When you say that those Oxford students seem immature and unknowledgeable in comparison with the Harvard students in 2009, you forget that the Harvard students were actually studying this subject and were required to read the works of Kant and other numerous handouts, whereas the Oxford Union is simply a debating society and thus the audience there is from different academic backgrounds, many of which have little (if at all) to do with ethics

@lseul8812

3 жыл бұрын

They all take philosophy courses per req. they should have all already read many of these works.

@drewkavi6327

3 жыл бұрын

@@lseul8812 they don’t all take philosophy courses, what are you talking about?

@ClementineEcho

Жыл бұрын

The Harvard course also had what sounded like an online discussion board and he mentioned students' arguments from it. They were prepared for debate in several ways.

@nonenadanull

5 ай бұрын

​@@ClementineEchoYou're correct. I attended his course. That's how the online students were able to benefit from being involved in the debate.

I love how about 5 minutes in, he just switches to "professor mode" and just goes with the discussion.

i put these lectures on loudly while i'm cleaning and i get lost in the stories and arguments, thanks for providing a little escape.

@saferroof5593

3 жыл бұрын

I am doing just the same right now

@GreatGranger

2 жыл бұрын

Me too

@kallistajohanson6399

2 жыл бұрын

Actually what I’m doing now XD

"..overcome the bad habit of outsourcing our moral judgements to markets.."

@eagillum

2 жыл бұрын

1:06:46- and to not say, "I respect all ideas" as a cop out.

Perhaps one of the best public speakers in the world, scores high on both presentation and content! 10/10 would recommend

@ducman1611

4 жыл бұрын

no shit Sherlock!

@frankiefrank4853

2 жыл бұрын

Certainly lucky to have access to these lectures and discussions.

@jagrutijadhav4580

2 жыл бұрын

Suggest some more speakers like that....

I sincerely appreciate that he recognized that there may be a language barrier at 27:00 and adjusted to keep the flow of the lecture.

@JimmyDerocher

2 ай бұрын

Yeah seriously, he didn't bother to explain what a hedge fund manager was he just gave a more generic and precise example.

As far as paying kids to read, I think the argument Josh made is very valid. It's like what happened with high-stakes testing in the 2000s. Teachers actually gave their students the answers to these tests so that they wouldn't be at risk of losing their jobs. Teachers started teaching kids how to pass the test and as a result the kids weren't learning any critical thinking skills and would solve problems and answer questions more like a computer than a human being. Incentivizing learning didn't help at all, and paying kids to read books won't help either. They won't become more thoughtful, careful readers, they'll just be chugging through them to earn those two dollars.

@nonenadanull

5 ай бұрын

An alternative to money, incentives could be trivial like acknowledgement by ribbon, certificate, and/or public recognition in the media.

Mr Sandel, you remind me of my father. Thank you for the things I've learned from you. Thank you for the thoughts. Thank you for being a Teacher!

@jaimeedwards8781

Жыл бұрын

I love Micheal Sandal, such a phenomal bloke. I've learnt alot from him, towards my own life.

His lectures on Justice, populism, democracies, what money can’t buy & others are awesome. I enjoy listening to his every talk 👌

@divyanshshukla6411

Жыл бұрын

I have seen justice can you provide link of populism and democracy

It's very frustating to be able to see this socratic type of class and not be able to participate. Awesome!

@KheraShanu

3 жыл бұрын

take his justice class online

@sudarshan3965

3 жыл бұрын

This is not a normal lecture

@eagillum

2 жыл бұрын

@@KheraShanu are you talking like a MOOC course? Or actually enroll at Harvard and take his class online?

Most insightful student comment is at 27:02 -- "you have to make another argument about how selling a kidney or sex is essentially different from selling your intelligence" -- effectively generalizing the terms of the debate from prostitution and kidneys to all work, and the degree to which we instrumentalize ourselves in everyday life.

