朗朗的土耳其進行曲好聽太多了。改良版不耐聽，新奇感很快逝去，大量不和諧的改編只是彈者得意陶醉，我聽得燥累。能表達作者抗辯的一兩個不和諧音组是畫龍點睛（Mozart k304 part one )，令人回味贊妙。我更喜歡音色美，技巧純為更好表達情感的演奏。朗朗感情，音色，速度皆完美，設了目標。古典音樂歷久不衰基於音樂家，音樂老師，學生的努力，聽眾的喜愛和捧場。
Wow ! Thank you for sharing these two pianists playing the same piece of music side by side so that we can "compare" with our ears ! I must say that I'm not a musician but I thought that I heard two differences - Lan Lan's fingers on the piano keys are "lighter" almost "velvety" and I thought that Lan lan's playing showed the overall melody "sounding better". Just my non-musical ears 2 cents. Comments ?
I very much like Lang Lang's version of this Mozart's Turkish March.
@mochila19785 ай бұрын
Whenever he plays this, I can't help but think that he is the reincarnation of Mozart.
@richardvolpe7664
Ай бұрын
To mochila: Oh, please! You really think Mozart would've plowed his way through this march in such a vulgar, cheap fashion? From all accounts, he indeed meant to 'please' his audiences, but in a dignified, professional way. Here, on the other hand, we have Lang Lang who's determined, no matter what, to wow, to "slay" his viewers. Go ahead and be titilated by his prankish delivery, but try to keep in mind that this madcap tempo is in opposition to what the composer indicated in the score. One more thing: The constant (and boy, do I mean constant!) smiling is something that so many find [choke] endearing, and others find uniquely revolting. Just because this piano player has established himself as one of the happiest people on earth, must he show it for every minute he's sitting on the piano bench? All right, Lang fans - - I'll wait for the usual hate-mail to come my way, but try to be as gentle as you can, okay?
Absolutely amazing! I loved them both. In the first piece, SHE is playing some music, whereas, in the second one, the MUSIC is playing him.
@SuperFerrariX
Жыл бұрын
your ears hears when the girl is playing and when lang lang plays your whole body and sole are listening. This is the best way I can explain their play. Of course I love them both!!!
Since I don’t speak the language that the comments are written in (English only), I don’t know if they were positive or negative ones, and which of the two pianists people preferred. But as a classical pianist myself for more than 1/2 century, my vote is definitely for Lang Lang’s 🎹 rendition by far, and for multiple reasons! If I thought anyone would understand me, I would explain WHY I feel this is true. *** To edit this original comment less than a week later, I thank all of you who for replied, and let me know that I was helpful with your understanding of this piece - even if only just as a music ‘lover’, and not a 🎹ist yourself. I really do appreciate it! I’m so glad that I could shed some light on its meaning, and styles of each ones playing - even with a language barrier of sorts!
@april9082
Жыл бұрын
I agree with you. There are about half of the coments preferred Lang Lang’s rendition by far. Actually, the question I asked in title is which 🎹 rendition closer to Mozart. I'm only a music lover. That'll be appreciated very much if you would like give me your professional explanation.
@sucui3285
Жыл бұрын
Yeah just tell us as I know many ppl here are multilingual
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@april9082 To answer your question, and the other person (Su ?) who asked me about it, and for the same answer about 8 hours ago (under your comment)… I believe it’s the female 🎹ist who’s performance of the Turkish March is more the way in which it was intended to be played - based strictly on playing the notes. She plays them as they were initially written, and does it well imo. BUT Lang Lang’s rendition gives it more ‘flair’ and expression with his style. IF I had to guess the one that Mozart (that’s if he could hear them both) would have liked best, it would be the latter. This is bc of the way he ‘improvised’, thereby making it the ‘fun’, light piece that it was meant to be (from a technical difficulty standpoint, they were both similar). This was not written as, or intended to be, a ‘true’ classical piece - although it was placed in this musical style and genre. I’m guessing the reason why is that he was known as being strictly a classical musician and composer. When you watch and compare the two styles, she appears to be very serious and concentrating on the notes, speed, etc., but w/o clearly visible emotion. On the other hand, Lang Lang (by way of his facial expressions - at times even laughing a little - and other gestures) exemplifies that it’s a lighthearted and rather ‘amusing’ Turkish‘March - as I truly believe was the intent for it to be by Mozart. *** I’m not sure where I read it, but there was an article on the origin of music styles and their history, including this type (and possibly this piece was mentioned too) and how they began, and why. It explained how various cultures and traditions played a large part in the styles of music that represented each of many countries dating back to when the pieces were originally composed. ⭐️ The reason WHY I personally prefer Lang Lang’s versions of all his other performances in general compared with other 🎹ist’s is not only bc of his superior technical skills. It’s also this, and the manner in which he’s able to combine them with both, thereby making a piece his ‘own’ with his unique interpretations, and taking the liberty to improvise - within reason, yet not removing or deviating so much as to take away from the ‘classical’ style of whatever the piece is. (Even some ‘covers’ of songs he’s performed in concerts have been great - ie. Metallica, Sting - to name a couple!) I hope this helps answer the question you both asked me to explain? If not, please lmk and I’ll try again (lol)! 🫠
@april9082
Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your detail explanation. I knew that I enjoyed Lang Lang's rendition more before. For now, I learned that why I was pleased by his 🎹rendition - that's because of the different culture and composer's original intent reflected in his musical style.@@elainemeyer5062
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@april9082 Thanks April, I’m glad you found my explanation helpful! I wasn’t sure if I was able to put into the correct words what I meant, and the reasons for the difference between the two 🎹ist’s interpretation of the exact same ‘classical’ piece. * I put the word classical in quotes bc it wasn’t intended to be one when it was composed/written by Mozart. It was really a result of his ‘humor’ that was the inspiration and the end result for it! As I had already written (in a way), Lang Lang picks up on this with his interpretation, while the female pianist doesn’t quite understand, or take notice, of the original meaning/style of this particular composition, and thus plays it as a purely ‘classical’ piece bc it was composed by Mozart. * I won’t say that she doesn’t play it well technically, but my own impression is it didn’t sound nearly as interesting as Lang Lang’s. I hope this gives you both even a little bit more helpful info 🤔 !? Always enjoy helping people with music - esp. 🎹!
