Kaman K-Max Dual Intermeshing Rotor Helicopter Demo - AIN

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

Kaman Aerospace has delivered the first new-build K-Max “Aerial Truck” helicopter since the first nine-year production run ended in 2003. The bright orange helicopter is now on its way to northeast China, where it will be used primarily for firefighting. Before packing it up for shipment, Kaman put it through its paces at the factory in Bloomfield, Connecticut. Unless you work there, watching a K-Max’s intermeshing rotors spin up is a sight you don’t see every day.
#aviation #helicopter #aircraft

Пікірлер: 700

  • @geethsan1567
    @geethsan15675 жыл бұрын

    I have never been so anxious for a helicopter.

  • @richardnixon5499

    @richardnixon5499

    5 жыл бұрын

    I just kept expecting it to chop itself to bits 😂

  • @carlfitzpatrick5864

    @carlfitzpatrick5864

    5 жыл бұрын

    This is the second type helicopter built by Kaman with this rotor configuration the other was the husky built for the Air Force back in the 1960’s I think

  • @jamesfieweger8648

    @jamesfieweger8648

    5 жыл бұрын

    Carl Fitzpatrick, no, it’s far from the second. Kaman has designed and built no fewer than ten different types of intermeshing rotor helicopters.

  • @carlfitzpatrick5864

    @carlfitzpatrick5864

    5 жыл бұрын

    James Fieweger which ones are they I’m curious I only new about the two

  • @jamesfieweger8648

    @jamesfieweger8648

    5 жыл бұрын

    Carl Fitzpatrick, my bad it was only nine. They are the K-125, K-190, K-225, K-1125, HTK, HOK, HUK, HH-43 and the K-MAX.

  • @ryanhampson673
    @ryanhampson6736 жыл бұрын

    K max is the ant of the helicopter world, it’s lifting capacity to weight ratio is nuts.

  • @fobgalore

    @fobgalore

    5 жыл бұрын

    Ryan Hampson so it's wight lifting capacity is how many nuts? Don’t say 69.

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    5 жыл бұрын

    yeah wonder why not more helicopters went with this design... what are pros and cons of it

  • @zachburke8906

    @zachburke8906

    5 жыл бұрын

    Jebi Se size is probably a pro, stability would likely be one, maybe even reduced vibrations. Complexity would likely be a big negative, lower durability.

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    5 жыл бұрын

    no this is very simple design actually...

  • @zachburke8906

    @zachburke8906

    5 жыл бұрын

    Jebi Se very simple? I mean it can’t be that simple, gearing and stuff would make this more complex and more prone to failure than just one rotor, wouldn’t it?

  • @asgpu414
    @asgpu4145 жыл бұрын

    My high school is only 10 min. Away from the factory so I see these K-Max's perform test flights all the time out the window. They are awesome

  • @supremeleader5516

    @supremeleader5516

    2 жыл бұрын

    Great

  • @atomicwedgie8176

    @atomicwedgie8176

    Жыл бұрын

    Get your nose back into your studies and quit looking out the window or you'll grow up to be a retard!

  • @z3lrin382

    @z3lrin382

    Ай бұрын

    Ah you got a really nice view from your school 🫡

  • @ramzidz6150

    @ramzidz6150

    Ай бұрын

    you are so lucky

  • @dennisbrucemasayon786
    @dennisbrucemasayon7865 жыл бұрын

    Its like chinook on a tight budget😂

  • @xcalibertrekker6693

    @xcalibertrekker6693

    5 жыл бұрын

    Very Very tight budget.

  • @Northernliiights

    @Northernliiights

    5 жыл бұрын

    Or a thai hooker with broken ankles.

  • @mrnickbig1

    @mrnickbig1

    5 жыл бұрын

    Actually, it looks like a German Flettner Kolibri Fl-282 military helicopter from WW2, the original eggbeater. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lYOEwY97k7Wzgrw.html

  • @EguiulNava

    @EguiulNava

    5 жыл бұрын

    On a slim budget xD

  • @joshua.harazin

    @joshua.harazin

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Sk.2500 while the Chinook's rotor discs don't overlap as much, they do overlap due to the increased angle of the front rotor head.

  • @Rickster5176
    @Rickster51766 жыл бұрын

    It's the quietest helicopter I've ever seen.

  • @68404

    @68404

    5 жыл бұрын

    Do you hear with your eyes?