@linas_i

3 жыл бұрын

I think it is wrong to generalize all work as the same. Intelectuals sell their intelectual work, not them selfes. House builders build houses, so “sells” the building, not them selfes. They are using their knowledge or physical strengh to create someting, that is not them selfes. Prostitution does not create any product. So it is selling your own body, while in other examples - it is about selling your own work. I think it is a big difference in this and saying “all work is the same” would be oversiplyfing the problem.

@benjaminr8961

3 жыл бұрын

Prostitutes don’t just sell access to their vagina. Have you ever had sex with a woman that just lies there? Highly paid prostitutes are probably very skilled at having sex and are therefore selling their skill not their body.

@destinyosayiogedegbe65

Жыл бұрын

@@linas_i good point

listening to some of these oxford students make not-too-great arguments was so good for my self-esteem

@demoncard1180

5 жыл бұрын

You might also be interested to hear that even if some of them are the brightest people in the country, they're not *all* of the time, in *all* situations. It's just the media's habit to create an image of them as being something greater than human.

@ibrahimkonefilsdiarrassoub5736

4 жыл бұрын

😂 😂 😂

@ulugbekisakov1484

4 жыл бұрын

Hey, don't rush to jump into conclusions, they may not be the best representatives of Oxford. If you want to check what bright minds they could cultivate, just look at the list of Oxford alumni. And Michael Sandel is on of them by the way.

@guillermoruiz9739

3 жыл бұрын

Ego, you mean.

@drefloresca95

3 жыл бұрын

@@guillermoruiz9739 yep

Wow! I love watching Prof. Sandel's teaching techniques. As a parent who successfully reared a child with ADHD, paying him for grades was the initial incentive that got him hooked on reading and learning, as school work was very frustrating for him. Then, the intrinsic value of learning took over. My son then graduated from Harvard Law. For low income children who face deprivation and lack, they need the tangible reward of seeing the results of their efforts. For my child, I made a graduated scale (okay the scale was long ago): $5 for the first A, $6 each for two A's, etc, so that all A's ended up being worth $10 each. It was highly motivational. I reasoned that when I work, I get a financial reward even though my work has other great values and contributions. For young children, doing school work is their job. We put monetary values on everything in life. If you are hit by a drunk driver and left maimed or paraplegic, no amount of money can pay you for the loss of your limbs, but putting a dollar compensatory value on it is all we can do.

Sandel for president !

@maryistoocoolforyaa

7 жыл бұрын

Maltese Falcon I'd vote for him!

@JoePalau

5 жыл бұрын

It’s worth thinking about the so-called market value for our labor and the extent to which contracting our labor is coerced by social inequities or whether the valuation of our labor is determined by free and open market forces or by a market constrained by market controlling corporations. The thought experiment brings the economic justice of wage valuations to light. At the very least, we ought to disabuse ourselves of the naive belief that marketplaces are free and open or inherently equitable. All economies are political economies and, as such, respond best to political forces that protect the rights and interests of the least advantaged. Labor Unions and governments (labor law / civil rights law / commerce law) are institutions can serve to protect and promote the rights and interests of wage earners. No simple solutions to be had to be sure. Naively holding onto a faith in “free and open” markets hardly works. The dialogue led by Sandel at least sets the table and casts aside naive and magical thinking about how market economies work.

@letstalkpakistan493

4 жыл бұрын

Plato dancing in his graves... Philosopher Kings

@ohitsthem7601

3 жыл бұрын

I wishhhhh

@busigator96

3 жыл бұрын

Tax the robots!

This was a really nice, engaging, informative lecture. I'm happy I have the opportunity to watch it.

I loooove how the professor paraphrases the students' responses to clarify model language, terminology and communication. Excellent!!

This is a very good topic which needs to be explored further. Thanks to Professor Michael Sandel. My take is, there should always be things that money should not be able to buy.

his book: 'moral limit of markets' was my top 5 favourite book ive ever read...and i read a lot of books. i even have a library room in my own house!