@tianxingwang8565 Жыл бұрын
我更喜欢Jazz版本，很喜欢那种味道。但是如果不喜欢Jazz比如我妈，就说Jazz不在调上。
@reptileandad Жыл бұрын
To compare these two is a dead end, yuja is creative and lang lang is a master of classical
@roor.berllou2 жыл бұрын
演奏状态真舒服 有伸展 厉害
@chihungchan5086 Жыл бұрын
還是喜歡郎朗版， 1、有技巧 2、有音樂 王羽佳如果不露，我會更喜歡！
@pow0439 Жыл бұрын
彈這曲目可以感覺...朗朗是一個腦子四隻手，王思佳則是二個腦子四隻手。
@meiy7043 Жыл бұрын
同意上面的评论。朗朗名不虚传。
@ZYB900 Жыл бұрын
優秀的演出
@user-zd3gc9wt7m5 ай бұрын
听朗朗的让我觉得自己开心的飞了起来❤❤
@amandac26837 ай бұрын
Yuja is an extraordinary musician and lang lang is an excellent performers. Sorry to say there is big differences between the 2. I have heard yuja playing volodes version of Turkish March in person, it was even more impressive.
I have long admired Yuja Wang's performance of the Arcady Volodos rhapsody on Mozart's Turkish Rondo (pretty much a recomposition of the piece) and disliked Lang Lang's mugging while playing. And when listening again to Wang just now, I assumed she could not be topped. But lo and behold, Lang's playing of the Mozart exactly as he wrote it (except for the liberty of a very slight ritard towards the end) was utterly brilliant, and what I had previously called "mugging" was simply his youthful delight in Mozart's genius and humor. So his is the performance I treasure in this comparison-although I would still travel farther to attend an actual concert by Wang.
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
I’ve previously written a comment on this video, but just saw yours. I was glad to see that someone else is writing them in English too, but mainly bc of your change in thoughts on Lang Lang. He played this ‘March’ as it was intended to be by Mozart - a light, fun, and ‘humerus’ piece. However, I would travel anywhere to see LL (vs Yuja Wang) perform at a live concert as opposed to you! Musicians, just like everything else, is a matter of personal taste - this is just my own. 😉
@brunyate
Жыл бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062 Yes, I read your original comment, which is what inspired mine. If I went to hear LL, I would need to keep my eyes closed; while he may not intend them that way, his gestures and facial expressions look awfully like showboating. YW is absolutely his equal as a virtuoso (?virtuosa?), but I have always felt her to be a totally dedicated musician. Thanks for responding!
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@brunyate 😊 I understand what you meant about some of his facial expressions, and bc of it wanting to keep your eyes closed if you saw LL live. I don’t intend for this to change your mind, BUT personally, I think it’s just his own way of expressing himself, being able to ‘feel’, and to become ‘one’ with the piece he’s playing. (I don’t know if you’re familiar with Lola A., or ever watched a video of her play the 🎹, but I’d have to do exactly the same myself, while the majority of men would feel completely different and ogle her due to her physical presentation. She plays with stiletto shoes 👠 , very tight dresses, and has extremely long legs 🦵! * I used Lola as an example, however I don’t feel that she is talented enough to even listen, let alone see, her play. There are many who have the opposite opinion of her than I do.)
@brunyate
Жыл бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062 I am of course a man (though an elderly one), and can't deny that YW's personal appearance is a factor! But I'm also a professional musician. I was actually amazed to find that LL played the Turkish Rondo absolutely straight (though about half as fast again as I can); from what he does with, say, Liszt, I would have assumed he would ham it up. I have actually been at one of his concerts, years ago when he was hardly well known. I was impressed then, and am impressed again now. But too many intervening videos made me change my opinion in between. But I will listen with closed eyes in the future, and perhaps my good impression can remain. Let's leave it at that, shall we?
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@brunyate Absolutely 👍 ! BTW, I too was a classical pianist - and organist (since I was 5 and I’m now almost 70), and have a tendency to be extremely ‘picky’ about pianists and even other musicians as well. I like to see their hands and fingers up close when I watch them play - either in person or on a video. I guess it’s the same for you being a professional, and maybe we each look at a performance in a different way and like or dislike it for our own reasons. Happy listening!
Even though one can’t compare the 2 versions of the same piece, but hands down to Yuja because her ability to modify the piece to such high degree of difficulties and complexity. Of course she can play the classical version equal to or better than Langlang, all I hear here is a race car driver and I was never a fan of him anyways! He has talent, so are a lot of other distinguished concert pianist!
