Hi everyone! Thanks to everyone who pointed out the issue on my first Amiga was the fact my GVP 030 accelerator is configured to fill up the first 8mb of RAM in the 24 bit Zorro II address space. I'm well aware of the limitation of 8mb of RAM there maximum --- but at one point I had been fiddling with the jumpers on that card (for another reason) and I guess I left it set that way. I always assumed it would be using only 32bit memory space for the 12mb of RAM that's on it. DOH! So that'll likely fix it all -- several people confirmed Janus works fine on all versions of Kickstart and with all accelerators. Double DOH!!!!!!!!

@janhofmeier9427

2 жыл бұрын

The problem with the floppy on the A2088 is that the cable shouldn't have a twist. The A drive is connected internally with a cable without twist, and you can connect an Amiga drive as B: drive on the external connector

@SidneyCritic

2 жыл бұрын

Well at least we are getting another vid - lol -.

@adriansdigitalbasement

2 жыл бұрын

@@janhofmeier9427 Good one -- I guess they went back to a normal cable on the 286 one. Yeah the original cable and drive is in the machine that I couldn't get working (due to the memory configuration)

@janhofmeier9427

2 жыл бұрын

@@adriansdigitalbasement yes the A2286 uses a normal cable. IT doesn't have the external connector so both Drives go on the internal. See my other longer comment for more Details

@joshhiner729

2 жыл бұрын

Also in regards to a graphics card I use an original IBM cga card. I hook the composite out to the composite in on my 1084 and simply use the rgb/composite switch to flip between pc and amiga. Totally awesome. Using a cga card you can play games and applications at full speed. Definitely recommend that. Also a 1084 monitor has digital and analog input as you know already but you cant hook both in at the same time for some reason even though there is an rgb/ttl switch so I use composite as explained. You could put in a 9pin switch box I guess. Ill try that some day and use the switch box to flip back and forth while also toggling the ttl switch (kind of a pain but it works). Try playing with the amouse dos tool and also the tools which allow file copying between the amiga and pc side. Works well also! I actually have a gotek hooked to the bridge card also vs old floppy drive and the controller will read up to 720k disks. The bridge cards actually work great. There is a learning curve though. Check out the replacement for pcwindow which is called viaduct. It will render the Bridgecard onto an rtg graphics card for better color and performance. Totally recommend viaduct.

I am 65 and remember the wonderful days of MSDOS , I even remember when PCDOS 1.1 first arrived! I was there when CPM was first made available. Oh those were heady times.

Team Retr-o-mat here. We have alot of experience with those cards. If you have any questions about them and problems you cannot solve we are here for you. We are visiting conventions where we are exibitors showing the bridgeboards in action.

I'm 13 years old and I really enjoy your videos my favorite old computer is a commodore 64

@cristiit7999

2 жыл бұрын

Same im 14 years old and i enjoy that

@NozomuYume

2 жыл бұрын

@@cristiit7999 That's cool that you guys are into ancient computers. A lot of people are afraid interest will go away as old dudes die.

@MattyEngland

2 жыл бұрын

I agree, nice to see younger people getting into retro computing. 👍

In fairness, nobody with an Amiga in the 1980s was adding a Brodgeboard for graphics or games. It was access to PC business programs, which will run decently in 2 or 4 color modes with MDA the best option.

@another3997

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucasrem What on earth are you whining about? He made a simple observation about why people used a bridge boards back in the '80s. PC games back then were generally graphically and sonically worse than the stuff the Amiga had. PCs were still considered business machines. Grow up.

@jurgennl817

2 жыл бұрын

It's probably different for everyone but I added the bridgeboard to play pc games. I love rpg games and the pc had them all in those days. I added a hard disk (two partitions, so you could use it for both systems) and EGA card as well. I loved my amiga 2000

@blazer666del

6 ай бұрын

I played games on my bridgeboard..so not entirely true

@thomasschlitzer7541

3 ай бұрын

Why would anyone add an inferior system to the Amiga. That just doesn't make sense. Amiga was galaxies ahead- Until Commodore killed her with the worst business handling in the history of computers. I would NEVER add a PC card to my beloved girl. Ever!

@karehaqt

3 ай бұрын

@@thomasschlitzer7541 Not everyone is you, shocking I know.

I will never get tired of these absolutely massive add-on cards. Something about the size, filled with all those components shoved in makes them look great. You only get those with GPUs nowadays.

I think the ’D i A bad’ in the other XT card means also ’Drive A bad’. Really entertaining to watch you work on these bridge boards!

@PJBonoVox

2 жыл бұрын

It was. I was shouting at the screen (figuratively).

@heilong108

2 жыл бұрын

Came here to post this

@heilong108

2 жыл бұрын

I wonder of he needs to connect the FDD to the non twisted connector on the floppy cable on these XT cards for whatever reason

@Rothammel1

Жыл бұрын

49:38

@logipilot

7 ай бұрын

​@@heilong108the commodore pc 10 uses non twisted floppy cables! (=Shugart style) The boot screen of this looks like the old commodore pc too...

