more rigid structure.

  • @foreverraining1522
    @foreverraining15227 жыл бұрын

    How does this thing create thrust?!

  • @carlhopkinson

    @carlhopkinson

    2 жыл бұрын

    By tilting the rotor assembly....just like in a helicopter.

  • @WhatEvaYsay
    @WhatEvaYsay8 жыл бұрын

    After reading thru all thse comment I still dun get why with all the rotors??

  • @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube

    @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube

    8 жыл бұрын

    to lift the weight. they are electric and not as powerful as petrol or diesel so they need more

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    Each rotor provides thrust and enough are required to lift the craft plus passengers, plus have enough in reserve to provide redundancy plus have enough in excess to provide control - so it move through wind/weather. Safety in numbers (redundancy) provides enough lift to maintain control if one or more motors fail, allowing a safe emergency landing. If you just had 4 motors/props and one fails, then you'd be screwed! Normally, you design a multirotor to provide twice the required thrust of the all-up weight (AUW).

  • @barrymccoy8353
    @barrymccoy83537 жыл бұрын

    Thomas Wilson this is for you!

  • @danielfuka7584
    @danielfuka75843 жыл бұрын

    Silly question, but isn't Airport ATC globally in English?

  • @1950Raman
    @1950Raman7 жыл бұрын

    If one fan fails, will the system remain afloat?

  • @ravieze
    @ravieze8 жыл бұрын

    how is this any better thanheli copters?

  • @kevlar8899
    @kevlar88996 жыл бұрын

    Music by????? (please)

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab63384 жыл бұрын

    Intelligente awesome

  • @pangkolmo
    @pangkolmo8 жыл бұрын

    The say UFO ain't true. Look you made one! :)

  • @dronbot3720
    @dronbot37205 жыл бұрын

    price?

  • @kurito_
    @kurito_8 жыл бұрын

    how long lasts the battery? or does it need fuel?

  • @TheFishCostume

    @TheFishCostume

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Combum It's electric.

  • @carlhopkinson

    @carlhopkinson

    2 жыл бұрын

    battery lasts about an hour.

  • @fidellouisfks2558
    @fidellouisfks25587 жыл бұрын

    good

  • @Mepulan
    @Mepulan8 жыл бұрын

    at first I read Yolocopter

  • @tabcreedence6553

    @tabcreedence6553

    6 жыл бұрын

    It's actually roflcopter

  • @nob0dy27_

    @nob0dy27_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Tab Creedence my roflcopter goes soi soi soi

  • @ilustrado7291
    @ilustrado72918 жыл бұрын

    What do you guys think would happen if 1 of the motors die? Perhaps a bird went through it or somethin

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    Redundancy allows for failed motors - thats why there are so many!

  • @ilustrado7291

    @ilustrado7291

    8 жыл бұрын

    Paul Atherton I see. That makes more sense.

  • @sharanara

    @sharanara

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Helium Punk (H3) Exactly. And just like in your car with how it has abs and sensors and stuff, it could increase a motors power to compensate.

  • @shravanshravan4402
    @shravanshravan44028 жыл бұрын

    its very dangerous, any single rotor failure can make it out of balance and even if you are using some balancing algorithm still it may be difficult to make an emergency escape for the pilot .

  • @einfachnurleo7099

    @einfachnurleo7099

    8 жыл бұрын

    ... I understand what you want to say, but what do you think happens if the same thing happens to a helicopter? If think you´ll be able to get this thing down save even if 2 rotos fail (they probably built in a few extra once just to be save)

  • @RennieAsh

    @RennieAsh

    8 жыл бұрын

    I think it could compensate quite well for one motor failing. The battery on the other hand...