  • @tomthompson7400

    @tomthompson7400

    5 жыл бұрын

    who said that ,,, was it you ,, i saw your ears move.... lol

  • @waynearrington6727

    @waynearrington6727

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes, it's noise footprint is quite low for an observer on the ground. However, in the cockpit it is very noisy. In the prominent bulge just over the top of the cockpit are blowers to cool engine and transmission oil. Those fans are incredibly noisy and after 8 or 9 hours you are a crazy man from the noise.

  • @GordonGarvey

    @GordonGarvey

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@waynearrington6727 isn't that why one uses noise cancelling headphones?

  • @TankMaster1998

    @TankMaster1998

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Jay M how do you hear a written statement

  • @ErikStenbakken
    @ErikStenbakken11 ай бұрын

    I watched one of these dropping mulch for post fire mitigation. It was alternating loads with a Huey. The K-max was literally doubling load size over the Huey. And at way lower altitude with more nimble delivery. Such an amazing task machine!

  • @shmookins
    @shmookins5 жыл бұрын

    1:10 I am always constantly surprised by German ingenuity. They were a head of the times in many inventions. Just remarkable.

  • @bazzhm1447

    @bazzhm1447

    2 жыл бұрын

    Dude thats not german.. nazi made kalibri and NOT use 2pack of rotorblade. K max purely american inventions. Like bell , its started in and on capitalis garage.

  • @Zothaqqua

    @Zothaqqua

    Жыл бұрын

    @@bazzhm1447 "Flettner [the German] became the chief designer of Kaman Aircraft and many of the Flettner design concepts are found in Kaman helicopters of later years." -- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Flettner

  • @nezuminezuminezumi7266

    @nezuminezuminezumi7266

    11 ай бұрын

    It Kind of makes your wonder what the world would have been like if the right side won.

  • @foooosh

    @foooosh

    6 ай бұрын

    ​@@nezuminezuminezumi7266so you support the side who encouraged ethnic cleansing?

  • @gnak2
    @gnak26 жыл бұрын

    shipped to china for firefighting? in north east china same north east china where harbin helicopter company is located u know they just gonna reverse engineer it

  • @nurbsenvi

    @nurbsenvi

    6 жыл бұрын

    They will try.

  • @henry2008kim

    @henry2008kim

    6 жыл бұрын

    Trust me.. no one gonna by jumping to buy a chinese intermeshing helicopter 🙃

  • @steve1978ger

    @steve1978ger

    5 жыл бұрын

    Sangyoon Kim, idk, that's what they used to say about Japanese cars.

  • @johnweiland9389

    @johnweiland9389

    5 жыл бұрын

    Has to be perfect replica or its going to crash and burn.

  • @pdx96

    @pdx96

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Skelotor Two I believe it's for the same reason. If you look at the early Japanese automotive industry, it was the copy of the European cars. The Kenmeri Skyline was a copy of an American muscle. Through it all, they had an international team and partnership like Ford and Mazda. Now you see partnerships such as Toyota with Jinbei and an assembly of an international team like Nio. It's the same curve for Korean cars. The reason for such perception is exposure.

  • @testy462
    @testy4625 жыл бұрын

    Lol. Who are the nine people that dislike this? You have a beef with a certain type of helicopter?

  • @Kodamagnum24

    @Kodamagnum24

    5 жыл бұрын

    I'm not very fond of the fact that its going to be sent to the Chinese.

  • @genaddi1234

    @genaddi1234

    5 жыл бұрын

    that's called free market

  • @louiscypher4186

    @louiscypher4186

    5 жыл бұрын

    fucking NAZI tech

  • @c4pt1n54no

    @c4pt1n54no

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Kodamagnum24 get over yourself or do us all a favor and don't share your opinion on society, it's very backwards my friend

  • @threeomgthree

    @threeomgthree

    5 жыл бұрын

    Kodamagnum24 why? Its not even a battle chopper. Its for fighting fires. You are a strange dude.

  • @HerezCheez
    @HerezCheez5 жыл бұрын

    Suddenly everyone is a mechanical engineer in the comment section.

  • @brainmind4070

    @brainmind4070

    5 жыл бұрын

    HerezCheez Maybe they are. I am. I don't think this kind of video is attracting mainly fashionistas.

  • @alexhutchins6161

    @alexhutchins6161

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@brainmind4070 I am not a mechanic but I'd be happy if you considered me one.

