I would go to law school again if Judge NAP was the prof in each class.

@dks13827

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed. Question: When I see all of the law school grads on tv ( politicians and tv folks ), do they give law degrees to just any dummy who pays ? Serious question.

@linkedaccountssuck

3 жыл бұрын

@@dks13827 Yes! It's pretty sad.

@vhawk1951kl

3 жыл бұрын

@@dks13827Of exactly how many "law school grads" have you experience that you may say "All"? "All" is how many and how many can you name? it is often wisest to avoid universals - for screamingly obvious reasons readily apparent even to infants and drunken one-eyed donkeys. Plainly you have no degree, for those with degrees generally have the wisdom to avoid universals. Some universities award honorary degrees for one or another reason, but honorary degrees are not regarded as any evidence of particular learning. Who do you suggest has no more than an honorary degree?

@Aasn9

5 ай бұрын

I’m in law school and I introduced them to him)

Trump should put Judge Nap on the SCOTUS.

@ebt1117

5 жыл бұрын

Trump is a puppet of Israel and the warmongers and banksters. Why would he choose someone good?

@tracischeelk29

5 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/apdkks9tm6bWZLg.html Check out this, people. Was Kavenaugh part of the Jew-orchestrated Charade? Jew Sabotage of Kavenaugh with Kavenaugh playing two rolls? Kavenaugh Constitutional? Really? What does Judge Napoliano have to say? kzread.info/dash/bejne/nnhr09yBZNLIY7w.html short kzread.info/dash/bejne/Y6mItJWqfrqdYNo.html full Napoliana

@jsallerson

5 жыл бұрын

Trump would never put Nap on the SCOTUS. Nap is a threat to trump.

@h.skiprobinson7668

4 жыл бұрын

Still down the proverbial rabbit hole, I see. He loves Wikileaks- candidate Trump. Let's prosecute the bastard, President Trump. Trump apparently must say enough things to get the masses to believe him. An indication of a good politician, not necessarily a good statesman. I could go into his MO as a real estate developer and how he tried to burn many of this contractors and how many court battles he makes them wage against him but you should just talk to the many contractors he has taken advantage of in the communities where his projects are. To many stories to tell in a youtube comment section.

*When the 4th Amendment is violated, a case can be made that the 1st, 3rd, and 5th Amendments are simultaneously violated. Breaching one part of the Constitution has a domino effect.*

@attilaevil

3 жыл бұрын

Why doesn't anyone research the fact that the constitution is NO MORE. It was declared obsolete by supreme court judges and auctioned off at Christie's ??? This is not hidden, you simply google the data.

@attilaevil

3 жыл бұрын

@Liberty is not free You are very naive. All of your rights mean absolutely NOTHING when you have been outsmarted by organizations that are thousands of years old and got their wisdom from even older, more ancient divisions of extreme sophistication. Why is it that no good people are in power positions, ever ??? Your rights are as imaginary as fairytales. None of your rights has prevented the ancient rulership of death. You are a subject and that is all. Your fantasy is the HOPIUM SUBSTANCE OF CONTROL. THE NEVER ENDING STORY. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ARE RIGHT. WE DON'T LIVE IN THAT WORLD. THIS IS NOT YOUR WORLD. YOU MAY NEVER FIGURE IT OUT.

That may be the best talk he has ever given, and he always gives great talks.

@fsmoura

5 жыл бұрын

Outstanding indeed; a true giant of liberty.

SUCH a great lecture, I teach the constitution to college students and the stuff he is talking about are completely alien to them, and its my goal to correct that by giving all the facts, not just the ones their other left wing professors want them to know.

@attilaevil

3 жыл бұрын

You can become very smart, but that doesn't help inside the court room.

@christopherbic7688

2 жыл бұрын

Carry On

Judge Napolitano is so great!

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

He just dissed our founders and our founding and declared that our hearts are the true progenitor of our rights and you call him great? he also twisted a noble story into a despicable act of tyranny. He did not represent accurately what truly happened or why to the Mayor. They deliberately exonerated the Mayor., they did not try to "lynch" him.

@robertrenk7074

5 жыл бұрын

Crystal Giddens He said our humanity is where our rights come from and not the government. He didn’t say rights came from our hearts. Are the stories founders correct or false? Did he make a mistake? If so please share facts.

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Robert Renk i did't say the story was incorrect i said he read it wrong. they did what they did for the reasons I gave not the reasons he gave. our rights come from God.

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Bran Mak Morn Very good point, neither of us were there. How, if you are not there, can you interpret what happened? You can impugn good motives or bad motives. The way the story is told even with his spin, they obviously made no effort to convict the man and instead made every effort to insure the man was exonerated. Throw a celebration for him, declare him a hero, then charge him for a crime that resulted from his heroic deed, then have the same folks who just celebrated his heroism try him? Talk about "prejudicing the jury!" That is how I read it. So who is the dumb fuck now? Besides, not charging him leaves the possibility of him being charged some day down the road perhaps when he is not so popular. Regardless, they obviously did him a big favor! Ya dumb fuck!

