Even though it’s nice to see the eyes, it’s gonna look like someone is trapped inside the armor in a Hall of Armors display 😂

I love the helmeted head. Too many shades of gold - if it all looked shiny like the legs that would have been great. I am not a fan of the fat-face Tony Stark head. Sorry about your antenna. I think the original id the cooler-looking figure, but if I find this on a good sale, I'll probably grab one. Thanks for the review.

What if… this was a BAF wave instead! Gold Iron Man-head Iron Man IX-right arm Iron Man XX-left arm She-Hulk-chest & back Carnage-torso Whiplash-right leg Count Nefaria-left leg BAF: Hulkbuster (Retro version)

@freemind6954

26 күн бұрын

Hasbro would rather release the Hulkbuster separately and make an additional 59.99 off of us

So Retro Hulk wave when ?

It’s time Hasbro gave us a HULK with forward butterfly joints that can do the thunderclap.

Dull figure, looks more like a kids toy robot

For some reason the torso on the original grey version matches the rest of the figure better than this gold one. The gold one just looks dull. A shame as I always liked this armour. Both armours suffer from small head syndrome. No way Tony could fit his noggin in that. I think the 1960's "Mad Men", Tony head would suit this better than the better than the 1970's porn tashe "Charles Bronson" head. Hasbro skimping on the paint again is very cheap and annoying. Niggles aside I've always liked this armour, so if I found it reduced I'd be tempted.

@HistorySkate

Ай бұрын

What do you mean by “niggles”? 🤨🤨🤨

@MCUcollector24

Ай бұрын

Just saw a TikTok about the word “niggles”

This head, in my opinion, came wrong!! They should have used the 80 year old version that has the style of the 60s!! That Charles Bronson-looking head doesn't match at all!!