  • @brainmind4070

    @brainmind4070

    5 жыл бұрын

    Alex Hutchins And you would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for your meddling comment!

  • @Tragicide

    @Tragicide

    5 жыл бұрын

    HerezCheez Suddenly some dumbass outta nowhere doesn’t like it when people talk about the topic of the video.

  • @LunaStarFire

    @LunaStarFire

    5 жыл бұрын

    Im a mechanical design engineer, but working as a process engineer =P

  • @oneeco
    @oneeco5 жыл бұрын

    And I just found about this now?!?!

  • @encarn

    @encarn

    5 жыл бұрын

    me too

  • @GersonSalvador

    @GersonSalvador

    3 жыл бұрын

    What about me? Haha

  • @DJSbros
    @DJSbros5 жыл бұрын

    The engineering is astonishing.

  • @WUZLE
    @WUZLE3 жыл бұрын

    We get these at the airfield I work out. Nothing else makes a sound like a K-Max, they are extremely cool.

  • @brendaproffitt1011
    @brendaproffitt10117 жыл бұрын

    Totally incredible it looks..great information on these rotors and the capabilities of it and other helicopters too..Awesome job on this video too..I do greatly appreciate it alot thank you so much for your videos too..

  • @archisman20
    @archisman205 жыл бұрын

    The intermeshing blades!!!! Scary and beautiful at the same time. I feel like saying I want one for Christmas 🤣

  • @backyardgarage912
    @backyardgarage9125 жыл бұрын

    The counter-rotating props provide for a smooth smooth ride!

  • @lknanml
    @lknanml5 жыл бұрын

    Love these. Dual main rotary systems look amazing. KA-50 is still my fav as we can fly it in DCS.

  • @ZeacorZeppelin
    @ZeacorZeppelin5 жыл бұрын

    This was a very very informative video

  • @oliverwabwire2836
    @oliverwabwire28366 жыл бұрын

    Simple timeless design that works!....if they scale it up by 2 could probably approach Chinook's lifting capacity.....for a fraction of the cost!

  • @greeneggsandsam2014

    @greeneggsandsam2014

    5 жыл бұрын

    Maybe, but the scale of project it would take to engineer such a scale-up would be massive. Almost all structural materials follow the same rule of thumb: When you double the size, you need to quadruple the strength (don't quote me on that BTW :P).

  • @kempo_95

    @kempo_95

    5 жыл бұрын

    It would get a lot bigger though. Since it has to be at least the length of the rotor so the 2 sets of blades don't hit each other.

  • @pvosoccer1585

    @pvosoccer1585

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@greeneggsandsam2014 You may be right, due to some square laws in physics and I don't remember the text book I used in college, like "University Physics" and it has a side story of scale and people of the Lilliput, all are fading in my memory. Trying some search on that story: study.com/academy/answer/in-spite-of-gulliver-s-physical-strength-he-is-passive-towards-the-lilliputians-what-aspect-of-gulliver-s-travels-does-this-represent.html

  • @Counselor77
    @Counselor775 жыл бұрын

    I got to see one of these at our local airport the other day and it had a very distinct sound.

  • @drdoolittle5724
    @drdoolittle57244 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant - explained the link at last between Fletner and Kaman that even the company did not offer. Thank you.

  • @jameschristiansson3137

    @jameschristiansson3137

    Жыл бұрын

    Company has never denied that.

  • @DT__1
    @DT__12 жыл бұрын

    Anything that comes out today as a NEW IT APPEARS ITS 100 years old.... what a brightdark “FUTURE” we live in............

  • @tomthompson7400
    @tomthompson74005 жыл бұрын

    what a beautiful machine

  • @joelmulder
    @joelmulder5 жыл бұрын

    What a beauty! I wish i could fly one of these some day...

  • @francismuiruri9064
    @francismuiruri90646 жыл бұрын

    Science at good work i love it.

  • @eartheternal3565
    @eartheternal35655 жыл бұрын

    So beautiful!

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor5 жыл бұрын

    Very clever design, I love it.