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
It’s amusing in a sense that I have the opposite opinion about the two of them. I prefer Lang Lang’s version to Yuja’s by far! Not only with this one, but in general when I hear them both playing the same classical 🎹 pieces. I can feel much more ‘emotion’ in his, and that I don’t in her. To me, she sounds rather ‘dull’, and although she’s talented technically, she doesn’t come across as being able to make this sound like the ‘fun’ piece that Mozart wrote, and intended it to be. But you’re right about not ‘comparing’ (to a degree) musicians, as each person has their own opinion and preferences. But this is mine!
@nathan8348
7 ай бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062I agree with you, although I am a fan of Yujia, however for this piece I prefer Langlang more than Yujia as I could felt more joy in it.
@lzhou98
6 ай бұрын
I am a big fan of Yuja. I think the two pieces are not comparable as Yuja is not playing the original version. I play piano and I like Yuja’s version better.
Hell what a great piano play battle....unfortunateley I can't understand all the comments here under this video BUT Yuja Wang you did an awesome job and show I like your slower play 🙂
Пікірлер: 678
听王羽佳，感觉她自己很快乐。听朗朗，我很快乐！
@PS-kd1if
Жыл бұрын
说得很有道理。实际上就是这样的。
@user-pr3uj6jh2h
Жыл бұрын
真的
@user-sj9mj5vr8c
Жыл бұрын
聽你評論我很不高興
@jengeo2332
Жыл бұрын
@@user-sj9mj5vr8c 那这样不好，您好好地开心地听曲就行。
@brunobucciarati2702
Жыл бұрын
@cvgnn gjij 你的文字是什麼鬼？
朗朗聽起來耳朵比較舒服，當然自己有自己的版本和演譯都是可以的，但純粹就耳朵和音樂聽起來的感受，更喜歡朗朗，乾淨、清楚、俐落
@hijessica4857
Жыл бұрын
朗朗层次感十足，抑扬顿挫 情感丰富。音乐应该是这样。美妙绝伦
朗朗的土耳其進行曲好聽太多了。改良版不耐聽，新奇感很快逝去，大量不和諧的改編只是彈者得意陶醉，我聽得燥累。能表達作者抗辯的一兩個不和諧音组是畫龍點睛（Mozart k304 part one )，令人回味贊妙。我更喜歡音色美，技巧純為更好表達情感的演奏。朗朗感情，音色，速度皆完美，設了目標。古典音樂歷久不衰基於音樂家，音樂老師，學生的努力，聽眾的喜愛和捧場。
@liufeng2095
3 ай бұрын
朗朗就是太丑了，但凡换长脸
兩人的風格本質上不同, 個人覺得無需比較, 都是讓人感恩有幸能聽其優美音樂表現的存在!
很明显朗朗版更莫扎特,顺耳，哪儿哪儿听着都完美，以前觉得他表情太夸张，今天觉得恰到好处，音乐配上表情，棒！帅！
王羽佳一個人彈出來三台琴的效果，太厲害了❤
王羽佳對於曲子的藝術層次有自己的見解，非常優秀。
@imtring
Жыл бұрын
試圖賦予更多色彩的作法是很困難的，但表現的很穩定，兩個都非常優秀。
@aa-vl4pg
3 ай бұрын
所以王羽佳是钢琴家。而LL只是个弹琴师
@user-rf1ow8km9k
3 ай бұрын
@@aa-vl4pg你说反了吧？
@JulieYuWei-pr6qf
Ай бұрын
可惜改编的不好听
俩人演技都很高 但似乎朗朗的更莫扎特 听上去更舒服。
兩人鋼琴水平都很高,但作為聽眾 我聽朗朗版本感覺比較快樂。王羽佳聽起來只會讓我感覺她很厲害而已
王的弹奏让人感到的确听到了很出色的钢琴演奏，而朗朗一开弹竟似心中一动，联想到清凉晶莹的山泉水珠滴落又弹跳飞溅，音色饱满透亮利落流畅，节奏力度掌控轻松稳健富有弹性。以前觉得他的形体动作和表情过于夸张，现在要说：大师好棒！
@donzhu1561
7 ай бұрын
现在表情形体都收敛了不少
郎朗的土耳其進行曲讓人感覺就像是一隻快樂的小鳥在天際翱翔飛舞著，無論是彈奏者亦或是聽者身心靈暢快淋漓。 ❤
我更喜欢郎朗，他的节奏比王快，但清晰利落，更能反应作品的本意。
2位都是很優秀的鋼琴家❤️❤️
王羽佳我聽到很有壓逼感，朗朗我聽到很開心舒服
兩位都很棒，但是朗朗的可能旋律比較貼近我們常聽到的版本，所以比較順耳，但是多聽幾遍後，覺得王思羽表現出群蜂飛舞的感覺更多元，有歡快嬉戲的、有忙碌工作的、好像也有防衛禦敵的。二位都太優秀了，不愧是國際水平。
@CYTL1960
7 ай бұрын
郎朗，不是朗朗
@lianlong6677
6 ай бұрын
王羽佳！有层次有感情有情绪有内容。不是钢琴机器人。
@jackhuang1807
5 ай бұрын
郎朗的一直讓我很不順耳.. 樂句處理匠氣偏重，也飛不太起來
@JulieYuWei-pr6qf
Ай бұрын
军队以整齐而闻名 而王弹的是一群马蜂 要不改名算了 不是改编就好。
