You do great videos but don't cut away from the play so quickly. Show enough so we see what the call is.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Thanks bro

@hospedajepr

Жыл бұрын

Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max.

@samobaraa

Жыл бұрын

@@hospedajepr I think your making nonsense up.

@hospedajepr

Жыл бұрын

@@samobaraa Sorry, I’m just an attorney. Still learning, have a nice day 😉

@JeffUr7

Жыл бұрын

​@Hospe Daje but the clips are longer then 5 seconds?

This is interesting to watch all these strange plays - but it would be nice to know what the final ruling is on some of these. Mostly, we never know.

@josephj.prioli1823

Жыл бұрын

yeah... i gave up 3 mins in... It was most unsatisfying

@brianarbenz1329

Жыл бұрын

Agree. This is too choppy and jumps from one to the next too quickly.

@lmlopez3682

11 ай бұрын

​@@brianarbenz13290

@neilhulands2426

8 ай бұрын

Totally agree, also can't assume every watcher knows what rules are being broken (eg what was Illegal about the pitch that hit the umpire). Title of video is Illegal moments, so I am assuming there is something not allowed in the play. To my understanding of baseball (which isn't much, I'm Australian and don't follow MLB) there is nothing wrong with the play, just the umpire being unlucky.

I love to see good umps not giving players a Hit-Batter call and even better calling Strikes on pitches when batters lean into them.

@lo1bo2

Жыл бұрын

I wonder if anyone has been hit by a pitch twice in one at bat after not being awarded first base the first time.

Don’t cut the clip so short. You’re leaving out the explanations of what happened.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Sorry bro Thanks for watching

@stevegabbert9626

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I didn't finish watching.

@Fly-The-W

11 ай бұрын

@@stevegabbert9626 Yeah between the title and how badly cut this is its unwatchable

@ross-carlson

9 ай бұрын

Yeah, sadly this made an otherwise cool video unwatchable.

This isnt a good video. You need to show what the rulings end up being for any of this to have any meaning whatsoever.

Please keep it going till we know what happened with rulings, awarded bases, etc.

I always love Scott Servais's look of irritation. It's one of the great things in baseball.

@Fit4C

Жыл бұрын

Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell

Many of these cuts are too quick. We can't necessarily tell what was called in each case. 1:17, for instance. Last thing we hear is "out at first", but there appears to have been obstruction on the catcher when the runner ran into his back as the pitcher went after the ball. Was that called?

That very first one was NOT....ABSOLUTELY NOT....a balk. That was a violation of the "detached equipment" rule. You can't use equipment (i.e., a face mask), detached from it's normal wear on your body to make a play on a live ball.

@skydiverclassc2031

Жыл бұрын

I'm not up on umpire mechanics, but apparently it's signed as a balk and charged to the pitcher as a balk, and the runners, if any, advance.

@viking956

Жыл бұрын

@@skydiverclassc2031 Actually the correct signal for a balk is a "delayed dead ball" whereas the signal for detached equipment is "dead ball". Most umpires don't know the difference.

@ericwildfong

3 ай бұрын

@@skydiverclassc2031 The point to the ground/catcher by the umpire is not the balk mechanic. You also don't kill play immediately for a balk, you need to let it play out. I believe if a runner successfully steals a base on a balk they don't get another base (but I could be wrong). The penalty for most defensive violations is runners advancing (since that's the only real negative the defence have), while for the offence it's a strike or an out. Sometimes you see balls awarded because of a violation by the defence (going to the mouth, and pitch clock rules come to mind) but much less common that base awards.

Let each clip run a lil longer so we can see what the exact rulings are. Good video

There was a couple plays where the incident happens off camera. Too many smash cuts and several it doesn't even say what the ruling was.

MLB interference calls are confusing. The runner has to allow defense to attempt a play, and defense can't get in the way of the runner. How does that work?

@OngakuSensei86

Жыл бұрын

For each play where there can be a play made on the ball, the closest umpire decides which defensive player is most likely, in their opinion, to make the play (99% of the time, this is an obvious choice). That player has right of way to fielding the ball, and even if their attempt to field the batted ball gets in the way of the runner, as long as they are in the act of fielding, the runner must avoid them. Any other fielder that gets in the way of the runner is committing obstruction, and once that fielder is no longer in the process of fielding the batted ball, and does not possess the ball, they must also clear out of the way of the runner or they will be committing obstruction.