  • @anupnair4156
    @anupnair41565 жыл бұрын

    Woah!!! Amazing 🚁

  • @ashwanishahrawat4607
    @ashwanishahrawat46075 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful

  • @henry2008kim
    @henry2008kim6 жыл бұрын

    No approaching from the side with rotors turning i presume..🤔

  • @THR33SIXX3MPYR

    @THR33SIXX3MPYR

    5 жыл бұрын

    I have seen several of these in actual use, they have big letters on the side, "APPROACH FROM FRONT"

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    5 жыл бұрын

    i think its for tall people... lol dont think rotor goes so low anyway.. and you have this "approach from front" sign in this video too

  • @decespugliatorenucleare3780

    @decespugliatorenucleare3780

    5 жыл бұрын

    aka "the passenger mower"

  • @pwnmeisterage

    @pwnmeisterage

    5 жыл бұрын

    The 2:11 "unmanned drone version" developed for military use ... painted a nice dull uniform gray, no obvious safety signage, lol.

  • @pstrzel
    @pstrzel3 жыл бұрын

    One just flew over my house. What a weird sight. I thought it was my washing machine starting a spin cycle off balance.

  • @JoveJoved
    @JoveJoved Жыл бұрын

    1:10 - I'm sold.

  • @WillPhoneman
    @WillPhoneman4 жыл бұрын

    I saw one for the first time today, what a cool bird!

  • @pixamite1
    @pixamite19 ай бұрын

    Amazing!!!

  • @LectronCircuits
    @LectronCircuits5 жыл бұрын

    Awesome whirlybird. Cheers!

  • @Tomiata
    @Tomiata5 жыл бұрын

    Escellent. Yet another great chopper produced in CT!

  • @scupking
    @scupking2 жыл бұрын

    Saw a demo at a local fly in last year. I think this has to be one of the quietest aircraft.

  • @pr4wn5tar
    @pr4wn5tar5 жыл бұрын

    Nice explanation!

  • @AngelLestat2
    @AngelLestat25 жыл бұрын

    I love the design

  • @user-oi8sq6ci8j
    @user-oi8sq6ci8j5 жыл бұрын

    incredible!

  • @indigodragon7129
    @indigodragon71295 жыл бұрын

    This craft can maneuver backward's without having to dip it's nose to do so like regular helicopters have to. How neat! 😊

  • @Agislife1960
    @Agislife19605 жыл бұрын

    Glad to see they put the K-Max back into production, I never understood why they stopped in the first place.

  • @atomicskull6405

    @atomicskull6405

    3 жыл бұрын

    The market was saturated, not many customers for a helicopter that only does one thing. There's a worldwide market of about two dozen units tops for something like this. Attrition had reduced the numbers to the point they could produce a few more to replace them but the market is still about two dozen sales give or take.

  • @BunglowBill
    @BunglowBill5 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating

  • @WasatchGarandMan
    @WasatchGarandMan5 жыл бұрын

    Engineering marvel, but good Lord does it look horrid

  • @brainmind4070

    @brainmind4070

    5 жыл бұрын

    Overwatch That's an opinion, based on an aesthetic standard that is completely arbitrary. It's actually more symmetrical than a conventional helicopter. I actually think it looks pretty cool. Kinda looks like a dragonfly flapping its wings.

  • @greeneggsandsam2014

    @greeneggsandsam2014

    5 жыл бұрын

    I think it looks really cool, almost on par with the P-47 Thunderbolt in terms of so-ugly-its-pretty kind of thinking :D

  • @DrArku

    @DrArku

    5 жыл бұрын

    True, but I guess it's shaped in such a way to let the pilot have better visibility.

  • @brainmind4070

    @brainmind4070

    5 жыл бұрын

    Ace Nitro Probably works for Bell or Sikorsky. Sorry, Boeing or UTC.

  • @sixmagpies

    @sixmagpies

    5 жыл бұрын

    Oh ...have you met my wife?

  • @carlfitzpatrick5864
    @carlfitzpatrick58645 жыл бұрын

    Kaman tested the Kmax at our squadron HSL-32 back in 1992 it was fun watching it fly at the time our squadron was flying the Kaman SH-2F Sea Sprite after the navy rejected the Kmax in1992 our Squadron was decommissioned shortly after that same year.

  • @JONOVID
    @JONOVID5 жыл бұрын

    maybe Kaman Aircraft can re-design the K-Max airframe body, fuselage to put the crew cabin up the top level atop of the passengers and cargo in the level below, with big clamshell doors at the front and the tricycle landing gear inverted so a front retractable passenger ramp can be added to a new fuselage design. a lot of helicopter lifting power there! ,- just a thought.

