No video

माया क्या है; अद्वैत् वेदान्त अनुसार; What is Maya; Illusion- as per Advait Vedanta-by Yogesh Bagdi

==============================================================
Social Media Links:
KZread subscription link: www.youtube.co...
Tweeter: / vedantaguruji
Facebook: / vedanta.guruji.5
Telegram channel: t.me/VedantaGu...
Telegram Group: t.me/VedantaGuru
===========================================================
#Maya , #Mithya , #illusion, #advait, #vedanta
explained by Shri Yogesh Bagdi
माया क्या है?
अद्वैत् वेदान्त मे माया की क्या भूमिका है?
क्या अद्वैत वेदान्त मायावादी है?
माया और ब्रह्म का क्या सम्बन्ध है?
क्या ये दोनों अलग अलग सत्ता है, साङ्ख्य के प्रकृति और पुरुष की तरह?
माया कब से है? ब्रह्मन के पहले या बाद से?
माया और मोक्ष का क्या संबन्ध है?
जब अद्वैत् वेदान्त कहता है, ब्रह्म सत्यम जगत मिथ्या, तो क्या ये जगत वास्तव मे झूठ है? क्या इसका कोइ अस्तित्व नही?
माया को कैसे पार करे?
What is maya?
What is Maya's role in Advaita Vedanta?
Is Advaita Vedanta Mayawadi?
What is the relationship between Maya and Brahma?
Are these two different entities, like Prakriti and Purusha?
Since when is Maya? Before or after Brahman?
What is the relationship between Maya and Moksha?
When Advaita Vedanta says, Brahma Satyam Jagat Mithya, is this world unreal? Does it have any existence?
How to overcome maya?
Credits:
All the images are copyright free.
Image title
472-4720512_graphic-free use-download-film-projector-clipart-old-video free to use from :
www.pikpng.com...

Пікірлер: 178

  • @harsharyan487
    @harsharyan4873 жыл бұрын

    “Brahma satya jagat mithya, jivo brahmaiva naparah”

  • @as8084
    @as80842 жыл бұрын

    इतना बढ़िया वीडियो कि इसकी तारीफ करने के लिए शब्द नहीं है वाह धन्यवाद

  • @as8084
    @as80842 жыл бұрын

    सबका भला करो भगवान सबके कष्ट मिटे भगवान सबको सन्मति दे भगवान सब सुख सच हो सब दुख झूठ धन्यवाद परमात्मा आपका और सब देवी देवता और आत्मा ओंका र का

  • @deveshpandey3405
    @deveshpandey34052 жыл бұрын

    आज माया समझ आ गई सर 🙏🙏😊

  • @sujbagdi1274
    @sujbagdi12744 жыл бұрын

    Maya, very well explained Yogeshji. And your examples are amazing, as usual.🙏🕉️

  • @preetikachhawa4847
    @preetikachhawa48473 жыл бұрын

    Bhaut sunder explain Kiya aap ne.Thank you Guru ji,aap ka bhaut bhaut aabhar🙏🙇

  • @KrishnaSharma-ow5xm
    @KrishnaSharma-ow5xm3 жыл бұрын

    Wow very nice post sir dhanyavad or pranam

  • @krishnajideshpande6211
    @krishnajideshpande6211 Жыл бұрын

    I watched so many vedios on maya ,but I didn't understood. But watching your vedio with simple and easy explanation with examples now I am say that I get to know about maya. Thank you very much sir🙏🙏

  • @KuldipSingha-do9uj

    @KuldipSingha-do9uj

    Жыл бұрын

    What is maya?

  • @waytosuccess6906
    @waytosuccess69063 жыл бұрын

    Thank u sir.. for ur information based on illusion

  • @VikasSingh-qs4gx
    @VikasSingh-qs4gx3 жыл бұрын

    Thankfully sir Jo aap ne itna simple samjhaya aap bhahut ache ho ...sir aap se ek request h astavakra Gita ko bhi aap ek bar simple trike se samjha do plz plz plz sir.....🙏🙏

  • @IrfanAli-db6kb
    @IrfanAli-db6kb3 жыл бұрын

    Beyond par excellence " Brahm " satya hai. Maya mithya hai. End of all knowledge

  • @tusharlohar2520
    @tusharlohar25202 жыл бұрын

    CS student listening this because I was Interested in augmented reality 🙏

  • @matrixmayaearthandwe6478
    @matrixmayaearthandwe6478 Жыл бұрын

    Maya is Matrix. When I saw matrix again I relaised it did explain this complex thing.