門外漢 黃羽佳聽到我要快轉， 她的演繹太沉重， 一個字悶 朗朗聽到我要去返佢嗰段再聽多幾次， 佢控制琴鍵嘅大細聲並配合整首歌的起伏波浪， 實在太好喇， 令聽眾遊走於不同的快樂層次❤
@Christyfu0126
7 ай бұрын
說的很對！好沈重的進行曲
@bruh-th5ft
7 ай бұрын
自己improvise就悶，跟譜彈就唔悶？我唔係話邊個彈得差邊個彈得好，你講嗰啲嘢求其一個上得台表演嘅鋼琴家都做到，根本講完冇講過，王羽佳improvise 之餘冇離到題，我唔知邊到悶親你。
我相信弹过土耳其这首曲子的业余弹手就知道朗朗弹成这样有多厉害了，每个音的辨识度都那么高，旋律变化特别有新意和连续性，朗朗甚至看起来还那么轻松还有更好更快的空间
@jeremiejia3793
Жыл бұрын
朗朗看起来太做作！
@ohk3963
Жыл бұрын
@@jeremiejia3793 音樂是用來看的嗎 傻逼😹
@jeremiejia3793
Жыл бұрын
@@ohk3963 2B
@jeremiejia3793
Жыл бұрын
@@ohk3963 CNMB CNQJ
@billfu528
Жыл бұрын
朗朗的钢琴曲只能闭着眼睛听。听唱片没问题，但如果去听音乐会，看视频，总不可能一直闭着眼睛吧。 被音乐感动到随着音乐舞动，这是应该的，但从头到尾，无论当下音乐的表情如何，始终手舞足蹈，这就过了。
朗朗非常善于抑扬顿挫轻重缓急，神乎其技
兩位都很喜歡，各自放點自己的風格裡面，太厲害了。
各有千秋朗朗的快樂是在形式上的羽佳的快樂是真實的
郎朗那个简直是神了.
Wow ! Thank you for sharing these two pianists playing the same piece of music side by side so that we can "compare" with our ears ! I must say that I'm not a musician but I thought that I heard two differences - Lan Lan's fingers on the piano keys are "lighter" almost "velvety" and I thought that Lan lan's playing showed the overall melody "sounding better". Just my non-musical ears 2 cents. Comments ?
郎郎是莫扎特原版，簡單的程度。王羽佳的改編版加入許多複雜高難度琴藝技術的表現，表現她傑出、驚人的鋼琴演奏水平
@CYTL1960
7 ай бұрын
郎朗
@stej0723
7 ай бұрын
王羽佳改的讓人聽了非常不適
@meggiel.512
7 ай бұрын
@@stej0723 曲風不同，有些特異，但技術性超高水準
@ericyeh8684
6 ай бұрын
內行人😊
@lianlong6677
6 ай бұрын
赞同。👍王羽佳她心里有音乐啊
我觉得弹得好听比弹得利害更值得买票听
@PaulineYao-dx1co
5 ай бұрын
弹得厲害好像在打架(在作拳脚功夫)
@smwong6817
3 ай бұрын
悦耳最重要。
@JulieYuWei-pr6qf
Ай бұрын
群蜂乱舞
个人比较喜欢王羽佳的版本， 非常有创新，特别，有趣，加了少许爵士的激情， 赞
我喜歡朗朗
王羽佳的版本彷彿兩個人四手聯彈。只有她才能達到
一個是彈原版的，一個是彈改編炫技版的，沒什麼好吵的，如果王彈原版的話，那跟朗相比可能就有看頭了，不過王改編炫技版的真的是有夠誇張的，一堆琶音，加上尾段左手原曲右手無限音節琶音，看她手臂肌肉就知道一定是刻苦練出來的神臂。整體以兩者演奏技巧，各有千秋，兩位大師級人物就是天生生下來要來彈鋼琴的。
@PaulineYao-dx1co
5 ай бұрын
一個在弹，一個在耍，
@yanaya713
4 ай бұрын
朗朗的速度比原版快太多了。
@KeyboardxDrawmer
4 ай бұрын
@@yanaya713雖然朗朗速度比較快，但王的是變奏版，難度更高，所以才會彈慢，後面那個變奏的時候也很快呀😅😅。 一個是演繹原版的味道，一個是演繹變奏版的味道，所以兩個無法比較，各有各的風格。
@yu-og3lp
4 ай бұрын
@@yanaya713 以難度王的真的比較高
@smwong6817
3 ай бұрын
朗朗的好聽多了。
郎朗彈得👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
一樣是鐘或是土耳其進行曲，每個音樂家演奏出來的風格都不一樣， 音樂是藝術，藝術並不是指技巧上的強弱，而是讓人發自內心由衷的讚嘆並且是流連忘返的一再回味、探討其中（共情）。 王的演奏技巧沒話說，改編的土耳其進行曲也有無限的想像空間，但我在她的想像空間沒有太多共情的部份，可能會覺得..原來可以這樣的表現，然後..嗯嗯沒了 朗朗的演奏會讓人覺得他想傳遞的風格，非常霸道卻又覺得直率有趣，我是門外漢但我卻能聽得出現場演奏難能可貴的一點小瑕疵（我個人認為），他連這樣的小瑕疵都不屑去修飾（3：42），這樣的不完美在個人看來才是完美！ 最後一個音符，我不禁發笑（有人跟我一樣？）
朗朗指力控制真好 每個音符都清晰 尤其是彈跳音之有力卻輕快
I am very happy when i am listening lang lang 's turki march. Lang lang, beautiful performance. Vivian
这个王羽佳我是喜欢不起来 感觉就是快！没什么感情。个人喜好朗朗
@DansySingsBig_Youtube_channel
9 күн бұрын
同意🙆
💙🤍❤ Bonjour de la France! merci pour cette magnifique marche turque 💙🤍❤
听了三遍喜欢王羽佳的版本，她有个有趣的灵魂
郎朗的指艺清晰度更强，有快乐幸福感！
@Franz_Liszt_Korean
2 жыл бұрын
Agree
@Koenigin369
2 жыл бұрын
同意！更加轻快舒适！
@ccc1703
2 жыл бұрын
两首完全不同难度的曲子...演绎方式和难度都完全不同......不知道能比个什么.....