@robertrenk7074

5 жыл бұрын

Crystal Giddens "He dissed our founders and our founding and declared that our hearts are the true progenitor of our rights and you call him great?" That's what you wrote. Notice you didn't quote him as saying our rights come from god or our humanity, you say that he declared our rights come from our heart. Where exactly in this video did he say they come from the heart? Why mislead people with lies when he said no such thing?

Rights are an application of the Principle of Reciprocity to the character of a being, as apposed to just specific actions taken. This means that individuals have rights insofar as they're willing to respect the lives and liberties of others. As such, rights cannot be externally granted or revoked, only respected or infringed.

@scottbieser

3 жыл бұрын

Well said.

@Silverbugle2005

3 жыл бұрын

Same here... very well said!

@TinyGiantLifeStyle

3 жыл бұрын

And yet rights are controlled at gun point daily.

@Kimani_White

3 жыл бұрын

@@TinyGiantLifeStyle Correction: Rights are *_violated_* at gunpoint daily.

@dr.lyleevans6915

3 жыл бұрын

@@TinyGiantLifeStyle They likely wouldn’t be, had most of our rights that allowed us to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government growing its power to levels in which the people can no longer effectively fight back not been intentionally and strategically removed. By the way, I have successfully executed multiple 1983 actions (42 US Code 1983; Civil Rights Violation Under Color of Law) on local law enforcement where I live, as well as one 1985. Organized and implemented a civilian oversight committee as well. They were getting so out of hand it began to resemble something out of 1930’s USSR

Jury Nullification solves many of these problems that laws are unable to address...but no judge, nor prosecutor is ever going to let that be known!

@dr.lyleevans6915

3 жыл бұрын

As a matter of fact, simply insinuating that you are aware of the principle will immediately get you booted from jury selection. Jury nullification isn’t actually a law in and of itself; it is more a proxy. JN is the logical result of two separate laws. Jurors can choose whichever verdict they deem correct, and cannot be punished for their choice. Therefore any given juror has a legal right to declare a defendant innocent, even if the juror suspects them guilty (and vice versa)

Thanks that there is a Mises Institute ( if the SPLC hates it, then generally speaking, I’m for it) and thanks that there is judge Napolitano.

Thank you for these videos! Judge Napolitano, Your Honor, you are an irreplaceable advocate for the constitution and liberty. Your talks will be shared with my kids. You truly are a crucial asset to their education.

Natural law of each person is duty of right of self-defense & protect his family using weapon like legal firearm from armed intruders, instead of he needs help from the Gov’t.

This presentation is incredible!!

Another extraordinary presentation from Judge Nap.

@vhawk1951kl

3 жыл бұрын

But neither calm nor impartial

I was not expecting that ending, but it was fantastic, just like Judge Napolitano always is

@marino2duper

5 жыл бұрын

What about that ending did you like ?

Amazing lecture!

Bravo. The judge is a scholar and a teacher.

Napolitano is a true Anarchist and the only Judge I am aware of that I would agree with his legitimate examination and ruling of Natural Law.

This needs 300,000 million views,

This is a wonderful reminder of the original intent of our founders. Judge Nap points his finger at the Natural Law, personal rights to live and let live, & to do no harm, but does not get into the details of how to enforce a culture formed with Natural Law as it's ideal. Over long periods of time, many things that we do today will have bad consequences later on. Example, my former neighbor buries toxic chemicals in his backyard which does not affect me at the time but now, 20 years later when my neighbor is dead, my grandkids are poisoned with something oozing out of the ground next to my fence line. What rights do I have if the non-aggression principle is applied? This is how government laws and regulations get started. So we pass all kinds of laws to stop a person from ever endangering another person through ignorance. I think it's a lie to mention the libertarian idea, Non-Aggression Principle (NAP), without qualifying it with the idea of TIME. The ideal government is the eternal guarantor of God-given rights and equal justice under the law. Eternity is a long time, which is why we need GOD!

Hello, Mises Institute My name is Gabriel Berno, I’m 18 and I’m from São Paulo - Brazil. I have been watching your videos for a long time and I love it, it is very important to keep spreading information! I hope that you guys keep doing your great job. So, as you may know, Brazil has been going through tough times: lots of corrupt politicians, more than 60.000 murders per year, populists and comunists politicians trying to take the power, etc. In 2010 one idea popped up: normal people from the society decided to get together and form a party. It took a long time to go over the extremely heavy burocracy and to actually get the party ready for the elections. The name is NOVO, it means New. Why? NOVO is a party that doesn’t uses public money for its campaigns, just the money provided by people that agrees with its ideology. Novo is liberal, it thinks that without economic freedom there is no economic growth. Novo fights against privilegies, abusive politicians and stands for all kinds of freedom. But, why am I texting you? Guys, I really need your help on divulgating it so that we can crowd fund money and elect one president that may help our people get out of the misery. Research about it, so that you can see that it is a honest party, that has really good intentions and qualified people working on it. Please, we realy need your help. Brazil can’t take so bad politics anymore. This is the link of the crowd funding: joaoamoedo.com.br/contribua/ Thanks for the attention, Gabriel Berno.

