Jesse Lee Peterson's Bonkers Interview with Jeet Heer
The crew watches and admires Jeet's patience as Jesse lobs insane talking points at him with breathtaking efficiency, at one point even arguing the slavery wasn't that bad.
Follow Ben on Twitter: @BenBurgis
Follow GTAA on Twitter: @Gtaa_Show
Become a GTAA Patron and receive numerous benefits ranging from patron-exclusive postgames every Monday night to our undying love and gratitude for helping us keep this thing going:
patreon.com/benburgis
Read the weekly philosophy Substack:
benburgis.substack.com
Visit benburgis.com
Пікірлер: 45
This is fucking awesome.
Jeet is the best
15:09 “it’s kinda stupid to analyze what he’s saying.” Is essentially the headline.
07:20 - Canadian ? 07:25 - Black faces walking around Canada ? 08:20 - Personally 08:29 - What if a black POTUS wore white face ?
This almost comes off as a parody. If you didn't know the guy, you would think that this is some sort of comedy skit.
@ZER0--
2 күн бұрын
off
@-suphur
2 күн бұрын
@@ZER0-- Do you feel better now? Will you sleep tonight ffs?
OMFG. How is this real?!
09:29 - The NAACP is no good . . . 09:38 - I'm going to have to reject that 09:42 - Why ? I'm black 09:45 - NAACP was founded by W.E.B. DuBois
I'm dying.
Jeet is the man!
Fk me, it's Uncle Ruckus
@FentonMulley-cz8pv
2 күн бұрын
100%
AMAZIN
Ben is still upset that JLP made him look like a fool a few years ago.
Jesse is the man!
Man Jeet should have just come out as a Christian too
Jlp has a special mind and I don't mean that as an insult
Lol i would get myself canceled if i went on that show. I already have a bit of a problem having the sense of humor of an edgy 12 year old. This guy would take me over the top though.
I don’t think that it’s a bit. Pretty sure JLP was kicked in the head by a horse.
@PashtunDoughnut33
3 күн бұрын
It’s only a bit in the sense that jlp is totally cynical. He plays the dumb black guy that spews white supremacy & his white audience loves it
Bayduh! How anyone takes JLP seriously is astounding. Funny guy though.
@LukeMcGuireoides
Күн бұрын
Amazin
Ive never been able to tell if this is just a a character he plays.
‘Mazing
Is their a link to the original jlp video?
AMAZIN'!
jeet implied aladdin was indian which is literal arabian erasure HOLD THIS MAN ACCOUNTABLE
Its a right of passage for all leftists to be privileged with an interview from jlp
I thought this guy went away when he was outed as one of them gays
I’m thinking he had no clue who Jesse Lee Peterson was
@user-ii7fi7ln9n
2 күн бұрын
Neither did Ben when he went on JLP's show
that was hilarious
BETA!
Some Bull-Jeet
Hey, I really enjoyed your content. After your debate with Destiny, I am going to unsubscribe. What an incredibly bad faith discussion. Jesus, dude. WTF Regards, years long subscriber
10:24 - But the NAACP wasn't founded by black people . . . founded by a white woman 10:31 - That's not true 10:38 - W.E.B. DuBois was not a white woman 12:00 - Guy with headphones is a poor listener
Peterson is a certified clown.
Peterson is dead wrong about borders. Borders function as political interventions against the free market imprisoning capital, goods, labour, and production. Abolishing borders - making the movement of capital, goods, labour and production 'frictionless', would double world GDP increasing it by around $ 100,000,000,000,000.00, one hundred trillion dollars according to the work of theoretical economists. In the case of Haiti removing barriers to the movement of labour allows skilled Haitian workers to increase their income by 100X. Freeing the market from the depredations of political intervention whether that intervention is of a democratic, socialist, communist, or libertarian stripe, is the surest way to prosperity for all. Oh and BTW no borders = no states = no wars. What's not to like ?
@chunksloth
2 күн бұрын
Please explain how... any law works without borders. How does tax work? How does homosexual marriage work? Literally any law that the world doesn't universally agree upon. Thx in advance
@robertcarpenter8077
2 күн бұрын
@@chunksloth Sure. Law, like language, belongs to a class of institutions termed 'emergent', meaning they form not by individual human intention but rather by way of unintentional, dispersed, complex, collective processes. Such processes occur much faster than biological evolution but much slower than individual intentional design. Such law is sometimes termed 'natural' law, law without an author. Political authority can be said to have colonized this natural law, transforming law into a strategy of domination, sometimes termed 'positivist' law. Now think of language. There is no centralized, monopoly political authority producing and enforcing language yet language, the most critical of all institutions, continuously and spontaneously evolves, adapts, forming new words, new phrases, new idioms so on and so on. It is the same with natural law the difference being that natural law functions to prevent and when necessary peacefully resolves disputes. Interestingly you mention homosexual marriage. Now it is precisely under political / positivist law that homosexual relations were criminalized, that the state incarcerated homosexuals for the positivist 'crime' of misgendering themselves. Now of course political law is always contested, always up for grabs, the subjugated always maneuvering to arrogate political power to themselves in order to rework the positivist law deployed against them. And thus today positivist law still criminalizes misgendering but reworked to now flip the scripts.