@sound4823
Жыл бұрын
@@ccc1703 聽了舒適感不同
這一次我頭朗朗一票
朗朗彈奏聽出輕鬆和愉悅的心情 更高層次 不只是炫技
艺术是主观的。郎朗版当然是耳熟能详，本身也不是难曲，中规中矩无意外无惊喜。羽佳版令人惊艳！遍尝全球各地美食就会懂得欣赏每一种不同的味道，多元化欣赏音乐🎵更能享受到不同风格的精妙。羽佳版非常厉害，我很喜欢！不仅仅是炫技之说，其音乐性给我打大惊喜，非常享受，层次丰富又粒粒分明，酣畅淋漓，意犹未尽，再说一次我好喜欢❤！妙人妙曲❤，感谢🙏
我对两个人的演奏都很欣赏， 都是了不起的钢琴大师，没必要褒一个贬一个。
I very much like Lang Lang's version of this Mozart's Turkish March.
Whenever he plays this, I can't help but think that he is the reincarnation of Mozart.
@richardvolpe7664
Ай бұрын
To mochila: Oh, please! You really think Mozart would've plowed his way through this march in such a vulgar, cheap fashion? From all accounts, he indeed meant to 'please' his audiences, but in a dignified, professional way. Here, on the other hand, we have Lang Lang who's determined, no matter what, to wow, to "slay" his viewers. Go ahead and be titilated by his prankish delivery, but try to keep in mind that this madcap tempo is in opposition to what the composer indicated in the score. One more thing: The constant (and boy, do I mean constant!) smiling is something that so many find [choke] endearing, and others find uniquely revolting. Just because this piano player has established himself as one of the happiest people on earth, must he show it for every minute he's sitting on the piano bench? All right, Lang fans - - I'll wait for the usual hate-mail to come my way, but try to be as gentle as you can, okay?
朗朗展現的是古典音樂輝煌的歷史與傳統，王羽佳則是在創造古典音樂未來的新樣貌。都很棒～但是更佩服王羽佳的創造力
朗朗表演成分有點多，但卻是每個音都很清晰，大師水準.
@pinewang506
Жыл бұрын
真知灼见
彈過著曲子就知道王羽佳是在演繹，而且還不錯，有些炫技，朗朗則是中規中矩
@asitecn
Жыл бұрын
炫技改编一下就可以随便弹错，听着不舒服。
@Y3llow_Submarin3
8 ай бұрын
羽佳談的90%炫技@@asitecn
我喜歡朗朗彈的，自然流暢，有感情，聽得很舒服，他是很優秀的，至於王羽佳，聽得很辛苦
@boono.yyq.g
Жыл бұрын
朗朗輕快但又柔軟，王羽佳硬邦邦的沒感情感覺是硬彈的
@briannasu3001
Жыл бұрын
她弹琴的手指头用力都不对啊😢完全没有力气。情感也没有从指尖传达到钢琴上
@user-tu7my9ro6j
Жыл бұрын
@@briannasu3001 她只在表演速度
@user-te8qy2bp9j
Жыл бұрын
郎朗名不虚传。如果用演讲来比喻，这篇演讲，抑扬顿挫，扣人心弦，给人留下极深的印象。相比之下，羽佳的演奏平淡了一些。
@kkbox5097
Жыл бұрын
@Guan 你有聽過現場嘛?
Thanks you for sharing ♥️💓💓🤩👍😍😍🙏
有比較！朗朗輕鬆自然悦耳，技巧高些
Lang Lang's performance reminded me of the movie 'Amadeus'. This is exactly how Mozart would have played his own piece, if he had the skills 😃😀😃😀
@kgan4733
5 ай бұрын
Beautiful ❤️
兩位鋼琴家都技藝高超，但郎郎的音樂確實帶給了我輕鬆、歡樂的心情。【我把歡樂注入音樂，為的是讓全世界感到歡樂 - 莫札特】
音樂性 朗朗非常愉悅 一致性 協調一流. 炫技性 王羽佳吝人耳目一新, 熱鬧繽紛. 朗朗 快得很平穩(真的很快), 王羽佳 敢衝 繽紛 神技. 都非常難彈, 都是神人. 我個人比較喜歡協調一致, 所以 喜歡 朗朗 全段, 與王羽佳 前段(後段有一點太 over 了).