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    I build multi-rotors, and even a hexacopter (6 rotors) can be controllable if a rotor fails - as long as its designed so that the remaining rotors are able to produce enough thrust - so its all down to design! No doubt the other electronics of a man carrying multi-rotor would have been designed with redundancy too, allowing for failure. Without variable (collective) pitch rotors a multi-rotor is disadvantaged in power loss situations, compared with traditional helis, so a lot more thought needs to be given to redundant systems.

  • @circleinfo

    @circleinfo

    7 жыл бұрын

    But it is much safer then a helicopter. If one rotor from a helicopter fails... Well then you can say goodbye to the world. Multicopters like these are programmed that the remaining ones are compensating the broken ones. One one side the will go faster on other side they will go slower. Even 5 rotors could break (not on the same side tho) and you can still landing safe.

  • @junoguten

    @junoguten

    6 жыл бұрын

    In a regular helicopter you have control of the angle of the blades, so in case of full engine failure and providing you're not too close to the ground you can unclutch and use the fall to spin up the rotors and then change the angle to generate lift right before you land.

  • @hbsharkman
    @hbsharkman6 жыл бұрын

    a helicopter with Meltdown?

  • @bhushanraymal9125
    @bhushanraymal91255 жыл бұрын

    Is running over electrical power

  • @manstaha
    @manstaha7 жыл бұрын

    how much is this selling for?

  • @Round_Death
    @Round_Death7 жыл бұрын

    Do a flip plz.

  • @SiapSiup
    @SiapSiup8 жыл бұрын

    But why ? Isnt normal helicopters good enough? I think that one strong rotor is better that few smaller. It seems like art for art.

  • @ltrodd

    @ltrodd

    8 жыл бұрын

    +cotytupocotytu Why? Lose an engine or 2 or 3 and your fine in this one, it's mechanically very simple so it requires very little maintenance, it's far cheaper to run, it's potentially far cheaper to build, the computer can precisely control rotors to make very simple flight controls rather than complex flight controls of regular copter, etc...

  • @RennieAsh

    @RennieAsh

    8 жыл бұрын

    Normal helicopter needs a tail for balance, is heavier, louder, more difficult to control - if something is slightly out of balance, helicopter self destructs.

  • @circleinfo

    @circleinfo

    7 жыл бұрын

    Even a kid could fly such multicopter. You simply need nearly no knowledge. Thats the whole point of this. Making a helicopter flying licence is hard as hell and takes extremly long time. With something like these you could simply fly to work.

  • @CarlyWaarly
    @CarlyWaarly8 жыл бұрын

    Can this float to the ground if the power or electronics fail?

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    Haha, like a brick floats!

  • @CarlyWaarly

    @CarlyWaarly

    8 жыл бұрын

    Auto rotation?

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    +CSMedia in autorotation on a standard helicopter, you have a variable (collective) pitch and the resistance if a huge mechanical gearbox to control the speed of descent. On a multirotor with no power the motor would provide no control whatsoever.

  • @CarlyWaarly

    @CarlyWaarly

    8 жыл бұрын

    Paul Atherton Thanks!

  • @SydneySewerat

    @SydneySewerat

    8 жыл бұрын

    the volocopter comes with a ballistic parachute for safety and aircraft protection, and is supposed to be more reliable than a helicopter so hopefully hardly ever needed.

  • @kaduoliveira2390
    @kaduoliveira23905 жыл бұрын

    Eu apenas acho que deveria haver um motor exclusivo para cada helice tornando o assim quase que zero a chance de possiveis acidentes porque em caso de pane de um outro daria sustentacao

  • @-cutekey2454
    @-cutekey24545 жыл бұрын

    maybe a car of the future

  • @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755
    @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba77554 жыл бұрын

    I would of flew that as high as he was flying it at 2:50 and jump out, literally! Since I'm 28 how would I die?

  • @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755

    @bluefireyoutubezxprofireba7755

    4 жыл бұрын

    I won't die since my bones are quite soft since I'm 13

  • @bryangracia8324
    @bryangracia83248 жыл бұрын

    This is The future?

