If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► kzread.info More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇 ► kzread.info/dash/bejne/lImbw7GuqNC7ndY.html

3:38 "Ammo storage hit we're lucky didn't blow" World of Tanks comander sound

@blizz94it70

4 жыл бұрын

True dude

@josephstalin9712

4 жыл бұрын

Correct comrade

@idiotwholikestanks539

3 жыл бұрын

The Abrams has blowout panels anyway

I’m getting some World in Conflict vibes from this

@fabio6170

5 жыл бұрын

Yep but WiC was M1a1ha vs T 80u

@MasterSteve_117

5 жыл бұрын

Wish they Made a sequal :(

@bryan-7997

5 жыл бұрын

@@fabio6170 Ehh, close enough. I mean vs Ai for me is M1s vs T-72s

@user-pf3kv4bv5s

5 жыл бұрын

There was T-62a

@JeanLucCaptain

5 жыл бұрын

yes! LET DO THAT!

Pls make fun video about : 1 Yamato Battleship vs 100 Black Pearl pirate ships

@netizenkuripangistanyolo3339

5 жыл бұрын

Yes

@MsTheGreatD

5 жыл бұрын

Nice idea XD

@user-dd9ow8ze6h

5 жыл бұрын

wtf

@norbertosaliedo6429

4 жыл бұрын

,good idea

@idealist4910

4 жыл бұрын

The pirateships cant even harm a vessel why should you send them against a battleship? Boring fight

Just send in 100 more T-72s. If it does not work then send in 120 T-80Us, if it doesn’t send in 200 T-90s, if that and all else fails..... send in the KV-2

@marciopantaleaoghiu2774

5 жыл бұрын

If that does not work send the 203 mm Stalin's Sledgehammer nuke Launchers. Didn't work? A Tsar should do It Not yet? Throw vodka

@fadedgam3r

5 жыл бұрын

my god thats probably what stalin actually said when the germans invaded

@yeetosyeeterofyeet1825

5 жыл бұрын

23rd Century Fax and Fax SearchLight Pictures You ruined the fucking joke you idiot

@tiagomorais5415

5 жыл бұрын

M1ABRAMS COMMANDER: Oh shit!... The KV-2 is here...

@CalRizz

5 жыл бұрын

Oh NO NOT THE KV-2

Why do I find the ricochet noises so satisfying?

@djliottchannel6416

4 жыл бұрын

Why shouldn't you ?

@ddaazahh8064

3 жыл бұрын

I find the gun firing noises satisfying.

@endutubecensorship

3 жыл бұрын

The sound of still being alive

*Assuming American Forces Would 'Attack' In A Single Column*

@Crankiebox99

5 жыл бұрын

SHERIFF HOTDOG lol true

@andrewluchsinger

5 жыл бұрын

You are right they would not have attacked that way.

@andrewluchsinger

5 жыл бұрын

@@GBR9794 Are you saying that they would attack in single file?

@cnlbenmc

5 жыл бұрын

Or without artillery and air support, or mechanized infantry.

@mamarussellthepie9745

5 жыл бұрын

Always flanking

I like the difference between the nation's priorities just by watching how tanks are destroyed. Most of the Abrams that are knocked out the crew is able to bail out before the tank suffers a catastrophic explosion, the T-72 not so much. The Russians cared more about fielding more tanks, the Americans cared about having crews be able to get out of a tank.

@berkay9888

2 жыл бұрын

Yea in russian tanks there is a auto loading sytem which is make them get killed just by one hit but in hulldown position m1a2's are cant kill them like this irl i beileve

@Vityaz777

2 жыл бұрын

Listen bro. I recommend you read about Igor' Ahpashev - Hero of Russian Federation. He's tank start burn , but he nit leave out tank , but contune the battle in fire tank(T72)

@Vityaz777

2 жыл бұрын

@@berkay9888 . Abrams heavy tank . He's tactic - stay and shoot(tank of defens) T72 medium tank. Tank offensive . He's tactic - move and shoot . And our roads is bad, because when tank shake , not comfortable reload it heand. Will be better autoreload. And t72 pilled well on abrams , despite the fact abrams is obviously stronger

@berkay9888

2 жыл бұрын

@@Vityaz777 well still t72's has massive turret armour so

@Vityaz777

2 жыл бұрын

@@berkay9888 I do not argue. But in an open battle, T72 has much less chances (I'm a patriot, I just don't deny the obvious). In this battle, T72 dug in and, in fact, only his tower was visible, which is a strong point. but if the Abrams were already on the defensive, then the outcome of the battle would have been much sadder (for T72, of course). by the way at the expense of the automatic loader. did you see how many shells ricocheted from the t72 tower? these are all blows, contusions and disorientation are possible. the advantages of the automatic loader also lie in the fact that under any conditions the charger is faster(i hope you'll understand me , my english a little better , than yours russian))

Alright, we'll call it a draw. Come, Patsy!

