At least somebody has the balls to speak the truth!!

Still pushing for the 8.3L👹

Trumps new slogan. MBMGA. Make Big Motors Great Again!

@jarrsong

2 ай бұрын

LOVE IT!

If GM produces the 8.3 and puts it in a pickup truck my 2023 Denali Ultimate dually will have to find a new home.

@jjpark1989

2 ай бұрын

Just have both 🤷

@techs1smh13

2 ай бұрын

​@@jjpark1989 absolutely 💯

@t.l.robinson2162

2 ай бұрын

@@jjpark1989 I already have 3 trucks.

@jjpark1989

2 ай бұрын

@@t.l.robinson2162 might as well make it 4 🤷

@roadrunnergtx68

2 ай бұрын

Me too

100% my friend! Always speak your Truth! God bless America! 🙏🇺🇸

Get out and vote AMERICA- You are so on point!!! OUR FREEDOMS ARE BEING STRIPPED FROM US👍👍💯🇺🇲💯🇺🇲💯

YOU ARE THE MAN !!!!!!! Smaller displacement more efficient engines have been the trend for a long time...

That would be cool but more importantly we just want a diesel that won't go into limp mode while towing in the wilderness 😂

Actually increased displacement can improve emissions. Mercedes Benz did this throughout the 80’s, 90’s, and 00’s. Ex 190D 2.0 vs emission complaint 2.2 diesel.

@dawsongranger4940

2 ай бұрын

The Getty Adventure has a much better video about this engine. Because diesel engines are tested based off their nox emissions running an 8.3 liter would cause lower cylinder pressures and less heat therefore less nox emissions. Sure it’s less efficient but that doesn’t matter because the trucks aren’t tested on that

PREACH IT- WE LOVE IT💯🇺🇲💯🇺🇲💯

Glad you have the guts to tell it like it is or can be in our future

100%. FJB!!! I believe the Cummins engine brake is better in the I6 because the longer stroke. It had more torque advantage on the crank.

@techs1smh13

2 ай бұрын

And Newsom 💯

@jamis0nify

2 ай бұрын

It's got nothing on my DD15 :)

@ROYALxHYPE

Ай бұрын

That DD15 ain't got NOTHING on that 60 series.

The Democrats are hypocrisy. The production of an ICE engine is cleaner than lithium batteries. This electric BS must stop. I love my 2023 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 with the 5.3L V8. I get decent mileage on my 5.3. I don't have a lead foot so I see 14 City 23 Highway. I don’t like to drive past 75 because anything north of 75 and your MPG goes down considerably. I live in Columbus, Ohio for reference. If you stay out of the gas the N/A V8's can get good MPG's. At 70 mph I have seen 25.3 MPG on I-70.

@Bigmoney1997

2 ай бұрын

I get about 18-19 city and highway

@turnerruma5977

2 ай бұрын

@@Bigmoney1997 I get around 11 City and 18-20 highway in the winter 14 to 23-25.3 in the summer.

@c21meister

2 ай бұрын

The republicans don’t know how to govern

@Bigmoney1997

2 ай бұрын

The most I ever got on a tank was 400 miles

I agree that the rumored 8.3L Duramax is nothing more than just talk, I can't see GM doing that in todays world. I will say though, the idea of having a beefed up I6 Duramax in the HD's would be pretty awesome. That would give GM a unique position in the HD market, offering both diesel types, I6 & V8.

America First

I think you broke KZread community guidelines. LOL

I agree with you.

Lets get this guy more viewers subscribed . Share and like

0-60 times are not a proper performance standard for diesel torque.

If it’s true it’ll be choked out as FK thanks to EPA emissions. #FJB.

I agree about the politics, but I don't necessarily agree about the challenge in making a bigger engine work in the current regulatory environment. A bigger displacement engine can run lower stresses, and that might actually have benefits that help reduce emissions. Then again, emissions targets are constantly shifting, and places like California are straight up banning ICE vehicles, so the idea of any new or big changes in ICE is kind of doubtful.... We will see.

You know what else sucks, besides this admin?? All the other states that latch onto and copy Commifornia's emissions policies......

@techs1smh13

2 ай бұрын

Like a cancer all other liberal woktards think it's the greatest whatever Newsome does.

I think an 8.3 liter will fit in the 3/4 and 1 ton truck, no problem. Remember the Cadillac El Dorado of the 70s? They came 500 cubic inch motors, that's 8.1 liters.

i just bought a 2024 F 250 with the HO power stroke j 500 HP 1200 FT lbs amazing puling power and best of all its a FORD

Is there enough room between the radiator and the firewall for an I6 in a GM truck ? Realistically I don't see them putting a 8.3 in the 2500 , and possibly not the 3500 . The towing capacity and GCWR will go thru the roof into the 40,000 lb range or higher , making much bigger brakes mandatory . A heavier duty frame may also be required . That being said , could you imagine a 3500 dually on 22.5s to clear the brakes and sitting about six inches taller than they do now ? Or how about a regular cab , medium duty , with a ten foot long pickup bed , similar to the Longhorn pickups they built from '68-'72 ?

