American aircraft carrier: 40 dudes in multicoloured shirts on deck waving their arms around. Russian aircraft carrier: 1 Dude in a black jacket who leaves the deck 30 seconds before launch. I love the contrast.

@900stx7

3 жыл бұрын

You don't need such a large crew if you only have one plane .

@SanJorgeBlackTails

3 жыл бұрын

@@900stx7 they don't need more than one plane to do the same job too

@Draxindustries1

3 жыл бұрын

This is the difference between how the two sides work. Having a 'shooter' really isn't needed. USA employs far too many non needed ground crew..

@liberalsarefuckingretarded7800

3 жыл бұрын

One jet and a small crew because they have weak military power.

@Draxindustries1

3 жыл бұрын

@@liberalsarefuckingretarded7800 Quite the opposite. The military power of Russia is far superior to the USA, fact not fiction..

"Won't the ramp at the front make ship go slower?" "Yes but jet make ship go faster." "Genius comrade."

@Galm02

2 жыл бұрын

😂

@zxmilo

2 жыл бұрын

😹

@joez.2794

2 жыл бұрын

Say what you will about the ramp, but it's got to be a HECK of a lot cheaper and more reliable than steam catapults 🙂

@name5798

2 жыл бұрын

@@joez.2794 can really carry many weapons or fuel on the jet or many jets on the carrier

@sniper_elite3853

2 жыл бұрын

@@joez.2794 ramp is literally worse in every aspect other than price, catapults will launch aircraft with full load in any conditions meanwhile ramp launch doesnt allow full load and takes up lot more space

When he was building the thrust, he pushed the carrier it’s highest top speed ever recorded.

@majalca03

3 жыл бұрын

Well that depends on how many escorting tug boats were on hand that day to pull the aircraft carrier.

@cardinalofthetachankachurc326

3 жыл бұрын

wait is this true? can you send me a source

@randompeople7595

3 жыл бұрын

@@cardinalofthetachankachurc326 all hail Lord Chanka, anyways I think he said a joke.

@max00506

3 жыл бұрын

@@majalca03 stop making fun we use underwater kraken to tug the carrier✋😂

@50pAndie2pounds2

3 жыл бұрын

Makes sense 👍

Who cares if it's outclassed today? It's still one of the coolest-looking airplanes ever built.

@bodaddy6771

2 жыл бұрын

outclassed ? its one of the best jet in its category , extremally fast and maneuverable

@ItsToXxy

2 жыл бұрын

@@bodaddy6771 Outclassed by 5th generation fighters obviously

@kirillprivalov2728

2 жыл бұрын

K modification is like 4+ gen

@hansloyalitat9774

2 жыл бұрын

@@bodaddy6771 but it sucks in BVR

@kiubekpl5863

2 жыл бұрын

mig 29 is outclassed by planes like f15 in bvr and thats where most fights happen

I love that there is one guy on the deck. One.

@artysanmobile

4 жыл бұрын

Michelangelo Mason Yeah, they’re just messin’ around on a Sunday.

@stilgardragonclaw5834

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly.

@L0r0x_o

3 жыл бұрын

It was the other guys day off

@bigbob1699

3 жыл бұрын

who needs a crash crew , a safety officer , or a flight deck captain .

@L0r0x_o

3 жыл бұрын

@@bigbob1699 people who crash due to lack of safety and supervision 🤔

love how all the control surfaces are moving, it's like an excited cat or dog wagging its tail

@MrHealey01

3 жыл бұрын

I believe the mig is trying to fly the ship in pitch and roll

@oxcart4172

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, he can't wait to get some exercise!

@JoeOvercoat

3 жыл бұрын

Wait...what? I thought those were paddles!

@o.5523

3 жыл бұрын

its like the jet and pilot had TOO much coffee

@AxCYeR

3 жыл бұрын

guys if you keep replying to this comment i have to keep watching this awesome video over and over ahhhh

No catapult 🗿 No deck crew 🗿 No blast deflector 🗿

@demiurghg

2 ай бұрын

Actually, "Admiral Kuznetsov" has blast deflector.

@Dr1vovic

2 ай бұрын

These are Russians , baby....

@Pman353

2 ай бұрын

No powerplant 🗿

@user-sj5xc8bg8j

Ай бұрын

@@Dr1vovic нет, это твоя американская глупость. найди видео где миг-29 взлетает с полной боевой загрузкой как это делает сша! ты его ненайдешь. а знаешь почему? потому что они это не могут у них НЕТ КАТАПУЛЬТЫ!

@smail991

Ай бұрын

No aircraft carrier

Plane: still Me: skips 10 seconds Plane: mid-air Me: wtf

@nolan122

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I did

@lordbluebaron2270

3 жыл бұрын

Did you guys not see or hear the A/B?

@paolinopaperino10

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordbluebaron2270 the what?

@lordbluebaron2270

3 жыл бұрын

@@paolinopaperino10 after burner

@paolinopaperino10

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordbluebaron2270 yep yep but the thing still took off in 10 seconds, from the moment it wasnt moving

The "K" in MiG-29K means it overclocked !!

@coyoteranger

3 жыл бұрын

K for "Knockout (power)" )))

@owomator6587

3 жыл бұрын

this comment is underrated

@GustavoMendozaCanales

3 жыл бұрын

Yeap. At the side, there's a label saying "Vladimir Inside".

