檢控官有一套國際標準既「檢控守則」，現在美國CSCC就係覺得香港政府既檢控官違反守則，胡亂撿控，所以才提出制裁！

被美帝制裁的檢控人員，及法官是他們的榮幸，為共產党做事應該有榮譽和收穫，希望早些公佈這批人，15個太少了，150個就差不多。

同意. 制裁作惡法官

檢控專員絕對要負責。撿控是直接令到受害人入罪的其中一環。獄中厨子角色完全不同。

@chunmanlau805

2 жыл бұрын

P

聽党話，跟党走，奉旨行事，亦應承受制裁 。

檢控官，被冤枉？不應被制裁，只聽話，叫你殺人，殺了，只聽話照做，這可推得一干二净，不要負責？荒謬。

這班被制裁的專員, 為国光榮捐軀, 死而無憾啦!

如果講邏輯 又可唔可以話 檢控如果不作檢控 法官根本冇案可審可判 所以問題仍然出在檢控 及執法機構

打工就可以去做衰野賤格野？？ 做咗衰野有布應天公地道啦！ 有思想良知可以選擇唔L做 香港有大把律師樓請人

Support

高興看到 Gordon 返

@mylepham5241

2 жыл бұрын

高興看到 Gordon 參與今次的光明頂。

為虎作倀，倀有罪否？

陶生，(救)得靚

哎呀陰功囉! 要快啲買定包爆穀先!!

❄️

平庸之惡

制裁法官 + 檢控人員 > 步入惡性循環 > 香港更加被邊緣化 現時環境看不見官員被制裁 香港政府不執行(或暫緩執行)國安法有何阻嚇力? 大不了流失/空缺職位由較低資歷生力軍補上 最壞情況 > 沒有法律背景人員充當法官/檢控官 惡性循環造成整個司法制度 / 質數崩盤 唔好幸災樂禍以為唔關自己事 > 其實坐緊沉船攬住一齊死🤢 Remarks: 有點想不通, 從(a)香港(b)美國(c)中國角度出發 1. 制裁司法官員對香港帶來什麼正面影響? 2. 制裁司法官員對香港帶來什麼負面影響? 可否一一列出? 有時幾無奈 + 只可說吃得鹹魚抵得渴 講到尾 opportunity cost > 每人情況不同 > 沒有智慧不以客觀量化!

@brianho6625

2 жыл бұрын

口頭禪 > 香港的法制 : 《有特色的普通法》 Rule by Law + Rule of Law 混合版 國安法是萬能KEY > 凌駕於基本法 選擇在這裏生活+搵食 > 要懂得智慧欣然接受適者生存🤐 > 反之自找麻煩😂 當年要有警覺隨時變韭菜🤣 Remarks 在這樣境地生存, 有以上心態 還需要順應天命 + 香港共孽 這樣你的心理質素就會很高了😁

無檢椌何來法官判罪？

11

無一個係無辜的

点解陶生講晒.請嘉賓做咩?

由陶生對流亡網台火力全開到為尊貴律政司申冤，感覺陶生不單係識時務才子咁表面，更加係一個食盡四方飯嘅老戲骨

陶x真係好L荒謬！！ 不知所謂！！

你咪唔好做囉！

陶傑竟然為班劊子手護駕？ 有沒搞錯？

燒外国護照抗议。

一」

黃世澤是個叻仔有腦之人 （我反而覺得袁弓夷無嘜腦） 黃世澤雖然在兩年前我在他video 下留言 叫他不要這樣批評Steve Bannon 你又不是住美國 有D嘢你唔知 不要這樣criticize Steve Bannon 我説了之後 黃世澤立即block 了我 但雖然如此 我覺得黃世澤是正確的 他出video 很快 系第一個行出來解釋＂香港人海內外議會＂ Online voting 是不可行 非常之叻 非常之快 這個就是黃世澤 #另外一點 前Hong Kong British Embassy 現在倫敦的 鄭文傑Simon Cheng 也搞了一個 港人的＂影子議會＂ 我覺得倫敦的＂影子議會＂ （他們的核心價值就是 透明 包容 問責） 倫敦的Hong Kong Watch 比袁弓夷的為人信譽和信用 不知高出幾千倍 我自己都是一個British citizen 另外我覺得Tony John Connor 在最近健仔這事上已經黃了 因為去倫敦採訪他們為他們洗白的真是中國黨媒 香港星島旗下的東周利East Week There is a signing going on Search these 5 words to sign ＂Current Stanford University petitions-Gu＂to sign

其实当年纳粹集中营的看守也是打份工啫

The only time you change representing country is retirement. You go back to your original country. Or, you do not make it into the Olympic Team. Resource deprivation, lack of population base in domestic leisure. Gu is not the case. She had been in Youth Team USA Olympic ski since age 9 IOC FIS (International Olympic Committee, Federal International Ski) can follow through check requiring Gu to fulfill the full settlement naturalization requirement China 3 years, and abiding by the China Nationality Law of ＂a person whose application as a Chinese National has been approved shall not retain foreign nationality＂ Stanford University can follow through by application form 2020 Dec check of Gu claiming herself to be a US Presidential Scholar Award nominee $50,000 US scholarship, the failed bid result of which would only come out in March 2021, and by that time Stanford University had already ＂Early Admission＂Gu without seeing the result of the failed bid US Presidential Scholar Award US$50,000/Stanford University can follow through by checking Gu application form 2020 Dec of not telling Stanford University she was not Team USA despite of the fact that Gu was in Youth Team USA Olympic ski since 9, and despite of the fact that Gu had submitted her Chinese Passport to the Olympic Committee and had represented China Team since Dec 2019 in international competitions Lausanne Switzerland (Jan 2020) Calgary Canada (Jan 2021), by not telling Stanford University on the application form 2020 Dec she was not representing Team USA, Stanford University athletic programming athletic scholarship (United States Summer Olympic athletes majority of them concentrate in Stanford University） There is question Gu 3 pieces of medals Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 Because you have to fulfill do the full set Of International Olympic Committee rule Naturalized 3 years China Nationality Law Gave up US citizenship at 18 but Gu never did 9/3/2021 Saved competing because she did not Do the full set of IOC rule of complying with China settlement naturalization law There is a question Gu 3 pieces of medals Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 Because Gu was still US citizen when she competed Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 (She never renounced her US citizenship) There is a question Gu 3 pieces of medals Which country to belong USA China the medals Because Gu was still USA citizen when she competed Beijing Winter Olympics 2022 But she only did half a set of the Settlement requirement to naturalize with China Whereby IOC instructed Gu to comply With the settlement naturalization requirement China Nationality Law So greedy these people Gu Gu mother Gu grandmother They only did half a set of Gu’s naturalization With China Never done the full set Ie vis-á-vis Gu still America citizen when Competing for those 3 medals China Search ＂current Stanford University petitions-Gu＂to sign

陶傑越來越仆街

@johnrambo3906

2 жыл бұрын

條pk 一直都係個徹頭徹尾既偽君子

唔識法律亂講，失禮人

@yinchungwong474

2 жыл бұрын

唔識法律，除了主控官當AO政務官外，講錯咗乜？