Both have different roles hence IAF operates both platforms. One can't replace the other.

@TQI_IQT

9 ай бұрын

Same name 😅

@racing_mntage1584

9 ай бұрын

​@@TQI_IQTbruh thats dumb😂😂😂😂

@TQI_IQT

9 ай бұрын

@@racing_mntage1584 never seen same name so I thought...

@TheVagabond..

9 ай бұрын

They have Mi-26 but they don't use it anymore and hence are parked at Chandigarh Airbase..

@debdulalsenapati1391

9 ай бұрын

@@TQI_IQT Well there are many people with our name bro but it's ok if it makes you happy 🙂👍🏻✌🏻

Mi 26 can carry 2.5 times more load,so it consumes more fuel.

@dnate697

9 ай бұрын

No it can't 20 tons compare to 13.5 tons. Plus the chinook is faster, uses less fuel, is more dependable, and flies higher. Having both is an advantage though.

@E3kTheCat

9 ай бұрын

​@@dnate697in the video he says mi-26 carries 28 tons

@tubro541

9 ай бұрын

​@@dnate697I'm sure helicopter capable of lifting 28 tonnes is capable of flying higher than a helicopter that can only lift 13 tonnes, theoretically.

@Kanpuriye

9 ай бұрын

Bro teaches maths to maths teacher 🤦🏻 He says Mi28 uses 2.6 times fuel than chinook. Mi28 for 1 proportion of fuel - 28 tons Chinook for (its 1 proportion of fuel) - 13 tons But as Mi8 uses 2.6 times the fuel so multiply chinooks fuel by 2.6 . More specificaly Mi8 full tank = 2.6 times the full Tank of Chinook. So 2.6 times the trip with weight. Or 2.6 times the weight for the same trip. Chinook can do 2.6 rounds to transfer a total of around 32 tons or can do 2.6 times the distance of Mi28 for 13 tons. Simple maths hai yaar kya bekaar baate kar rahe ho Edit - you wrote Mi28 can carry 2.5 times of chinook 28/13 = 2.1 not 2.5 hence your answer is wrong.

@robertdeen8741

9 ай бұрын

I'd go with the tried and true Chinook.

just make sure to buy spare parts ahead of time because US might deny you of parts when you need it most.

@subhasishhore1575

9 ай бұрын

❤

@pankajnegi6860

9 ай бұрын

That's True. But I think we have already made contract for maintenance of them.

@subhasishhore1575

9 ай бұрын

@@pankajnegi6860 Try World War 2 history. Agreements between countries were broken many times.

@Legion-xq8eo

9 ай бұрын

US only denies ppl parts or help for one of two reasons, human rights atrocities or because ur in bed with our enemies!! And as far as the later is concerned I’m pretty sure ANY country would do that! Doesn’t make sense to supply weapons to someone who is helping out your enemies, let them buy weapons off those fucks

@pankajnegi6860

9 ай бұрын

@@subhasishhore1575 not like that but Licence Production of most of the parts.

India sent a satellite to sun with 75 mil dollar

All three Mi26 of IAF are out of order All 3 are standing at Chandigarh airbase with their blades removed

@alphabetagamma4142

8 ай бұрын

But why??

@sujitbala1492

8 ай бұрын

@@alphabetagamma4142 structural limitations perhaps

@GhoststoriesIND

7 ай бұрын

​@@alphabetagamma4142upgrade delayed due to Russia Ukraine war

@rickgolder6818

5 ай бұрын

They are not now. They are being redeployed in the current months. Also i believe that IAF have 4 MI26, not 3.

@NeebuCholistani

5 ай бұрын

@@rickgolder6818 dude I said this 3 months ago News of their overhaul is only a couple of weeks old And yes, IAF used to have 4 Mi26 but one of them crashed and now they only have 3

Mi 26 lifts 28 tons wow.....