@ahsnsb

3 жыл бұрын

@@GustavoMendozaCanales lol

@MlMlN0

3 жыл бұрын

"K" is the first letter in a word Korabelniy - (for ship)

"No need catapults when we can bend steel in a shape of ramp!" - Some Russian engineer.

@fredmdbud

4 жыл бұрын

Probably after seeing the British use a carrier ski ramp in 1944 ...

@anlq1240

3 жыл бұрын

Because we Russian don't want to carry any ordinance.

@fetusofetuso2122

3 жыл бұрын

@@anlq1240 who needs ordnance when you have the putin stare?

@Dork20

3 жыл бұрын

Description: "Watch as this MiG-29K fighter jet pulls off an incredibly short takeoff from a runway ramp on an INDIAN aircraft carrier"

@hindolbhattacharya4242

3 жыл бұрын

@@Dork20 The INDIAN aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya, was designed and built by Russians. Though our own designers are using the same STOBAR technique for the indigenous under development carrier INS Vikrant. It is less costly to design and build STOBAR and takes care of the naval requirement for the time.

Even the MiG is excited! Look at it dancing before taking off

The MiG-29 has always been one of my favorite aircraft, it looks really nice.

haha i bet it even gives the ship a little forward push while the brakes are locked...

@4hockeyskate

7 жыл бұрын

old f14 tom cats would actually increase a nimitz class carriers spot by just about 1 knot when on afterburner strapped to the catapult

@simulatedpilot3441

7 жыл бұрын

4hockeyskate how us that when there is a big wall blocking the thrust on US CVs

@4hockeyskate

7 жыл бұрын

Daniel Lee because that jet blast diffuser isn't directly behind. There's a good 20 foot gap

@trap-du3hd

7 жыл бұрын

+Daniel Lee you know the kuznetsov also has a wall right?

@AELINIC

7 жыл бұрын

i was just thinkign the same lmao

Everyone one has color coded crew, special rules and procedures In Russia you just get told to do your job and don't stand in front of the jet when it takes off

@michaelovrutsky5927

3 жыл бұрын

They simplify it!

@ShizzleGaming14

3 жыл бұрын

@@weasle2904 just to remind you this is an indian aircraft carrier lololol

@yusufn7467

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@michaelovrutsky5927

3 жыл бұрын

@@ShizzleGaming14 Indian plain doesn't have red stars on their wings!

@Arcalargo

3 жыл бұрын

@@michaelovrutsky5927 True, but it is an Indian Aircraft Carrier. Probably a technical demonstration for exporting the '29K.

engineer: how long does the ramp need to be in order to take off? pilot: tell you what, how tall..

@mindricangabriel553

3 жыл бұрын

The ramp is so long is need to limited the G-force that go to pilot

@AirwarsA15

3 жыл бұрын

@@mindricangabriel553 englando nice

@Goyahkla100

3 жыл бұрын

"Extremely short"

@leooram1959

3 жыл бұрын

@@Goyahkla100 it just need to point upwards

@deang5622

Жыл бұрын

@@leooram1959 No. When the British started to consider ramps in the 1970's, 1980's they experimented with different angles.

See you in two years time when this gets recommended again

@davidmurphy1207

3 жыл бұрын

You were only the 47th person to make this comment. Well done you cracked the top 50.

@fuahrahn

2 ай бұрын

3 years past, r u still with us?

@QuicksilverVM

2 ай бұрын

3 years 😅now

@henrylake3

2 ай бұрын

@@fuahrahn I am and thank you for bringing me back to this icon

@armyhunter1260

2 ай бұрын

YEAH I AM HERE RN

The fuel burn rate of that thing at afterburner, is roughly similar to my old Jeep Grand Cherokee.

@Johmander

3 жыл бұрын

xD

@carl10_philip

3 жыл бұрын

Haha

@Fadaar

3 жыл бұрын

Spent 4 years in the USAF and back seat for a few F-15E engine runs, one in burner. It was quite comical watching the fuel gauge do cartwheels in burner.

@Travis_22

3 жыл бұрын

@@Fadaar Awesome! Lovely machine. I'm ex-military too. Was In KAF 2007-08, used to love watching the F-15's take off whilst on my jog around camp.

@nallid7357

3 жыл бұрын

@@Travis_22 Military planes always puts me in awe when I get the chance to see them. I liked watching the C-130 land whether it was on or off an aircraft carrier.

Did anyone else notice he timed the takeoff with the pitching of the deck?

@antonybooth3293

5 жыл бұрын

He doesn't time it. The takeoff is controlled by the wheel chocks being dropped by a flight controller. The pilot is there for the ride.

@stevehove2648

4 жыл бұрын

What are the chances that was just coincidence?

@ikec2894

4 жыл бұрын

There is a video (have to find the link) of a former F-14 pilot who says that very thing.

@ravikakhandki7594

4 жыл бұрын

You time yourself to release brakes when the carrier has pitched down, so that when you rotate the carrier is pitching up again

@cliffwhite2812

4 жыл бұрын

The precise timing of launch with relation to bow pitch is an inherent part of the ski ramp use, as designed by Doug Taylor of the Royal Navy for Harrier operations at sea.

