Thanks. My god if my economics teacher would just show this video instead of going "uhm" for 60+ minutes, the time of my lectures could be cut in half. YOU ARE DOING GOD'S WORK MY FRIEND

@heyitsmemarkokicko

4 жыл бұрын

lmao my teacher uses all his videos.

@bogaziciliceohaluk

3 жыл бұрын

DUDE YOU HAVE TRANSLATED MY FEELİNGS EXACTLY... THE GUY CANT SPEAK AND HE JUST SAYS HIMMM IIIIII UHMMM FOR LİKE 2 HOURS AND SPEAKS FOR 10 MİNUTES smh.............

@kmit9191

2 жыл бұрын

this is mostly due to the fact you've already listened to it before in class, so your brain is not in a state of being bombarded with information. You're looking up this certain topic in order to understand something you've already encountered problems with.

@rebeccacole6954

2 жыл бұрын

@@kmit9191 That's a nice idealistic theory, but not necessarily true. I work in higher education and I've seen plenty of professors struggle to get their points across in a timely manner or coherent. I myself purposely am trying to avoid lecture based classes for this very reason. Many teachers and professors should not be in the positions that they are in or should really take another public speaking/speech class. I've been in a number of classes where an instructor struggled to get through the material they themselves were presenting through no fault of the students. Not to say all teachers are bad or that this is always the case BUT it's wrong to try to claim that it's because of that particular reason.

This video is way better than my textbook which promised to show us "less graphs and more plain English."

So helpful! I learned more from this video than from my textbook (which makes everything overly complicated). Thank you!

@jigishadebnath564

4 жыл бұрын

hiii you are now in college isnt it?

@KaiserNick375

3 жыл бұрын

@@jigishadebnath564 ✌ yes

I notcied that you haven't monetiised any of your videos. This is no joke, given the amount of efforts which go into making such videos. You are making an impact in the field of education on a global level. God bless you

Man I love you. I'd give up school and just simply watch all your vid.

@rakhijha6834

10 ай бұрын

Insta id?

I'm starting my undergraduate studies in Economics, and I had very similar questions and doubts as you do at first, so I thought I'd offer what perspective I've gained from about half a year or so of study. It's basically determined empirically, by looking at data about consumer behavior. It's obviously more complicated in real life because there are so many more decision factors, but a simple example would be to look a person with a $100 budget, and see how they choose to spend that money.

Because of you that I learned and understood this topic the most! Thank you khan academy 🎉🎉🎉

you explained this concept extremely well, thank you so much!!! :)

The reason he spent the 5th dollar on the 60 was because the MU of fruit was 120 for two dollars. So the 4th and 5th dollar went towards that. If the 5th dollar went to the 50 than the MU would only be 110 in total.

@kaypalmboom

6 жыл бұрын

Mistermo716 Gefeliciteerd jij bent mijn vogel!

beautifully understood your teaching process ....... the best learning platform KHANS ACADEMY

thank you this was extremely useful, all the other vids on this topic just confused me more

Can we say that cardinal utility offers a technique to measure the utility whereas ordinal utility introduces two bundles from which we can derive the utility of goods by standing to the preferences. I mean, let assume that we are given two bundles (x1;x2) and (y1;y2). If consumer prefers (x1;x2) rather than (y1;y2), we can come to the conclusion that utility of the preferred bundle is higher than the rejected one. In a word, in cardinal utility, the end result is a matter of numbers while in the ordinal utility the result depends on the preferences.

Watching this video is definitely better than reading the textbook over and over again. I‘ve read that for 3 times, it’s till now when i get the meaning of spending the money rationally.

Thank you for breaking this down

awesome! i finally understand comparisons are being made between two goods by looking at their marginal utility per price of respective good. something textbooks seemingly can't explain well!

Arghrghargh it always bothers me how concepts in economics doesn't seem completely tied down in reality! But thank you for the video, Khan, as usual. YOU ARE AN AMAZING HUMAN BEING!

YOU deserve 1000000000000 subscribers man!!!!!

Thank you so much! I did not really understand until this video

Thankyou for such help

The only reason I'm going to pass this exam is because of you. Thanks!

Thank you for your explanation. My problem with economics is that it's not an exact science, yet it's considered as so because it's used to shape national policies. The fact that the most accepted theory of value is extremely subjective -can't be mathematically determined- is enough to tell me how economics as a pseudo science are actually not the proper way to conduct an real economic system. I've been studying some planned economy systems and they seem interesting. Let's see how it goes.