Our body is some sort of gift to keep it . Where as our knowledge is acquired , gained from society or institutions. Selling our knowledge can’t be the same as selling our body.

So good to hear these innocent students speak without understanding the context of the debate in the wider world

His lectures are really so engaging and stimulating

How peacefully he discussing with students. Awesome!

I am speechless with his wisdom. This is an amazing lecture. 👽♥️♥️♥️

I wish I could have participated in this. I'd have so many questions and answers in my want to learn. Oh well, thank you for this lecture!

it is amazing to see how these philosophical questions impacts big issues in society.

@bankafouf

2 ай бұрын

The answer is Socrates my human fallow.... It's because of Socrates

Thanks MR Sandel very very much for these 69 great minutes, thanks for the ideas the presentation the way you managed the participants. I'm so grateful for watching your lectures. Though it's so sad to watch such an impressive both lecture and debate and not be able to practice the idea of participating in a moral and human society. I'm writing this comment from Egypt where the concept of ethics and moral are almost vanishing, It's sad and frustrating that we would have been able to value our moral codes and live with our ethics comfortably and freely if only one wasn't born in such a doomed spot and time.

Listening to your lectures have enriched my life. Thank you.

I really like those kind of debates those students are lucky to have you around them

insightful conversation with Professor Sandel

Thanks for this amazing lecture again )) Lot of love from Namibia

The artful way Sandel gets her back on topic at 28:00 is wonderful - she has a point, but it's not part of the discussion - he doesn't even comment on it. A man of focus!

Really feel for the guy raising his hand at 51:14 . Captures exactly how I feel at busy pubs.

@lyrilljackson

8 жыл бұрын

+utlcutl exactly why you shouldn't waste time in colleges, because they make you go to these stupid ass lectures that is the core of their teachings, and even the frontrunner of discussion as shown here still fucking disregard, due to the constraints of big classroom which is a result of the prestige of colleges vs just talking to a random people in a pub who may well have much better idea about whatever this guy has to say, especially scaling with the more famous you are as a lecturer, now that millions of people know what he's mostly all about

@ndndndnnduwjqams

3 жыл бұрын

@@lyrilljackson wtf happened to you? You seem traumatized

@lyrilljackson

3 жыл бұрын

@@ndndndnnduwjqams wow nice necro bump there son

@ndndndnnduwjqams

3 жыл бұрын

@@lyrilljackson hahaha true. How are you nowadays?

@lyrilljackson

3 жыл бұрын

@@ndndndnnduwjqams how are you?

He’s a rockstar in my eyes. I appreciate him so much.

Michael Sandel ought to moderate political debates in the presidential elections.

He has same wisdom like my father , very brilliant man. My father is full of knowledge

You never can buy authenticity in relations. That is if you base only such relations by emotions. Emotions that fluctuates, emotions that judges anything that only goes along with it.(To be continued)

OMG OxfordUnion keep these types of discussions and these guest lecturers and these types of videos coming. #Knowledgeporn

Maybe the reason it could be considered "wrong" to sell our organs or bodies for sex would be that typically when we buy something we are using it as a tool and taking ownership over it. The object or the thing that is being bought automatically has less value than the buyer because the buyer is able to purchase it and own it. So in light of prostitution if you sell you're body you're automatically becoming less than the person who is buying your services. So even if the society was equal, and someone wasn't forced whether by violence or financial need, they'd still be valuing themselves as less than another.

@dhanidefelice7779

7 жыл бұрын

Reggie W finally, some one got the underlying message of the lecture

@nafonieys4543

7 жыл бұрын

Fundamentally I agree with your reasoning. However, we buy more than goods, we also buy services like electritians, masseuse, psychiatrists without thinking that any of them are "lower" than us. so I think the way we think of prostitution has more to do with social construct than probably the service itself.