Mi26 can lift ch46 chinuk😂

@theflamecoreguy7929

9 ай бұрын

Ch46 Is still better than mi26 india purchased mi 26 because of low budget Chinook is advance while Soviet weapons are outdated

@Thanuraj.Mysuru

9 ай бұрын

A chinook canlift another chinook too

@tubro541

9 ай бұрын

@@Thanuraj.Mysuru an mi26 can actually lift 2 Chinooks at once 🙂

@tubro541

9 ай бұрын

@@theflamecoreguy7929 mi26 is at least 15 years newer than the Chinook. I wonder what kind of bribes is boeing paid to get the Indians to buy their inferior helicopter.

@Thanuraj.Mysuru

9 ай бұрын

@@tubro541 yeahh

last i read three out of four Mi-26 helis are non operational due to non availability of parts.

@cptnTopNoodle

9 ай бұрын

They never mention that, cheap SWAG russians xD

@Azv8217

8 ай бұрын

WHERE DID YOU READ THAT ? SOURCES PLS...WE ARE FED UP WITH SCHAMS FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU...

@sujitbala1492

8 ай бұрын

@@cptnTopNoodlekeep crying. you only believe the russian equipment is cheap because you're being told that by western media sources. i pity you for believing such stuff on the internet that easily.

@hiteshadhikari

7 ай бұрын

the 3 have completed their service life and were to go to Russia for overhaul but due to war it was stopped, for now

@rickgolder6818

5 ай бұрын

Hence, india is making its own indigenous parts and spares and also now it doesn't need russian help in overhauling. And this is not the first. Since Ukraine war, india have found out that having indigenous spares is the only way, thats why india hve been upgrading nearly all of its russian orgin weapons by own, like SU30, Mig29, T72s and T90s, BMPs, Grad, etc etc.

More CC more ⛽ fuel..😅

@sakil8272

9 ай бұрын

Its turbine engine man

It's American bribe that makes actual difference in Indian military purchase. Obvious it was!

Bro literally went on to say helicofter without hesitation

You don't know what you're saying. One carries more than twice the weight of the other's. It's like comparing a tanker with an SUV!😂😂

Helicopter 75 million moon probe 73 million

On a lighter note , you know gujjus are running the country when the attack helicopter criteria is also our beloved “ kitni deti hai@ 🤪😂

More importantly, MI26 has poor availability records and parts are not available ... Many times, we have to cannibalize for spares. That is the only reason why we went for Chinooks.

@hiteshadhikari

9 ай бұрын

Thats what happens when u have a fleet of 4 choppers

@theidiotictroublemaker2281

8 ай бұрын

​@@hiteshadhikariwe don't need them most of the time which is why only 4. While attack heli like Apache and are in plenty compared to Pakistan but less infront of China but the focus of the army is in long distance warfare which is why artillery is in plenty compared to china

@hiteshadhikari

8 ай бұрын

@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 how do u compare a heavy transport helicopter with an attack helicopter?

@theidiotictroublemaker2281

8 ай бұрын

@@hiteshadhikari i went of topic. Anyways if u are going to compare heavy transport helicopter India is lacking in it but didn't need them because of the multi role druve heli which India use. But whatever I don't even feel like arguing so whatever.

@hiteshadhikari

8 ай бұрын

@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 do u understand the difference between an ALH , MLH and HLH? Have you ever seen these 3 types in person? Have you any idea of the roles and capabilities comparison of 3? Buddy stop

Missing Mi26 of India for a decade now😢

It’s a good practical solution based on constraints of the environment being operated in.

The russian big girl still can be a valuable tool to move equipment and a large number of soldiers in a secure area. It can operate perfectly in coordination with the ch 47. Mi 26 move the heavy stuff and large numbers to an intermediate point. For the ch 47 to move to the operating point. So it's a good decision to aquire it

There are many other reasons.. Not fuel.. Chinooks are faster, can travel to greater heights, lift multiple vehicles at a time, more manuevarable, robust in harsh climates... Etc etc

@zeusmultirotor8479

8 ай бұрын

Appartly the chinnoks are faster than attack helicopters like fhe appache

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

The Chinook is a better choice sure, but to give it the edge in harsh conditions, or any lifts is comcial 😅

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

​​@@zeusmultirotor8479It is, but empty

It's just business. Mi 26 was a need when it was procured. Now, because of USA, we're tempt to buy certain American weapons to just satisfy them.