  • @aimusoorii4484
    @aimusoorii44845 жыл бұрын

    Amazing

  • @Colemanreese08
    @Colemanreese087 жыл бұрын

    Awesome

  • @jancerny8109
    @jancerny81095 жыл бұрын

    It's an astonishing machine, if you're used to looking at tail-rotor craft. I wonder why they aren't more widely used. I'm no engineer, but it seems a high lift to weight ratio would be useful for a lot more than cargo. One could equip a version with a roomy cabin, either for an owner who wants luxury in their vehicle--imagine Marine One with intermeshing rotors--or for seating many passengers. I could see a role for short hops in between cities or airports in some places.

  • @Zothaqqua

    @Zothaqqua

    Жыл бұрын

    One of the problems is that the tilted rotor discs come low to the ground, making it hard to safely approach the aircraft.

  • @Kate-lz7jq

    @Kate-lz7jq

    9 ай бұрын

    Holiday helicopter camper

  • @JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor

    @JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor

    5 ай бұрын

    ​@@Zothaqqua that's the issue I have noticed too

  • @yangguan4070
    @yangguan40706 жыл бұрын

    Superb innovation

  • @Shadowsc133
    @Shadowsc1335 жыл бұрын

    This looks safe, reliable and modern.

  • @gabrielapetrie
    @gabrielapetrie5 жыл бұрын

    that's exciting

  • @mujeburrahman4543
    @mujeburrahman45435 жыл бұрын

    Omg...amazing.

  • @decespugliatorenucleare3780
    @decespugliatorenucleare37805 жыл бұрын

    You gotta say: that shit is pretty nimble. It almost looked like a drone, floating around in such a controlled grace.

  • @msb3235
    @msb32355 жыл бұрын

    So soothing to watch from far away but definitely scary to fly in one.

  • @dicktrolington416
    @dicktrolington4165 жыл бұрын

    Due to its high lift to size ratio would this design work well if it was battery powered?

  • @travismaenle9416
    @travismaenle94165 жыл бұрын

    How does it turn? Also, how does it change direction?

  • @c4pt1n54no
    @c4pt1n54no5 жыл бұрын

    When you mentioned the 3 d's all I could picture was a K max hovering inverted.

  • @antonioaraujo7684
    @antonioaraujo76846 жыл бұрын

    sincronia perfeita... dá até medo...parece que vão bater a qualquer momento!

  • @Kate-lz7jq
    @Kate-lz7jq9 ай бұрын

    Really elegant machine, so little parts!

  • @jeremylakenes6859
    @jeremylakenes6859 Жыл бұрын

    Is the rotor head rigid?

  • @reddaB
    @reddaB5 жыл бұрын

    Is this more dangerous to get out of than a normal helicopter? Because of the blades spinning lower and closer to the floor? Do you have to wait for the blades to stop to exit the craft? Unlike a normal helicopter?

  • @TheKruze88
    @TheKruze885 жыл бұрын

    !1:17 "immigrated to the us" bwhahahah more like "operation paperclip"

  • @tissuepaper9962

    @tissuepaper9962

    5 жыл бұрын

    The narrator actually said "emigrated", not "immigrated". Two different words there.

  • @claudbenz4232

    @claudbenz4232

    5 жыл бұрын

    TissuePaper what's the difference between these 2 words?

  • @Backyard_Brouhaha

    @Backyard_Brouhaha

    5 жыл бұрын

    george emigrate is to LEAVE a country. Immigrate is to ENTER a country. So, he emigrated from Germany, and immigrated into the US. History nerds: Except not cuz paperclip

  • @JonatasAdoM
    @JonatasAdoM5 жыл бұрын

    I've never heard of it before!

  • @cjeam9199
    @cjeam91995 жыл бұрын

    First time I saw one of these it was a video that had a clip filmed from the side of it spinning up and you couldn’t see that it had two rotors, I was so completely confused until later on when the thing turned to face he camera.

  • @Thebadassowl
    @Thebadassowl5 жыл бұрын

    Oh my god that's fucking trippy

  • @draccoman2812
    @draccoman28123 жыл бұрын

    The perfect combination of thrust and anxiety

  • @FedericoLucchi
    @FedericoLucchi5 жыл бұрын

    Impressive! I wonder how it rotates on itself since it doesn't have a tail rotor and keeps the two rotors at identical speed...