@ericwildfong

3 ай бұрын

@@OngakuSensei86Even possessing the ball doesn't necessarily protect them from being called for obstruction. It's less likely since they'll likely be making a play on the runner, but still possible.

@screwthisin

3 ай бұрын

When players go out of their way in getting an obstruction/interference call, they should call the player out or the runner allowed to take the base. Ynoa was maybe a foot or two in the field of play maybe just off the base path and the player just reaches out and touches him and they call Ynoa for obstructing the runner.

@ericwildfong

3 ай бұрын

The standard is "hinders or impeeds" for obstruction and I believe also interference. Sounds like a case of type 2 or type B obstruction which isn't an automatic base award like type 1 or type A. Type 2 is protection to the base which in the umpires judgement would of been safely reached without the obstruction and the ball remains live. Advancing beyond this base can be done at the runners own peril (essentially "nullify the act" and only enforced if needed). Additionally per the rule book the base path only officially exists when there's a play being made on a runner, in all other cases they are essentially free to run where they want and technically it's up to the defence to avoid them.

These are being cut off way too fast! Can't tell what actually happened 🤷🏾‍♂️

Announcers need to know the difference between interference (offense) and obstruction (defense).

@Floydisgr8

Жыл бұрын

While you're technically correct, interference is not specific to offensive players. It also extends to catchers, umpires, any player that isn't in the game, and fans.

@Fit4C

Жыл бұрын

Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell

@chavamitzen1894

11 ай бұрын

Yes, except that interference is on the defensive and obstruction is on the offense. I use catchers interference to help remember.

@ericwildfong

3 ай бұрын

@@chavamitzen1894 Catchers interference is the "oddity" where it's the catcher that gets in the way of the batter swinging the bat. Interference is typically committed by the offence involving hindering or impeding the defence, while obstruction involves the defence hindering or impeding the offence. Spectator and umpire interference are similar in that they involve a spectator or umpire hindering or impeding the defence. Both interference (all types) and obstruction while some have prescribed penalties generally follow the mantra of "Nullify the act" or in other words, position runners based on what in the umpires judgement would of happened had there been no interference, in some cases that means letting the result stand. Say a runner trips over a fielder who isn't fielding the ball (Type 2 Obstruction), but they still make it in safely. You don't enforce additional penalties because the trip didn't result in an unfair advantage for the defence (didn't hinder or impede the runner enough to change the result). Alternatively, suppose the same runner trips rounding second, but then gets out halfway to home. Again it's Type 2 Obstruction so if the umps determine he wouldn't of scored anyway he's still out. Its only really in the close plays where type 2 obstruction really comes into play. You can even hear the umpire in one of the clips calling obstruction as "Thats interference" so even pro umps can't keep the two straight sometimes.

Not sure what is so 'illegal' about most or even all of these plays. More than anything, they're just bloopers.

Elvis Andrus shows up quite a few times here

That game 3 of the Cards and Red Sox series was my favorite

Agree with most comments..these clips are interesting BUT they cut off way TOO SOON.

An explanation of what happened & why would be better.

You need to improve your editing skills. You cut the plays short before the story even gets told.

You have excellent videos, did your editor just had an off day? I still am a fan of your videos. Just seemed the editing was a little sloppy. But thank you for the entertainment

Intentionally hitting the umpire? My hero.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

😂

@kevinadrian9366

Жыл бұрын

I don't believe it was intentional. Sometimes catchers get crossed up.

@arinerm1331

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinadrian9366 If the clip had played out instead of having been cut off when it was, you would have heard the play-by-play commentator mention that the umpire had recently missed an obvious strike call. The battery were trying to wake up the umpire.

@RobertShubitowski

3 ай бұрын

@@arinerm1331 Plus an earlier questionable strike three call on a Tigers' batter and ejections of the Tigers' starting catcher and manager for arguing over the call you mention above.

maybe let some clips play out? some of them I have no idea of the outcome...otherwise thank you!!

Obstruction on the guy who fielded the ball - that's a new one.

You cut them all too short.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching bro

@hospedajepr

Жыл бұрын

Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max

@laurakruk4692

Жыл бұрын

@@hospedajepr I’m subscribed to SEVERAL DIFFERENT sports channels and they ALL have INTIRE clips posted in their videos without any issues! He’s the ONLY channel that does this!

@hospedajepr

Жыл бұрын

@@laurakruk4692 intire clips well he only does entire KZread videos. Thanks for your comments, have an intire beautiful day ;-)

@bluecadillac

Жыл бұрын

@@hospedajepr That's not why or how COPYRIGHT works. Top All Sports should learn to insert some educational comments. ) > "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."