The mig 29 must have incredible struts on the landing gear.

@koerrie

2 жыл бұрын

It has.

@21boxhead

Жыл бұрын

HAS BIGGER WHEEL THAN NATO JETS

That has to be one of the best looking, and powerful looking planes I have ever seen.

@scratchgotcrazybeats44

2 жыл бұрын

yes

@bobbythomas6520

2 жыл бұрын

F22>

@mark261166

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobbythomas6520 Fully loaded Tornado, with swept back wings.

@bobbythomas6520

2 жыл бұрын

F22 full burn, SU27 is beautiful too, F14 is iconic, and people say Fat Amy is ugly but I think the 35 looks alright

@EDWARD_KOENIG_ARCHITECT

2 жыл бұрын

Still love the F-14 Tomcat.

When you think the planes at full throttle but it's only at a high idle, then it finally goes full throttle.... fuckin insane!

@SQUISHBUBBLE

3 жыл бұрын

Honestly! 🤯

@bradclark6478

3 жыл бұрын

High idle huh?

@fishis14

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradclark6478 "high idle huh?" Huh???

@bradclark6478

3 жыл бұрын

@@fishis14 “high idle” huh?

@hanskanns7014

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradclark6478 😂😂

I graduated as a doctor, but i'm an aircraft expert from wikipedia and reading people's comments... And what i can say is, that plane is definitely Russian. Period.

@supersoupss

5 жыл бұрын

Also f35 is shit and a10 warthog is the best ever

@Dream0Asylum

5 жыл бұрын

@Idlia Dosai Well, he is a doctor - but, more over, he slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

@dalethelander3781

5 жыл бұрын

I bow to your expertise.

@FlowerCrownOfPoppy

5 жыл бұрын

liv3rpool92: I sexualy identify myself as an attack helicopter, and I find your words offensive.

@liv3rpool92

5 жыл бұрын

This is more amusing that i thought it would be... 😂

That is impressive with no catapult! .thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿

I love those jets, as an American I can only wonder what could be if the two most powerful nations on earth were friends, imagine what we could do to eliminate problems globally

@alexanderbalin1683

2 жыл бұрын

As a Russian I agree with You... maybe we need some extraterrestrial enemies 🙃

@lotled6878

Жыл бұрын

Прекратить все войны и приступить к освоению космоса.. а не гоняться за новой модой всяких тряпок.. медицина экология освоение новых пространств

@Eye5x5

Жыл бұрын

Idk, I feel like russia has become so weak overtime, I think china is the most powerful superpower now, 2nd being the us and 3rd is russia

@BSPotter

Жыл бұрын

you mean the US and China?

@assistemptyltd3001

Жыл бұрын

Competition stimulates progress.

Amazing. I saw a Mig 29 at a airshow once in the US performing with it's nose pointing upward while it basically hovered at slow speed. It is a beautiful aircraft.

@kerrystewart3145

5 жыл бұрын

That's always impressive. Gotta love airshows

@alexanderbalin1683

2 жыл бұрын

Cobra

@stevenscoggins170

Жыл бұрын

The Blue Angels do that too! As do the Thunderbirds, the F-22 Demonstration Team, and the Red Baron Pizza Squadron.

@user-zw4el5oc1d

10 ай бұрын

​@@stevenscoggins170 all of jets afrter superhornet(not f-35) i think, can make cobra. Su-27/30/33/35/57 and f-18/21/22, rafale, typhoon, viggen, draken, gripen, j-20 etc

Damn look at the horizon, that ship is bouncing in those waves 🤮.

@grndiesel

5 жыл бұрын

Notice how he times the launch for when the bow pitches up.

@sullyman72

5 жыл бұрын

@@grndiesel yep, he timed that launch perfectly.

@greghm

5 жыл бұрын

it's Putin!!!

@Josh93B93

5 жыл бұрын

@le Hoarderz Al-Shekelsteins then just dislike and scroll to the next video then bitch, this one is clearly not for you 😂😂😂😂

@wozza77able

5 жыл бұрын

Drake Luxus didn’t even notice it til I read the comment

WOW! Awesome! Love the sounds and roar of the engines - freaking epic! I noticed no catapult and one crewman.

@valldemarb3949

2 жыл бұрын

We don't have catapults on aircraft carriers. :)

@andrewc0128

Жыл бұрын

Budget cuts.

@F22ERaptor

Жыл бұрын

@@andrewc0128 😂🤣😂

@death_parade

Жыл бұрын

@@andrewc0128 Believe it or not, its not budget cuts that caused this. India's first indigenous carrier is also a STOBAR like this one and cost us $2.9 Billion. A carrier with similar size but CATOBAR configuration would be the French CDG class carrier which cost 3 Billion Euros. Marginal difference.

Ship slammed in the brakes exactly when the jet became airborne, thus hurling the plane airborne like a frisbee.

@lenny0347

3 жыл бұрын

🤯

@lonewaffle231

3 жыл бұрын

XD

@erichkorman710

2 жыл бұрын

No brakes on a ship

so many carrier operation pros in the comments :d... but what do I know? I am a simple man, I see Mig I press Like

@soumadip_skyy_banerjee

6 жыл бұрын

xXE4GLEyEXx me 2

@williambenedictalava2634

6 жыл бұрын

Hell yeah good sir you are not alone.