  • @ravishankarsawant8227
    @ravishankarsawant82274 жыл бұрын

    The way of explanation is really good to understand topic , thanks sir

  • @VirendraSingh-iu2nc
    @VirendraSingh-iu2nc2 жыл бұрын

    Very nice way to explain. Thanks🌹❤👌.

  • @mr.vikrant3583
    @mr.vikrant3583 Жыл бұрын

    Great sir, i m philosophy upsc, 😎 lovely and no.1 explanation.

  • @latikashenoy1782
    @latikashenoy17824 жыл бұрын

    Wowww soo nicely explained 🙏🙏 Trigunatika Maya 🙏

  • @praneelgandhi8643
    @praneelgandhi8643 Жыл бұрын

    Nice explanation sir😊

  • @swapnoneelduttamajumdar5049
    @swapnoneelduttamajumdar50492 жыл бұрын

    Very well explained

  • @archanajoshi878
    @archanajoshi8786 ай бұрын

    Maya... I think dhuavan hai, ya kohra hai... Jis ke rehne se, kuch spashta dikhayi nahi deta... Hume ujala se, satya se door rakhta hai... Jaise koi hum andhe ho gaye hai... Vah arishtwarga se banta hai... And when purification happens, the light can be seen clearly leading to self discovery & self realisation... Namaste

  • @knowledgehub1498
    @knowledgehub14982 жыл бұрын

    Thanks guruji

  • @ganeshpaul8184
    @ganeshpaul8184 Жыл бұрын

    Very nice explore 👌👌👌👌🌹🌹🌹🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @shyamnarayantiwari4336
    @shyamnarayantiwari43364 жыл бұрын

    मैं आपके कई वीडियो देख चुका हूं गुरु जी, बढ़िया बताते है।वेदांत के बाद सांख्य के बारे में भी वीडियो बनाये।

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    kya aapne humare live Gita session attend kiye hai? every Saturday 7pm kzread.info/head/PLgiYC40Ul9jqAwLjbs358CbPV1DomGbxy

  • @sujitbhattacharya3115
    @sujitbhattacharya31152 жыл бұрын

    Guruji aapko sat sat pranam

  • @purnanandkarambelkar2400
    @purnanandkarambelkar24003 жыл бұрын

    Please make a detailed video on man buddhi chitta and ahankara

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Please join our Thursday session on "Sadhana " only on Zoom. Fill the Google form to get updates, u may also join Telegram. We are discussing this topic

  • @Av-vi5vs
    @Av-vi5vs4 жыл бұрын

    Thank you aapke video ka intezzar rahegaa.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    Every Saturday we come live on youtube for the "Essence of Gita" Today evening at 7pm (1st Saturday of every month ) kzread.info/dash/bejne/io2LqcWCkZDbeLw.html

  • @ATULSHARMA-jj4bh
    @ATULSHARMA-jj4bh3 жыл бұрын

    Sundar ji

  • @simranraina6291
    @simranraina62912 жыл бұрын

    Outstanding explanation sir. Thanks. Will u please create video on free will in Advaita vedanta.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    Sure

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    Please check QnA based on Bhagavad Gita and Advait Vedanta QnA Based on Bhagavad Gita And Advait Vedanta: Mostly in QnA 5,6 where we hv discussed about law of karma and concept of birth and death kzread.info/head/PLgiYC40Ul9joPl7PkoDoevx7B9Sg095Ka

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    U may watch QnA 5,6 where we hv talked about law of karma and concept of birth and death. Just check the playlist QnA questions and answers based on Bhagavad Gita and Vedanta

  • @ranjitdeshmukh6831
    @ranjitdeshmukh68312 жыл бұрын

    The.secret. To.know.without.thinking.that.you.are.GOD.