The Virginia Plan had the word National 13 times - Supreme 5 times - we where left with supreme used twice- National zero - it took the framers two moth to get rid of the word National - why is our union addicted to the word National - the answer consolidation of power !

superb. more judge nap please!

One of CS Lewis best, but least read, books 'The Abolition of Man', advocates a Natural Law tradition from Plato onwards, without reference to God, which would have been acceptable to Confucius (a secularist), as much as to Augustine or Aquinas. He picks up its main tenets from Hindu, oral ancient sayings, and literature from the bible to the Viking sagas.

@Soldier957

5 жыл бұрын

K Vjqxzz Thanks for the tip. I gotta read that.

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

We were not a secular nation. Get over it.

@tntramzy12

3 жыл бұрын

Just bought it thank you

@crystalgiddens7276

3 жыл бұрын

@Patricia M Of course

@vhawk1951kl

3 жыл бұрын

How would you go about defining or setting out what "natural" law is? Or, for that matter what 'law' is? Natural law as contrasted with some other kind of law?Most appeals to some supposed "natural" law consist generally of what are no more than bare assertions- as often as not of a moralistic or religious nature. How can "natural" law be discovered? Invariably the proponents of so-called " natural law" have not the faintest idea and simply fall back on bare assertions, unsupported by evidence or any kind of reasoning, leaving so-called "real" lawyers to conclude that natural law is a creature of fancy.

Thank you for your great lecture!

Well that gave me chills. I love Judge Nap.

❗️When he says “little jimmy”. He is talking about James Madison, right ????❗️

@isaiahii6982

4 жыл бұрын

Yes.

Wow! Excellent video. Thanks for sharing.

I see this as just another story/examination that reiterate what was said of humanity from the very beginning.

Ever notice how they all seem to jump right over the civil war .. It really kind of important to realize the mind set on how the Constitution was written.

Brilliantly acknowledged thank you

Wow what an understanding as an individual we all need

Our rights are unalienable because they are un-a-lien-able! So we cannot be separated from our God-given rights.

When in court, ask for evidence of jurisdiction. Until then, listen to Marc Stevens.

@MrJjjd1

5 жыл бұрын

Boanerges The AntiCatholic Bingo!

@beckywatt5048

4 жыл бұрын

Lance Roark Voluntary servitude, consent by deception.

@JennWest-Liberty

3 жыл бұрын

DOJ, CRM 664

We’re the classes in constitution and Supreme Court cases recorded? Is it possible for the general private citizens to take this course or hear recordings?

Judge Nap is the best judge ever!

Can you please post the Q&A that followed ?

@fsmoura

5 жыл бұрын

Hey, are you Joe Knipp, of Bill Whittle fame? Greetings :)

@joeknipp6698

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, that's me ! Didn't know I was famous though !! I'm a fan of Judge Napolitano... in fact, when his TV show was on the air, it was my FAVORITE show, even with the low production values it suffered with. But there is great news... Freedom Watch is returning to TV this fall... can't wait !

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Please explain me why he butchers the story about the mayor and what the logic is behind the notion that our hearts are the source of our unalienable rights? and why he impugned the integrity of our founders? you cannot trust anybody from MSM.

@gtaatmiami

5 жыл бұрын

Joe Knipp it’s returning?! Thank god

@thebigcheese5606

4 жыл бұрын

Ive seen that, and I have been searching for the same one as well.

Great content!

Loved the ending. will carry that

Sometimes I feel YT has an auto thumbs down algorithm. Thanks, Judge. More, please!

A general warrant was what the FBI used against Trump at Mar-a-lago.

Judge Napolitano channeling Lysander Spooner and Learned Hand. Very radical.

The Incomparable Judge Andrew Napolitano

Outstanding

34:30 Unfortunately, Rand Paul just endorsed Judge Kavanaugh, despite knowing his judicial shortcomings - a very foul compromise if you ask me. Mr. Napolitano, please, maybe can you talk some sense into this guy?

@KimarieTeter

5 жыл бұрын

i think there is a plan to use it agaist the coup and domestic enemies. useful tool for a defacto system that shall see its incontrovertable destiny

@attilaevil

3 жыл бұрын

Your Senate is not your Senate. You don't know the facts.

Powerful orrator.❤

Awesome!

Damn you Jimmy!!

