An interpretation of "Nara" by E.S. Posthumus; used as the show's closing theme
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 14
@LCmusicBlog11 жыл бұрын
I just want to say I think this version fits perfectly to follow up the original, the beginning theme song.. It's so right on..-- like the first song proclaims itself, and this version is the universe echoing an answer.. like the 2 forces of all creation and existence now seen in the laboratory.. yin and yang.. dancing endlessly through the void, harmonizing through the vortices of plasma leaving flowing traces of colored light fading off into nothing as the fractal dimensions approach infinity
@dixi93611 жыл бұрын
this ending theme is better for me than the beginning theme !
@sandrinou869 жыл бұрын
Just beautiful!
@Richardiba13 жыл бұрын
@linzmoore You're welcome. I really enjoyed this re-imagining of the theme and would have loved it if Mr. Levine had made a longer version of the end credits. Till we find that one, this one should do :)
@eighthdoctor13 жыл бұрын
Love this; thanks for putting it up! :)
@joshpritt214619 күн бұрын
This reminds me of the Kinney era Warner Bros Television logo that appeared in 71 not on this show and the 1994 Warner Bros Television logo appeared in 1994 not on this show
@erikaac27127 ай бұрын
❤
@TheMiley250611 жыл бұрын
Extra!:>
@heartless8714513 жыл бұрын
thank you soo much for this nd btw where did you find it :)
@franckbertrandbooh8798 Жыл бұрын
I Can i look this version if follow first soundstrack i got feelings to More of music
@Richardiba13 жыл бұрын
@heartless87145 Just looked it up on Google...Need to get the rest of the Long-cut TV themes from that KMN remix edition!!!
@LCmusicBlog11 жыл бұрын
( i mean this respectfully)- what it seems you dont realize: interpretation is open to anything, as an artist, interpretaton is absolute artistic freedom, by definition,... no rules.. of course it would not be the same as the original, i think you were more wanting a remix.. or different version.. you literally can not ruin a song by doing an interpretation. the 2 things are separate and distinct entities, only sharing a relationship as the original was the inspiration for the interpretation.
@angelfabriciovargashernani64359 ай бұрын
1:30
@LCmusicBlog11 жыл бұрын
its sortof like saying picasso's abstract paintings are "wrong" and should be corrected to look like an exact, precise drawing of a photograph of the people's faces and things he painted.. do u see what i mean? but as a musical piece, this is Micheal Levine's art, and you're entitled to your own opinion of it, which of course can not be wrong. i hope this makes sense
Пікірлер: 14
I just want to say I think this version fits perfectly to follow up the original, the beginning theme song.. It's so right on..-- like the first song proclaims itself, and this version is the universe echoing an answer.. like the 2 forces of all creation and existence now seen in the laboratory.. yin and yang.. dancing endlessly through the void, harmonizing through the vortices of plasma leaving flowing traces of colored light fading off into nothing as the fractal dimensions approach infinity
this ending theme is better for me than the beginning theme !
Just beautiful!
@linzmoore You're welcome. I really enjoyed this re-imagining of the theme and would have loved it if Mr. Levine had made a longer version of the end credits. Till we find that one, this one should do :)
Love this; thanks for putting it up! :)
This reminds me of the Kinney era Warner Bros Television logo that appeared in 71 not on this show and the 1994 Warner Bros Television logo appeared in 1994 not on this show
❤
Extra!:>
thank you soo much for this nd btw where did you find it :)
I Can i look this version if follow first soundstrack i got feelings to More of music
@heartless87145 Just looked it up on Google...Need to get the rest of the Long-cut TV themes from that KMN remix edition!!!
( i mean this respectfully)- what it seems you dont realize: interpretation is open to anything, as an artist, interpretaton is absolute artistic freedom, by definition,... no rules.. of course it would not be the same as the original, i think you were more wanting a remix.. or different version.. you literally can not ruin a song by doing an interpretation. the 2 things are separate and distinct entities, only sharing a relationship as the original was the inspiration for the interpretation.
1:30
its sortof like saying picasso's abstract paintings are "wrong" and should be corrected to look like an exact, precise drawing of a photograph of the people's faces and things he painted.. do u see what i mean? but as a musical piece, this is Micheal Levine's art, and you're entitled to your own opinion of it, which of course can not be wrong. i hope this makes sense