  • @AINvideo

    @AINvideo

    5 жыл бұрын

    There are control surfaces on the rotor blades, like ailerons. Thanks for watching!

  • @100PercentJoseph
    @100PercentJoseph5 жыл бұрын

    How does it yaw exactly?

  • @iorfidaskye
    @iorfidaskye5 жыл бұрын

    What's the autorotation specs?

  • @turboboy1983
    @turboboy19835 жыл бұрын

    So, what is the benefit of a tail rotor? Isn’t that what causes most helicopter crashes. How come every helo doesn’t have this configuration or the double stacked version?

  • @sebamuniz792
    @sebamuniz7925 жыл бұрын

    Frank has another hidden talent

  • @shinigami117s8
    @shinigami117s85 жыл бұрын

    So why isn’t it more popular ??

  • @ImNotADeeJay
    @ImNotADeeJay5 жыл бұрын

    Still trying to figure out how do the blades manage to not hit each other

  • @BuffiestFluff

    @BuffiestFluff

    5 жыл бұрын

    They're driven by the same motor, so what is essentially 2 timing belts keeps their rotations the same, and as long as they're offset slightly, the belts/engine can keep them in their own individual spin, which does not intersect with the other blade.

  • @haassteambraker9959

    @haassteambraker9959

    5 жыл бұрын

    The gearing keeps them synchronized. If they stopped being synchronized you'd have much bigger problems.

  • @HerezCheez

    @HerezCheez

    5 жыл бұрын

    Its the similar mechanic how bullets dont hit the blades in world war 2 helicopter.

  • @laytonpratt

    @laytonpratt

    5 жыл бұрын

    Just Me but when it turns one slows down

  • @jaysoni5
    @jaysoni55 жыл бұрын

    I can understand how oppositely moving rotors eliminate the need for tail rotor. But how do these two twin rotors, moving in opposite directions, create the lift? Shouldn't they nullify each other's effect in vertical movement too?

  • @jaysoni5

    @jaysoni5

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Positive Anion Thanks. Due to your answer, I researched and found out today that helicopter's lift is also due to angle of attack. All this while I was under the impression that is the direction of the rotation that operates it.

  • @gv9750
    @gv97505 жыл бұрын

    I IDENTIFY AS AN ORANGE K-MAX HELICOPTER !

  • @YurkerYT
    @YurkerYT5 жыл бұрын

    Can someone explain hot the Heli turns? Usually is by differential thrust, but here if one of the blades spins faster it will collide against the other.

  • @snonsig2688

    @snonsig2688

    4 жыл бұрын

    just like any other heli. by turning the rotorblades

  • @denisekernan3322
    @denisekernan33225 жыл бұрын

    TWIN BLADE REPORTING!

  • @slightlyobeserat5781
    @slightlyobeserat57815 жыл бұрын

    it scares me looking at it but it’s also really cool

  • @aibpresto
    @aibpresto5 жыл бұрын

    Damn that is one sexy helicopter

  • @ojcubz
    @ojcubz5 жыл бұрын

    I'm no engineer but do that blades go from one gear? I'd assume it would be hell to keep those insync otherwise

  • @thejafuu5001

    @thejafuu5001

    5 жыл бұрын

    correct, there is only one motor and the rotors are geared together.

  • @eprn1n2
    @eprn1n2 Жыл бұрын

    It’s amazing how much pilot skill is involved in keeping both rotors from hitting each other.

  • @aerialkerala

    @aerialkerala

    Жыл бұрын

    No piloting skills are required for keeping the rotors from hitting each other as they are connected and aligned internally with gears.

  • @eprn1n2

    @eprn1n2

    Жыл бұрын

    @@aerialkerala Without the skill of the pilots the rotors woud come in contact with each other. Very skilfull

  • @aerialkerala

    @aerialkerala

    Жыл бұрын

    @@eprn1n2 Please see this video and you'll get it: kzread.info/dash/bejne/iq5h1tmhldiuqMY.html

  • @eprn1n2

    @eprn1n2

    Жыл бұрын

    @@aerialkerala Sorry Aerial. Just joking.

  • @sovjetcrab3645
    @sovjetcrab36455 жыл бұрын

    Well that looks safe

  • @jacksrandomadventures2769
    @jacksrandomadventures27695 жыл бұрын

    yaay.. go helicopter

  • @theholydoge8731
    @theholydoge87315 жыл бұрын

    This is like the coolest shit ever

  • @sonoftatanzambe248
    @sonoftatanzambe2485 жыл бұрын

    Waouh!

