Charlie Rose talks with Charlie Rose with Justice Scalia in the room.

@j.flux87

3 жыл бұрын

😂

Why does Charlie Rose keep interrupting him?

@codnba136

6 жыл бұрын

because he is so excited^^ he can't keep himself together.

@aubreyroche5080

5 жыл бұрын

Because Charlie despises Justice Antoin's adherence to the Written Constitution....

@_swagmeister

4 жыл бұрын

because he's so good at his job that he gets to break the rules

@anthonyr587

3 жыл бұрын

I was just typing and saw the same thing, jesus, let the man speak!!

@tropicten

3 жыл бұрын

It should have nothing to do with Rose’s political beliefs. It’s just bad interviewing. I never was a Scalia fan. But I am very interested in what he was trying to say.

"A man who has made no enemies is probably not a good man" - Scalia

Charlie Rose doesn't really care about his interview subjects ... he simply wants to hear himself.

@someonenew439

2 жыл бұрын

Very true. He kept interrupting.

My word. Charlie Rose is one of those annoying interviewers who waits until a person starts to answer a question and then starts talking again - constantly talking over the person who's trying to answer a question.

@bk2524

5 жыл бұрын

I'm so glad this was noticed. I just started to yell "Stop Interrupting the man!!"

@pattijesinoski1958

4 жыл бұрын

What do you expect as the approved mouthpiece of the bilderberg group?

@integralmath

3 жыл бұрын

@@brianreardon7700 why does lately matter? Rose hasn't interviewed anyone lately considering he got very publicly fired for sexual misconduct. But if it helps ease your mind, I've interviewed more people than he has because I was a cop for quite a few years. =^_^= If you have any other stupid questions, do feel free to pose them.

@integralmath

3 жыл бұрын

@@brianreardon7700 you were wise to have deleted your ill-considered and wholly unlettered attempt at a zinger.

Charlie Rose is way out of his league here. Scalia is a legal genius and a man of great dignity.He is missed.

@johnmoffett1952

3 жыл бұрын

Scalia was a beast he layed it down consistently and correctly.

@AtomicMushroomz

Жыл бұрын

@@johnmoffett1952 No he didn't

What a huge loss our country has endured.

@ThePoreproductions

7 жыл бұрын

RIP Justic Scalia.

@wranglerspace3658

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThePoreproductions and now RBG

"A man who has made no enemies is probably not a very good man." Absolutely true!

This is unwatchable. Was Charlie Rose high on something?

W the actual F!? What is wrong with this guy? Why is he interrupting EACH AND EVERY word that comes out of the mouth of Scalia? I'm not American. Isn't this guys supposed to be a famous journalist or something? That's the worst kind of interview one can ever conduct, especially interviewing someone such as Scalia.

@chaosgyro

3 жыл бұрын

He was made famous by fellow idealogues in the media for interrupting their political opponents so no counter arguments were able to be properly articulated.

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

It's more or less the same type of badgering of witnesses you hear in Congressional hearings, in which the questioner is nowhere near as interested in hearing what the witness has to say than in what the _questioner_ has to say. IOW, preening for the cameras. I've rarely heard a TV journalist who wasn't in love with the sound of their own voice.

I don't get why Charlie Rose is laughing like he's sitting with a comedian. The guy appears to just be explaining some things and Rose is cracking up like there's punchlines

@sethfarmer590

5 жыл бұрын

Well Scalia was pretty funny.

@politics443

Жыл бұрын

Because charlie does not respect scalia, he despises him.

@buddrossi6451

10 ай бұрын

@@politics443You obviously did not even watch the damned video. He said at the end, “A great American, I loved him.”

Scalia was a beast he layed it down consistently and correctly.

"I like to figure out where the truth lies." That is what we should all aim for. The relentless pursuit of truth.

@josh18230

2 жыл бұрын

for the left, there is no truth. They hate the concept because it blocks the insertion of nonsense ideology and thus the lock end of absolute power.

Thank you Mr Justice Sceilla for standing, a honorable Man Sir, We the people know, We take great honor in shining the light on THE TRUTH! If I as you ,were/are must be a marytr and 'out casted ' for light and truth, I am deeply honored and empowered

I hate blowing smoke, but Justice Scalia was one of the best persons whom ever lived. I wish I knew about him growing up.