The MI-26 is a maintenance nightmare.

It's not the fuel cost mr. It's due to availability rate.

Good video

So for 1 Chinook, you get 3 MI 26 helicopters. And the MI 26 can carry more than double the load of the Chinook. If these facts are correct, then for 75 million, you can lift either 13 tons or 84 tons!! While you can make some sort of case for use of Chinooks in specific areas and missions, it makes no sense to replace MI 26 with the Chinook. The two are in entirely different categories. Heavy lift capacity for forward deployment is a major factor for any army. If this is the real reason behind the decision to replace, then God help us. This is nonsense. It needs a Judicial inquiry to unearth possible bribes/commissions etc.

Chinook was purchased under pressure from USA even though servicing cost of any western equipment is much higher. Russian equipment is simply and easy to maintain

@chamonix4658

9 ай бұрын

no Mi26's in the IAF are flying right now, they are all out of service because they are unreliable and getting parts from Russia is impossible

@Antares_451

8 ай бұрын

​@@chamonix4658Don't try to educate stupid ppl especially when they're selling lies covered with hate..

A long service life increases service costs. It reduces replacement costs. I bet the MI26 carries three times as much fuel, cost of fuel cannot possibly be a concern with a helicopter costing tens of millions of dollars.

Salute to knowledge n hard work

We are using best tech of USA and Russia ❤ and also has our own LCA and dhruv for high altitudes ❤ More power to our nation❤ with lots of love

Energy efficiency is the ratio between the useful power supplied by a system and the power consumed by this system. The higher this ratio, the more efficient the system. For helicopters, useful power is lifting power, that is, the force exerted by the rotors to lift the helicopter and its payload. Power consumed is the power supplied by the engines, which depends on the fuel used. The Chinook has a lifting power of 7,000 KW and a power consumption of 5,590 KW (assuming 80% motor efficiency). Its energy efficiency is therefore 7000 / 5590 = 1.25. The Mi-26 has a lifting power of 14,450 KW (deducting 15% of the total power for the tail rotor) and a power consumption of 21,250 KW (assuming 80% engine efficiency). Its energy efficiency is therefore 14,450 / 21,250 = 0.68. We see that the Chinook is almost twice as energy efficient as the Mi-26. Fuel consumed per tonne transported is the ratio between the quantity of fuel used by a helicopter to carry out a mission and the total mass transported by that helicopter (including its own mass). The lower this ratio, the less fuel the helicopter consumes in relation to its payload. For simplicity, we assume that the helicopters use the same type of fuel (kerosene) and that they carry out the same mission (a 100 km round trip at an altitude of 3,000 m). The Chinook has an empty mass of 10,185 kg and can carry up to 11,340 kg of payload (taking into account fuel weight). Its total transported mass is therefore 21,525 kg. It consumes approximately 1.2 kg of fuel per kilometer traveled. Its total consumption for the mission is therefore 1.2 x 200 = 240 kg. Its fuel/tons transported ratio is therefore 240/21.525 = 0.011. The Mi-26 has an empty mass of 28,200 kg and can carry up to 20,000 kg of payload (taking into account the weight of fuel). Its total transported mass is therefore 48,200 kg. It consumes approximately 4 kg of fuel per kilometer traveled. Its total consumption for the mission is therefore 4 x 200 = 800 kg. Its fuel / tonnes transported ratio is therefore 800 / 48.200 = 0.017. We see that the Chinook consumes less fuel than the Mi-26 in relation to its payload. The Chinook is also lighter and obviously more agile and therefore better suited to mountainous terrain... In conclusion, the Chinook is significantly more energy efficient than the Mi-26 and more economical in terms of fuel consumption. The Mi-26 is just for raw power...otherwise the Chinook is better... Source: Bing

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

This is AI written nonsense right? The math doesn't even check out..

Atmanirbhar Bharat.

That is the unclassified version has that lift power

IAF is very Clever thats Why they Rejected Tejas at the first😂

High altitude is also there reason why we are adding LCH even when we have appache.

