Holy smokes! This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for! I'm not even playing guitar: I'm a piano player but this explanation of jazz theory is outstanding. Very clear and really straight forward! I could watch this content every day HAPPILY! Thank you so much!

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Great lesson....as a jazz-fusion guitarist myself I always look for new ways to learn and incorporate these notions constructively into my playing. Personally, I noticed that the more you adopt chord substitutions, the further away you get from the "feel" you're trying to express with a chord progression you come up with (so, not necessarily the typical 1,6,2,5), BUT at the same time, being an avid Pat Metheny fan for over 40 years, I couldn't help but noticing the way he uses substitutions in different renditions of his own songs, STILL managing to maintain the overall meaning of the message or the atmosphere of the piece he's playing. I suppose my point is YES, do use chord subs, but be careful on how to use them, try to not abuse them, as I notice some jazz-fusion musicians do, just for the sake of "Hey look how good and articulate I am!".... 🙂

Cool. Just a catch detail. On the 1 4 3m 6m 2m 5 you gave them all the same time value. The 2m 5 should’ve been twice as long.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for pointing this out! On the music the 2 and 5 are four beats, but I play them two beats. Typically that chord progression would have them two beats long like I played it. But all could be four beats as well

@vicormule735

Жыл бұрын

Hmm, you’re substituting over a 4 bar phrase so I would think you’d want it to remain a 4 bar phrase. All good, though

@matthewruiz519

Жыл бұрын

@@vicormule735I found one!

@ziggyzaagsma473

Жыл бұрын

Noticed it too , but I suppose he was just showing us the chords there, and not how to play them in time.

@zackaaron8921

Жыл бұрын

@@Learnjazzstandards the problem with this explanation is that, if you do not maintain the common ground of “4 bars of music” … you’re not actually practicing chord substitution. You have to maintain form and time feel. Let’s get that straight!

i have heard this explained to me for 30 years. Your explanation is the best that i have heard yet, very informative. Thank you.

@Learnjazzstandards

6 ай бұрын

Wonderful!

I feel like a lot of these chord substitution don’t need to entirely replace the chords. Mainly because the chord progression you used to work on was simple for the sake of explaining but like you could keep the chord the same for the first two beats and then sub them for the last two beats of a measure. For example I think in bar two you could do two beats of Am7 and two beats of A7 which both utilized the secondary dominant but also the chromatic motion of the third going from C to C# to finally D as the home.

THANKS! Don't worry about going too fast or whatever. We can back it up and watch again what we didn't get the 1st time. GREAT lesson! Thanks, again!

FANTASTIC lesson. Thanks. Bill Evans did these sort of substitutions SOOOOO cleverly.. subtly and aesthetically. THank you for this lesson.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it! Bill Evans was a master at this

Trumpet player trying to understand what’s going on when I hear “good comping” love this video. Keep making educational content like this. I can’t wait to watch more of your videos

I dont know about total beginners, but for me, as somebody who has mostly studied classical theory and not much jazz theory, you made it make so much sense to me.

Excellent excellent excellent, one of the most helpful videos in my jazz guitar education I have found so far thank you.

@Learnjazzstandards

2 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful, thank you!

It's so nice to hear this and understand everything you are talking about. This all sinks in after a while. Very different from when I first started watching all these videos online.

I would not have had the chance to learn this. I'm 72 and it's the first time I've gotten it. Thanks for the guidance.

This is why I love jazz. The creative potential is insane

Really helpful. This sums up 4-5 different concepts that help been perpetually confusing to me. Thx!!

A very neat summation of common jazz/blues chord substitutions! It takes me a lot longer to go through these concepts with my students!

Absolutely amazing lesson dude! Thanks so much, you are really the best! It would be very useful when you also show a freeboard graphic with the chords you are using 💜

Yo that back door dominant sound was fire. I like reharming lady bird with a circle of fifths from the bIII in the turnaround to the bVII at bar 4.