This Judge is Brilliant and the knowledge of this VITAL aspect of Western Law should be taught in ALL Law Degrees. Sadly, no one has been taught it in Australia in the last 3 decades. That is why we now have a High Court Bench of Marxist aligned Activist Judges making laws that the People would certainly NOT agree to if forced to go through the proper Referendum channels according to the Constitution. To avoid it our High Court Judges of their OWN VOLITION decided to adopt the theory of Legal Positivism, and eroded a vital and essential part of OUR Constitution. As a final act of contempt to Australians, they didn't even consider the words of the Founding Fathers as to the essential object of the Act. Law 101! They made a political decision based on their Marxist ideology, and the "Guardians of our Constitution" were the very subversives that interpreted an inappropriate and entirely foreign jurisprudence, and displaced the Natural Rights of All Australians. It is Judge made social engineering. It is BAD law. Yet, their subversion will impact generations of Australians. Eventually, some Judges of the High Court may reverse this gross injustice. It will take generations to do so. We need more WISE Judges like Judge Napolitano. May GOD Bless this very great and brilliant Man.

I will die knowing I was faithful to God's Laws.

I would love to hear Judge Napolitano talk about the 9th circuit and how they ruled that the state of California can legally enforce a law that is impossible for Firearm manufacturers to comply with. (Micro stamping)

Powerful stuff

The Lefties in our high schools & colleges should have to play this talk to their classes. (Get off of my rights!)

@chbrules

5 жыл бұрын

Hippity Hopoity get off my property!

@KznnyL

5 жыл бұрын

Its not the left that gave us the Patriot Act! It is not the left that worships police power!

@nanon1982

5 жыл бұрын

The left and the right are on the same team; they have the same pay-masters. Constitutional conservatives (THAT right, or non-left) wouldn't give you the Patriot Act or a police state. These are globalists who are paid by the globalist Elite who gave you the above; their other tools are those who vote for and vocally support the Left. The Republicans are corrupt; the Dems are corrupt, power-mad, and are wacko-Left. They own the education system, from pre-school to graduate school. Neo-cons & Paleo-cons are *ssholes. Lets see what happens next. (The Left is nuts. If you don't see it, then your party is doomed.)

@chbrules

5 жыл бұрын

+Kenneth Leak - What fucking planet do you live on? The Dems voted for the fucking Patriot Act just as much as the GOP. And you're only fooling yourself if you think the radical left fringe would want less authoritarianism than the right either.

@measl

5 жыл бұрын

*Maybe you should take off those rose glasses - what you see with unobstructed vision may surprise you.*

This guy is brilliant

God I love "The Judge".....

Some of us will die on the battlefield.

Consent of the governed is a presumption

I get that Napolitano sounded or leaned in his voice reflection that Kavanaugh was not good to be a lawyer Scrivener on The Patriot Act however the definition of a Scrivener States: “scrivener n. a person who writes a document for another, usually for a fee. If a lawyer merely writes out the terms of a lease or contract exactly as requested by the client, without giving legal advice, then the lawyer is just a scrivener and is probably not responsible for legal errors (unless they were so obvious as to warrant comment). A non-lawyer may act as a scrivener without getting in trouble for practicing law without a license.” Would like to hear more on what Napolitano was leaning towards..... Seems Kavanaugh could have be writing as his client states without giving legal advice.....

To the people of the state of Delaware, and every state in American, most if not all of our political representatives are incompetent through a lack of education pertaining to the Declaration of Independence the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. and are unqualified to hold positions of emoluments in our government that they hold, they need to attend a seminar or an educational course such as the one that Chris Hallett from E- clause LLC provides for free before they can actually perform their job requirements, as defined in the Constitution of the United States of America. Right now in the state of Delaware our legislators are legislating in bad faith which equates to fraud, and fraud nullifies all contracts and agreements, one example I can give you is that we have members of the legislative body who are in both the judiciary and the legislative bodies of government, they are holding two emoluments of authority which is a conflict of interest, and is a direct violation of the Constitution which means every piece of legislation that they have been involved with has been created through bad faith and fraud, and fraud negates all contracts! If we want better representation in our government here in Delaware we must make sure that our legislators and representatives are edified and qualified to hold those positions. Bill Sharpe Ellendale, DE.

we have been givin a great template...now can we keep it...

When in such teaching environments, I respect and enjoy a lot of Judge Nap; however, this, IMO, is one of his better efforts. Yes, he spoke a lot of truth, but, just about every bit of it has been presented --- on several occasions --- in his other videos; where, here, unfortunately, contrary to the introduction and the title, other than repeated generalities, he provided nothing new regarding his thoughts on our DOI. Anyway, such videos are good for those who have not previously seen his act ... and, I cannot say that it is not worth the price of admission.

Can we get a law masterclass from Nap online?

That's a great argument for the right to secession. The colonies rightfully seceded from the Crown, but the States have no right to lawfully secede from (void) their agreement with other States? Sadly the military-industrial complex loves to come to the rescue of despots, despite the potential loss of life, liberty and property. It proves to me, the military, if it is a standing army or Navy is really just an extension of the military-industrial complex. So if a State(s) lawfully secede via the concent of the governed, but cannot physically defend themselves against the aggression (overthrow) of the nation-state it seceded from, it is an invalid secession, but if it can defend itself from its aggressor, it's a lawful secession? To me, this was the greatest unlawful abrogation of our Constitution and Bill of Rights and good old honest Abe was involved in much of it as well as the abrogation of the writ of habeas corpus and others. I always ask my socialist detractors to come up with a Bill of Rights and Constitution that will work and I never get a reply. Might makes right vs. inalienable rights. Has that not always been the underlying dispute?