I stopped watching a little over halfway through. He wouldn’t let the video clip go to the resolution to even sure what the call was in so many of these.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

😊

Would be good to see some info on the why's and how's of why these plays were illegal. Some are obvious but others need some explanation and slo-mo ect. Otherwise it was an interesting video. FYI I'm an Australian with an interest in mlb so a lot of the finicky rules I'm ignorant of.

@Rodent1970

11 ай бұрын

@@LiamG4 Thankyou for that. Some of the throws looked deliberately thrown into the runner but the runner was penalized. Doesn't seem fair.

@ericwildfong

3 ай бұрын

@@Rodent1970If you're talking about the Runners Lane interference ones (throws to first from the home plate area), the runner isn't protected running outside the runners lane in the last 45ft to first (supposed to be in foul territory up the first base line). He can leave the lane in the last step or two to reach the base, but if he never entered he can't leave. The throws might be deliberate but the runner also isn't where he's supposed to be and he's "in the way" so by rule you have RLI (Runners Lane Interference). Baseball interference/obstruction rules are decently complicated

I used to be fast enough that I could reverse direction during a run down just as they threw the ball and run into them, always got the base.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Nice tactic

@blauer2551

Жыл бұрын

@@TopAllSports our coach taught us to stay out of the base line so that couldn’t happen and you weren’t throwing over the runner either.

I was at that Oakland vs Boston game at Fenway. That was game 3 of the 2003 ALDS. A's won the first two game of the 5 game series and gave away two runs in game 3 then lost games 4 and 5. Was the series that set up the 2003 ALCS where Grady Little did not take Pedro out of the game and he lost the lead. Yankees when on to win in game 7 with a Boone homerun but the Marlins won the World Series.

Dude these clips infuriate me😂

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

😂

Thumbnail ump giving the universal “don’t do that” sign 😂

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

😂

So many of these involved Ahmed, what in the world.

Tough way to lose or end a game. Got a new subscriber. Was fun to watch. Great video

Here's an idea: cut down on the number of plays and let the explanations from the announcers or umpires come through. I know the rules of baseball inside and out as a former umpire with 3000 games officiated. Most people don't have that kind of knowledge.

It's kinda interesting how many times Ahmed comes up in here.

This should be titled "a lot of bad baseball calls"

So.. runners getting hit by a thrown ball to first are interfering? In my world, the base runner gets the benefit of the doubt. The man has to run the baseline, it's not his fault the defender can't aim.

I always wondered what happened to Edward Scissorhands. Apparently, he's editing your videos.

very cool vid

Dude play through the play ....

Should change the name of the video to “baseball in-play bloopers” because thats what this is. Because despite them being illegal, there all mostly failed plays.

Lack of context = lack of entertainment

@hospedajepr

Жыл бұрын

Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max

I love this video, the plays are great but whoever set it up did a SORRY job. WAY TOO MANY plays were cut off not knowing the result. LET THE PLAY FINISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shouldn't professional baseball commentators know that it's called "obstruction" when a baserunner is hindered by the defense?

@kurtissjacobs5618

Жыл бұрын

I came to comments just to say that few things irritate me more than an announcer with 30 years expereince calling obstruction "interference." Since you're already here on top, I'll reply instead of posting my own. But the answer is "yes."

@kurtissjacobs5618

Жыл бұрын

Oh criminy, then we finally have an announcer saying "obstruction" and it was runner interference see 12:08.

@screwthisin

3 ай бұрын

Or just call it offensive or defensive interference. Offensive if the offensive player interfered with the play, or defensively if the defensive player interfered.

5:18 It was not interference in the 1975 World Series. When Larry Barnett did not make the call on Ambrister. His non-call made him famous.

I honestly miss like, 80s 90s and 00s sports... back when defense mattered, when everyone wasn't soft. And Im young like Im in my 30s, not some boomer here but I understand how thing are now. Gotta protect the athletes, it makes sense but, you don't see many exciting plays like the Albert Belle one for example, guys using their body to intimidate has always been a part of the game. Yeah you're out if you do that but you should not get suspended by any means for a play like that. But nowadays you might... IDK. It's why guys like Tom Brady and Lebron James will never be among the best in their sport, they've been so heavily protected that they've had an advantage 10 times greater than say, steroids would give a player. They don't have to take any hits compared to players in previous eras like Montana Bradshaw Aikman Elway, Jordan Jabbar Bird Iverson Thomas Barkley Robinson Malone etc, even say, Kobe Bryant for example. He won his championships in seasons where you had NBA finals games being 81-76. Now? Noone plays defense, and you got 120-115 games with guys like Lebron Harden and Curry playing zero defense, standing there shooting 3's without having to drive the ball. Early Career Lebron I respected, same with Brady. Late career, not so much, just overprotected faces of the league who win scripted-fixed titles cause them winning makes the most money for each league.