@williambenedictalava2634

6 жыл бұрын

Joshua Ngau Ajang coz big sis Su is sexy than mig

@carlosszr

6 жыл бұрын

"...I see Mig I press Like! That is the reason why you criticize some comments that hurt you. Pathetic fanboy.

@pulkinpulman2028

6 жыл бұрын

ASTRO BOY william heyy

Used to love watching the old WW2 footage of them literally dropping off the end of the runway out of sight then popping back up again.

@andrewyoung4473

3 жыл бұрын

Those were some brave people. No ejector or anything, just hope you make it.

@krashd

3 жыл бұрын

You can see here that the pilot waits for the ship to pitch down so that it is pitching back up by the time they reach the end of the ramp, it's not entirely necessary unless you are in bad weather, but on the old WW2 carriers it was mandatory - if you reached the end of the ship at the wrong time you would be straight in the drink.

@Dularr

3 жыл бұрын

Same thing would happen here if the MiG was fully loaded with fuel pods and bombs.

Разница сразу бросается в глаза - как взлетают американцы с катапультой и как наши на форсаже - подчеркнутая мощь. Миг - это круто.

@samtatge8299

2 ай бұрын

No catapult to malfunction

@LinsksRBLX

Ай бұрын

You guys are like "old is gold" 😂 but seriously that plane is amazing

@holgerrussel

Ай бұрын

Nachbrenner gibt es in allen möglichen Jets. Und die bösen Amis können auch ohne Rollbahn, Katapult oder steinzeitliche Rampe starten.

@qwanathomas735

Ай бұрын

F15 is better.

@holgerrussel

Ай бұрын

@@qwanathomas735 Абсолютно правильно 👍

The flaps always remind me of that kid in every neighborhood that can wiggle his ears and wants no one to forget it.

@Serkay64

3 жыл бұрын

I think you mean the elevators

@cassu6

3 жыл бұрын

thats me (see just proved your point :D)

@MayimHastings

3 жыл бұрын

@@Serkay64 Yeah, sorry, I knew I’d get a quick correction on that 😂. I was tired and couldn’t think of what they were called 😉

@MayimHastings

3 жыл бұрын

@@cassu6 Proud of you, son, you have a rare gift... hope you use it wisely, and may you always get adequate lift.

@chrisbeber9177

3 жыл бұрын

Flaps? Apparently someone was a grunt 🤣

'Catapults? We don't need no stinking catapults'.😉

@McRocket

5 жыл бұрын

@@FirstDagger - That is generally a myth. The MiG-29K (the aircraft in the video) can launch fully loaded from launch position number 3. Given a reasonable length and with a ramp that is steep enough, virtually any aircraft that can be catapulted at MTOW can also takeoff using a ski jump at MTOW. Anyway, I was sort of kidding with my top remark.

@FirstDagger

5 жыл бұрын

@@McRocket ; I highly doubt that the MiG-29K can launch with full load from a carrier with ramp. Please provide a source.

@McRocket

5 жыл бұрын

@@FirstDagger For the Su-33 (which is a much heavier plane) www.sinodefenceforum.com/stobar-aircraft-ski-jump-performance-su-33-j-15.t8043/ I have no interest in getting into a big debate over this. If this isn't good enough for you - tough, sorry. There are NUMEROUS sources out there that clearly show that the idea that planes cannot take-off on ski jumps at MTOW is a complete myth. Just Google for them. We are done here. Good day.

@JoelLinus

5 жыл бұрын

@@FirstDagger It still flew tho

@FirstDagger

5 жыл бұрын

@Dwarov 1 ; It was common consensus for the MiG-29K and Su-33 that they could not used with full armament and fuel from the ramped carrier. Something which Russian simulators like DCS seemed to support. Also as those newer data point claim they have to be considerably further back which limits deck use, unlike US carriers.

An old classic for sure. Beautiful aircraft with lines similar to the Tomcat... which was certainly a beauty. Impressive take off.

@phoenix9137

2 жыл бұрын

Man the f16 is older than her

@death_parade

Жыл бұрын

MiG-29 might be an old classic. But the MiG-29K is brand new. India bankrolled its development in the 1990s. It entered service in the early-2010s. And will be out of service in the mid 2030s.

Mig-29 still looking good!

Actually looks alive, like a bird testing the wind before flying away.

Heineken logo on the side confirms that this is indeed a russian fighter

@ellotoys8082

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@nihatsavmaz6677

3 жыл бұрын

russians have taste dude. they drink the best beer.

@satriyowicak380

3 жыл бұрын

Hail to the finest beer

@wouterberings6535

3 жыл бұрын

@@satriyowicak380 I don't think you've ever drank it

@ashemgold

3 жыл бұрын

I actually had to go back and fact-check that statement. Verdict is... True!

We have the F 15 , 16 22, 35, but the cool factor of this aircraft is still off the chart.

Imagine how strong that landing gear must be to hold back all the force from the after burner...

@abercrombieblovs2019

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure those were brakes. Anyways, it’s pretty easy to get landing gear to support the weight of this thing.