  • @mariangeedow5005

    @mariangeedow5005

    6 жыл бұрын

    Tarkus of Catarina some l go. S

  • @leonardphilippgaffke2490
    @leonardphilippgaffke24908 жыл бұрын

    Ja toll.^^ Und wo ist bei diesem Ding jetzt der genaue Vorteil gegenüber einem gewöhnlichen Helikopter? Ich meine wozu das Rad neu erfinden? Für eine ernstgemeinte Antwort von den Erfindern oder Ihren Mitarbeitern wäre ich dankbar. Ich wäre sehr dankbar für eine detailgenaue jedoch trotzdem auch für Laien verständliche Erläuterung der Unterschiede dieser Technologie gegenüber dem herkömmlichen Helikopter. Aber bitte wirklich nur von Fachleuten die direkt an diesem Projekt beteiligt sind. Auf irgendwelche Klugscheißererklärungen von Möchtegernbescheidwissern lege ich keinen Wert.

  • @Sauerland39

    @Sauerland39

    7 жыл бұрын

    Du hast lediglich nur noch einen Joystick zum steuern und nicht so ne komplizierte Steuerung wie bei nem Hubschrauber...

  • @flooxz8653
    @flooxz86538 жыл бұрын

    Zeigt mir bitte mal einen sinnvollen Anwendungsfall für diesen Volocopter. Sinnvoller Anwendungsfall heißt, wo ich dem bisher verwendeten Konzept bei Drehflüglern gegenüber einen Vorteil habe. Bis jetzt kann ich ja leider nur Nachteil entdecken: Sehr geringe Flugzeit ( max. 30 Min), keine Möglichkeit einer Autorotation und geringe Zuladung. Wo bitte ist dieses Konzept denn inovativ?

  • @flooxz8653

    @flooxz8653

    7 жыл бұрын

    "In der Stadt" wird es auch für dieses Fluggerät keine Start- und Landeerlaubnis geben. Außer es ist ein Fluggerät zur Rettung von Personen und dafür reicht die Zuladung bei Weitem nicht aus. Vielleicht um Hunde und Katzen zur Notaufnahme zu transportieren sollte es ausreichen.

  • @ewed418
    @ewed4186 жыл бұрын

    this "drone" it's so easy to fly, easy like flight simulator :) that's the breakthrough

  • @thefrub
    @thefrub7 жыл бұрын

    If it's electric, why does it have an exhaust pipe like a normal chopper?

  • @nelsonwalker7105

    @nelsonwalker7105

    6 жыл бұрын

    It might be cooling fan exhaust for batteries

  • @junoguten

    @junoguten

    6 жыл бұрын

    They probably just took the body from a normal heli and cut off the tail.

  • @N8904V
    @N8904V8 жыл бұрын

    It does not go fast (Its slow). He does not fly it far.. It can't fly any higher then that?

  • @hatatehimekaidou7442
    @hatatehimekaidou74426 жыл бұрын

    Yolocopter

  • @fasteddieskustoms

    @fasteddieskustoms

    6 жыл бұрын

    lol

  • @erayzpr2677
    @erayzpr26777 жыл бұрын

    neden intel olduğunu bir daha anlıyoruz.

  • @samolet-legko
    @samolet-legko4 жыл бұрын

    Большой расход электроэнергии, требуются моторы большой мощности и аккумуляторы с большой ёмкостью и токаотдачей. И искусственный шум сильно мешает просмотру, дурацкая мода намеренно ухудшать качество звука и видео.

  • @dkilroy7037
    @dkilroy70374 жыл бұрын

    Hi Im working on a show about amazing machines for the BBC and would love to get permission to use this film in the show. Could you please provide me with an email address of the relevant person to speak to? Thanks.

  • @Intel

    @Intel

    4 жыл бұрын

    Hello! You can send your request to our Trademarks and Branding team at trademarks.and.brands@intel.com.