@paddy7812

4 жыл бұрын

HAVE AT YOU!!!

Since it's an assault scenario and not a simple "something vs something else on plain ground", I believe that the T-72 team won. The Abrams failed to pierce their lines, and only 1 of them survived undamaged.

@jaroslavdudas7227

3 жыл бұрын

True

@stmordi

2 жыл бұрын

@@jaroslavdudas7227 yeee, but it's fun to see tho? Also, I'm sure commanders have gone thru this scenario.

@aldrichcruz9321

2 жыл бұрын

Not exactly the Abrams have better mobility with the AGT Honeywell Gas Turbine Engine has incredible speed which outflank the T 72 the the gun is M256A1 is a high velocity gun piercing up to 600 or 660 which is capable of hitting a crew

@proudlydegenerated

Жыл бұрын

@@aldrichcruz9321 it wont pierce its first shots thanks to the era and the t72 has a higher velocity and caliber even though it has lower oenetration it will cause big damage once it pierces

@aldrichcruz9321

Жыл бұрын

@@proudlydegenerated you stupid or what

NICE , In the 70's worked for a company that helped build the first M1 prototypes, We did R&D developments and testing equipment .......🇺🇸

Next T-72 vs Leopard 2 or M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 .

Abrams in open fields vs T-72's hull down in revetments and the Abrams still killed more

@zhongxina4935

5 жыл бұрын

Not each t72 be in revetments

@tomic0046

5 жыл бұрын

Its just a game

@crnorizechrabar4879

5 жыл бұрын

Heh but 9 out of 10 of those Abrams are sitting ducks now, and with one more Abram working, the T 72s will finish them off eventually

@scudb5509

5 жыл бұрын

This is a game. Many complain that the accuracy of Russian tanks in this game is underestimated. But, I think this was a relatively accurate finish. T-72B3 are not that modern. Only better armour and slightly improved optics. Besides, these tactics have not been used by Russia since the introduction of UAVs. Realistically that position would’ve been bombed two days ago before the American column would’ve made it there. And the US wouldn’t advance without air and helo cover. As for the defender, if the tanks were dug in, they should’ve also had ATGM support. Like Egypt had during the operation Badr, where they destroyed hundreds of counter attacking Israeli tanks. This is a very unrealistic scenario. Maybe in WW2 it would’ve worked, but not today.

@Geworfenheit

5 жыл бұрын

Hull down is less safe. Especially if you a degenerative T-72

0:38 He told, that he see light tank. Abrams. 60 tonns. Light tank.

@vidmantasvalaitis392

4 жыл бұрын

This is due to stress (tunnel vision)

@Tanker000

3 жыл бұрын

Abrams is a medium tank. Light tanks don't have armor to block hits

@frankiecalsone8536

3 жыл бұрын

👽

The Abrams can accurately hit while on the move, so very unlikely they would have stopped to fire, becoming static targets.

@MikeSmith-ok2ci

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah not everyone wants to go first you see.

@eliasziad7864

Жыл бұрын

Bumpy terrain plus hills, ik cus of war thunder.

@rebelliousfew

Жыл бұрын

So can the more modern Russian tanks. Stabilized turrets are nothing new.

New video:I look the notification and I look the video. new video:Amazing

I dont really know about specifics of which tank is better but when it comes to modern combat you would never really see tanks fighting alone with eachother,the americans would probably have air support and infantry with ifvs and apcs backing them and so would the Russians.But aside from that I love your vids man.good work.

@hx20games77

2 жыл бұрын

Well yes but if tank v tank well abrams is supierior just not sure about new tanks loke T14 but M1A3 well

@alsa3ka166

2 жыл бұрын

@@hx20games77 that's the thing the t72 is a soviet tank not russian it never intended to be better then the abrams they are made to be easy to manufacture cheap and reliable and its great for it price In real life if the war between the soviet and USA happened It will be like. 1 abrams vs 25 t72. In average and the winner is clear

@jakiwijaya7316

2 жыл бұрын

@@alsa3ka166 nah, would be 1 Abrams vs 2 modernized T72 if you compare it by its price. And on both tank, sideshot would 90% kill them.

