Law of Evidence in criminal law,what a presentation with examples.we are indebted to you sir 👍

It is our previlage to be able to learn from such eminent jurists.

Great great & simply great....lovely argument by res sir in resent UP child murder & rape case ,...SC aqueted the accuse.....great argument ........

Thank you Sir. This lecture should be heard to students who appear exams on Evidence Act. Great presentation by Ld. Judge.

Honourable Justice gives an insightful explanation always

The lectures are most advanced and applied logic in interpretation of evidence law. Wonderful revelation of evidence law.

Amazing lecture, Thank you so much Mr. S. Nagamuthu sir.

Wonderful presentation, helps to understand the concepts easily.

Very nice sir

You are such great humanist having interest tech young advocates in India and I am one of them thank you . In fact I prepared a notes on your speech

@prakashkaramchandani7063

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Sir, it's so beautifully and elaborately explained , it cleared so many doubts of evidence act

He is a man down to earth. His classes are very good & lucid.

Senior Advocate and Justice Nagamuthu is a rear diamond as his name suggests.

@adv.radhakisanranhon1634

3 жыл бұрын

Dear sir most powerful speech evidence act thx .sirji

Truly informative and what a clarity of explanation .Great by his Lordship Justice S.Nagamuthu Sir

Much awaited clip. Thanks a ton, sir.

Kamal teacher hae, humble human hae... Sir, I can only say.

very good lecture. very useful, thank you Sir and Friday group.

Superb sir....thank u very much

Sir This video is very useful to every citizen thanks a lot

Great lecture. Excellent Sir. Its very useful for individual Advocates without practice under the senior like me.

Great experience Sir

Easy presentation of complicated subject. Thank you very much.

Thank you! Great insight

Genius sir.Thanks lots ji.Jai🇮🇳Hind.

Spiffing, your lecture is, my lord. Very useful

So well explained with lots of patience.!👍👍👍

Thank u Mr. Hon’ble Justice I watched ur superb lecture in the evidence Act,

@vijayakumarpoovar8890

4 жыл бұрын

There cannot be any presumption when courts accept the evidence of eye witnesses.

Grateful Sir

Sir is always Cristal clear

Thank you for addressing on judicial evidence

Great lecture... Most useful

I have no words to appreciate Justice(Retd) S Nagamuthu I would like to meet if possible

its wonderful 👏👏👏👏👏

Brilliant!!

Wow explained in lucid Manner....👍👍

Thank you, sir

Respected sir kindly make classes on criminal trial in cases in connection with warranty complaints and summary as well as with adduce evidence sections🙏

Exceptional sir

More and more lectures plz

Truely brilliant on Evidence Act

Excellent session sir

Wonderful

thanks a lot

Nice

Best lecture on evidence act

Very useful.The person coughing throughout the video is distrubing the entire session.😓

Excellent

Super

I am proud to say i am from his native place

Excellent lecture

"Proved." A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists.

🙏🙏🙏

Iyya vanakam one of my told about you i hardly trying to see u in supremcourt but i couldn't .

@muthumaniveeramuthu2381

6 ай бұрын

one of my friend told about you iyya

@muthumaniveeramuthu2381

6 ай бұрын

Always downtrodden peoplesuffered by dramatic and false evidence it may be domination of highercommunity to the lowercommunity

Brilliant

Someone was coughing in front of Mike which makes disturbance to hear the rule of law.

@wilsonrobithankayyan1547

3 жыл бұрын

1

Very nice sir from odisha

7.35-36.Is it u/s162 of Crpc, sir.

My favourite

Cough is a disturbance.

What is the import and impact of S 57(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?

Nice presentation, but failed to mention whether the section 133 prevails over the section 114(b) or not

Please keep lecture on cross examination

Sir

Please organise a lecture on why Uttar Pradesh which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad and nowhere else and why the litigants of West UP of 30 districts have been attached with Allahabad and not with Lucknow where there is a Bench which was just not needed as it is so close to Allahabad and nowhere else due to which the litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad to seek justice and this despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP and for which Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh recommended three HC Benches and yet not one created and for Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud and which already had multiple HC Benches was given one more at Aurangabad in 1985 but not a single for West UP or even for whole of Uttar Pradesh as recommended? Why lawless Bihar which is the home state of incumbent President of Supreme Court Bar Association Mr Vikas Singh has not even a single HC Bench? Kindly explain! My very best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate

Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर

Maaf ki

No wish of Them

Somebody is murmuring which is distracting