@meimeiza

7 жыл бұрын

Reggie W the fundamental question is morals. The essence of being human. What is our core values - does the means matter just as much as the end? Does the purpose of production and exchange matter? It goes to a deeper philosophical question of existence and what life means to all of us, whether you have a higher purpose in life - because if you don't then it doesn't matter.

@benjaminr8961

3 жыл бұрын

Someone is selling what they don’t need in exchange for something they do need. That is the long and the short of it. If someone does not have any other options than you are providing something they “need”.

a view from phenomenology could help. To distinct the esencial from the accidental, what's accidental can be bought , what is escential can not

Awesome session. Lol that guy in grey t-shirt has his hand raised Mr. Sandel !!!

Thank you Dr. Sandel.

This man is a living treasure

@bankafouf

2 ай бұрын

Exactly... Treasure

A great example of the Swiss character. Can see now why allocating monetary units in schools for extra responsibility led to a separation into leaders who get the monetary reimbursement and the disengagement of those being led. Collective co-construction was diminished and leaders ended up close to burnout. Market incentives of money lessen the communal aspect of a school community amongst professional colleagues.

I would like to offer Mr. Sandel a Mastercard.

Thank You . I am so grateful to you!!

Excellent lecture!!

I have an idea: let a whole group of Texas game hunters bid for the privilege of hunting each other on an unpopulated Pacific island, and use that money to protect the black rhino. It's a two-pronged approach; you increase the rhino population while reducing the game hunter population, and no rhinos are harmed in the process.

@Darling137

7 жыл бұрын

Almost clever.

@demoncard1180

5 жыл бұрын

There are too many battle royale games as it is. One was too many.

@benjaminr8961

3 жыл бұрын

They should let people engage in any agreement as they do choose so long as there is proper oversight. Would be thrilling to be in that situation.

Dude this guy is a legend

I have seen his lecture they r very intellectual...this man is very smart...I'm from India

Brilliant, very good discussion here

If money is the secret to motivation, then the rich should be dancing in the street. But only poor kids do that.

@MrPedala94

3 жыл бұрын

the rich are dancing in the street, it's just that it's their own personal street they're dancing in

@pk3m3

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrPedala94 Maybe they are but so is the poor. I guess its just a further proof of money, happiness and motivation not walking hand in hand.

@TheGh0streaper

3 жыл бұрын

they don't dance in the streets they dance in clubs

Thank you Michael sanders. Another reason markets are brought up often in political discourse is because politics and economics are almost inseperable. Because it has proven that countries with the largest markets wield the highest powers especially financially. Money makes the world go round. If we can't all come to a conclusion on what the acceptable values are and how the world is run, the next best thing is to control money. We don't all have the same values, sadly so. Even good values are unfortunately disregarded by some. Having money= having power= control. Most would rather just do what brings most money or makes their markets boom most at the expense of values. Again, because we don't all have same values. I believe in world peace, but does the country next to me believe so??? If we don't have the finacial resources to defend ourselves or even prevent ourselves from being trodden upon in any way. Markets might be a way to escape normative arguments and all but I can see why it is the core determinant for decision making.

54:35 I'd like to dig further into this case. Does someone have info about which community is on the spotlight ?

I'm clarified thank you 💕💕💕🎉

Great talk, but a little ironic that this video has about 20 ads built in.

@Gmakosyd

6 жыл бұрын

Ads? What ads?

amazing conclusion

yes , there are , & I shall remember you forever.

51:32 I feel bad for the guy raising his hand all this time and not getting even one chance to speak 😔

@38:28- this is easily countered with a minimum bid which is the normal practice in auction

16:59 i was repeating what u just said 😂😂

From an accounting perspective, there are intangible assets, which are hard to value with money

Aside from Josh's argument from the last case, majority of the students, if not all, didn't really think out their argument and have sound reasons for their argument. The first two cases were challenging though, but these are supposed to be Oxford students.

@thegoonist

5 жыл бұрын

completely agree. this is disappointing. the reasons and arguments from the students were weak.