Why is Charlie Rose talking more than the person he's supposed to be interviewing

“The rules of the FAA require that your baggage [should] BE under the seat.”

@vesk4000

10 ай бұрын

Thanks so much! I'm not a native speaker, so I was wondering what was wrong with the sentence since it didn't sound off to me.

The interviewer is infuriating

His legal views were NOT out of the main stream. Charlie is a liar. Charlie's view of main stream seems to think it's ok for a creepy old man to walk around young girls naked.

@dondark6423

3 жыл бұрын

How many times does the interviewer interrupt the Justice? Charlie Rose was not hired by PBS or by CBS for his journalistic skills. He was hired for his agreement to slant the news in a certain direction.

Can someone explain to me the baggage is under the seat thing?

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

To say the baggage "is" under the seat implies that the baggage is already under the seat, as opposed to being required to be _placed_ under the seat.

omg I couldn't do this interview every time Scalia was going to answer him boom interrupt he would shut up wait for Scalia to talk again and boom another interruption is Charlie rose retired yet what a shame

Charlie Rose, let him finish, and you've really been exposing yourself as someone who doesn't really know much. I like interviewers to be able to do well on jeopardy in many categories. I know your over the hill, made your money, and half a life of your own, but do a little research. Claiming Hillary lying as a pretty big charge to Marco Rubio; open a newspaper. Don't look upon us west of the Hudson with contempt.

@bluestrapsify

6 жыл бұрын

He literaly HAS been exposing himself

Precious.

The greatest judge I never knew. #RIP to #Auer greatest legal mind. Nice to see Charlie Rose endorsing Trump. He's the best we got. Kant deal with them anymore

It really helps to remember how people actually lived when they were my age. Because large, college students are NOT the norm.

Just let a guy speak.

The guy doesn't let him finish a sentence!

Charlie asks the question, answers it and laughs at his own answer 🙄🙄🙄🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️

@shahaman5694

Жыл бұрын

Yes, that’s true. That’s a weird behavior 😅

I really remember that Depression photograph. So I don't want to risk "spending money on someone who didn't do anything."

Charlie is trying to prove he can overpower Scalia. What a tool! Scalia should’ve called out on Charlie for his stupid interruptions

Cause he was an originalistic brute with a slick demeanor

Justice Scalia was, without a doubt, the last living line of defense for our Constitution and our "rights". He cannot be replaced with anyone of equal caliber, IMHO.

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

His legacy is that many jurists coming out of our most prestigious law schools now respect originalism as a judicial philosophy; they're just not as _consistent_ with applying it as Scalia was. What cracks me up is the lead-in to this interview -- "outside the mainstream." Maybe after decades of Warren-inspired evolutionists on the bench it does seem "out of the mainstream;" but originalism WAS the mainstream for practically the entire history of the Supreme Court, until the Warren Court -- or possibly before that, when FDR threatened to pack the court and by doing so managed to extract evolutionist concessions out of SCOTUS for his New Deal programs. That got the ball rolling, but it was the Warren Court which put evolutionism on steroids. All Scalia did really was start to tip the scales back to where judicial review was prior to this sudden lurch toward liberal "living Constitution" devotion. In that way he did a great service by giving average lay people an understanding of what SCOTUS's responsibility truly is -- as justices calling balls and strikes and not as an activist pseudo-legislature.

Scalia has a very similar voice to Mel Blanc, just not quite as smoky. I bet he was able to do a spot on Bugs Bunny impression.

I don't understand... the word "baggage" should be followed by the singular "is"... what's the grammatical error there?

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

To say the baggage "is" under the seat implies that the baggage is already under the seat, as opposed to being required _to be placed_ under the seat.

Hmm do TV presenters are actually capable of NOT interrupting the one they interview every single minute

Scalia was the GOAT

Quite different than the interview with RBG. Probably because Scalia is a Conservative

Creepy Charlie Rose! I love listening to Antonin Scalia, but not when Rose is in the same zip code.

I’ve got to say, I had fundamental disagreements with him but when he really made The Flintstones for me. Yabba dabba do!