Wow 😮 and thankyou so much for this simpliest yet effective ideas. Really appreciate. Lots of thankssss from India❤❤❤

@Learnjazzstandards

6 ай бұрын

My pleasure 😊

This is the first time I understand all of these concepts so easily ✊

great item, nicely compact and concise. without it becoming messy or unclear. well done and thanx!

Perfectly presented and paced! Please NOTE: You said that Bb7 is the back door dominant of G7 (and I believe you meant of C).

Thank You much, Great Lesson, will applying, ❤❤❤❤❤

This is the best lesson I've found on this talk so far 💯

Thank you so much for helping me understand the chord subs that I never understood before🙇‍♂

Best explanation ever!

@Learnjazzstandards

3 ай бұрын

Wow, thanks!

Very helpful. Thanks for the video!

this is really good!! thank you for this video

Great lesson, Brent! Very concise and clear - thanks for posting this 👍🏻

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, Donna!

I've never seen an accurate tutorial that's better than this. This is so straight to the point

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! I'm glad you find it helpful.

You are a great teacher thank you 🙏

So great explanation. Thanks!

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Thank you, Brother 🌹😎🌹

Thanks,very useful!

The question is: do you still improvise diatonically over the substitutions (as if they weren't there basically) or are you now forced to improvise on the new changes? and, conversely, can you use substitute arpeggios to improvise over a I vi ii V?

@Osnosis

Жыл бұрын

As long as you resolve/land on a chord tone in the progression, you’re good.

@tinman2420

Жыл бұрын

you work with the new progression.

this vidio convert complex data to not complex data very good leasson

Thanks very from the inner of my heart. This lesson enlightened more my chords knowledge and stuff. Can you share also the thematic about improvisation on chords substitution on C A D G progression. Thanks in advance!

Very well done 👍.

I agree ,great lesson.

감사합니다. 많이 배워 갑니다.^^

Great review!

Great video. Explanations are very clear and concise! 👌

@Learnjazzstandards

9 ай бұрын

Glad you liked it. Thanks!

Amazing video, thank you so much!!

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Glad you like it!

Beautiful guitar sounds.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much!

Thanks!

This is amazing. I'm learning jazz guitar now. The big issue is getting this stuff into my brain. Being able to identify things on the fly.

Well explained

I can interpret a large part of the function of these substitutions from your expressions while playing em. Haha love it, great video altogether I learned a hell of a lot

Well done mate. It is a relief to see young people demystifying this stuff for the generations to come. Very clear and concise information. Thanks you got me subscribed.

@Learnjazzstandards

10 ай бұрын

Much appreciated

Great video!

@Learnjazzstandards

4 ай бұрын

Thanks!

Muito bom !

It would be interesting to talk about how substitutions work with the other instruments, particularly the bass. The diatonic substitution in the first example seems straightforward. If the bass still treats that bar as Cmaj7, playing Emin7 over Cmaj7 just turns it into Cmaj9. For some of the other substitutions, though, it seems you would need to plan ahead, hope the other musicians have very big ears, or enjoy some very spicy sounds.

Where’ve you been all my life. I finally understand.

I would recommend examining the concept of chord substitution, from the perspective of harmonic movements. In example: substitute |D-7|G7| for two bars of Gsus4. (RULE: substitute a “2 5” movement with a sus chord build off the root of the “5”. ) you could sub an entire 3625 with just a long sus4 chord. A more modern technique, but used by early luminaries. A well rounded explanation of chord substitution should touch on the concept of “pedaling a bass note”. A bass player can suggest to an improviser, a “chord substitution”, on the fly (often with the use of a ‘pedal tone’)

@zackaaron8921

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your efforts in educating aspiring jazz musicians 🙂

Where is the explanation of the Autumn Leaves chord subs in the thumbnail? They are very interesting.

This video reminds of that song from McDonald’s. Because IM LOVING IT!

Jerry Coker Jazz improvisation. The real bible of understanding jazz chords and more.