一個是在玩，一個是規規矩矩彈，這要怎麼比呢？兩位都是大師級，也都很愛獻技，不過兩位在彈奏拉赫曼尼諾夫2號鋼琴協奏曲時，我認為是不相上下的，這曲子我很熟，不過王羽佳勝在拿到葛萊美獎，有史以來最偉大鋼琴家50 人她在列而郎朗沒有。
作为业余的旁观者，我投票给朗朗。两个理由：一是朗朗的演奏中旋律更加清楚，二是他更加放松和游刃有余。
@jinggu9787
Жыл бұрын
+1
@LemonloctzYT
Жыл бұрын
其實兩者不可比較
@LemonloctzYT
Жыл бұрын
不同版本
@jackc3119
Жыл бұрын
@@LemonloctzYT 我不是专业的，可以说下吗？听起来是一个曲子啊，长度也几乎一样
@kenchen245
Жыл бұрын
@@jackc3119 yuja所演奏的版本難度近乎不可思議，是改編自volodos改編的turkish march
我更喜欢朗朗的演奏，听起来身心愉悦。王羽佳也很棒。
@konosuke123
Жыл бұрын
Improvise play as you like and have fun!
兩位大師都是天花板啊，聽的很享受
王羽佳演奏的是她自己编改的作品，全称为莫扎特，爵士，沃罗多斯，王羽佳土耳其进行曲，简称王羽佳土耳其进行曲。其中沃罗多斯部分难度极高，其本人也达不到王羽佳的速度与流畅度。
@Y3llow_Submarin3
8 ай бұрын
拜託 不是她 改編的好嗎 Transcript written by Arcadi Volodos
@xukinei4323
8 ай бұрын
@@Y3llow_Submarin3 这使她17岁时弹奏的沃罗多斯的土耳其进行曲kzread.info/dash/bejne/e3uasruin7DNY7g.html 这使她24岁时曲头变成莫扎特的kzread.info/dash/bejne/qIt6xcSuf8TcY8o.html 这是完全版kzread.info/dash/bejne/onyBl5RmgbWTlZM.html 相对于完全版，视频已有所删减·。请仔细听。
@Y3llow_Submarin3
8 ай бұрын
@@xukinei4323 one by Volodos one by Fasil Say
兩人詮釋不同~各有優點！
更喜欢朗朗的演奏， 感觉很轻松
Absolutely amazing! I loved them both. In the first piece, SHE is playing some music, whereas, in the second one, the MUSIC is playing him.
@SuperFerrariX
Жыл бұрын
your ears hears when the girl is playing and when lang lang plays your whole body and sole are listening. This is the best way I can explain their play. Of course I love them both!!!
痴線的演譯，太正！thx!
王羽佳也是大師級彈奏，但朗朗更有輕快和旋律的輕重變化、恰到好處，感覺更有感情，我投郎朗一票。
3:17-3:20 definitely a gem in music history
The judges' expressions said everything.
虽然没法对比，更喜欢朗朗的演奏
我是外行，这是一场强强对决的表演，王羽佳弹出了激情，很熟练，如果是她单独演奏可能要好一些，可与郎朗比着表演，就觉出王羽佳好像有点赶和乱了；郎朗弹出了美，每个音符像玻璃珠落地般的清晰滑润。若让我必须二选一的话，我选郎朗。
@asitecn
Жыл бұрын
王羽佳在乱弹。
Since I don’t speak the language that the comments are written in (English only), I don’t know if they were positive or negative ones, and which of the two pianists people preferred. But as a classical pianist myself for more than 1/2 century, my vote is definitely for Lang Lang’s 🎹 rendition by far, and for multiple reasons! If I thought anyone would understand me, I would explain WHY I feel this is true. *** To edit this original comment less than a week later, I thank all of you who for replied, and let me know that I was helpful with your understanding of this piece - even if only just as a music ‘lover’, and not a 🎹ist yourself. I really do appreciate it! I’m so glad that I could shed some light on its meaning, and styles of each ones playing - even with a language barrier of sorts!
@april9082
Жыл бұрын
I agree with you. There are about half of the coments preferred Lang Lang’s rendition by far. Actually, the question I asked in title is which 🎹 rendition closer to Mozart. I'm only a music lover. That'll be appreciated very much if you would like give me your professional explanation.