Thank u so much sir for spreading this wonderful knowledge ❤

sal.... my iPad is full of you. thank you for your service!

This was brilliant thank you so much ☺️

god bless you, you should make your own school or university you’d really make a huge difference in this world if you would

@shockwave2477

4 жыл бұрын

he already is

"chocolated out" aha very informative. excellent video

Thank you so much I understand it very well ❤❤❤❤

Good explanations

Am I wrong in that when economics study utility, they only look at a single util unit, rather than multiple? If so, I am seeing there is incomplete in understanding value. Why not have multiple util types, which you can increase or decrease based on what is impacted?

Many thanks - very useful.

Sir what if the customer's craving for fruit decreases as he goes on consuming chocolates? Would the utility values for fruit vary accordingly for every decrease in the utility of chocolates? Thank you!!

Thank you! That really helped me! ))

Kool a nice reminder to my stage one economics classes in uni.

thanks for the help.

لعل القارئ يصلى على النبى عليه الصلاة والسلام فيزيدنى درجة و يزداد درجات

this is so helpful thnak you sir

Is there anything he doesn't know too much about! Very Inspiring

beauuuuuuutiful explanation

كلمتان خفيفتان على اللسان ثقيلتان في الميزان حبيبتان إلى الرحمن سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم

this is incredibly good

thanks for making me love econ

So useful Thanku very much.

Thanks alot, this was very helpful :)!

nice lecture

bam you just answered my assignment thank you

Well explained

Utility is measured often with the help of the 'unit' 'Utils'.

cool stuff!!!

totally love this

What about when you don’t consume the good immediately but instead safe/stock it up? Then the utility increment won’t decrease no?

This is a very interesting video; I also made a video where I have discussed the best way to answer economics in a school setting.

It's really good 👍👍

So tell me why my school specifically told me that they do not recommend Khan Academy as an external resource for Microecon..... LOL well here I am. Thanks!

You better save your last dollar for the dentist.

This was helpful

So to make it clearer we can use the marginal utility to calculate the total utility?

thanks that helped

i wonder if we are all taking the same microecon class

Thank you for the video, but if I could ask something. I might be confused a bit. I understand the diminishing marginal utility. In the example, if you spent the last 2 remaining dollars on the the chocolate, wouldn’t that be 80 mu points (40 x $2). Which is more than 40 points in $2 worth of apples? Or am I thinking of it too much and missing the point? Lol

this is helpful

I would like you to talk about marginal benefits in a human being studying for A test with x time left before test expiration

Thankyou

This is a problem I am having trouble with... If the Marginal utility of the last crumpet consumed is 64 utils and the price of tea and crumpets is 8 and 16 respectively, what was the marginal utility of the last cup of tea consumed?

1 - سبحان الله 2- الحمدلله 3- لا إله إلا الله 4- الله اكبر 5- لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله 6- ربي اغفر لي 7- سبحان الله وبحمده 8- سبحان الله العظيم 9- اللهم نجني من عذابك يوم تبعث عبادك 10- اللهم صل وسلم على نبينا محمد.....

man I love you

@jorgianamaria

7 жыл бұрын

ikr!

@user-wh5gx9lt9d

5 жыл бұрын

How does he knows all these things and knowledge!!!!!!!???

What if you get that chocalate for free , what would be the MU/ P ? It has to be undefined because of Number / O equals to undefined. How do we have to express that undefined situation in economics ? -sorry for bad english-

How do you decide the value of the marginal utility if you dont have the total utility?

Appetite Satiation Unit Points

Why did you spend 4 and 5 on the pound of fruit? After you spent the 4th dollar on half a pound of fruit at MU of 60, wouldn't the next highest MU be 50 for the fruit? So you would still have bought half a pound of fruit with the 5th dollar, but wouldn't that be for MU of 50?

I have an assignment here, can you help me out? why is average utility always higher than marginal utility except for the first unit. Thanks

For chocolate bars why it is not being divided by 2????

Sal, I think your video contains an error in the last part of it. You used two Dollars to get 60 U/$ while each dollar on its own can get you 60 U/$. The fruits are more expansive but you already divided 120 by two. I may be wrong so this is more of a question that a critic. Other than that thank you for enlightening us :)

10:47 are they both 60 points per dollar or does the 60 point for a fruit cost $2? I got a little confused there.

at 6:34 wouldnt the total utility be 120 + 120 + 100? because of the 100 being additional to it?

hindi ya urdu me b upload karein khan sahab

what do the calculations in white represent?