I think after imrh it would be changed

@naguok

9 ай бұрын

Imrh is medium left helicopter to replace mi17

@paramarcosandgarud4912

9 ай бұрын

@@naguok yeah I know but imrh will solve the problem of height suffering which most of Indian helicopter has but like in the case of lch, imrh will also don't suffer from height anxiety

@nikhilverma2647

9 ай бұрын

​@@paramarcosandgarud4912Indian helicopter lch, luh, alh have very good surface ceiling. It's just they aren't medium or heavy category.

@detectivesdelhi

9 ай бұрын

Only 3 are left with IAF

@hasnainmian3534

9 ай бұрын

1/3rd cost and double load carrying capacity .means 6 times more results ...but..still vying for an american machine ....reason is Boeing manufacturing in India both for Chinook and apache ...not the actual performance ....its always a wrong choice buying from a low bidder for war machines

There is absolutely nothing that you can buy from United States that will save you on maintenance

@antiwokehuman

9 ай бұрын

Yeah? Half of the su30 fleet is non functional. All good equipments require proper maintenance. Western fighters have better service availability and are way more capable. Their technology is just way ahead

@ahuman2613

9 ай бұрын

​@@antiwokehuman You forgot the maintenance cost. Western MIC is just cashgrab.

@antiwokehuman

9 ай бұрын

@@ahuman2613 no I didn't forget about maintenance. As i said, good equipments need proper maintenance. What we need to do to cut costs is to stop using 4 or 5 different types of platforms. Instead use max 2 platforms in high numbers. We need wuality equipments and russian stuff is just not good enough

@drejade7119

9 ай бұрын

F35 is literally the most cost effective fighter jet today. It might look like its not but compared to other and what it can do... You're saving so much that many countries who didnt think of buying it buy a fleet of it.

@chamonix4658

9 ай бұрын

​​@@ahuman2613literally all the IAF mi26s are out of service right now lol. Hard to get parts for the unreliable russian stuff

With cost comes reliability also

I live in USA west coast, I've always seen Chinooks flying in the skies here since I was a kid. But not lately

Plus Chinooks don't fall out of the sky for no reason 😂

SMART decision India.

American hardware is much better than Russian

@neldiokno7862

9 ай бұрын

MY AMERICAN FRIEND SHAKING HIS HEAD SAYING " NOT FULLY AGREE " RUSSIA HAS THE BEST MILITARY HARDWARE NOWADAYS AND CONFIRMED BY GERMAN FRIEND ALSO.

@amlandeka3970

9 ай бұрын

@@neldiokno7862 yes, Russian military hardware is the best which is why they already won the Ukraine war in 3 days Special Military Operation

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

​@@neldiokno7862Haha did you hear that on Russian TV? 😅

@neldiokno7862

8 ай бұрын

@not a seriousmoose The most tragic in AMERICAN CHARACTER IS THEIR FALSE FIRM BELIEF THAT THEY ARE PERPETUALLY SUPERIOR OVER OTHER NATIONS . PITY THESE PEOPLE AND SADLY THEY ARE IN REALITY VERY VERY ECONOMICALLY DOWN !

Look! Look! The IAF is buying the "Chinook"! Far, far it can fly and hover, And the Leh region it can "cover"! 😊☺🥰💪🏻👍

I thought Indians were smart. 75 million for the CH47. 50 million dollars can buy alot of fuel.

@sayantanghosh6246

9 ай бұрын

I appreciate your idea ☺️. I'm Indian

@PANKAJ-pp3vr

9 ай бұрын

There are other thing like safety factor and service cost includes, you need to factor thode too

@neldiokno7862

8 ай бұрын

TOO LARGE BRIBING AND ARM TWISTING TOOK PLACE ! REALLY THOUGHT INDIA IS VERY POLITICALLY SMART AND IMMUNE TO ARM TWISTING AND BRIBING ? GOD BLESS INDIA ...