@datboi2232

3 жыл бұрын

and also, they dont use the afterburner on takeoff

@TheNicestPig

Жыл бұрын

@@abercrombieblovs2019 Brakes can't hold back the afterburner, Eastern Aviation Cruisers have wheel stops that pops up and down to block the landing gears from moving. Look at the gears at the moment of launch, you can see small pads retracting below the main gear And they obviously use afterburner too idk what the fuck the other guy was smoking

@TheNicestPig

Жыл бұрын

@@datboi2232 they do. Most do. F/A-18s must always takeoff with afterburner even.

That is truly a beautiful little fighter, only outdone by the even more graceful beauty of the Su-35

I love how it was moving its flaps like a bird wagging its tail.

@Serkay64

3 жыл бұрын

Elevators

@dextrosity7350

3 жыл бұрын

I ain't ever seen a bird wagging it's tail

@FirebonE_88

3 жыл бұрын

@@dextrosity7350, you should go outside more, then. Search white wagtail on youtube.

The plane has some balls. To do that with no catapult.

I notice how the carrier was bobbing with the waves, and the Mig took off during an upward movement of that motion, which will have increased the initial upward force dramatically, and I wonder that was deliberate.

"Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines."

@bh8671

3 жыл бұрын

Yes. Because race cars are relevant to this. 🤔

Some guys came out in the balcony to wave him a pleasant journey...

@Helifella882

3 жыл бұрын

Balcony? It's not a posh hotel room.🤣🤣 Bridge wing or "goofers deck" for those in the know my friend.

@arisarsenis3500

3 жыл бұрын

@@Helifella882 Still a balcony...

@alohathaxted

3 жыл бұрын

It was a minstrel show. Didn’t you see the Banjo?

Alright, now land it. That plane is beautiful

@alimehboob8908

5 жыл бұрын

how do u think it got on the ship?

@alimehboob8908

5 жыл бұрын

aircraft carrier*

@Azakadune

5 жыл бұрын

@@alimehboob8908 I was talking about the PLANE TAKING OFF.

@Azakadune

5 жыл бұрын

@@alimehboob8908 I'm saying it's gonna be difficult if not impossible without a cable to catch.

@yusuckx

5 жыл бұрын

ALI Mehboob they built on the ship

MiG29 iconic and legendary aircraft 😎

1:06 the only guy on deck runs away... “LOUD NOISES!!! LOUD NOISES!!!”

Migs are built like a brick wall ... That is sheer power on takeoff. Wow!

Quick search results: "In 2013, Russian Mig-29K fighter jets performed testing aboard Indian Navy aircraft carrier INS “Vikramaditya”." =Former Soviet vessel "Baku".

@007turtle1239

2 жыл бұрын

Definitely not the Baku.

@Cabalero24

Ай бұрын

перед тем как строить авианосцы советскими учёными было подсчитано насколько целесообразно их строить, расчёты показали что если противник не банановая республика то авианосец это просто большой и очень дорогой гроб для небольшой армии высококлассных специалистов. поэтому строительство авианосцев было ограничено парой штук для престижа. от катапульты отказались потому что в северных морях технологически невозможно обеспечить стопроцентную работоспособность таких механизмов.

That's mighty impressive, any time of the century.

A MiG-29 Fulcrum, first introduced in 1983, the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum has two Klimov RD-33 engines capable of producing 36,600 pounds of thrust giving the this 2,000 lbs aircraft a top speed of 1,520 miles per hour and having a range of 888.6 miles. The MiG-29 has a single GSh-30-1 30 mm cannon, it can also carry as air-to-ground missiles such as, Kh-25ML/25MP, Kh-29T, Kh-31G/31A, Kh-35U, and rockets. the MiG-29 air-to-air payload is two R-27 medium range missles, six R-73 and R-60 air-to-air short range missiles. with all this the MiG-29 has a maximum payload of 4,000 kg or 8,820 lbs. The MiG-29 has a Phazotron RLPK-29 radar fire control system which includes the N019 Sapfir 29 look-down/shoot-down coherent pulse-Doppler radar and the Ts100.02-02 digital computer which has a Search range of 70 km, a tracking range 35 km, and can track up to 10 targets, and engage up to 2 targets.

i love how theres like, one dude on the deck wearing a black tracksuit as opposed to US supercarriers with its absolute hive of deck activity and dudes making cool poses to the pilot to run them through their startup and takeoff.

@hymanocohann2698

3 жыл бұрын

Mebbe cause we do it with intent, their doing it for effect, no load light fuel.

@donlove3741

3 жыл бұрын

1 plane on an empty deck. So yeah 1 guy.

@maxim6088

3 жыл бұрын

@@hymanocohann2698 i mean, in this case, this was probably just a test, so as you said the craft is not loaded with anything, and they don't need a crash crew since this isn't during a war, and their pilots are the best of the best

@vcs206

3 жыл бұрын

ahahahah...the difference struck me too......

@Jehty_

3 жыл бұрын

@@maxim6088 Indian pilots are the best of the best? I did not know that.

1:30 - "Fuel state critical, returning to land..."

@juanordonezgalban2278

3 жыл бұрын

LMAO

@AlexBlak3

3 жыл бұрын

This is not omerigan junk.

@adewey33

3 жыл бұрын

LMAO! good one!

@weasle2904

3 жыл бұрын

@@AlexBlak3 lol, the funny thing is MIG-29 have ridiculously low ranges and inefficient engines. The carrier MIG-29k is even worse at half that range due to the weight restrictions they have to do because of their extremely primitive ramp system, on top of not being able to carry virtually any ordnance. Versus American carriers which can launch with full takeoff weight.