@sucui3285
Жыл бұрын
Yeah just tell us as I know many ppl here are multilingual
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@april9082 To answer your question, and the other person (Su ?) who asked me about it, and for the same answer about 8 hours ago (under your comment)… I believe it’s the female 🎹ist who’s performance of the Turkish March is more the way in which it was intended to be played - based strictly on playing the notes. She plays them as they were initially written, and does it well imo. BUT Lang Lang’s rendition gives it more ‘flair’ and expression with his style. IF I had to guess the one that Mozart (that’s if he could hear them both) would have liked best, it would be the latter. This is bc of the way he ‘improvised’, thereby making it the ‘fun’, light piece that it was meant to be (from a technical difficulty standpoint, they were both similar). This was not written as, or intended to be, a ‘true’ classical piece - although it was placed in this musical style and genre. I’m guessing the reason why is that he was known as being strictly a classical musician and composer. When you watch and compare the two styles, she appears to be very serious and concentrating on the notes, speed, etc., but w/o clearly visible emotion. On the other hand, Lang Lang (by way of his facial expressions - at times even laughing a little - and other gestures) exemplifies that it’s a lighthearted and rather ‘amusing’ Turkish‘March - as I truly believe was the intent for it to be by Mozart. *** I’m not sure where I read it, but there was an article on the origin of music styles and their history, including this type (and possibly this piece was mentioned too) and how they began, and why. It explained how various cultures and traditions played a large part in the styles of music that represented each of many countries dating back to when the pieces were originally composed. ⭐️ The reason WHY I personally prefer Lang Lang’s versions of all his other performances in general compared with other 🎹ist’s is not only bc of his superior technical skills. It’s also this, and the manner in which he’s able to combine them with both, thereby making a piece his ‘own’ with his unique interpretations, and taking the liberty to improvise - within reason, yet not removing or deviating so much as to take away from the ‘classical’ style of whatever the piece is. (Even some ‘covers’ of songs he’s performed in concerts have been great - ie. Metallica, Sting - to name a couple!) I hope this helps answer the question you both asked me to explain? If not, please lmk and I’ll try again (lol)! 🫠
@april9082
Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your detail explanation. I knew that I enjoyed Lang Lang's rendition more before. For now, I learned that why I was pleased by his 🎹rendition - that's because of the different culture and composer's original intent reflected in his musical style.@@elainemeyer5062
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@april9082 Thanks April, I’m glad you found my explanation helpful! I wasn’t sure if I was able to put into the correct words what I meant, and the reasons for the difference between the two 🎹ist’s interpretation of the exact same ‘classical’ piece. * I put the word classical in quotes bc it wasn’t intended to be one when it was composed/written by Mozart. It was really a result of his ‘humor’ that was the inspiration and the end result for it! As I had already written (in a way), Lang Lang picks up on this with his interpretation, while the female pianist doesn’t quite understand, or take notice, of the original meaning/style of this particular composition, and thus plays it as a purely ‘classical’ piece bc it was composed by Mozart. * I won’t say that she doesn’t play it well technically, but my own impression is it didn’t sound nearly as interesting as Lang Lang’s. I hope this gives you both even a little bit more helpful info 🤔 !? Always enjoy helping people with music - esp. 🎹!
我更喜欢Jazz版本，很喜欢那种味道。但是如果不喜欢Jazz比如我妈，就说Jazz不在调上。
To compare these two is a dead end, yuja is creative and lang lang is a master of classical
演奏状态真舒服 有伸展 厉害
還是喜歡郎朗版， 1、有技巧 2、有音樂 王羽佳如果不露，我會更喜歡！
彈這曲目可以感覺...朗朗是一個腦子四隻手，王思佳則是二個腦子四隻手。
同意上面的评论。朗朗名不虚传。
優秀的演出
听朗朗的让我觉得自己开心的飞了起来❤❤
Yuja is an extraordinary musician and lang lang is an excellent performers. Sorry to say there is big differences between the 2. I have heard yuja playing volodes version of Turkish March in person, it was even more impressive.
钢琴弹到一定高度 改编是一种享受😎
王羽佳獨一無二 朗朗，後面的隊排的很長
羽佳的演奏一贯是情绪宣泄凤凰飞空，爱把自己的感情融入作品并与之共舞。朗朗是循规蹈矩一板一眼顺从原著照本宣读，容易使士绅贵妇喜欢。一个是少年即在开放多变的西方生活和专业学习，一个是传统保守的中国苦练成长。而现代对艺术发展进步的论述之一是“环境”，包括地理气候人文社会等等，这也侧面体现了他们形成不同风格的原因之一。就我个人而言，比较喜欢王羽佳的演奏，它体现了“与时俱进”的当代。🎉
@randyekrer431
5 ай бұрын
尬吹 很尬
@lishengwu4230
5 ай бұрын
@@randyekrer431 ???不懂
@randyekrer431
5 ай бұрын
@@lishengwu4230我可能冤枉你了. 但是“朗朗是循规蹈矩一板一眼顺从原著照本宣读” 这句我是绝对没法认同的. 钢琴演奏我只能说略懂, 但是我认为这句话, “循规蹈矩一板一眼顺从原著照本宣读” 对任何专业钢琴家都是带有侮辱色彩的. 所有谱子能记录的信息都是非常有限的, 而钢琴家们花费几十年时间学习 然后通过自己的专业知识和见识去理解 去演绎弹奏那写记录下来的音符, 用自己的乐理知识去改进, 弹出自己的味道, 怎么都和循规蹈矩扯不上关系. 仅仅靠乐谱, 一个钢琴家最多能弹50分. 剩下的我姑且称他为‘艺术’. 不论朗朗还是其他世界级钢琴家, 各个都有自己对于弹奏独特的见解. 没有一个人能够通过’循规蹈矩‘达到世界级钢琴水平.
I have long admired Yuja Wang's performance of the Arcady Volodos rhapsody on Mozart's Turkish Rondo (pretty much a recomposition of the piece) and disliked Lang Lang's mugging while playing. And when listening again to Wang just now, I assumed she could not be topped. But lo and behold, Lang's playing of the Mozart exactly as he wrote it (except for the liberty of a very slight ritard towards the end) was utterly brilliant, and what I had previously called "mugging" was simply his youthful delight in Mozart's genius and humor. So his is the performance I treasure in this comparison-although I would still travel farther to attend an actual concert by Wang.
