Келесі
- 1:14:51
- 10 М.
- 45:57
- 71 М.
- 08:53
- 35 МЛН
- 11 күн бұрын
- 00:45
- 14 МЛН
- 22 күн бұрын
- 00:14
- 63 МЛН
- 22 күн бұрын
- 44:30
- 9 М.
- 19:27
- 296 М.
- 54:30
- 18 М.
- 59:54
- 36 М.
- 1:07:09
- 255 М.
- 34:36
- 12 М.
- 1:04:24
- 6 М.
- 48:49
- 73 М.
- 1:30:18
- 528 М.
- 08:53
- 35 МЛН
- 11 күн бұрын
Пікірлер: 12
best ever explanation of Kant's philosophy .my heartiest praise to Michael b Brezinsky
You have a natural gift for explaining things with clarity. I'm grateful to have discovered these lectured. Cheers from The Netherlands
Mr Brezinsky has to be a real genius! How he understands all those philosophers... I´m impressed.
thank you so much professor Brezinsky may God bless you. i have really enjoyed your lessons.
Thank you for posting your lectures. You are some how able to take the most complex topics and present them with great clarity. I only wish there were more.
Amazingly lucid explanation. Thank you. Please do more lectures.
Thank you for this video. This explanation has been the best so far.
Thought this lecture was great. Thanks.
thanks for the lecture. i wish i had the time in college to take this course.
thank you professor brezinsky
Please why Kant "cant" admit that our intuitions of space and time may be, to Time and Space "as thy could be in themselves", like phenomenas are to the things in themselves ? Kant himself talk about Analogy in the "Prolegomena". Berkley is more consequent when hi says that things don't exist. If we admit that things exist in themselves, as humans, we must recognize that they exist in a kind of space and time ; Time in itself and Space in itself, that we can not know how thy are. We can't think the word "exist" without a space and a time. We are "designed" to have intuitions of time and space, and to have perceptions of things in themselves, because things and space-time are independent of us. Excuse my bad English
@Philiopantheon82
7 жыл бұрын
hmersoul، very good question there!! I sort of think about it this way though; space and time are much more like attributes than the real essence of things in itself, namely what Kant trying to impinge on our mind that human reason cant recognize the essence of things itself solely through experience and with that kept in mind space and time are not parts of essence of things in themselves. Its as if without our cognition there will be no such things as space and time.