One of the best explainations i ever seen on the smith chart

I really liked this lecture and explanation approach to the Smith Chart. Great work!

Excellent explanation! Thanks a lot for this very clear explanations!

Thank you for teaching, it is very useful and not very easy to find on the internet in a systematic form like you have.

Thanks for this perfect explanation. Espetially for the example with the complex net.

very impressive, great work

Superb! Thank you for this.

Thank you.. this what engineering is suppose to do.. turn sometime complex and make it easy to understand..

Thanks a lot i really needed this.

very good explanation thanks a lot

Klasse, toll erklärt!

Ich mochte Ihre Erklärung, vielen Dank, Professor. Ich habe das übersetzt, weil ich nicht gut Deutsch spreche.

Thank you very much

Thank you!

Very nice lecture, thanks for this series! One quick question : In the example of angle rotation due to the insertion of a TL to a load, at 38:00, 0.3λ is added as an angle rotation to Z_L in Smith chart in order to calculate Z ' in. However 0.3λ corresponds to 1 times the length of the TL. Shouldn't we be considering 2 times the length of the TL instead, since the wave needs to travel twice the distance of the TL as you also mentioned : (step 1: Incident wave first travels towards the load from the generator covering distance 0.3λ, step 2: incident wave reaches the load and gets reflected back, and step 3: Reflected wave needs to travel from the load back towards the generator covering another 0.3λ), hence in total we have 2 * 0.3λ = 0.6λ ? So in the Smith chart should we rotate by 0.3λ or 0.6λ ? Any comment / clarification would be much appreciated! Thanks again!

@ajiths1689

Жыл бұрын

It is 0.3 lambda only ... becoz we are rotating the load

thanks man

thanks

You're using the other root. t^2-2*tan(θ)-1 r:=tan(θ)±sec(θ)

Invented by Mizuhashi Tosaku in 1937, the Mizuhashi Chart.

Nice lecture. At 21:01 the right most blue curve on the bottom should be labeled -1 not 1/2.

Wow🤯👌👌👌👌👏👏👏👏👏