@camc9093

10 ай бұрын

You said you aren't a boomer, then gave the most boomer response ever

@MoneyHoneyBunny

10 ай бұрын

​@@camc9093 You must be seriously depressed and lonely to even reply. Me? I'm waiting for my beautiful fiancee to get out of the shower so I've got a minute to put you in your place. Hows that super bowl choke taste still after all these years? Gotta suck knowing the Seahawks shoulda had a dynasty. And what happened to your NBA team? Good luck with the shitty NHL team your city bought.

Bro Ahmed in like every clip

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

😂

Too many of the clips are being cut off, before I can see the results of the play.

A-Rod knocking the ball oout of Arroyo's glove in the 2003 ALCS should have been on this video.

@rubewaddell1704

8 ай бұрын

I was looking for that. Has to be the most famous interference play ever just about.

"You can't do that!" clap clap clapclapclap

Sorry, I don't understand what the final decision was on several plays. Please restore the explanations of the play.

Hmmm, can someone please explain to me, why it is interference by the runner, when said runner is hit by the ball in the back while running? I mean there is no chance to avoid being hit, when they are running on their line and the catcher throws the ball to first base and hits the runner in the back?

Why is a runner with his back turned away from the player throwing the ball interfering when he's just trying to get to base? That rule needs to be removed.

You forgot "Slappy" Alex Rodriguez

Maybe let the clips go a little longer. No idea what happened in half of them.

thank you for cutting all the videos short so we didnt get a chance to see what illegal acts were called.

1:06 if the catcher runs into the batter, and the ball is the other direction, how is that interference? Ball is to the left side, foul, and catcher runs forward fair to make the 'interference call'.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

Have you ever caught a high pop up like that? The ball does not go straight up and it does not come straight down. The batter needs to know where the catcher is and stay out of his way.

@briancallaway1690

Жыл бұрын

Which is why as the hitter you need to immediately leave the area after contact is made. Not just stand there looking around.

Why you cut the videos so short. Whats the point if you dont know the outcome

The very first play is NOT a balk. It's a violation of rule 5.06. The catcher used his mask to stop the ball. It's the detached equipment rule.

I wish these broadcasters would learn the difference between interference and obstruction

The runner's lane plays are painful to watch... we all know the rule, so until it's changed get outside the line and figure out how to step on the bag from there. This should not be difficult.

@jondp214

Жыл бұрын

First base needs the double bag

@Desirsar

Жыл бұрын

@@jondp214 Yes, but the runners still need to figure out how to run in the correct lane until then.

I heard "Ahmed" so many times 😅 dude plays super rough

Baseball has some of the stupidest rules

suprised you didnt include pete roses illegal miscondust with minors, that was the most illegal moment in baseball, still a great vid tho

The ump eating one is not illegal.

In the very first clip, the announcers got it wrong. They said "balk. The pitcher did not come to a complete stop possibly". That is not what happened. The reason the runners were allowed to advance one base is because the catcher illegally touched the ball with his catcher's mask. That is illegal in baseball. It is explained in this video kzread.info/dash/bejne/m5ydyo96p9beodY.html

@ross-carlson

9 ай бұрын

Yeah, we'd have known that if he didn't cut the clips so incredibly short. Such a shame, could have been a cool video.

6:13 he clearly sticks out his arm in order to draw obstruction and he got it.

Luv u bro❤!

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

❤️

Ur insane

You need to let the play and play call end. You're cutting the clips too short.

Saying that that was them intentionally hitting the umpire is one of the dumbest things I have seen in awhile. Hmm...I'm going to throw it hope it doesn't hit the batters bat or body, hope the catcher misses it (and if he's in on it make sure it looks like an accident). That is just silly.

Lots of clips, no explanations, no resulutions.

12:12 that’s bs the first baseman came all the way over in front of the second baseman

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

So what? he was trying to field a batted ball and he has the absolute right of way. The runner is out for interference.

@jondp214

Жыл бұрын

First base needs the double bag with this rule, makes it cut and dry.