Larger displacement will have lower cylinder pressure, lesser heat and less stress on the emissions equipment I'd think

Right on everything you said!

An 8.3L big-block gas (without AFM) engine from GM seems far more likely than a complex, and expensive 8.3L diesel. The I6 6.7L Cummins sounds great until you start trying to get to the back of the motor halfway under the dash; #5 and #6 fuel rails are a PITA to get to!

@bigmurph1447

2 ай бұрын

6.7l cummins is easy to work on compared to a duramax or powerstroke. Plus 6.7l cummins only has one fuel rail I think u mean fuel line

@Tiovergudo

2 ай бұрын

HD GM trucks do not use AFM and never have included their current 6.6 gas

Powerstroke high output destroys the duramax. I traded my 22 Silverado 2500 in for a 24 f250, and there is a big difference in power. Gets the load up to speed alot quicker than the duramax.

I'd like to see a modern diesel with a similar idea of hybrid the Tundra platform has where it adds HP/TQ. Imagine the fuel economy if the hybrid system could supply the power required to get this big truck + trailer from a dead stop to a set speed then your diesel starts to aid in output. And under certain circumstances it can utilize both i.e major head wind, and the hybrid system helps keep it in the 10th gear while towing. Build it universal so it can be utilized behind the 6.6L Gas as well.

Just subbed. But I think they will make a 8.3l but its going to be for medium duty trucks. The l5p platform has a ways to go before its topped out. The trans is what needs to be beefed up.

Love your videos brother. Keep it up!

I’m picking up what you’re putting down brotha. Great video. We need to teach them go woke go broke.

The current Duramax has plenty power for today. I have a new F450 HO 6.7L, too much power honestly. So much torque management really isn’t useful for me. My Exhaust brake in the HO is strong. And honestly, I know you are an ISB fan boy but they are hardly even worth a mention anymore. We are in full agreement on one thing, TODAYS Democrats SUCK…

Massive mining operations that are now booming upon in North America are not worried about the price of fuel. They need vehicles that provide capabilities that so far are only being provided by Dodge. Ford and GM need to work on the reliability of their 10 speed automatic transmission as well. Make no mistake tho the market for *MASSIVE* displacement engines from the likes of John Deere and Caterpillar is booming so expect GM to enter into upon this trend and in a big way. Full size truck market (F150, GMC Sierra, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra, Nissan Titan now Tesla Cybertruck) definitely hit an air pocket in sales excepting the Tesla Cybertruck. Would appear to be a good time to be in the market for one of those platforms 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔

Dropping truth bombs!

One of your best videos so far. Thank you.

I’ve had both a LMM 6.6 Duramax and now own a LM2 3.0 in a half ton platform. At the beginning of the video I knew exactly what you were going to say. I think an inline 6 in a larger displacement for HD trucks would be a win for GM, especially with torque. It’s all about towing gains and fuel economy with these HD trucks anymore. If they lose HP numbers who cares, it’s not a race car.

I’ll be fine with my 6.6 all the 8.3 will do is eat more fuel and not get that much more result

The 8.3 size would be lower compression lower NOX. Maybe no DEF needed. A+. More displacement, more power, better reliability. These 6.6 and 6.7 diesels are turned up so much they become unreliable with all the BS emissions systems. I believe they should bring back the 8.1L gas engine and finish the design using the best LS technology and build the large displacement diesel for the heavy duty trucks. If you really use it to pull, it's needed.

Oh snap jb. You doing that comparison video you told me you was going to do. These are the 2 model you asked me about last week. Except i wss looking at the lt silverado agaisnt the sle.

I would say the 8.3 would be for medium duty 4500 and up GMs. And of course it will be derated.

Not everyone is giving up on ICE engines. I own a couple diesels and other gas V8’s. I have no interest in hybrids or electrics.

@fireflyraven2760

2 ай бұрын

Same here also how are those diesels I have never hade to experience of owning one

@techs1smh13

2 ай бұрын

​@fireflyraven2760 if you tow there's nothing like it.

Id thing bigger displacement then do cylinder deactivation on crusing so itll run on 4 cylinders. Itll be like running on a 4.1 while cruising. Bad thing is cylinder deactivation has never been a good thing with gm

No! It'll be a big 8.3 GAS engine

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

A big gas would need more investment vs a diesel.