@alsa3ka166

2 жыл бұрын

@@jakiwijaya7316 remember abrams are not easy to transport to there wight sooo On the east Europe front it will take a month even more to the us to deploy all assets from tanks. While the soviet can just rush there forces straight to Europe. That why i told you it will be like 1to 20_25. The winner is clear Second soviet t72 can pen the front lower hall with apsdf. Or overpresur the tank driver with He + ATGMs for longer distance then the abrams

@jakiwijaya7316

2 жыл бұрын

@@alsa3ka166 i see

Could you do a modern warfare scenario of NATO vs USSR full urban combat with tanks, infantry, artillery, aircraft etc in Berlin, Warsaw, Paris, etc

Mr. WarfareGaming, did the damage inflicted by the T-72B3's on 9 M1A2 Abrams just minor or did a considerable one to stop these tanks on offense?

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

Usually, I don't point out damaged tanks but for this specific scenario, I wanted to. So one out of 10 were fully operatable, other 9 had some part damaged, mainly tracks, then engine and some main gun damaged. Suddenly both sides stopped engaging each other so that's when I called end.

Dutch armoured car ambush on german panzer convoy!

@officerbarbrady8387

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah that wouldn't be much of a fight lol

@twandepan

5 жыл бұрын

Logan Krinock we’d be so high they can never hit us! (I’m Dutch)

@officerbarbrady8387

5 жыл бұрын

@@twandepan lol. Sorry I didn't mean any offense by my comment.

@twandepan

5 жыл бұрын

I didn’t take any offence though I was just joking ;)

@bolek1792

5 жыл бұрын

There is no mod for dutch vechicles

I really like how do you film the Battle. Is amazing!!! Can you do a tutorial explaining how do you film It????

0:37 "watching movement of light tank" - oh really? And what kind of tank does he think heavy?

@daatskiy_23

4 жыл бұрын

так он не шарит по русскому)

and then the M1 tanker Abrams woke up ...... and wondered if that were in reality.

The seem like equal opponents in this game. My only pretension is to T-72B3's variant: if it is countering M1A2, not M1A1HA, it should be of 2016, and the one that you used is of 2013.

4:37 the soldier xd

@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088

3 жыл бұрын

Pistols>tank

@person-ie4px

3 жыл бұрын

@@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088 xd

I love the barrels it has Phly daily’s boom your dead quote

2:01 tank name "Concrete Uterus"

2:08 Uncle Sam says Hi!

@amirzafri5306

5 жыл бұрын

Hi

Basically the moral of the story: terrain could compensate for lack of technological advantage. NB: In all those videos, T72s like never use ATGMs. Why?

@joaolimao9381

5 жыл бұрын

I think hes trying to make it even I think

@joserodrigues-gr6yx

5 жыл бұрын

My first tought. They have the capability to fire missiles from miles away before the Abrams can even fire. Why they never use them in this videos?

@joaolimao9381

5 жыл бұрын

again, hes making it even, no advantages to either tank

@joserodrigues-gr6yx

5 жыл бұрын

But the Abrams as advantage on the armour. So, why not make it really even and give the advantage to the T72 to start firing way before?

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

First two shots T-72s fired were ATGMs. The scene when Abrams get hit the first time, you can see those ATGM projectiles moving towards them much slower compared to APFSDS that you bearly see. You can actually see that on several other scenes as well. I wanted to include a scene that would clearly show up ATGM but it wasn't perfect so it didn't find use here.

@warfaregaming could I request 50 American t95 turtles vs 50 Duetch Maus

@silvanag1103

5 жыл бұрын

Deutsch* Maus Panzer

@danieldowd4943

5 жыл бұрын

@@silvanag1103 thanks

A normal day a platoon of adams ambushed by a platoon of ivans a m1a2 abrams cost 8 million $ a t-72 manufactured in the era of the 70s and upgraded to t-72b3 a cost of 1.5 million $

@TruthNerds

4 жыл бұрын

I was looking for this comment. ^^ The M1A2 costs a fortune…

Why are the gunners of the T-72B3 tanks facing the opposite direction?