I really enjoyed that video - I have a 2286 card in my A2000 as well, and your struggles remind me of mine with that card. First, I can only confirm what others say - it works with either up to 6M RAM on the Zorro bus, or with all extra memory moved to 32 bit space with a 030 accelerator. The card is totally compatible with Kickstart 3.1, so that's definitely no issue. Regarding the battery issue - I bought a coin-cell battery holder that can replace the type of Lithium battery that came with the A2286 originally, and it works like a charm. No more entering setup when starting the A2286. What really drove me crazy was to get an IDE controller working on the PC side. This definitely needs a more modern BIOS to work with SD cards or any modern media, but the Janus handlers taking up the D000 address space are a real pain. I was finally able to get it to work with a version of EZ drive, a workaround developed to get past the HD space limitation of early PC controllers. Using this, I could finally get an IDE controller to work on the PC side, and this really makes a difference in speed. The same is true if you plug in a VGA card - full speed as you would expect it on a 286 PC. Don't worry about the PC Prefs on the Amiga - plugging in a VGA card will totally disable the PC display on the Amiga side. However, you still need to start PC Mono to have the keyboard and mouse signals forwarded to the PC (or you use the keyboard connector on the A2286 to connect a PC keyboard (there's a pin header for connecting a PC keyboard directly to the card, you have to build an adapter yourself, however). You can minimize the window down to a very small size, though.

@fffUUUUUU

2 жыл бұрын

Bump

@bozimmerman

2 жыл бұрын

Super helpful comments. Thanks!

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

I had no problem getting a general ISA I/O card IDE adapter to work with an IDE-CF adapter (SD mote often works on IDE adapters). But I needed to use Ontrack Bios overlay software to make a boot record. No reason to connect a PC keyb. There are commodities on Aminet for swapping with hotkey without running anything visual.

@derek20la

Жыл бұрын

@@remijakobsen1848 Ontrack BIOS overlay software... that just brought back quarter century old memories of my 850mb Maxtor drive 🦕

Note that internally on the bridgeboard, the display is running at full speed. It is the speed of the Amiga copying that PC Bridgeboard display ram to the Amiga chipram which generates that sluggish output. So even if you used a spreadsheet, you were able to cope. Games on the other hand were useless. You would need to plug in a VGA board for that.

@TheTurnipKing

2 жыл бұрын

Of course, at the time the Amiga native versions of the games tended to be better anyway.

@epremeaux

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah my guess is that the shared ram is not dual port ram. So the two large PLAs handle swapping that ram back and forth between the Zoro and PC busses. meaning you get, at best, 50% ram performance on both ends. Any processing that STAYS on the PC side should run at full speed though. So, I would assume that, for example, ISA network cards, hard disks, and a video card would run at the same performance as any same spec pc. Mouse and keyboard passing through that shared memory might not be noticibly sluggy, but may want some dedicated solution for gaming there as well. Soooo.. now you have a fully decked out PC, crammed inside your Amiga. I have always drooled over them back in the day, but their only REAL use is to give the Amiga access to things that were otherwise really expensive on the miggy, like networking, cheaper IDE storage, and "business" software.

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

Default is MDA mode, 1 bit ANSI text mode is fast enough and what you need for WP and Lotus123. Its a jumper setting on A2088XT. Note, most A2088XT can run 50% faster just using a DOS command. 7.5 mhz.

As I remember it back in the day the Amiga was generally thought of as a much better gaming machine than the PC's of the day (as it had better graphics and sound than the average CGA based PC with beeper sounds). This means that people who bought these bridge boards generally did so for work purposes, usually word processing and spreadsheets. I think it is worth trying the 286 card with a VGA card as the CGA graphics here looks to be a software emulation rather than a hardware adaptor and as such shouldn't cause a conflict. While there is not much computing power for games on a 286 there were 386 class bridge boards as well which rumour says could be upgraded with a clip on 486 module.

@primus711

2 жыл бұрын

Def true u can make the 286/386 to 486 and there was also the golden gate vortex that had 486 which i upgraded to ibm blue lighting

@SirReptitious

Жыл бұрын

I can't remember if mine was a 286 or 386 BB, but I bought one of those Cyrix 486SLC clip-on CPUs and it worked great, even though it only had 1K of L1 cache IIRC. Unfortunately I found out the hard way that once you install it, never ever remove it. It came with a small green stick-on heat sink, but obviously got hot enough to make the exposed wires on the clip-on brittle. I can't remember now why I wanted to remove it, but when I did most of the wires for the chip just crumbled. ;-(

@nicholas_scott

11 ай бұрын

I had a 286 daughter card for my A500, and that was my experience. Never bothered to run games. It was mainly so I could do my homework up at college since my professors all required us to use specific DOS-based programs. Worked perfectly for those applications, but you did have to tinker with the memory a bit

@fordesponja

7 ай бұрын

@@nicholas_scott sounds like the definitive experience back then, all the perks of a gaming beast and the compatibility for general purpose. How expensive that setup was?

