Living without a why: what if Eckhart succeeded? Saint Eckhart?

What if Eckhart won? St Eckhart? What is "living without a why"? Eckhart Tolle, Zen, and more
Dr. Johnson teaches philosophy at Georgia Tech. He is the author of Paradox at Play: Metaphor in Meister Eckhart's Sermons by Catholic University of America Press. It includes many sermons never before translated into English.
Meister Eckhart, Paradox at Play
amzn.to/3y6HV9W
All Amazon links are affiliate links, which means I do get a commission on them. That doesn't change the price for you - it just helps to support the channel and get more ideas out there!
Check out my store for t-shirts and more:
good-to-think-with.printify.m...
Special thanks to my Patreon supporters!
If you want to support the channel directly and get more involved with the process of making videos and interacting with me, please consider supporting the channel on Patreon:
/ goodtothinkwith
I hope you found these ideas good to think with!

Пікірлер: 7

  • @pro5702
    @pro5702Ай бұрын

    I’d like to hear how Eckhart's idea of "living without a why" creates meaning and is a defense against Nihilism. And contrast that with Nietzsche's idea that "he who has a why to live can bear almost any how." Having a clear purpose or reason for living (a "why") can provide the strength and motivation to endure even the most difficult circumstances or challenges (the "how"). This seems like a more robust defense against nihilism.

  • @slottibarfast5402
    @slottibarfast5402Ай бұрын

    Very nicely done. People need an open mind to examine some of the variety of thoughts out there even when in the end you disagree.

  • @goodtothinkwith

    @goodtothinkwith

    Ай бұрын

    Thanks! Yes indeed…

  • @MinnesotanMysticism
    @MinnesotanMysticismАй бұрын

    This was absolutely incredible to think with! Zen of Eckhart for Christ!

  • @goodtothinkwith

    @goodtothinkwith

    Ай бұрын

    I’m so glad you enjoyed it! 😄

  • @AutumnSonderness
    @AutumnSondernessАй бұрын

    About 7:22 - but does the claim that Eckhart was a mystic not interfere with his rigorous philosophical method? If anything, he rather can be understood as an intellectualist in the sense that the divine intellect had precedence per se?

  • @goodtothinkwith

    @goodtothinkwith

    Ай бұрын

    I think it enhances it. Philosophy should always be involved in lived experience, in my opinion. Plato wrote dialogues after all