  • @nitishkumarmandal7984
    @nitishkumarmandal79843 жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir. ❤️🙏

  • @jyotsanasingh4769
    @jyotsanasingh47693 жыл бұрын

    Bahut acche se apne bataya, Thank you very much. Maya se hi humme confusion hota hai, Maya se hi humme bhrahman ka gayan hota hai

  • @hemangbipinshah
    @hemangbipinshah4 жыл бұрын

    "I know" is Maya! And "I don't known" is also a Maya Great explained. So just be Brahman and get out of all the confusion.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    That "I", the real " I" is not maya.. That is Atman.. That is Brahman. So know thyself.

  • @IrfanAli-db6kb

    @IrfanAli-db6kb

    3 жыл бұрын

    Other than " Brahm" No being have such attributes of perfection everything is Maya.

  • @chitravenkatsubramanian1807
    @chitravenkatsubramanian18074 жыл бұрын

    Concept of Maya made easy. Thank you Sir.

  • @ajayakumargandha1529
    @ajayakumargandha15294 жыл бұрын

    Excellent

  • @snehyadav5110
    @snehyadav51104 жыл бұрын

    Interesting way sir..boring nhi feel hotaa ...

  • @hemlatadevikar3189
    @hemlatadevikar31893 жыл бұрын

    What is mayatatv sir

  • @gamitsagar3490
    @gamitsagar34904 жыл бұрын

    Tq sir

  • @swatiupadhyay9709
    @swatiupadhyay97093 жыл бұрын

    Sir ....vikhshepan ko avidya keh sakte h

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Avidya causes aavaran and viksepa

  • @AryanSingh-dh7im
    @AryanSingh-dh7im2 жыл бұрын

    Sir from which book did you get knowledge plz suggest some books sir ❤️

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    Vedanta should be learned under the guidence of a traditional teacher. One should not study the shastra from book by oneself. It will cause confusion and misunderstanding. But, for Advait Vedanta follow shankar bhashya

  • @AryanSingh-dh7im

    @AryanSingh-dh7im

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji thanks guruji

  • @devkiputragitam...8966
    @devkiputragitam...89663 жыл бұрын

    aapko soundary lahri ke adhyayan ki aavashykta hai ... ..

  • @user-ge9nk5sj6m

    @user-ge9nk5sj6m

    4 ай бұрын

    Kyu bhai

  • @devkiputragitam...8966

    @devkiputragitam...8966

    4 ай бұрын

    ​@@user-ge9nk5sj6mमाया और ब्रम्ह के तादात्म्य हेतु

  • @user-ge9nk5sj6m

    @user-ge9nk5sj6m

    4 ай бұрын

    @@devkiputragitam...8966 ok Bhai

  • @joyjeetpaul2218
    @joyjeetpaul2218Ай бұрын

    Time - Space - Causation or, Name and Form is Maya.

  • @prateeksingh9681
    @prateeksingh96813 жыл бұрын

    ये कहानी कहाँ से लिऐ हो।

  • @drsudhirtaneja1227
    @drsudhirtaneja12274 жыл бұрын

    Brahm gyaan kaisey prapt karey sir

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    Please attend our live QnA session on every 1st Saturday of the month at 7pm. If possible we may take your Qn tommorow, 1st August 20.

  • @ashishrajacharya2837
    @ashishrajacharya28373 жыл бұрын

    Guru with due respect aptow Bramgyani hongya tow apka maya ha ki chaligahi

  • @bigfootvalley4480
    @bigfootvalley44802 жыл бұрын

    I have a question. You said in the video that brahman and maya are not two separate entities but actually one. You also gave the example of Projector and Reel, and said that the projector (brahman) shines through the reel of maya. But in my humble opinion, the projector has a separate existence and the reel too has a separate existence, isn't it? ... I mean, the projector can throw light from its end, even without the aid of the reel. Same way, the reel too can exist independently or separately when removed from the proximity of the projector. Since these two (projector and reel) have their own independent existences, is it any good to explain brahman and maya using their help? Thank you.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    We are using example from vyavahara jagat, transactional reality. So example will hv its limitation. But its Brahman's maya shakti which 1st veils the truth and then project it differently. Another common example we take is, Pot is actually clay. Pot is just naam Rupa, names and form. So pot perse has no existence w/o clay. But what we don't see is clay which is manifested as pot. Where as clay is the reality. Pot is mithya. In vyavahara, u call it pot, but in reality it's clay

  • @vimalaxidhagat1455
    @vimalaxidhagat14554 жыл бұрын

    Amazingly.... It is in the sleep state which is tamasic that happiness is experienced.

