Laplace Transform: Translation Theorem in s
Laplace transform property: Translation Theorem of Laplace Transform, namely L{e^(at)f(t)}
Laplace Transformation (ultimate study guide) 👉 • Laplace Transform Ulti...
Get a Laplace Transform For You t-shirt 👉 bit.ly/laplacetee
Support this channel via patron 👉 / blackpenredpen
playlist: 👉 bit.ly/2YFUVFE
Пікірлер: 34
i saw so many other video but i swear this is the best, i love all ur teaching videos
you are now my favourite math tutor sir
AND THE OUTFIT GOES CRAZY HARD!!!
I get confused when blackpenredpen uses blue pen. Other than that, keep up the good work!
@blackpenredpen
7 жыл бұрын
lol
The cartwheel got me good lol...
At 3:58 the legendary technique was shown
Thanks man! You're seriously the GOAT for math videos.
God bless this man.
Thank you very much! subscribed:)
Thank you
Hi Steve, do you have a video with the laplace transform differentiation theorem proof?
plz put all laplace sums in a playlist and this for all topics . thank u awesome teacher:)
@blackpenredpen
4 жыл бұрын
You want something better? Search “Laplace marathon” and “inverse Laplace marathon” on YT and you will see it.
you are awesome. I understand this shit because of you. but yeah that cartwheel was the best part in the video. thanks again man. hopefully you do linear algebra sometimes because I'm doing that next semester lol
goated teacher
Which of the following sequences could represent the impulse response of a stable discrete-time system? k^2 (-0.65)^k 2^k ksin(k)
However, there is a formula for inverse Laplace transform of product of functions F(s)&G(s), Inverse Laplace (F(s)*G(s)) = integral from 0 to t of f(t-v)*g(v)dv (i.e, convolution of f(t)&g(t)), where F(s) & G(s) are Laplace transforms of f(t) & g(t) respectively
1:23
i wonder how it is possible to do integration by parts with three functions may it can be helpfull to show why there are is no good solution to the Problem L(f(t)g(t))=?. Can you make a proove for my question
Good vid. If you want more hits, get 'First Shifting Theorem' in the title (that's what some other books etc refer to it as).
im paying so much money to go to school and im still learning off of youtube, take my prof 2 hours to poorly try to explain what he did in 10 min
I will become you disciple someday.
yo what about L{e^-3t*f(t-4)} is it F(s+3)*e^-4s
There is not next vídeo KK KK
@weinihao3632
5 жыл бұрын
:,(
Here from chegg comment
@blackpenredpen
6 жыл бұрын
OH WOW!!!
@blackpenredpen
6 жыл бұрын
Do u have the link? I am just curious.
@IIIIBallPythonsIIIII
6 жыл бұрын
www.chegg.com/homework-help/A-First-Course-in-Differential-Equations-with-Modeling-Applications-10th-edition-chapter-7.3-problem-1E-solution-9781111827052
@blackpenredpen
6 жыл бұрын
IIIIBallPythonsIIIII thanks but I can't view it since I don't have an account. Would u mind taking a screenshot and tweet it to me or send it to my email at blackpenredpen@gmail.com
@normansabin8322
6 жыл бұрын
blackpenredpen that's why I was confused. I sent u the screenshots. @gmail
I belive convolution theorm can be a direct formula to solve this: L{f(t)g(t)} = F(s)*G(s) Conversely, L{f(t)*g(t)} = F(s)G(s) However, the later form is of more practical usage in analog and digital filter design than the former form.. ☺️
my problem L {(1 / a) * e ^ (- bt / a) * f (t / a)} I could not solve