Yay I'm glad you were able to use the cards! It's really interesting that you posted this video on the weekend that you did. I had been out of town all weekend on an Amiga rescue mission where I picked up two A4000s and an A2000HD all with battery corrosion damage. If you ever find yourself in Wisconsin I'll make sure to buy you some cheese curds!

In my opinion there is no twist on the floppycable for the XT Card. So if you use the twisted cable your floppy drive will be drive B! So Drive A is bad. Btw i love your Videos i see every video from you. Take up the good work. Greetings from germany.

@joefish6091

2 жыл бұрын

jumpers can invert the twist. it was only for people who didn't or couldn't set their jumpers.

I think the pc card is really cool just to see dos and amiga multitasking between them :D I already knew the downsides of this card, so I was not disappointed when I got it.

Amazing video as always, Adrian! The BEST part of owning one of these cards was lording it over your PC friends that you could multitask and run their software in the background. It didn't matter that it was slow - the multitasking switch back and forth was enough to make everyone jealous!

as stated last time, configure your gvp card to map the memory all into 32bit space and you should be good, J12 IIRC

@NozomuYume

2 жыл бұрын

Good info on the jumper. I hope Adrian sees this.

@kanepeterson9775

2 жыл бұрын

The Bridgeboard starts booting when binddrivers is run in startup-sequence.

@kanepeterson9775

2 жыл бұрын

In the PC side Bridgeboard software, there is an 'atime' tool that will sync the PC clock to the Amiga clock.

@kanepeterson9775

2 жыл бұрын

The window sometimes only being on half of the screen when you switch resolution is a bug in the Janus 2.1 software. The Janus 2.1 software was technically only for the 2386SX Bridgeboard, but it worked with the XT/AT ones as well (but never shipped with those cards).

@kanepeterson9775

2 жыл бұрын

The XT card port is a DB23 Floppy connector, you can connect an Amiga drive to it and use it to read PC disks.

I had a sidecar for my a1000, then a bridge board for my 2000. This was very neat being able to use the ibm hdd with the Amiga etc. and let me do my pc based assignments at the time. Pretty ground breaking at the time that you had two different computer hardware running on the same display etc. good times

Regarding plugging floppy drives in backwards: one of the pins which ends up being selected is the write enable pin, which results in the drive magnetically erasing whichever track the head happened to be looking at at the time. When working with hardware, always remember to remove any valuable floppies before powering on if you're replacing floppy drives!

Video speed - gotta remember, it's having to send across the bus to the Amiga side, get it into the chip ram, then have the amiga side render it... If you use a dedicated video card on the PC side it should be just fine.

@JeremyLevi

2 жыл бұрын

@@Great-Documentaries Back in the day you probably would have opted for a CGA or EGA (with 15Khz support) card instead, to avoid having to buy a second monitor (most of the Amiga monitors support digital RGBi as well as the analog RGB for the Amiga). Now though yes obviously VGA would be the better choice, for sure.

Zorro has a Max of 8mb. So your gvp took it all up!

@BertGrink

2 жыл бұрын

Does that apply to all versions of the Zorro Bus, or only to Zorro II? Just being curious, as I only have an A1200 (with a 4MB RAM + 68881 FPU expansion card), and therefore have no chance of using a bridgeboard ;)

@NozomuYume

2 жыл бұрын

@@BertGrink Zorro I/II yes. Zorro III has 32-bit address space so if you add Z3 cards running in Z3 mode, they should allocate from Z3 space. There are expansions for the A1200 that will actually let you use a bridgeboard. Most of them are Zorro II only. There was one design that allowed you to use (non-DMA) Zorro III but it required an A3000/A4000 CPU card to allow Z3 to work (since the A1200 expansion port only has 24-bit addressing, but if you put a 32-bit CPU card on the bus expansion then it could bypass this).

@BertGrink

2 жыл бұрын

@@NozomuYume Thank you for your reply; i was certain that Zorro III was 32-bits, and therefore wouldn´t have such restrictions, but I thought it better to ask. Also, I am aware that there has been different "big box" expansions for the A1200 which included a motherboard with ZIII, PCI, or both; this has unfortunatly been outside of my financial ability to purchase. Thus my A1200 + RAM/FPU remains my only hardware option. There´s still emulation, though, where i can have ANY setup i want, something I often indulge in :D

I love SOB cards! (system on a board) My Sun E420R server has the SunPCI III board with a mobile Athlon 1600+ at 1.4GHz. Unlike your ordeal, this just worked perfectly out of the box. And it really is a completely independent computer. I tend to think of that server as a PC surrounded by a full fledged 4x SPARC UNIX machine! As if the PC had caused the UNIX server to come into existence.