  • @rakeshdobhal416
    @rakeshdobhal4163 жыл бұрын

    ब्रह्मन नहीं , ब्रह्म है

  • @arkanjanchatterjee8102
    @arkanjanchatterjee81023 жыл бұрын

    Tell us about vedanta sara

  • @ashutoshprasad7579
    @ashutoshprasad75793 жыл бұрын

    सर परमात्मा और भगवान् और देवता क्या एक है या इनमे कुछ अंतर है प्लीज इसमें भी वीडियो बनाय प्लीज सर

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sure

  • @astroagnihotri

    @astroagnihotri

    3 жыл бұрын

    सुनने के बाद

  • @TheYellowshuttle
    @TheYellowshuttle3 жыл бұрын

    Excellent videos 👌 Guruji if Brahman is "One" why use the indirect word "advaita" (no two)? Why not use the direct word "Eka" (One)?

  • @kshatrapavan

    @kshatrapavan

    11 ай бұрын

    In vyavahāra i.e. superficially individual jīvas and jīva and īshvara exhibit dvaita. Dvaita is the most apparent and obvious state of being. Therefore, expressing that atman are one, and that ultimately even atman and brahman are not different requires negation of this illusion of dvaita-ness. Hence Advaita.

  • @manmathahaldar9221
    @manmathahaldar92213 жыл бұрын

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @rakeshjaywsal1005
    @rakeshjaywsal10053 жыл бұрын

    Jeev Maya me gira kyu

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    जीव माया का ही हिस्सा है Atma सदा थी और रहेगी भी Maya और Brahman दोनों अनादि है

  • @Advait_Vedanta
    @Advait_Vedanta12 күн бұрын

    Guruji agar Bramh ka Mul Sharoop Nirgun Nirakaar hein, to Shat , Chit , Anand, kiya Gun nehi hue, to Bramha mein to iea tin gun hein, to Bramh ko Nirgun kiu Kaha jata hein.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    12 күн бұрын

    उसके लिए in 3 गुणों को समझना होगा. क्यु की ये गुण नहीं है.

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava72573 жыл бұрын

    Can u explain this from Vedic scripture!!!!

  • @vijaypandhare3905
    @vijaypandhare3905 Жыл бұрын

    Confused परब्रह्म को ब्रह्म कह रहे है l ब्रह्म - माया एक joint phenomenon है l जिसे निचे दिये भी शब्दोमे वर्णन करते है l पुरुष - प्रकृती mind - matter नाम - रुप आभासी चेतन - जड

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    परब्रह्म and ब्रह्म और ब्रह्मन् are same As per traditional vedanta.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    Brahman and maya are not joined or so. It's bettet u learn from any traditional teacher or else such confusion is guaranteed .

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava72573 жыл бұрын

    Aavrn Shakti or vikchhep Shakti ka concept ramanandacharya ke phylosphy ka hissa hai.

  • @charvibakshi904
    @charvibakshi9043 жыл бұрын

    Sir if we take birth and then die and usually it is said that it's a circle and to break it..... we have to do bhakti.Right. What's the right way of doing bhakti in grahsth ashram?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    No. It's not bhakti to break the cycle. But it's the knowledge. Because ignorance is the cause. Bhakti is needed even to get knowledge from a teacher.

  • @charvibakshi904

    @charvibakshi904

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji sir how can we take your online classes.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Join our telegram group, U will be updated for all our sessions

  • @aeonsleo2
    @aeonsleo23 жыл бұрын

    Is Maya same for each person ? Does any other person or the objects exist because of someone else's avidya or it is just my Maya? Is my Maya same as your Maya or Is there is a common Maya ? If a person dies and is enlightened at the same time. His Maya ends but the generic maya lives on ? Who lives on and who is realised in this case ?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    It's not individual maya. It's Ishwara's shakti mool avidya, the root of all avidya. Because of this trigunatmika maya whole world manifests