@bobbrinkerhoff3592

2 ай бұрын

@@jeffwill4923 have you forgotten that they already had a 8.1 , ( 496 ci. ) gas engine ?

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

@@bobbrinkerhoff3592 No, just saying a completely new platform would be needed. Diesel is better option to invest in.

@bobbrinkerhoff3592

2 ай бұрын

@@jeffwill4923 opinions may vary on that subject .

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

@@bobbrinkerhoff3592 The main reason I'm saying diesel is because of a rumor about 2 yrs ago. Power was claimed at over 500 and similar torque to recent HO PS. GM generally doesn't release a engine like such until a full update. Another gas option could still come also. This recent LP5 update could carry over to keep prices down. GM has to be competitive on all trim levels.

People are getting rid of their large displacement gassers? The 7.3 and 6.6 don’t count? And what advantage would a more powerful diesel have? The limit is the truck body and physics.

Yeah buddy

Why isn't the left tolerant of my diesel and big motors? They can barely get the 6.6 in the bay, how are they going to fit in am 8.3. I'll believe it when I see it. But I've read a bigger engine will be easier on emissions while producing more power 🤷🏿‍♂️. The v8s are producing great power. My Superduty is powerful as hell. Would I take more power, hell yes but the hot Superduty is the first truck where I felt I didn't need a tune and I don't crave one. It would be cool to see a hybrid HD for that power.

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

There's a chance it could be a gas but 8.3L diesel can fit. Update in stroke and bore is not going to increase size of this current engine. After watching TFL tow test with 6.7L power stroke HO displacement route looks better. Why because SD dropped boost. With increase in displacement you don't need all that boost.

Man, you being a Trump supporter makes me even happier to watch your content! Go woke, go broke!

I don't believe emission systems will ever go away there's too much money involved from DEF to parts and repairs it's a whole separate industry no matter who's elected I mean we already had a guy for 4 years that could have done away with it a majority controlled house that could have done something about it with all the money and lobbying in politics it probably would be a political death sentence even though it's at the American citizens expense .

No I doubt it but if they did needs 700 HP 1400TQ

If they build an 8.3 I would think it would be for a different class of vehicle. But if they do build it and they put it in pickups hopefully it’s the same or slightly power with better fuel mileage and more reliable emissions. I don’t see GM going away from the v8 architecture for the big engine for pickups.

My man is based! I love it!

The larger displacement would actually help with emissions. A 400 horsepower with a larger vs smaller engine the bigger engine can acheive better emissions. That’s actually the reason GM might go with a bigger engine.

I love it buddy. I just don’t see how anyone can set down and look at what these Democrats support and what their policies are and then say that is the way things should be lol. It’s goofy stupid. They are so far out in left field at this point it’s pitiful. It use to be the difference in Republicans and Democrats were mostly how taxes worked. They both use to atleast love this country. But at this point I don’t see how a Democrat supporter could say they love America. They want to change everything about it. As for the 8.3 Duramax, I don’t know. I wish they would make an 8.3 big block Chevy with the current small block technology.

Emission diesel making 400+ hp and 800+ tq could get the same mileage as a pre-emission diesel truck. It happened. I don’t see the gasser version in GM getting the bump in liters. It will be in the Duramax. All manufacturers are getting away from naturally aspirated engines. Coming to the HD truck sector eventually.

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

If GM does a gas 8.3L or larger it will likely be a different block. I do recall 6.6L heads are different from their LS/LT. Gas engine might need more investment vs diesel.

They are saying the 8.3 is for a 2027 4500 truck.

He is 100% right. This is a woke society. I love the duramax. I have 3, and I will never buy any other diesel ever. 8.3l would be amazing to buy but let's see how much it is loaded denali ultimate is 100k+ that has to be another 20k motor or something crazy. Love the vids JB keep em coming!!

Don't care what the configuration is - just give us a more HP and more Torque!

@Yeti573

2 ай бұрын

All of the big three have ENOUGH power. The big three NEED to focus on reliability, serviceability, functionality, etc. The Duramax and Powerstroke NEED the exhaust brake to compete with the Cummins in bith performance and functionality.

Its weird how they are hypocritical though. I mean the big cities they all cramped up in are more toxic to environment than any other place. Its just they ship all the bad stuff out of sight. I just want a cummins in a Super duty. Love everything else on the truck but my 6.7 power stroke scares me long term and I am serious about maintenance.

would rather see them turbo charge the 6.6l gas

Sad, really brother

Thanks for the great video's and you just showed me how much you and I are aligned! God bless you and your family! My nephew has a 2022 F-250 and just had to have his CP4 pump replaced under warranty. It cratered and they replaced the injectors and fuel lines also. My 2018 Ram 1500 Ecodiesel is now scheduled to have the CP4 replaced under a recall notice. It's been making noise for 2 years now if I don't add some lubricant to the fuel tank each time I fill up. Seafoam works great, but expensive. I've been using HotShots everyday lubricant and it's working fine.