@dimbasz

3 жыл бұрын

That's actually true, fighter jets have to be stupid light to take off from carrier without catapult, so the amount of fuel and payload is pretty strict - no heavy bombs and operation range about 600 km.

before taking off, the pilot was asked to accelerate the aircraft carrier a little. To do this, the pilot pushed the fighter into the stops and turned on the afterburner😁

Man, it kept getting cooler as the video progressed. Nice.

I like how the pilot waited for the ship to sway down a wave to launch, so that he would reach the end of the ramp by the time it swayed back up

@user-qm6mk2hf8i

3 жыл бұрын

Это не пилот управляет взлетом, а офицер по полетам.

@thejollyrancher6713

2 жыл бұрын

MY POKEYMAN IS GREATER THAN YOUR YUYE POKEYYYYY POKEYMANNNN

I dont think this is the most efficient way of adding more speed to a carriership !

Such a majestic piece of engineering!

Anyone else notice the ship itselfs timed the takeoff with the flow of the waves, or am I just high?

@clemenshofbauer1111

2 жыл бұрын

Pilot timed it

A 10 second video jam-packed into a minute and 48 seconds.

@wiggles1550

4 жыл бұрын

But the deck assistant was my favorite part!

That was pretty cool. As usual, the pissing contest comments are worth a laugh as well.

@loreaver3882

6 жыл бұрын

ApriliaRSV4F the reason I come here

@erichkorman710

2 жыл бұрын

Thats America! We always denigrate our opponents as unworthy before realizing our mistake. We laughed at little Vietnamese that drove us out still shooting like Iraqis and Somalians did. Traitor Trump negotiated with terrorists- ; he begged the Taliban to stop killing us as we bailed and signed a "Document of Capitulation", our first surrender in history. We should have remembered Afganistan has never been conquered

Love the deck chocks holding her back...

Well when you have turbines the size of volcanos I'm not surprised!!!!

Good footage; impressive takeoff, and with afterburners as well; thanks for that; the 29’s are a cool aircraft.

Such a short take off is possible because those MiGs can hover in the air.

I’ve often heard people make jokes about the ramp on the bow…I dunno, kinda makes sense to me…no catapults to break/maintain.

@bop3752

Жыл бұрын

Severely limits the jet’s max take-off weight

@thebasedspectre3048

Жыл бұрын

@@bop3752 In aviation, a ski-jump is an upward-curved ramp that allows aircraft to take off from a runway that is shorter than the aircraft's required takeoff roll.

@bop3752

Жыл бұрын

@@thebasedspectre3048 Traditional catapults allow for much heavier take-off weights.

I love Russian aircraft. Very beautiful

@GrumpyGremlin.

5 жыл бұрын

*Blyatiful You're welcome

@robynsnest8668

5 жыл бұрын

Functional and built to be very rugged and cheap. From aircraft to rifles.

@trickydick2909

5 жыл бұрын

I like them too but I wouldn't call them beautiful.

@johndoe9200

5 жыл бұрын

Its Indian

@Munchanse

5 жыл бұрын

My father was a soviet engineer and worked for many years in setting up equipment in the cockpit on MiG: 21, 23, and 29. But even now he is not at all enthusiastic about condition of the Russian Air Force.

Rip headphone users

@agusto7391

7 жыл бұрын

ok

@MrPlostyles

6 жыл бұрын

Agusto what you say i can't hear you

@anderspan1226

6 жыл бұрын

i loved it

@icepcakep7883

6 жыл бұрын

Agusto shit hahaha

@justinereich5956

6 жыл бұрын

Agusto not really

When you consider the 25kts of the carrier plus 15-20kts for the headwind, the Mig itself doesn't need to be going that fast to get enough airspeed.

Now you just need a tugboat to drag the ship around....

The pilot did not 'pull anything off'.....the airplane took off EXACTLY as it was designed!!

@liammorris1018

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah the pilot is just flying the aircraft. *Rolls eyes*

@divadgivin369

3 жыл бұрын

No, see that ramp. It gave lift. Had it went on the straight runway, into the ocean.

@getsideways7257

3 жыл бұрын

@@divadgivin369 That's exactly how it's supposed to take off from a Russian carrier though...

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@@divadgivin369 thats how stobars are designed Einstein

Tower : " You are cleared...congratulations on such a short take-off sir." Mig-29 : " Thank you tower, requesting permission to return home, I am now low on fuel." Tower: " Request approved congratulations on accomplishing your mission to randomly entertain strangers on KZread that are up waaaay past their bedtime." Mig-29 : " Thank you sir...this is what we train for."

@justpette1503

3 жыл бұрын

6.42 AM, yeah, I uh... Yeah...

@dusmantaborgohain7600

3 жыл бұрын

Just love this comment

@Twentycent911

3 жыл бұрын

Accurate

Just imagine the possibility of one of those stops releasing a second before the other. A yaw movement this close to the main superstructure would be disastrous

I love the cute little happy flaps pre-take off

@joeking22

3 жыл бұрын

And what man doesn't like cute little happy flaps 😎

No catapult, nothing...This is insane.

@Jonay1990

5 жыл бұрын

almost empty on fuel + no external stores...