  • @huiyterts1503
    @huiyterts15038 жыл бұрын

    Wow. you made a helicopter not only pointless and more expensive than a ordinary heli... you also made a less efficient heli as well. but hey... good work???

  • @geertvisser6629

    @geertvisser6629

    7 жыл бұрын

    Huiy Terts i thought exactly the same thing XD

  • @jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301

    @jamesneilsongrahamloveinth1301

    6 жыл бұрын

    Looks potentially safer than an ordinary helicopter, more stable, easier to fly and cheaper to maintain. I guess that's a start . . .

  • @gusty_scarf

    @gusty_scarf

    5 жыл бұрын

    there also going to be used as taxis in major cities like New York, Singapore, Paris, Tokyo, and Berlin.

  • @emart687
    @emart6878 жыл бұрын

    Why is he scared to fly forward, what's the point of just hovering ?

  • @maxiecoates8108

    @maxiecoates8108

    8 жыл бұрын

    1st ever manned test of a non-mechanical helicopter probably has something to do with. You walk before you run.

  • @kayrxx7123
    @kayrxx71234 жыл бұрын

    AMD would need to use only 1 fan to fly...

  • @akshayrathore2882
    @akshayrathore28828 жыл бұрын

    I thought we passed the point of invention helicopter some 70 years back

  • @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube

    @xpeter123xplaysonyoutube

    8 жыл бұрын

    these are basiclly giant drones and they are quieter and lighter (read the description)

  • @akshayrathore2882

    @akshayrathore2882

    8 жыл бұрын

    Peters Games giant manned drones? so a helicopter basically.

  • @athertop

    @athertop

    8 жыл бұрын

    I we had given up further inovation after inventing the wheel, then you'd have a lovely set of wooden rims on your pimp up cart!

  • @circleinfo

    @circleinfo

    7 жыл бұрын

    Every person with hands could fly a multicopter like this without much knowledge. Do you also can say this about helicopters? I will visit you at your grave. On Top of that 5 rotors can break and you are still flying. What will happen if the one rotor of a helicopter will break?

  • @billjuhasz3875

    @billjuhasz3875

    7 жыл бұрын

    With the same electronics a regular helicopter would indeed be just as easy to fly. Try to fly a quad or "Volo" copter without fly by wire, gyro stabilized, GPS control, it would be essentially impossible. What makes this thing easy to fly is not the configuration, it's the computers. I also wonder if this thing has any ability to auto-rotate, as is required of all helicopters. Without auto-rotation capability this thing would fall like a stone if it ran out of power. A normal helicopter can land without power by using the "auto-rotating" blades to fly like an auto-gyro, I con't see how Volocopter would do this with the fixed pitched blades.

  • @muhnadalswidani9043
    @muhnadalswidani90435 жыл бұрын

    Volocopter ist geferlich

  • @yaglehoole5662
    @yaglehoole56626 жыл бұрын

    One look at the air frame and I can tell it was an over-engineered Deusche contraction.

  • @aksiiska9470
    @aksiiska94705 жыл бұрын

    Wie lange kann die Maschine in der luft bleiben? ein konventioneller Hubschrauber... leider gab es auf deutsch keine gescheiten ergebnisse uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090116125519AAAYK9f&guccounter=1

  • @ackkipfer
    @ackkipfer8 жыл бұрын

    This is not safe, i mean in a scenario on witch you lost let's say power, helicoperter and even gyrocopter have the ability to do AUTO-ROTATION, u can't do in here....not with that setup at least! Now, sure as hell it's way simple to pilot, no arguments on that! But any CPU could do that, no need for intel Xtreme some some something super powerfull.. not at all

  • @Astraphic
    @Astraphic8 жыл бұрын

    Why not just have a single rotor like a helicopter?