You cut away too quickly. No one knows what the plays are for the most part. You need to show the final results.

I can deal with the unknown broken rules, but I despise cheaters.

I don’t understand when a player throws a ball at the runner and they call the runner out?

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

That happens when the runner is out of the running lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.

Please leave the call in these clips

I hate the new rules.

@TopAllSports

Жыл бұрын

Me too

As someone who's trying to increase my knowledge of the rulebook, this could have been really interesting, but with most of the replays and commentary missing, it's too difficult to follow.

@polarvortex3294

Жыл бұрын

You're right. But I enjoyed the video by embracing the mystery of it all.

@alanhess9306

3 ай бұрын

Close Call Sports is much better at explaining rules.

@Keifsanderson

3 ай бұрын

@@alanhess9306 I'll check it out. Thanks.

Some of these are the worst excuses of 'rules' ever. A runner running straight down the line to first base, someone behind him throws the ball directly at him, hitting him..... obstruction?

@grumpyref

Жыл бұрын

I don't really understand this rule either. I don't watch baseball, but this rule doesn't make sense to me.

@alanhess9306

11 ай бұрын

First of all, it is interference, not obstruction. The runner needs to be in the running lane to avoid interfering with the fielder taking the throw at first base.

9:34 I think that call was kinda crap if you ask me, that was a pretty normal movement by the batter and he wasent even in the way, he didn’t slow up the catcher any and he still made a good throw so not sure why there was interference

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

The batter moved out over the plate interfering with the catcher. Interference was the correct call.

Why they gave him 1st base is beyond me. He didn't block the runner until he had the ball in his glove. And the runner was out of the running lane, as well. Terrible call.

@alanhess9306

3 ай бұрын

The running lane is irrelevant on this play.

Commentary on what happened ???

Listening to the announcers so ignorantly calling obstruction interference and calling interference obstruction makes me crazy.

Why did the ball touching the catchers mask matter

Whatever happened Im sure the umps got it wrong and half the time the Dodgers were the culprit.

3:17 alguien me explica que pasó?

You might want to practice a little more before you upload any more videos

As with many of these baseball compilations, there is no context. No explanation of what happemed and why.

What about A-Roid slapping the ball out of the fielders play at first base?

The announcers not knowing the difference between obstruction (defensive team) and interference (offensive team) is infuriating.

@davidforbes4392

11 ай бұрын

Obstruction is on the defense. Interference is on the offense.

@zakaryjester8434

11 ай бұрын

@@davidforbes4392 that's... Exactly what I said

8:30 where the hell is the runner supposed to go? He's basically already on the base when the throw gets there.

@alanhess9306

3 ай бұрын

He should be in the running lane, which would protect him from interfering.

You need to let these run so the viewer hears the final outcome !!

Dang

Hitting the ump with a pitch isn’t against the rules, so I stopped watching.

Some play results not shown

Poorly put together. Seem to lost the “thread” of what the video was about.

Tough to understand how you obstruct a runner to first base in fair territory. The runner should simply not be there, hence so many interference calls in favour of the fielding team. Some consistency here would be helpful.

@alanhess9306

11 ай бұрын

It is interference if the runner is out of the lane AND interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.

Yeah okay Ynoa looked as if he were trying to obstruct the runner, but if the runner had been in his 3' lane as he was supposed to be, there would have been no contact. I could see "that's nothing" on that one.

@sethranney

Жыл бұрын

right? If he just stayed on the baseline (or even on the dirt) he would've been fine.

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

The runner does not have to be in the running lane. He can run wherever he wants. The rule is if he was out of the lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, he would be out. But that is not what happened in this video. Obstruction on the pitcher was the correct call.

@MaydayAggro

Жыл бұрын

Runner's lane only comes into play on a throw to first.

@MaydayAggro

Жыл бұрын

​@@alanhess9306 obstruction on the pitcher was absolutely the worst call. He fielded the ball and had it in his glove when the runner collided with him. Notice the first baseman's glove is empty?

@alanhess9306

Жыл бұрын

@@MaydayAggro Watch it again and pay attention this time. The pitcher did not have the ball, F3 had the ball and the pitcher was between the runner and F3. Try again.

I don’t get how Peacock can get an interference call @3:00. He’s following the baseline, and it’s not like he can tell the where the ball is coming from behind him. Is he supposed to shift over out of the way while running to first?

@alanhess9306

3 ай бұрын

It is a clearly running lane interference, absolutely the correct call.