@Sui_Generis0

5 жыл бұрын

So what if they're oxford students? They could be studying say chemical engineering and never thought of these questions before and just came to hear/participate in the discussion in real time

he is like giving a lecture in the class

I would say " Dear Lisa and Michael, today is your wedding day, and I have found this speech online and I think it is what I think about you guy. I am going to read this to you "

@hassan6692

3 жыл бұрын

Putting that way would be hillarious LMFAO

More people need to watch this.

One must do things for the soul, and not let it be lost in your daily transactions. One must cultivate a pure soul, things of materials in nature will pass like everything else, you must answer for a higher calling, which I believe is self sacrifice.

Anyone else think he looks like Tywin Lannister?

@gmart225

7 жыл бұрын

hhaah YASSS

@jennymisteqq695

7 жыл бұрын

chataolauj I think he looks like Mr. Drummond.

@emperorpenguin448

6 жыл бұрын

Vladimir Putin.

@ritika2563

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you!!

@marcusheng9726

5 жыл бұрын

chata

It's truly sad that we lost the language to discuss sanctity of a life. I would say the objections to killing the rhino or selling oneself I to slavery etc... is what kind of person does the rhino killer or slave owner have to be to engage in this behavior? Are they a person you would want to be a friend of, spouse of, would a country full of those people be good trading partners or allies in a war? Would you be ok with your standard of living being dependent on slave labor? The rebuttal would be we can ritualize the attonement for these sins as necessary evils by having a sort of modern scapegoating event. We may offer up to the gods a goat in recognition that what we are doing is reprehensible but it is necessary for our existence in this case we could point to animal medical testing as a necessary evil. This ritualized event of forgiveness would counteract the character degradation such evil acts cause by recognizing that they are evil and permissible only to the extent that we have no other option but preventing further slide down this slippery slope. Ultimately whichever side you land on is subjective and neither opinion is correct or incorrect. I don't have an answer to this one but I at least understand the sides of the discussion.

question about the jail cell upgrade is an interesting one to me. my parents work in a jail, one as an inmate counselor and one as the Chaplain. i've always thought that NO, if you're in jail you should NOT be able to live in a more comfortable life just because you have the desire AND ABILITY to do so. however... i now wonder what the extra money goes towards. for the most part, that money will be direct surplus - maybe some of it goes directly back to the inmate in terms of extra items or something, but once the cells are built, that money is just there. so the question to me is, what do they use it for? does it help the general situation in the county? other inmates who can't afford basics? to me, if the money goes to a good moral cause, i might support it ONLY UNDER THE CONDITION that this option was NOT available to those whose crimes were things like violent felony, murder, rape, kidnapping, that kind of thing. if you're there for a low-level offense and you didn't hurt someone, then i could get on board with that.

Guys, can help me with the name or data of surveys he mentioned? (the swiss radioactive and kids on charity)

I am an information technology person at York university in Toronto.

I have seen his Harvard lectures and student participated so brilliantly and gave very rational and logical reasons. Whereas here students aren’t able to provide any sound objection to the question.

@E1M16

2 жыл бұрын

Those students were philosophy students while these are not, so that's probably why.

Can't Oxford budget 100$ for a low-end audio tech to set up the mics and man the sound board? Such great content has rarely been so annoying to listen to... I'm here perched on the end of my chair! Somebody honour Pr Sandel with some well-earned respect-monies please.

The question about the Rhino is really easy to answer if you are a consequentialist. :)

There is no right or wrong...but a question of morality...that diffrences throu out time..(.for example middle ages ..now...the future??)..