@fabiolean

5 жыл бұрын

ski-jump carriers don't use catapults. They're simpler and cheaper, but the weight of the aircraft taking off must be much more limited as a result.

@Hokunin

5 жыл бұрын

@@fabiolean that is if aircraft flying off from 2 nearest launchpads, if its taking off from one farthest launchpad, then it takes full fuel and armament. In here it took off from somewhere in the middle. If you look at the video you can see yellow trajectory markings on ground for the farthest launchpad.

@MistedMind

5 жыл бұрын

Insanity? No... THIS - IS - RUSSIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

@ButchE30M3S14

5 жыл бұрын

They didn’t even use trust panels...Dam...

Ever take it off any sweet jumps?

@lafeeshmeister

4 жыл бұрын

The comment I never knew I always needed

@boxhawk5070

4 жыл бұрын

A crying shame that this comment had only 6 likes when I saw it.

@mawage666

4 жыл бұрын

I know right. In 2 years the ones below mine get over 1000 likes. And my even way better comment gets 7 in a year. Even if you haven't seen Napoleon Dynamite it's still a pretty funny comment I think. I guess I'll have to dig deeper and think of something better lol.

@selfaware114

3 жыл бұрын

His mission was to catch a delicious bass.

@basketvector7311

3 жыл бұрын

good one

Mig-29K pulls of a normal carrier launch. I'm glad I didn't miss it 🤣

Such a beautiful aircraft.

MiG-29K is awesome!

@user-fs5vw7ci7j

5 жыл бұрын

Это едет китайское дерьмо на свалку

@user-fs5vw7ci7j

5 жыл бұрын

Скажи спасибо, русские хоть показали вам как жопу вытерать и жить научили, а то бамбук в задницу пихали и японцев в рабстве ходили.

@user-md9xq4cq3c

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-fs5vw7ci7j kzread.info/dash/bejne/paaLrdCmg7DdiKQ.html

@user-fs5vw7ci7j

5 жыл бұрын

Тупая обезьяна спустилась с бамбука и что то мне говорит про историю...

@user-md9xq4cq3c

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-fs5vw7ci7j ИДИ РАБ ЩИ ЖРИ!ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F

Something about the power, speed, thrill of these aircraft that really excites! No wonder Top Gun was such a massive hit!

Such an impressive aircraft. Game changer.

I like the little automatic wheel chocks, that's a clever solution.

If you notice, the pilot timed it perfectly to lift off right as the carrier was at the peak of a wave

@doso4782

5 жыл бұрын

I think someone else was controlling the chocks (or whatever they are called I dunno) Im not an expert though.

@iowadrummer79

5 жыл бұрын

@@doso4782 Ya, I guess that's what I meant, that the launch was timed perfectly.

@john_in_phoenix

Жыл бұрын

Timing takeoff to the waves goes back to before WWII. Escort carriers in high sea states especially.

no catapult, just raw power :)zooooom!

@utar88utar

5 жыл бұрын

...like all aircraft carrier planes.

@andreylarin6461

5 жыл бұрын

And this is his weakness. Due to the lack of a catapult on Kuznetsov, only aircrafts with a thrust-weight ratio greater than 1 can be used. This limits the amount of fuel and weapons

@NatanelYaHu

5 жыл бұрын

Yea now try it with a payload.

@FITHRI1000

5 жыл бұрын

@@NatanelYaHu you are now better than any Russians Engineering. Congratulations!

@watannen

5 жыл бұрын

@@andreylarin6461 Russians don't really play with thrust-weight < 1 toys anyway so...

it's the curves that do it for me

Amazing how much it looks like a f-14 tomcat from that angle !

Catapults: *Am i A jOkE tO yOu?* Runway: *aM i?*

@bomberex7809

4 жыл бұрын

Nah it’s neither. Skater gang bruh.

@yeetseekingmissile3252

4 жыл бұрын

Because catapults are totally useless

@kundanpatil3133

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂 that was too funny

@petergriffin8969

4 жыл бұрын

@shadowbonnie 647 they allow aircraft to take off with greater payloads

@yeetseekingmissile3252

4 жыл бұрын

@Rage Quit I was using sarcasm LOL

They used the straight wind, a holding device for the wheels, Afterburner and a ramp to do this. A catapult is way more diversable on any conditions. But hey - respect for the best use of given resources! That is the spirit of russian technology and that is very, very clever. I love it! I learned a lot of my russian co-workers of simple but effective solutions. A true strengh of russian minds. If Germany and Russia ever understand, what is possible without any ideology or nationalism, we could be close friends. And if I think of my co-workers - in fact we are. Damn politics. They know nothing.

@karo7355

3 жыл бұрын

That's what Marx, Stirner and Engels would like to hear.

@michaelbuckers

3 жыл бұрын

Don't need catapults when the plane has >1 TWR, might as well take off vertically while being propped upright.

@peerx7866

3 жыл бұрын

If we all could work togehter, these machines were not needed and all the money saved could be used for a better humanity.

@michaelbuckers

3 жыл бұрын

@@peerx7866 And if grandma had a dick she would be grandpa. Get over yourself dumbass kid.

US engineer: Ok so lets build a sophisticated steam catapult system to launch our jets the highest speed possible Russian engineer: Dima do you remember that one time we were in Moscow's skatepark?