Do challenger 2 vs leopard 2 next!!

I would say the Abrams but with 9 damaged its hard to say since idk its just the engines or tracks or guns because if those 4 T-72s wanted to advance only 1 could fight properly

1:02 Can anyone explain why the gunner back is facing the abram?

T72 should fire their ATGM first..not a AP

Thx for next video ^^

Leopard 2A6 vs M1A3 Abrams next

One of Russian tankists said that he see LIHGT TANK LMFAO, now M1A2 is a light tank. And were is anti tank missiles? Well yes something like this will happen in reality now we wait T-80

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

First two rounds T-72s shot out were AT missiles "Refleks"

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

Unlike APFSDS, you can actually see AT missile much slower movement at 01:06

@kgb4973

5 жыл бұрын

@@warfare11gaming thanks

Day by day your battle simulation are getting better, awesome sounds!

Which version of the M1A2 is been used? Just the simple M1A2's or SEP V's?

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

sepv2

Robz its ww2 mod would you share your edition with modern vehicles? Im interestested in us crew sounds. Can you make a link please?

Do the battle in the Golan Heights

This is good thank you

У т72б3 есть диномическая защита эта что такое?

@user-ke7qt1vw2m

4 жыл бұрын

Да ты прав

@erasylzeidrahimov

3 жыл бұрын

Как понел автор перемешал т-72 на 1:40 там стоит т72б3

It is a win for t72 cuz it wasnt made to fight the m1

Can u tell me the reshade or mod you are using for the lighting and bloom.

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

None. All is just messing around with in-game weather and later some visual effects added

@subhammulky

5 жыл бұрын

@@warfare11gaming do u have a discord link

Where do you find such beautiful maps? Can you please tell me where you got this map?

@warfare11gaming

4 жыл бұрын

I made it myself

Can you please make a another fortress video?

Panther II vs T-55AM

0:34 decal says bitch lasagna on the cannon barrel

@averagewikipediaenthusiast3088

3 жыл бұрын

+100% Shell velocity -10% Camo - Banned in India

Look at that depleted uranium move

No way would I be hanging out the turret hatch.

That one bounced!!

Just 30 M1 Abrams Vs 48 T-72

Is that 10 Abrams left of which 9 are damaged? Or 10 plus 9 that are damaged/abandoned?

@vanja2565

4 жыл бұрын

9 out of 10 are damaged, damaged can mean turret or engine knocked out etc...so it's clearly a victory for t72

@TruthNerds

4 жыл бұрын

Only 1 is undamaged. The extent of damage on the other 9 surviving tank is not specified. Also note that, in reality, different types of "kill" are distinguished: mobility kill, firepower kill, mission kill or - the worst case - the catastrophic kill (aka "K-kill"). In this simulation, it seems the Russian tanks suffered many K-kills whereas the American tanks were more likely to suffer e.g. a mission kill, with some surviving crew.

Amazing battle

So funny to see how such heavy machines move on the soil like on the asphalt ) in real life half of them would stuck in ground or lose their speed and would not maneuvere well

@charlesuplifted5216

Жыл бұрын

That’s not exactly true unless it’s mud swamp These machines are tracked and have a lot of power and traction control

WWIII starts Crickets: "Anyways I've started chirping."

That map looks how A2 chernarus map

@warfare11gaming

5 жыл бұрын

There's definitely something common then - Eastern Europe

which begs the question, why does all the t-72 roof gunner facing backwards?

In the real world, neither side would base their strategy on a sole asset.

10 Panthers vs 25 T-34's

How did he get t80s and m1a2s in men of war assault squad?

@warfare11gaming

4 жыл бұрын

These are from Call to Arms games. Modding made it possible

Заебись, вы бы Абрамс ещё против т34 поставьте , может все честно сделаем? Т-90М против Абрамса? А то себе значит посильнее танки взяли, а нам старье дали.

@UncleQ57

4 жыл бұрын

Про Т-73Б3 докладывают наверх и народу, что он современный. И это основные танки двух армий. Единственный реальный перекос - при наступлении по-взрослому силы д.б. 3 к 1.

"Use the big fucker" That translated to something else in my brain

How do you do these custom battles? Is it through Call to Arms?

@warfare11gaming

4 жыл бұрын

This was done in Men of War Assault Squad 2 editor by using some Call to Arms assets.