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    When one gains knowledge he is free from maya

  • @aeonsleo2

    @aeonsleo2

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji Thank you Guruji. I have few more questions. If a person is enlightened he is free from Maya. Who is he in this case. Is he Brahman or an individual human personality? When you say a person is free from Maya, does he realize that he is not an individual but Brahman ? How does the Maya exist for him still ? Shouldn't the Maya disappear and along with that his form, identity the world etc like when one dies. If a person's reality is Brahman and if that is realized shouldn't the Brahman's avidya is rid off the the whole Maya collapses ? What exactly happens during individual's enlightenment and why the Maya for everyone else carries on ?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Realisation of one is like a dreamer waking up. What happens to his dream world.? What happens to a dreamer? What happens to other people in his dream?

  • @prakashrath9797
    @prakashrath97974 жыл бұрын

    🙏

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    🙏

  • @castelessaastik4655
    @castelessaastik4655 Жыл бұрын

    Sir, maya is attribute so how can it co exist with attributeless BRAHMAN ?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    I hv already answer this same question. Maya is not an attribute. Maya = that which is not. Maya is Ishwara's शक्ति, also known as avidya. As long as Brahman exist, possibility of non undstanding of Brahman exist in Brahman itself..

  • @swatiupadhyay9709
    @swatiupadhyay97093 жыл бұрын

    Gud afternoon sir...I wanna ask one question.....is Avidya hides brahman????

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Just as movie on the screen hides the screen

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    As though hides the Brahman.

  • @karamjitgaddu8015
    @karamjitgaddu8015 Жыл бұрын

    Maya serve the existiience of cosmos. So cosmos will keep going forever.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    Maya is anadi but not anant

  • @indraraj6812
    @indraraj68122 жыл бұрын

    Why Maya? If it is ananta who created Maya and why? Who created Brahmana and why?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    2 жыл бұрын

    No one created maya nor Brahman. They are anadi

  • @SambuddhaAkash
    @SambuddhaAkash2 жыл бұрын

    Your learning seems to be influenced by Maya.

  • @mahadevjyotish9772
    @mahadevjyotish97724 жыл бұрын

    गुरु जी वेदांत टॉपिक शुरू से समझाएं

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    Sure Jald hi Hum shuru karenge

  • @dishau7541
    @dishau75418 ай бұрын

    🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @satyamindnectar7052
    @satyamindnectar70522 жыл бұрын

    Brahman Alone Exist. As long as Brahman non understanding of Brahman also exist in Brahman (Expression of Brahman). We understood Brahaman in terms if this world..

  • @mahadevjyotish9772
    @mahadevjyotish97724 жыл бұрын

    वेदांत के अनुसार त्रिदेव की कोई परिकाष्ठा है वेदांत अनुसार त्रिदेवों के विषय में मार्गदर्शन करें

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    आपका मतलब ब्रह्मा विष्णु महेश से है?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    क्या आपने नया वीडियो देखा, "माया क्या है?" Ye अद्वैत वेदान्त का सबसे महत्तवपूर्ण विषय है. उसे समझे बिना advait Vedanta कभी नहीं समझ सकते.

  • @mahadevjyotish9772

    @mahadevjyotish9772

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji जी गुरु जी माया के बारे में मैंने वीडियो देखा क्या माया के सत्त्व रज तम गुण ही त्रिदेव हैं

  • @mahadevjyotish9772

    @mahadevjyotish9772

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji जी बिल्कुल

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    4 жыл бұрын

    नहीं

  • @freecourses1284
    @freecourses1284 Жыл бұрын

    Guruji apka contect nomber dijiye 🙏

  • @satyampandey9444
    @satyampandey94447 ай бұрын

    Sir Maya KZread channel ko aap subscribe karna ka liya kha raha hai to ya bhi Maya hai KZread channel ka subscriber jada ho gaya ya bhi to Maya hai

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    7 ай бұрын

    Haan sab maya hi hai, 😊 Channel bhi, knowledge bhi. Aap bhi mai bhi. Subscribe bhi. Isiliye koi issue nahi hai. We don't mix satyam and mithya.