If I could afford to put a blower on a 7.3 gasser I'd do it

Well the Duramax already dives when you hit the breaks do to the IFS. I think the motor will be to heavy. But we will see.

Amen!

Need a Dana super 60 front axle,steal rear drive shaft on long bed trucks, 4.10 gear option on diesel drw and 4.30s for the gas. No one cares about gas mileage as long as its reliable and pulls good up hills.

Best podcast !! ......informative with hard truth!!

Possibly for a 4500 or 5500 application

@outbacker292

2 ай бұрын

Yes

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

Probably be for 1 ton and 2500 max tow pack.

Truth. MAGA

You hit the nail on the head!! I’ve own all three and you are spot on! We need to vote correctly and we can have these ideas come to fruition. Keep up this content!!

Bigger engine will not have to work as hard so combustion temp would be lower and that will cause nox emission to be lower.

Yeah, when I first heard about it, I was thinking maybe for the 45 to 6500's.

keep up the truth

build it and we will buy it

The EPA is at fault. Call your representatives in DC and urge them to put the EPA back in its place!

Cummins has 8.1 or 8.3 red top engine that is really nice but real semis have cats

Let's go brandon

You spoke the truth brother! Thank you for doing that. We need a big change and I hope it's coming soon, like this November! Be well all and again thank you....!!

You mean class 6

I'm offended because Americans know we need an 8.3 duramax...you had me at republican.... TEXANS for TRUMP.

Make double cab AT4s trucks are too big

Always trying to out do Ford

@jeffwill4923

2 ай бұрын

Not really , displacement route is just better. Ford went back to a ohv, why because its the best option. TFL tow test with 6.7L ho saw boost drop much. With displacement GM doesn't have to rely on high boost like SD.

The big three have given us the most powerful, most efficient, most reliable, and CLEANEST batch of pickup trucks ever made. Every year is an improvement on the year before, a trend since the Model T. A 1200 ft/lb truck that can go 250,000 miles with no squeaks or rattles and gets 20mpg with messaging saddle-leather seats isn't good enough? So I gotta say: WTF is wrong with you?!? Complaining on KZread that wokeism isn't giving you the truck you want!?!? Bonkers, man.

I don't think this guy's firing on all cylinders.

You have the balls my man!!!! Good for you!!!!👍

Democrats suck! #FJB

@patriot8087

2 ай бұрын

Yes sir. They are the scourge of the earth.

@Intwodeep902

2 ай бұрын

Amen🙌

@sargenthp

2 ай бұрын

💯

BOOM! 💥

1st 🤷🏽‍♂️

I’m just so grateful that I never fell for his crap and would never, ever vote for him. I have higher standards for my President. I DON'T CARE EITHER: bye LOSERS:

Trump 2024!

Going political is going to lose viewers. Nobody wants to hear you push politics on either side when they come to see vehicle reviews.

@robertchapman4488

2 ай бұрын

He just stated a very short and precise fact. I wouldn't consider that talking politics, so get over yourself now that you gave yourself away. Democrats suck. C-ya

@jtopdawg6

2 ай бұрын

I agree, I don’t want to hear a bunch of political views when I’m watching stuff like this or anything for that matter.

@bryane2857

2 ай бұрын

Nobody? Look at the comments. We want to hear this and it will only help him because the vast majority of men purchasing these trucks are probably Republicans because their is no way a Ball less Democrat would

@Billybob50119

2 ай бұрын

Facts before feelings!!

@robertchapman4488

2 ай бұрын

He said one very short and precise thing I don't consider that politics but at least now we know you're a crappy Democrat. Get over yourself

Please don’t become a Tim Scott.

You should keep out of politics and religion

@Dick-owner

2 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, politics didn’t stay out of truck building.

@HNLN-23

2 ай бұрын

More politics JB!!! those who call for you to stay out of politics are clearly leftists who don’t want the obvious pointed out and that’s the left’s policies destroy society

@sargenthp

2 ай бұрын

Dems should get their noses out of my life.

@t.l.robinson2162

2 ай бұрын

He should say or do whatever he pleases.

@freedomisntfree_44

2 ай бұрын

You should leave america 😂

❤❤❤❤❤❤agreed 1000th percent with you 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

Maybe the most correct video I have seen in a long time

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Everything you're saying is based on speculation! If you want this so bad why don't you engineer for them! Everything you're saying is blah blah blah. Since you're saying you're such a genius go make one!

Preach brother!

FJB!

Hey, that’s where I bought my diesel Yukon