Gotta love these old PCs. _The current time is 9:105 and 15 seconds, of the year 10001_ (38:10)

There was something satisfying about hearing you say "TTL logic", perhaps it's the symmetry it creates since it stands for "transistor-transistor logic logic"

@joefish6091

2 жыл бұрын

CMOS logic and TTL silence...

I ran PC-Task (full software emulation) on my accelerated A1200 and while the screen updates were very slow the actual code (while still slow) ran much better. The best way to mess with people was to run PC-Task (PC emulation) & Shapeshifter (Mac emulation) at the same time. It was great watching peoples minds explode when you showed all of them running at the same time.

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

Better to run SoftWindows pc emulator in MacOS on your Amiga.

@daishi5571

Жыл бұрын

@@remijakobsen1848 Didn't have it at the time (still don't), but it would have been fun to emulate a Mac to emulate a PC while emulating a PC from the Amiga. Although now I think about it, there could be the possibility it would tear open a hole in the universe :-/

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

@@daishi5571 I tested it yesterday. Softwin is more refined than PC Task. It got graphic drivers in 68k code in Win3.11 that comes with it, so it runs faster than in PCTask.

@daishi5571

Жыл бұрын

@@remijakobsen1848 Thats cool. Could you point me in the direction I can get hold of it.

the bridge card was the solution for people who took computer classes in school and had to hand in their homework e.g. in Borland Pascal, TurboC or whatever.

@rarbiart

2 жыл бұрын

@@Great-Documentaries Exactly. not many students! but some did absolutly not want a native dos machine. (and concerning prices: when you started with HDDs and multisync CRTs, the prices were even higher. in other words: it's a question of priorities)

@NozomuYume

2 жыл бұрын

@@rarbiart Commodore also sold a primitive MDA-only software emulator called Transformer that was good enough if you didn't care about speed or the ability to run anything with graphics.

Back when I had an A500 I actually remember running a DOS software emulator which had a clock speed of something ridiculous like 0.1Mhz.

Love Amigas. Thank you Adrian for featuring all of this older hardware. Commodore forever.

I had a 3rd party 486 'Bridgeboard' with VGA and it worked very well indeed.

On the square sockets, pulling and reseating the chip can make a difference, the cause might be oxidation.

I just made 3 partitions and installed Workbench 3.1, Mac OS, and Windows simultaneously to the same hard drive. Added the co-processor chip, and a full size engineering level graphics card for the 486 PC bridgeboard. All platforms available on a 19" Sony Trinitron with separate inputs for each. Adobe suite on the Mac, MS Office and AutoCAD on the PC worked flawlessly.

The Amiga 1000 version was called the Sidecar and the comnunication driver was called the Janus Handler. Oh they where good days

This, "remove the card, insert it again" and the "reset button" are 2 things showing how complex a computer is. Really great piece of engineering, yet so complex that it's better to stop, clean and start again.

It still totally amazes me that ASICs reduced this vast constellation of chips to one or two in latter day network cards! I remember so well chassis-spanning token ring cards that cost a fortune in the early days of office networks! I was certain that token ring was the future! And ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) was next!

@stevesether

2 жыл бұрын

They might have been, had we not invented switched ethernet. The PC world is rife with "good enough", cheap, and short term solutions that had higher priced, better designed competitors that were predicted to someday overtake the cheap solution do to better design. What actually happened though was that Moore's law took over, and the "better design" lost to just shoving silicon at the more popular and cheaper first solution. That's how we got ethernet over everything else, and x86 over the predicted rise of RISC chips. IBM tried the same thing with the better designed (but proprietary and controlled by IBM) MCA bus to replace the ISA bus. The clone makers fought back, and designed EISA, and later on something actually decent, PCI. Microchannel was a much better design than just modifying ISA a bit, and had auto-config of IO and IRQ built in. It took until PCI for the clones to get that.

@ultrametric9317

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevesether Obviously you were there :)

I had quite the thrill listening to my cylinder recordings on my 8 track machine just last week.

Hello from Wisconsin! I love your videos. I've been plowing through them. I love listening to you troubleshoot computers. I'm an electronics nerd, who has just been learning how it all works through osmosis over the years, so I've learned a lot from your videos. I regularly repair very basic audio electronics, but I'm like a Caveman with a lighter most of the time, just fiddling around trying to fix things. Thanks for what you do! I've used some of your affiliate links to buy some more gear for my repairs, I hope that helps.

Everybody loved A1000 with Commodore Sidecar !

I used a similar ( smaller ) card in the AtariST called AT Speed and used it for BlueWave, a BBS email reader. Also I ran Windows3 and some other DOS/Win only stuff. Was a small board that fits on the CPU and shared memory with the ST. The back and forth switching, keeping the RAM status on the ST system was just very awesome. It was both hardware emulation and virtualisation.