Alright, Kane!

The Constitution is based upon the conscience of the country and the government, the Constitution is also a loss prevention document for the people to retain their rights under any political circumstance, to stop the theft of liberties and freedoms from any government authorities, and to limit by maxims of law the authorities granted by emoluments to any political entity bound by the Constitution of the United States of America.

the 'Non-Aggression Principle' sounds a lot like Crowley's "Do What Thou Wilt" law. Interesting.

@dr.lyleevans6915

3 жыл бұрын

Libertarianism has been around for ages prior to that evil man’s subversion. He simply used that particular part of the ideology because it served his interests, perverted as they were. Crowley’s “golden rule” should hold no bearings as to your evaluation of libertarianism, as such diversions seek to undermine noble things

What is the essential function of government that only government can serve and no other form of social organization. I believe it is more useful to think in terms of what unchosen, positive duties must be observed by everyone in order for a _free_ society to function well. Consider... *The Anarchist’s Constitution* 1. *There is no Sovereign Immunity.* Any Person (or Persons) who commits force, fraud, or trespass against any other Person’s life, body, or property is liable for restitution to repair the victim to their original condition. 2. *The Right to be left alone is Absolute, subject only to the enforcement of the first rule.* Any Person (or Persons) may deny the use of their life, body, or property to anyone else without any necessity to justify the reasons for their denial. 3. There are no exceptions to these 4 rules. 4. These rules being observed,… do whatever you will. *Remember,… any additional positive duties imposed necessarily imply the state’s right, even duty, to kill anyone who does not comply.* To be very clear,... I conceive of a positive, unchosen duty to be a duty that everyone *MUST* observe and submit to, and, if someone ignores their allegiance to a positive, unchosen duty, socially sanctioned initiatory violence may be, and will be, used to make moral free riders comply. Anarchists insist that they want a society that consists of _rules without rulers_ but then seem to insist that no one can know what those rules are until afterwards,... which, understandably, sounds fairly frightening to most folks who want more reassurance about how socially sanctioned initiatory force will work in the future. It would seem that the only unchosen, positive duty recognized by libertarians/anarchists is the duty of _if you break it, you must fix it._ But in an ideal libertopia, how would even this single duty be enforced, if not by someone using retaliatory violence to protect value, or to regain coercively a value stolen. How would an ideal society do this; what socially recognized _due process of law_ would be constructed to do so. The problem with the *Non Aggression Principle* is that it offers no help in what action to take when others ignore it. Or consider *Six Reasons Libertarians Should Reject the Non-Aggression Principle* at www.libertarianism.org/blog/six-reasons-libertarians-should-reject-non-aggression-principle as showing the *NAP* as being insufficient. And might there not be other unchosen, positive duties? If an abandoned infant will likely die without aid (locked in a hot car, for instance), must not action be taken to save it's life; otherwise it's death by neglect. What could be done by society if society objects to women having abortions performed upon themselves? Would abortifacients be outlawed? Would miscarriages be investigated as being possibly deliberately self-induced? What would be the agreed upon liability for giving heroin to small children? Could heroin be sold out of vending machines? Should businesses be alllowed to create additional risks for the public that live around them without either informing or otherwise compensating the public for such addtional risks (progressive.org/dispatches/fukushima-nightmare-gets-worse/ )? Does a man have to pay child support for a child he did not consent to having, but was spermjacked so as to produce the child? What amount of violence is appropriate to use against someone who gratuitously harms animals? Is it to be permitted for someone to destroy the last members of a living species, just because they own them? How should Improperly disposed of plastics, which kill millions of wild animals, be dealt with? What actions can be compelled in order to deal with C02's contribution to Global Climate Change? In Les Misérables, Jean Valjean steals a loaf of bread to feed his starving sister. Are property rights something held absolutely above the preservation of life? How does the interpretation of the *NAP* vary during emergencies? Is it okay to shoot suspected looters during a riot or natural disaster? Are there statutes of limitations on criminal acts? How are they determined? What actions follow when different actors disagree upon whether or not a criminal is now essentially free of the consequences of their prior criminal actions? Would it be okay for private actors to own military grade weapons? Including biological and nuclear weapons? Who pays to keep habitual criminals incarcerated? Who is liable to victims for crimes of habitual criminals who have been mistakenly released? All mathematics depend upon sets of axioms which are universally accepted as being self-evidently true statements that require no further proof. Until human moral philosophers can come up with such a set of moral axioms for humanity at large,... governments in practice will, necessarily, continue to serve as our only practical alternative. Please consider my statements/questions and leave your comments. What _rules_ without rulers do you think must apply, even without individual consent, in order for a _free_ society to function well? I emphatically agree that democracy sucks. Let's discuss alternatives, and why others must comply with such alternatives,... or else face violent results. If it's any help,... I consider myself to be 90% convinced of anarcho-capitalism, and have been so since I first become libertarian back in 1982 when I was 27 years old. But I also take the matter, of when there is to be a use of socially sanctioned initatory violence allowed and how it is regulated, very seriously. I have always very much wanted to be convinced of an-cap,... so help me if you will. *A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the Public Treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with a result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always followed by dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through the following sequence:* *· From Bondage to Spiritual Faith* *· From Spiritual Faith to Great Courage* *· From Courage to Liberty* *· From Liberty to Abundance* *· From Abundance to Selfishness* *· From Selfishness to Complacency* *· From Complacency to Apathy* *· From Apathy to Dependency* *· From Dependency back into Bondage* ~ Alexander Fraser Tytler 18th century Historian and Jurist *_A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine._* ~ Thomas Jefferson *_The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not._* ~ Thomas Jefferson *_Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide._* ~ John Adams *_Democracy becomes a government of bullies tempered by editors._* ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson *_The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting._* ~ Charles Bukowski *_Democracy: In which you say what you like and do what you’re told._* ~ Dave Barry *_As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_What is any political campaign save a concerted effort to turn out a set of politicians who are admittedly bad and put in a set who are thought to be better. The former assumption, I believe is always sound; the latter is just as certainly false. For if experience teaches us anything at all it teaches us this: that a good politician, under democracy, is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_The highfalutin aims of democracy, whether real or imaginary, are always assumed to be identical with its achievements. This, of course, is sheer hallucination. Not one of those aims, not even the aim of giving every adult a vote, has been realized. It has no more made men wise and free than Christianity has made them good._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard._* ~ H.L. Mencken *_Democracy encourages the majority to decide things about which the majority is blissfully ignorant._* ~ John Simon *_Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people._* ~ Oscar Wilde *_Democracy is a government where you can say what you think even if you don’t think._* ~ Unknown *_Democracy and Socialism are inseparable._* ~ Vladimir Ilich Lenin *_The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter._* ~ Winston Churchill