  • @satyampandey9444

    @satyampandey9444

    7 ай бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji aap ko glat samajna hamara udsay nhi tha sir bas man ma question aaya puch liya satyam kay hai sir

  • @freecourses1284
    @freecourses1284 Жыл бұрын

    To me kon hu?

  • @pavansalame
    @pavansalame3 жыл бұрын

    महाराज जी अभीभी नही समजे माया का मतलब प्रकृति, सृष्टि ,माया ओर दुर्गा ये मा दुर्गा जी के नाम है उनिके फैलाये जाल मे फसकर जीव लख चौरासी में भटकते रहता है

  • @thegaming5115
    @thegaming5115 Жыл бұрын

    Sir kya shadi karni chahiye? meri age 25 hai aur main job kar raha hoon.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    I was just thinking to make a video on this topic Or perhaps we may take it in QnA session

  • @thegaming5115

    @thegaming5115

    Жыл бұрын

    Ek topic aur hai ki badhti hui population mein बच्चे paida karne chahiye ya nahi. Please cover this topic on that video.

  • @vinayakashenoyk4622
    @vinayakashenoyk46223 жыл бұрын

    Why we are cobwebbed in old philosophy let us explore ,we are hanging on the old examples given like rajju sarpa ,three kinds of state is jagrat Swapna and susupti we are not giving the importance to our realisation only juggling in Sanskrit words 🙏 Advaitis impose themselves impose false entity on reality and telling us to remove ,that is their adhyaropaapavada theory .

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ok 1st do one thing. Now make 2+2=5 New mathematics. Ask sun to rise from west. Ask gravitation to pull up. Ask fire to change its nature to spread coolness. Before blabbering, try to understand atleast 1%of our ancient knowledge

  • @vinayakashenoyk4622

    @vinayakashenoyk4622

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji sir with due respect I am not at all arguing or counter acting ,because I agree that I am ajnani and try to know the truth even we can say there is nothing to know we only forgot the real truth about ourselve as mentioned in yoga sutras .And about 2+2=5 ,the Mathematica is only a tool to define natural phenomena ,this maths is ok for vyavaharika but fails in explain nature so later equation come like 2x+2y=5 ,now to failing to bind the nature in modern mathematics like Einstein theory ,topology etc the process is going on but failing .I am extremely sorry if I hurt by any means ,only by realisation one may know the truth but who has to know ?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    1st get the knowledge, go to near by traditional teacher offline or online. Attend the regular session, systematically. Ask Questions if you don't understand before making any sweeping statement. It was not hurting me but insult to our age old proven shastras and rishis.

  • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot
    @AnkurSingh-mh9ot Жыл бұрын

    Guruji this means reincarnation is not true at all right? As there is no individual jiva. There is just brahman. There is only one soul and that is brahman.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    U r mixing 2different levels. From पारमार्थिक point of view, there is only Brahman. From व्यावहारिक point of view see duality. Brahman is as its para prakrati Brahman as जगत, jiva, सृष्टि, its apara prakrati. Like for example, U are u as jiva, the individual. That is ur reality in this example, but u are also a son, a student, a brother, a friend, a citizen etc. But all these are ur different manifestation, roles.

  • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot

    @AnkurSingh-mh9ot

    Жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji Guru ji sorry I cannot read hindi I guess what I am saying Guru ji is that brahman is never born and never dies. Only individual body dies. And it is individual body which has ego and mind and any concept of soul/jiva. What my body and mind right now is due to genetics, upbringing/nuture, and so.e desires of others mind-body systems that are not here anymore in which ever way god wanted. Thank You Guru ji!

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    I wl suggest you to watch other videos also in the same series. Mainly 3 orders of reality. Vedanta is not newspaper or novel or self help book nor a pep talk which any can just read and understand. There are various levels, to unfold. To understand vedanta we really need that shraddha and commitment and consistent effort More than what we need to understand mathematics. So have patience and go step by step. One should never jump to any conclusion.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    Do want us to make videos in English also?