I remember working at a few places in the late 80's that had various amigas with bridge boards, and the PC part was mostly used for spreadsheets, Word Perfect or using the corporate PC software, so video update speed wasn't really a big issue. The fact that they were using Amigas in the first place meant that anything with heavy graphic content (CAD, design etc) was being done on the Amiga side.

Excellent detail on this video... very good work, sir!

I will say, this was one of the most impressive parts manufactured. An accelerator to drop on top of the processor. Technically impressive, but lost the contract to not being radiation hardened. Also, the brats are safe. They hung for a month before being sent to you.

great video! helped me a lot getting my A2088XT working on my 2000!!!

Janus is such a great name for it as Janus was the god of door ways and transitions, haha.

My opinion as a cross platform developer today is, if I had to work at this time on a cross platform software for interfacing, industrial or whatever without the ability of virtual machines, this would have been a dream. Also not fiddling around with two machines on one bench and exchanging data with floppies would have been the optimal situtation. Therefore the poor graphics is no problem. Or the other point you mentioned, connecting to a mainframe, where e.g. you only have software for a x86 machine could relief your headaches using an amiga. Keep going on making such good videos and a happy weekend.

@joefish6091

2 жыл бұрын

we used Laplink over 232 or printer port back in the day. for full final guranteed working product, you need real target metal on the bench, VMs can only be trusted so far.

As a university student I needed a PC/MS DOS for Lotus123 and Borland Turbo Pascal. I upgraded from a stock A500 (which was purely used for games) to the A2000 with the A2088 bridgeboard with an MFM PC hard drive which was split so the Amiga could use it too. SCSI hard drives for the Amiga were just way too expensive. The Amiga couldn't boot from it, but once the PC software was started it worked fine. As this was my first PC/computer with a hard drive it was a major upgrade and a lot faster than using floppy disks. Buying a separate PC with a monitor would have cost a lot more.

A discrete VGA card and a discrete hard disk were almost a must for users of the BridgeBoards. It was the only way to overcome the Amiga's lack of 256 color support and slow screen updates and slow drive performance on the emulated hard disk partition.

The window mode is so you can minimise the fullscreen view and keep the DOS view in a window while using workbench

Almost fifty on my personal gauge, still big sentiment to Commodore Amiga.. I had three, 500, 600, 1200 Tower. Still have a bunch of floppy discs, (most of them stored in my PC). Beautiful times, lot of nostalgia... Greets from Poland - from automation engineer.

Nowadays companys use Proxmox for VMs to have several virtual machines or develop cross-architecture, but back in the days I think this card was a huge help and saved some space. I like your videos a lot and have always learned something new. It is as if I would go to my friend's house back in the days when he has gotten something new and we explored it together. Greetings from Germany and keep up the good work.

I had the 286 bridgeboard on my Amiga 2000, back in the day (I didn't have an accelerator, just stock Amiga 2000) when I was a college student (low-budget gaming/development box). I used an 8-bit MFM HD controller with a 30MB Kalok drive on the 286-side, partitioned 10MB for the 286, 20MB for the Amiga, I had to boot the Amiga side on floppy, custom script to start the bridgeboard, then wait for about 45 seconds, then it would mount the 286's hard-drive back to the amiga, and run the rest of the workbench startup from the hard drive. I also had a 16-bit VGA card on the 286-side, and a second monitor on top of a plank I put across the top of the Amiga 2000 case, to support the 2 CRTs side-by-side. The hot-key on amiga keyboard would switch between which system was being typed into. I could even run VGA DOS games, since had the dedicated hardware for the video. Add in the MAC emulator software, and could have Mac running in a window on the Amiga side, the 286 running MS-DOS in it's monitor on the left monitor... all 3 running at once in real-time speed (no emulation, aside from video mapping for the Mac). This setup let me use a cheap IBM-compatible hard-drive on my Amiga, instead of the overpriced SCSI drives that were typically used on Amiga and Mac at the time.

Yep had one of these installed in my Amiga 2000 in the early 90s.

Ahh the video toaster - had so much fun with that in the early 90’s. We had a Panasonic “M2” format vtr that could record 1 frame (or more for lower FPS) from lightwave - it would take a few seconds to a minute to render a frame, then the vtr would rewind a bit, play, and record that frame (the rec light would briefly flicker too), and then wait for the Amiga to finish the next frame. Would have a nice little animation… the next morning!