@ex0duzz

7 ай бұрын

Smart but corrupt. USA love to ripoff their subordinates. India reliant on USA gps and other technologies. India signed BECA agreement with USA. Too scared to rely on Russia now due to China Russian having good ties and India being too weak and reliant on both China and Russia. So india go begging to USA and USA stroke India's ego to use them against China and also make big money selling them overpriced old equipment. While at the same time selling Pakistan f16 etc. There is no conflict with China, both sides cannot use even small arms, let alone heavy weapons. This got nothing to do with china alone. It's just a general transport helicopter and can use everywhere for everything.

@robinmaharjan102

6 ай бұрын

That why they call DHOTI 🇨🇮

Compare lifting abilities at high altitude. Availability of spare parts. Reliability and airframe hour limits.

Shoutout india mane, thats lil bro

IAF have Mi-26 in a very small number but they don't use it anymore and hence they are parked at Chandigarh Airbase..

upload more videos

Mil MI 26 NATO reporting name, "Halo".

Also it comes with military alliance with a powerful nation.

Chinook deal proposed in MMS era...

In warfair , fuel is the difference and india must be ready

When a country has more enemies on almost all sides, it has to spend more money to upgrade its military and navy!!! Everything comes with a bigger price tag!!! 😢😮😢😮😢😮😢😮😢😮😢.

India’s strategy is pretty strong! When it comes to war, India is basically the city of Troy! No one can penetrate from northern region, when we slept they attacked in the past…not anymore😂😂😂 India shown middle finger to great alexander and Genghis khan🔥

They don't really have a need for something that powerful anymore but they still use them though

Good Russian helicopter

Cost effective 👌.

@jamesroy791

9 ай бұрын

No not at all Fuel cost will eventually average the Chinook helicopter

@Xer405

8 ай бұрын

​@jamesroy791 They need the helicopters now, though, as their mi 26's are all grounded due to lack of maintenance

@jamesroy791

8 ай бұрын

@@Xer405 didn't know that makes sense

India stopped using Helo for a very long time. They're stranded, stripped of their rotors, at the Chd base.

One Chinook Costed As Much As One ISRO's Mission To Moon

@TheLunacyofOurTimes

7 ай бұрын

Maybe India should try to develop its own military grade heavy lift helicopters then. I doubt this would work well for at least 30 years.

@imlitakaanghly5379

7 ай бұрын

@@TheLunacyofOurTimes Which They Are, Thanks For The Head's Up

Mi 26 can carry 20 tons, not 28 tons.

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

Its listed at 28200kg empty and 56000kg max takeoff. So no, it seems you are wrong

Mi-26 can lift 2 Chinooks at the same time 🗿

@cptnTopNoodle

9 ай бұрын

If it ever takes off. If. IF. iF. Cus russia doesnt produce most soviet-era parts of it anymore. And Ukraine would do, sure, if not a war

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

​@@cptnTopNoodleYeah, its quite comcial how many (now) Russian systems are dependent on logistic chains involving Ukriane.

@sujitbala1492

8 ай бұрын

@@cptnTopNoodlethe Russians barely use their Mi-26s now. they moved on but the main reason is simply the use. we dont need such a huge heavy lift chopper, a mh-47 or a mi-17 can do the job just as well

@voltagedoesit1136

7 ай бұрын

Dont you only have 3? And arent they all non-op

Besides, Chinook has higher Service Ceiling.

happening only because of #modiji

is there any subsidy if we buy 1 for personal use in village area

After all these millions of dollars We didn't know HOW India's CDS was killed in a Helicopter Crash.

Every heard of inflation with time my guy?

Leh and ladakh are different places?

Mi-26❤

Indian government and the general public having some inferiority complex. This is the problem.

Wait, till we start mfg

But Modi Govt Will Generate Bill 25 million more per Helicopter 🚁.....in the Bill book... That's why....👍...Its Reality

Tomorrow, India will be manufacturing the Chinooks themselves 😂🎉

👌👌👍💪💪🇮🇳🇮🇳🇷🇺🇷🇺

@shoo8873

9 ай бұрын

Bipin Rawat

@Legion-xq8eo

9 ай бұрын

Your country doesn’t seem to agree with u, if so they’d buy more MI-26s to sit at the airfield inoperable. US tech might cost more but at least it works and u can get parts for it!!

