great video. I am a practicing lawyer from Australia, this was great to see!

I enjoy the professor's feedback very much, thank you.

Thank you so much for sharing this video!

Thanks for the example. Lots of help

I have to examine my downs sister because she lied about me to the state. I’m sick to my stomach. I just need to ask two simple questions and she won’t lie. But I want to also prove her parental alienation symptoms and they incredible emotional abuse her agency inflicted as well as her care provider. Deeeeep breaths! God be with us. I want my sister back ❤️

Can an attorney refer to notes for questions or so jurors loose patience with that ?

Great Video im Studying Law here in the Philippines...

Why are these videos age restricted?

great piece

In Australia, a question that asks the witness why they’re here today might be seen as self-serving and therefore not a permissible question.

@Hear4Metallica

3 жыл бұрын

in the US it not only establishes capacity, but is allowable to set the table for the Jury. Obviously direct is pro witness (self serving).

Ms. Wilson is a good actress. She could be in movies. I hope she uses her powers for good.

@allanaforte450

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. :)

if there are no jury who do I ask her to introduce herself to

@ginellecalderon9255

9 жыл бұрын

thank you

@_.Leo_.

3 жыл бұрын

Bring puppets

@brendinapurilimaku1275

3 жыл бұрын

The court

@raine5675

3 жыл бұрын

the judge or the court

Great Help! Thank you very much.

woah man that lady is good! Thanks this will help me ALLOT!

@killeenboxingbrothers923

3 жыл бұрын

um is this real

At 0:22 you said "about the accident" that implies that her children's death was a accident therefor the person should not be ruled in any punishments because, it was just an accident

@davidkim5971

7 жыл бұрын

Good point.However, at any point it was MURDER because Rebacca Heartwill killed the woman's two sons.

@benjaminmiller7937

5 жыл бұрын

Calling something an "accident" isn't the same as calling it faultless. Accidents are a result of negligence.

"Did you go with them to the park?" 2:22 Is that a leading question?

@emmamorris3736

8 жыл бұрын

+Erika Wilson I love your voice its so soothing😜😍

@loveiseternity

6 жыл бұрын

It’s leading if there has not yet been mention of a park, as it suggests a fact that hasn’t been raised by the witness. If the witness has already referred to a park then it can form part of a looping question.

@allisson5790

5 жыл бұрын

No

@nationalistcanuck2877

5 жыл бұрын

Emma Morris That’s a different Erika buddy

@Scott-gt4xb

4 жыл бұрын

@@loveiseternity I don't know if that is the case, the question can be answered yes I went with them to the park, or no I didn't go with them to the park. "You went with them to the park?" is a leading question, but can be a looping question, or even a background question of immaterial or stipulated to facts.

is she on prosecution?

@allisson5790

5 жыл бұрын

Safa yes

Same

so good

I’m from Mrs.Abuzharia’s class

@zainabzaidi5016

5 жыл бұрын

Same, but are you allowed to write that?

Isn’t the witnesses answer to the question: where do you live? An objection on the grounds of non-responsive answer....???????

@Scott-gt4xb

5 жыл бұрын

Ya, it is non responsive, but who is going to object to that?

@medha7176

5 жыл бұрын

You always object the question asked by the attorney

@seanwaddell2659

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but also the entire line of questioning could be objected to on relevance and possible on prejudicing the jury against the defendant.

@poison1324

4 жыл бұрын

Sean Waddell thats what i was thinking, because she’s wasting time of the court. And I don’t personally think my opposing council or judge would like that.

@poison1324

4 жыл бұрын

Medha Srinath ummm, I don’t think so, you can also object witnesses as well. And it really helps if you know how to play with it.

A wonderful cross examination every law/bar student must hear.

@davidkim5971

7 жыл бұрын

Isn't it a direct examination?

@momodouy.m.sallah3956

7 жыл бұрын

You are right.

@momodouy.m.sallah3956

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Great

Did anyone tell you what happened? Objection hearsay

@nationalistcanuck2877

5 жыл бұрын

Scott Bernstein Fair enough, easy way to erase her statement about the car lol

@PapaArkansas870

4 жыл бұрын

Might be present sense impression.

@Scott-gt4xb

4 жыл бұрын

@@PapaArkansas870 Someone telling you happened is only present sense impression if they were saying what happened when they were perceiving it (e.g. talking to a 911 operator while you witness a robbery or someone leaving a house).

@PapaArkansas870

4 жыл бұрын

@@Scott-gt4xb Yes. So it would be admissible only if its established that the declarant perceived the event contemporaneously therewith.

@Scott-gt4xb

4 жыл бұрын

@@PapaArkansas870 so here, where the mother of the kids involved in the event is being asked did anyone tell you what happened (after the event occurred) there is no present sense impression hearsay exception. My objection would be sustained.

Did Ms. xxxx ever apologize to you? is it not an objectionable question? leading? thanks!

@loveiseternity

6 жыл бұрын

Rafael Allan it’s not leading because the witness already raised the issue of her apologising.

I had six kids. After the accident I have 5. WFT?

Good

Where were you when the children were killed?

Question : where did you lived ? Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other. If the Question would be by Juan Martinez : And where did you lived ? Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other. JM : Did I ask you how much that you had ? Or if your family was priceless? I asked you where did you lived !! Do you understand that? 😂 😂