Quick question, for marginal utility curve, is there a logical explanation for why the gradient often decrease?

@DishonoredGOD

2 жыл бұрын

It's the law of diminishing marginal utility. You've probably figured it out now since its been 5 years.

@joesr31

2 жыл бұрын

@@DishonoredGOD yup haha, already graduated a year ago, thanks though

Comment pt3: in the end, it's not exact, and it never can be totally perfect in measuring satisfaction. But to use a metaphor my Econ101 professor used, Economics is like a map for understanding human/societal behavior. A map of your neighborhood, for example, does actually capture all the details of your 'hood. Rather, it highlights what's important: the roads and intersections and distances; and leaves out what's not: the curvature of the earth, buildings, number of lanes, etc.

Case in point: Quantitative data is useless unless the qualitative data the numbers represent has real, concrete meaning.

when i took econ... my teacher was good at making simple thing way to complicated...

this was very helpful thank you!! but pls differentiate total utility from marginal utility because it's kind of confusing :/

@innanninna

10 жыл бұрын

total utility is the sum of marginal utilities you get per bundle of good.ata? if my understanding serves me right

Comment Pt2: So when the consumer is down to his last $10, does spend that on Chocolate bars or on Fruit? If he spends it on Chocolate bars, then that tells me that he values chocolate bars more and therefore derives more utility from that additional chocolate bar than if he had bought an additional piece of fruit. Smooth this out over many different decisions, and you can make a "utility function," where the units of utility are not important so long as decisions are consistent along the curve

God.. thank you for using english to explain this!!!

We're getting 120 utility points for first pound of fruits, now with the increase of quantity the marginal utility is decreasing... By this way marginal utility for (1/2) pound of fruits should also be greater than 60... Isn't it?

My problem with economists is theycompletely skipped the stage of observation. Early Greek astronomers noted the position of all the stars in the sky with such detail that they noticed that some stars moved in relation to the constellations - aka planetes, or "wonderers" for Greek. People then measured the exact position of those planets; this data allowed Newton to develop the law of universal gravitation. Economists seem to be at the stage where they think that "stars move from east to west."

Yeah the 4th and 5th dollar were spent on fruit because he could have spent the 4th dollar on the 40 utils of chocolate but that would leave him with one dollar (the 5th dollar) that he couldn't spend on fruit. So 60 > 40.

Minor correction: marginal utility is always positive, not zero or negative. In other words, having more of a good is assumed to always be a good thing. See the microeconomics "rule of non-satiation".

@FXFXFXFX

7 жыл бұрын

Daniel Paulk no, MU can be negative, but this level of economic analysis isn't used in the real world anyway. E.g. Consuming pizza until you have diabetes, each additional slice therefore actually kills you and would be calculated as negative marginal utility

Can i put it to you that with your final 2 dollars, it would have more marginal utility to spend $1 on the chocolate bar giving you a MU of 40 and $1 on a half pound of fruit, giving you a MU of 30 i'd assume which adds up to a MU of 70 rather than the 60 coming from just the fruit?

Does this law apply to money?

Just like many other economics theories, this concept too is nearly useless for practical purposes, because from where will I get my Marginal Utility statistics? Also, I do love economics though.

I love economics

please give all economics lecture on bangla language

@shauryasongara1851

4 жыл бұрын

vele baithe hai kya chutiye

when i took econ... my teacher was good at making simple things complicated... like this.. if kahn was my teacher i would have understood utility in 12 minutes not 2 class sessions :P

Pls xplain in hindi

Am i the only one who thinks that this video can be 3 minutes long instead of 12?

11 mins in, wouldn't 2q choco be worth $2 instead of 1 (on your $5 spend?), you select 1, 2 and 3 quantities for your first 3 $, but that would $6 worth surely?

Actual observations of what primitive economies looked like suggest that economists are completely wrong about their assumptions about how trade works. "Debt: The First 5000 Years" lists some really interesting observations.

wht is marginal utility sir??

I love economy

I dont believe that marginal utility can be negative. Actually, owning a good or a service does not mean that we have to consume it (for instance, owning or buying many cookies does not necessarily imply that we will have to eat all of them). So, I think the lowest possible value of MU is zero. Why do we need to assume that rational individuals would literally consume the good or service if they know, ex ante, that it would harm them or decrease their satisfaction level !!! What about the preference propriety: "More is Better"???