Judge Napolitano-great man, no forehead.

@stephenmayo9573

5 жыл бұрын

fsmoura but he has hair, a quality I appreciate

Part of the issue is that people ignore the fact that the United States is limited to ten miles square and lands ceded to the United States for defensive purposes. So essentially people are ignorant and it has brought the entire country down!

What makes America exceptional and unique? Because America was designed and created by and for a free people, our government is the only government ever created for the people to rule over the government, and not for the government to rule over the people, like every other government in this world. This is what makes America exceptional and unique for we Americans are the only nation created by and for free people.

In an age where no one agrees on anything we at least have to agree on basic human rights. Economics immigration, and foreign relations policy will all come and go with election cycles as intended but the recognition and preservation of unalienable rights endowed by our creator is the foundation and common ground all Americans should be able to meet. If not...God help us all. Government without consent is immoral and will eventually meet resistance. 2A is necessary and a crucial part of checks and balances. Separation of powers so to speak

Shoulda been Napolitano for the SCOTUS.

"Ius naturale est, quod natura omnia animalia docuit..." Ulpian

God damn judge gives a good speech

18:58

Napolitano for President....

Jury Nullification began with William Penn, didn't it?

I doubt kavenauh realizes the irony that he supported an act that removes due process, then he was almost ousted based on the same lack of respect for the right to due process.

Does resuscitation bring it back.

It is my understanding the war of 1812 started because we decided to do away with a central bank? I realize that is not taught in school but that is in fact the real reason behind the war.

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Amy J. Delevingne Stank? I am not sure what poem you are referring to? Did you have something to offer?

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Amy J. Delevingne Oh, our national anthem. I agree with you that is a magnificent and majestic "poem." I couldn't have guessed that is what you meant. You left a cryptic message and I am not sure how it fits in here.

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Amy J. Delevingne Well, first, I acknowledged upfront my idea is not taught in our schools. I didn't mean to say I am unaware of the pretended reason for the war. What you say is true and they were acts of war committed against the united states, What I am saying is that great britain engaged in those actions right after we disbanded our first central bank and that is the real reason for the war. Of course they couldn't teach that history back then or even today because they intended to re establish a central bank and today we have one so folks would wonder why in the world we do after going to war to get rid of it. .

@crystalgiddens7276

5 жыл бұрын

Amy J. Delevingne You are being far too cryptic for me. I articulated my question clearly (I think) and I do not see how your comments address it. It seems as if we are on two different subjects and I have to admit I don't know what your subject is. You have presented some random facts that shed no light on my question. That much is for sure.

@robertrenk7074

5 жыл бұрын

“War of 1812 started because we decided to do away with the central bank” why would the British fight a war with us if we decided to do away with a central bank?

What the devil is "natural" law? For that matter what is law?