What is Bb7 the secondary dominant of? It looks like this was borrowed from the relative minor using the Eb as your reference note to get the Fmin7 to the Bb7. Is this the way to think of it?

Thnx mr master

that's a great lesson. you got a new subscriber.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Excelente video... Muchas gracias, like, suscripción y activada la campanita de notificaciones, saludos cordiales desde Lima-Perú 🇵🇪

Very good sir!

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

excellent goos sir Brent !!

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

👍👍 it's good for kids

Such valuable information! Question: when improvising over the various substitutions how does it sound when you play lines that relate to the original, non-substitution chord?

@BassByTheBay

Жыл бұрын

Spicy 😊. Seriously, though, you should just try it and hear with your own ears. You could start with a very simple example that illustrates the emphasis on different chord tones. E.g., in Brent's example, you could just play do, re, mi (C, D, E) over each chord of the I vi ii V progression and listen to how different chord tones are emphasized depending on the chord being played. E.g., on the ii chord (Dmin7), the 7 and 9 are emphasized which adds more color/tension than when playing the same notes over the C chord. It gets more complex, of course, when you play non-diatonic harmony, but you could try a similar exercise with a more complex progression. A lot of it is determined by the harmony you want to imply, and skilled improvisors take into account the harmony of phrases rather than of just a single chord.

Whew, I am almost getting this...would be helpful for you to please show hand positions more clearly....thanks!

Impecable

God bless tritone subs there is the jazz core❤

I'm still a noob with music theory, but this was such a great explanation

This is sooo goooooooooooooooood.

I was a student in the prior century. I've forgotten all the *why* of subs. It's all been reduced to alt Dom7 subs, tri tone sub, and symmetric dim scale theory. I kinda always think in dim chords a half step apart... Putting this in my study folder. Thanks.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Awesome!

What is the guitar you use in the video?

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

It’s a custom Victor Baker

Something occurred at 2:30 that I do not understand. Can you kindly explain how and why you substituted a Aminor7th with a Eminor7th ? What was the process for choosing the Eminor7th ? Is there a formula or something?

4:12 I am a bit confused by the statement that A7 tonicizes Dmin7 by being the V chord for the Dmin key center. Diatonic chords in the key of Dmin are: Dmin7-Emin7b5-Fmaj7-Gmin7-Amin7-Bbmaj7-C7 So the Amin7 as the fifth of the Dmin key should already provide a tonic feel for Dmin7. Wouldn't A7 tonicize a Dmaj7 chord instead? What am I missing here? I would very much like to understand this.

I love chords and the subs. However I have a hard time understanding how the subs are done. While your demo helps put it in use I don't have a solid idea of how to choose the right subs. I have to let the music and sound guide me to what's right.

6:40

Dude! It was fucking brilliant and of a great use!

Hi , how come Fmin7 a two? In the backdoor dominant example?

@loulou7137

Жыл бұрын

djspexx1, He was treating the Bb7 chord as if “IT” was a 5 (V). And counting backwards from the Bb [5 or V7], 5 to the 4 is one step down Ab [4 or IV], 4 to the 3 is a half step down, G [3 or iii min], 3 to the 2 is one step down “F” [2 or ii min]. Adding the minor 7 note to Fmin, he gets “Fmin7” (2) - Bb7 (5).

fun stuff.

Hi, I didn't quite understand what makes Fmin7 the 2chord in the backdoor dominant example. Would appreciate a brief explanation, thanks!

@user-xu8bl3nl5r

Жыл бұрын

Im confused in that part aswell, wouldnt the 2 be the Dm7 ??

@user-xu8bl3nl5r

Жыл бұрын

I think whats hes doing is that since the Bb7 is the dominant of E then the Fmin7 is the two of E But im just guessing

@jodyguilbeaux8225

6 ай бұрын

right, i am confused to where he got f-7 as the 2 chord, you and i are the only ones who caught it. That is from all the comments below the video.