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
I’ve previously written a comment on this video, but just saw yours. I was glad to see that someone else is writing them in English too, but mainly bc of your change in thoughts on Lang Lang. He played this ‘March’ as it was intended to be by Mozart - a light, fun, and ‘humerus’ piece. However, I would travel anywhere to see LL (vs Yuja Wang) perform at a live concert as opposed to you! Musicians, just like everything else, is a matter of personal taste - this is just my own. 😉
@brunyate
Жыл бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062 Yes, I read your original comment, which is what inspired mine. If I went to hear LL, I would need to keep my eyes closed; while he may not intend them that way, his gestures and facial expressions look awfully like showboating. YW is absolutely his equal as a virtuoso (?virtuosa?), but I have always felt her to be a totally dedicated musician. Thanks for responding!
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@brunyate 😊 I understand what you meant about some of his facial expressions, and bc of it wanting to keep your eyes closed if you saw LL live. I don’t intend for this to change your mind, BUT personally, I think it’s just his own way of expressing himself, being able to ‘feel’, and to become ‘one’ with the piece he’s playing. (I don’t know if you’re familiar with Lola A., or ever watched a video of her play the 🎹, but I’d have to do exactly the same myself, while the majority of men would feel completely different and ogle her due to her physical presentation. She plays with stiletto shoes 👠 , very tight dresses, and has extremely long legs 🦵! * I used Lola as an example, however I don’t feel that she is talented enough to even listen, let alone see, her play. There are many who have the opposite opinion of her than I do.)
@brunyate
Жыл бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062 I am of course a man (though an elderly one), and can't deny that YW's personal appearance is a factor! But I'm also a professional musician. I was actually amazed to find that LL played the Turkish Rondo absolutely straight (though about half as fast again as I can); from what he does with, say, Liszt, I would have assumed he would ham it up. I have actually been at one of his concerts, years ago when he was hardly well known. I was impressed then, and am impressed again now. But too many intervening videos made me change my opinion in between. But I will listen with closed eyes in the future, and perhaps my good impression can remain. Let's leave it at that, shall we?
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
@@brunyate Absolutely 👍 ! BTW, I too was a classical pianist - and organist (since I was 5 and I’m now almost 70), and have a tendency to be extremely ‘picky’ about pianists and even other musicians as well. I like to see their hands and fingers up close when I watch them play - either in person or on a video. I guess it’s the same for you being a professional, and maybe we each look at a performance in a different way and like or dislike it for our own reasons. Happy listening!
本想两者不会差太多。但听了王的让我心脏很不舒服！听完朗朗的演奏让我感觉非常非常心旷神怡！很兴奋！我自己都奇怪有这样不同的感受！
@fl6547
5 ай бұрын
那你千万别听爵士乐，可能会进icu
朗朗彈的真好！放心的聽，另一個很免強緊張的聽完。
朗朗版的悅耳舒適,羽佳版：勁而澎湃,但不能不斷重播！
兩位都厲害
Both are so damn amazing good !
Even though one can’t compare the 2 versions of the same piece, but hands down to Yuja because her ability to modify the piece to such high degree of difficulties and complexity. Of course she can play the classical version equal to or better than Langlang, all I hear here is a race car driver and I was never a fan of him anyways! He has talent, so are a lot of other distinguished concert pianist!
@elainemeyer5062
Жыл бұрын
It’s amusing in a sense that I have the opposite opinion about the two of them. I prefer Lang Lang’s version to Yuja’s by far! Not only with this one, but in general when I hear them both playing the same classical 🎹 pieces. I can feel much more ‘emotion’ in his, and that I don’t in her. To me, she sounds rather ‘dull’, and although she’s talented technically, she doesn’t come across as being able to make this sound like the ‘fun’ piece that Mozart wrote, and intended it to be. But you’re right about not ‘comparing’ (to a degree) musicians, as each person has their own opinion and preferences. But this is mine!
@nathan8348
7 ай бұрын
@@elainemeyer5062I agree with you, although I am a fan of Yujia, however for this piece I prefer Langlang more than Yujia as I could felt more joy in it.
@lzhou98
6 ай бұрын
I am a big fan of Yuja. I think the two pieces are not comparable as Yuja is not playing the original version. I play piano and I like Yuja’s version better.
超好聽
很多人讨厌朗朗是因为他浮夸的表情！其实大可不必。。抛开这些认真听的话我觉得朗朗是最牛的！
王羽佳的有创意，古怪精灵，在五光十色炫技中让人目不暇接。朗朗弹得中规中矩，但是绝对是高手！只是比起王羽佳就是少了些创意。
Hell what a great piano play battle....unfortunateley I can't understand all the comments here under this video BUT Yuja Wang you did an awesome job and show I like your slower play 🙂
朗是纯古典，王是后現代
聽到眼淚不自覺流出來~ 神!
兩位都是神人等級。但是我比較喜歡郎朗彈奏的版本，因為是我小時候學過的版本。雖然我再練個100年，也沒辦法達到這境界。😅
@meggiel.512
Жыл бұрын
是啊！王羽佳是超級艱深的版本，郎郎是小學的版本。郎郎要練10年王羽佳的版本就可以達到她的境界
王羽佳手指其快又！❤
❤不同凡響的女鋼琴家！❤❤
2 masters! Just different pianos.
兩位都是我超喜歡的⋯⋯朗朗清脆乾淨沒話可說🏅我還是選yuja、百聴不厭😍
兩個都很神，個人喜歡朗朗。
听了2位大师的演奏， 我觉得朗朗的听了比较舒服， 比较“顺”
喜欢郎朗的，他比较原著，听曲的人都是熟悉那曲才能投入去听，就比如说在听那首歌投入时会跟着它唱，改编过就唱唱就对不上了
朗朗1臉高潮樣,神!