Always remember to establish the facts and to flush out the topics BEFORE trying to pin a deponent on a point. Otherwise, you risk jumping the gun and losing a lot of momentum. At the very least, you want the other side to leave the deposition and be concerned about your cross examination at trial. That way you can have some negotiation leverage. But, if the deponent is the one controlling the deposition, then you may lose that leverage as well.

Not a lawyer, but I enjoy watching the nitty gritty of law both good and bad. Thanks for sharing and giving your expertise.

@LawVenture

2 жыл бұрын

You're most welcome

Superb info! Thanks!

The one dislike is probably from Michael Rapaport's lawyer XD

@LawVenture

2 жыл бұрын

10/10 comment right here

@flutebasket4294

10 ай бұрын

I wouldn't be so sure that Rapaport has that much money

"That went well" -- damn

Can I do anything about being denied to attend a deposition my public defender said there was no room for me where it was being held and he said , “ I know what to ask”.. I had allegations against me the whole nine yards and after over 2 years my case was dismissed. Can you give me any adviser or anything on this? Thank you, D. Wilkes

@betterlucktomorrow7957

Жыл бұрын

Why do you want to be there when you’re not being deposed?

Please do more legal reactions. There arent enough practical insights to law on YT

@LawVenture

2 жыл бұрын

We’re planning to release another one early March 🙌

It is astounding to me that someone of Rappaport’s means would have hired a lawyer this horrible

This is edifying; I am glad that the shirt is not shown.

It’s the compound nature of the predicate question that makes it ineffective.

@LawVenture

2 жыл бұрын

I'd take it a step further by saying that it's the compound nature of the question and the lack of predicate that makes it ineffective.

@GeorgeTaylor-hb9jp

9 ай бұрын

The opposing attorney should have objected to the question as compound and thus unintelligible.

Bottom line- having been there, seen that is to DESTROY you--they have tons of notes and you have to try to remember everything without any notes-- they are relentless!

13:20 lol dave owned that guy hard.

How do I stop the typed in verbage? They are distracting

I figured out how to turn off the close caption part. Just not tech savy lol

"i don't want to make assumptions here" that's literally you're only job on youtube. lawyerin' ain't on youtube. this is a platform designed for speculation and speculation is important. Anyone can google precedents, if you're not taking legal knowledge and using it to speculate then you aren't providing value to your audience. "Silence is golden" if this is true then be quiet. But if you want to talk to us, the audience, you need to talk about the future and that requires actually make predictions that could be wrong.

By golly, who needs Hollywood when you have sextortion, lies and dramatic court trials on KZread? As an aside, a channel for "aspiring lawyers" probably isn't served by obvious personal armchair comments about a licensed attorney's performance. Bush league stuff. I'm researching my own case and appreciate the contribution.

No offense but the word is commenting, not commentating. This is an interesting topic bc this guy thrives on being outrageous. He is an outlier and makes money off same. This deposition gave him an opportunity to elaborate and control the deposer right throughout.

@LawVenture

2 жыл бұрын

No offense taken!

@rodswift3423

9 ай бұрын

Commentate is used for sports

I don't care if the lawyer screwed up. The witness is smug as hell and obnoxious.

@rodswift3423

9 ай бұрын

Nobody cares about your comment

@tonycamaj4560

8 ай бұрын

Irrelevant