@DeputyNordburg

2 жыл бұрын

US Pilot: I have full fuel tanks and max weapons load. Russian Pilot: I have half fuel and almost no weapons. Indian Pilot: Cool guys, thanks for watching my video.

@Ooog__

2 жыл бұрын

it was the Brits who invented the steam catapult lol

@DeputyNordburg

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ooog__ Samuel Langley an American invented the aircraft catapult in 1896.

@Ooog__

2 жыл бұрын

@@DeputyNordburg that wasn't steam powered, and his attempts failed

@garlkurzer

2 жыл бұрын

@@DeputyNordburg Propaganda

La puissance des réacteurs est stupéfiante, il a même pas perdu d'altitude en sortant du porte avion et sans catapultage !

0:33 - Deck dude ran in FRONT of the Mig while the engines were spooled up

@Fe7Ace

3 жыл бұрын

It's okay, he was wearing high visibility black, also he didn't have any hearing protection so he was well aware the plane was spooled up and therefore knew that it was unsafe to cross behind it.

@divadgivin369

3 жыл бұрын

I just know that with all these mechanically contraptions no engineers of the world will ever make water gravitationally held on a globe configuration.😥😂🤣🤔

@GerardScroogeGoes

3 жыл бұрын

It's a Mig 29. They have engine intakes ABOVE the fusulage as well. (Not sure that the K version has these though as they are to prevent dirt intake from a runway. Little chance of that on a carrier. But than again they are stationed on land most of the time as well.)

Without a catapult, its takeoff weight is severely restricted. It can't carry a full load of fuel and bombs.

@moveaxebx

7 жыл бұрын

Flankers take off fully loaded all the time.

@spiritofattack

7 жыл бұрын

I don't see any load on that plane. I don't believe that they take off fully loaded. A catapult launch system is needed to take off fully loaded, and neither the Russians nor the Chinese have it. I hear that the Chinese may be working on the new EMALS (Electro Magnetic Aircraft Launch System) which the US Navy is also developing. The EMALS will be better than the steam catapults (cheaper, safer, more flexible) but right now the US system is TOO POWERFUL, over stressing the aircraft. Refinements are needed, so it is almost two years from operational status. The British will use EMALS on their second new carrier; the first carrier, the Queen Elizabeth, will use the F-35B STOVL (Marine) version of the F-35, which has short takeoff capability designed into the aircraft. The MiGs do not have short takeoff built into them -- a short takeoff version was dropped from production. The EMALS will probably be sold to India for their future carriers, when it is fully developed.

@nickdawn3985

7 жыл бұрын

Bruce Gordon Than you're blind, it's got AA clearly seen on the left wing.

@spiritofattack

7 жыл бұрын

Nick Day - Yes, there is a small missile under the left wing. That's not much of a load. No external fuel tanks or bombs. According to Wikipedia, the MiG-29K is designed to defend the fleet, not to penetrate or attack ground targets. It can't take off with bombs and fuel tanks without a catapult. The more I learn about catapults, they are very big and very expensive. Britain's next carrier, the Queen Elizabeth, would have been too expensive with catapults. By using the F-35B STOVL aircraft, they don't need catapults. The Russians don't have any such STOVL in their inventory or planned. So, Nick, that's a very light weapon load intended for fleet defense only.

@RickDeckardMemories

7 жыл бұрын

It's correct, it's not an opinion, these are facts. Payload suffers for the lack of catapults. I'm Russian, so I'm not being political here, these are just plain facts - no other country comes anywhere close to American aircraft carrier fleet capabilities.

I want to see the full video. The one where the MiG29K prepares to take off, takes off, does a circuit then lands, because that is all it can do with the fuel it has. Notice no weapons and little fuel shows the limitations of these style of carrier operations with the thirsty Russian fighters.

That’s just the most amazing thing I’ve ever seen…no country has ever in recorded history done this

*I wish he didnt zoom in right after take off so I could see how fast it was climbing. Instead of looking at a stationary mig*

That, is a designed standard takeoff. There is nothing short, or long. Update comments: My view:- if the length of runway required for a take off is to be measured, there should not be any assistance made for the aircraft concerned. The clip shows that the main landing gears of the MiG have stoppers raised up to the second the jets are in full throttle with their afterburners on. When the stoppers dropped, the MiG dashes towards a ski-jump ramp to raise it's angle of attack. If any short or long is to be ascribed to the takeoff, it can only refer to the designed mechanism and not the aircraft. The MiG takeoff cannot be any longer or shorter. Nothing more from me, case closed.

@ak-1271

5 жыл бұрын

This I think only americans use the launch system nowadays

@StruggleGaming

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah didnt understand why this was a "short" takeoff. Tt's a carrier, it's all "short"

@nogisonoko5409

5 жыл бұрын

@@ak-1271 You mean the CATOBAR system, or in easy term, catapult system?

@novadusty6465

5 жыл бұрын

@@ak-1271 : The French is also using the catapult.

@robertrichard6107

5 жыл бұрын

Yep.

Seeing the tail - elevators constantly move up and down before take off reminds me of how kittens and cats do those paw twitches before pouncing

Took my breath way.

Done with 2 AAMs and a quarter fuel load. Hope ur intercepting two Cessnas.