I had a 2000 with a 8088 BB as my first computer in '88-'89, and soon it started.. well, not starting.. I was an engineer student at the time, and 'the shit' with my co-students was a souped-up 286 with VGA and SB, but they were in awe with the possibilities I had with the Amiga! I soon found out that the problem lied in the PLCC sockets, and a quick remove/reinsert of those chips made it start again for a while. But soooo slow! 3,5 minutes boot time since the 30MB HD was connected to the Bridgeboard, and the XT had to be up and running before the Amiga could access the 10 meg partition through it. Oh, the memories! :D

I had a sidekick for a 1000, and it worked, but I can't think of a reason a person would have wanted to run a 286 when they had an Amiga. I still have two AT boards, meant to fit in a 2000, which were installed on two A2000s I purchased. . I pulled them, because I just couldn't find a use for them. One of the boards, has all the chips populated on one main board, and the other, has a daughter board, that mad it a tight squeeze to install a board beside it.. I remember, getting suckered into buying the "new" DOS 5, and remember feeling ripped off. Yeah, the good old days..

If no one has mentioned it, check out VIADUCT. Its an enthusiast version of the PC software for the bridgeboard.

Bought my Amiga 1000 2 weeks after it came out, with the rumor that some PC OS software was being made, so 2 weeks after I bought the Amiga 1000 the Transformer Software package came out, bought it, and ran the PC Software Lotus 123, Dbase, Word Perfect, and other types of office software, since I was doing Lotus 123 and Dbase programming using macro's, it got me through the year with what I needed to do. A little bit slower, but good enough to do my work at home when my Otrana carry computer went and broke. By the way it is great seeing a person who knows how to run a Amiga and Dos. I used the Amiga Transformer and PC-task. both ran well on an Amiga, but when I put it on an Amiga Emulator on today's PC, they actually run faster then the boards and emulators made for an Amiga.

Thanks for the light show. It is inevitable that mistakes are going to happen, I am glad that no serious damage was done to the card. That is a neat trick to determine the faulty cap that is in line with other caps on the same circuit.

@jjock3239

9 ай бұрын

Sorry, that was meant to go on the last video of yours I watched, where you blew up an tantalum capacitor.

I had the 2000 with the AT bridgeboard. Sent it back within a couple of weeks as although I liked the hardware on the Amiga side, the AT side was so flakey, and I needed a PC specifically for my educational needs. Ended up getting a PC instead, and no Amiga again for nearly 30 years!

Good to know the one I sent you helped in the troubleshooting than just the Janus error.

2:45 When I first went to work for an ISP in the mid-1990s, I was confused why almost all of our networking equipment had 10Base-5 ports, despite the fact it was almost entirely obsolete, in the face of 10Base-2 and 10Base-T(X). (We actually found a 10Base-5 segment with a vampire tap one day in 1997 or 1998, hidden under a false floor, and were surprised by it -- nobody still working there knew it was there!) It was cheaper to provide a 10Base-5 interface, instead of both 10Base-2 and 10Base-T, and 10Base-5 incidentally provided power to the port, which could power a transceiver to your choice of interface, instead of needing an external power supply. And if you were spending several thousand dollars on a piece of equipment, the cost of a transceiver was negligible. That said, it was much more common for consumer equipment of the time to come with anywhere from one to three of those interfaces.

I hope you can get these working better in the future i enjoyed this video shame you didnt get it fully working though.

Adrian, I noticed when testing the 286 board, you skipped passed the "Display Task Priority" option in the pulldown menus. Did you ever go back and test the highest "10" priority setting?

I may have a newer Janus.library, it's still there A4000 backup's on WinUAE, though it cant do anything there. Just a note: I had Comodore's 386SX Bridgeboard working on my A3000 and A4000 with kickstart 3.0/3.1 if I remember correctly. There was a patch for the janus library you need to get for all the bridgeboards to run in 3.x, though is may be described only for the 386 model, it should work for all bridgeboards. I'm willing to send a copy out, though it will be inside a .hdf file with the full Janus PC install on the HD as files, not. the original install disks.

That shirt is great. Perfect for retro computer KZreadr based in Portland.

I guess I was rich because I had a A2386 with a VGA card on a 3000. I was fully loaded on that system. It took me through college, I ran DOS software on it and did my word processing on the Amiga side.

Love the Amiga stuff, very interesting. I must dig out my A1500 from the back of the loft, but I fear the varta has probably killed it by now. Great video as usual Adrian, keep up the great work.

@hernancoronel

Жыл бұрын

So did the varta killed it? Just wondering…

I had an A2000 with kickstart 1.3 and a Bridgeboard 386SX - 16 Mhz in the early 90's. I didn't experience the kinds of the software bugginess you had in your video, so I guess the kickstart version might have something to do with it. The motherboard had all 16 bit ISA connectors except 1 that was 8 bit. I simply soldered in the missing connector and used a VGA - card in it. It really made a big improvement for the display performance of my Bridgeboard. I think the VGA - card just worked without any fiddling with the software and I used to play pc - games with the Bridgeboard before selling my Amiga and moving to 486DX2-66.

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

When softeeset pc in video, Amiga freezes a few sec, its not hanging. He just rebooted before he noticed it had not hung.