@Legion-xq8eo

9 ай бұрын

When China raids your country go ask for Russias help then and not the US!! Let them save ur asses. I wouldn’t hang my hat on being ally’s with them as they will always pick China to protect their own interests because they don’t want the China smoke 💨

@kingping3933

9 ай бұрын

​@@Legion-xq8eo👍🏻👍🏻

Because it uses rocket science class 🎉

I don't think mi26 will cost 50 million dollars on fuel

IAF wants to fund us companies so here we go

Next time use midlife systems and refurbish

To clear you a fact leh is in ladakh Leh and Ladakh are not any separate places.

How does the single propeller lift more than chinooks double propellers? I wish they explained that because now I’m interested

@NotASeriousMoose

8 ай бұрын

Because the Chinook has two engines with about 3500 kW each, while the Mi26 has two with about 8300 kW each. More power, more lift

And the stallion is where

Since when did American equipments cost less maintenance. A year of maintenance for American equipments are equivalent to 3 to 5 years for equipments from other countries.

And 🇷🇺mi 26 is not only ⅓ the cost of a 🇺🇲Chinook ($50 million cheaper than chinook), it is a much more, capable (over twice the lifting capacity as chinook) and much more versatile aircraft, even being used as a civilian airliner... I don't see any airlines using the Chinook. There must be some other reasons why India is buying the inferior and less capable Chinooks at 3 times the price.

mil 26 by far better

BRICS vs BRICS and we are supposed to be worried about their new currency?

The guy who is pushing guys in the China and India fighting scenes is an Indian soldier. India never fights first but when it does, our fighters hit back hard. This is reality you trust or not but is it reality

I think it also has to do with India not wanting to be dependent on Russia. USA isn't a great partner by any stretch, but far less volatile than Russia at the moment

And main point is chinook don't need flat surface to land like other helicopter... chinook can stop at slant surface and hold due to is double horizontal rotor...

50 years? No scrapping policy for 20 years?? Gadkari.

Problem with American aviation is, expensive, and repairs are much much more than other aviation, plus very very complicated to operate

@chamonix4658

9 ай бұрын

no Mi26's in the IAF are even working right now, they are unreliable and hard to get parts for due to the war

Doti Say Power Than Blablablabla 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Y bcos.. So that more money can be earned by politicians

Use indian parts / vehicles 🙏🏻⭐

Not ture. It's not about fuel consumption it's slowly slowly switching from Russia weapon to USA weapon under pressure.

thier pilot can't even save thier army chief 😂😂😂😂

@neldiokno7862

8 ай бұрын

BEST WAY TO SELL INDIA THOSE OVERRATED CHINOOKS. RUSSIANMi-26 ARE FAR FAR MORE RELIABLE AND FITS ASIAN TERRAIN ESPECIALLY INDIA'S AERIAL TERRITORY. HAD A SCALE MODEL OF CHINOOK WITH ME AT PRESENT BUT NOW I WANTED TO HAVE ONE OF RUSSIA'S Mi-26

@neldiokno7862

8 ай бұрын

AND OTHER RUSSIAN CHOPPERS. EARLIER THOUGHT US CHOPPERS WERE .SUPERIOR BUT TO MY DISAPPOINTMENT IT'S THE REVERSE.

Why can’t the indian military upgrade the mil28 ?

Mi-26 has been grounded since a long time due to maintenance issues.

Chinhook only usable to lift soldiers after failing miserably in Vietnam and Afghanistan What is HAL doing from 70 years ...still we need to buy from outside 140 crore ppl and we cant produce is a big shame

Which one is good idea to buy ( first one or sec one )⁉️ government become empty

@aviationwithebin2121

9 ай бұрын

2nd one because I'm not even sure if the first one is in service

Super heavy lift and heavy lift

US stuff are always more expensive and marginally superior technology wise to Russian made stuff. However such sums of money attracts “bees” and thereafter everything gets justified! 😊

Why does it cost three times more because it's three times better :)

Also business scam😅