@lowqualitynoobz9195

4 жыл бұрын

@@warfare11gaming What do you mean when you say 'editor'

@warfare11gaming

4 жыл бұрын

Game editor, map editor, scenario editor. All same thing named differently.

@lowqualitynoobz9195

4 жыл бұрын

@@warfare11gaming And that is all in MoW AS2?

@warfare11gaming

4 жыл бұрын

Yes

Are the T72s firing the latest depleted uranium rounds , i was told by a tank crew man those type of shells can take out the Abrams or any tank .

Pls (M1 A2 ABRAMS VS T-80)

Do 40 Leopard II Tanks vs 100 T-80's

well i decide to halt M1 advance and call for T90 MS support.

Obviously Abram wins. Their armor are really thick

@B1GMAC_03

2 жыл бұрын

There front haul armor is only 80mm but at a steep angle so I wouldn’t call it thick

0:32 "Bi*ch Lasagna" Written On An Abrams Barrel

Even with Russia's modern ammunition variant, the T-72 can not pierce the frontal armor of the M1 ABRAMS at 1500 meters.

@mannotfromeurope3100

2 жыл бұрын

that wasnt 1500 meters

@jakiwijaya7316

2 жыл бұрын

Obv its turret

Next VT4 vs challenger 2 .please

As always, love the decal on the barrel of the 120mm

в таких условиях у т72б3 даже 200абрашки не конкурент

@letiii6562

5 жыл бұрын

Да брат! Да

Many people say that T-72 is an obsolete tank

What map/mod is this?

Notice for the T72 to survive it had top be entrenched and still lost.

Eventhogh in a tatic disvantage, the Abrams won.

@motherfuckingthing2047

5 жыл бұрын

No The t-72b3 win by the damaged abrams

@Feffdc

5 жыл бұрын

A damaged tank is a useless tank(and dead usually)

@quintenvankasteel2437

5 жыл бұрын

@@Feffdc depends on what got damaged. I'm not sure to what extent a tank can be damaged in this game but let's put it like this: because the yanks were attacking, in order to "win" they'd have to have more tanks remaining that can actually move then the ruski's as well as having more tanks that can fight. To this extent, of the Americans have more tanks that are operational than the Russians, then they "win" and vice versa for the Russians. I keep putting quotation marks because technically it ended in a draw as both sides were left in what was basically a staring contest

@Feffdc

5 жыл бұрын

@@quintenvankasteel2437 Thing is that with the remaining T-72s fully operational the Soviets can easily pick off the immobilised Abrams tanks even one by one if needed

@flyinglycandeathforcommuni6292

5 жыл бұрын

motherfucking thing Negative.

Es una pena que en el editor no se pueda aplicar las cualidades del leopardo 2A6 que es velocidad en ataque con alcance de 5 km y disparó en movimiento muy certero más que en parado aparte su blundaje

Just as always he surprise us with his creation.

M1A1 Abrams VS M1A2 Abrams which is better

Wouldn’t the abrams have engaged from long distance?

Props to the TCs who remained standing in the hatch throughout the battle I guess their balls are too big to get back inside the hatch

Has un video de Rusia vs usa con todo su armamento moderno

"Eyes on the heavy armor, he's a big fucker"

Hmmm i hear an a10 coming in

It is so satisfying to see an M1 get killed in one of warfare gaming videos

"[...]he's a big fucker." -Random M1A2 Abrams

*T72 SUPPORTER* : Блять *Abrams SUPPORTER* : FUCK

Blyat intensifies

whats the camouflage mod for the T72B3?

@warfare11gaming

2 жыл бұрын

It's from game Call to Arms

@2:14, why is the Russian soldier facing the other direction? He needs to face the one "congratulating" him

M1A2 Abrams. The T72Bs were dug in, less survived, they had the battle advantage of being dug in. But lost more. And most likely the 9 damaged M1A2 Abrams are track or gun damage or side skirts, there for the M1A2 Abrams was victorious. But U.S forces will most likely call for artilary or air barrages next time they encounter 'heavy armour'.

@kittyhawk9707

5 жыл бұрын

What ..and the fucking Soviets wont???? oh and on the battlefield a fucked up tank is no good to anybody. dickhead

0:40 наблюдаю за перемещением ЛЕГКОГО танка 😂

him i don't think the t-72 can pen abrams that well even the m1a2

How about M1A2 vs T-90MS

The Defenders got paddled