  • @cal1k

    @cal1k

    8 жыл бұрын

    Then you have to have the anti torque rotor and i think this is simpler in a sense that its all separate motors

  • @gunnntha

    @gunnntha

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Astraphic because of weight saving reasons, you'd have to have big and heavy parts of steel and other heavy materials. Like this you can spread the load evenly out. At least that's what I think haha. You're also losing weight because there's no need for a rear rotor and the long rod it is mounted on

  • @Astraphic

    @Astraphic

    8 жыл бұрын

    Fritzebommel Hans I agree, however it seems very very slow

  • @timothychung9265

    @timothychung9265

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Astraphic They probably have a limited area to test the helicopter on so it can't possibly go fast in a small area. But a problem with the multirotor is that it cannot auto rotate and land if one of the motor fails.

  • @BuGBurnout

    @BuGBurnout

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Astraphic YO DAWG I heard you like helicopters and we put rotors on your rotor.

  • @PatatjesDora
    @PatatjesDora8 жыл бұрын

    Forgot to unsub after the giveaway Kappa

  • @Fietsaap

    @Fietsaap

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Mario van Rooij Precies

  • @SandraMaraCarvalhodeMelo
    @SandraMaraCarvalhodeMelo8 жыл бұрын

    Friends Intel good morning in word is magnifique ,great is Project reality wonderful , a union of talent ,dedicate in all stages of creation and conclusion ,see and know a historia of creation of project ,a overcome and creative ,with simplicity and creative reach o promise ,Great with simplicity of control ,easy of duty and pratic where in minutes may fleat and reach in time ,Great for victoria ,and to be electric ,is fantastic , for future a evoluction is today for Intel and all that will invest ,and for future present ,all build have one space for transport and use with sure ,imagine with micro placa solar one possible fantastic ,imagine may do tranasport in short time mediction of place for ohers in rapid time. Friends imagine a possible of volocopter may help high fire of florest ,may use a easy motion for all side .,friends for future a possible may double in action pratic

  • @mostafasaadinasab6338
    @mostafasaadinasab63384 жыл бұрын

    #Designer#episode episode Full#dank vielen#Highlights#subskribe

  • @riyakadam1475
    @riyakadam14758 жыл бұрын

    lol that man can easily fall from the volocoptor no doors not a right design :/

  • @thayronyfernandes1301
    @thayronyfernandes13018 жыл бұрын

    #internetjusta

  • @sergiojew4828
    @sergiojew48288 жыл бұрын

    buyer ready too.. asap respond transfer money multi drones asap transfer to my LBC CORPORATE ACCESS

  • @barrymccoy8353
    @barrymccoy83537 жыл бұрын

    Leave it up to the Germans!

  • @thetaai8262
    @thetaai82625 жыл бұрын

    now all it need is a nuclear reactor and you can stay in the air for years

  • @slick4401
    @slick44017 жыл бұрын

    "...and then Hitler saw it and ordered it made to carry bombs. The end."

  • @chemukef6512
    @chemukef65128 жыл бұрын

    Seriously, what the point of this drone? You are to late, all industry have already done this kind of project to replace tourist plane, medical helicopter and ship in florida .you have the new electric drone solarpulse4000 by "technitron silicon" with 80 km autonomy which can carry 230 kg and speed 80 miles/h. you have to get only license car and get ready to fly.

  • @Lawi_Jake
    @Lawi_Jake8 жыл бұрын

    just German things

  • @erniep8214
    @erniep82144 жыл бұрын

    Pretty much nothing new, it is just a scaled up over the counter neighborhood drone product....

  • @josephmalkom9631
    @josephmalkom96317 жыл бұрын

    Looks really really stupid! 18 propellers to provide redundancy? - 8 would have been enough !and its very slow ! I think intel shoudl focus on the chips as every R&D that I have seen including their IOT is kind of stupid

  • @YouTubeSupportTeams
    @YouTubeSupportTeams6 жыл бұрын

    so how long do the batteries last? wasting money on useless tech

Келесі