I used to run these with a separate VGA-card and that improved the speed quite noticeably! Then again I used to compare the speed with my original PC and then this wasn't too bad!

Used my bridge card to run a bbs off of it for the amiga. Had an ibm harddrive controller and vga card installed along with a monitor dedicated to the pc side of things. Was great fun at the time. Ran with an Emplant card for Apple Mac OS as well. Made all my friends jealous. Lol

As far as I know, those bridge boards need 512k autoconfig memory space and your gvp accelerator occupies the whole 8m, the bridgeboard is thus not configured by amigaos, and thats why sysinfo shows "size=0k". Remove some ram from your accelerator or move the ram out of 24bit memory space, to get enough free space in the autoconfig area...

Janus's display is sampled and reconstructed as a planar image. It's the major bottleneck for all the Bridgeboards. But it was good enough to run productivity apps, which is why we all used them.

I remember my dad literally bought the Amiga 1000 because of the existence of these IBM bridge-boards. He thought he would be able to use it to bring work stuff home and have the best of both worlds, but ALAS it was a huge disappointment straight out of the box and was never used for its intended purpose. Before long we had a real PC and an Amiga sitting side by side.

This is the kind of basement I need. Thanks, Adrian.

A few things come to mind 1. The A2065 networks cards are still very usefull, even without the adapter, you could run a coax network between the two cards. 2. Regarding the issue with sdcard and A2091 it could be related to the WD scsi controller chip on the A2091 most of those cards are born with a rev 3 or rev 4 of the WD33C93A chip which is know to have issues with "scsi disconnects" and since the sdcard is removeable then it probably utilizes disconnects (just thinking out loud on this one - no familiar with the particular adapter you use). For the least issues / best performance a combination of rev 8 scsi chip, guru rom, and 14mhz speed mod is kinda the goto combo for the A2091. 3. The slow graphics speed is kinda what you would expect - all the graphics has to be transfered through the bridgeboard and through zorro II and then through the onboard amiga agnus into the chip ram before finally being displayed by denise... and somewhere along the way it has to be converted from chunky to planar graphics - not sure if this happen in the custom asic's, or on the 68k cpu/janus library or at what step but it just HAS to be slow by design... dedicated vga card/multi monitor must be the way to go. I wonder if it would help with a RTG (chunky enabled) zorro II graphics card (doubt janus software supports direct to rtg but maybe someone patched it). 4. Any thoughts on overclocking the 286 i.e. with that 20mhz 286 chip you have ?

Looking back, its amazing that people had in their hands a graphics and music wonder computer yet the motivation was to scramble into geting MS-DOS on their Amigas! Shows the power of having killer apps.

@jsrodman

Ай бұрын

I mean, the number of amiga users who added bridgeboards was pretty small. But there certainly was a market for them. If you already owned an amiga 2000, the bridgeboard was way cheaper than buying a whole additional 286, and way more convenient on the desk. Nearly every Amiga user who bought it to play games was on an A500 for cost reasons.

I plan on testing this with my ATI VGA Wonder XL/24 and an XT-CF. At least in WinUAE, it seems to work with a virtual EGA card. I will follow up this post once I have a PiStorm2K to revive my German 2K I bought off a friend from over there.

Brings back memories. Those cards were buggy as hell. I swear I lost months trying to get them working properly back in the day.

53:00 Hi Adrian, having had a bridgeboard since 1990, my experience is as you found: the software based screen on the Amiga just stinks. It works fine, even with an XT bridgeboard, to just throw a VGA card in a PC slot. That is what I did for my #DOScember (2020) on the Amiga project. Peace.

Add the 2 extra connectors for the 2 last slots. That would be an awesome video and addition to that amazing Amiga.

To answer your questen there have been Amiga 5.25" Floppys they usually had a switch on the backside to select 40/80 Tracks. They stored 440KB/880KB(1:1 3.5"). This drives have been Double Density not High Density. So it could read/write PC 360KB Floppys and and 720KB that was seldom used on PC atleast on 5.25".

Amiga font was really better than IBM compatibles... Seeing IBM Compatible with amiga font is cool!

Have you tried connecting the floppy drive to the "B" connector (without the twist)? It's been a long time since I've seen one of those in the flesh, but I seem to remember it was a straight cable without twist (of course the floppy could be jumpered to the other ID...).

@SidneyCritic

2 жыл бұрын

Shame he didn't realise all 3 cards had the same floppy problem, ie, highly unlikely 3 cards have the exact same fault, so your cable idea is probably right.

@MaT-eq4el

2 жыл бұрын

I thought the same. with the twist make the floppy drive bootable. and that is why it could not boot.

@remijakobsen1848

Жыл бұрын

A2088 int port is for 5.25 360kb drive, no twist. B: is port in rear for Amigs ext floppy, getting 720kb

The second Amiga has the HDD and power LEDs reversed. Also, beware of having a floppy disc in a disc drive while the floppy cable is reversed; it often ruins the software on the disc completely.