I'm soo soo late in commenting, rewatching this vedio and thinking he is the cutest professor ever😭😭

Oxford university's student response totally different from the Harvard university's student

Noam Chomsky talks about this. How Neoliberalism has led to the utilitarian view of all things - without truly acknowledging and appreciating the intrinsic value of all living things. Neoliberalism leads to the privatization of what were once known as public goods, and turning everything into a commodity. In other words, putting a price on everything, based on a cost-benefit analysis. This is only looking at the utility of an object without truly understanding the consequences of potentially depleting or abusing a resource that we all commonly depend on. For example, when it comes to environmental problems - capitalists and the ownership-class would like to avoid stringent regulations administered by various agencies. They believe this will inhibit the free-market, and such an oversight is unnecessary, especially when it comes to supply a specific need. Putting a price on everything leads to the mental-framework of just looking at the costs of utility. You cannot put a cost in the biospherical integrity of the entire planet with finite resources. You cannot put a cost on a human-life when it comes to military conscription or giving a child up for adoption. The privatization and commodification of markets, has led to a very dichotomous view of what the cost to human life are. Neoliberal ideas have led to the socioeconomic disparity of differing classes, de-regulation of industries, and environmental costs to our entire biosphere. Capitalists are in pursuit of constantly seeking to expand the market and commoditizing everything. Putting a price on everything, for the sake of increasing their sphere of influence, for the sole purpose of primitive accumulation and profit maximization. In consequence, we see very depersonalized system that dehumanizes individuals. The false tautology of saying that the market determines allocates and distributes wealth and income in a neutral, impersonal, and fair way is the biggest lie. Market rules are organized, stipulated, and enforced by our legislature, administrative agencies, and courts - they ultimately determine what can be privately owned, what degree of market power is permissible, what types of contracts can exist between employer and laborer, and what is enforced in the free-market. Unfortunately, neoliberal ideas have proliferated, and espoused this false tautology that we live in a meritocracy - and that there must be a price on everything. They have abrogated and rescinded means of enacting more public good programs and safety-nets, and curtailed any efforts of correcting market deficiencies created by unfettered capitalism. Indeed.

Resoundingly yes. Magic is one of those things.

Sa palagay ko mas mabuting we should use our own body parts to live and let live, and even to love , to enjoy life rather than fighting even though it's individual choice for mutual love but not mutual fighting because we don't want bad result that could happen maybe even to cause use of force.

Please put subtitles 🙏

I feel for the guy in grey sweater. Man left hanging 🤣

We do it all the time, we send our kids through education to see what it is they may like doing with their lives. They may not like many many classes but they still will learn and something might spark their imagination.

brilliant

Evidence is a real sense of responsibility for any personal attributes to the real life experiences. Also the the detection of life and law in provide a deal with prerogative serial and momentum aspect of real property and individual news in real life situation,. More so it allows, the design and pattern of life.

Interesting discussions, the same moral discussion are also being raised in psychology. However well intentioned, Money will always be used to corrupt others, even those with strong ethics and principles, especially when they have things in their past they are ashamed of or will effect their reputation or position of power. An those who live in poverty will always be exploited by wealthy powerful people. Thank you, Peace

@benjaminr8961

3 жыл бұрын

People in poverty are not exploited through capitalism. They trade willingly. Without capitol the services will become a matter of privilege which will be distributed at the discretion of politicians. That is when the true exploitation begins.

@gonx9906

2 жыл бұрын

@@benjaminr8961 i know you comment is 8 months old, but i cant believe you just watch the entire video and still come up with something like this.

@benjaminr8961

2 жыл бұрын

@@gonx9906 Well maybe I came into watching this video with more knowledge. Allowing political positions to leverage great amounts of power incentivizes bad people to seek those positions. The result is always rampant corruption. Places like Iran, Saudi Arabia, China, and Russia where political elites wield all of the power politicians can do whatever they want.

@gonx9906

2 жыл бұрын

@@benjaminr8961 "with more knowledge" are you kidding me?? he is a harvard professor, those are oxford students, he cited two cientific research and you have more knowledge?? all you are doing is vomiting the libertarian speech over and over again, grow a brain pls and learn to think for yourself.