At 9:45 you called the Fmin7 a “two” but what is that in relation to? It’s the iv to the C and the v to the Bb right? It would be a ii to an Eb but there isn’t one

@jibjubby

2 ай бұрын

it's a ii7(two) in relation to the Eb tonality that Bb7 is borrowed from. The Bb7 resolves to a different place (C), but we connect the F-7 to the Bb7 because they share a key. We could call the F-7 the iv of C in the same way we could call call Bb7 the bVII7 of C, but it' easier to think of it as a ii7-V7 in the new key (Eb) which we momentarily drift into.

wow this was super super useful and clear, thanks a lot :)

Nice Victor Baker archtop.

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

9:46 Why is the Bb7 the secondary dominant of Cmaj7? isnt it a back door dominant? and why the Fmin7 is the ii chord?? isnt Fmin7 the V of Bb7?? I dont get it.

Nice victor baker

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

great thx so understandable.... let's substiute

@Learnjazzstandards

Жыл бұрын

Glad you found it helpful!

My way of thinking about a tritone sub may not technically be correct. But I always just think of it as a dominant 7th chord that’s a half step above the target chord. I mean that’s how the voice leading works that way too. So I’ve always just thought of it like that

@cesargomezu1459

Жыл бұрын

Easy and correct way of thinking

@heiro9611

Жыл бұрын

@@cesargomezu1459 to me theirs just a lot more thinking involved with how it’s usually described “go to the V chord, then go a tritone above that chord, and make it a dominant 7th chord”

@cesargomezu1459

Жыл бұрын

@@heiro9611 totally. We can deeply understand and that's great, and we can also have a fast practical way of doing it on the spot ✅

@rogerpercival5486

7 ай бұрын

That is correct Your just not trying to break it down .. g7 to c r c# 7 to c ….😊

The example you use for the first type, diatonic substitution, is a iii7 chord, but the following chord is a vi chord. So really, this is identical to the second kind of substitution, since E is the dominant fifth of A right? I think you mean to say that we could substitute ANY diatonic chord for any of the others and this would be an example of it, but it is a bit confusing since the chord you picked ends up doing nothing more than the retonicizing substitution would.

Mostly I say, it’s for easier transitions with guitar chord shapes

Can someone explain to me why the Fmin7 is a ii chord in Cmaj7-Fmin7-Bb7? 9:44

@amirsoliman74

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I have the same question; I thought the F was the iv chord (in relation to C) but “minored” ???

@HaddaNuff

Жыл бұрын

It comes from the flat 3 key of the target which is eventually leads back to Cmaj. This makes a G Phrygian as an altered dominant (G dom. b9 b6) without the natural third. Key of Eb unresolved. Throw the natural 3rd into the G dom. and you now enter a new mode. Harmonic minor.

can i treat this progression 1-6-4-5 same meaning as this 1-6-2-5 for further development？or 1-6-4-5 is another jazz chord theory？

@mattdeluccia153

Жыл бұрын

They’re essentially the same. Notice how 3/4 of the notes in the 2 chord are also in the 4 chord. I believe in classical music theory both are considered “predominant” chords because they anticipate the 5 dominant chord. They basically are different ways of achieving the same harmonic function.

4:20

i like your guitar what kind is it?

@Learnjazzstandards

2 ай бұрын

Thank you! It's a custom-made Victor Baker. You can find the details in this video: kzread.info/dash/bejne/q6FmusR6hqefdcY.html

Omg what guitar is that?

You say Bb7 is the secondary dominant. But of what? Also how is Fmin7 a two?

Whose II is that Fmin7?

Premium content!

Thanks to the song Black Sabbath, I know what a tritone is 😂

9:55 not sure why the Fm7 is a 2?

@k-chill8428

8 ай бұрын

Does he mean the Bb7 is acting as a 5, therefore making the Fm7 its 2 chord?

this is not jazz theory this is just music theory

Well, now I know why I can’t and don’t play jazz.