  • @natewhitfield4112
    @natewhitfield41123 жыл бұрын

    How do you stop turbulence from blowing one of the rotors off balance?

  • @waffles4622

    @waffles4622

    2 жыл бұрын

    The rotors use a gearbox so this makes them physically impossible for them to hit each other.

  • @Rowanbows
    @Rowanbows4 жыл бұрын

    german invention - we nailed it again :)

  • @pepperidgefarmremembers6350
    @pepperidgefarmremembers63509 ай бұрын

    WOOO IM HAVING ONE OF THESE LAND AT MY HIGHSCHOOL I LOVE LIVING NEAR KAMAN COMPOSITES

  • @MtsHumming
    @MtsHumming5 жыл бұрын

    Nepal could use some drone version, to lift supplies to hill top village if road is washed out by landslides.

  • @seemeslegit3765

    @seemeslegit3765

    5 жыл бұрын

    nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world but. good idea

  • @southpawlibranine3511

    @southpawlibranine3511

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@seemeslegit3765 just because Nepal is poor doesn't mean the government can't afford to buy this. Or even the people. There are a lot of filthy rich people in Nepal too.

  • @seemeslegit3765

    @seemeslegit3765

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@southpawlibranine3511 The rich people don't give a shit about the poor, and after all the earquakes there in the past the tourist industry is struggling. without a magic fairy conjuring up some money the can't afford it

  • @southpawlibranine3511

    @southpawlibranine3511

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@seemeslegit3765 do you know all the Rich people personally. Stop generalising. And by the way the tourism industry last year had the most amount of visitors in the whole history of Nepal visit. Only two years after the quake. So stop making up crap without looking at the hard facts to suit your barely there argument. Iam fortunate enough to be a Nepali who comes from considerable wealth and my family has done a lot for the poor and so has countless other rich people. What have you done?

  • @southpawlibranine3511

    @southpawlibranine3511

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@seemeslegit3765 there's is currently a total of five new luxury hotels being built in the capital city alone. Not to mention a 300 million dollar casino that opened in another city. I wouldnt consider that struggling to attract tourists. I guess the Hilton, Sheraton and other hoteliers are wasting their money. I know the owner of the Hilton personally.

  • @AudiTech26
    @AudiTech265 жыл бұрын

    Are the blades angled for stability?

  • @thejafuu5001

    @thejafuu5001

    5 жыл бұрын

    Pretty sure they are angled just so they dont hit each other :)

  • @youcancode6988
    @youcancode69884 жыл бұрын

    I like this narrator

  • @alexabadi7458
    @alexabadi7458Ай бұрын

    I hope they have find a solution for the servos failures.

  • @markfox1545
    @markfox15455 жыл бұрын

    And when a birdstrike or rotor failure causes the rotors to clash and there is no lift so no autorotation...?

  • @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    5 жыл бұрын

    A birdstrike wouldn't cause them to clash because they're geared together.

  • @skycorrigan6511
    @skycorrigan651111 ай бұрын

    I've heard these synchropter's are noticeably more quiet than traditional helicopters. Is that marginally true?

  • @abitofapickle6255
    @abitofapickle62556 жыл бұрын

    This thing can lift my jeep

  • @fakshen1973
    @fakshen19735 жыл бұрын

    The shape reminds me of The Great Gazoo from Flintstones/Jetsons.

  • @GorillaZillas
    @GorillaZillas5 жыл бұрын

    Does the off angle of the rotors waste any of the lift? That's the first thing I thought when I saw it.......

  • @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    5 жыл бұрын

    Probably, but it's offset by the lack of a tail rotor.

  • @GorillaZillas

    @GorillaZillas

    5 жыл бұрын

    Indeed, might be some Aerodynamic cleverness going on too, with the Converging airstreams converge and deflect each other to directly down rather than exhausting the airstreams at angles....

  • @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    @davidbergaragonzalez5653

    5 жыл бұрын

    Perhaps.

  • @brainmind4070
    @brainmind40705 жыл бұрын

    Kinda looks like a dragonfly flapping its wings.

  • @thanosmadtitan7475
    @thanosmadtitan74753 жыл бұрын

    I don't know it's strange or coincidence or what, after watching this video for few seconds, I was thinking about german engineering during ww2, and then there is mention of the German invention!