Jurassic Park and Lost World. That's all we needed. Should have stopped there.

@ilyassebenana3824

13 күн бұрын

Hell nah, the lost world was trash

@msscott22

12 күн бұрын

@@ilyassebenana3824 Compared to the original, yea. Compared to the other sequels? Nah.

@CodyCR

10 күн бұрын

@@ilyassebenana3824Nah, The Lost World is great. Obviously not as amazing as the original. Still some Spielberg greatness in it.

@godzillabebravethetrexretu1381

4 күн бұрын

Jurassic World should have been the last one

i think it should have only been just the original trilogy. while the original is the best, the lost world is my favorite.

WE NEED the next one to be rated R. PLEASE MAKE IT RATED R

Im going to make a real Jurassic park series true to the original book, filled with horror and gore. 2030.

@switchmasterstopmotions

11 күн бұрын

Keep me up to date with it 😊👍

Being 100% honest here... Jurassic Park was a fantastic movie, with massive flaws that didn't age well. For example There are two different T-rex designs in that movie, one for the animatronic, one for the CG and they don't actually look the same so it's a little jarring to see the t-rex transform between scenes. The reason people hold it in such high regard is because there are sequels. Let's say only the first movie existed? 95% of the fanbase and community wouldn't exist either, and Jurrasic Park would be a random no-name movie that included Dinosaurs by this point. One of those films that was at one point big but got overshadowed by later productions, and was niche in its approach to begin with so had a hard time reaching a wider audience. Whenever you talk to the modern Jurassic Park community it's almost never the first movie that got them into the franchise. For most people it's the Lost World, or Jurassic Park III. I have multiple friends who have only watched Jurassic World and that's what their experience of the franchise is. In fact I know someone who specifically states that the reason she'll never watch Jurassic Park I, II, or III is because the community of those movies are "Elitist pricks with a stick shoved so far up their ass that they don't know the difference between a Dilophosaurus and a Monolophosaurus but will try to lecture you on them anyway" I'm not even sure I'd call Jurassic park the best of the movies anymore tbh. Like thinking about that Movie in Hindsight I can only really remember the introduction of the Brachiosaurus, The T-rex chasing the Car, the Velociraptors, and the Final segment clearly. And whenever I look back at the movie it's basically "A movie about dinosaurs eating people" and that's pretty much it. In terms of world building it presents a really fun and interesting world, but doesn't explore it, the movie hyper focuses on one location, and that isolated element helps what the movie does good, but as time has gone on has become a part of the negative side of the movie. In essence Jurassic Park is a good movie, but it aged terribly such as when it had issues with continuity where in one scene the car door is open during the T-rex attack, then the next scene it's closed. And even the T-rex looked notably different between scenes. If I were to rank The Jurassic Park/World video Media I've seen it'd look like this: S: Chaos Theory > Battle at Big Rock A: Camp Cretaceous > Jurassic Park: The Lost World B: Jurassic Park III > Jurassic World > Jurassic Park Novel > Jurassic Park: The Lost World Novel C: Jurassic Park > Jurassic World: Dominion Prologue D: Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom > Lego Jurassic Park/World Media F: Jurassic World: Dominion And it's important to state that if we're talking about Jurassic Park on Release, within the cultural context of its release I'd put it in A tier, or bottom of S Tier. But at this stage? It's important to acknowledge that the movie was important to cinematic history, and to the development of recent generations, But it's not a 'good' movie by modern standards. I started with Jurassic Park, but I'm also Fully aware that the reason most people think it's amazing is because of rose tinted nostalgia glasses Especially since so many aspects of the movie do not hold up to the standard expected of modern movies, or even at the time. But the film culture was different on its release and at the time it was amazing within that context, but that culture has changed now, and the context that Jurassic Park originally existed in doesn't persist anymore. Generally movies need more content to them now, and the fans of Jurassic Park have updated the franchise successfully with Camp Cretaceous and Chaos Theory which bring back a lot of the atmosphere from the original movies, but updated to current viewing culture. I'd say Jurassic World is better than Jurassic Park, but only because it actually builds on Jurassic Park, and explores the world and lore in a much greater degree while having a theme and message which makes sense inside the context of the Jurassic Franchise, and also outside of it. The biggest complaint I've heard anyone make about Jurassic World is about the CG, and if that's the only thing people can really complain about then that speaks for itself. Other issues the movie has are mainly franchise issues, aka issues that afflict the franchise as a whole rather than the individual movies. Jurassic Park definitively has better characters than Jurassic World, but it's also important to note that Jurassic World focuses on the world of the setting, where Jurassic Park focuses on the characters in the setting. So it's expected for a movie to do better at the thing it focuses on. However the Jurassic World franchise proceeds to build those characters up through the course of the movies where Jurassic Park drops them nearly immediately.

Me when the book had a sequel 💀

So many fake fans glad they made more after Jurassic Park

im fine with saying the world trilogy sucks but saying lost world and even to an extent 3 shouldnt exist is criminal and even world has some unique ideas that couldve been made better i think if they didnt go directly from failed idea of an overly ambitious rich man to massive theme park and instead kept world as a smaller park less akin to disney world and more as a zoo wouldve been so much scarier and better and the sequels inability to create any real horror is a masssive dissapointment. i think the scope and scale of the park destroy the more compact and claustrophobic feel of being stuck on an island with dinosaurs and i think thats why camp cretacious gets so much praise since it brings back the feel of lost world etc of exploring abandoned places

I'd be down with a sequel if there was zero human characters. Just dinosaurs fucking around doing dinosaurs shit. They do dinosaurs well we don't need human characters. And if you have to have them give them no dialogue and they just get eaten.

Dominion did kinda suck

@TotallynotaPrianhacompy

13 күн бұрын

Kinda... It was three movies in 1