I dont get the "baggage under the seat" part. hahaha

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

To say the baggage "is" under the seat implies that the baggage is already under the seat, as opposed to being required to be _placed_ under the seat.

“what a great interview” ‘thank you’ pff these people.

Why is a judge giving an interview?

I assume people are guessing what I'm saying. So more clarification.

Vocabulary isn't an issue of syntax exactly...

This man was an intellectual giant

@dassa0069

2 жыл бұрын

Are you claiming your own intellectual prowess? Pure vanity.

@GroovyMurdock

10 ай бұрын

But he used his personal religious beliefs to influence his rulings.

SCALIA. WAS. SO. SMART.

Charlie rose is probably home right now sitting in front of a mirror talking to himself

tempestuous, strong, sometimes wrong, sometimes right, but he was a man.

Gosh stop interrupting him

Overturn whatever court case. Because people could have made the same mistake in the future.

"Outside the mainstream" LOL

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

Right? There was a time when originalism WAS the mainstream, which shows how far afield Constitutional interpretation has gone since 1937.

"I like to see him out of his bathrobe."

You can tell Scalia doesn’t care for Charlie Rose

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

He's in good company.

Does Charlie Rose ever not interview Charlie Rose? And, if so, can he ever finish an answer before asking a question. What a narcissist.

Awful interviewer. Let the man talk fool!

Charlie Rose, the schill of a "journalist" who later tried to get McEnroe to apologize for saying Serena would be destroyed by Male Tennis players.

Good damn STOP interupting

If only I could have met him and called him to Islam.

@krispy8021

5 жыл бұрын

Diane Stetson never.

will i am barr

Asking questions but isn’t interested in the answers, so annoying

Charlie Rose's ego got more and more inflated as years went by. He started to lose it and just make the interviews more and more about his theatrics and about himself rather than about his interviewees. In talking to people of the stature of justice Scalia, he should not have given the impression that he is talking to an equal. He should have been humble and modest and let his subject talk.

Charlie Rose is absolutely Terrible. Cartoonishly bad at interviewing.

Women are much better interviewers. This guy couldn't help but interrupt every couple of seconds.

Questionable take on “baggage” usage

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

To say the baggage "is" under the seat implies that the baggage is already under the seat, as opposed to being required to be _placed_ under the seat. It would be more correct to say FAA regulations require personal items _to be placed_ under the seat.

Worst Supreme Court ever

So glad Charlie Rose is gone. Obnoxious.

Charlie Rose's goal is not for us to hear from his interview subject. His goal is for us to hear from him. Pathetic ...

Yeah I bet they just loved him.

I couldn't finish the interview because of how much Charlie Rose annoyingly interrupts Scalia and talks over him. Terrible interviewer.

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

Nawww, it was a _wonderful_ interview. Rose's lackeys said so! Didn't you hear? No, I guess you couldn't hear coz he was talking over his colleagues too.

Charlie Rose has been disgraced....the interruptions here are telling of bias

Two of the smarmiest people ever.

Terrible interviewer. Let the great man speak please.

i will say this about him, we never had to guess what he truly felt unlike the other 99 % of politicians . RIP but i am glad you're not a judge anymore

@GElvis001

8 жыл бұрын

He wasn't a politician... He was a judge.

@lindat5784

8 жыл бұрын

+greg goodale and you think there is a difference? you do know judges are appointed right??

@Fargo20011

8 жыл бұрын

+Linda T judges don't have to campaign like politicians do

@GElvis001

8 жыл бұрын

Linda T Yes... I do know that, well federal ones anyway... Politicians are typically elected in our country. But I will concede your point... Too many judges today, will rule based on their own personal policy beliefs or preferences rather than interpret based on the text of the law and its original intent (despite what they believe politically). These judges are like politicians and what's worse, they weren't elected and have a lifetime appointment. That is why Scalia was such a giant... He put the text of the law above his own personal political beliefs. That is why we need more judges like him, and like Alito, and like Thomas.

@lindat5784

8 жыл бұрын

+Jack Morris oh don't you believe they don't campaign. not to us, but they do to people with power

This is unwatchable. Was Charlie Rose high on something?

@briane173

8 ай бұрын

Yes. Himself.