So we are guessing as we go along? Or am I missing something. If we are guessing as we go along surely the constitution can be changed over time. Civilised society? Sure

I did this for my, family and fellow patriots and countrymen, for we have no government representation in the state of Delaware, so I took it upon myself to represent myself, my family, my friends, and the people of the state of Delaware. December 16, 2019 To the Parliamentarian of the United States Senate Washington DC. 1st St., Southeast 2004 Washington DC from William Sharpe Ellendale, DE 19941 Cc: 45th president of the United States Of America, Donald J. Trump Dear Sir / Madam of the Parliamentarian, I am writing you today, to Formally Instruct the United States Senate, To have my State of Delaware's, Constitution, To be Fully investigated and evaluated to ensure that its integrity, is intact and to be in full compliance with the Constitution of the United States of America, and to perform a full and thorough forensic audit of the state of Delaware's Constitution to ensure that it is in compliance as our Constitution requires it to be, and in accordance to this constitutional republic, and to be in Proper form and character in accordance to our Republican constitutional government, Guarantees it to be. The particulars of my concern are based on article 4 section 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence. ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 The Constitution of the United States of America. Concern #1 the ratification process - As written in the State of Delaware Constitution is this lawful and within the parameters of the Constitution of the United States of America? And are all past changes to the state of Delaware’s Constitution, ratification process complete and lawful as per the Constitution requirements? Concern #2 - Is the oath of office, for state officials of the state of Delaware's Constitution binding and lawful as well? Concern #3 - There is no mention of the Foundational Document of Declaration of Independence in this document? Would this also be a constitutional requirement? Concern #4 - There is no mention of the Foundational Documents of the Bill of Rights in this document, which is pertaining to the original numerator Bill of Rights of the United States of America? Concern #5 -Has the Constitution of the State of Delaware ever been forensically audited for compliance in the past, to the compliance to and of the Constitution of the United States of America? If so, when? Concern #6 Under the right to keep and bear arms in Delaware's State Constitution is it an infringement of the right to keep and bear arms, by conditions? (Shall not be infringed upon) in Delaware's State Constitution, s20? Also, stating a person has the right to keep and bear arms ( FOR ) the defense of self, family, home and state, and ( FOR ) hunting and recreational use. These are conditions added to the state of Delaware’s Constitution, infringing upon the right, to hold control of my / our rights which is unconstitutional. Stating that conditions of the right are ( FOR )! Under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, the right to keep and bear arms, no right can have Terms and Conditions attached to it, for it would no longer be a Right but a Privilege, (See Murdoch versus Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling). It is unlawful to convert a right into a privilege. Congress shall not write or pass any laws that infringe upon any existing rights. Enclosed is a letter, It is addressed to me, Bill Sharpe from legislative counsel/division of research from the State of Delaware dated December 3, 2019, confirming an authentication copy of the Constitution of the State of Delaware. I will also be sending you a copy of the State of Delaware's Constitution that they make available to the public. It does not have any authenticating documents attached to it. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Constitutionally and Sincerely, William Sharpe. PLEASE SHARE AND DO THIS FOR YOUR STATE!!!

Why does the judge always look to the left side of the audience ?

Atheist advocate of natural law here. 😎👍🏾 Oh, and FIRST! 🥇

@Donbd83

5 жыл бұрын

The word nature comes from the Egyptian word NTR pronounced Netcher which means God, natural law is Gods law just thought you should know that.

@irlserver42

5 жыл бұрын

Oh, that proves god is real.... and your god too, not the other guy's. Thanks for the enlightenment.

@Donbd83

5 жыл бұрын

I found it ironic that an atheist is praising something that the etymology shows is something that comes from that which he claims doesn't exist.

@Donbd83

5 жыл бұрын

+FifesAndClarions I would say that Thomas Paine understood natural law far better than John Locke or Hobbes.

@Donbd83

5 жыл бұрын

+FifesAndClarions It goes on way before that it has been called many things, karma, cause and effect, even common sense, you can track it back to Zarathustra which is some 2500+ years ago and it started long before then I am sure, very much like gravity something that has always existed but wasn't really defined till 70 or so years ago and even now they still are refining it. Locke, Hobbes, and even Paine couldn't even perfect it as they continuously advocated for that which was in direct conflict with the laws they purport to follow. Seriously watching Locke advocate for the existence of a state is terrifying to read he should of been given a gold medal in gymnastics. Spooner refined it further and took it to its correct outcome staying true to the law. I was attacking no one I found the comment ironic and it is unlikely he knew the etymology of the word, few do. I find irony hilarious, I also enjoy sarcasm and dead pan humor(when you cannot tell if someone is joking or being serious) probably why George Carlin and Bill Hicks are two of my favorite comedians.

I don't like the word, "killed". Let's go with suppressed because I have faith that we can reassert our liberty.

You know Judge that every time you give in to PC crap the enemy wins a little battle.

Oh the foolishness and confusion when man reject God's revealed will. Freedom comes from obeying Jesus.