  • @AnkurSingh-mh9ot

    @AnkurSingh-mh9ot

    Жыл бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji Replying to both comments Sure Guruji that will be nice too. Hum hindi bol aur samhaj sakte hei, lekin hum India se bahar pedha hui teh toh par nehe sakta huin haha I agree Guru ji. For last 4 years I am constantly thinking about this and self examining and trying to learn. But different people give different answers. The view I have right now is built off of hours of thinking. But to explain it I would need to write a few pages. Maybe if its ok I can email you and when you have time I can discuss. Thank You Guruji Ankur

  • @prajyotkerkar2452
    @prajyotkerkar24522 ай бұрын

    Ma bap vo moh maya hai

  • @ravidhyani1011
    @ravidhyani10113 жыл бұрын

    Mere ko kuch bhi samajh mein nahi aaya

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd
    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd6 ай бұрын

    ब्रम्ह तो बदलता नहीं है लेकिन संसार तो लगातार बदल रहा है तो ब्रम्ह संसार कैसे हो सकता है?

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    6 ай бұрын

    ब्रह्म संसार नहीं है, संसार ब्रह्म है मिट्टी घड़ा नहीं है, घडा मिट्टी है. घड़ा बदलता है मिट्टी नहीं

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    6 ай бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji आप कह रहे हैं कि संसार ब्रम्ह है तो फिर चलायमान जगत अचल ब्रम्ह कैसे हो सकता है? साक्षी ब्रह्म निर्गुण है, साक्षी ब्रम्ह का कोई रूप नहीं है, साक्षी का कोई व्यवहार नहीं है क्योंकि वह निर्गुण है, साक्षी ब्रम्ह अचल है और संसार में तीन गुण हैं, संसार में नाम, रूप और व्यवहार है, संसार चलायमान है तो फिर गुणवान जगत निर्गुण ब्रह्म कैसे हो सकता है? कृपया बताएँ।

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    6 ай бұрын

    माया triginatmika है. Shift the vision. Again I m repeating ब्रह्म जगत नहीं, माया की वज़ह से ब्रह्म जगत के रूप मे प्रतीत होता है Try to understand pot and clay example

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    6 ай бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji माया कैसे एक ब्रह्म(existence consciousness bliss) को बहुत रूप में दिखाती है, कैसे एक consciousness को अलग-अलग शरीर में दिखाती है?

  • @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    @AdarshSingh-fi7pd

    6 ай бұрын

    @@VedantaGuruji माया को काटे कैसे?

  • @bhaskaravadvaith8231
    @bhaskaravadvaith82313 жыл бұрын

    Your explanation of Advaitha has full if dvaita in it, in step 2 it’s mentioned “as long as brahman exists “ the word as long as represents time and brahman is beyond time brahman can’t be “as long as” because brahman is the only that exists, “as long as brahman exists” also raises the question what after brahman ceases to exist hope u understand this question is wrong and also ur explanation. Next in example of film and projector the light is mentioned as brahman how can a light be compared to brahman as light keeps constantly changing brahman never changes the screen is always compared to brahman this is common example and please refer good source regarding this example Next in clay and pot example it’s mentioned “not to understand clay as clay is present in clay only” its like telling not to understand brahman as brahman is present in brahman only but unfortunately ur giving complete explanation for maya so not to understand clay as clay is not in clay but it’s in maya Tamas gives dravya shakti it would be really good if a source for this is mentioned It would be better if you understand the difference between anandamaya kosha and brahmananda please mention the reference which says ananda of brahman exhibits tamas shakti dont u think u need to understand properly before making video and adding ‘um’ to each word doesn’t make u expert in Sanskrit as there are no words like that

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    U need to understand what I hv said. Go beyond words. Try to. Understand the explanation.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    When I said as long as Brahman exists,... Their is pun in my saying. And ofcourse we mean and maintain that Brahman अलोन exists. But for people who are exposed to the topic for the 1st time, we hv to go step by step

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    In the example of film and screen and light, yes I chose to say light as Brahman. Because screen may be there or not like in virtual reality, but no projection is possible w/o light. Light is subtler than screen, more pervasive. Also, this is not traditional example. And I will firmly maintain the same. You may think again and try to come out of preconceived, set ideas. Think originally

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    And yes non understanding of clay as clay, this potential is there only in Brahman. Because Brahman alone exists. And that non understanding is mool avidya, maya. Non understanding of something which doesn't exist, is not possible. And existence of maya is dependent on Brahman not independant.