OLD sockets sockets sockets. Always a good idea to pop the chips and reseat on these old cards.. I've owned alot of these bridgeboards,they are fairly reliable,except for battery leaks on the 2386 cards. i have always used these on 3.1 roms with no trouble. You can use a external amiga drive on the external bridgeboard 23pin connector as a PC floppy. hardfiles are painfully slow,a real drive helps for the pc side. adding a vga card also helps since video etc is being pushed thru the zorro2 buss at a max of 3.5MB/s(if that!)

@joefish6091

2 жыл бұрын

Use EIDE-CF adaptor rather than physical HD.

I started my ICT career with an Amiga 1200 and a 286 card that sat on top of the processor. I had to run dBase software. I have been an Amiga fan all those years!

You don't need to physically swap ROMs to run a different Kickstart version; use something like ReloKick to load a different version into RAM and you're good to go. (And as everyone else has pointed out, your accelerated machine is eating all the address space.)

Apple going the external video out route for their windows compatible card makes a lot of sense after seeing this

The 8088 card shipped with a 5.25 floppy drive and a straight cable -- no twisty. That is what you tried on the 1st Amiga, but because of the GVP card you moved to the second Amiga. On the second Amiga you used a 3.5 floppy drive and connected it to the twisty end. What happens if you connect a 5.25 to the straight end. Also, you didn't seem to notice in the video, but the Drive A Fail happened on both your 8088 cards; that was the fail message you were seeing corrupted by the ram problem on the second card, which is what makes me think you have a cabling problem.

@sergeypotapov1896

Ай бұрын

It shouldn't be just any 5.25 floppy drive, it should be a 360KB 5.25 floppy drive :-)

back in the day, I think it was about 1989, I had a mate who designed and built his own 386 bridgeboard with 1MB RAM for his A2000, this was when at the time 286 bridgeboards were really the only ones you could afford. I told him he should have mass produced it and made some $$$ but he wasnt interested, for him it was more about the challenge to do it.

I got one of these bridgeboards in an Amiga 2500. It's rocking a 386 SX-16 chip. Scorching-fast.

I soo wanted a bridgeboard but couldnt afford, or justify, getting one. In the end I remember getting PC-Task on my A4000 and installing windows 3.1 on a school night. Kept waking up excitedly and checking if it was time to swap disks. Damn it was slow...and I was soo tired the next day :D

This is one of those cases where something was so over-engineered and probably cost an absolute bomb, that they would have been better off just getting another machine.

The GoldenGate 386 and 486 bridgeboards were pretty amazing pieces of kit; I wish I'd had a big box Amiga and one of those. I could've justified holding on to the Ami a little longer then. Some die-hards still use 2000s, 3000s and 4000s with ISA SBCs that are still made with modern systems on them - dual- and quad-core systems, tons of RAM, that could emulate the native Amiga faster than the Amiga itself! But I appreciate the effort! But, as they're SBCs and not Bridgeboards, unlike the 2086, 2088, and 2286 (and Golden Gate '386 and '486 cards), they're not accessible from the Amiga side as easily as the older ones.

the best bridge card was buying an additional Commodore PC aside...

I think for the POST card to work on the 286 bridge card it would have to be connected directly to it. I think that because if the bridge card is in the main board expansion slot, the post card should be responding to the Amiga main board, not the 286 bridge.

Hi, I've added the two 16bit missing parts of the ISA slots on my A2000 and with my A2386 they work fine I've also added a 16bit vga and a sound blaster with no problems.

I have a couple AUI adapters. Want em? Might also have some 10baseT hubs with the additional 10Base5 connection. That would allow you an easy interface to a modern network with a small 10base5 network.

I thought I'm a huge Amiga fan, turns out I only love the Amiga 500 and it's games.

dumb idea but does the floppy work if you connect it to the drive B slot on the cable instead of drive A? I know amigas swap that and maybe they just wired the PC one unusually too?

I would have used one to run a BBS. I didn’t have one. So I spent two years rewriting Petra BBS Amiga software to run ANSI graphics and the like. The things you’ll do as a kid with limited resources

I had the 286 Bridgeboard in my A3000 back in early '90s. The slowness was a massive problem even back then. I was never able to use it for my planned purposes and it turned out to be a huge waste of money.

The A2088XT card is quite slow, as an XT machine should be. The internal connector for floppy drives only works with 360 kB 5.25", it was enough to just read the manual :-). As for the A2286AT, it's just excellent card. When I bought it, I was happy as an elephant. It runs all the games that I played as a child on a 286 processor, including ATTENTION!!! Wolf3D. In my Amiga I added 16-bit ISA bus extensions and use this emulator in conjunction with a VGA-card, a Sound Blaster and a modern HDD controller with an CF-card. Everything works perfectly!