Unalienable, not inalienable. Poor understanding of the DoI. Poor understanding of the constitution.

The constitution was primarily an instrument to keep the government in check. We are private the government is public. Go and learn.

Natural Law is a Vatican concept.

Do the states or the federal government have unlimited authority and powers?? the answer is absolutely NO! and this is Why. On the enumerated Restraints ( The Bill of rights) on the exercise of power is not subject to interpretation or modification by the entity the restraints are being imposed upon, the restraints imposed by the amendments which were adopted years after the Constitution was ratified to override the legislative, executive and judicial or administrative powers of the government. If this were not the case the restraints would be meaningless! because the government could simply circumvent them modify them or remove them at will. Why would the states have requested and adopted enumerated restraints on the Government and all Government's (states and federal government ) power! subsequent to Ratification of the Constitution, if the government possessed the authority or powers to nullify them? You only have to ask these individuals in government one question, where do their authorities come from to violate our rights? Because they do not have any authority to do this. Nowhere in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights is the authority granted through the emoluments given to government agents or agencies to violate the people's rights! and this would be a violation of the emoluments clause in the Constitution, along with treason and tyranny to overthrow this Republic form of government and to replace it with a foreign government's ideology, and that is what makes it treason. Marbury vs Madison (1803) The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review-the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. Miller versus the US, no right can be converted into a criminal act. "Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void". If the charging or the accusing body, cannot prove the charges are law, they have no subject matter jurisdiction, and are performing piracy of rights or Barratry! The Constitution of the United States of America is supreme law over, executive orders, statute, codes, regulations, or policy! Bill Sharpe, Ellendale, de.

How courts or the whole system? Because as it seems the acts are to ensure prompt tips..yes you are trying to say it's bit by bit...its exactly all the system that renames a attempt to fix the way..but enabling was the key factor. They grant certain rights. What are you saying it's redundant game? Get real

Judge Nap, I'm not even American, but I have 5 spiritual, political leaders/guides: 1. Thomas Jefferson 2. Andrew Napolitano 3. Gerald Celente 4. Dr. Ron Paul 5. Rand Paul After that it's political/bureaucratic/corporate mediocrity & worse!!!

He's a good man, but doesn't seem to know what the difference between ruler, and ruled. The Melian dialogue is always in play.

No forehead is a good, honorable, and desirable thing, some of you may have noticed.....No further comment on said point!

Qui tacet consentire videtur. "He who is silent is taken to agree." Consent is implied by silence, and, more explicitly, by compliance. 36:16 ...my view that government is essentially a myth. It is based upon mythology. Make believe the king is divine. Make believe he can do no wrong. Make believe the voice of the people is the voice of God. Make believe that the people have a voice. Make believe that the representatives of the people actually do represent the people. Make believe that the all men are created equal. Make believe that they're not. And when we accept these myths... Don't confuse fallible corrupt government actors with the ideal of good government. The problem is that government can't be effective in its goals without religion. There were statements that indicated that our Constitution was only made for a religious people. A big problem is that despite that fact, there is a clause in the Constitution that forbids religious tests for public officials. One solution is to not tolerate corruption or otherwise immoral behavior. If the president (via the Attorney General) or the citizens (via impeachment) were vigorous at punishing bad behavior, then there would be far less problems. These bad actors need to be booted out of office and spend some time in jail.

@camilojazzfernandes

3 жыл бұрын

Does anyone know why Wikipedia not have a page for "controlled opposition"? ... hahaha ... i love that question which just occurred in a few of my intoxicated brain cells and i had to post it some where ... sorry ... okay ... i'll copy it somewhere more relevant soon ... have fun anyways.

Predictably Rand Paul caved.

You can come at me illuminati I'm ready 😌

The judge is exactly right. Government is a religion and authority is the doctrine of the religion of the god government and it's false claim of authority.

*It is as clear as the meridian sun they intended for the Mayor to be acquitted. The judge completely misrepresents the prosecution of the Mayor. As mentioned, the Mayor was indeed (for all intents and purposes) "technically" guilty of treason and the powers that be were fully aware of his "treasonous"' behavior. What could they do?* Once acquitted, the mayor could never be charged again but without an acquittal the prospect of prosecution would hang over his head and not only that he could be known ("rightly") for his "treasonous behavior." The solution is not just ignore it. *He needed to be acquitted.* They quite literally prosecuted him to his advantage. For his own sake. And "technically" for their own sake as well. They took their oaths of office seriously back then and they were ALL duty bound to uphold the law. The judge is intentionally (unless he is ignorant as hell) misrepresenting this event. *You CANNOT trust MSM or anybody from MSM.* They are literally traitors! *He has turned a perfectly noble exercise in proper judgement into a diabolical example of government overreach and by extension he impugns a founder (The "Father" of The Constitution) and by further extension the documents he helped write.* A half truth is a whole lie! And finishes up with (as if the source of our rights suddenly need revision in light of his false propaganda) that our rights really come from our hearts and not our Creator? What kind of childish gibberish is this?