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ofcourse anandmaya kosha is not brahmanad. Anandmaya is the known experience, brahmanad is not known. So principle of knowledge is we move from the known to the unknown. One cannot teach unknown from unknown.

  • @DeepakKumar-ju2nd
    @DeepakKumar-ju2nd4 жыл бұрын

    आप खुद ही confused हैं ! सत रज तम जब माया के गुण हैं तो माया का अस्तित्व सिद्ध हुआ इस लिए मूलभूत द्रव्य तीन सिद्ध होते हैं, आत्मा ,परमात्मा और प्रकृति , सत को तो हम परमात्मा मे मिला सकते हैं किंतु तम व रज को परमात्मा का हिस्सा कहें तो परमात्मा मे दोष आ जाएगा क्योकि तम ही जड़ है, न वह आत्मा है न परमात्मा !इससे प्रकृति भी अनादि सिद्ध हुई!!

  • @veershorts5142

    @veershorts5142

    Жыл бұрын

    आत्मा यानी परमात्मा तो इन तीनों गुणों से परे हैं। और सांख्य दर्शन के अनुसार तो भगवान ने सृष्टि बनाई ही नहीं है क्योंकि भगवान को ये दुनिया बनाने की कोई जरूरत ही नहीं है।

  • @VedantaGuruji

    @VedantaGuruji

    Жыл бұрын

    Yes. Even as per Advait Vedanta ishwar has not created.... This is subject to understand or else it wl lead to total confusion

  • @blaa...blaaa...blaaaa

    @blaa...blaaa...blaaaa

    Жыл бұрын

    आत्मा परमात्मा में कोई भेद नही है मूर्ख, द्वेष बुद्धि के धनि जाहिल, पहले अपने कॉन्सेप्ट क्लियर कर किसी ओर खुद से पढ़ यूट्यूब ज्ञानी मत बन शास्त्र ज्ञानी बन… ओर परमात्मा के गुण उनके कार्यों के कारण है ना कि उनमें कोई विकार है…

  • @zkx-ly6on

    @zkx-ly6on

    9 ай бұрын

    Sahi hai

  • @sangeetapathak1675

    @sangeetapathak1675

    6 ай бұрын

    Confused हैं , का अर्थ हुआ भृमित हैं अर्थात माया-ग्रस्त हैं , तो इसमें हर्ज क्या है ? ......आप कहीं मायापति तो नहीं ?

  • @rakhiyadav5193
    @rakhiyadav51933 жыл бұрын

    vedant hi mochya hai

  • @harikrishan5031
    @harikrishan50313 жыл бұрын

    Bahut bakwas banaya hai

  • @rishabhyadav6705

    @rishabhyadav6705

    11 ай бұрын

    Phle dimag ho ga na tab smj ayega dimag ne dham ye sab ka gobar jo bhar liya hai abrahmic bakwas bate jo sun li hai kaha smj ayegi philosophy 😂😂

  • @miteshrajsrivastava7257
    @miteshrajsrivastava72573 жыл бұрын

    This phylosphy is anti vedic.

  • @vikassutariya8323

    @vikassutariya8323

    3 жыл бұрын

    Give praman🙏

  • @satyamindnectar7052

    @satyamindnectar7052

    Жыл бұрын

    This Philosophy is Vedic. Iskcon philosophy is anti vedic.

  • @rishabhyadav6705

    @rishabhyadav6705

    11 ай бұрын

    😂😂vedic kal ki ek matra philosophy yahi hai tune sare shastra padh liya jo tum claim kar rha ki ye anti vedic ki bas iskcon ke hagupad ke sex slavo ki bat sun ke aa gya bta har ek shastra me ek matra advaita hai ye dikha skta tum jaise nitthale abrahmic to madhyakalin bharat me panpe aur unhe ke vicharo se prabhawit aur tum Abramico ne sanatan me ghusa diya jaise ki dham jana hai 😂😂 0:03

  • @nandakishorbarik9010
    @nandakishorbarik90103 жыл бұрын

    Thanks guruji

  • @manmathahaldar9221
    @manmathahaldar92213 жыл бұрын

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @kshudhashantimisalgruha2601
    @kshudhashantimisalgruha260110 ай бұрын

    🙏

Келесі