@benjaminr8961

2 жыл бұрын

@@gonx9906 I was saying I have more knowledge than you. Also being a professor docent mean you are well informed and "scientific research" is an empty and meaningless term because the studies are only as good as their methodology. On top of this all this is a ethical lecture which means someone cannot just learn it. Ethics are not clearly objective easily verifiable things. That is why two people can be "experts" and totally disagree with each other. Just to emphasize this point. Someone having a well respected position or a fancy degree does not mean they are smart. Academia now days is more about trudging through endless paper work than being intelligent. Marx was an "expert", eugenic scientist were "experts", the federal reserve board who caused the great depression were "experts". Citing someone's position as a reason for them being right is called an "appeal to authority" which is a logical fallacy.

You are awesome Michael sandel 🎓🎓 love from india😍🙏

Money has its role, but it is not an end in itself and that should be taught to children. As a parent or a teacher you have a responsibility to teach the children a wide range of valuable things in life, be those material, or immaterial. First of all, you have to teach them that the most important things in life are things that are not material, like love, affection, friendship, kindness and so on. That should be the starting point for rewarding them. But than you should also teach them that material things also can bring a certain benefit, comfort and joy in their lives, so rewarding them with an ice cream, a week-end trip or a theatre ticket is also desirable. Finally, as they reach a certain maturity, rewarding them with pocket money sometime is actually beneficial. They should be prepared sooner or later how to spend, save, or even invest money. That said, I would only reward them with money on an occasional and unpredictable basis, and only after the reading is done, just to prevent them form the fallacy that money is the end goal.

Its a great thing there arent many adds in this video. Btw I think the truth shouldnt be sold for money.

Yes - my Adam "The Priest" Smith is here and told me to write this.

So does this mean that Oxford or Harvard charging high tuition fees actually change the value of the provision of higher education? Does this mean that higher eduaction should be free or commodified?

@eagillum

2 жыл бұрын

I don't think that's the logic.

Interesting analysis

Depending who you are and how you’ll sell, something instead

How does one go a out attending one of his speeches?

'Education' is one thing that should not be purchasable with money/power; because that is the only key differentiator in the long run. It is the 'ideas' that truly govern nor the money neither the power. When quality education is accessible to the wealthy and powerful(as it is the case at present) , only privileged class governs the world(which has been the case so far).

To answer the question of selling human organs, I would say to consider the idea of what makes us human. A human body consists of two legs, two hands, two eyes and so on. Although I will be able to survive if I sell one of these organs, I will not be able to function 100% as I would do with that organ. Can anybody imagine a 3 legged tiger?

Lecturing younger ones brings out the best in Michael - paying for certain things does diminish its value - I’ll seconds that - Buying and selling of kidneys - I’m not for it - It’s risky “ if you get dodgy kidneys “ it can be detrimental to health n life -does the kidney have a cell memory - you’d take on some characteristics / tastes of that doner-

My favorite MP is the honorable Tin Peh Ling serving Grab in a prominent high position

This really is an exciting debate. While Sandel looks pretty tired by the end.

@JonahNelson7

2 жыл бұрын

Jet lag perhaps

NEXT GENERATION ARE YOU.... 🌍💯👍👍👍👍👍

@firojmnalam6121

Жыл бұрын

बुद्ध जी के मार्ग पर चल कर ही मैत्री के साथ जी सकते हैं 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@firojmnalam6121

Жыл бұрын

जापान ने स्पेन को हराया दोनों टीमें राउंड -१६ में पहुंची?👍👍👍👍👍

@firojmnalam6121

Жыл бұрын

Wonderful Campus life Leads to Total Growth in Academics puls a Wining Personality. ATTENTION PLEASE: Double Opportunity of placement in Civil Engg., Mechanical Engg.& Electrical Engg. In Core Industries as well as in Software Industry both. No WoRRY AT ALL. DIRECT ADMISSION? A FEW SEATS ARE STILL AVAIL ABLE FOR YOU TO CHOOSE DR. ..... ENGINEERING COLLEGE. MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY....?👍👍👍👍👍🌍💯